DOCSLIB.ORG

April 5, 2021 Ms. Jolie Harrison Division Chief Permits And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
April 5, 2021 Ms. Jolie Harrison Division Chief Permits And April 5, 2021 Ms. Jolie Harrison Dr. Michael J. Weise Division Chief Program Manager - Marine Mammals & Permits and Conservation Biology Program Office of Protected Resources Office of Naval Research - Code 32 1315 East-West Highway 875 N. Randolph St. 13th Floor Arlington, VA 22203-1995 Silver Spring, MD, 20910 [email protected] [email protected] Dear Ms. Harrison and Dr. Weise: On behalf of the Animal Welfare Institute, I write to you regarding the research study that will involve a deliberate take of minke whales in order to conduct auditory evoked potential (AEP) hearing tests.1 The capture of these minke whales off Lofoten, Norway is planned to commence in or around May 2021, last for approximately three weeks and then resume in 2022.2 We maintain the animal welfare and human safety risks associated with this study are unacceptable and urge its cancellation. AWI understands that the research study is being co-funded by the Office of Naval Research Marine Mammal Biology program and the interagency White House Subcommittee on Ocean Science & Technology (SOST) Ocean Sound and Marine Life (OSML) Task Team, with co- funding from USN’s 6.4 Living Marine Resources program, BOEM, NOAA and the MMC.3 The purpose of this letter is to bring to your attention the deficiencies that we feel exist with respect to Norway’s permitting of this project, our concerns for the safety of the involved whales and researchers, and the legal dilemma that this sort of research poses. To be clear, AWI does not oppose all research on animals; instead, we contemplate research involving animals on a case- by-case basis and advocate for the best possible treatment of animals involved in research. Here, 1 AWI has received documentation for this project from the Norwegian government following a request under Norway’s Public Access to Information regulation, section 6, and notes that it is awaiting further results from a Freedom of Information Act request; the following letter is representative of the information we currently have at our disposal. 2 AWI is aware that the project timeline had to be amended due to the COVID pandemic 3 Again, AWI is awaiting more specifics on the US government’s funding of this project. We also understand that additional funding may be coming from the oil and gas industry. Animal Welfare Institute April 5, 2021 Page 2 we have serious concerns regarding the welfare of the whales proposed for study, including any released after deemed unsuitable for the planned research. We are equally concerned for the safety of the humans involved in the research; we believe the researchers who will be in the water with the whales will be at risk of serious injury. Project Background AWI is aware that Dr. Petter Kvadsheim of the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment (Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt (unit 053)) is leading the project in cooperation with Dr. Dorian Houser of the US-based National Marine Mammal Foundation. We understand the proposed project’s purpose is to better understand the kinds of sounds and frequencies that baleen whales can hear, including those pertaining to active sonar and seismic activities.4 AWI understands that the researchers are planning to set up a 1,300 meter long net across a strait at Vestvågøy in Lofoten. The plan is to use the net to maneuver juvenile minke whales, who will be migrating through this area on their way to foraging areas further north in the Barents Sea, into a 280 meter long, 150 meter wide and 27 meter deep enclosure between some islets in the fjord. When a whale moves into the netted-off area, the entrance will be closed and the whale trapped inside. The whale will be held in this area for 24 hours before the researchers try to measure its hearing, presumably by introducing different levels of sound to the animal and measuring the response.5 The researchers will conduct the AEP hearing testing using electrophysiological techniques and plan to optimize these techniques for measuring hearing in mysticetes. Before the experiments take place, a veterinarian from Dyreparken in Kristiansand will decide whether the animal is healthy enough to become a research subject. Before the hearing test, the whale will be moved to a modified salmon cage. The cage will be closed around the whale, which will be held between two rafts. There will be two people in the water with the whale and four on a raft. The whale’s state of health will be monitored by measuring heart rate and respiration. Researchers estimate it will take a maximum of six hours to complete the hearing testing for each whale, during which time it is claimed that the whales will likely experience “moderate distress and discomfort.” A safety protocol will be in place to minimize risk to the animal, including human end points, health monitoring in all phases, and if needed, use of sedation to reduce stress. Although the whales should not have to be stunned, stunning could take place if an emergency safety situation arises. Before the minke whales are released, they will be satellite-tagged. The tags will be used to track the whales following the research to see if they resume normal activities. 