AGENDA Corporate and Community Development Committee Meeting
To be held on Tuesday 20 October 2020 at 4:00pm City of Rockingham Council Chambers
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 PAGE 2
Notice of Meeting
Dear Committee members The next Corporate and Community Development Committee Meeting of the City of Rockingham will be held on Tuesday 20 October 2020 in the Council Chambers, City of Rockingham Administration Centre, Civic Boulevard, Rockingham. The meeting will commence at 4:00pm.
MICHAEL PARKER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 15 October 2020
DISCLAIMER
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER BEFORE PROCEEDING:
Statements or decisions made at this meeting should not be relied or acted on by an applicant or any other person until they have received written notification from the City. Notice of all approvals, including planning and building approvals, will be given to applicants in writing. The City of Rockingham expressly disclaims liability for any loss or damages suffered by a person who relies or acts on statements or decisions made at a Council or Committee meeting before receiving written notification from the City.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 PAGE 3
City of Rockingham Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda 4:00pm Tuesday 20 October 2020 1. Declaration of Opening Acknowledgement of Country This meeting acknowledges the traditional owners and custodians of the land on which we meet today, the Nyoongar people, and pays respect to their elders both past and present. 2. Record of Attendance/Apologies/Approved Leave of Absence 2.1 Members Deputies Cr Joy Stewart Cr Hayley Edwards Cr Sally Davies Cr Hayley Edwards Cr Craig Buchanan Cr Mark Jones Cr Rae Cottam Cr Lorna Buchan Cr Leigh Liley Cr Deb Hamblin (Deputy Mayor) 2.2 Executive Mr Michael Parker Chief Executive Officer Mr John Pearson Director Corporate Services Mr Michael Holland Director Community Development Mr Peter Doherty Director Legal Services and General Counsel Mr Peter Varris Manager Governance and Councillor Support Mr Michael Yakas Manager Customer and Corporate Support Mr Allan Moles Manager Financial Services Mr Nuno Dionisio Manager Waste Services Mr Khushwant Kumar Financial Controller Ms Nollaig Baker A/Manager Strategy and Corporate Communications Mr Vince Ritorto Manager Human Resources Development Mr Nick Brown Manager Community and Leisure Facilities Mr Gary Rogers Manager Community Infrastructure Planning Ms Mary-Jane Rigby Manager Community Safety and Support Services Ms Jillian Obiri-Boateng Collaborative Manager, Community Capacity Bldg Ms Julia Dick Collaborative Manager, Community Capacity Bldg Ms Alison Oliver Manager Library and Information Services Mr Scott Jarvis Manager Economic Development and Tourism Mrs Jelette Edwards Governance Coordinator Mr Aiden Boyham City Media Officer Ms Sue Langley Governance Officer Mrs Diane Zanre PA to Director Community Development 2.3 Members of the Gallery: 2.4 Apologies: Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 PAGE 4
2.5 Approved Leave of Absence: 3. Responses to Previous Public Questions Taken on Notice
4. Public Question Time Members of the public are invited to present questions to the Chairperson about matters affecting the City of Rockingham and its residents. Questions should relate to the business of the Committee. This is the only opportunity in the meeting for the public to ask questions. 5. Confirmation of Minutes of the Previous Meeting Recommendation: That Committee CONFIRMS the Minutes of the Corporate and Community Development Committee meeting held on 15 September 2020, as a true and accurate record. 6. Matters Arising from the Previous Minutes
7. Announcement by the Presiding Person without Discussion The Chairperson to announce to all present that decisions made at Committees of Council are recommendations only and may be adopted in full, amended or deferred when presented for consideration at the next Council meeting. 8. Declarations of Members and Officers Interests 8.1 Item CD-026/20 Recommendations from the Community Grants Program Advisory Committee Meeting held on 17 September 2020 Councillor: Cr Leigh Liley Type of Interest: Impartiality Nature of Interest: Cr Liley is a financial seven day member of the Rockingham Golf Club Incorporated. Extent of Interest: Not Applicable
8.2 Item CD-026/20 Recommendations from the Community Grants Program Advisory Committee Meeting held on 17 September 2020 Councillor: Cr Barry Sammels Type of Interest: Impartiality Nature of Interest: Cr Sammels is a patron of Rotary Club of Rockingham Inc., Rockingham Golf Club Incorporated and Safety Bay Tennis Club Inc. Extent of Interest: Not Applicable 9. Petitions/Deputations/Presentations/Submissions
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 PAGE 5
10. Matters for which the Meeting may be Closed
Corporate Services 6 CS-024/20 Tender T19/20-40 – Supply and Install ICT Infrastructure Refresh and Trade-In Purchase of Existing Server and Storage Infrastructure (including backup, disaster recovery and failover). 6
In accordance with section 5.23(2)(f)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1995 – if there are any questions or debate on Confidential Item CS-024/20 – Tender T19/20-40 – Supply and Install ICT Infrastructure Refresh and Trade-In Purchase of Existing Server and Storage Infrastructure (including backup, disaster recovery and failover), then the Corporate and Community Development Committee will need to defer the matter for consideration at Agenda Item 18 - Matters Behind Closed Doors. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-024/20 PAGE 6
Corporate Services CONFIDENTIAL ITEM NOT FOR PUBLIC ACCESS Section 5.95(3) Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) This item may be discussed behind closed doors as per Section 5.23(2)(f)(ii) of the Act
Corporate Services Customer and Corporate Support Reference No & Subject: CS-024/20 Tender T19/20-40 – Supply and Install ICT Infrastructure Refresh and Trade-In Purchase of Existing Server and Storage Infrastructure (including backup, disaster recovery and failover) File No: T19/20-40 Proponent/s: Author: Mr Michael Yakas, Manager Customer and Corporate Support Other Contributors: Mr Bekz Rasulov, Coordinator IT Operations Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Previously before Council: Disclosure of Interest: Nature of Council’s Role in Executive this Matter:
Site: Lot Area: Attachments: Maps/Diagrams:
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Officer Recommendation
That Council ACCEPTS the tender submitted from Cirrus Networks Pty Ltd for Tender T19/20-40 – Supply and Install ICT Infrastructure of core hardware and software components which includes a monthly charge over 60 months for a dark fibre connection for $891,491.59 (excluding GST) as the preferred tenderer subject to successful minor negotiations pursuant to regulation 20, Part 4, Division 2 of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 PAGE 7
11. Bulletin Items Corporate and General Management Services Information Bulletin – October 2020 Community Development Information Bulletin – October 2020 12. Agenda Items Corporate Services 8 CS-025/20 Council Policy – Service Complaints 8 CS-026/20 Budget Review – September 2020 (Absolute Majority) 11 General Management Services 14 GM-022/20 Christmas and New Year Administration Centre Closure 2020-2021 14 GM-023/20 Minor Review of the City of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029) (Absolute Majority) 17 GM-024/20 Recommendations from the Governance Review Committee Meeting held on 30 September 2020 (Absolute Majority – Recommendations 1 and 2) 23 Community Development 43 CD-026/20 Recommendations from the Community Grants Program Advisory Committee Meeting held on 17 September 2020 43 CD-027/20 Lockers for people experiencing homelessness 50
13. Reports of Councillors
14. Addendum Agenda
15. Motions of which Previous Notice has been given Corporate Services 62 CS-027/20 Notice of Motion Cr Buchanan – Preparation of Alternate Business Plan 62
16. Notices of Motion for Consideration at the Following Meeting
17. Urgent Business Approved by the Person Presiding or by Decision of the Committee
18. Matters Behind Closed Doors
19. Date and Time of Next Meeting The next Corporate and Community Development Committee meeting will be held on Tuesday 17 November 2020 in the Council Chambers, Council Administration Building, Civic Boulevard, Rockingham. The meeting will commence at 4:00pm. 20. Closure
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-025/20 PAGE 8
12. Agenda Items
Corporate Services
Corporate Services Customer and Corporate Support Reference No & Subject: CS-025/20 Council Policy – Service Complaints File No: CUS/22-02 Proponent/s: Author: Mr Michael Yakas, Manager Customer and Corporate Support Other Contributors: Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Previously before Council: 23 March 2010 (CES36/3/10), 18 August 2020 (CS-021/20) Disclosure of Interest: Nature of Council’s Role in Executive this Matter:
Site: Lot Area: Attachments: Maps/Diagrams:
Purpose of Report
For Council to rescind Council Policy – Service Complaints, disband the Customer Service Review Committee, direct the Chief Executive Officer to implement an interim complaints handling process which aligns with the Ombudsman Western Australia guidelines for effective complaints handling and develop a Customer Service Framework to include complaints handling.
Background
Council Policy – Service Complaints was reviewed and presented to Council on 25 August 2020. On 15 August 2020 Regulation 9(1) of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 was amended removing the ability for the Council or Chief Executive Officer to allow a person who is a council member to undertake a task that contributes to the administration of the local government. To allow time to investigate how the amended regulation would affect the Council Policy – Service Complaints, Council at its meeting held on 25 August 2020 resolved the following: That Council REFERS item CS-021/20 Council Policy – Service Complaints back to Committee for further officer advice. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-025/20 PAGE 9
Council adopted its Council Policy – Service Complaints (the Policy) on 23 March 2010. At the time of adopting Council Policy – Service Complaints Councillors were able to participate in the administration of the service complaint process as it was authorised by Council policy.
Details
As determined by current policy, a service complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction with a standard of service, a process, a product, or the behaviour of an employee or contractor. Service complaints are coordinated by the Manager Customer and Corporate Support. Complaints are initially investigated by the Chief Executive Officer or the Director of the relevant team. If the complainant is not satisfied with the response they may ask for their complaint to be referred to the Customer Service Review Committee for recommendation to Council for resolution. The committee’s composition is three Councillors and the Chief Executive Officer. When a complaint is made against the General Management team, the Director Corporate Services replaces the Chief Executive Officer on the committee. The committee’s terms of reference is to implement the Service Complaints Policy.
Implications to Consider a. Consultation with the Community Nil b. Consultation with Government Agencies Nil c. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective(s) contained in the Strategic Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective governance – Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical and compliant environment. d. Policy Council Policy – Service Complaints is inconsistent with the changes to Regulation 9(1) of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 and could not be implemented without breaching that regulation. As such it needs to be revoked and the Service Complaints Committee disbanded. Should Council support the officer recommendation, a new customer service framework will be development, which will be a Council Policy pursuant to the Council Policy - Policy Framework. This will guide the customer service and complaints handling processes of the City. e. Financial Nil f. Legal and Statutory In accordance with Regulation 9(1) of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 a person who is a council member must not undertake a task that contributes to the administration of the local government. g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-025/20 PAGE 10
Comments
Complaints handling is an important way for the management of an organisation to be accountable to the public. It also provides valuable feedback on organisational performance and the conduct of employees. Having an effective complaint handling process is fundamental to the provision of a quality service. Council Policy – Service Complaints is inconsistent with the changes to Regulation 9(1) of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 and could not be implemented without breaching that regulation. This is because Regulation 9(1) prohibits Councillors from being involved in a task that contributes to the administration of the City and participation in the Customer Service Review Committee is considered to constitute such a task. Despite this it is vitally important the City to have an effective complaint handling process; it is fundamental to the provision of quality service. Therefore, the City will continue to have a formal complaints handling process which demonstrates its commitment to provision of quality complaint handling. The specific process is currently being developed, however the process of investigating a complaint and having it reviewed independently will remain. The City is aware that there is a disallowance motion in Parliament seeking to overturn the Minister for Local Government’s amendment to Regulation 9(1) of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007. Notwithstanding the above, the City’s service complaints process cannot continue in its current format, it is essential the City still has an effective complaints handling process which demonstrates its commitment to quality complaint handling. Moreover, the Ombudsman Western Australia states that an effective complaint handling system is one that provides confidence that complaints are dealt with effectively through the following three steps: • Enabling Complaints – arrangements for enabling people to make complaints are customer focused, visible, accessible and valued and supported by management • Responding to Complaints – complaints are responded to promptly and handled objectively, fairly and confidently. Remedies are provided where complaints are upheld and there is a system for review. • Accountability and Learning – there are clear accountabilities for complaint handling and complaints are used to stimulate organisational improvements. Therefore, it is proposed that the Chief Executive Officer will implement a new Customer Service Framework, which incorporates a complaints handling process adhering to the Ombudsman Western Australia’s complaints handling principles.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Officer Recommendation
That Council: 1. RESCINDS the Council Policy – Service Complaints. 2. DISBANDS the Customer Service Review Committee 3. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer to implement an interim complaints handling process which aligns with the Ombudsman Western Australia guidelines for effective complaints handling. 4. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer to develop a Council Policy - Customer Service Framework incorporating complaints handling for adoption by Council within 6 months.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-026/20 PAGE 11
Corporate Services Financial Services Reference No & Subject: CS-026/20 Budget Review – September 2020 (Absolute Majority) File No: FLM/17-05 Proponent/s: Author: Mr Khushwant Kumar, Financial Controller Other Contributors: Mr Allan Moles, Manager Financial Services Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Previously before Council: Disclosure of Interest: Nature of Council’s Role in Executive this Matter:
Site: Lot Area: Attachments: September 2020 Budget Review Maps/Diagrams:
Purpose of Report
To adopt the September 2020 Budget Review.
Background
The City undertakes three budget reviews during the year to monitor its financial performance against the annual budget, and to review projections to the end of the financial year. Any variations of the annual budget arising from the review process are presented for Council’s consideration and authorisation.
Details
The September 2020 Budget Review includes details of transactions during the July 2020 – September 2020 period, and adjustments required to the annual budget. The document includes the following information: 1. Summary of Budget Position. 2. Summary of Major Amendments. 3. Detailed Statement of Operating and Non-Operating Revenue and Expenditure by Department.
Implications to Consider a. Consultation with the Community Nil
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-026/20 PAGE 12 b. Consultation with Government Agencies Nil c. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective(s) contained in the Strategic Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective Governance – Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical compliant environment. d. Policy Nil e. Financial The overall effect of this budget review is a closing surplus of $265,420 however, this is subject to possible changes required to the opening surplus as a result of the annual audit which is in the process of being finalised. f. Legal and Statutory This budget review is performed as a matter of good governance and is not required by legislation. Section 6.8(1)(b) of the Local Government Act 1995 requires a local government not to incur expenditure from municipal funds until it has been approved in advance by absolute majority by Council. g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment: High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety: Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Comments
The attachment titled September 2020 Budget Review provides full details related to proposed changes to the 2020/2021 Annual Budget. The annual financial audit for the City is still in progress; therefore, any estimate related to opening balances is subject to potential variations. The following is a summary of major changes (greater than $250k net) requested in the September 2020 Budget Review: Opening Balance The opening balance is expected to be $43.8m subject to audit closure. It includes $30.5m for carried forward funds from the previous financial year due to works in progress which is an increase of $6.2m from the adopted budget. Also included in the opening balance is $3.4m restricted funds for unspent grants, $3.6m restricted funds for Bert England Lodge and $1.8m restricted funds for Municipal bonds. Operating Revenue Operating revenue has increased by $4.8m and includes the following major amendments: • Additional $2.5m for the current year allocation of the WA Recovery Plan grant for the Baldivis Indoor Recreation Centre. • Additional $1.0m for the current year allocation of the WA Recovery Plan grant for Aqua Jetty Stage 2. • Additional $885k State Black Spot funding including for two intersections on Read Street. • Additional $261k Roads to Recovery funding. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-026/20 PAGE 13
• Reduction of $542k in Metropolitan Regional Road Grants. Operating Expenditure Operating expenditure has increased by $1.2m and includes the following major amendments: • Additional $512k under Jetty Maintenance including $300k for dredging, $100k for sand renourishment to beaches and $100k for emergency works undertaken at Mersey Point. • Reduction of $266k for the Community Safety Grant CCTV Project as this was completed in last financial year. Funds have also been allocated to provide additional resources to assist in the delivery of the new and brought forward capital projects. Non-Operating Revenue Non-operating revenue has decreased by $6.2m and includes the following major amendments. • Reduction of $3.7m in transfers from reserve funds due to the increased opening surplus and additional grant funding. • Reduction of $2.5m in loan funds for Baldivis Indoor Recreation Centre due to increased grant funding. Non-Operating Expenditure Non-operating expenditure has increased by $1.7m and includes the following major amendment. • Additional $1.6m for current year expenditure on Aqua Jetty Stage 2. There is also the additional $6.2m for carried forward projects from the previous financial year. The other proposed amendments including expenditure offset by additional revenues, internal allocations and other minor changes are detailed in the September 2020 Budget Review document.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
Officer Recommendation
That Council ADOPTS the September 2020 Budget Review.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-022/20 PAGE 14
General Management Services
General Management Services Human Resource Development Reference No & Subject: GM-022/20 Christmas and New Year Administration Centre Closure 2020-2021 File No: CPM/3 Proponent/s: Author: Mr Vince Ritorto, Manager Human Resource Development Other Contributors: Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Previously before Council: Disclosure of Interest: Nature of Council’s Role in Executive this Matter:
Site: Lot Area: Attachments: Maps/Diagrams:
Purpose of Report
Council consideration of closing the City of Rockingham Administration Centre over the 2020-2021 Christmas/New Year period.
