BETWEEN:
Age: Narayan
R/o Dist.
And (by
Age: Smt.
R/o No.
(by Act
Judge passed petition
THE
THE
Sri
Sri Hebballi,
52/3,
52
against c/p
47 Dharwad-580
Sujata
This
IN
B.K.
HON’BLE
years, A.B.
years,
HON’BLE
ON in
(Sr. s/o
Raju filed
THE
CIRCUIT
Keshwapur,
M.C. appeal
Malligwad,
THE
Bhandekar, w/o
Subhanappa
the M.F.A.
Tq. Dn.)
u/S
Harishchandra 0cc.:
HIGH
0cc.:
judgment
No.
Narayan
Dharwad.
30th
MR.
MR. is 13
001.
&
Service,
BENCH
Household No.
24/1999
COURT
filed
of
DAY
JUSTICE BEFORE
C.J.M.
Hubli-580 Advocate)
JUSTICE
the AND :1:
4595/2006
Advocate)
Kotabagi,
Kotabagi, u/S
and
OF
Hindu
AT
OF
Gaikwad,
on
Dharwad 28
MARCH
work,
decree DHARWAD
K.
KARNATAKA
RAVI
020. the
of
Marriage
L.
the
(MC)
file
MANJUNATH
dated -
MALIMATH
2012 - Hindu
dismissing of
Act,
the
Respondent
31.01.2006
Appellant
Marriage
Prl.
etc.
Civil
the THIS
FOLLOWING:
PrI.
I.
dismissing
Act
2.
appellant
lived birth
the
husband
rights
Cr1.
the
Accordingly
Civil
seeking
husband
THIS
ground Misc. Aggrieved
to
together DAY,
The
but
3
Judge
and
filed children.
the
APPEAL the facts
174/95
divorce,
RAW
that and
the
husband’s maintenance
comfortably
M.C.
petition
(Sr.
by
respondent
would
left
her
was
After
the Dn.)
this
MALIMATH,
No.
COMING
to
husband
JUDGMENT filed
was
order
appeal
petition
her &
disclose
1990,
2
:2:
1/93
was
till CJM,
by
dismissed
took
parents’
dated
is the the the
has
ordered. ON
seeking
u/S
filed place Dharwad
that
wife wife
year
31.01.2006
neglected
FOR J,
13
house.
by
for
on the
of
seeking started
DELIVERED restitution 1990.
the
Thereafter
FINAL the
default, 17.06.1978
in
marriage
husband.
Subsequently M.C.
Hindu
to
quarrelling
passed
The
maintenance
maintain HEARING
of No.
wife
the Marriage
Thereafter
between and
conjugal
by
/
24/99 THE
present
gave
they
with the
her. the
on petition
wife
3. maintenance
been petition
was wife
consequently
Consequently
ground
facts maintain
of
Court
any interference
has
desertion
allowed
a
The
would that
error
has neglect below
for deserted
of
his
facts desertion
her
been
maintenance
has
show granting
committed
wife.
in
has
would
present an
at
husband
this
been the would filed
the
rightly
that
order
Hence
husband.
appeal.
does
maintenance.
not
filed in hands
the
petition
disclose
has
the
by has dismissed
not
lie.
husband
the has
purely
:3:
been
year
of
have the
neglected
petition
Under
the
been
filed
that
2006 filed,
on
Court
legs
has
It husband the
the
is
the
by for passed
these
deliberately on to
petition.
On the
to
ground
below
divorce stand.
the
the
Cr1.
contest
specific
maintain
and
circumstances.
ground
husband
to
Misc,
Admittedly
that
that We therefore
on
that
the
neglected
case
the
there
do
that
her seeking
calls petition
on
ground
not effect. of
the
has
and the
the
the
the
the
see
for
to :4:
For the aforesaid reasonsthe appeal is dismissed.
Sdf—
Sd/ 3UDGE bvv