DOCSLIB.ORG

EXCAVATIONS at the LITTLE JOHN SITE (Kdvo-6)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EXCAVATIONS at the LITTLE JOHN SITE (Kdvo-6) EXCAVATIONS AT THE LITTLE JOHN SITE (KdVo-6) A Summary Report Submitted To The White River First Nation Yukon Government - Heritage Branch Government of Canada - Archaeological Survey of Canada (Permit #'s 03-5ASR, 04-10ASR, 06) Northern Research Institute - Yukon College Norman Alexander Easton Principal Investigator Lecturer in Anthropology and Northern Studies Yukon College, Whitehorse With Contributions By Glen MacKay, Prince of Wales Heritage Centre, Yellowknife Vance Hutchinson, Tulane University Christopher Baker Revised June 2007 Easton - Excavations at the Little John Site (KdVo-6) Page 2 of 142 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Little John site was first identified to me by the late Mrs. Bessie John and her brother Mr. Joseph Tommy Johnny, children of Little John. Financial and logistical support for the excavations at the Little John site and subsequent analysis has been received from the White River First Nation of Beaver Creek, Yukon, the Arts and Science Division and The Northern Research Institute of Yukon College, the Tanana Chief’s Conference, Fairbanks, AK, the Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge, US Department of the Interior, and the Heritage Resources Board of Yukon. Peter Schnurr, Ken Hermanson, Duncan Armitage, Arthur McMaster, Patricia Young, Camille Sanford, Eldred Johnny, and Derrick Peters (the latter two both grandsons of Little John) have all provided extensive volunteer field assistance over the years of excavation. Grant Lowey, Charlie Roots, Tammy Allen, and Steve Isreal of the Yukon Geological Survey, Yukon Territorial Government, Whitehorse, identified the lithology of the artifacts. Excavations in 2003 were supported by the Yukon College Field School in Subarctic Archaeology and Ethnography, while those in 2005 by the Community Development Fund of the Yukon Government and youth workers of the White River First Nation. Roy Carlson, James Dixon, Robert Satler, and Greg Hare have all provided informed discussion to our understanding of the site, for which we are grateful. The artifact drawings are by Reta Postoloski and Kawina Robichaud, with assistance from Celeste Whalen. Cover Photo Trail Survey Crew, 2007. Left to Right: Patrick Johnny, Glen Stephens, Kaz Kuba, Carol Burns, Victor Sam, Derrick Peters, Camille Sanford, Patricia Young, Paul Nadasdy. Easton - Excavations at the Little John Site (KdVo-6) Page 3 of 142 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 8 LOCATION ..................................................................................................................11 HISTORY AND METHODS OF INVESTIGATION....................................................13 GLACIAL HISTORY ...................................................................................................20 PALAEOECOLOGY ....................................................................................................21 CONTEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGY.................................................24 CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY.........................................................................................27 REGIONAL ARCHAELOGICAL SEQUENCES..........................................................31 The Northwestern Canadian (Central Southwest Yukon) Archaeological Sequence ...32 Northern Cordilleran Tradition...............................................................................33 Little Arm Phase or Northwest Microblade Tradition.............................................33 Annie Lake Complex .............................................................................................35 Taye Lake Phase or Northern Archaic Tradition or Middle Prehistoric Period........36 Aishihik Phase - Late Prehistoric Period ................................................................37 Bennett Lake Phase - Late Prehistoric....................................................................38 Discussion of Southwest Yukon Sequence .............................................................39 The Archaeological Sequence of Eastern Beringia (Central Alaska and Northwest Yukon) ......................................................................................................................41 Nenana Complex or Chindadn Complex ................................................................42 Denali Complex (American Palaeoarctic Tradition / Beringian Tradition)..............43 Northern Archaic Tradition....................................................................................46 Late Denali Complex .............................................................................................46 Athapaskan Tradition.............................................................................................46 Euroamerican Tradition .........................................................................................46 Comparative Discussion of the Interior Southeastern Beringian Archaeological Sequence ...................................................................................................................46 Archaeological Sites within the Borderlands Region..................................................48 SITE STRATIGRAPHY................................................................................................51 West Lobe Sediments ................................................................................................56 