Background
The City of Rockingham normally closes the Administration Centre over the Christmas/New Year Period, a practice commenced over ten years ago. City staff access accrued rostered days off, annual leave or leave without pay for those days other than the public holidays specified in the relevant Enterprise Agreement. Past statistics show that there is a significant decline in customer demand during the period. The closure of local government administration offices during this period is commonplace in the metropolitan area.
Details
In considering the forthcoming 2020-2021 Christmas/New Year period it is proposed that the Administration Centre be closed from 4:30pm, Thursday 24 December 2020 to and including Friday 1 January 2021, reopening Monday 4 January 2021.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-022/20 PAGE 15
The closure period is shown in the following calendar:
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Dec 21 Dec 22 Dec 23 Dec 24 Dec 25 Dec 26 Dec 27 Open Open Open Open Christmas Day Boxing Day Public Holiday Dec 28 Dec 29 Dec 30 Dec 31 Jan 1 Jan 2 Jan 3 Closure Closure Closure Closure New Year’s Boxing Day Day Public Public Holiday Holiday Jan 4 Jan 5 Re-open Open
Arrangements will be made for out-services such as libraries and the Operations Centre to ensure that an appropriate level of service is maintained for the community.
Implications to Consider a. Consultation with the Community Advertisements will be placed in the local newspaper, Council website, notice boards and social media platforms advising the closure dates for City services. b. Consultation with Government Agencies Nil c. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective(s) contained in the Strategic Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective Governance – Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical compliant environment. d. Policy Nil e. Financial Employees will access leave entitlements for the additional days’ leave during the period. f. Legal and Statutory The relevant clauses of the Rockingham Enterprise Agreements will be followed. g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-022/20 PAGE 16
Comments
The period between Christmas and New Year is traditionally a quiet time with a reduced demand for over the counter customer service and with supporting advertising, the Administration Centre closure has minimal impact on service delivery to the community. Rangers, Smart Watch and other essential service providing teams will continue to work on a rostered basis and nominated staff will be available for emergency situations. Arrangements will be made with staff who are required to attend events to ensure the events are appropriately resourced and on-call arrangements are in place with specific staff across the organisation. Given the administrative nature of this item it is proposed future reports are included in the Bulletin.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Officer Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the closure of the Administration Centre for the period from 4:30pm, Thursday 24 December 2020 to and including Friday 1 January 2021, reopening Monday 4 January 2021.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-023/20 PAGE 17
General Management Services Strategy Marketing and Communications Reference No & Subject: GM-023/20 Minor Review of the City of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029) (Absolute Majority) File No: CPM/171 Proponent/s: Author: Ms Nollaig Baker, Acting Manager Strategy Marketing and Communications Other Contributors: Mr Michael Parker, Chief Executive Officer Ms Melissa Swaney, Acting Strategic Projects Coordinator, Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Previously before Council: Disclosure of Interest: Nature of Council’s Role in Executive this Matter:
Site: Lot Area: Attachments: 1. Schedule of comments received 2. Draft reviewed Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029) Maps/Diagrams:
Purpose of Report
To seek Council approval of the minor review of the City of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029).
Background
Under s5.56 (1) of the Local Government Act 1995 all local governments are required to produce a plan for the future and comply with the Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework. The City of Rockingham’s Strategic Development Framework Policy outlines the City’s process for integrated planning. The Department of Local Government and Communities states that a successful integrated planning and reporting process will deliver the following outcomes: • a Strategic Community Plan (SCP) that clearly links the community's aspirations with the Council's vision and long term strategy; • a Corporate Business Plan that integrates resourcing plans and specific Council plans with the Strategic Community Plan, and • a clearly stated vision for the future viability of the local government area. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-023/20 PAGE 18
The SCP is not a static document. A full review is required every four years, and a minor review every two years as outlined in the Integrated Planning and Reporting Advisory Standard (2016) provided by the Department of Local Government and Communities. Following the major review of the City of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2015-2020) Council adopted the current community vision, aspirations and objectives in September 2018, documented in the City of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019–2029). This major review involved extensive community engagement at numerous Planning for the Future Workshops. Subsequent stakeholder, community and Councillor engagement is continually undertaken in the development of the identified Strategic Community Plan Strategies and major plans which deliver the community’s aspirations. The identified initiatives and activities, are budgeted for through the City’s Team Plan process, the annual budget and the Corporate Business Plan. A minor review was conducted in July 2020 and was informed by key internal stakeholders, community consultation and Councillor engagement. It should not change the strategic intent of the current plan nor divert from the identified community aspirations. As the review did not result in any changes to the community’s aspirations and objectives there is no financial impact on the City’s budget and Corporate Business Plan.
Details
The minor review of the SCP commenced in July 2020. Following a consultation process the outcomes of the minor review were presented to Council at the September 2020 Councillor Engagement Session. Minor changes are being proposed to update relevant strategies, plans and demographic content with the overall intent of the Strategic Community Plan 2019- 2029 remaining the same. The City engaged internally with key stakeholders and with the community by widely advertising the minor review of the SCP externally: • on the City’s website (share your thoughts) for a four week period from 1 July to 29 July 2020 • via Rock Port (to the Strategic Community Planning interest group) • on social media on 2 July and 16 July • via public notice in the Sound Telegraph on 15 July • via email to the working group who helped develop the plan in 2018. Four external submissions were received from community members through Share Your Thoughts on the City’s website. The submissions received are as follows:
Submissions Officer Response I also note that there is no mention of These concerns are covered in existing aspirations, and environmental issues such as the resulting Strategic Community Plans. Aspiration 3 – proposed Waste 2 Energy Plant or Plan for Future Generations includes elements which Cape Peron or the preservation of the cover both environmental as waste management remaining and dunes. issues, including: • Responsive planning and control of land use: Plan and control the use of land to meet the needs of the growing population, with consideration of future generations. • Alternative energy applications: Embrace new technology and apply alternative energy solutions to City facilities and service. • Preservation and management of bushland and coastal reserves: Encourage the sustainable management and use of the City’s bushland and coastal reserves. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-023/20 PAGE 19
Submissions Officer Response A significant improvement to Golden The State Underground Power Program (SUPP) is Bay would be underground power. managed by Western Power – the cost of This would reduce the frequency of undergrounding is shared between the State power outages which is especially Government, Western Power, Local Government tough for the high number of elderly Authorities (LGAs) and property owners. At this stage residents. I note there is no mention of the City and Western Power do not have plans to this in the 10 year plan. extend the program in the City of Rockingham.
My first thought is don't do what As part of Aspiration 1 the City has developed a Tourist Mandurah have done and removed car Destination Strategy 2019-2024, which includes a total parking spaces. If you want Tourist 24 action items across five Key Strategic Elements they will come by car. My second including: thought would be the location of the 1. Destination marketing (targeting eco and adventure visitor centre. I'd like to see it on an tourism) entry road with Caravan Parking. Add 2. Visitor servicing (face-to-face and digital) to this encourage Caravan Parks to be 3. Coastal development and activation built. There are a LOT of Caravan eras and unless the road network is 4. Events activation (entertainment destination) Caravan friendly they will bypass. I'd 5. Mid-tier MICE attraction. also like to see the council realise Please click link to view there is more to the City than https://rockingham.wa.gov.au/forms-and- Rockingham itself. So have publications/your-city/our-vision/tourist-destination- Community events in various places. I strategy-2019-2024 remember going to Australia Day Fireworks at the Rockingham The City’s Public Parking Strategy seeks to strike the Foreshore and it was a total nightmare balance between providing enough parking at the trying to get home. Perhaps a traffic Rockingham Foreshore and making best use of the key management plan may help. public spaces. The Strategy recommends that there be no net reduction of public parking at the Foreshore and the monitoring parking usage so that if parking demand is not regularly satisfied, measure are put in place to address demand.
The City implements traffic management for all City major events. There doesn't appear to be a strategic Under Aspiration 3 – Plan for the Future the strategic objective for the management of storm objective states that the City encourages the water run-off (gross pollutants, plastic sustainable management and use of the City’s and nutrients). It doesn't get a mention bushland and coastal reserves. The Lake Richmond under the management of reserves or Environmental Management Plan addresses action to sustainable waste management. Lake minimise the nutrient loads such as developing Richmond is threatened by nutrient run strategies in association with the Water Corporation to off and most of the ornamental better manage stormwater discharged from the local drainage ponds are overloaded with drainage network. The primary focus is on the reduction nutrients. The Pond and surrounding of waterborne litter and silt discharging into the main beaches are suffering from nutrient drainage system and the receiving water body. In this load and plastic washed in from storm case Lake Richmond. The strategy acknowledges that water. What is the plan to address this the management of stormwater requires an integrated blight on our environment approach involving the whole community.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-023/20 PAGE 20
The following are the proposed changes to the City of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029)
Page Proposed Changes No. Page 5 Update to demographic data By the beginning of 2023 there will be around 162,000 146,000 people living here Page 13 Edit to Aspiration 3 – Infrastructure planning Plan and develop community, sport and recreation facilities sustainable and safe infrastructure which meets the current and future needs of the City’s growing population Page 14 Edits to the Community Plan Strategies as follows: Aspiration one – Actively Pursue Tourism and Economic Development • Tourist Destination Strategy (2019) (new) • Coastal Facilities Strategy(new) – move to Aspiration 3 • Rockingham Strategic Metropolitan Centre Public Parking Strategy (2017) (current) • City Centre Transport Strategy (2014) (current) • Economic Development Strategy (2020) (to be updated) • Rockingham Strategic Metropolitan Centre, Centre Plan - Activity Centre Plan (current) (duplicate – under Aspiration three – Plan for Future Generations) Page 14 Aspiration two - Grow and Nurture Community Connectedness and Wellbeing • Reconciliation Action Plan* • Children and Young People Strategy (2018) (current) • Disability Access and Inclusion Plan* Strategy (current) • Digital Media Communication Strategy* (to be updated) • Health and Wellbeing Strategy (2018)(current) • Cultural Development and The Arts Strategy (2018) (current) • Volunteering Strategy (2016)(current) • Seniors Strategy (2017) (current) • Community Support Services Strategy (2017)(current) • Community Safety Strategy* (to be updated) • Library and Information Services Strategy (2017) (current) Page 14 Aspiration three - Plan for Future Generations • Community Infrastructure Plan (2020) (updated annually) • Rockingham Beach Foreshore Master Plan (2015) (current) • Strategic Asset Management Plan* (to be updated) • Infrastructure Asset Management Plan (2019) (new) • Safety Bay/Shoalwater Foreshore Revitalisation Masterplan (2019)(new) • Centre Plan - Rockingham Strategic Metropolitan Centre (current) • Rockingham Strategic Metropolitan Centre – Activity Centre Plan (2017) • Heritage Strategy (2020) (new) • Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan (2019) (new) • Sustainability Strategy (2020) (new) • City of Rockingham Waste Strategy Plan (2014) (current) • Natural Area Conservation Strategy (2017) (current) • Bushfire Risk Mitigation Strategy (2017) (current) • Greening Plan (2017) (current) • Public Open Space Strategy* (new) • Environmental Planning Strategy* (new) • Rockingham Foreshore Management Plan (2016) (current) • Local Planning Strategy* (new) • Karnup District Structure Plan* (new) • Coastal Facilities Strategy* Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-023/20 PAGE 21
Page Proposed Changes No.
Page 14 Aspiration four – Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise • Development of the Renaissance Technopole (current) • Ten Year Integrated Financial Business Plan (updated bi-annually) * Strategy under development at the time of publication. (October 2020).
Page 15 Update Achieving the vision • Remove Happiness Index – the City’s Net Promoter Score is no longer available on Rock Port as it is included in the Customer Satisfaction Survey. • Add to customer satisfaction survey: The Customer Satisfaction Survey also measures the City’s Net Promoter Score each year.
Implications to Consider a. Consultation with the Community The City engaged the community by widely advertising the minor review of the SCP: • on the City of Rockingham’s website (share your thoughts) for a four week period from 1 July to 29 July 2020 • via Rock Port (to the Strategic Community Planning interest group) • on social media • via public notice in the Sound Telegraph • via email to the working group who helped develop the plan in 2018. b. Consultation with Government Agencies Nil c. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision and Aspirations for the future as outlined in the City of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029): Aspiration 2: Grow and Nurture Community Connectedness and Wellbeing Strategic Objective: Community Engagement - Facilitate comprehensive community engagement on issues facing the City, ensuring that residents can provide input into shaping the future Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective governance - Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical and compliant environment. d. Policy City of Rockingham Strategic Development Framework Policy (2010) defines the process for the City’s Integrated Planning Framework which includes the review process (major and minor) of the Strategic Community Plan. e. Financial Funding of $2000 to redevelop the Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029) following the minor review is allocated in the Strategy, Marketing and Communications Team budget.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-023/20 PAGE 22 f. Legal and Statutory Section 5.56(1) of the Local Government Act 1995 provides the statutory framework for Planning for the future for Local Governments. Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996; Regulation 19C 7 provides a Council is to consider a Strategic Community Plan, submitted to it and is to determine where or not to adopt the plan or modifications. Absolute Majority required. g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Comments
The outcomes of the minor review of the SCP resulted in very minor changes. While the Community were given an opportunity to Share their thoughts on the review, the submissions received did not warrant any significant changes. The City is implementing the community’s aspirations defined in the City of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029) through the ongoing development and implementation of Community Plan Strategies as prioritised by the community in 2018. The City’s Strategic Development Framework Policy ensures that these priorities are delivered through planned activities and resourcing requirements in the City’s Budget and Corporate Business Plan. A minor review is predominantly a desktop exercise which is informed by key internal stakeholders, community consultation and Councillor engagement. It should not change the strategic intent of the current plan nor divert from the identified community aspirations. The recently completed minor review has resulted in some minor changes but has had no impact on the City’s Budget and Corporate Business Plan.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
Officer Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the minor review of Rockingham Strategic Community Plan (2019-2029).
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 23
General Management Services Governance and Councillor Support Reference No & Subject: GM-024/20 Recommendations from the Governance Review Committee Meeting held on 30 September 2020 (Absolute Majority – Recommendations 1 and 2) File No: CPM/225 Author: Ms Jelette Edwards, Governance Coordinator Other Contributors: Mr Peter Varris, Manager Governance and Councillor Support Ms Erica King, Manager Health and Building Services Mr Michael Ross, Manager Statutory Planning Ms Jane Anderson, Coordinator Building and Development Compliance Mr Nuno Dionisio, Manager Waste Services Ms Kelly Levisohn, Project and Waste Education Officer Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Disclosure of Interest: Nature of Council’s Role in Legislative and Executive this Matter: Attachments: 1. Minutes of the Governance Review Committee Meeting held on 30 September 2020. 2. Proposed City of Rockingham Fencing Local Law 2020 3. Proposed City of Rockingham Waste Local Law 2020 Maps/Diagrams:
Purpose of Report
Advisory Recommendation 1 To propose that Council adopt the proposed Fencing Local Law 2020 for the purposes of public consultation. The purpose and effect of the local law is: Purpose: The purpose of this local law is to provide what constitutes a ‘sufficient fence’ for the purposes of the Dividing Fences Act 1961 and to state the materials to be used and safety measures to be undertaken in relation to some types of fencing. Effect: Fencing in the district will need to comply with the definition of a ‘sufficient fence’ as stipulated in the local law and its other provisions. Advisory Recommendation 2 To propose that Council adopt the proposed Waste Local Law 2020. The purpose and effect of the local law is: Purpose: The objective of this local law is to regulate the storage, collection and disposal of waste and refuse from premises and on waste facilities in the City. Effect: Unless otherwise authorised, the storage, collection and disposal of waste and refuse within the City must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the local law. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 24
Advisory Recommendation 3 To consider a change to the proposed meeting schedule around the October 2021 local government elections. Advisory Recommendation 4 To consider a minor amendments to the Council Policy – Strategic Development Framework. Advisory Recommendation 5 To consider a minor amendment to the Council Policy – Policy Framework to accommodate a practical approach to the review of organisational procedures. Advisory Recommendation 6 Reduce COVID-19 updates to Councillors to as required.
