DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Fall of 1977, He Researched and Conducted a Seminar In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Fall of 1977, He Researched and Conducted a Seminar In The Bakke Case and the University of Pennsylvania (Meyerson) SPEAKING OUT " NEWS " GRANT DEADLINES LEAVES " United Way " THINGS TO DO SUPPLEMENT: Bakke Brief Published Weekly by the University of Pennsylvania Volume 24, Number 8 October 25, 1977 FREEZE ON HIRING The State appropriation request for the University includes million for On October 21, President Martin Meyerson put into effect the approximately $7 the Medical, Dental and Veterinary schools and million for student aid and first in a series of contingency actions to deal with the $10 general instruction, which is divided the rest of the appropriation and tax impasse in Harrisburg: a suspension of all among University's programs. The Senate has for hiring and internal transfer of staff. On the same day a group of already passed non-preferred appropriations Penn State. and Lincoln. The faculty Senate leaders and deans began a series of meetings with Temple, Pittsburgh Legislature meantime must still find a of the the Provost and the President on steps for dealing with the way funding appropriations. financial future. University's BAKKE BRIEF: IN ALMANAC HARRISBURG: CALL FOR REVERSAL In this issue Almanac publishes the full text of the Bakke Brief The Pennsylvania State Senate is expected to decide before (see supplement). There is also a statement by President Meyerson Friday whether to vote again on the $17 million appropriation bill explaining how the brief came into being and why he felt it was for the University. The Legislature is scheduled to recess Thursday important for the University to take this stand (page 2). evening until November 14. Last Tuesday, the Senate voted against the bill, which fell two NURSING: NEW DEANS votes short of the two-thirds majority of 34 needed for passing To lead several new programs as well as strengthen existing non-preferred appropriations. As the press has reported, the ones. Dean Claire M. Fagin has appointed three new deans to the University's labor dispute with the Teamsters Local 115 was faculty of the School of Nursing. instrumental in the outcome of the vote. The State House of Dr. Florence S. Downs has been appointed associate dean to Representatives narrowly approved the University's appropriation direct the new doctoral program as well as other graduate in late September. Continued on page 4 On Labor Relations and the State Appropriation The University of Pennsylvania has been urged by its Trustees, by the in force. We recently negotiated successfully with the AFSCME for legislature and the state executive, by the Federal government, and by our increased productivity, hence economy, in our dining services. We selected students and their parents to be frugal and reduce costs. We are asked to external maintenance contractors only when they assured us they save without reducing quality in education or in research. In response to this themselves have union contracts. steady pressure to cut expense, we are closing a diploma program and a In addition, we have taken steps to ease the difficulties for our school, and we have divested ourselves of one of two wholly owned housekeeping employees whose jobs were displaced. Besides severance pay, hospitals. Tuition has consistently risen, and our students, half of whom continuation of various benefits. and other assistance, we have offered already receive financial aid, have become more and more pressed to pay for placement help to all, and we have guaranteed comparable employment in their education. the University or elsewhere to those with any significant seniority. These But in universities, the only possible savings of substantial sums are offers are not being taken: the Teamsters are pressuring our former through personnel savings. Thus in 1975-76 we maintained a general salary employees from accepting our help or these jobs. freeze for six months; in recent years, the real wages of our faculty and State Senators who wish to withhold from the University the administrative staff have actually declined. Before the start of this past Commonwealth funds that we have received for generations have summer, we had laid off over 200 faculty and administrative staff. In short interjected the legislative process-designed to protect the interests of we have pared our budget in every way available to us, all the while Pennsylvania's citizens -into labor relations. absorbing vast increases in the costs of energy and fuel, books, insurance, If a claim is made that the University has not bargained fairly or financial aid and the like. sufficiently, the matter is properly a judicial one for the National Labor Despite these measures, we closed the last fiscal year in deficit. Even with Relations Board and perhaps