East Lobe Sediments..................................................................................................58 Comparative Geomorphology of the Little John Sediments........................................61 IDENTIFIED ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPONENTS .................................................66 FAUNAL REMAINS ....................................................................................................68 RADIO-CARBON DATES ...........................................................................................76 SUMMARY OF RECOVERED ARTIFACTS ..............................................................79 Formed Artifacts by Type and Stratum ......................................................................79 Distribution of Artifact Raw Material ........................................................................82 Detailed Distribution of Artifacts in the East Lobe Paleosols .....................................85 SELECTED DESCRIPTIONS OF ARTIFACTS BY COMPONENT AND TYPE........87 Artifacts of the Nenana Complex Component ............................................................87 Chindadn Points of the Nenana Complex Component ............................................88 Pointed Bifaces of the Nenana Complex Assemblage.............................................91 Large Bifaces of the Nenana Complex Assemblage................................................93 Easton - Excavations at the Little John Site (KdVo-6) Page 4 of 142 Modified Flake Tools of the Nenana Component ...................................................95 Additional Formed Tools of the Nenana Component..............................................96 Artifacts of the Denali Complex Component Assemblage..........................................98 Bifaces of the Denali Complex Component............................................................98 Modified Flake Tools of the Denali Component, East Paleosols...........................102 Blade Technology of the Denali Complex, West Lobe .........................................103 Scraper / Burin Technology of the Denali Complex, West Lobe...........................104 Artifacts of the Northern Archaic Component..........................................................108 Bifaces from the Northern Archaic Component....................................................108 Scraper Forms from the Northern Archaic Component.........................................109 Blade Technology from the Northern Archaic Component...................................110 Additional Formed Tools of the Northern Archaic Component.............................113 Artifacts of the Late Prehistoric and Historic Periods ...............................................116 REGIONAL CONTEXT OF THE EARLY COMPONENTS AT LITTLE JOHN SITE ....................................................................................................................................119 Chindadn Biface Form.............................................................................................119 Bipoint Biface Form ................................................................................................122 Biface Fragments.....................................................................................................125 SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF THE EARLY COMPONENTS OF THE LITTLE JOHN SITE............................................................................................................................126 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................130 REFERENCES............................................................................................................132 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Upper Tanana Student Excavators, Little John Site, 2007................................. 9 Figure 2. Historic Distribution of Upper Tanana Dineh..................................................10 Figure 3. General Location of the Little John Site, Yukon Territory, Canada .................11 Figure 4. Aerial view of the Little John Site from the South...........................................12
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Nations & Transboundary Claimants
    How to Contact Yukon First Nations & Transboundary Claimants Carcross/Tagish First Nation Kaska Ta’an Kwäch’än Council Box 130 Liard First Nation 117 Industrial Road Carcross, YT Y0B 1B0 Box 328 Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2T8 Location: Turn off Klondike Hwy at Watson Lake, YT Y0A 1C0 Tel (867) 668-3613 south end of bridge Location: On Campbell Hwy, across Fax (867) 667-4295 Tel (867) 821-4251 from high school/Yukon College Tel (867) 821-8216 – Lands Admin. Tel (867) 536-5200 – Administration Teslin Tlingit Council Fax (867) 821-4802 Tel (867) 536-2912 – Land Claims Fax (867) 536-2109 Box 133 Teslin, YT Y0A 1B0 Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Ross River Dena Council Location: On southwest side of General Delivery Alaska Highway Box 5309 Ross River, YT Y0B 1S0 Tel (867) 390-2532 – Administration Haines Junction, YT Y0B 1L0 Location: Near Dena General Store Tel (867) 390-2005 – Lands Location: Turn off Alaska Hwy, Tel (867) 969-2278 – Administration Fax (867) 390-2204 across from FasGas, follow signs Tel (867) 969-2832 – Economic Tel (867) 634-2288 – Administration Development Fax (867) 969-2405 Tetlit Gwich’in Council Tel (867) 634-4211 – Ren. Res. Mgr. Fax (867) 634-2108 Box 30 Little Salmon/Carmacks Fort MacPherson, NWT X0E 0J0 In Whitehorse: First Nation Location: On Tetlit Gwichin Road #100 – 304 Jarvis Street Tel (867) 952-2330 Whitehorse, YT Y1A 2H2 Box 135 Fax (867) 952-2212 Tel (867) 668-3627 Carmacks, YT Y0B 1C0 Fax (867) 667-6202 Location: Turn west off Klondike Hwy at north end of bridge to admin bldg Tr’ondëk Hwëch'in Inuvialuit Regional Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement
    THE CARCROSS/TAGISH FIRST NATION FINAL AGREEMENT among THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, THE CARCROSS/TAGISH FIRST NATION and THE GOVERNMENT OF THE YUKON Published under the authority of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 2005 www.ainc-inac.gc.ca 1-800-567-9604 TTY only 1-866-553-0554 QS-5384-000-EE-A1 Catalogue: R2-427/1-2005E-PDF ISBN:0-662-42156-6 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada Cette publication peut aussi être obtenue en français sous le titre: Entente définitive de la Première nation des Carcross/Tagish The preceding Elders' Statement does not form part of the Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement. AGREEMENT made this 22nd day of October, 2005. AMONG: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (hereinafter referred to as "Canada"); AND The Carcross/Tagish First Nation as represented by the Khà Shâde Héni of the Carcross/Tagish First Nation (hereinafter referred to as the "Carcross/Tagish First Nation"); AND The Government of the Yukon as represented by the Government Leader of the Yukon on behalf of the Yukon (hereinafter referred to as the "Yukon"), being the parties to this Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "this Agreement"). WHEREAS: the Carcross/Tagish First Nation asserts aboriginal rights, titles and interests with respect to its Traditional Territory; the Carcross/Tagish First Nation wishes to retain, subject to this Agreement, the aboriginal rights, titles and
    [Show full text]
  • Extending the Late Holocene White River Ash Distribution, Northwestern Canada STEPHEN D
    ARCTIC VOL. 54, NO. 2 (JUNE 2001) P. 157– 161 Extending the Late Holocene White River Ash Distribution, Northwestern Canada STEPHEN D. ROBINSON1 (Received 30 May 2000; accepted in revised form 25 September 2000) ABSTRACT. Peatlands are a particularly good medium for trapping and preserving tephra, as their surfaces are wet and well vegetated. The extent of tephra-depositing events can often be greatly expanded through the observation of ash in peatlands. This paper uses the presence of the White River tephra layer (1200 B.P.) in peatlands to extend the known distribution of this late Holocene tephra into the Mackenzie Valley, northwestern Canada. The ash has been noted almost to the western shore of Great Slave Lake, over 1300 km from the source in southeastern Alaska. This new distribution covers approximately 540000 km2 with a tephra volume of 27 km3. The short time span and constrained timing of volcanic ash deposition, combined with unique physical and chemical parameters, make tephra layers ideal for use as chronostratigraphic markers. Key words: chronostratigraphy, Mackenzie Valley, peatlands, White River ash RÉSUMÉ. Les tourbières constituent un milieu particulièrement approprié au piégeage et à la conservation de téphra, en raison de l’humidité et de l’abondance de végétation qui règnent en surface. L’observation des cendres contenues dans les tourbières permet souvent d’élargir notablement les limites spatiales connues des épisodes de dépôts de téphra. Cet article recourt à la présence de la couche de téphra de la rivière White (1200 BP) dans les tourbières pour agrandir la distribution connue de ce téphra datant de l’Holocène supérieur dans la vallée du Mackenzie, située dans le Nord-Ouest canadien.
    [Show full text]
  • CHON-FM Whitehorse and Its Transmitters – Licence Renewal
    Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2015-278 PDF version Reference: 2015-153 Ottawa, 23 June 2015 Northern Native Broadcasting, Yukon Whitehorse, Yukon and various locations in British Columbia, Northwest Territories and Yukon Application 2014-0868-3, received 29 August 2014 CHON-FM Whitehorse and its transmitters – Licence renewal The Commission renews the broadcasting licence for the Type B Native radio station CHON-FM Whitehorse and its transmitters from 1 September 2015 to 31 August 2021. This shortened licence term will allow for an earlier review of the licensee’s compliance with the regulatory requirements. Introduction 1. Northern Native Broadcasting, Yukon filed an application to renew the broadcasting licence for the Type B Native radio station CHON-FM Whitehorse and its transmitters CHCK-FM Carmacks, CHHJ-FM Haines Junction, CHOL-FM Old Crow, CHON-FM-2 Takhini River Subdivision, CHON-FM-3 Johnson’s Crossing, CHPE-FM Pelly Crossing, CHTE-FM Teslin, VF2024 Klukshu, VF2027 Watson Lake, VF2028 Mayo, VF2035 Ross River, VF2038 Upper Liard, VF2039 Carcross, VF2049 Dawson City, VF2125 Takhini River Subdivision, VF2126 Keno City, VF2127 Stewart Crossing, VF2128 Tagish, VF2147 Destruction Bay, VF2148 Whitehorse (Mayo Road Subdivision), VF2311 Lower Post and VF2414 Faro, Yukon; VF2306 Atlin and VF2353 Good Hope Lake, British Columbia; VF2354 Aklavik, and VF2498 Tsiigehtchic (Arctic Red River), Northwest Territories, which expires on 31 August 2015. The Commission did not receive any interventions regarding this application. Non-compliance 2. Section 9(2) of the Radio Regulations, 1986 (the Regulations) requires licensees to file an annual return by 30 November of each year for the broadcast year ending the previous 31 August.