Recommendations to the Corporate and Community Development Committee
Advisory Committee Recommendation 1 of 6: Proposed Fencing Local Law 2020 (Absolute Majority)
That Council - 1. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer in accordance with sections 3.12(3)(a) and (3a) of the Local Government Act 1995, to give State wide and local public notice stating that: • It is proposed to make a Fencing Local Law, and a summary of its purpose and effect; • Copies of the proposed local law may be inspected at the City’s offices; • Submissions about the proposed local law may be made to the City within a period of not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given; 2. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer In accordance with s3.12(3)(b), as soon as the notice is given, to supply a copy to the Minister for Local Government and the Minister for Commerce; 3. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer In accordance with s3.12(3)(c) of the Act, to supply a copy of the proposed local law to any person requesting it; and 4. NOTES that that the results will be presented to Council for consideration of any submissions received.
Officer Recommendation if Different to Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
The Officer’s Reason for Varying the Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
Background The City is in the process of updating its local laws. In December 2016 Council received the outcomes of a review required under s3.16 of the Local Government Act 1995 which indicated that a number required amendment or repeal. A proposed Fencing Local Law 2019 was presented to a March 2019 Governance Review Committee Meeting. After the committee meeting the City was involved with matters that affected the proposed local law. The presentation of the local law was therefore delayed pending further legal clarification. The proposed Fencing Local Law 2020 takes into account that previous legal advice provided and current advice provided for more recent fencing matters that have occurred. The City has an existing Fencing Local Law which was published in the Government Gazette in 2001 and last amended in 2011.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 25
Most matters relating to fencing are dealt with by the Dividing Fences Act 1961, which in essence provides for property owners to build fences and maintain them by agreement. The main role for a local government is to prescribe what is considered to be a ‘sufficient fence’ in the event that owners cannot agree, and to regulate some matters. The extent of changes required to the City’s existing Fencing Local law are such that it is simpler and cheaper to make a new one, although in general the proposed new local law retains most of the salient features of the City’s current local law and Local Planning Scheme requirements. Enforcement provisions and legislative references have been updated wherever required. As noted above, most issues relating to dividing fences are dealt with by the Dividing Fences Act 1961. The Act provides for most issues relating to fencing between properties to be decided by agreement between owners. Amongst other things: • Owners are equally liable for the costs of erection and maintenance of a fence; • The Act provides for a process to decide what is to be built or repaired in the event that owners cannot agree; • A fence does not have to be built precisely on a boundary for it to be a dividing fence; and • A local government may prescribe by a local law what constitutes a ‘sufficient fence’ in relation to a dividing fence or a boundary fence. Local governments may deal with any issues about fencing between property and thoroughfares by using item 4(1) of Division 1, Schedule 3.1 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act). This provides that a local government may serve a notice on an owner of a property to ensure that land that adjoins a public thoroughfare or other public place is suitably enclosed to separate it from the public place and where applicable, is enclosed with a close fence, to the satisfaction of the local government, suitable to prevent sand and other matter coming from the land onto the public place. It is specified for the purposes of this item by the City of Rockingham Local Government Property and Public Places Local Law 2018 that it is suitably enclosed to separate it from the public place.
Details
The primary focus of the proposed Fencing Local Law is to set out what constitutes a ‘sufficient fence’, with updates to reflect current practice or development. This is done via Schedules to the draft local law, and which have separate provisions for what constitutes a sufficient fence in residential and special residential zones, commercial or industrial zones, and rural and special rural zones. Generally, a sufficient fence does not need a permit under the local law, and cases where a sufficient fence does need a permit are prescribed in Parts 2-4 of the local law. In essence, if a dividing fence does not satisfy the requirements of the relevant Schedule (and, therefore, is not a ‘sufficient fence’), and if it is not agreed to by the adjoining owners, it will require a permit to be lawful. In summary: • Part 1 of the draft local law sets out administrative provisions and definitions. In the event of a conflict between the local law and the local planning scheme, the scheme prevails. • Part 2 provides that without the agreement of a neighbour a person must not erect a fence that is not a sufficient fence or alter the level of ground so as to affect the height of a sufficient fence. Nothing allows persons to erect a dangerous fence without a permit from the City. This Part establishes the requirements for a sufficient fence via Schedules, and provides that a person must obtain a permit from the City to erect a fence in a front setback area or a secondary frontage that does not comply with the provisions of clauses 2.3 and 2.4. Clause 2.6 requires fences to be maintained, and clause 2.7 requires approval from the City to be obtained where a fence is proposed to contain razor wire or other material with spiked or jagged projections. Clause 2.8 sets out requirements with respect to gates in fences, including the requirement to obtain a permit from the City to install a gate in a dividing fence that separates property from a reserve or public thoroughfare. • Part 3 deals with tennis court fences. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 26
• Part 4 requires anyone who wishes to erect a fence that is electrified, or contains barbed and razor wire needs a permit from the City. • Part 5 sets out permit requirements, and Part 6 deals with appeals. • Part 7 sets out enforcement provisions, which include notices requiring compliance, modified penalties (on the spot infringements) of $250 as listed in Schedule 4, and prosecution for serious offences. Note that the maximum allowable penalty under a local law is $5,000. If adopted by Council, the proposed local law will be advertised for public comment and the results reported before finalisation.
Comments
Parts of the proposed Fencing Local law have been written to be in harmony with planning legislation and the City’s planning policies. Due to some matters dealt with by the City, there has been a section added about Estate Boundary fencing. This was requested by Council at the August 2020 Council Meeting. In circumstances where all or part of an Estate Boundary Fence is failing, it is seen as appropriate that the replacement fencing matches the adjoining fence by way of colour and material as far as practicable. If this is not done there is a penalty for failure to repair an estate boundary fence as per clause 2.6(3).
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority
Implications to Consider a. Consultation with the Community The process to make a local law is set out in section 3.12(3) of the Local Government Act 1995. Amongst other things this requires a local government to give state-wide and local public notice stating that it proposes to make a local law, the purpose and effect of which is summarized in the notice for a period of 6 weeks after it first appears. The results of the community consultation and feedback from the Minister(s) are to be considered by Council before it makes the local law. The purpose and effect of the local law is: Purpose: The purpose of this local law is to provide what constitutes a ‘sufficient fence’ for the purposes of the Dividing Fences Act 1961 and to state the materials to be used and safety measures to be undertaken in relation to some types of fencing. Effect: Fencing in the district will need to comply with the definition of a ‘sufficient fence’ as stipulated in the local law and its other provisions. b. Consultation with Government Agencies As part of the process, local governments are required to send a copy of proposed local law to the Minister for Local Government. In addition, in relation to this local law a copy is to be sent to the Minister for Commerce as well, being the Minister responsible for the Dividing Fences Act 1961. c. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective contained in the Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective governance – Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical and compliant environment.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 27 d. Policy To be read in conjunction with the City’s relevant Planning Policies and Town Planning Scheme No. 2. e. Financial Funds have been allocated in the budget for costs associated with drafting, advertising and eventual Gazettal of the proposed local law. f. Legal and Statutory Section 3.12 of the Act provides the procedure for making local laws that needs to be followed to for the local law to be valid. Section 3.12(2) to (4) of the Act provides the initial procedure for making local laws. (2) At a council meeting the person presiding is to give notice to the meeting of the purpose and effect of the proposed local law in the prescribed manner. (3) The local government is to — (a) give Statewide public notice stating that — (i) the local government proposes to make a local law the purpose and effect of which is summarized in the notice; and (ii) a copy of the proposed local law may be inspected or obtained at any place specified in the notice; and (iii) submissions about the proposed local law may be made to the local government before a day to be specified in the notice, being a day that is not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given; and (b) as soon as the notice is given, give a copy of the proposed local law and a copy of the notice to the Minister and, if another Minister administers the Act under which the local law is proposed to be made, to that other Minister; and (c) provide a copy of the proposed local law, in accordance with the notice, to any person requesting it. (3a) A notice under subsection (3) is also to be published and exhibited as if it were a local public notice. (4) After the last day for submissions, the local government is to consider any submissions made and may make the local law* as proposed or make a local law* that is not significantly different from what was proposed. * Absolute majority required. g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment: High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety: Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Advisory Committee Recommendation 2 of 6: Proposed Waste Local Law 2020 (Absolute Majority)
That Council: 1. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer in accordance with sections 3.12(3)(a) and (3a) of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act), to give State wide and local public notice stating that: • It is proposed to make a Waste Local Law 2020, and a summary of its purpose and effect; • Copies of the proposed Amendment local law may be inspected at the City’s offices; Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 28
• Submissions about the proposed local law may be made to the City within a period of not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given; 2. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer In accordance with s3.12(3)(b), as soon as the notice is given, to supply a copy to the Minister for Local Government, the Minister for the Environment and the CEO of the Waste Authority; 3. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer In accordance with s3.12(3)(c) of the Act, to supply a copy of the proposed local law to any person requesting it; and 4. NOTES that that the results will be presented to Council for consideration of any submissions received.
Officer Recommendation if Different to Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
The Officer’s Reason for Varying the Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
Background
The City is in the process of updating its local laws. In December 2016 Council received the outcomes of a review required under s3.16 of the Local Government Act 1995 which indicated that a number of local laws required amendments or to be repealed. This report deals with waste collection and disposal. Part 4 of the City of Rockingham Health Local Law 1996 and in particular clauses 39 to 44 and 46 to 48 deal with waste and waste collection. Existing Health local laws were made under the Health Act 1911. A new Public Health Act came into effect in 2016 which repealed various provisions of the Health Act. These dealt with the powers of local governments in relation to the collection and removal of rubbish, and had the effect of transferring the powers of a local government to make local laws about waste to the Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act 2007. • A previous proposed City of Rockingham Waste Local Law 2018 was adopted by Council for public consultation at the May 2018 Council Meeting. Any Waste Local Law must be signed off by the Director General of the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER). The Waste Local Law 2018 proposed a few different clauses from the Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) Template Waste Local Law. • The City wrote to the Minister for Environment; Disability Services in July 2018 about the Proposed Waste Local Law 2018 advising the local law process had started and that the City was seeking public submissions. • In August 2018 the Director General of the DWER advised they had been referred the correspondence from the City and would provide comment as soon as practicable. • The City wrote to DWER in September 2018 seeking a response if possible by 31 October 2018. • A response was received from DWER in October 2018 advising that they were reviewing the Waste Local Law and would advise once comments have been considered. • In February 2019 the City received comments from DWER regarding the City’s Waste Local Law 2018. The comments included 16 changes that would need to be made before the CEO of DWER would consider consent. • In 2018 and 2019 extensive internal consultation and legal advice was sought regarding the changes to the local law. • In March 2020 after internal consultation a Proposed Waste Local Law 2020 was sent to the Director General of DWER for comment. • A response was received in April 2020 advising that: “The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation does not encourage amendments to the WALGA Template Waste Local Law because the template has received general approval from the Joint Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation.” Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 29
Details
A proposed new City of Rockingham Waste Local Law is attached. It is based on a WALGA Template Waste Local Law. There is only one difference from the model local law and the proposed local law. The addition of Item 29 in the Schedule 2 – Prescribed offences.
Item No. Clause No. Description Modified Penalty 29 3.3 Depositing household, commercial or other waste $100 into, or removing waste from, a receptacle provided for the use of the general public in a public place without approval
Clause 3.3 is already in the template local law. The main reason for the addition of a modified penalty is to deter the general public from removing waste from bins in public places without approval. This is especially important with the introduction of the new legislation for the Container Deposit Scheme. As there is a possibility that the new scheme will encourage people to look for recyclable containers that receive a refund in public bins. Clause 3.2 is already in the template local law and deals with deposit and removal of waste from a receptacle from premises, for example people’s bins on verges put out for collection. There is a corresponding penalty for this clause. This clause will hopefully deter people from removing waste from people’s bins due to the new Container Deposit Scheme. The draft local law is divided into 5 Parts: 1. Definitions. 2. Disposal of refuse – this Part deals with rubbish receptacles, placement on streets for collection, the use of receptacles and what may be placed in them, and other provisions to ensure that waste is able to be removed efficiently. 3. General duties of owners and occupiers in relation to waste. 4. Operation of Waste facilities; and 5. Enforcement provisions – including a Schedule of modified penalties that may be imposed. In summary, there are few practical differences between how current provisions relating to waste are dealt with; the proposed new local law simply puts them into a more up to date legislative framework.
Comments The proposed local law will improve ease of application and reflect changes in other legislation. Due to previous comments by DWER advising that it discourages any changes from the WALGA Template Waste Local Law, the City has decided to only add one change being the additional of a modified penalty. This change is relatively minor as the clause is already in the WALGA Template Waste Local Law. The only change is attaching a modified penalty to this clause. The main reason for the addition of a modified penalty is to deter the general public from going through public bins. The City anticipates this behanviour might be engaged in because of the introduction of the Container Deposit Scheme
Implications to Consider a. Consultation with the Community The process to make a local law is set out in section 3.12(3) of the Local Government Act 1995. Amongst other things this requires a local government to give state-wide and local public notice stating that it proposes to make a local law, the purpose and effect of which is summarized in the notice for a period of 6 weeks after it first appears. The purpose and effect of the local law is: Purpose: The objective of this local law is to regulate the storage, collection and disposal of waste and refuse from premises and on waste facilities in the City. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 30
Effect: Unless otherwise authorised, the storage, collection and disposal of waste and refuse within the City must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the local law. There will be a notice in the West Australian, Sound Telegraph, Weekend Courier and the City’s website. During the community consultation period the proposed local law will be made available on the City’s website, libraries and Administration Centre. The results of the community consultation and feedback from the Minister are to be considered by Council before it makes the local law. b. Consultation with Government Agencies As part of the process, local governments are required to send a copy of the proposed Amendment local law to the Ministers for Local Government and the Environment. The City is also required to obtain the consent of the CEO of the Waste Authority before finally making the local law under s3.12(4) of the Local Government Act 1995. d. Policy Not Applicable e. Financial Funds have been allocated in the budget for costs associated with drafting, advertising and eventual Gazettal of the proposed local law. f. Legal and Statutory Section 61 of the Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery specifies that waste local laws are to be made in accordance with the process set out by sections 3.11 to 3.17 of the Local Government Act 1995. Section 3.12 of the Act provides the procedure for making local laws that needs to be followed to for the local law to be valid. Section 3.12(2) to (4) of the Act provides the initial procedure for making local laws. (2) At a council meeting the person presiding is to give notice to the meeting of the purpose and effect of the proposed local law in the prescribed manner. (3) The local government is to — (a) give Statewide public notice stating that — (i) the local government proposes to make a local law the purpose and effect of which is summarized in the notice; and (ii) a copy of the proposed local law may be inspected or obtained at any place specified in the notice; and (iii) submissions about the proposed local law may be made to the local government before a day to be specified in the notice, being a day that is not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given; and (b) as soon as the notice is given, give a copy of the proposed local law and a copy of the notice to the Minister and, if another Minister administers the Act under which the local law is proposed to be made, to that other Minister; and (c) provide a copy of the proposed local law, in accordance with the notice, to any person requesting it. (3a) A notice under subsection (3) is also to be published and exhibited as if it were a local public notice. (4) After the last day for submissions, the local government is to consider any submissions made and may make the local law* as proposed or make a local law* that is not significantly different from what was proposed. * Absolute majority required.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 31 g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment: High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety: Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Advisory Committee Recommendation 3 of 6: Meeting Schedule – 2021 Election
That Council APPROVES the following meeting schedule for September to November 2021 – September 2021 Tuesday 7 September Proposed Councillor Engagement Session Monday 13 September Planning and Engineering Services Committee Tuesday 14 September Corporate and Community Development Committee Tuesday 21 September Ordinary Council Meeting Tuesday 28 September Proposed Councillor Engagement Session October 2021 Monday 4 October Planning and Engineering Services Committee Tuesday 5 October Corporate and Community Development Committee Tuesday 12 October Ordinary Council Meeting Saturday 16 October Election Day Tuesday 19 October Swearing in Ceremony (Swearing in – Crs/Mayor and photos) Tuesday 26 October Special Council Meeting (Elect Deputy Mayor and Committee Appointments) November 2021 Tuesday 9 November Proposed Councillor Engagement Session Monday 15 November Planning and Engineering Services Committee Tuesday 16 November Corporate and Community Development Committee Tuesday 23 November Ordinary Council Meeting
Officer Recommendation if Different to Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
The Officer’s Reason for Varying the Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
Background
Some concern has been raised by newly elected Councillors about the timeframes from being elected and then having to participate in the decision-making process through Committees and Council meetings. This short timeframe is acknowledged and it would be valuable to orientate and induct new Councillors before their participation in meetings. Applying the current Governance and Meeting Framework arrangements the following calendar of meetings will occur – Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 32
September 2021
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Engagement Session
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Planning and Corporate and Engineering Community Services Development Committee Committee
27 28 29 30 Council Meeting
October 2021
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Engagement ELECTION Session
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Special Planning and Corporate and INDUCTION Council Engineering Community Meeting Services Development Committee Committee
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Council INDUCTION INDUCTION Meeting
Details
A more suitable arrangement could be to bring forward both the September and October 2021 ordinary meeting schedule to allow the sitting Council to participate in the decision making process, allowing the new Councillors time between the October 2021 election and the November 2021 meeting schedule to familiarise themselves to their role. It is proposed that the ‘swearing in’ ceremony move to the Tuesday evening (after election).The ensuing days will accommodate new Councillor induction and orientation so that they are better informed and prepared to participate in the decision making process. The following Tuesday would involve a Special Council meeting to elect the Deputy Mayor and to appoint Councillors to various committees and representative positions. The proposed meeting schedule will occur as follows – Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 33
September 2021
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
1 2 Open 3 4 5 Nominations
6 7 8 9 Close 10 11 12 Engagement Nominations Session
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Planning and Corporate and Engineering Community Services Development Committee Committee
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Council Meeting
27 28(if Req.) 29 30 Engagement Session
October 2021
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Planning and Corporate and Engineering Community Services Development Committee Committee
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Council ELECTION Meeting
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 INDUCTION Special Council INDUCTION INDUCTION Meeting Swear in Crs / Mayor
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 INDUCTION Special Council INDUCTION INDUCTION Meeting select Committees
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 34
November 2021
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 INDUCTION INDUCTION INDUCTION
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Engagement Session
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Planning and Corporate and Engineering Community Services Development Committee Committee
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Council Meeting
29 30
Comments
The above proposal provides over three weeks before Councillors need to participate in the regular meeting schedule of decision making, providing time for induction and training, allowing new Councillors to ‘settle in and acclimatise’ to their roles and responsibilities. The City would provide briefing or inductions on both general and specific topics through these three weeks.