ultimately for the courts. Such a charge has the full Commonwealth appropriation available to us, we still face the been made. The University has also filed against the Teamsters charges that prospect of.a $4-5 million deficit with which to cope in the year ahead. they have engaged in an illegal secondary boycott and have coerced present It is in this setting that we had been examining for several years the costs and former University employees. of our internal housekeeping operations. In the budgeting process these rhe recent Senate vote to block the University's appropriation is, quite costs were projected for the present academic year at over $4.5 million -far simply, counterproductive. It contradicts the demand for efficiency that higher by any unit of measure than housekeeping costs for any comparable Senators have joined others in voicing. Moreover, no jobs can be saved by institution in the region. Our estimates, later confirmed by our auditors, forcing the University to cut programs and services. Hundreds of staff, showed a savings of more than $750,000 a year from the use of professional many of whom are low-paid workers, will lose jobs if the University is maintenance contractors who are expert in management of such operations, crippled by this action. As the largest non-governmental employer in as we are not. We asked the Teamsters- -as we asked the independent Philadelphia. the University nowcontributes enormously to the economy of Building Service and Maintenance Workers before them if they would the city and the region. If a business of anywhere near comparable size and help us find savings that might develop an alternative to outside significance to the city's well-being were threatened, every area political contractors. We received no assistance from either, and in the case of the leader would rightly be working to preserve the jobs and other economic Teamsters we were presented not with possible economies, but with a benefits produced by that business. I am saddened that some do not seem to proposed contract that would have cost about $850,000 more than our realize these practical consequences to the loss of our State appropriation. present budget, for a total one-year difference between Teamster demands Above all, if the Senate action is not reversed, a unique Commonwealth and the service contracts of more than $1.6 million. When negotiations concentration of resources for education and health service will be reached an impasse, we accepted maintenance contractors' bids. decimated. Not only will students and staff suffer from its loss of quality, Our decision to discontinue internal housekeeping operations was but the Commonwealth will have undermined irreparably that advanced therefore a financial one and not an anti-union one. Over many years, we institution which makes an unsurpassed contribution, through its learning have developed an excellent record of working closely with unions on our and its scientific and technical research, to the economy, the culture, the -- Meyerson campus: II bargaining agreements with four different unions are currently health and the very well-being of Pennsylvania. Martin The Bakke Case and the University of Pennsylvania hr Martin Meyerson October 20. 1977 Throughout my academic life, 1 have opposed the notion that a constraints of a June 7 deadline for filing and the difficulties of university ought regularly to take stands on the issues current in writingjointly for institutions which, as the brief puts it, "differ in public discourse. Uniquely in contemporary society, a university geography and history, in size, in resources, and in structure."Thus ought to be an arena for the open presentation of views on varied they delegated to representatives of four institutions-Columbia, sides of public questions. The principle of neutrality should be Harvard, Stanford, and Pennsylvania-the task of preparing a modified, it seems to me, only when the issue under discussion calls draft. into question the fundamental values on which a university is During the drafting process, both through my interest in the founded. High among those values is institutional autonomy: the matter and through the involvement of Dean Pollak and Mr. acknowledgement of each university's right to decide for itself, as Burbank, I was kept apprised of the arguments to be presented. Felix Frankfurter said, who may teach, what may be taught, how it Any reservations that occurred to me were counterbalanced by the shall be taught, and who shall be taught. Such independence was central thrust of the brief: autonomy in educational functions must placed in the balance by the decision of the Supreme Court of be maintained for the independent university. Both the provostand California in the case of Allan Bakke. I read and approved the second draft of the briefin this light. The The question has been raised of how the decision was taken to brief in no way appeared to us toenunciate any concepts or policies join in an amicus curiae brief in the case. From time to time, new to Pennsylvania, rather quite the contrary. To search for occasions occur when I must decide how best to reflect the sense of consensus on the mode of expression of established principles our institution.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NOTICES Was Sent to Press, the Meeting Dates Which Fall Rather Far in the Future Are Subject Tr Change
