DOCSLIB.ORG

Threat Specific Contingency Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Threat Specific Contingency Plan INDUSTRY BIOSECURITY PLAN FOR THE PAPAYA INDUSTRY Threat Specific Contingency Plan Papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Plant Health Australia September 2011 Disclaimer The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts have been made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Further information For further information regarding this contingency plan, contact Plant Health Australia through the details below. Address: Suite 1, 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 Email: [email protected] Website: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au Plant Health Australia | Contingency Plan – Papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) 1 Purpose and background of this contingency plan ................................................................. 5 2 Australian papaya industry ......................................................................................................... 5 3 Pest information/status ............................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Pest details ............................................................................................................................ 6 3.1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Life cycle ......................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Affected hosts ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.1 Host range ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Current geographic distribution ..................................................................................... 10 3.2.3 Symptoms ..................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Diagnostic information ......................................................................................................... 13 3.4 Pest risk ratings and potential impacts ................................................................................ 14 3.4.1 Entry potential ............................................................................................................... 14 3.4.2 Establishment potential ................................................................................................. 15 3.4.3 Spread potential ............................................................................................................ 15 3.4.4 Economic impact ........................................................................................................... 15 3.4.5 Environmental impact .................................................................................................... 15 3.4.6 Overall risk .................................................................................................................... 15 4 Pest management ....................................................................................................................... 16 4.1 Response checklist .............................................................................................................. 16 4.2 Delimiting survey and epidemiology study .......................................................................... 17 4.2.1 Sampling method .......................................................................................................... 17 4.2.2 Epidemiological study ................................................................................................... 19 4.2.3 Models of spread potential ............................................................................................ 20 4.2.4 Pest Free Area guidelines ............................................................................................. 20 4.3 Availability of control methods ............................................................................................. 20 4.3.1 General procedures for control ..................................................................................... 20 4.3.2 Control if small areas are affected ................................................................................ 20 4.3.3 Control if large areas are affected ................................................................................. 21 4.3.4 Cultural control .............................................................................................................. 21 4.3.5 Host plant resistance ..................................................................................................... 21 4.3.6 Chemical control............................................................................................................ 21 4.3.7 Biological control ........................................................................................................... 21 5 Course of action- potential eradication methods ................................................................... 22 5.1 Destruction strategy ............................................................................................................. 22 | PAGE 3 Plant Health Australia | Contingency Plan – Papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) 5.1.1 Destruction protocols .................................................................................................... 22 5.1.2 Decontamination protocols ............................................................................................ 23 5.1.3 Priorities ........................................................................................................................ 23 5.1.4 Plants, by-products and waste processing ................................................................... 23 5.1.5 Disposal issues ............................................................................................................. 24 5.2 Quarantine and movement controls .................................................................................... 24 5.2.1 Quarantine priorities ...................................................................................................... 24 5.2.2 Movement control for people, plant material and machinery ........................................ 24 5.3 Zoning .................................................................................................................................. 25 5.3.1 Destruction Zone ........................................................................................................... 25 5.3.2 Quarantine Zone ........................................................................................................... 