Implications to Consider a. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective contained in the Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective governance – Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical and compliant environment. b. Policy Not Applicable c. Financial Nil d. Legal and Statutory Nil e. Voting Requirements Simple Majority Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 35 f. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Advisory Committee Recommendation 4 of 6: Minor Amendment – Strategic Development Framework
That Council ADOPTS the amended Council Policy – Strategic Development Framework, as follows – Strategic Development Framework Policy Council Policy Objective To: – • Identify and explain the elements of the City’s Strategic Development Framework. • Prescribe the forums in which each of the elements of the framework are formulated, reviewed, discussed and approved. • Define the involvement and role of the community, staff and elected members in the process. • Identify the timing of the various activities within the framework. Council Policy Scope Councillors, staff, stakeholders and members of the community involved or participating in the strategic development process. Council Policy Statement Councillors, staff, stakeholders and members of the community involved or participating in the strategic development process. The Strategic Community Plan Definition An aspirational plan driven by the community that sets the long-term vision for the city and establishes the key focus areas that Council must attend to for if the vision is to be served. Forum Independently facilitated workshops attended by community members, followed up with a Councillor,/ Community Representative/ and Sstaff member Wworkshop. Process for Development of Review Major Review 1. Community establishes the foundation of the plan. 2. Council/Staff/Community Representatives Council, staff and community representatives summarise the plan’s foundations and further develop the vision and key focus areas. 3. Staff further refine the vision and key focus areas and submit a draft Strategic Community Plan to Council via the Corporate and Community Development Standing Committee for approval. 4. Council adopts the final plan after a community consultation period. Minor Review 1. Staff collate feedback, form from community consultation program and submit it to Council for adoption with recommended changes via the Corporate and Community Development Standing Committee.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 36
Timeline • Major Review every four years. • Minor Review every two years. Community Plan Strategies Definition Plans and strategies that focus upon specific areas of Council involvement or activity. Examples are: • The Community Safety Strategy • The Local Planning Strategy • The Economic Development Strategy • The Seniors Strategy All strategies must be congruent with the higher level key focus areas and aspirations established in the Strategic Community Plan and contain discrete, costed and deliverable tasks that will facilitate effective and measurable outcomes. Forum Advisory Committee meetings, community workshops, community group meetings, Councillor Engagement Sessions. Process for Development or Review New or Major Review 1. A Sstrategic Ddiscussion is to be facilitated at a Councillor Engagement Session as the first stage of the development of a new strategy or the major review of an existing strategy. 2. The Sstrategic Ddiscussion will be informed by a discussion paper that provides background, data and other relevant information on the major issues facing the City with in regards to the subject matter. 3. A draft Community Plan Strategy informed by the outcomes of the Sstrategic Ddiscussion and engagement with relevant stakeholder groups and advisory committees is then to be prepared. 4. The draft strategy is to be submitted to a Councillor Engagement Session followed by consideration at the relevant Standing Committee and Council for endorsement and public advertising. 5. A recommended final strategy incorporating community consultation outcomes is submitted to Council via the relevant Standing Committee for final consideration. Minor review 1. Staff are to submit minor review recommendations to Council via the standing committee for adoption after engagement with relevant advisory committee and community stakeholders. Timing • Major reviews as needed. • Minor reviews as needed. every two years. The Community Infrastructure Plan Definition A ten year planning instrument that identifies costs and prioritises the City’s community infrastructure development program. The annual priorities identified in the plan inform the Major Project Plan component of the City Business Plan. Forum Council Advisory Committees, Council Standing Committees, Councillor Engagement Sessions. Process for Review All new items with a capital cost of more than $2 million must be submitted to Council for consideration after explanation at a Councillor Engagement Session. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 37
Any existing item that is subject to either a 20% or $2 million cost variation; whichever is the lesser shall be submitted to Council for consideration after explanation at a Councillor Engagement Session. Council will consider the impact that the variation might have on the City’s overall financial capacity and determine the future form and status of the project. The Community Infrastructure Plan will be subject to a full annual review. The review is to provide the following information on each project: • Details of the original needs analysis and justification of the project • Details of the original scope, scale, form and function of the project • Details of the original costing and verification of the current costing • Details, justification and the cost of any amendments to the original scope of the project • Assessment as to whether the originally intended purpose remains relevant. The Plan is to be discussed at the August Councillor Engagement Session followed by adoption at the September meeting round. Team Plans Definition A ten year planning document that explains the key activities of a Council Team in detail for the first three years then in a more general context for the remaining seven years. The team plan’s role is to demonstrate how the “day to day” functions of the team will be undertaken, what services will be delivered and what operating projects will be undertaken over the life of the plan. Operating projects delivering tasks and actions identified in cCommunity pPlan sStrategies are also identified. Progress reports on all operating projects identified in team plans are reported upon monthly in the Council Bulletin. The team plans will also identify and demonstrate the need for new team resources such as new staff, vehicles, plant and equipment and technical apparatus. Team plans form the basis of the operational component of the budget and financial projections contained therein are used to formulate the draft budget that is submitted to Council for discussion and approval. Forum Team Managers will provide a full briefing to Councillors of their Team Plans explaining their future activities, projects, services and other relevant information. Process for Development or Review 1. Staff prepare Team Plans which are approved by the Executive. 2. Council can amend Team Plan components in City Business Plan Reviews or Budget Adoption process. Timing Team Plan briefings to Council are undertaken in March of each year. The City Business Plan Definition The City’s principal business planning tool projecting each year’s revenue and expenditure over a ten year period, the first three years being detailed and the following seven years of a more general nature. The main components and drivers of the City Business Plan are: A Revenue Strategy that predicts the revenue, (rates, grants, fees and charges) that the City anticipates receiving over the life of the plan. A compilation of the Team Plans that provides ten year income and expenditure projections related to the day to day operations of the City along with operating projects, both team based and also those identified as key actions within Specific Plans and Strategies. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 38
An annual contribution to asset management as identified in the Asset Management Plan. A Major Infrastructure Plan that identifies ten year expenditure details for major capital works. The plan is underpinned by a series of subsidiary ten year plans prioritising construction or reconstruction of footpaths, roads and parks and reserves and other civic infrastructure. A Lending and Reserve Transfer Strategy that identifies the loans the City will raise over ten years and the monies that will flow in and out of reserve funds. This strategy will also establish safe lending limits to ensure that the City’s financial sustainability and stability is not threatened by inappropriately high levels of debt. Forum Council will receive detailed briefings where revisions of the plan will be highlighted and discussed. Process for Development and Review 1. Staff prepares the City Business Plan and brief Council. 2. Council adopts the City Business Plan via Corporate and Community Development Standing Committee. Timing Council Engagement Sessions in November and April of each year. Council adoption in December and May of each year. The Annual Budget Definition A statutory document that activates and delivers year one of the City Business Plan. The revenue and expenditure estimates contained within the City Business Plan are used to inform the development of the budget. Forum Two briefings and special meeting of Council (if requested). Process for Development and Review 1. Staff prepare draft budget based upon year one of the City Business Plan and provide briefings to Council. 2. Council deliberates upon budget at Special Meeting (if requested) then gives final adoption at Council meeting via Corporate and Community Development Standing Committee. Timing Councillor Engagement Session in May Special or Ordinary Council meeting in June or July for adoption. Definitions Nil Legislation Local Government Act 1995 – Sect 5.56 Planning for the future (1) A local government is to plan for the future of the district. (2) A local government is to ensure that plans made under subsection (1) are in accordance with any regulations made about planning for the future of the district. Other Relevant Policies/Key Documents Nil Responsible Division General Management Services Review Date July 2023 Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 39
Officer Recommendation if Different to Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
The Officer’s Reason for Varying the Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
Background
The Strategic Development Policy was adopted by Council in 2010 and subsequently reviewed in 2015, 2018 and 2019. The Policy drives the City of Rockingham’s approach to strategy development and guides the participation of Councillors, officers, the community and stakeholders in the process. Some minor amendments have been identified. In the most part these are typographical, grammatical and formatting changes. There is one change of substance relating to the review requirements for a Community Plan Strategy.
Details
A Community Plan Strategy focuses on a specific area of local government activity / service delivery. It must align with the Strategic Community Plan. Currently a Community Plan Strategy has the following review requirements – • Major Review as needed. • Minor Review every two years It is proposed to amend the minor review requirements to ‘as needed’, to align with the major review requirements.
Comments
In practice a Community Plan Strategy is a dynamic document that needs to be responsive to changes to the Strategic Community Plan as well as the shifting environment impacting the activity / service delivery. As a consequence these plans are reviewed operationally on an ongoing basis and any changes required brought to Council’s attention as they arise. The Council Policy – Policy Framework identifies an adoption process for all new or substantially amended Council Policies, including a public consultation period. Given the minor nature of the amendments it is not considered necessary to seek public submissions on this occasion.
Implications to Consider a. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective contained in the Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective governance – Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical and compliant environment. b. Policy Amendment of the current Strategic Development Framework Policy. c. Financial Nil d. Legal and Statutory Nil Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 40 e. Voting Requirements Simple Majority f. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Advisory Committee Recommendation 5 of 6: Minor Amendment – Policy Framework
That Council ADOPTS the following amendment to the Council Policy – Policy Framework – Amend the first paragraph under the heading ‘Procedure Manual’ to read – “Procedure Manuals are to be managed by individual Directors. They need to be established for each Directorate with a section for each team and reviewed at least on an annual basis every three years by the Director. Each amendment and review date must be recorded on the Manual for audit purposes.”
Officer Recommendation if Different to Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
The Officer’s Reason for Varying the Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
Background
The Council Policy – Policy Framework was adopted by Council in June 2013 and subsequently amended in September that year. The City has recently reviewed the Policy and considers that it is still ‘fit for purpose’ with a minor exception in respect to the review requirements for organisational procedures.
Details
Under the ‘Procedures Manual’ section of the policy, it is stated that procedure manuals need to be established for each directorate and reviewed at a minimum on an annual basis by the Director. As a general observation, procedures are regularly reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure that they are relevant and appropriate and fit the service delivery requirements of the City. Notwithstanding this, it is proving operationally challenging for all procedures to be reviewed by Directors on an annual basis. It would be more appropriate for the minimum review period be every three years, aligning with the review period for Council and Executive Policy.
Comments
It is recommended that the Policy be amended as follows – “Procedure Manuals are to be managed by individual Directors. They need to be established for each Directorate with a section for each team and reviewed at minimum on an annual basis every three years by the Director. Each amendment and review date must be recorded on the Manual for audit purposes.” The Council Policy – Policy Framework identifies an adoption process for all new or substantially amended Council Policies, including a public consultation period. Given the minor nature of the amendment it is not considered necessary to seek public submissions on this occasion.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 41
Implications to Consider a. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective contained in the Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective governance – Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical and compliant environment. b. Policy Amendment of the current Council Policy – Policy Framework. c. Financial Nil d. Legal and Statutory Nil e. Voting Requirements Simple Majority f. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Advisory Committee Recommendation 6 of 6: Councillor COVID-19 Briefings
That Council ENDORSES the reduction of the electronic Councillor COVID-19 update from once a week to ‘as required’.
Officer Recommendation if Different to Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
The Officer’s Reason for Varying the Advisory Committee Recommendation
Nil
Background
At its meeting held 23 June 2020 Council, in resuming normal decision making processes, resolved to reduce the weekly COVID-19 update from twice weekly to once a week.
Details
Given the progress of the COVID-19 response it is now appropriate to publish the Councillor COVID-19 update on an ‘as required’ basis.
Comments
Nil
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 GM-024/20 PAGE 42
Implications to Consider a. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective contained in the Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Effective governance – Apply systems of governance which empower the Council to make considered and informed decisions within a transparent, accountable, ethical and compliant environment. b. Policy Nil c. Financial Nil d. Legal and Statutory Nil e. Voting Requirements Simple Majority f. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-026/20 PAGE 43
Community Development
Community Development Community Capacity Building Reference No & Subject: CD-026/20 Recommendations from the Community Grants Program Advisory Committee Meeting held on 17 September 2020 File No: GRS/48-05 Author: Ms Andrea Clark, Community Development Officer Other Contributors: Ms Jillian Obiri-Boateng, Collaborative Manager Community Capacity Building Mr Gary Rogers, Manager Community Infrastructure and Planning Ms Mary-Jane Rigby, Community Safety and Support Services Mr Scott Jarvis, Manager Economic Development and Tourism Mrs Belinda Trowbridge, Coordinator Community Capacity Building Ms Kasey Sheridan, Community Infrastructure Project Officer Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Disclosure of Interest: Cr Liley declared an Impartiality Interest in item CD-026/20 Recommendations from the Community Grants Committee meeting as detailed in Clause 3.3 of Council’s Code of Conduct and Regulation 11 of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 and as per section 5.65 of the Local Government Act 1995, as she is a financial seven day member of the Rockingham Golf Club Incorporated. Cr Sammels declared an Impartiality Interest in Item CD-026/20 - Recommendations from the Community Grants Committee, as detailed in Clause 3.3 of Council’s Code of Conduct and Regulation 11 of the Local Government (Rules of Conduct) Regulations 2007 and as per section 5.65 of the Local Government Act 1995, as he is patron of Rotary Club of Rockingham Inc., Rockingham Golf Club Incorporated and Safety Bay Tennis Club Inc. Nature of Council’s Role in Executive this Matter: Attachments: Minutes of the Community Grants Program Advisory Committee Meeting held on 17 September 2020 Maps/Diagrams:
Purpose of Report
For Council to approve the Community Grants Program Committee Recommendations as listed in the report.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-026/20 PAGE 44
Recommendations to the Corporate and Community Development Committee
Advisory Committee Recommendation 1 of 1: Approvals and non approvals of the Community Grants Program Round Two 2020/2021
That Council APPROVES the allocation of funds for Major Event Sponsorship, Major Grants and City Infrastructure Grants under the 2020/2021 Community Grants Program Round Two, subject to listed additional conditions: Amount Committee Major Event Sponsorship Requested Recommendation ($) ($) A. Australian Skateboarding Federation 20,000 for 20,000 for one Rockingham Rumble - WA Skateboarding three years year Championships Additional Grant Conditions: • Subject to the latest health advice of WA COVID-19 roadmap indicative date regarding the removal of WA’s hard border. City of Rockingham funding will not be paid to your organisation subject to this indicative date. • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19.
