This Series Is Hosted by a Young Harris Alumnus, Bob Short, Class of 1951
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Richard Russell, the Senate Armed Services Committee & Oversight of America’S Defense, 1955-1968
BALANCING CONSENSUS, CONSENT, AND COMPETENCE: RICHARD RUSSELL, THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE & OVERSIGHT OF AMERICA’S DEFENSE, 1955-1968 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Joshua E. Klimas, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor David Stebenne, Advisor Professor John Guilmartin Advisor Professor James Bartholomew History Graduate Program ABSTRACT This study examines Congress’s role in defense policy-making between 1955 and 1968, with particular focus on the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), its most prominent and influential members, and the evolving defense authorization process. The consensus view holds that, between World War II and the drawdown of the Vietnam War, the defense oversight committees showed acute deference to Defense Department legislative and budget requests. At the same time, they enforced closed oversight procedures that effectively blocked less “pro-defense” members from influencing the policy-making process. Although true at an aggregate level, this understanding is incomplete. It ignores the significant evolution to Armed Services Committee oversight practices that began in the latter half of 1950s, and it fails to adequately explore the motivations of the few members who decisively shaped the process. SASC chairman Richard Russell (D-GA) dominated Senate deliberations on defense policy. Relying only on input from a few key colleagues – particularly his protégé and eventual successor, John Stennis (D-MS) – Russell for the better part of two decades decided almost in isolation how the Senate would act to oversee the nation’s defense. -
The History of Redistricting in Georgia
GEORGIA LAW REVIEW(DO NOT DELETE) 11/6/2018 8:33 PM THE HISTORY OF REDISTRICTING IN GEORGIA Charles S. Bullock III* In his memoirs, Chief Justice Earl Warren singled out the redistricting cases as the most significant decisions of his tenure on the Court.1 A review of the changes redistricting introduced in Georgia supports Warren’s assessment. Not only have the obligations to equalize populations across districts and to do so in a racially fair manner transformed the makeup of the state’s collegial bodies, Georgia has provided the setting for multiple cases that have defined the requirements to be met when designing districts. Other than the very first adjustments that occurred in the 1960s, changes in Georgia plans had to secure approval from the federal government pursuant to the Voting Rights Act. Also, the first four decades of the Redistricting Revolution occurred with a Democratic legislature and governor in place. Not surprisingly, the partisans in control of redistricting sought to protect their own and as that became difficult they employed more extreme measures. When in the minority, Republicans had no chance to enact plans on their own. Beginning in the 1980s and peaking a decade later, Republicans joined forces with black Democrats to devise alternatives to the proposals of white Democrats. The biracial, bipartisan coalition never had sufficient numbers to enact its ideas. After striking out in the legislature, African-Americans appealed to the U.S. Attorney General alleging that the plans enacted were less favorable to black interests than alternatives * Charles S. Bullock, III is a University Professor of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia where he holds the Richard B. -
The Granite Mansion: Georgia's Governor's Mansion 1924-1967
The Granite Mansion: Georgia’s Governor’s Mansion 1924-1967 Documentation for the proposed Georgia Historical Marker to be installed on the north side of the road by the site of the former 205 The Prado, Ansley Park, Atlanta, Georgia June 2, 2016 Atlanta Preservation & Planning Services, LLC Georgia Historical Marker Documentation Page 1. Proposed marker text 3 2. History 4 3. Appendices 10 4. Bibliography 25 5. Supporting images 29 6. Atlanta map section and photos of proposed marker site 31 2 Proposed marker text: The Granite Governor’s Mansion The Granite Mansion served as Georgia’s third Executive Mansion from 1924-1967. Designed by architect A. Ten Eyck Brown, the house at 205 The Prado was built in 1910 from locally- quarried granite in the Italian Renaissance Revival style. It was first home to real estate developer Edwin P. Ansley, founder of Ansley Park, Atlanta’s first automobile suburb. Ellis Arnall, one of the state’s most progressive governors, resided there (1943-47). He was a disputant in the infamous “three governors controversy.” For forty-three years, the mansion was home to twelve governors, until poor maintenance made it nearly uninhabitable. A new governor’s mansion was constructed on West Paces Ferry Road. The granite mansion was razed in 1969, but its garage was converted to a residence. 