The Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tranexamic Acid
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Transfusion Medicine Reviews xxx (2018) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Transfusion Medicine Reviews journal homepage: www.tmreviews.com The efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis Joshua Montroy a,b, Brian Hutton a,b, Preveshen Moodley c, Nicholas A. Fergusson a, Wei Cheng a, Alan Tinmouth a, Luke T. Lavallée a,c, Dean A. Fergusson a,b,c, Rodney H. Breau a,c,⁎ a Clinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada b University of Ottawa, School of Epidemiology, Community Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada c Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada article info abstract Available online xxxx Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an effective hemostatic agent used for the reduction of blood loss and transfusion. How- ever, the safety profile of TXA remains in question due to a potential increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Keywords: By applying TXA topically as opposed to intravenously, systemic absorption may be reduced and unwanted side- Tranexamic acid effects mitigated. The objective of our review is to investigate the efficacy and safety of topically applied Lysine analogue tranexamic acid compared to both placebo, and the intravenous administration. Cochrane Central Register of Surgery Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched from in- Blood transfusion ception to November, 2016. We included randomized controlled trials that compared topical tranexamic acid Venous thromboembolism Topical to either placebo (or standard care) or intravenous administration, in adult patients. Surgical and non-surgical trials were included. Abstract, full-text selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were all performed in duplicate. In total, 67 studies involving 6,034 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of trials evaluated orthopedic procedures. Compared to placebo, the administration of topical TXA significantly reduced the odds of receiving a blood transfusion (pooled OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.38; P b 0.001) and significantly reduced mean blood loss (WMD -276.6, 95% CI -327.8 to -225.4; P b 0.0001). When compared to the intravenous administra- tion, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of transfusion requirements (pooled OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.46; P=0.88) or blood loss (WMD -21.95, 95% CI -66.61 to 27.71; P=0.34). There was no difference in the odds of developing a venous thromboembolic complication between the topical TXA and control groups (pooled OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.29; P=0.33) or the topical and intravenous groups (pooled OR=0.75, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.46; P=0.40). The topical application of TXA effectively reduces both transfusion risk and blood loss compared to pla- cebo, without increasing thromboembolic risks. There were no major differences between topical and intravenous tranexamic acid with respect to safety and efficacy, and both were superior to placebo with regards to blood loss and transfusion requirements. Further study of the topical application is required outside of the field of orthopedics. © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Contents Background&Rationale............................................................ 0 Methods................................................................... 0 . EligibilityCriteria......................................................... 0 . LiteratureSearchStrategy...................................................... 0 . StudySelectionProcess....................................................... 0 . DataExtractionandRiskofBiasAssessment............................................. 0 . DataAnalysis........................................................... 0 Results................................................................... 0 . CharacteristicsofIncludedStudies.................................................. 0 . StudyQualityandRiskofBias.................................................... 0 ⁎ Corresponding author at: Rodney H. Breau, MsC, MD, FRCSC, Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Associate Scientist, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital/Uni- versity of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Rd, Box 222, Ottawa, ON K1H8L6, Canada. E-mail address: [email protected] (R.H. Breau). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2018.02.003 0887-7963/© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Please cite this article as: Montroy J, et al, The efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Transfus Med Rev (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2018.02.003 2 J. Montroy et al. / Transfusion Medicine Reviews xxx (2018) xxx–xxx . EffectoftopicalTXAontransfusionrate................................................ 0 . Comparedtoplacebo.................................................... 0 . Comparedtointravenousadministration........................................... 0 . EffectoftopicalTXAdoseontransfusionrate............................................. 0 . EffectoftopicalTXAonbloodloss.................................................. 0 . Comparedtoplacebo.................................................... 0 . Comparedtointravenousadministration........................................... 0 . EffectoftopicalTXAontherateofvenousthromboembolicevents................................... 0 . Comparedtoplacebo.................................................... 0 . Comparedtointravenousadministration........................................... 0 . EffectoftopicalTXAontheriskofdeath............................................... 0 . EffectoftopicalTXAontheriskofstroke............................................... 0 . EffectoftopicalTXAontheriskofmyocardialinfarction........................................ 0 . PublicationBias........................................................... 0 Discussion.................................................................. 0 Conclusion.................................................................. 0 Funding................................................................... 0 ConflictofInterestStatement.......................................................... 0 AppendixA. Supplementarydata....................................................... 0 AppendixA. Supplementarydata....................................................... 0 References.................................................................. 0 Background & Rationale interventions, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topically administered tranexamic Allogenic blood transfusions, although potentially life-saving, acid. may be associated with an increased risk of infection and immune reactions, which may be a major source of morbidity for patients [1,2]. Methods A number of strategies are available that limit surgical blood loss and transfusions. Use of hemostatic agents has increased over the last Our review was registered on Prospero (no. CRD42016035902). A decade [3] with antifibrinolytics emerging as popular agents in review protocol was prepared according to the PRISMA-P checklist both medical and surgical practice. Antifibrinolytic lysine analogues [21] and is available upon request. The final report was prepared in ac- have been shown to be effective in reducing blood loss during surgery cordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and trauma as well as non-surgical diseases such as anemia related and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) [22]. to cancer [4-6]. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a lysine analogue and is a widely used antifibrinolytic. Systemic use of TXA has been shown in Eligibility Criteria meta-analyses to be safe and effective at reducing blood loss in cardiac [7], orthopedic [8], pelvic [5], and spinal surgeries [9], among others, We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared and is listed on the World Health Organization’s List of Essentials topical tranexamic acid to either placebo (or standard care) or intrave- Medicines. nously administered tranexamic acid in adult patients. Surgical and Due to the mechanism of action of lysine analogues, there exists a non-surgical trials were included. We did not restrict inclusion by theoretical increased risk of developing venous thromboembolic (VTE) drug dose or timing of administration. Our primary outcome was the complications such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary risk of blood transfusion defined as the number of patients requiring embolism (PE) [10]. In one of the largest trauma trials to date, the at least one unit of red blood cells transfused. Our secondary outcomes CRASH-2 trial (Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Signifi- included blood loss and adverse events (mortality, myocardial infarc- cant Hemorrhage), the efficacy and safety of TXA was assessed in over tion (MI), stroke, and venous thromboembolic events). We did not 20,000 adult trauma patients and no increase in thromboembolic events impose any language restrictions. was reported. However the precision of the safety estimate was low and therefore a potential for increased risk of VTE was not ruled out [6]. Literature Search Strategy Many systematic reviews have examined the relationship between ly- sine analogues and VTE risk, with point estimates remaining imprecise A comprehensive literature search of indexed databases was con- and thus unable to rule out a potential increased risk of VTE [5,11-13]. ducted to identify all relevant studies in