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Nottces Edited by GORDON L. WALKER Contents MEETINGS Calendar of Meetings • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • 4 Program of the February Meeting in Tucson • • • . • . • . • . 5 Abstracts for the Meeting, pp. 80-84 Program of the February Meeting in New York ••••••••• 10 Abstracts for the Meeting, pp. 85-94 PRELIMINARY ANNOUNCEMENTS OF MEETINGS ••••••.••• 15 ACTIVITIES OF OTHER ASSOCIATIONS ••••••••••••••••• 19 NEWS ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS •••••••••••••••••• 27 FOREIGN SCIENCE INFORMATION •••••••••.•••••••••• 38 PERSONAL ITEMS •••••••.•••••••••.••••••••••••• 47 NEW PUBLICATIONS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••. 50 CATALOGUE OF LECTURE NOTES - Supplement No.1 . • • • • • 57 ABSTRACTS OF CONTRIBUTED PAPERS • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • 59 RESERVATION FORM . • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • . • • • • • • 99 3 MEETINGS CALENDAR OF MEETINGS NOTE: This Calendar lists all of the meetings which have been approved by the Council up to the date at which this issue of the NOTICES was sent to press, The meeting dates which fall rather far in the future are subject tr change. This is particularly true of the meetings to which no numbers have yet been assigned, Meet­ Deadline ing Date Place for No, Abstracts* 567 April 14-16, 1960 New York, New York Mar. 1 568 April 22-23, 1960 Chicago, Illinois Mar, 1 569 April 22-23, 1960 Berkeley, California Mar, 570 June 18, 1960 Missoula, Montana May 5 571 August 29-September 3, 1960 East Lansing, Michigan July 15 (65th Summer Meeting) 572 October 22, 1960 Worcester, Massachusetts Sept. 8 January 24-27, 1961 Washington, D. C. (67th Annual Meeting) August, 1961 Stillwater, Oklahoma (66th Summer Meeting) January, 1962 Kansas City, Missouri (68th Annual Meeting) August, 1962 Vancouver, British Columbia (67th Summer Meeting) August, 1963 Boulder, Colorado (68th Summer Meeting) *The abstracts of papers to be presented at the meetings must be received i.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematicians at Stockholm, the Council of the Society Will Meet Sweden
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 9, NUMBER 4 ISSUE NO. 62 AUGUST 1962 THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Edited by John W. Green and Gordon L. Walker CONTENTS MEETINGS Calendar of Meetings .•.......•.•.•...•.....•......••••.•. 248 Program of the Summer Meeting in Vancouver, B. C .•.............. 249 Abstracts of the Meeting - pages 284-313 PRELIMINARY ANNOUNCEMENT OF MEETING •..•.••...........•..•. 263 ACTIVITIES OF OTHER ASSOCIATIONS .••.••••..•.....•.........••• 265 NEWS ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS .••.•.....••.....•.•. 262, 267,276 PERSONAL ITEMS .•..•.••.....•.•.•.•.....................•. 268 NEW AMS PUBLICATIONS •.....•..••••.....•••....•.....•.•...• 273 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR ....•....•....•.......•..••.......•.. 274 MEMORANDA TO MEMBERS The National Register of Scientific and Technical Personnel . • • . • . • . 2 77 The Employment Register ....••.••.•.•...•.•.•.•.•..••....• 277 The Combined Membership List, 1962-1963 •...•.....•.....•...•. 277 Corporate Members •.••...............•.•....•.....•••..• 278 The Australian Mathematical Society . 278 Backlog of Mathematical Research Journals • . • . • . • . 279 SUPPLEMENTARY PROGRAM - NO. 12 . • . 280 ABSTRACTS OF CONTRIBUTED PAPERS ...•.............••.....•.• 284 INDEX TO ADVERTISERS ...•...•..•..•.....•.....•............ 355 RESERVATION FORM . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • . 3 55 MEETINGS CALENDAR OF MEETINGS NOTE: This Calendar lists all of the meetings which have been approved by the Council up to the date at which this issue of the NOTICES was sent to press. The summer and annual meetings
    [Show full text]
  • From Schouten to Mackenzie: Notes on Brackets