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geology Investigations in Wellesley Basin and Nisling Range, Southwest Yukon J.D
    Surficial geology investigations in Wellesley basin and Nisling Range, southwest Yukon J.D. Bond, P.S. Lipovsky and P. von Gaza Surficial geology investigations in Wellesley basin and Nisling Range, southwest Yukon Jeffrey D. Bond1 and Panya S. Lipovsky2 Yukon Geological Survey Peter von Gaza3 Geomatics Yukon Bond, J.D., Lipovsky, P.S. and von Gaza, P., 2008. Surficial geology investigations in Wellesley basin and Nisling Range, southwest Yukon. In: Yukon Exploration and Geology 2007, D.S. Emond, L.R. Blackburn, R.P. Hill and L.H. Weston (eds.), Yukon Geological Survey, p. 125-138. ABSTRACT Results of surficial geology investigations in Wellesley basin and the Nisling Range can be summarized into four main highlights, which have implications for exploration, development and infrastructure in the region: 1) in contrast to previous glacial-limit mapping for the St. Elias Mountains lobe, no evidence for the late Pliocene/early Pleistocene pre-Reid glacial limits was found in the study area; 2) placer potential was identified along the Reid glacial limit where a significant drainage diversion occurred for Grayling Creek; 3) widespread permafrost was encountered in the study area including near-continuous veneers of sheet-wash; and 4) a monitoring program was initiated at a recently active landslide which has potential to develop into a catastrophic failure that could damage the White River bridge on the Alaska Highway. RÉSUMÉ Les résultats d’études géologiques des formations superficielles dans le bassin de Wellesley et la chaîne Nisling peuvent être résumés en quatre principaux faits saillants qui ont des répercussions pour l’exploration, la mise en valeur et l’infrastructure de la région.
    [Show full text]
  • Resedimentation of the Late Holocene White River Tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska
    Resedimentation of the late Holocene White River tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska K.D. West1 and J.A. Donaldson2 Carleton University3 West, K.D. and Donaldson, J.A. 2002. Resedimentation of the late Holocene White River tephra, Yukon Territory and Alaska. In: Yukon Exploration and Geology 2002, D.S. Emond, L.H. Weston and L.L. Lewis (eds.), Exploration and Geological Services Division, Yukon Region, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, p. 239-247. ABSTRACT The Wrangell region of eastern Alaska represents a zone of extensive volcanism marked by intermittent pyroclastic activity during the late Holocene. The most recent and widely dispersed pyroclastic deposit in this area is the White River tephra, a distinct tephra-fall deposit covering 540 000 km2 in Alaska, Yukon, and the Northwest Territories. This deposit is the product of two Plinian eruptions from Mount Churchill, preserved in two distinct lobes, created ca. 1887 years B.P. (northern lobe) and 1147 years B.P. (eastern lobe). The tephra consists of distal primary air-fall deposits and proximal, locally resedimented volcaniclastic deposits. Distinctive layers such as the White River tephra provide important chronostratigraphic control and can be used to interpret the cultural and environmental impact of ancient large magnitude eruptions. The resedimentation of White River tephra has resulted in large-scale terraces, which fl ank the margins of Klutlan Glacier. Preliminary analysis of resedimented deposits demonstrates that the volcanic stratigraphy within individual terraces is complex and unique. RÉSUMÉ Au cours de l’Holocène tardif, des matériaux pyroclastiques ont été projetés lors d’importantes et nombreuses éruptions volcaniques, dans la région de Wrangell de l’est de l’Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Y U K O N Electoral District Boundaries Commission
    Y U K O N ELECTORAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES COMMISSION INTERIM REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 Yukon Electoral District Commission de délimitation des Boundaries Commission circonscriptions électorales du Yukon November 17, 2017 Honourable Nils Clarke Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Yukon Legislative Assembly Whitehorse, Yukon Dear Mr. Speaker: We are pleased to submit the interim report of the Electoral District Boundaries Commission. The report sets out the proposals for the boundaries, number, and names of electoral districts in Yukon, and includes our reasons for the proposals. Proposals are based on all considerations prescribed by the Elections Act (the Act). Our interim report is submitted in accordance with section 415 of the Act for tabling in the Legislative Assembly. Our final report will be submitted by April 20, 2018 in accordance with section 417 of the Act. The final