B. Baldivis Primary School P&C Association Inc. 20,000 (2021 20,000 (2021 year Baldivis Country Fair year one and one) subsequently 15,000 (2022 year 15,000 year two) two 2022; 13,000 year 13,000 (2023 year three 2023) three) Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to provide an opportunity for the City of Rockingham Mayor to speak at the event. C. Peel District Cycling Club Inc. 2020/2021 Summer Racing Program 2021 Winter 10,000 10,000 Racing Program Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19. D. Rockingham Regional Environment Centre Inc. 4,448.80 3,448.80 Naragebup Festival 2020 Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19. E. Rotary Club of Rockingham Inc. 10,000 10,000 Rockingham Rotary Market Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-026/20 PAGE 45
Amount Committee Major Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) F. Singleton Deo Gloria Community Church Inc. 7,136.30 7,136.30 Singleton/Golden Bay Carols Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19. G. Southern Communities Advocacy Legal and Education Service Inc. (SCALES) 4,350 4,350 Homeless Prevention Strategy - Help to Clean Up Program H. The Lions Club of Rockingham Inc. 10,000 10,000 The Lions 201 W2 District Convention 2021 Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19. I. Triathlon Western Australia Incorporated 10,000 6,000 Foreshore Triathlon Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19.
Amount Committee Community Infrastructure Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) J. Singleton Social and Sporting Association 50,000 50,000 Tennis Court Resurfacing Additional Grant Conditions: • If the project does not receive funding through CSRFF, SSSA must either confirm an alternative source of funding, or submit the revised scope of works to the City for approval. K. Rockingham Golf Club Incorporated 17,490 17,490 Solar PV Array Additional Grant Conditions: • Grant funding will be subject to structural engineer roof assessment. In the event structural roof issues are found the RGC will be responsible to complete any required works prior to claiming grant funding. L. Safety Bay Tennis Club Club Facility Development Needs and Feasibility 20,000 20,000 study. M. Safety Bay Petanque Club 3,940 3,940 Shed Extension Additional Grant Conditions: • All lessor consent conditions are to be met as listed. • Obtain approval from the City’s Health Team in regard to the conversion of the current storage shed into a Clubroom.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-026/20 PAGE 46
That Council NOT APPROVES the allocation of funds for Major Grants and Community Infrastructure Grants under the 2020/2021 Community Grants Program Round Two: Amount Committee Major Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) N. Tourism Rockingham Inc. 5,017.70 0 Rockingham Tourism Ambassador Program
Amount Committee Community Infrastructure Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) O. Baldivis Little Athletics Centre 10,000 0 Equipment Shed
Officer Recommendation if Different to Advisory Committee Recommendation
That Council APPROVES the allocation of funds for Major Event Sponsorship, Major Grants and City Infrastructure Grants under the 2020/2021 Community Grants Program Round Two, subject to listed additional conditions: Amount Committee Major Event Sponsorship Requested Recommendation ($) ($) A. Australian Skateboarding Federation 20,000 for 20,000 for one year Rockingham Rumble - WA Skateboarding three years Championships Additional Grant Conditions: • Subject to the latest health advice of WA COVID-19 roadmap indicative date regarding the removal of WA’s hard border. City of Rockingham funding will not be paid to your organisation subject to this indicative date. • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19.
B. Baldivis Primary School P&C Association Inc. 20,000 (2021 20,000 (2021 year Baldivis Country Fair year one and one) subsequently 15,000 (2022 year 15,000 year two) two 2022; 13,000 year 13,000 (2023 year three 2023) three) Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to provide an opportunity for the City of Rockingham Mayor to speak at the event. C. Peel District Cycling Club Inc. 2020/2021 Summer Racing Program 2021 Winter 10,000 10,000 Racing Program Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-026/20 PAGE 47
Amount Committee Major Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) D. Rotary Club of Rockingham Inc. 10,000 10,000 Rockingham Rotary Market Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19. E. Singleton Deo Gloria Community Church Inc. 7,136.30 7,136.30 Singleton/Golden Bay Carols Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19. F. Southern Communities Advocacy Legal and Education Service Inc. (SCALES) 4,350 4,350 Homeless Prevention Strategy - Help to Clean Up Program G. The Lions Club of Rockingham Inc. 10,000 10,000 The Lions 201 W2 District Convention 2021 Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19. H. Triathlon Western Australia Incorporated 10,000 6,000 Foreshore Triathlon Additional Grant Conditions: • Your organisation is to follow the health advice provided by the WA Health Department in regards to COVID-19.
Amount Committee Community Infrastructure Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) I. Singleton Social and Sporting Association 50,000 50,000 Tennis Court Resurfacing Additional Grant Conditions: • If the project does not receive funding through CSRFF, SSSA must either confirm an alternative source of funding, or submit the revised scope of works to the City for approval. J. Rockingham Golf Club Incorporated 17,490 17,490 Solar PV Array Additional Grant Conditions: • Grant funding will be subject to structural engineer roof assessment. In the event structural roof issues are found the RGC will be responsible to complete any required works prior to claiming grant funding. K. Safety Bay Tennis Club Club Facility Development Needs and Feasibility 20,000 20,000 study. L. Safety Bay Petanque Club 3,940 3,940 Shed Extension Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-026/20 PAGE 48
Amount Committee Community Infrastructure Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) Additional Grant Conditions: • All lessor consent conditions are to be met as listed. • Obtain approval from the City’s Health Team in regard to the conversion of the current storage shed into a Clubroom.
That Council NOT APPROVES the allocation of funds for Major Grants and Community Infrastructure Grants under the 2020/2021 Community Grants Program Round Two: Amount Committee Major Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) M. Tourism Rockingham Inc. 5,017.70 0 Rockingham Tourism Ambassador Program
Amount Committee Community Infrastructure Grants Requested Recommendation ($) ($) N. Baldivis Little Athletics Centre 10,000 0 Equipment Shed
The Officer’s Reason for Varying the Advisory Committee Recommendation
On 23 September 2020 the Rockingham Regional Environment Centre Inc. confirmed via email that they were withdrawing their grant request as the Naragebup Festival will not be held in 2020. The organisation stated that they will reapply via the Community Grants Program should they intend to hold a future event. Therefore the committee recommendation for the Rockingham Regional Environment Centre Inc. has been removed from the list of approved Major Grants.
Background
The City is committed to supporting incorporated not-for-profit organisations/associations, or those limited by guarantee (e.g. community groups and clubs) to assist with the delivery of programs, projects and events that benefit the Rockingham community. Major Grants, Major Event Sponsorship and Community Infrastructure Grants are advertised three times per year and presented to Council for approval. Applications for round two were invited from the community and closed 4.30pm Friday, 7 August 2020. A total of 16 applications were received in round two of the CGP, one was reassigned for assessment under the General Grants. The remainder were classified into the following categories: • Major Event Sponsorship – two applications • Major Grants – eight applications (including the Rockingham Regional Environment Centre Inc. application which has now been withdrawn) • Community Infrastructure Grants – five applications
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-026/20 PAGE 49
Implications to Consider a. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objectives contained in the Strategic Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 1: Actively Pursue Tourism and Economic Development Strategic Objective: Coastal destination: Promote the City as the premier metropolitan coastal tourism destination Investment Attraction: Attract local and international investment to the City to contribute to the local economy. Attractions and events: Seek to host iconic community events and attractions that will entice residents and visitors throughout the year. Aspiration 2: Grow and Nurture Community Connectedness and Wellbeing Strategic Objective: Community Capacity Building: Empower the community across all ages and abilities to be culturally aware and involved with a diverse range of community initiatives that incorporate volunteering, sport, culture and the arts. b. Policy The CGP operates in line with the CGP Policy and the Governance and Meeting Framework Policy. c. Financial Should Council approve the Officer recommendation, there will be $428,442.51 remaining of an allocated 2020/2021 budget of $600,000. It should be noted that this balance changes on a daily basis due to the General, Travel and Youth Encouragement grant requests. Should Council approve the CGP Committee recommendation for the City Infrastructure Grants, there will be $48,570 remaining of a 2020/2021 budget allocation of $154,000. d. Legal and Statutory Not Applicable e. Voting Requirements Simple Majority g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 50
Community Development Community Safety and Support Services Reference No & Subject: CD-027/20 Lockers for people experiencing homelessness File No: CSV/1029-20 Proponent/s: Cr Hayley Edwards Author: Ms Mary-Jane Rigby, Manager Community Safety and Support Services Other Contributors: Ms Kolina Brennan, Coordinator Community Safety and Support Services Ms Kristy Mills, Community Development Officer (Community Support Services) Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Previously before Council: 23 June 2020 Disclosure of Interest: Nature of Council’s Role in Executive this Matter:
Site: Lot Area: Attachments: Maps/Diagrams:
Purpose of Report
To provide Council with the outcomes of the investigation to identify a suitable location and model of storage solution to be accessed by people experiencing homelessness.
Background
At the Council Meeting held on 23 June 2020, the following resolution was passed; That Council: 1. SUPPORTS the concept of installing a storage solution that can be accessed by people experiencing homelessness. 2. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer to conduct an investigation to identify a suitable location, storage model and undertake community consultation. 3. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer to present the outcomes of the investigation to Council at the October 2020 Council meeting. 4. NOT SUPPORT upgrading one public shower in Rockingham to include hot water. 5. DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer to work with existing providers of showers and laundry services, including mobile providers, to extend their service provision.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 51
Details
People experiencing homelessness often have limited options to store their belongings which can be prohibitive for them to access services for support. As such, this can lead to articles such as clothing, bedding and personal items being left behind in public areas which in turn can negatively impact on public open space aesthetics and perceived feelings of safety within key community locations (i.e Rockingham foreshore area). Storage Options A number of storage options to secure personal belongings for people experiencing homelessness were investigated. The findings of which are summarised below: • Commercial storage units • Communal storage bins • Community use lockers Commercial Storage Units: One model involves fostering partnerships with local commercial self-storage providers to accommodate short-term use for storage of personal belongings. The private self-storage providers in Rockingham and Port Kennedy provide secure facilities with individual lock codes on the storage units and CCTV surveillance at key locations within the facilities. These self-storage providers offer both short and long term storage options, with some offering a daily rate of $5.75. In addition, some offer insurance of goods at an additional cost. It is not uncommon for people experiencing homelessness and housing insecurity to utilise self- storage. Emergency relief providers often assist individuals and families with temporary self-storage solutions whilst in between accommodation. The City has been advised by one Rockingham self- storage provider that they have experienced tenants using the storage unit as a place to live. The facility is not designed to accommodate such arrangements, nor is it permitted by the storage providers. This type of activity has increased cleaning and utility costs at the facility and has resulted in an increase in criminal activity (namely theft) from the premise. As a means to manage the situation, the storage provider has implemented timing restrictions to limit the length of time a tenant is permitted to remain on site (i.e., tenants are now only permitted to be on-site for a maximum 2 hours per/24 hour period). The self-storage providers also advised they are currently at occupancy capacity. In addition, and for the reasons stated above, they believe the use of storage units within their facilities by people experiencing homelessness (for the purposes of short term storage of personal belongings) would have a negative impact on site aesthetics, as well as create a security risk for other tenants. Communal Storage Bins: Research into the feasibility of offering communal storage bins within the City was undertaken. This model is currently employed by the City of Sydney in partnership with local churches to assist with the management of personal belongings left in public spaces. The communal bins are used in three locations of where 90 or more people experiencing homelessness congregate. The communal bins are shared between two or three people and become the responsibility of those utilising the bin to manage and secure. Personal padlocks can be attached for security, with the understanding that the padlock can be cut-off by the City if needed. The bins are placed behind a fenced area and secured to the fence by a chain to prevent the bins from being moved and becoming a hazard on nearby streets. This option requires a community partnership to be established in a location where people congregate and is better suited to areas with larger numbers of people experiencing homelessness.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 52
Communal storage bins used in the City of Sydney Community Use Lockers: The third storage solution investigated was the concept of community lockers. The below image is an example of the free-standing lockers (containing a total of six individual compartments) installed by the City of Bunbury. The lockers are positioned close to services for the purpose of storing personal items for those people experiencing homelessness in their community. It has been recommended that the City investigate a locker system that is weather tested for a coastal environment. The City of Bunbury advised that in the two years since they installed lockers, wear and tear of the lockers along with rust has been significant and they are currently in the process of replacing doors. The below image is of one of the City of Bunbury’s community locker sites. It is this style of community locker that has been further investigated for this purpose in Rockingham, however it is to be noted that the locker is likely to be free standing in the proposed locations.
Lockers installed on the wall of the In Town Lunch Centre, Wittenoom Street, Bunbury The feasibility of installing a locker system was undertaken and the following key considerations were highlighted; • Locker unit to include a variety of locker size configurations to accommodate bags, backpacks and bedding • Locking security system that will automatically unlock after a designated time frame • Site Consideration • Site & Locker Management (Waste Management & Cleaning, After-hour Attendance) • Availability of weather resistance product (particularly rust proof) Details of each of the above considerations are explored in further detail below. Locker Configuration In order to gain an understanding of the size of lockers required, community consultation was undertaken with people experiencing homelessness. This consultation enabled officers to gain a better understanding of type and size of belongings that may be stored in community lockers if they were available.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 53
Recommendations that emerged from this consultation confirmed that the most appropriate configuration for this type of storage system would be a 12 locker unit (consisting of eight backpack size compartments, two sleeping bag size compartments and two swag size compartments). More specifically, the consultation indicated that 41% of people prefer a combination of all three size locker compartments.
Lockers to fit a backpack Lockers to fit a sleeping bag Locker to fit a swag (45cmx45cmx45cm) (40cmx50cmx85cm) (40cmx50cmx180cm) Locking System There are two forms of security locking systems available for community use lockers; 1: Key operated system 2: Pin code operating system The key operating system is likely to be problematic in terms of ongoing management requirements for the City. There is a high likelihood of keys being lost and or broken and higher maintenance requirements for the locking mechanism itself. The preferred method is a pin operated locking system that enables individual users to set their own single use pin to secure the locker. This system can be programmed (by the City) for the locker to automatically unlock after a designated period of time e.g.; 24 hours, 18 hours, 12 hours. The consultation with people experiencing homelessness indicated that they would prefer a 24 hour period to be set before the locker automatically opened without use of the pin code. The City of Bunbury use the pin system and currently have time period of 12 hour allocated before the lockers unlock automatically. Users have provided feedback that this timeframe is not adequate, therefore the City of Bunbury is looking to extend the period of time. It is recommended that should lockers be installed, that a time period of 18 hours be set for the lockers to automatically unlock. This may assist to reduce the opportunity of an individual permanently keeping belongings in a locker if it were to be programed at 24 hours.