25 5.3.3 Buffer Zone .................................................................................................................... 26 5.3.4 Restricted Area .............................................................................................................. 26 5.3.5 Control Area .................................................................................................................. 26 5.4 Decontamination and farm clean up .................................................................................... 27 5.4.1 Decontamination procedures ........................................................................................ 27 5.4.2 General safety precautions ........................................................................................... 27 5.5 Surveillance and tracing ...................................................................................................... 27 5.5.1 Surveillance ................................................................................................................... 27 5.5.2 Survey regions .............................................................................................................. 29 5.5.3 Post-eradication surveillance ........................................................................................ 29 6 References .................................................................................................................................. 31 6.1 Websites .............................................................................................................................. 32 7 Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 33 7.1 Appendix 1: Standard diagnostic protocols ......................................................................... 33 7.2 Appendix 2: Resources
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Colonization of Australian Ladybird Beetle, Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri Mulsant in Papaya Plantation Infested with Paracoc
    Journal of Biological Control, 26 (4): 389–390, 2012 Research Note Natural colonization of Australian ladybird beetle, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant in papaya plantation infested with Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink in Tamil Nadu M. KALAYANASUNDARAM, M. MANI* and C. SHIVARAJU* Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003 Division of Entomology and Nematology, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore 560 089 Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The role of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri as an effective predator of Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink was often doubtful. Natural colonisation of C. montrouzieri was observed on papaya at Sathyamangalam (Tamil Nadu). The number of larvae were 18 to 30 per leaf. The massive colonisation of C. montrouzieri, will help in its effective utilisation against P. marginatus. KEY WORDS: Paracoccus marginatus, Cryptlolaemus montrouzieri (Article chronicle: Received: 16-08-2012; Revised: 24-11-2012; Accepted: 06-12-2012) The papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus field visits in Coimbatore district. During the visit in Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudo- July 2012, large number of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri coccidae), native of Mexico, was reported in Coimbatore Mulsant were found feeding on P. marginatus on papaya (Tamil Nadu) in July 2008. P. marginatus sucks the plantation located at Sathyamangalam. All stages of sap from the leaf resulting in leaf distortion. Fruits C. montrouzieri were found amongst the mealybug covered with mealybugs and sooty mould lose market colonies indicating colonization on papaya mealybug. value (Suresh et al., 2010; Tanwar et al., 2010). Chemicals Number of larvae ranged from 18 to 30 per papaya were used desperately when there was outbreak of leaf.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus Marginatus on Laboratory Hosts, Sprouted Potato and Long Bottle Gourd
    International Journal of Entomology Research International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 Received: 11-11-2019; Accepted: 12-12-2019 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 5; Issue 1; January 2020; Page No. 52-56 Biology of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus on laboratory hosts, sprouted potato and long bottle gourd Iqra1*, Seema Tahir2, Muhammad Samiullah Channa3, Tahir Anwar4 1, 2 Department of Zoology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan 3, 4 Pest Management Research Institute (PMRI), PARC-SARC, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan Abstract In this study, biological parameters of the papaya mealybug (PMB), Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink, on two hosts, sprouted potato (Solanum tuberosum) and long bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) vegetables, were investigated under semi-controlled laboratory conditions; to determine the host suitability for rearing of this insect that to be used for augmentation of its natural enemies and for experimental animal in scientific research. Papaya mealybugs have established and completed their lifecycle on both of the hosts; however, there were differences in the biological parameters. The total lifespan of Paracoccus marginatus on sprouted potato was 38.8±4.4 days for female and 25±2.3 days for male while on long bottle gourd, it was 30.8±5.8 days for female and 22.4±2.6 days for male, respectively. The observed nymphal period of the PMB female varies from 15 to 20 (17.8±2.28) days on sprouted potato and 13 to 17 days (15.0±2.0) on long bottle gourd. The nymphal period exhibited by the PMB male on sprouted potato and long bottle gourd was 22.2±2.0 and 20.8±2.3 days, correspondingly.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of the Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus Marginatus (Hemiptera