    From Schouten to Mackenzie: notes on brackets∗ Yvette Kosmann-Schwarzbach In Memory of Kirill Mackenzie (1951–2020) Abstract In this paper, dedicated to the memory of Kirill Mackenzie, I relate the origins and early development of the theory of graded Lie brackets, first in the pu- blications on differential geometry of Schouten, Nijenhuis, and Fr¨olicher–Nijenhuis, then in the work of Gerstenhaber and Nijenhuis–Richardson in cohomology theory. Keywords: graded Lie algebra, Schouten bracket, Nijenhuis torsion, Fr¨olicher– Nijenhuis bracket, Nijenhuis–Richardson bracket, Gerstenhaber algebra, Macken- zie theory. Introduction Many aspects of the contributions of Kirill Mackenzie to the theory of Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids, in particular to that of the double and multiple structures, are already classical and often cited. As a tribute to his memory, arXiv:2105.14828v1 [math.HO] 31 May 2021 I shall survey the history of the emergence of some theories that were tools – among many others – in the development and description of his mathematics. In his General Theory of Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids, in 2005, Mackenzie inserted a section of “Notes” at the end of each chapter. Yet he ad- vised his readers that his notes were “not comprehensive historical surveys”. After the chapter “Cohomology and Schouten calculus for Lie algebroids”, he wrote: “The Schouten bracket of multivector fields on a manifold goes back to Schouten [1954] and Nijenhuis [1955]. The same alge- braic structures on the cohomology of associative algebras were introduced by Gerstenhaber [1963].” ∗To appear in the Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2021. 1 I shall try to expand on these elements of a story, and survey some of the early developments in the theory of the various graded brackets that Mackenzie cited and used1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Newsletter
    2015 NEWSLETTER DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS This newsletter is published annually for alumni & friends of Mathematics at the University of Washington 1 as an associate professor. In addition to his outstanding research and teaching, Jayadev founded and ran the Illinois Geometry Lab, which brought faculty and graduate students together with undergraduates to As I approach the halfway point of my term as chair, I continue foster undergraduate research. In addition, it engaged to delight in the successes of our students and faculty. You community members across the state with activities will learn about these stories in the pages that follow. Let me from Urbana-Champaign to Chicago. Jayadev has preview some of them here. begun to establish a similar program—the Washington Experimental Mathematics Lab—here. I can’t wait to For the sixth year in a row and the twelfth year in the past see the results. fourteen, one of our math majors received the Dean’s Medal in the Natural Sciences. I imagined that our streak couldn’t Inevitably, in parallel with the arrival of the new continue, but that was before I received letters of support comes the departure of others. This year, we lost Albert for David Jekel from faculty in both Math and Classics, his Nijenhuis, a member of our faculty from 1956 to 1964 other major. I knew then that we had a winner, given that the before moving to the University of Pennsylvania, and Classics faculty were as in awe of David’s talents as our own. then an affiliate faculty member upon retirement, when He is now off to UCLA to continue his mathematical studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Geometry, Volume
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/pspum/003 DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD SYMPOSIUM IN PURE MATHEMATICS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Held at the University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona February 18-19, 1960 With the Support of the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CARL B. ALLENDOERFER EDITOR PROCEEDINGS OF SYMPOSIA IN PURE MATHEMATICS VOLUME III DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND 1961 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 50-1183 Prepared by the American Mathematical Society under Grant No. NSF-G10809 with the National Science Foundation Copyright © 1961 by the American Mathematical Society Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved except those granted to the United States Government. Otherwise, this book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publishers. CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION vii A Report on the Unitary Group 1 By RAOUL BOTT Vector Bundles and Homogeneous Spaces 7 By M. F. ATIYAH and F. HIRZEBRUCH A Procedure for Killing Homotopy Groups of Differentiable Manifolds . 39 By JOHN MILNOR Some Remarks on Homological Analysis and Structures ........ 56 By D. C. SPENCER Vector Form Methods and Deformations of Complex Structures .... 87 By ALBERT NIJENHUIS Almost-Product Structures 94 By A. G. WALKER Homology of Principal Bundles 101 By ELD ON DYER and R. K. LASH OF Alexander-Pontrjagin Duality in Function Spaces 109 By JAMES EELLS, JR. The Cohomology of Lie Rings 130 By RICHARD S. PALAIS On the Theory of Solvmanifolds and Generalization with Applications to Differential Geometry 138 By Louis AUSLANDER Homogeneous Complex Contact Manifolds 144 By WILLIAM M.