4 Email from Heidi Bugge to Peter Kvadsheim, Notification about central decision, 21 May 2019. Available upon request. 5 Proposed work plan. 2 Animal Welfare Institute April 5, 2021 Page 3 Mattilsynet has given approval to Dr. Kvadsheim to use 12 minke whales for this experiment.6 To our knowledge, the approval gives no information about any limits on the number of minke whales permitted to be chased during the attempt to corral a whale into the netted-off area, nor does it specify how many minkes maybe captured and released if they are determined not to be suitable candidates for the research. Existing Research Tells Us What We Need to Know Dolphins and other toothed whales (odontocetes), many species of which have been well-studied, use high and medium frequency sound for echolocation and communication. Baleen whales (mysticetes), however, do not have the same structures associated with echolocation. They tend to make lower frequency sounds and are able to communicate with each other across long distances. Although previous studies have indicated that baleen whales are affected by active sonar and seismic activity, more-specific data and levels of understanding are sought. AWI is aware of a number of published studies that already speak to acoustic responses in baleen whales,7 including acoustic response studies conducted on free-ranging minkes, one of them by Dr. Kvadsheim.8 This study noted: Minke whales are difficult to study and little information exists regarding their responses to anthropogenic sound. This study pools data from behavioural response studies off California and Norway. Data are derived from four tagged animals, of which one from each location was exposed to naval sonar signals. Statistical analyses were conducted using Mahalanobis distance to compare overall changes in parameters summarising dive behaviour, avoidance 6 See Module 1: National legislation – NORWAY, National and EU laws and guidance that regulate the scientific use of animals in Norway, https://org.uib.no/dyreavd/Documents/Module1NatinalLaws.pdf 7 Goldbogen, J.A., Southall, B.L., DeRuiter, S.L., Calambokidis, J., Friedlaender, A.S., Hazen, E.L., Falcone, E.A., Schorr, G.S., Douglas, A., Moretti, D.J., Kyburg, C., McKenna, M.F., and Tyack, P.L.(2013), Blue whales respond to simulated mid-frequency military sonar, Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280(1765): 20130657, https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/3837; Melcón, M. L., Cummins, A. J., Kerosky, S. M., Roche, L. K., Wiggins, S. M., & Hildebrand, J. A. (2012), Blue whales respond to anthropogenic noise. PLoS ONE 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032681; Forney, K.A., B.L. Southall, E. Slooten, S. Dawson, A.J. Read, R.W. Baird, and R.L. Brownell Jr. (2017), Nowhere to go: noise impact assessments for marine mammal populations with high site fidelity, Endangered Species Research 32: 391–413; NOAA, “Cetacean and Sound Mapping,” available at: www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/cetsound; Gomez, C., Lawson, J.W., Wright, A.J., Buren, A.D., Tollit, D., and Lesage, V. (2016), A systematic review on the behavioural response of wild marine mammals to noise: The disparity between science and policy, Canadian Journal of Zoology 94: 801–19. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/abs/10.1139/cjz-2016-0098. 8 Kvadsheim, P. H., DeRuiter, S., Sivle, L. D., Goldbogen, J., Roland-Hansen, R., Miller, P., Lam, F. A., Calambokidis, J., Friedlaender, A., Visser, F., Tyack, P. L., Kleivane, L., & Southall, B. (2017), Avoidance responses of minke whales to 1-4kHz naval sonar, Marine Pollution Bulletin 121(1-2): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.05.037. See also Kvadsheim, P., Forland, N., de Jong, K., Nyqvist, D., Grimsbø, E and Sivle, L. (2020). Effekter av støyforurensning på havmiljø – kunnskapsstatus og forvaltningsrådgiving. Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt (FFI), Havforskningsinstituttet and Miljødirektoratet, FFI- RAPPORT 20/01015. In this latter paper, it is noted that “knowledge of how the behavior of marine mammals is affected by noise pollution has increased enormously in the last 20 years…due both to increased focus on the issue, but also to a positive development in relation to methodology for studying this.” 3 Animal Welfare Institute April 5, 2021 Page 4 behaviour, and potential energetic costs of disturbance. Our quantitative analysis showed that both animals initiated avoidance behaviour, but responses were not associated with unusual dive behaviour. In one exposed animal the avoidance of the sonar source included a 5-fold increase in horizontal speed away from the source, implying a significant increase in metabolic rate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Captive Orcas