3 Historical Documentation of the Granite Mansion Edwin P. Ansley Edwin Percival Ansley (see Appendix 1) was born in Augusta, GA, on March 30, 1866. In 1871, the family moved to the Atlanta area. Edwin studied law at the University of Georgia, and was an attorney in the Atlanta law firm Calhoun, King & Spalding. -
Study Guide for the Georgia History Exemption Exam Below Are 99 Entries in the New Georgia Encyclopedia (Available At
Study guide for the Georgia History exemption exam Below are 99 entries in the New Georgia Encyclopedia (available at www.georgiaencyclopedia.org. Students who become familiar with these entries should be able to pass the Georgia history exam: 1. Georgia History: Overview 2. Mississippian Period: Overview 3. Hernando de Soto in Georgia 4. Spanish Missions 5. James Oglethorpe (1696-1785) 6. Yamacraw Indians 7. Malcontents 8. Tomochichi (ca. 1644-1739) 9. Royal Georgia, 1752-1776 10. Battle of Bloody Marsh 11. James Wright (1716-1785) 12. Salzburgers 13. Rice 14. Revolutionary War in Georgia 15. Button Gwinnett (1735-1777) 16. Lachlan McIntosh (1727-1806) 17. Mary Musgrove (ca. 1700-ca. 1763) 18. Yazoo Land Fraud 19. Major Ridge (ca. 1771-1839) 20. Eli Whitney in Georgia 21. Nancy Hart (ca. 1735-1830) 22. Slavery in Revolutionary Georgia 23. War of 1812 and Georgia 24. Cherokee Removal 25. Gold Rush 26. Cotton 27. William Harris Crawford (1772-1834) 28. John Ross (1790-1866) 29. Wilson Lumpkin (1783-1870) 30. Sequoyah (ca. 1770-ca. 1840) 31. Howell Cobb (1815-1868) 32. Robert Toombs (1810-1885) 33. Alexander Stephens (1812-1883) 34. Crawford Long (1815-1878) 35. William and Ellen Craft (1824-1900; 1826-1891) 36. Mark Anthony Cooper (1800-1885) 37. Roswell King (1765-1844) 38. Land Lottery System 39. Cherokee Removal 40. Worcester v. Georgia (1832) 41. Georgia in 1860 42. Georgia and the Sectional Crisis 43. Battle of Kennesaw Mountain 44. Sherman's March to the Sea 45. Deportation of Roswell Mill Women 46. Atlanta Campaign 47. Unionists 48. Joseph E. -
Table of Contents Fall & Spring 1996
Table of Contents Fall & Spring 1996 Special Collections Division the University of Texas at Arlington Libraries Vol. XI * No. 1& 2 * Fall & Spring '97 Table of Contents Fall and Spring 1996 Fall 1996 A Quarter-Century of Change, Controversy, and Chaos By Jerry L. Stafford In June of 1996, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram donated an addition to its Photograph Collection that included nearly 300,000 negatives dating from 1955 through 1979. The images document a quarter-century of significant changes. Stafford selects a number of events to spotlight in this photo-essay ranging from Rosa Parks and Elvis Pressley to Tom Landry and Nolan Ryan. Pitcher, Nolan Ryan. Friends Start Fall '96 with a Bang! By Gerald D. Saxon On September 1, the Friends of the UTA Libraries began their ninth years as an organization actively supporting the development and improvement of the Univesity Libraries. The article reviews the events and speakers who highlighted the year. Invitation cover for Friends September meeting showing a nineteenth century railroad bridge. John W. Carpenter, A Texas Giant By Shirley R. Rodnitzky The article focuses on the career of a man, who for more than three decades, was prominently identified with virtually every civic, charitable, and community enterprise in Dallas. The biographical narrative was made possiblewith the donation of the Carpenter Papers by his son, Ben H. Carptenter. The papers include 218 linear feet of files revealing fifty-plus years of twentieth century http://libraries.uta.edu/SpecColl/crose96/contents.htm[11/18/2010 10:59:21 AM] Table of Contents Fall & Spring 1996 Texas history. -
A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936 -
Ex-Students Ex to Get Draft WASHINGTON