    First report of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in China and genetic record for its recent invasion in Asia and Africa Muhammad Z. Ahmed1,5, Ri-Rong He2, Mu-Tao Wu2, Yu-Juan Gu2, Jing-Mei Ren3, Fan Liang2, Hai-Lin Li4, Xue-Nan Hu2, Bao-Li Qiu3, Catharine M. Mannion1, and Jun Ma2,5,* Abstract The papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), is a polyphagous pest that damages many tropical crops. It is a native of Central America and spread to the Caribbean region and South America in the 1990s; since then it has accidentally been introduced to some islands in the Pacific region and some countries in Africa and Asia. We recorded its presence in China for the first time in 2013 from Guangdong Province and Yunnan Province in southern and southwestern China, respectively. Our genetic analysis revealed that only 1 haplotype of P. marginatus has been recorded in all of Asia, including China, reflecting the very recent invasion of P. marginatus in Asia. This study also includes a summary of the global geographical distribution of P. marginatus. Key Words: genetic identity; haplotype; global distribution; insect pest Resumen La cochinilla de la papaya, Paracoccus marginatus Williams y Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), es una plaga polífaga que daña muchos cultivos tropicales. Es originario de América Central y se extendió a la región del Caribe y América del Sur en la década de 1990; desde entonces ha sido introducida accidentalmente en algunas islas de la región del Pacífico y algunos países de África y Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Papaya Mealybug (328)
    Pacific Pests, Pathogens and Weeds - Online edition Papaya mealybug (328) Summary Worldwide distribution. On fruit trees, vegetables, root crops, ornamentals, weeds. An important papaya mealybug. Damage: (i) thick layers of mealybugs and white wax on fruit and leaves causing yellowing, stunting, fruit drop; (ii) sooty moulds grow on honeydew, covering leaves, and staining fruit. Eggs laid into egg sac underneath female; produce 'crawlers' (nymphs); these moult developing into females, up to 2.2 mm long, with yellow bodies, covered in white wax, fringed with waxy threads. Males, short-lived, fly-like insects with wings. Photo 1. Colonies of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus, along veins of papaya Spread by crawlers walking, or carried by wind, vehicles, animals, birds, on clothes, and the leaf. trade in plants. Natural enemies: ladybird beetles, wasp parasitoids (e.g., Acerophagus papayae). Cultural control: for ants: boiling water; prune low branches and remove weeds (to stop ants). Chemical control: use soap, horticultural or white oils (see Fact Sheet no. 56); avoid malathion and synthetic pyrethroids - they will kill natural enemies. Only use pyrethroids to kill ants. Common Name Photo 2. Crust of mealybugs and wax, papaya Papaya mealybug mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus, on papaya fruit. Scientific Name Paracoccus marginatus Photo 3. Masses of cotton wool-like wax over colony of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus. Photo 4. Adults and crawlers, papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus. Photo 5. Slide-mounted adult female, papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus. AUTHO R Grahame Jackson Information from W alker A et al. (2018) Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus W illiams and Granara de W illink (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of the African Apefly (Spalgis Lemolea)
    sustainability Article Bionomics of the African Apefly (Spalgis lemolea) as A Potential Natural Enemy of the Papaya Mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in Tanzania Sayuni P. Nasari 1,*, Anna C. Treydte 1, Patrick A. Ndakidemi 1 and Ernest R. Mbega 1 Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity and Ecosystems Management, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha P. O. Box 447, Tanzania * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 February 2020; Accepted: 2 April 2020; Published: 14 April 2020 Abstract: The African apefly (Spalgis lemolea Druce) is a potential natural enemy of the papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink). We studied the life history of apeflies in the laboratory at a temperature of 25–27 ◦C and a relative humidity of 55%–65% under a 12 h photoperiod condition. The papaya mealybugs and apefly larvae were collected from papaya plants in Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania. The papaya mealybugs were introduced and allowed to multiply on potted sprouting potato plants in screened cages. In order to study the life cycle and predation of apeflies, an apefly egg was placed on an open screen-covered petri dish containing a moist blotter paper and observed for larva emergence. After the apefly larva emergence, a mixture of mealybug eggs (up to 1500), nymphs (200–250) and adults (100–150) was introduced in the petri dish each day and the consumption rate by the apefly larvae was quantified until the larvae reached pupal stage. Then, the apefly adults were collected and put into cages 30 cm 30 cm 30 cm containing × × cotton wool soaked in water, for observation of pre-mating, mating, egg-laying and life span.
    [Show full text]
  • D:\JHPT Tropika\BC.JURNAL.DES08
    52J. HPT J.Tropika. HPT Tropika Vol. 19, No. 1, 2019:ISSN: 521411-7525–63 Vol. 19, No. 1, March 2019 E-ISSN: 2461-0399 Pages: 52–63 DOI : 10.23960/j.hptt.11952-63 ASPECTS OF BIOLOGY OF Acerophagus papayae Noyes & Schauff (HYMENOPTERA: ENCYRTIDAE), PARASITOID OF THE PAPAYA MEALYBUG Megawati1, Aunu Rauf2, & Pudjianto2 1 Entomology Study Program, Graduate School, Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia 2 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia Jln. Kamper Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Aspects of biology of Acerophagus papayae Noyes & Schauff (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), parasitoid of papaya mealybug. Acerophagus papayae Noyes & Schauff (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) is an important parasitoid of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams & Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). The study was conducted with the objective to determine various aspects of the biology of A. papayae which include the effect of diet on adult longevity, fecundity and progeny, host stage susceptibility and preference, the effect of host stages on immature development, body size, and sex ratio of progenies. Effects of diet on adult longevity was done in the absence of hosts. Fecundity was measured by the number of mealybugs parasitized. Host stage susceptibility and preference were carried out by exposing 2nd and 3rd nymphal instars and pre-reproductive adults of mealybugs to parasitoids. Results showed adult parasitoids fed with 10% honey solution lived almost fourfold longer than those provided only water. A. papayae parasitized 30.1±4.92 mealybugs, with a range of 13–60 mealybugs, during 5.8 days of adult life.