Single Point Pin Locking System
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 54
Site Considerations The provision of lockers for the purpose of people experiencing homelessness is best placed close to the locations where people tend to reside. In Rockingham, this is problematic as there is not one centralised location of congregation, therefore selecting a locker site accessible to the intended users has been difficult. The site ideally will be close to public transport and support services that people experiencing homelessness are likely to need to access. The site is recommended to have existing lighting and CCTV cameras to deter criminal activity such as vandalism and antisocial behaviour. Should the proposed site be without existing lighting and CCTV cameras, this cost would need to be factored into the budget considerations. Site and Locker Management Management of the area around the lockers would be undertaken by Litterbusters, Waste Services and Ranger Services. A bin would need to be installed at the preferred site to dispose of any waste and this would require site works to prevent it from being removed. The site surrounding the lockers would be added to the existing schedule for Litterbusters to ensure the location remains free of rubbish and is maintained in a clean, hazard free condition. The lockers will also require cleaning inside and out to form part of a regular maintenance schedule. It is recommended that lockers are cleaned twice per week. If a user of the lockers was to experience any problems accessing the lockers after-hours, such as forgetting their nominated pin code, it may require the attendance from a City on-call officer managed by the Assets Management team. Whilst the site location must be well lit and offer a high level of passive surveillance to ensure the safety of users and officers maintaining the lockers, it is not recommended that City include this after-hours service to respond to requests. This is a measure to reduce and mitigate potential risk to City officer safety. It is recommended that signage be installed to indicate that the user must wait until the automated unlocking period re-sets the locker. Assessment Criteria In order to determine a preferred location for lockers to be installed, key assessment criteria were identified as a minimum prerequisite for the site. The following criteria was used to determine the location suitability in consideration of local need and accessibility for users: • Centralised location within the City of Rockingham • Ease of accessibility to public transport • CCTV and lighting available at the proposed site • Support services located near-by • Level of passive surveillance (traffic, people walking by etc.) • Level of perceived/real risk to community • Level of perceived/real risk to businesses • Impact on City of Rockingham operations
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 55
Proposed Locker Installation Locations Based on the above criteria, officers were unable to find a location that satisfied all of the assessment criteria requirements. The following three locations were identified on the basis of achieving the highest number of criteria. It is important to note that all proposed locations will require installation of CCTV, and an extensive resident and business community consultation process implemented for any site. At the time of writing this report, the exact site costings are not available due to location uncertainty.
Location 1 Corner Livingstone Road and Leach Crescent, Rockingham
Location 2 Intersection of Whitfield Street, Goddard Street and Simpson Avenue, Rockingham
Location 3 Corner of Dixon Road and Dowling Street, Rockingham
Three possible locations for the storage lockers
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 56
The following images represent the day and night appearance of each of the three proposed locations:
Night image Day image
Location 1: Corner Livingstone Road and Leach Crescent, Rockingham Night image Day image
Location 2: Intersection of Whitfield Street, Goddard Street and Simpson Avenue, Rockingham Night image Day image
Location 3: Corner of Dixon Road and Dowling Street, Rockingham
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 57
Location Assessment Criteria The table below outlines the criteria eligibility and outcome for each proposed location: = meets criteria = does not meet criteria
1 Corner Livingstone Road 2 Intersection of Whitfield 3 Corner of Dixon and Leach Crescent, Street, Goddard Street Road and Dowling Rockingham and Simpson Avenue, Street, Rockingham Rockingham Centralised location Close to support services CCTV installed Sufficient lighting at location Ease of access to public transport Passive Surveillance No/Minimal impact on City of Rockingham considerations No/Minimal Impact on Businesses No/Minimal Community Resistance Note: The bottom two criteria will be assessed in response to community and business consultation
Implications to Consider a. Consultation with the Community Consultation with people experiencing homelessness In March 2020 the City conducted a point in time count of the number of people experiencing homelessness resulting in a count of 45. Community consultation conducted with people with lived experience of homelessness for this report has been obtained from a total of 20 people. This figure represents approximately 44.5% of those people experiencing homelessness within the City of Rockingham. The consultation results are summarised below: • 85% of people said that there is a need for community use lockers • 55% of people said that they would use the community lockers if made available • 50% would utilise the lockers several times per week • 45% stated that they would not use the lockers, or if they did would only use occasionally • 41% stated that a combination of the three different sizes would be the preferred locker configuration • 68% stated that the maximum period of time they would need to secure their belongings would be for 24 hours Other feedback received highlighted a preference for lockers to be located centrally in the City precinct. Support Services Sector Consultation has been undertaken with the following key support agencies in the local area. A summary of the main findings is outlined below:
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 58
The Salvation Army In principle the Salvation Army does not support the installation of lockers on their property. If there is a genuine need for lockers, the Salvation Army would support the installation in a community location that is highly accessible. Anglicare WA Anglicare WA advised that the building is not owned by their organisation and belongs to the Anglican Church. Anglicare WA also advised that there would be other tenants in the building who may be impacted directly by the proposed installation of lockers at the site and suggested that installing the lockers at this location would not be supported. Community & Business Consultation In the absence of a preferred installation location, broader community consultation with residents and business owners has not been undertaken at this stage. Should Council determine to proceed with the installation of lockers at a specific location, further community consultation will be conducted to a minimum 400m radius of the proposed locker site. b. Consultation with Government Agencies Consultation was undertaken with several Local Government Authorities. A summary of their feedback is outlined below: City of Mandurah - advised that there are no current plans or consideration to install lockers and no budget allocation. City of Kwinana - currently do not have lockers installed and there is no demand to demonstrate the need to install this type of infrastructure within the community. City of Cockburn - advised they do not have lockers installed as there has not been an identified need by those people experiencing homelessness living in their catchment area. City of Perth - with the largest percentage of those people experiencing homelessness in Western Australia, it was confirmed they do not have lockers, nor are they looking to install lockers in the public realm. City of Joondalup - has investigated multi-use lockers for beachfront locations and determined not to proceed due to concerns including risk of vandalism, lack of suitable locations, concerns regarding impact on wider community and potential ongoing costs. City of Bunbury - the City of Bunbury installed two locker units (a total of 12 lockers in total) in two locations within the City. Both locker locations are located in their City precinct, with their primary purpose to support those people experiencing homelessness. The lockers are located at the rear of the Graham Bricknell Music Shell (Symmons Street) and at the front of the In Town Centre (52 Wittenoom Street). The project was costed at approximately $30,000 not including ongoing management costs. A significant concern cited by the City of Bunbury was that over the past two years, the level of rust, damage and wear and tear on the lockers has been substantial. The City of Bunbury are currently in the process of replacing doors. City of Busselton - has installed lockers at their leisure facility in the youth precinct with the main purpose being for use by youth, not people experiencing homelessness. City of Sydney - utilise large communal storage bins to assist with the management of personal belongings left in public spaces in partnership with local faith based organisation providing permission to locate the bins on their sites. c. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective(s) contained in the Strategic Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 2: Grow and nurture community connectedness and wellbeing Strategic Objective: Community Safety and Support - Provide support to residents and visitors so they feel safe and secure at home and outdoors
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 59
Community Support Services Strategy 2017-2022 Key Element 1: Building and Effective, Accessible and Sustainable Sector Provide governance support and leadership to the sector for collaborative or joined up approaches d. Policy State Homelessness Strategy Department of Communities’ Directions Paper for the 10-Year Strategy on Homelessness Western Australia 2019-2029 identifies the Department of Communities as the lead agency responsible for homelessness in Western Australia. e. Financial Initial installation cost The cost to purchase and install one 12 unit locker is approximately $11,000. This cost includes the purchase and delivery of the unit only. Indicative costs associated with the site works/installation are summarised below: • Form work and the laying of a concrete pad (1.6 cubic meters – 4m x 4m) will cost approximately $4,000. This cost does not include expenses related to the removal of site work waste. • Installation of one solar light will cost approximately $15,000 (this does not include site work expenses related to the installation). • Install of one waste bin, concrete base and pole to secure the bin is estimated at $600. • Preparation and submission of any legislative requirements such as a Traffic Management Plans. Total cost $30,600 (excluding the installation cost of CCTV which will vary considerably dependent on site selection) Internal management and ongoing costs Additional internal management costs have been summarised below, however it must be acknowledged that these costings are approximate estimates only: • Litter removal: $82.89/hour plus tipping fees (however, unless significant amounts would be negligible). Estimated requirement is once per week x 52 weeks = $4500 • Graffiti removal: $45.66/hour plus any materials. Estimated requirement twice per month at one hour per removal task x 12 months =$1100 • Cleaning- $82.89/hour, required at minimum once per week x 52 weeks = $4500 • On-call costs for Asset Maintenance Officers after-hours service: $64/hr for callouts 12am Monday – 12pm Saturday and $83/hr from 12pm Saturday – 12am Monday. It is difficult to estimate an annual call out cost based on the number of variables associated with this service eg; vandalism, lost/forgotten pin code, requirements for repair. Based on one call out per week for each time period x 52 weeks = $7700 Total cost $17,800 per year (must be noted this is a very approximate estimate only) f. Legal and Statutory Section 3.18 (3) of the Local Government Act (1995) states that “A local government is to satisfy itself that services and facilities that it provides (b) do not duplicate, to an extent that the local government considers inappropriate, services or facilities provided by the Commonwealth, the State or any other body or person, weather public or private”. Response to homelessness is primarily the remit of State and Federal Governments. The installation of infrastructure (such a storage lockers) for the primary purpose of servicing people experiencing homelessness could be considered, a State or Federal Government responsibility.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 60 g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Comments
In consideration of the research and consultation conducted with people experiencing homelessness, two of the three storage options investigated have some merit. Commercial storage units provide support to individuals and families with temporary self-storage solutions whilst in between accommodation. This does not require any support from the City as this service is already utilised by people in housing transition and financial support for this is available via emergency relief if needed. This option however, is not suitable for daily storage of personal belongings due to location of the facilities, and them not being designed for quick access, by a high turnover of tenants to store personal belongs on a daily basis. Further to this, local storage providers have indicated concerns based from previous occurrence with people experiencing homelessness attempting to live inside the units which is not acceptable. Officers believe that if Council was to progress with a storage solution for the purpose of people experiencing homelessness to temporarily store their belongings, the installation of community use lockers is the only realistic option. The consultation results with intended users, did not indicate a strong desire to regularly use this resource if it was made available and 45% of those consulted indicated that they would not use them or if they did, it would only be occasional. With this in mind, the potential installation of lockers may only service up to 20 people per year at an estimated cost to Council of $48,400 in year one and approximately $20,000 per year after. This does not include installation and ongoing costs associated with the management of CCTV. An extensive site investigation was conducted to identify a possible location for the installation of lockers which was aligned to a set of key assessment criteria. Based on that assessment, officers could not identify a suitable location that met all of the criteria. In order to meet the requirement of the Council resolution, officers have provided three locations for consideration. It must be noted that significant financial outlay for the installation of CCTV and/or lighting would be required across these sites. On a broader perspective, the injection of City funds for the delivery of the pending Assertive Outreach Program and funds allocated for Rockingham within the State Government Housing First Homelessness Initiative (HFHI) are expected to reduce the number of people experiencing homelessness. The HFHI addresses homelessness and rough sleeping by using a housing first approach, where people experiencing chronic homelessness are placed in housing as a first priority and then provided wrap-around support services to address complex needs such as mental health, and drug and alcohol issues. It is relevant to note, that the people experiencing homelessness who contributed to the consultation outcomes within this report, are the people that the Assertive Outreach Program and HFHI will be targeting. It is intended that the delivery of these programs will negate the need to install a storage solution. It is recommended, due to the injection of additional funds, that the City focus should be on supporting people experiencing homelessness by adhering to approved pathways into secure or long term stable accommodation rather than provide resources to supplement living homeless. In the absence of finding a suitable location that adheres to all of the criteria requirements, as well as consideration of all associated costs compared to anticipated benefits, Council should not support the installation of lockers. Should Council determine to install lockers at one of the three proposed locations, significant community and business consultation will be required.
Voting Requirements
Simply Majority
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CD-027/20 PAGE 61
Officer Recommendation
That Council NOT SUPPORTS the installation of a storage solution for people experiencing homelessness as there is no suitable location that meets the required key assessment criteria and the mixed feedback provided by potential users.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-027/20 PAGE 62
15. Motions of which Previous Notice has been given
Corporate Services
Corporate Services Director and Support Reference No & Subject: CS-027/20 Notice of Motion – Preparation of Alternate Business Plan File No: CPM/7-02 Proponent/s: Cr Craig Buchanan Author: Mr John Pearson, Director Corporate Services Other Contributors: Ms Helen Savage, Senior Projects Officer Date of Committee Meeting: 20 October 2020 Previously before Council: Disclosure of Interest: Nature of Council’s Role in Executive this Matter:
Site: Lot Area: Attachments: Maps/Diagrams:
Purpose of Report
To provide advice in response to the following Notice of Motion from Cr Buchanan – That Council DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer to prepare a Business Plan 2021/2022 – 2030/2031 to be received by Council no later than March 2021, said Business Plan to include a 0% rates increase for 2021/2022, and a standard 1.5% increase in each year thereafter.
Background
Cr Buchanan’s Notice of Motion included the following reasons: The economic effects of COVID-19 have been far-reaching, and have not yet played out. As a responsible Local Government, the City of Rockingham needs to remain cognisant of the economic climate in which it is operating when it sets its rates, fees and charges for 2021/2022 in the coming months. Amongst other economic considerations, we should be aware that: 1. Australia is currently experiencing its first recession in 30 years, with the June quarter national accounts for 2020 confirming the second consecutive period of negative growth in GDP across the country. Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-027/20 PAGE 63
2. The measure of all goods and services fell by 7% in the June quarter, following a 0.3% decline in the March quarter immediately prior, the largest quarterly fall on record, and in line with the worst predictions from economists (The West Australian, 2 Sept. 2020). 3. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) actually fell by 1.9% in the June quarter (latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures, released July 2020), leading some economists to predict deflation rather than inflation in the coming months (Financial Review, 27 July 2020). 4. While the Western Australian economy is performing marginally better than those in neighbouring States and Territories, the WA Treasury predicts a 3.1% contraction in the local economy over the course of 2020/21 (ABC News, 28 May 2020). 5. Announcing the WA Treasury predictions, State Treasurer Hon. Ben Wyatt MLA conceded that the economic impacts of COVID-19 had, and would continue to be, “devastating for West Australian businesses and households” (WAMN News, 28 May 2020). 6. WA’s unemployment rate is now officially sitting at 8.3% (Australian Govt. Labor Market Information Portal, July 2020), with the Premier admitting that the “true unemployment” figure may be closer to 10 or 11% (ABC News, 14 May 2020). 7. In September, Cooloongup was listed among the top 10 mortgage stress suburbs in Australia, with 4.8% of home owners in mortgage arrears (The West Australian, 3 Sept. 2020), amidst predictions that house prices could fall by as much as 30% before the economy begins to recover from COVID-19 restrictions (ABC News, 24 April 2020). 8. Anecdotal accounts of a significant rise in bank repossessions are difficult to accurately quantify, but continue to rebound throughout the local community. 9. The Federal Government has announced that it will dramatically reduce the Job Keeper allowance (down in some cases from $1,500 to $750 as of 28 Sept. 2020, and again to $650 as at 4 January 2021), with the scheme to end on 28 March 2021 (9News, 22 Sept. 2020). In other words, Residents across the City of Rockingham are already experiencing one of the most stressful financial years in recent memory, that stress is set to get worse before it gets better, and in some cases radically worse, and the City must therefore do everything it can to support and assist its residents. The most practical way it can do that is to cut its own financial cloth accordingly, and to assist by proposing as low an increase in rates, fees and charges as possible for 2021/22. Beyond that, I believe it is important that we address the assumption that rates will continue to rise and rise, year on year, in excess of inflation. I realise that there are a variety of views on this subject, and I am keen to see the Council engage in an open and honest conversation with ratepayers, and with its own members, on the subject. It is very difficult to facilitate such a conversation without a practical example of what rates tied to inflation might look like in so far as our spending model is concerned. For that reason, I am asking that we authorise the creation of a detailed, comparison Business Plan, based upon the assumption that inflation will sit at approximately 1.5% in the years ahead (the Reserve Bank having indicated that they don’t want to see it rise above 2%), and that we use that example going forward to engage in a conversation about rates, and there we each feel they should be pegged.
Details
Early financial modelling suggests the impact of COVID-19 on rate yield because of zero rate increases in the 2020/2021 financial year is $46.7 million over a future ten year period. It is estimated that the cost of Cr Buchanan’s motion is approximately $83.6 million. This means that approximately $130 million in rate revenue would need to be removed from the City’s forward planning and offsetting expenditure or alternative revenue sources found.