report will consider input received at upcoming public hearings and additional written submissions received by the Electoral District Boundaries Commission. Sincerely, The Honourable Mr. Justice R.S. Veale Commission Chair Darren Parsons Jonas Smith Anne Tayler Lori McKee Member Member Member Member/ Chief Electoral Officer Box ● C.P. 2703 (A-9) Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 Phone● téléphone (867) 456-6730 ● 1-855-967-8588 toll free/sans frais Fax ● Télécopier (867) 393-6977 e-mail ● courriel [email protected] website ● site web www.yukonboundaries.ca www.facebook.com/yukonboundaries @yukonboundaries Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Permafrost Thaw on Soil Hydrologic9 Thermal, and Carbon
    Ecosystems (2012) 15: 213-229 DO!: 10.1007/sl0021-0!l-9504-0 !ECOSYSTEMS\ © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) The Effects of Permafrost Thaw on Soil Hydrologic9 Thermal, and Carbon Dynan1ics in an Alaskan Peatland Jonathan A. O'Donnell,1 * M. Torre Jorgenson, 2 Jennifer W. Harden, 3 A. David McGuire,4 Mikhail Z. Kanevskiy, 5 and Kimberly P. Wickland1 1 U.S. Geological Survey, 3215 Marine St., Suite E-127, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA; 2 Alaska Ecoscience, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA; 3 U.S. Geological Survey, 325 Middlefield Rd, MS 962, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA; 4 U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA; 5/nstitute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA ABSTRACT Recent warming at high-latitudes has accelerated tion of thawed forest peat reduced deep OC stocks by permafrost thaw in northern peatlands, and thaw can nearly half during the first 100 years following thaw. have profound effects on local hydrology and eco­ Using a simple mass-balance model, we show that system carbon balance. To assess the impact of per­ accumulation rates at the bog surface were not suf­ mafrost thaw on soil organic carbon (OC) dynamics, ficient to balance deep OC losses, resulting in a net loss we measured soil hydrologic and thermal dynamics of OC from the entire peat column. An uncertainty and soil OC stocks across a collapse-scar bog chrono­ analysis also revealed that the magnitude and timing sequence in interior Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • East Siberian Arctic Inland Waters Emit Mostly Contemporary Carbon ✉ Joshua F
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15511-6 OPEN East Siberian Arctic inland waters emit mostly contemporary carbon ✉ Joshua F. Dean 1,2 , Ove H. Meisel1, Melanie Martyn Rosco1, Luca Belelli Marchesini 3,4, Mark H. Garnett 5, Henk Lenderink1, Richard van Logtestijn 6, Alberto V. Borges7, Steven Bouillon 8, Thibault Lambert7, Thomas Röckmann 9, Trofim Maximov10,11, Roman Petrov 10,11, Sergei Karsanaev10,11, Rien Aerts6, Jacobus van Huissteden1, Jorien E. Vonk1 & A. Johannes Dolman 1 1234567890():,; Inland waters (rivers, lakes and ponds) are important conduits for the emission of terrestrial carbon in Arctic permafrost landscapes. These emissions are driven by turnover of con- temporary terrestrial carbon and additional pre-aged (Holocene and late-Pleistocene) carbon released from thawing permafrost soils, but the magnitude of these source contributions to total inland water carbon fluxes remains unknown. Here we present unique simultaneous radiocarbon age measurements of inland water CO2,CH4 and dissolved and particulate organic carbon in northeast Siberia during summer. We show that >80% of total inland water carbon was contemporary in age, but pre-aged carbon contributed >50% at sites strongly affected by permafrost thaw. CO2 and CH4 were younger than dissolved and particulate organic carbon, suggesting emissions were primarily fuelled by contemporary carbon decomposition. Our findings reveal that inland water carbon emissions from permafrost landscapes may be more sensitive to changes in contemporary carbon turnover than the release of pre-aged carbon from thawing permafrost. 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Final Agreement Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Final Agreement