    Captive Orcas ‘Dying to Entertain You’ The Full Story A report for Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society (WDCS) Chippenham, UK Produced by Vanessa Williams Contents Introduction Section 1 The showbiz orca Section 2 Life in the wild FINgerprinting techniques. Community living. Social behaviour. Intelligence. Communication. Orca studies in other parts of the world. Fact file. Latest news on northern/southern residents. Section 3 The world orca trade Capture sites and methods. Legislation. Holding areas [USA/Canada /Iceland/Japan]. Effects of capture upon remaining animals. Potential future capture sites. Transport from the wild. Transport from tank to tank. “Orca laundering”. Breeding loan. Special deals. Section 4 Life in the tank Standards and regulations for captive display [USA/Canada/UK/Japan]. Conditions in captivity: Pool size. Pool design and water quality. Feeding. Acoustics and ambient noise. Social composition and companionship. Solitary confinement. Health of captive orcas: Survival rates and longevity. Causes of death. Stress. Aggressive behaviour towards other orcas. Aggression towards trainers. Section 5 Marine park myths Education. Conservation. Captive breeding. Research. Section 6 The display industry makes a killing Marketing the image. Lobbying. Dubious bedfellows. Drive fisheries. Over-capturing. Section 7 The times they are a-changing The future of marine parks. Changing climate of public opinion. Ethics. Alternatives to display. Whale watching. Cetacean-free facilities. Future of current captives. Release programmes. Section 8 Conclusions and recommendations Appendix: Location of current captives, and details of wild-caught orcas References The information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of last publication: 30th April 2001. Some information is inevitably date-sensitive: please notify the author with any comments or updated information.
    [Show full text]
  • THOUSAND MILE SONG Also by David Rothenberg
    THOUSAND MILE SONG Also by David Rothenberg Is It Painful to Think? Hand’s End Sudden Music Blue Cliff Record Always the Mountains Why Birds Sing THOUSAND MILE SONG Whale Music In a Sea of Sound DAVID ROTHENBERG A Member of the Perseus Books Group New York Copyright © 2008 by David Rothenberg Published by Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information, address Basic Books, 387 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10016–8810. Books published by Basic Books are available at special discounts for bulk purchases in the United States by corporations, institutions, and other organizations. For more information, please contact the Special Markets Department at the Perseus Books Group, 2300 Chestnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA 19103, or call (800) 255–1514, or e-mail [email protected]. Designed by Linda Mark Set in 12 pt Granjon by The Perseus Books Group Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rothenberg, David, 1962- Thousand mile song: whale music in a sea of sound / David Rothenberg. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-465-07128-9 (alk. paper) 1. Whales—Behavior. 2. Whale sounds. I. Title. QL737.C4R63 2008 599.5’1594—dc22 2007048161 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS 1 WE DIDN’T KNOW, WE DIDN’T KNOW: Whale Song Hits the Charts 1 2GONNA GROW
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait the Following Marine Mammals Are Common to Hudson Strait, However, Other Species May Also Be Seen
    Marine Mammals of Hudson Strait The following marine mammals are common to Hudson Strait, however, other species may also be seen. It’s possible for marine mammals to venture outside of their common habitats and may be seen elsewhere. Bowhead Whale Length: 13-19 m Appearance: Stocky, with large head. Blue-black body with white markings on the chin, belly and just forward of the tail. No dorsal fin or ridge. Two blow holes, no teeth, has baleen. Behaviour: Blow is V-shaped and bushy, reaching 6 m in height. Often alone but sometimes in groups of 2-10. Habitat: Leads and cracks in pack ice during winter and in open water during summer. Status: Special concern Beluga Whale Length: 4-5 m Appearance: Adults are almost entirely white with a tough dorsal ridge and no dorsal fin. Young are grey. Behaviour: Blow is low and hardly visible. Not much of the body is visible out of the water. Found in small groups, but sometimes hundreds to thousands during annual migrations. Habitat: Found in open water year-round. Prefer shallow coastal water during summer and water near pack ice in winter. Killer Whale Status: Endangered Length: 8-9 m Appearance: Black body with white throat, belly and underside and white spot behind eye. Triangular dorsal fin in the middle of the back. Male dorsal fin can be up to 2 m in high. Behaviour: Blow is tall and column shaped; approximately 4 m in height. Narwhal Typically form groups of 2-25. Length: 4-5 m Habitat: Coastal water and open seas, often in water less than 200 m depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton's and Melville's Flawed Revolutionaries