Implications to Consider a. Consultation with the Community Nil
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-027/20 PAGE 64 b. Consultation with Government Agencies Nil c. Strategic Community Plan This item addresses the Community’s Vision for the future and specifically the following Aspiration and Strategic Objective(s) contained in the Strategic Community Plan 2019-2029: Aspiration 4: Deliver Quality Leadership and Business Expertise Strategic Objective: Strategic and sustainable financial planning – Undertake long term resource planning and allocation, with prioritised spending on core services, infrastructure development and asset management. d. Policy Nil e. Financial Early financial modelling suggests the impact of COVID-19 on rate yield because of zero rate increases in the 2020/2021 financial year is $46.7 million over a future ten year period. It is estimated the cost of Cr Buchanan’s motion is approximately $83.6 million. This means that approximately $130 million in rate revenue would need to be removed from the City’s forward planning and offsetting expenditure or alternative revenue sources found. f. Legal and Statutory Section 5.56 (1) of the Local Government Act 1995 requires all local governments to provide a Strategic Community Plan that outlines the community long term direction of what the City wants to achieve. The City Business Plan has been prepared in accordance with Regulation 19DA of the Local Government (Administration) Regulation 1996. Regulation 19DA requires a local government to prepare a corporate business plan covering a period of at least four financial years each financial year. The plan must contain priorities in line with the Strategic Community Plan, internal operations planning, resource management and other integrated matters relating to long term financial planning. This must be adopted by absolute majority. It should be noted that a business plan prepared in accordance with Cr Buchanan’s motion will not align with the priorities of the Strategic Community Plan. Whilst not ideal, it is acceptable as the said plan is an alternate to the adopted position of Council. It will be prepared on a basis on affordability. Projects and/or services will be adjusted, delayed or removed to ensure the City remains financially sustainable. g. Risk All Council decisions are subject to risk assessment according to the City’s Risk Framework. Implications and comment will only be provided for the following assessed risks. Customer Service / Project management / Environment : High and Extreme Risks Finance / Personal Health and Safety : Medium, High and Extreme Risks Nil
Comments
The consequences of Cr Buchanan’s motion are significant should it be supported. Notwithstanding this request for the Chief Executive Officer to prepare an alternate business plan, there would seem little point in performing this parcel of work should the impacts be so significant as to make it unrealistic. Strategy The City of Rockingham has a well-developed and integrated strategic framework which is fully compliant with relevant legislation in the Local Government Act 1995. In effect, every layer of the framework is linked with the end process being an adopted budget and budget reviews. The City Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-027/20 PAGE 65
Business Plan is the financing document for approved strategies. Every community plan strategy and masterplan is adopted by Council after extensive community consultation. The business planning process captures all this information over a decade in advance to ensure the City can afford what it adopts. It is strongly recommended that Cr Buchanan seek a review of the strategies of the City first should he feel that the costs of running the City are too high. Should Council support Cr Buchanan’s motion, officers will be left to determine what projects or services are to remain, which is likely to be in conflict with the adopted strategies for the City. Development Contribution Plan In May, 2011, the Council resolved to introduce provisions through the adoption of Amendment No.114 to Town Planning Scheme No.2 (TPS2) to implement Development Contributions for community infrastructure through the introduction of Development Contribution Plan No.2 (DCP2). DCP2 enables the City to collect revenue from additional dwelling yield created through the subdivision and building process. Earlier this year the forecasted dwelling figures were reviewed, resulting in a 3,668 reduction of the estimated total dwelling growth over the life of DCP2, resulting in a $7.7 million decrease in the anticipated DCP2 revenue. The 20 year plan is anticipated to yield the City an estimated $49 million. During the March 2020 Ordinary Council meeting Council resolved (CS-008/20 – 2020/2021 Annual Budget): That Council DIRECTS the CEO to prepare the 2020/2021 Annual Budget for adoption by Council which includes the following requirements: 1. No increases in rates; 2. No increases in fees and charges; and 3. Financial allocations to deliver projects and services as best able to be achieved in consideration of the priorities as adopted in the December 2019 City Business Plan. The cost of the March 2020 resolution to the City in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is estimated to be approximately $47 million over the next ten years. This has effectively negated the anticipated revenue the City plans on receiving though the implementation of the 20 year DCP2. Given that DCP2 is enshrined in TPS2, it means the City has legal obligations on spending these funds and providing additional City-owned contributions to build the required infrastructure which has an estimated cost of $155 million. In effect, in 2011 the City committed to contributing to and building the community infrastructure in accordance with DCP2. Should the City not construct the community infrastructure, it is required to return the funds to the contributing entities. The estimated value of required future City contributions is $96 million. These contributions are planned for as part of the business plan adoption. It should also be understood that DCP2 has been prepared under the auspices of State Planning Policy 3.6 – Developer Contributions for Infrastructure. DCP2 is fully compliant with the policy requirements and infrastructure has been constructed to date in accordance with DCP2. Community Infrastructure Plan Where a local government seeks to collect development contributions for community infrastructure through its Development Contribution Plan, a supporting Community Infrastructure Plan (CIP) is required. The City is committed through TPS2 to the delivery of the infrastructure provided for through DCP2 (as explained above) and reviews the CIP annually to ensure alignment with DCP2 and give instruction to the adoption of the business plan. The CIP is a comprehensive strategic community asset planning document. Any reduction in future revenue does not change the City requirements to build the community asset, noting there may be some flexibility of timing. The City of Rockingham CIP is very comprehensive and includes initial scopes of the community infrastructure and detailed quantity surveyor costs which are indexed according to industry construction cost standards. The CIP though, is subservient to the revenue capacity of the City and the City cannot be forced to build something if the revenue does not exist to construct it. As explained above, should the City not have the funds to provide its own contributions to DCP2, determination will need to be made about the City’s capacity to support DCP2 and indeed a potential scheme amendment to TPS2.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-027/20 PAGE 66
Asset Management Plan The City’s Asset Management Plan is the document used to allocate current and future asset service requirement costs. This ensures funding for asset management is aligned with delivery of service, future demand, life cycle management, monitoring and asset improvement. The Asset Management Plan is critical to City service delivery and is widely regarded, next to the City Business Plan and budgeting documents, as one of the most important industry planning documents. The City has over $2.2 billion in fixed assets listed on its balance sheet. These are either constructed by itself or are gifted. History demonstrate the City is gifted between $15 to $30 million dollars per annum, depending on prevailing development conditions. Failing to maintain these assets to an adequate standard at best would result in decreased community service standards or at worst infrastructure failure causing personal injury or death. The City’s Asset Management Plan attempts to find the balance between infrastructure failure and service standards and the Business Plan allocates the resources to achieve these requirements. When considering the proposal to apply net 0% rates increase for a decade into the future, consideration needs to be given to the highly dependent position on rates contribution to revenue. Adjustments to rates revenue significantly impacts on what can be expected to be delivered throughout the City. Often these cuts occur in the least immediately visible functions of the City, like asset management. Business Plan The City’s Business Plan is the internal business planning tool that is reviewed each year to allocate financial resources to planned areas through the integrated strategic framework. This ensures financial sustainability to meet Council priorities, objectives and aspirations of the City’s Strategic Community Plan and Community Plan Strategies. In accordance with the Council Policy – Strategic Framework, the Business Plan is presented to Council for adoption twice per year in December and May. This allows the City to predict its future direction in a least risk environment and from adoption of strategy, adjust its revenue and expenditure accordingly. Specifically it is the strategy of the City which drives the Business Plan, not the other way around. The process used by the City exceeds the statutory requirement to review the Business Plan annually. This occurs to ensure that high strategic risk related to catastrophic financial failure is minimised. It is the May version of the Business Plan which is adopted to meet the City’s statutory requirements. The first year of the May Business Plan forms the first year of the Annual Budget which is presented to Council for adoption in June. Service Delivery Plans (team plans) are included in the Business Plan adoption which covers matters related to operational projects linked to adopted Strategic Community Plans outcomes and workforce planning. Other Matters Residential vs Non Residential Land The City is highly reliant on residential land for the total contribution of rates yield. In 2020/2021 the estimated rate yield is $92.2 million of $158 million in operating revenue. Note this does not include non-operating grants and revenue (loans and reserve transfers) nor developer gifted assets (non- cash). Residential land contributes 96.6% to the total number of rateable properties. Specifically the City hold 54,246 residential properties from a total of 56,127. As has been explained over previous years, this has significant strategic implications related to service delivery and continues to cause concerns as population growth continues in Rockingham without significant allocations of employment generating land. The City has acknowledged this. While rate yields are not a relevant planning consideration, work undertaken on the City’s Local Planning Strategy to date has identified an issue with the limited availability local employment opportunities relative to the City’s population. This is expected to worsen in the future if the substantial planned urban development is not balanced with the delivery of additional employment generating land and the Council has resolved to advocate for the provision of such in North East Baldivis. The impact of the above is significant. This is because the servicing cost for residential land is higher than the rate revenue it generates and the converse is true for non-residential land. The very high ratio of residential to non-residential land and projected growth in residential land is expected too far outpace growth in non-residential land, further exacerbating the issue.
Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-027/20 PAGE 67
In the short term, the City attempts to balance its revenue shortfall through non-rating activities, such as the operation of its landfill site. In the foreseeable future, the City expects to lose some, or possibly all of this income, which will further increase revenue pressure and its ability to deliver infrastructure, community services and efficiently provide required statutory services. In effect, Cr Buchanan’s motion is symptomatic of the very high disproportion amount of residential land in the City. This ratio has a direct correlation with the ability of a local government authority (LGA) to be financially self-sustainable. Similarly, it has a direct relationship with level of expenditure and therefore the level of services a LGA can offer, as well as the flexibility it has in implementing rate increases. Therefore, it is imperative for the City to seek solutions to generate the necessary revenue to appropriately service its constituency. The WA Economy, Jobs and COVID-19 Cr Buchanan’s reasons for his Notice of Motion relate to information available during the height of the pandemic impacts – around March to June 2020. Whilst likely correct at the time, the dire economic climate warnings appear to have adjusted significantly. The WA State Budget 2020-21 has just been released and includes the following information*: • The WA economy is expected to grow by 1.25% in 2020-21. • Growth in the WA domestic economy grew at 1.1% in 2019-20. WA was the only state to record positive growth. • The forecast for continued growth is supported by a range of economic indicators that have already returned to, and in most cases exceeded, pre-COVID levels, including household and business confidence, retail trade and jobs advertised online. Across most of these indicators, WA is leading the nation. • The state has recorded its largest ever monthly fall in unemployment in August 2020. • As at August 2020, more than 70% of jobs lost between February and May 2020 had been recovered. • Almost 90% of the fall in hours worked has also been recovered. • Online vacancies in August 2020 (according to the Department of Education, Skills and Employment) are at the highest levels since October 2014 and 6% higher than pre COVID levels. • The ABS job vacancy series indicates that between May and August 2020 job vacancies rose by a record 91.7% - the highest of any State. • The number of job vacancies in August 2020 exceeded pre-COVID levels and are at their highest since 2012. * Source- www.ourstatebudget.wa.gov.au/2020-21/fact-sheets/economy.pdf In support of the above information, the 2019-20 Annual Report on State Finances was released in September 2020 identifying the Western Australian economy as being the only domestic State to have actually grown by 1.1% over the 2019-20 year. Additionally, for a second consecutive year an operating surplus of $1.7 billion was achieved by the State after four years of operating deficits. Total public sector net debt at 30 June 2020 was $724 million, lower than estimated in the 2019- 2020 mid-year review. The 2020-21 WA State budget also forecasts that the Western Australia government is expected to continue to grow over the next four years with growth of 1.25% predicted for 2020-21 and for the first time in seven years the WA economy experienced an increase for a second consecutive year through business investment. Whilst the impacts of COVID-19 are undeniably substantial, it is evident that Western Australia is in a superior economic position compared to the rest of Australia. As such, the City has the opportunity to support the State’s fiscal strategy through continuing to allocate funds through City service delivery in meeting its objectives and indeed this position has been consistently supported by the State. CPI, Population Growth and Operating Costs CPI is a measure of the average change over time in the prices paid by households for a fixed basket of goods and services. In Australia, the CPI measures the changes in the price of a fixed basket of goods and services, acquired by household consumers. Cr Buchanan’s motion proposes an annual 1.5% increase in rates from year two to year ten. This is a reasonable best estimate of Corporate and Community Development Committee Agenda Tuesday 20 October 2020 CS-027/20 PAGE 68
CPI over a ten year period (between 1% and 2% annually). Note in the definition above the term “fixed basket of goods and services”. CPI is a like for like measure between two points in time. Given the population growth of Rockingham, which is almost double the state average, the measure holds little relevance. Each time a new facility is built, or indeed any infrastructure or new service is created, the “basket” is expanded and the operating costs of running the City increases accordingly. By default, in order to support the expanded operating costs the revenue generation will have to be greater than CPI. Examples of facilities or services build over the last decade which increase the operating costs of the City include: • Mary Davies Library and Community Centre • Baldivis South Community Centre • Secret Harbour Surf Lifesaving Club Building • Baldivis Sporting Complex (under construction) • Rockingham Youth Centre (under construction) • Numerous sporting pavilions and grounds • Litterbusters • $200+ million in developer gifted assets including roads, reserves, recreation facilities and lights With population growth at such high levels and construction service programs designed to support existing and growth population, it is unrealistic to expect operating revenues to be stagnant for a decade, particularly given the dependence on rates (rates coverage ratio) all local governments have. Should Council want to reduce rate yield, the focus of this decision making should be based on the strategies and plans for the future of the City and contracting these in order to reduce costs. Conclusion It is the officer’s opinion that preparation of a business plan on 1.5% increases (approximate CPI) over a decade is unrealistic for the following reasons: • CPI rate increases do not support the increased requirements of service delivery, asset management and infrastructure creation for rapid population growth local governments like the City of Rockingham. There are likely serious social consequences of not provided appropriate community infrastructure and community services to support population increases • Lack of focus on City strategy and no instruction to the Chief Executive Officer on what services and infrastructure should be deferred or stopped. • The likelihood of major delays, or altogether ceasing of DCP2 required infrastructure creation, causing conflict with City required infrastructure construction due to the DCP2 adoption in 2011. • The material change which would occur in the City’s financial risk profile and ability to respond to community needs in times of crisis (e.g. the recent industry leading example in response to COVID-19). It is imperative that the City have liquidity.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority
Officer Recommendation
Cr Buchanan’s Notice of Motion is not supported.
Notice of Motion from Cr Craig Buchanan
That Council DIRECTS the Chief Executive Officer to prepare a Business Plan 2021/2022 – 2030/2031 to be received by Council no later than March 2021, said Business Plan to include a 0% rates increase for 2021/2022, and a standard 1.5% increase in each year thereafter.