    [Show full text]
  • Enumerative and Algebraic Combinatorics in the 1960'S And
    Enumerative and Algebraic Combinatorics in the 1960's and 1970's Richard P. Stanley University of Miami (version of 17 June 2021) The period 1960{1979 was an exciting time for enumerative and alge- braic combinatorics (EAC). During this period EAC was transformed into an independent subject which is even stronger and more active today. I will not attempt a comprehensive analysis of the development of EAC but rather focus on persons and topics that were relevant to my own career. Thus the discussion will be partly autobiographical. There were certainly deep and important results in EAC before 1960. Work related to tree enumeration (including the Matrix-Tree theorem), parti- tions of integers (in particular, the Rogers-Ramanujan identities), the Redfield- P´olya theory of enumeration under group action, and especially the repre- sentation theory of the symmetric group, GL(n; C) and some related groups, featuring work by Georg Frobenius (1849{1917), Alfred Young (1873{1940), and Issai Schur (1875{1941), are some highlights. Much of this work was not concerned with combinatorics per se; rather, combinatorics was the nat- ural context for its development. For readers interested in the development of EAC, as well as combinatorics in general, prior to 1960, see Biggs [14], Knuth [77, §7.2.1.7], Stein [147], and Wilson and Watkins [153]. Before 1960 there are just a handful of mathematicians who did a sub- stantial amount of enumerative combinatorics. The most important and influential of these is Percy Alexander MacMahon (1854-1929). He was a highly original pioneer, whose work was not properly appreciated during his lifetime except for his contributions to invariant theory and integer parti- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cohomology of Koszul–Vinberg Algebras
    Pacific Journal of Mathematics THE COHOMOLOGY OF KOSZUL–VINBERG ALGEBRAS MICHEL NGUIFFO BOYOM Volume 225 No. 1 May 2006 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 225, No. 1, 2006 THE COHOMOLOGY OF KOSZUL–VINBERG ALGEBRAS MICHEL NGUIFFO BOYOM We study an intrinsic cohomology theory of Koszul–Vinberg algebras and their modules. Our results may be regarded as improvements of the attempt by Albert Nijenhuis in 1969. In particular, we completely solve a fundamen- tal problem raised by M. Gerstenhaber. A short appendix is devoted to the relationships between our results and the pioneering work of Nijenhuis. Introduction According to M. Gerstenhaber [1964], “every restricted deformation theory gener- ates its proper cohomology theory”. The deformation theory of associative algebras and their modules involves the Hochschild cohomology theory of associative alge- bras, and that of Lie algebras involves the Chevalley–Eilenberg cohomology theory of Lie algebras. The first attempt to define a cohomology theory of Koszul–Vinberg algebras goes back to Albert Nijenhuis [1968]. Recently his pioneering results were rediscovered in [Chapoton and Livernet 2001; Dzhumadil’daev 1999]. The role played by Koszul–Vinberg algebras in differential geometry and in algebraic- analytic geometry is quite important [Koszul 1968; Milnor 1977; Vey 1968; Vin- berg 1963; Vinberg and Kac 1967]. The deformation theory of these algebras is also related to Poisson manifolds [Nguiffo Boyom 2005] and to the theory of quantization deformation, to be discussed in a forthcoming work. The main aim of the present work is to initiate an intrinsic cohomology theory of Koszul–Vinberg algebras and their modules, or KV-cohomology. We focus on relationships between this cohomology theory and some classical problems: H 0(Ꮽ, · ) ←→ Ꮽ-equivariant objects, H 1(Ꮽ, · ) ←→ extensions of Ꮽ-modules, H 2(Ꮽ, · ) ←→ extension classes of algebras, H 2(Ꮽ, · ) ←→ deformation theory of algebraic structures, H 3(Ꮽ, · ) ←→ formal deformations of algebraic structures.