    “I’d Strike the Son if He Insulted Me: Milton’s and Melville’s Flawed Revolutionaries” Benjamin Platt English Honors Thesis Advised by Professors Harvey Hix and Michael Edson Table of Contents: Introduction: The Flawed Revolutionary 2 Chapter 1: Satan in Paradise Lost 10 The Monarchical Father and the Regicidal Milton: 12 The Fall of Satan 27 Chapter 2: Ahab in Moby Dick; or, the Whale 44 Melville’s Democratic Drive 44 Ahab’s Satanic Descendancy 48 “Dark Ahab’s” Tyranny and Isolation 51 Potential Redemption in Pip and Starbuck 61 Burgeoning Democracy Amidst Tyranny 68 Conclusion: Human Potential and Felix Culpa 76 The “Happy” Consequences of Satan’s Rebellion 78 Ishmael, the Prophet of Democracy 82 Platt - 1 Introduction: The Flawed Revolutionary John Milton (1608-1674) and Herman Melville (1819-1891) loom large over their respective national literatures; Milton’s writing dominates the English poetic landscape while Melville’s magnum opus makes its case as “the great American novel,” a title that recognizes the national and political nature of textual works. In both Paradise Lost (1667) and Moby Dick ​ ​ ​ (1851), a distinctly political vein can be detected, and these works contain incredibly similar characters, Satan and Ahab, who, in their kinship, seem to point to a consistent philosophy of political progression between these two texts that lines up with the ideologies of Milton’s and Melville’s other writings. John Milton was an outspoken critic of the English monarchy during the English Civil War (1642-1651). He railed against tyranny and the monarchy during a polemical career that carried him into a position in the cabinet of Lord Protector Cromwell after the execution of Charles I in 1649.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorinated Organic Contaminants in Blubber Biopsies from Northwestern Atlantic Balaenopterid Whales Summering in the Gulf of St Lawrence
    Marine Environmental Research, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 201-223, 1997 0 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain PII: SOl41-1136(97)00004-4 0141-1136/97 $17.00+0.00 Chlorinated Organic Contaminants in Blubber Biopsies from Northwestern Atlantic Balaenopterid Whales Summering in the Gulf of St Lawrence J. M. Gauthier,a* C. D. Metcalfe” & R. Sear@ “Environmental and Resources Studies, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada K9J 7B8 bMingan Island Cetacean Study (MICS), 285 Green, St. Lambert, Quebec, Canada J4P IT3 (Received 16 May 1996; revised version received 16 December 1996; accepted 29 December 1996. Published June 1997) ABSTRACT Concentrations and patterns of chlorinated biphenyls (CBS) and other persistent organochlorine compounds (OCs) were determined from small blubber biopsy samples collected from northwestern Atlantic minke (Balaenoptera acuros- trata) , fin (Balaenoptera physalus), blue (Balaenoptera musculus) , and humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae) whales summering in the Gurf of St. Lawrence, Quebec. Concentrations of CPCB (sum of 19 congeners) in biopsy samples ranged from 0.2-10 pg g-’ lipid, and congeners 52, 101, 118, 153, 138 and 180 accounted for 79% of CPCB. Mean concentration of the sum of non- ortho CB congeners in selected biopsy samples was 2 ng g-t lipid, and relative concentrations of these analytes were: 77 > 126 > 81> 169. Concentrations of XDDT ranged from 0.613 pg g-t lipid, and the average proportion of DDE to CDDT was 72%. All other organochlorine analytes were present at concentra- tions below 2 pg g-t lipid. On average, cis-nonachlor, trans-nonachlor and oxy- chlordane accounted for 27, 26 and 23%, respectively, of the chlordane-related analytes, and cl-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) comprised 67% of XHCH.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 162/Friday, August 21, 2015/Notices
    50990 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 162 / Friday, August 21, 2015 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE An authorization for incidental scan sonar, geophysical resistivity takings shall be granted if NMFS finds meters, and magnetometer to National Oceanic and Atmospheric that the taking will have a negligible characterize the bottom surface and Administration impact on the species or stock(s), will subsurface. The planned shallow RIN 0648–XE018 not have an unmitigable adverse impact geotechnical investigations include on the availability of the species or vibracoring, sediment grab sampling, Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to stock(s) for subsistence uses (where and piezo-cone penetration testing Specified Activities; Taking Marine relevant), and if the permissible (PCPT) to directly evaluate seabed Mammals Incidental to Geophysical methods of taking and requirements features and soil conditions. and Geotechnical Survey in Cook Inlet, pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring Geotechnical borings are planned at Alaska and reporting of such takings are set potential shoreline crossings and in the forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible terminal boring subarea within the AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘an Marine Terminal survey area, and will Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and impact resulting from the specified be used to collect information on the Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), activity that cannot be reasonably mechanical properties of in-situ soils to Commerce. expected to, and is not reasonably likely support feasibility studies for ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental to, adversely affect the species or stock construction crossing techniques and harassment authorization. through effects on annual rates of decisions on siting and design of pilings, dolphins, and other marine SUMMARY: NMFS is issuing an recruitment or survival.’’ structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Offerings 1/2/08 7:33 AM