    [Show full text]
  • Paracoccus Marginatus, an Invasive Mealybug of Papaya and Its Biological Control – an Overview M
    Journal of Biological Control, 26 (3): 201–216, 2012 Review Article Paracoccus marginatus, an invasive mealybug of papaya and its biological control – An overview M. MANI, C. SHIVARAJU and A. N. SHYLESHA* Division of Entomology & Nematology Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessaraghatta, Bangalore 560 089, Karnataka, India *National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, Bangalore 560 024, Karnataka, India *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) is native of Mexico and /or Central and North America. Since its description in 1992, it has invaded several Carbbean Islands, Florida, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Taiwan, India, Bangladesh, West Africa, and it is likely to spread many other countries. It is highly polyphagus attacking more than 70 plant species causing severe loss. Insecticides failed to give adequate control of P. marginatus. On the other hand, natural enemies particularly, Acerophagus papayae Noyes and Schauff were highly useful to suppress the papaya mealybug. Its origin, distribution, taxonomy, biology, ecology, host range, natural enemies and methods of control particularly classical biological control are reviewed here. KEY WORDS: Paracoccus marginatus, invasive mealybug, Acerophagus papayae, biology, distribution, host range, natural enemies, taxonomy, classical biological control. (Article chronicle: Received: 30-05-2012 Revised: 16-06-2012 Accepted: 18-06-2012) INTRODUCTION Dominican Republic (CABI/EPPO, 2000) and Grenada in 1994, Antigua and Barbuda (CABI/EPPO, 2000), Saint Mealybugs throughout the world cause various Martin (Pollard, 1999) and The British Virgin Islands in economic problems. Paracoccus marginatus Williams 1996 (CABI/EPPO, 2000); USA (Florida) (Pollard,1999; and Granara de Willink, popularly known as papaya Miller and Miller, 2002; Walker et al., 2006), Haiti, mealybug (PMB) has invaded several countries and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus Marginatus (Williams and Granara De Willink) (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera) on Papaya
    Available online at www.ijpab.com Rasheed et al Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5 (2): 249-252 (2017) ISSN: 2320 – 7051 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2570 ISSN: 2320 – 7051 Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5 (2): 249-252 (2017) Research Article Biological Control of Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and Granara De Willink) (Pseudococcidae: Hemiptera) on Papaya V. Abdul Rasheed1*, T. Murali Krishna2, B. Bhaskar1 and K. Devaki2 1Department of Entomology, S.V. Agricultural College, Institute of Frontier Technology, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Tirupati, ANGRAU 2Department of Plant Pathology, S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, ANGRAU *Corresponding Author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 8.02.2017 | Revised: 20.02.2017 | Accepted: 21.02.2017 ABSTRACT Biological control of papaya mealybug by releasing parasitoid A. papayae at 100 numbers per hectare proved superior to unreleased field in causing reduction in mealybug population besides recording higher level of parasitoid activity. The mean initial mealybug population was 48.4 in parasitoid released field and 46.65 in unreleased field. The population of mealybugs at 15 and 30 Days After Release (DAR) was found to be 28.95 and 16.45 in parasitoid released field respectively. The pre-release mean population of parasitoid was 1.69 in released and 1.45 in unreleased field. At 30 DAR the population of parasitoid count was found to be 5.10 in released and 2.25 in unreleased field. Key words: Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus, Acerophagus papayae INTRODUCTION USDA and ARS researchers and Mexican coo Papaya mealybug is a polyphagous pest which perators as potential biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Ghana
    University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON AFRICAN REGIONAL POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMME IN INSECT SCIENCE (ARPPIS) HOST PLANT SUITABILITY OF THE PAPAYA MEALYBUG, PARACOCCUS MARGINATUS WILLIAMS AND GRANARA DE WILLINK (HEMIPTERA: PSEUDOCOCCIDAE), AND THE HOST SPECIFICITY OF ITS NATURAL ENEMY, ACEROPHAGUS PAPAYAE NOYES (HYMENOPTERA: ENCYRTIDAE) INTRODUCED INTO AFRICA. BY MICHELINE VIGNON HINTENOU SID: 10435407 BSc. (HONS) CROP AND VEGETABLE PROTECTION (CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF WEST AFRICA, BENIN REPUBLIC) THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF M.PHIL IN AGRICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY DEGREE JOINT INTER-FACULTY INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR THE TRAINING OF ENTOMOLOGISTS IN WEST AFRICA COLLABORATING DEPARTMENTS: ANIMAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND CROP SCIENCE COLLEGE OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES JULY, 2015 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DECLARATION AND APPROVAL i University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DEDICATION This work is dedicated to the Almighty God for His blessings, to my beloved parents Adolphe H. P. HINTENOU and Georgette L. DOSSOUMOU for their everlasting love, constant sacrifices and unconditional supports, and to my lovely brothers and sisters, Thierry, Freeda, Ulrich and Dolgette HINTENOU for their love, encouragement, and support. ii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby wish to show my appreciation to Drs. Nteranya Sanginga and Manuelle Támo, for giving me the opportunity to pursue my education. I really appreciate the fastest way you kept the promise you made with regards to my graduate studies. Special thanks to Dr. Georg Goergen for the entire scientific endeavor you built in me.