    [Show full text]
  • LA-Courant Algebroids and Their Applications. by David Scott Li
    LA-Courant algebroids and their applications. by David Scott Li-Bland A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Mathematics University of Toronto Copyright c 2012 by David Scott Li-Bland Abstract LA-Courant algebroids and their applications. David Scott Li-Bland Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Mathematics University of Toronto 2012 In this thesis we develop the notion of LA-Courant algebroids, the infinitesimal analogue of multiplicative Courant algebroids. Specific applications include the integration of q- Poisson (d; g)-structures, and the reduction of Courant algebroids. We also introduce the notion of pseudo-Dirac structures, (possibly non-Lagrangian) subbundles W ⊆ E of a Courant algebroid such that the Courant bracket endows W naturally with the structure of a Lie algebroid. Specific examples of pseudo-Dirac structures arise in the theory of q-Poisson (d; g)-structures. ii Dedication To Esther, the love of my life, and to Wesley, the apple of our eyes. Thanks be to God for his blessings. Acknowledgements I would like to thank my father, John Bland, for inspiring a love of mathematics in me. I would like to thank my supervisor, Eckhard Meinrenken, for his guidance, patience, advice, encouragement and help over the years. I would like to thank Pavol Severaˇ for many delightful conversations, explanations, perspectives, and the math he taught me. I would like to thank Alfonso Gracia-Saz and Rajan Mehta for teaching me supergeometry and the theory of double and LA-vector bundles. I would like to thank Alejandro Cabrera for many interesting discussions and teaching me about tangent prolongations.
    [Show full text]
  • From Schouten to Mackenzie: Notes on Brackets
    JOURNAL OF GEOMETRIC MECHANICS doi:10.3934/jgm.2021010 ©American Institute of Mathematical Sciences FROM SCHOUTEN TO MACKENZIE: NOTES ON BRACKETS Yvette Kosmann-Schwarzbach Paris, France In Memory of Kirill Mackenzie (1951{2020) Abstract. In this paper, dedicated to the memory of Kirill Mackenzie, I relate the origins and early development of the theory of graded Lie brackets, first in the publications on differential geometry of Schouten, Nijenhuis, and Fr¨olicher{ Nijenhuis, then in the work of Gerstenhaber and Nijenhuis{Richardson in co- homology theory. Introduction. Many aspects of the contributions of Kirill Mackenzie to the theory of Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids, in particular to that of the double and multiple structures, are already classical and often cited. As a tribute to his memory, I shall survey the history of the emergence of some theories that were tools { among many others { in the development and description of his mathematics. In his General Theory of Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids, in 2005, Mackenzie inserted a section of \Notes" at the end of each chapter. Yet he advised his read- ers that his notes were \not comprehensive historical surveys". After the chapter \Cohomology and Schouten calculus for Lie algebroids", he wrote: \The Schouten bracket of multivector fields on a manifold goes back to Schouten [1954] and Nijenhuis [1955]. The same algebraic struc- tures on the cohomology of associative algebras were introduced by Gerstenhaber [1963]." I shall try to expand on these elements of a story, and survey some of the early developments in the theory of the various graded brackets that Mackenzie cited and used1.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of the Book & Author Publisher& Pages
    Title of the book & Author Publisher& Pages 1. Entropy and Information Theory Robert M. Gray | Springer, Published in 2008, 313 pages 2. Introduction to Information Retrieval Manning, Raghavan, Schütze | Cambridge University Press, Published in 2008, 496 pages 3. Partial Evaluation and Automatic Program Generation Neil D. Jones, Carsten K. Gomard, Peter Sestoft | Prentice Hall, Published in 1993, 400 pages 4. JPEG: Idea and Practice | Wikibooks, Published in 2011 5. Fundamentals of Cryptology: A Professional Reference and Interactive Tutorial Henk C. A. van Tilborg | Springer, Published in 1999, 503 pages 6. Tabu Search WassimJaziri | InTech, Published in 2008, 278 pages 7. Formal Syntax and Semantics of Programming Languages Kenneth Slonneger, Barry L. Kurtz | Addison Wesley Longman, Published in 1994, 637 pages 