    Hawaii Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary: Special Offerings 1/2/08 7:33 AM KIHEI FACILITIES PROJECT Return to Special Offerings Main Page Background Frequently Purpose Introduction Asked and Background Comments Photos Questions Need The office building before being acquired by NOAA and after renovation by the sanctuary's dedicated volunteers. PROJECT LOCATION Although the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary (HIHWNMS) itself covers an area of about 3626 square kilometers [1,400 square http://hawaiihumpbackwhale.noaa.gov/special_offerings/sp_off/kfp/KFP_background.html Page 1 of 10 Hawaii Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary: Special Offerings 1/2/08 7:33 AM miles] in the waters of the Main Hawaiian Islands, this project is located on a land- based parcel that houses the sanctuary's Maui headquarters. The headquarters are located at 726 South Kihei Road in Kihei, Maui, Hawai‘i, on property owned by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The NOS Kihei sanctuary property is located within TMK (2) 3-9-01:87 on Lot 2-2 and occupies 0.457 hectares [1.13 acres] or 4572.9 square meters [49,223 square feet]. The waters off the coast at this location are part of the sanctuary. NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE (NOS) KIHEI FACILITY BACKGROUND The NOS Kihei sanctuary headquarters property was developed in 1940 for use by the U.S. Navy for classified activities. The first buildings consisted of the main three- story building and the garage (now storage building). In the mid-1950s a generator shed (now small storage shed) and electronics building (now Education Center) were added.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysalis 1967
    1967 chrvsalis . JI chrysalis 1967 volume 10 Table of Contents Untitled Barbara Buckler 2 Haiku Carolyn Hall 3 Haiku Carolyn Hall 3 Ode to a Mud Puddle Jennifer Vane 3 Where? Carolyn Hall 4 5:30 P. M. Crucifixion D. Anne Gregory 4 Birth and Death Peggy Horne 4 Haiku Carol Ann Green 4 Ducdame Jennifer Vane 5 Untitled Carolyn Hall 5 The Dandy General Sandra Hoy 6 Haiku Susan F. Kerby 7 Transition Pat Merchant 8 The Trial Augie Knott , 9 True Poem Complete with Shipwreck Cheryl Comer 13 The Rose of Bethany Suzanne Lewis 15 Untitled Suzanne Lewis 15 April Faye Carol Mitchell 16 Haiku Carolyn Hall 16 Haiku Carolyn Hall 16 A Path to Night Suzanne Lewis 17 Haiku Suzanne Lewis 17 Haiku Carolyn Hall 17 Untitled Carolyn Hall 17 To Trust an Angel Augie Knott 18 The Poet's Heart Suzanne Lewis 22 The Sea-Personified Ellen Tillery 23 Haiku Carolyn Hall 23 Things I Have Lost Peggy Horne 24 Sundays in Baltimore Mary Rubenstein 25 The Choice Barbara Ann Bell 25 Psychologically Pslumming while Pthumbing through Goose Cheryl Comer 26 Occasional Poem Jennifer Vane 26 Hauteur #2 Carolyn Hall 26 Some Thoughts on Water Alice Evelyn Liggett 27 cover design by Nancy Gilliam A Stmpf, St .. 9f, man A simple, single human seedling falls upon the world's soil. Carried by winds, worn by its own hot raindrops, Misused and abusing, It gropes for a small place into which the roots might extend And hold life firm and full. Such delicate sustenance is needed for full fruition: Life is felt only through an interchange between the very substances which determine the essential selfness of all which are.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Right Whale Vessel Speed Rule Assessment
    North Atlantic Right Whale (Eubalaena glacialis) Vessel Speed Rule Assessment June 2020 NOAA Fisheries, Office of Protected Resources EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) remains one of the most endangered large whales in the world with an estimated population size of about 400 individuals at the end of 2018 (Pace et al. 2017; Hayes et al. 2019). Despite decades of protection, a combination of anthropogenic impacts and a low calving rate continue to impede recovery of the species (Kraus et al. 2016; Corkeron et al. 2018; Hayes et al. 2019). The most pressing threats to right whale survival include entanglement in fishing gear and collisions with vessels, which combined are responsible for a minimum of 86 mortalities and serious injuries in the U.S. and Canada between 2000 and 2017 (Waring et al. 2004; Waring et al. 2009; Waring et al. 2013; Hayes et al. 2019) representing approximately 20% of the extant population. In 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) implemented a seasonal, mandatory vessel speed rule in certain areas along the U.S. East Coast to reduce the risk of vessel collisions with right whales. We conducted a review of the speed rule to evaluate how effective it is at reducing the incidence of right whale mortality and serious injury due to vessel strikes and where it could be improved. While it is not possible to determine a direct causal link, the number of documented vessel strike mortalities and serious injuries decreased from 12 during the 10 years prior to the rule’s implementation to 8 in the 10 years since implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dall's Porpoise