    CHAMPAGNE AND AISHIHIK FIRST NATIONS FINAL AGREEMENT CHAMPAGNE AND AISHIHIK FIRST NATIONS FINAL AGREEMENT between THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, THE CHAMPAGNE AND AISHIHIK FIRST NATIONS and THE GOVERNMENT OF THE YUKON This Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Final Agreement has been initialled by the negotiators for the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations, the Government of Canada and the Government of the Yukon, signifying their intent to recommend the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Final Agreement for ratification in accordance with Chapter 2 - General Provisions. Dated June 19, 1992. _____________________________ Dave Joe Negotiator Champagne and Aishihik First Nations _____________________________ Mike Whittington Negotiator Government of Canada _____________________________ Shakir Alwarid Negotiator Government of the Yukon AGREEMENT made this _______ day of _______________________, 1993. AMONG: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Prime Minister (hereinafter referred to as "Canada"); AND The Government of the Yukon as represented by the Government Leader of the Yukon on behalf of the Yukon (hereinafter referred to as "the Yukon"); AND The Champagne and Aishihik First Nations as represented by the Chief of the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations (hereinafter referred to as the "Champagne and Aishihik First Nations") being the parties to this Champagne and Aishihik First Nations Final Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "this Agreement"). WHEREAS: The Champagne and Aishihik First Nations asserts aboriginal
    [Show full text]
  • Pits 99Front Pages
    GranularGranular ResourcesResources DirectoryDirectory YukonYukon Indian Affairs and Northern Development Canada 1999 Granular Resources Directory Yukon Indian Affairs and Northern Development Canada 1999 Prepared by Inukshuk Planning & Development In association with K-L Services, Whitehorse © 1999, Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Canada Recommended citation: Inukshuk Planning and Development, 1999. Granular Resources Directory: Yukon. Prepared for the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa, Canada, by Inukshuk Planning and Development, Whitehorse, Yukon, in association with K-L Services, Whitehorse, Yukon. March, 1999. 30 pages. Additional copies of this directory may be obtained from: Land Use Section, Land Resources Northern Affairs Program - Yukon Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Room 320 – 300 Main Street Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2B5 For further information on this directory and other northern granular resources studies, contact: Manager, Land Programs Northern Affairs Program Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Room 618, North Tower Les Terrasses de la Chaudiere Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H4 PREFACE The roles and responsibilities of governments and institutions in the North are evolving rapidly as a result of land claims and self-government agreements, devolution to the territorial governments and the creation of a new territory, Nunavut. New institutions of public government with responsibilities for land use planning and resources management are being created pursuant to land claim settlements. Resource management boards have, or will assume from DIAND, many of its historical regulatory responsibilities. However, in the interim, DIAND is still responsible for managing federal lands in a way that complements the activities of the new institutions and governments. This includes, as a specific component of DIAND’s sustainable development strategy, continuing to develop a program for the effective management of granular resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Conceptual Modeling to Advance an Integrated Watershed Management Approach in the Aishihik Drainage Basin
    Running Head: AISHIHIK DRAINAGE BASIN CONCEPTUAL MODELING USING CONCEPTUAL MODELING TO ADVANCE AN INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT APPROACH IN THE AISHIHIK DRAINAGE BASIN By NADIA F. JOE B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 2004 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in ENVIRONMENT AND MANAGEMENT We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard ------------------------------- Dr. Glenn Brown, Thesis Supervisor Royal Roads University ------------------------------ Thesis Coordinator School of Environment and Sustainability ------------------------------ Director School of Environment and Sustainability ROYAL ROADS UNIVERSITY September 2014 © Nadia Joe, 2014 AISHIHIK DRAINAGE BASIN CONCEPTUAL MODELING 2 Abstract Changing conditions, increased, and at times competing, demands on water resources, and relatively new requirements for shared and sustainable management of water resources indicate the need for an updated water management approach in the Aishihik Drainage Basin. Ideas from Integrated Watershed Management appear to be well suited to the regional context but additional tools are needed to synthesize data from two distinct systems: western scientific methods and traditional knowledge. This study showed the tools and techniques of conceptual modeling advance integrated watershed management in a manner that considers local values and is consistent with newer legal requirements in the southwest Yukon. Conceptual modeling techniques helped to identify critical links
    [Show full text]