8. How to Write Parallel Programs: A First Course Nicholas Carriero, David Gelernter | MIT Press, Published in 1992, 246 pages 9. Natural Language Processing with Python Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, Edward Loper | O'Reilly Media, Published in 2009, 512 pages 10. Modern Computer Arithmetic Richard P. Brent, Paul Zimmermann | LORIA, Published in 2009, 239 pages 11. Introduction to Computer Science using Java Bradley Kjell | Central Connecticut State University, Published in 2006 12. Acceptance Test Engineering Guide GrigoriMelnik, Gerard Meszaros, Jon Bach | Microsoft, Published in 2009, 251 pages 13. Object Detection in Real Images Dilip K. Prasad | arXiv, Published in 2013, 123 pages 14. Information Theory and Coding John Daugman | University of Cambridge, Published in 2009, 75 pages 15. Rethinking Public Key Infrastructures and Digital Certificates Stefan A. Brands | The MIT Press, Published in 2000, 356 pages 16. Current Advancements in Stereo Vision 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Geography: Varieties of Structure Constants
    Pacific Journal of Mathematics ALGEBRAIC GEOGRAPHY: VARIETIES OF STRUCTURE CONSTANTS FRANCIS JAMES FLANIGAN Vol. 27, No. 1 January 1968 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 27, No. 1, 1968 ALGEBRAIC GEOGRAPHY: VARIETIES OF STRUCTURE CONSTANTS F. J. FLANIGAN Let ^ = cέ?{n, Ω) denote the algebraic set of structure constants for ^-dimensional associative algebras, a subset of Ωn*. Here Ω is a universal domain over a prime field F and a point c = (CMJ) with h, i, j = 1, , n is in ^ if and only if the multiplication (xh, Xi) -> XhX% = 2^ ChijXj is associative. The set ^ is readily seen to be F-closed in the Zariski topology on ΩnZ and is in fact a finite union of irreducible closed cones (the components of ^) with the origin as vertex. The natural "change of basis" action of the group G = GL(n, Ω) on ^ yields a one-one correspondence between orbits G-c on & and ^-dimensional ί2-algebras. One studies the globality of these algebras (and of algebras defined over subfields of Ω) by examining the geography of ^. Thus if S is a semi-simple ί2-algebra (more generally, if the Hochschild group H2(S, S) = (0)) then its corresponding orbit (denoted G-S) is open and therefore dense in its com- ponent ^o of ^. Thus S determines all algebras which live 2 on if 0. One checks that dim ^0 = n — n + s, where S = Si 0 θ & for simple Sa. Moreover, in the language of Gerstenhaber and Nijenhuis-Richardson, one may hope to de- form the algebras on ^Ό into S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohomology and Deformations in Graded Lie Algebras1
    COHOMOLOGY AND DEFORMATIONS IN GRADED LIE ALGEBRAS1 ALBERT NIJENHUIS AND R. W. RICHARDSON, JR. Introduction. In an address to the Society in 1962, one of the authors gave an outline of the similarities between the deformations of complex-analytic structures on compact manifolds on one hand, and the deformations of associative algebras on the other. The first theory had been stimulated in 1957 by a paper [7] by Nijenhuis- Frölicher and extensively developed in a series of papers by Kodaira- Spencer, Kodaira-Spencer-Nirenberg and Kuranishi; the second had just been initiated by Gerstenhaber [9]. While fine details were not available at that time, it seemed that graded Lie algebras were the common core of both theories. In particular, in both cases, the set of deformed structures is represented by the set of solutions of a certain deformation equation in graded Lie algebras. This observation was further elaborated in a Research Announcement [16] of the authors, in which the concept of algebraic graded Lie algebra was carefully defined, and in which applications to deformations of Lie algebras and to representations, extensions and homomorphisms of algebras were indicated. The present paper gives a detailed discussion of the deformation equation in graded Lie algebras whose summands are finite-dimen­ sional. The paper starts with a general discussion of graded Lie algebras including the case of characteristic 2, and leads to a general deformation theorem, which is the precise analogue of Kuranishi's local completeness theorem for complex analytic structures [13]. (A more recent proof of this theorem [14] uses methods closely related to those indicated in [16].) The basic deformation theorems presented are 16.2, 18.1, 20.3, 22.1 and 23.4.
    [Show full text]