    [Show full text]
  • Endomicrobial Community Profiles of Two Different Mealybugs: Paracoccus Marginatus and Ferrisia Virgata
    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020. 30(7): 1013–1017 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2001.01016 Endomicrobial Community Profiles of Two Different Mealybugs: Paracoccus marginatus and Ferrisia virgata Polpass Arul Jose1#, Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy1, Pandiyan Indira Gandhi2, Murugaiyan Senthilkumar3, Veeranan Janahiraman1, Karunandham Kumutha1, Aritra Roy Choudhury4, Sandipan Samaddar4‡, Rangasamy Anandham1*, and Tongmin Sa4* 1Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India 2Regional Research Station, Vridhachalam, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu, India 3Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India 4Department of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Pseudococcidae) harbor diverse microbial symbionts that play essential roles in host physiology, ecology, and evolution. In this study we aimed to reveal microbial communities associated with two different mealybugs, papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) and two-tailed mealybug (Ferrisia virgata) collected from the same host plant. Comparative analysis of microbial communities associated with these mealybugs revealed differences that appear to stem from phylogenetic associations and different nutritional Received: January 13, 2020 requirements. This first report on both bacterial and fungal communities associated with these
    [Show full text]
  • Kaushalya G. Amarasekare Assistant Professor of Entomology and IPM Coordinator
    K. G. Amarasekare Kaushalya G. Amarasekare Assistant Professor of Entomology and IPM Coordinator Office Address: Tennessee State University College of Agriculture, Human and Natural Sciences Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 202 P, Farrell Westbrook Complex 3500 John A. Merritt Blvd. Nashville, TN, 37209 Contact information Phone: 615 963 5001 Fax: 615 963 5706 Email: [email protected] RESEARCH INTERESTS: Integrated pest management (IPM) Biological control Pest and natural enemy monitoring Effects of newer, reduced risk insecticide on natural enemies Pesticide efficacy Biology and life history of pests and natural enemies Effects of temperature on development, reproduction and survival of pests and natural enemies EDUCATION: Ph.D. (Entomology) University of Florida, Gainesville, FL M.S. (Entomology) Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK B.S. (Honors) (Agriculture) University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Postdoctoral Researcher – Affiliate Faculty, Oregon State University 2015 – Sept 2015 Postdoctoral Research Associate, Oregon State University 2009 – 2014 Research Associate, University of Florida 2008 – 2009 HONORS AND AWARDS: Entomological Society of America - Student and Young Professional Participation Award 2011 Entomological Society of America - Student and Young Professional Participation Award 2010 Entomological Society of America - Student and Young Professional Participation Award 2009 L. Russell Norton Memorial Fellowship–Miami-Dade County Agri-Council, Inc. 2007 1
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Potential of Australian Lady Bird Beetle Cryptolaemus Montrouzieri Mulsant on Papaya Mealybug
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(6): 837-840 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Predatory potential of Australian lady bird beetle JEZS 2018; 6(6): 837-840 © 2018 JEZS Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant on papaya Received: 17-09-2018 Accepted: 19-10-2018 mealybug A Maneesha Department of Entomology, S.V. Agricultural College, A Maneesha, SR Koteswara Rao, T Murali Krishna and P Sudhakar Tirupati, ANGRAU, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Abstract Predatory potential of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri on different stages of papaya mealybug was studied. SR Koteswara Rao Department of Entomology, The mean predatory potential of I, II, III and IV instar grub on Ovisac, I, II and III instar nymphs of S.V. Agricultural College, mealybug was 1.40±0.12, 30.60±0.51, 20.53±0.98 and 13.46±1.15; 1.68±0.13, 43.52±0.41, 30.40±0.68 Tirupati, ANGRAU, Hyderabad, and 17.33±0.88; 1.90±0.14, 47.04±0.84, 31.56±0.51 and 20.45±0.84 and 1.91±0.15, 54.10±0.45, Telangana, India 38.20±0.58 and 26.32±1.13. Average consumption capacity of male and female on ovisac, I, II and III instar nymphs was 2.98±0.09, 57.81±0.24, 41.39±0.12 and 28.51±0.02 and 3.05±0.10, 58.19±0.26, T Murali Krishna 43.00±0.19 and 29.28±0.08, respectively. Institute of Frontier Technology, Regional Agricultural Research Keywords: Predatory potential, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, Papaya mealybug Station, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India Introduction P Sudhakar Papaya is infested by several insect pests of which mealybug cause major losses to the yield.
    [Show full text]