College Is Cleared by Judge Sunny and Cool sunny, cool today. Clear, cool WEBMLY tonight. Cloudy, cool tomor- Red Bank, Freehold row and Friday. 1 Long Branch 7 EDITION Moninoulli County's Outstanding Home Newspaper VOJ*.«>4 NO. 61 KFD BANK, N. J. WEDNESDAY, SEFTEMBFR 22,1971 Ex-Students Ex To Get Draft WASHINGTON. (AP) - present witnesses before hlfj, man with lottery no. 125 or 130,000 inductions in the cur- the president authority to Men with low draft numbers board, requiring a local or ap- lower would be* called. Wheth- rent fiscal year that began phase out undergraduate'stu- who have lost their defer- peal board to have a quorum er it will reach 140, the cur- July 1 and 140,000 in the next dent deferments. Students ments—primarily students when hearing a registrant, rent limit for ordering pre- fiscal year, both well above who entered college or trade graduated from college in and lowering the maximum induction exams, depends on this year's expected callup. school this summer or fall June or dropouts — are ex- length of service on boards the Pentagon manpower re- won't be eligible for defer- pected to be the first called from 25 to 20 years. quirements. The biggest change in the ments, nor will future under- when the Selective Service re- Pentagon officials lave said The draft bill sets a limit of draft provided in the bill gives graduates, officials said. sumes inductions. that about 20,000 draftees Draft officials gave no in- would be needed during the dication when the first men remainder of the year, in- would be called, but said men cluding a 16,009 July-August would be in uniform within request left hanging when the two weeks after President draft authority expired Juno NiXon signs the draft measure 30. -
Harold Paulk Henderson, Sr
Harold Paulk (Hal) Henderson, Sr. Oral History Collection Series I: Ellis Arnall OH ARN 06 Carl Sanders Interviewed by Harold Paulk (Hal) Henderson, Sr. Date: June 11, 1981 CD: OH ARN 06, Tracks 1-4; 0:37:46 minutes Cassette: OH ARN 06, 0:37:21 minutes, Side One [CD: Track 1] [Cassette: Side 1] HENDERSON: Governor, if I could begin with a very obvious question. The state constitution prohibited you from succeeding yourself in ’66 [1966]. Would you have liked to succeeded yourself? SANDERS: Yes, I would have. I had a lot of programs that were underway, and I had some others that I would have liked to have inaugurated. Four years, which seems and sounds like a long time, passes very quickly when you are working as governor of the state and before you know it, your time is up. Programs that you are heavily involved with and all, you just never seem to have enough time to finish up everything you’d like to do. HENDERSON: While you were governor, did you make any efforts to have the constitution changed, where you could succeed yourself? SANDERS: No, I did not. I didn’t think at that time that the political climate would have permitted that and frankly, I was so involved with so many things, I tried to spend all the time that I could, all the time that I had, in pushing for positive accomplishments, which I think we had a great number of. And if I had gotten involved into the political thicket of trying to amend 2 the constitution to succeed myself, I probably would have cost the state a lot of time and effort and would not have been able to accomplish as much in my administration. -
Samuel Ernest Vandiver, Jr
OH Vandiver 01C Samuel Ernest Vandiver, Jr. interviewed by Mel Steeley and Ted Fitzsimmons Date: 6/25/86 Cassettes #439 (56 minutes) COPY OF ORIGINAL INTERVIEW ORIGINAL AT WEST GEORGIA UNIVERSITY Side One Fitzsimmons: Governor, we were talking about the integration of the university, and you said in making a decision you talked to a number of people, and among them Senator [Richard Brevard, Jr.] Russell. What was his advice? Vandiver: Well, I think you probably know what his situation was. He had fought these battles in the Senate for many, many years. And, of course, he knew from his practice of law and his familiarity with the law that I had no choice except to follow the law. That I couldn't, if I had defied the court, then I had no choice except to try to get the state of Georgia to secede again from the Union. And we'd tried that once and hadn't done too well that time. And so he knew that I had no choice. One thing that Betty [Sybil Elizabeth] Vandiver and I have talked about a great deal was her father was a federal judge; he was a judge of the northern district of Georgia. And he never had to deal with this situation. He knew it was probably coming, but he became ill with cancer, and he died in 1955 before this situation ever came before his court. And we've thought about it many times, that the Lord was kind to him. He would have had to rule in such a way that it would have been extremely difficult for him. -