    Dall’s Porpoise Phocoenoides dalli, commonly known as the Dall’s porpoise, is most easily recognized by its unique black and white markings similar to those of a killer whale/orca. It was named by the American naturalist William Healey Dall who was the first to collect a specimen. The Dall’s porpoise is capable of swimming in excess of 30 knots and is often seen riding along side the bows of boats. General description: The Dall’s porpoise is black with white markings. Most commonly the animal will be mostly black with large white sections on the sides, belly, on the edges of the flukes, and around the dorsal fin, though there are exceptions to this pattern. The Dall’s porpoise is born at an approximate size of 3ft. The average size of an adult is 6.4 ft and weighs approximately 300 lbs. The body is stocky and more powerful than other members of phocoenidae (porpoises). The head is small and lacks a distinct beak. The flippers are small, pointed, and located near the head. The dorsal fin is triangular in shape with a hooked tip. The mouth of the Dall’s porpoise is small and has a slight underbite. Food habits: Dall’s porpoises eat a wide variety of prey species. In some areas they eat squid, but in other areas they may feed on small schooling fishes such as capelin, lantern fish (Myctophids), and herring. They generally forage at night. Life history: Female Dall’s porpoises reach sexual maturity at between 3 and 6 years of age and males around 5 to 8 years, though there is little known about their mating habits.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Small Cetaceans. Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats
    Review of Small Cetaceans Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats by Boris M. Culik Illustrations by Maurizio Wurtz, Artescienza Marine Mammal Action Plan / Regional Seas Reports and Studies no. 177 Published by United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Review of Small Cetaceans. Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats. 2004. Compiled for CMS by Boris M. Culik. Illustrations by Maurizio Wurtz, Artescienza. UNEP / CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 343 pages. Marine Mammal Action Plan / Regional Seas Reports and Studies no. 177 Produced by CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany in collaboration with UNEP Coordination team Marco Barbieri, Veronika Lenarz, Laura Meszaros, Hanneke Van Lavieren Editing Rüdiger Strempel Design Karina Waedt The author Boris M. Culik is associate Professor The drawings stem from Prof. Maurizio of Marine Zoology at the Leibnitz Institute of Wurtz, Dept. of Biology at Genova Univer- Marine Sciences at Kiel University (IFM-GEOMAR) sity and illustrator/artist at Artescienza. and works free-lance as a marine biologist. Contact address: Contact address: Prof. Dr. Boris Culik Prof. Maurizio Wurtz F3: Forschung / Fakten / Fantasie Dept. of Biology, Genova University Am Reff 1 Viale Benedetto XV, 5 24226 Heikendorf, Germany 16132 Genova, Italy Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.fh3.de www.artescienza.org © 2004 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) / Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Relocating the American Dream. the America of the 1960S As Portrayed
    Relocating the American Dream The America of the 1960s as Portrayed by the New Journalists Norman Mailer, Hunter S. Thompson, and Tom Wolfe Master's Thesis Department of English University of Helsinki Supervisor: Bo Pettersson Date: 25.3.2009 Meri Laitinen 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................3 1.1 Aims and methods ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Defining new journalism............................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.1 Norman Mailer ........................................................................................................................................ 16 1.2.2 Hunter S. Thompson................................................................................................................................17 1.2.3 Tom Wolfe............................................................................................................................................... 18 1.3 Defining the American Dream...................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.1 Origins of the term................................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.2 The American Dream in popular culture ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]