Harold Paulk Henderson, Sr
Harold Paulk Henderson, Sr. Oral History Collection OH Vandiver 23 George Dekle Busbee Interviewed by Dr. Harold Paulk Henderson Date: 03-17-94 Cassette # 474 (26 Minutes, Side One Only) EDITED BY DR. HENDERSON Side One Henderson: This is an interview with former Governor George D. [Dekle] Busbee in his law office in Atlanta. The date is March 17, 1994. I am Dr. Hal Henderson. Good afternoon, Governor Busbee. Busbee: Good day. Henderson: Thank you very much for granting me this interview. Busbee: I'm delighted. Henderson: You served in the state House of Representatives the last two years of the [Samuel] Marvin Griffin [Sr.] administration and you served all four years of [Samuel] Ernest Vandiver's [Jr.] administration. Let me begin by asking you: what was your impression of the Marvin Griffin administration? Busbee: Well, of course, if you had to choose sides Marvin wouldn't have said that I was in his camp. I will say, however, that I was reminiscing with some people that served in the legislature with me back then and have served since I was governor, and we don't think it's as much fun as it used to be. I think he was a very colorful character and we had a great time, but I think that was former days for Georgia; that's not the era that we're in now. Henderson: Okay. How would you describe the relationship between Lieutenant Governor Vandiver and Governor Marvin Griffin? 2 Busbee: Well, the first real bitter fight that I became engaged in as a legislator was during the time that I was there [and] Marvin Griffin was governor, and we had the rural roads fight. -
Carter - Record As Governor (2)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
The original documents are located in Box 33, folder “Carter - Record as Governor (2)” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Some items in this folder were not digitized because it contains copyrighted materials. Please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library for access to these materials. Digitized from Box 33 of The Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library .- 9/14/76 TO: RON NESSEN FROM: FRED SLIGHT For your information Cloudy Plesase Call Us Considerable cloudiness With a story or picture idea today with a chance or 374-7215 showers. High, 82; low, 11 a.m. to midnight GO. (1\lap and details, Page 2A.) To subscribe• or for Saturday's Temperntvr& home delivery assistance 6 a.m. 65 12 noon 75 6 p.m. 7$ Forenwst Newspaper Of The Carolinas 8 a.m. 65 2 P.m. 79 8 p.m. 75 S74-7S22 10 a.m. -
Social Media Use in Georgia Gubernatorial Elections
Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Honors College Theses 2021 The New Open Forum: Social Media Use in Georgia Gubernatorial Elections John Mack Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses Part of the American Politics Commons, Social Influence and oliticalP Communication Commons, and the Social Media Commons Recommended Citation Mack, John, "The New Open Forum: Social Media Use in Georgia Gubernatorial Elections" (2021). Honors College Theses. 615. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/615 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The New Open Forum: Social Media Use in Georgia Gubernatorial Elections An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Political Science and International Studies By: John Mack Under the mentorship of Dr. Patrick Novotny ABSTRACT In 2018, Georgia saw one of the most contested elections in recent memory with Brian Kemp narrowly defeating Stacey Abrams. As a part of that election, social media would play a critical role in how campaigns are run. This thesis takes a look at previous literature on voter turnout and social media. This thesis asks: How did the campaigns use social media to spread their message, and in what stage of the election was social media most effective? To answer that question this thesis features a content analysis of Facebook posts and Tweets from the 2018 elections compared to posts in the 2014 elections to answer my question and to see how campaigning on social media has evolved since 2014.