Attachment to CS-026/20
CITY OF ROCKINGHAM
BUDGET REVIEW
September 2020 Attachment to CS-026/20
STATEMENT OF REVENUE & EXPENDITURE (OPERATING AND CAPITAL) BY DIRECTORATE
BUDGET REVIEW - SEPTEMBER 2020 Attachment to CS-026/20
City of Rockingham 2020/2021 Amended Budget Summary of Budget Position
2020/2021 2020/21 2020/21 New 2020/21 YTD Carry Adopted Amended Amendments Amended Budget Summary Actuals Forwards Budget Budget Budget $ $ $ $ $ $ Operating Expenditure (178,140,500) (178,140,500) (27,498,888) (1,224,568) (72,933) (179,438,001) Operating Revenue 165,908,625 165,908,625 125,649,655 4,841,239 0 170,749,864 (12,231,875) (12,231,875) 98,150,767 3,616,671 (72,933) (8,688,137) Write Back Depreciation 37,786,319 37,786,319 0 0 0 37,786,319 Write Back Profit/Loss on Sale of Assets (3,185,803) (3,185,803) 0 0 0 (3,185,803) Write Back Non-Cash Leased Asset 0 0 0 0 0 0 Write Back Change in Accrued Leave 229,016 229,016 0 0 0 229,016
Net Operating Result 22,597,657 22,597,657 98,150,767 3,616,671 (72,933) 26,141,395
Non Operating Expenditure (91,269,184) (91,269,184) (6,177,176) (1,697,907) (6,113,335) (99,080,426) Non Operating Revenue 40,950,590 40,950,590 384,486 (6,185,705) 0 34,764,885
Net Capital Movements (50,318,594) (50,318,594) (5,792,690) (7,883,612) (6,113,335) (64,315,541)
Net Overall Result (27,720,937) (27,720,937) 92,358,077 (4,266,941) (6,186,268) (38,174,146)
Add: Opening Surplus/(Deficit) 24,287,948 24,287,948 35,056,960 4,582,744 6,186,268 35,056,960 Add: Restricted Funds (Unspent Grants) 2,592,989 2,592,989 3,382,606 789,617 0 3,382,606 Add: Restricted Funds (Municipal Bonds) 1,962,448 1,962,448 1,805,089 (157,359) 0 1,805,089 Add: Restricted Funds (Bert England Lodge) 3,588,080 3,588,080 3,602,036 13,956 0 3,602,036
Total Opening Surplus/(Deficit) 32,431,465 32,431,465 43,846,691 5,228,958 6,186,268 43,846,691
Closing Surplus/(Deficit) 4,710,528 4,710,528 136,204,768 962,017 0 5,672,545
Less: Restricted Funds (Unspent Grants) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less: Restricted Funds (Municipal Bonds) (1,962,448) (1,962,448) (1,805,089) 157,359 0 (1,805,089) Less: Restricted Funds (Bert England Lodge) (3,588,080) (3,588,080) (3,602,036) (13,956) 0 (3,602,036)
Closing Surplus/(Deficit) After Restricted Funds (840,000) (840,000) 130,797,643 1,105,420 0 265,420
Sum of Current Period Amendments Column Labels Capital Capital Total Operating Operating Total Grand Total Row Labels Expense Income Expense Income Community Development 2,354,844 0 2,354,844 (378,088) (4,137,101) (4,515,189) (2,160,345) Community and Leisure Facilities 25,194 0 25,194 32,665 (579,122) (546,457) (521,263) Community Capacity Building 0 0 0 (10,000) (2,995) (12,995) (12,995) Community Development Directorate and Support 0 0 0 Community Infrastructure Planning 2,329,650 2,329,650 47,538 (3,503,899) (3,456,361) (1,126,711) Library and Information Services (41,698) (24,085) (65,783) (65,783) Economic Development and Tourism 0 0 0 Community Safety and Support Services (406,593) (27,000) (433,593) (433,593) Corporate Services 162,546 6,193,903 6,356,449 474,295 1,129,258 1,603,553 7,960,002 Corporate Directorate & Support 0 0 0 71,771 0 71,771 71,771 Customer and Corporate Support 13,489 13,489 238,155 (150) 238,005 251,494 Financial Services 0 6,193,903 6,193,903 136,369 1,291,188 1,427,557 7,621,460 Waste Services 149,057 149,057 28,000 (161,780) (133,780) 15,277 General Management Services 203,739 0 203,739 203,739 CEO Directorate and Support 0 0 0 Governance and Councillor Support 0 0 0 0 Human Resource Development 221,384 0 221,384 221,384 Strategy, Tourism, Marketing and Communications (17,645) 0 (17,645) (17,645) Legal Services and General Counsel 0 0 0 Director Legal Services and General Counsel 0 0 0 Planning and Development Services 0 0 0 219,526 (150,125) 69,401 69,401 Compliance and Emergency Liaison 0 0 50,728 (149,625) (98,897) (98,897) Planning Directorate and Support 0 0 95,000 95,000 95,000 Statutory Planning 22,025 (500) 21,525 21,525 Strategic Planning and Environment 0 0 51,773 0 51,773 51,773 Health and Building Services 0 0 0 0 Land and Development Infrastructure 0 0 0 0 0 0 Engineering and Parks Services (819,483) (8,198) (827,681) 705,096 (1,683,271) (978,175) (1,805,856) Asset Services 69,918 0 69,918 126,660 0 126,660 196,578 Engineering Directorate and Support 22,179 0 22,179 22,179 Engineering Services (31,747) (8,198) (39,945) 469,963 (1,505,089) (1,035,126) (1,075,071) Parks Services 315,971 315,971 (66,006) (178,182) (244,188) 71,783 Infrastructure Project Delivery (1,173,625) (1,173,625) 152,300 152,300 (1,021,325) Grand Total 1,697,907 6,185,705 7,883,612 1,224,568 (4,841,239) (3,616,671) 4,266,941
Page 1 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Adopted Amended Current Period Carry Account Details New Budget Budget Budget Amendments Forwards
Operating Operating Projects - Community Safety - Safer Community Grant 266,593 266,593 (266,593) 0 0
Operating Expenses - Jetties & Boat Ramps - Jetty Maintenance 1,180,000 1,180,000 512,533 0 1,692,533
Operating Revenue - Recreation Grounds - Local Road & CIP Grant 0 0 (1,343,042) 0 (1,343,042) Operating Revenue - Streets, Rds, Bridges-Construc - MRD Road Recovery (1,044,980) (1,044,980) (261,246) 0 (1,306,226) Program (Capital) Operating Revenue - Streets, Rds, Bridges-Construc - MRRG Program (1,180,587) (1,180,587) 542,612 0 (637,975) (Capital) Operating Revenue - Streets, Rds, Bridges-Construc - State Black Spot (1,218,980) (1,218,980) (885,820) 0 (2,104,800) Projects (Capital) Operating Revenue - Aqua Jetty Stage 2 - WA Recovery Funding 0 0 (1,000,000) 0 (1,000,000)
Operating Revenue - Baldivis Indoor Recreation Cen - WA Recovery Funding 0 0 (2,500,000) 0 (2,500,000)
(1,997,954) (1,997,954) (5,201,556) 0 (7,199,510)
Capital Road - Port Kennedy Drive (Stage 1) - upgrade - Roads 80,440 80,440 (751,867) 693,427 22,000
Road - Port Kennedy Drive (Stage 1) - upgrade - Roads 80,440 80,440 (751,867) 693,427 22,000
Drainage - Drainage renewals at various locations - Drainage 649,290 649,290 (649,290) 0 0 Build-Baldivis District Sport Complex Stage 1 Pavi - Buildings & Fixed 5,379,618 5,379,618 803,080 138,691 6,321,389 Equipment Park -Baldivis District Sport Complex Stage 1 Oval - Parks, Reserves & 7,170,770 7,170,770 0 3,609,477 10,780,247 Foreshore / Contractors and Consultants Park - Sports Res Floodlighting Club Infra Upgrade - Parks, Reserves & 415,266 415,266 (415,266) 0 Foreshore Misc Infra - Construct Limestone Seawall Mersey Pt - Miscellaneous 1,343,042 1,343,042 (443,042) 900,000 Infrastructure Drainage - Upgrades Various Locations 20/21 - Drainage 0 599,344 649,290 1,248,634 Misc Infra-Baldivis District Sports Complex courts - Miscellaneous 803,080 803,080 (803,080) 0 Infrastructure Parks - St Raphael Infield Irrigation Replacement - Parks, Reserves & 0 0 250,000 250,000 Foreshore Road -Traffic treat Read St Council Ave Cygnus SBS - Roads 0 0 559,000 559,000
Road -Traffic treat Read St Chagrove Centurus SBS - Roads 0 0 339,000 339,000
Build - Aqua Jetty Stage 2 - Buildings & Fixed Equipment 0 0 1,600,000 1,600,000 Proceeds from Borrowings-Baldivis Indoor Rec Centr - Loan Funds / Loan (17,000,000) (17,000,000) 2,500,000 0 (14,500,000) Proceeds Transfer From Reserve - Capital Works - Capital Works Reserve / Reserve (3,693,903) (3,693,903) 3,693,903 0 0 Transfers
(4,771,957) (4,172,613) 6,579,861 5,135,022 7,542,270
Page 2 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate General Management Services Department CEO Directorate and Support
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
CEO Directorate and Support 1,263,481 1,263,481 237,946 0 0 1,263,481 Operating Expense Employee Costs - CEO Directorate & Support 821,881 821,881 224,564 0 0 821,881 Operating Expenses - CEO Directorate & Support 191,600 191,600 13,382 0 0 191,600 Operating Projects - CEO Directorate & Support 250,000 250,000 0 0 0 250,000 Grand Total 1,263,481 1,263,481 237,946 0 0 1,263,481
Page 3 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate General Management Services Department Human Resource Development
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Human Resource Development 1,980,779 1,980,779 419,881 221,384 15,000 2,217,163 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Human Resource 1,058,159 1,058,159 284,737 6,604 0 1,064,763 Employee Costs - Parental Leave 0 0 4,825 0 0 0 Employee Costs - Workers Compensation 0 0 72,108 0 0 0 Operating Expenses - Human Resource 897,620 897,620 83,010 254,780 0 1,152,400 Operating Projects - Human Resource 40,000 40,000 52,326 (40,000) 15,000 15,000 Income Operating Revenue - Workers Compensation 0 0 (67,959) 0 0 0 Operating Revenue - Human Resource (15,000) (15,000) (1,628) 0 0 (15,000) Operating Revenue - Parental Leave 0 0 (7,539) 0 0 0 Grand Total 1,980,779 1,980,779 419,881 221,384 15,000 2,217,163
Page 4 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate General Management Services Department Strategy, Tourism, Marketing and Communications
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Strategy, Tourism, Marketing and Communications 1,163,141 1,163,141 206,332 (17,645) 30,727 1,176,223 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Strategy and Communications 657,851 657,851 151,459 0 0 657,851 Operating Expenses - Strategy and Communications 403,350 403,350 35,430 0 0 403,350 Operating Projects - Strategy and Communications 104,440 104,440 19,443 (17,645) 30,727 117,522 Income Operating Revenue - Strategyand Communications (2,500) (2,500) 0 0 0 (2,500) Grand Total 1,163,141 1,163,141 206,332 (17,645) 30,727 1,176,223
Page 5 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate General Management Services Department Governance and Councillor Support
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Governance and Councillor Support 1,760,562 1,760,562 496,825 0 0 1,760,562 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Executive Services 633,515 633,515 162,264 0 0 633,515 Operating Expenses - Elections 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Operating Expenses - Executive Services 214,850 214,850 7,657 0 0 214,850 Operating Expenses - Members Expenses 866,897 866,897 326,904 0 0 866,897 Income Operating Revenue - Executive Services (3,500) (3,500) 0 0 0 (3,500) Operating Revenue - Members Expenses (1,200) (1,200) 0 0 0 (1,200) Grand Total 1,760,562 1,760,562 496,825 0 0 1,760,562
Page 6 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Community Development Department Community Development Directorate and Support
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Community Development Directorate and Support 567,079 567,079 153,223 0 0 567,079 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Community Developmt Dir/Support 514,067 514,067 145,828 0 0 514,067 Operating Expenses - Community Developmt Dir/Suppo 23,012 23,012 695 0 0 23,012 Operating Projects - Community Developmt Dir/Suppo 30,000 30,000 6,700 0 0 30,000 Grand Total 567,079 567,079 153,223 0 0 567,079
Page 7 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Community Development Department Economic Development and Tourism
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Economic Development and Tourism 1,506,048 1,506,048 248,395 0 (33,000) 1,473,048 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Investment Attraction 357,048 357,048 88,661 0 0 357,048 Operating Expenses - Investment Attraction 859,000 859,000 151,083 0 0 859,000 Operating Projects - Investment Attraction 290,000 290,000 8,650 0 (33,000) 257,000 Grand Total 1,506,048 1,506,048 248,395 0 (33,000) 1,473,048
Page 8 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Community Development Department Community Safety and Support Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Community Safety and Support Services 2,165,752 2,165,752 290,973 (433,593) (4,912) 1,727,247 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Community Safety 608,220 608,220 124,723 0 0 608,220 Employee Costs - Community Services Admin 370,578 370,578 103,021 0 0 370,578 Non Cash Expenses - Community Safety 1,830 1,830 0 0 0 1,830 Operating Expenses - Community Safety 408,445 408,445 72,772 0 0 408,445 Operating Projects - Community Services Admin. 60,000 60,000 6,986 0 0 60,000 Operating Projects - Community Services Admin 400,800 400,800 0 (150,000) (4,912) 245,888 Operating Projects - Community Safety 266,593 266,593 0 (266,593) 0 0 Operating Expenses - Community Support Services 204,286 204,286 10,574 10,000 0 214,286 Income Operating Revenue - Community Services Admin (150,000) (150,000) (27,000) (27,000) 0 (177,000) Operating Revenue - Youth Services (5,000) (5,000) (103) 0 0 (5,000) Grand Total 2,165,752 2,165,752 290,973 (433,593) (4,912) 1,727,247
Page 9 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Community Development Department Community Capacity Building
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Community Capacity Building 5,617,326 5,617,326 701,490 (15,000) 48,384 5,650,710 Capital Expense Misc PPE - Public Art Building Community Capacity 63,637 63,637 0 0 0 63,637 Misc Infra - Public Art Reserves 66,634 66,634 0 0 (270) 66,364 Misc PPE - Churchill Aboriginal Artwork 31,610 31,610 0 0 0 31,610 Misc Infra - Patterson R Founder Memorial Clock 10,000 10,000 0 0 15,778 25,778 Misc Infra - Churchill Major Artwork 45,133 45,133 33,030 0 32,876 78,009 Park - Public Art Parks Reserves and Foreshore CCB 26,114 26,114 0 0 0 26,114 Misc PPE - Secret Harbour Public art 50,000 50,000 0 (50,000) 0 0 Misc PPE - Baldivis South Comm Centre Public Art 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Misc PPE - Shoalwater Foreshore Redevelopment 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 Income Transfer From Reserve – Life Long Learning Reserve (340,000) (340,000) 0 0 0 (340,000) Operating Expense Employee Costs - CCB Administration 1,138,776 1,138,776 255,755 0 0 1,138,776 Employee Costs - CCB Arts & Culture 484,145 484,145 98,659 0 0 484,145 Employee Costs - CCB Sport & Recreation 280,248 280,248 89,987 0 0 280,248 Operating Expenses - CCB Active Ageing 288,450 288,450 23,874 (15,000) 0 273,450 Operating Expenses - CCB Administration 1,071,356 1,071,356 104,048 4,840 0 1,076,196 Operating Expenses - CCB Arts & Culture 1,735,868 1,735,868 76,839 (4,840) 0 1,731,028 Operating Expenses - CCB Community Developmt Yout 142,517 142,517 29,749 0 0 142,517 Operating Expenses - CCB Sport & Recreation 298,039 298,039 12,955 0 0 298,039 Operating Projects - CCB Administration 20,000 20,000 5,736 0 0 20,000 Operating Projects - CCB Arts & Culture 200,000 200,000 (355) 0 0 200,000 Operating Projects - CCB Sport & Recreation 0 0 241 0 0 0 Operating Expenses - Beach Patrol & Rescue Service 74,000 74,000 0 0 0 74,000 Income Operating Revenue - CCB Administration (10,000) (10,000) (1,238) 0 0 (10,000) Operating Revenue - CCB Arts & Culture (83,301) (83,301) (27,790) 0 0 (83,301) Operating Revenue - CCB Sport & Recreation (25,900) (25,900) 0 0 0 (25,900) Youth Centre 930,342 930,342 128,025 2,005 0 932,347 Operating Expense Employee Costs - CCB Community Developmt Youth 184,704 184,704 50,030 0 0 184,704 Employee Costs - Rockghm Outreach Youth Service 224,742 224,742 46,537 0 0 224,742 Employee Costs - Youth Services 324,235 324,235 62,589 0 0 324,235 Operating Expenses - CCB Community Developmt Yout 257,430 257,430 10,930 15,000 0 272,430 Operating Expenses - Youth Services 92,831 92,831 3,922 (10,000) 0 82,831 Operating Expenses - Youth Venue 27,000 27,000 0 0 0 27,000 Operating Expenses - Rockghm Outreach Youth Servic 13,000 13,000 1,070 0 0 13,000 Income Operating Revenue - CCB Community Youth Develop (8,600) (8,600) 0 0 0 (8,600) Operating Revenue - Rockghm Outreach Youth Service (185,000) (185,000) (46,999) (2,995) 0 (187,995) Operating Revenue - Youth Services 0 0 (54) 0 0 0 Arts Centre 89,000 89,000 5,008 0 0 89,000 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - CCB Arts & Culture 105,000 105,000 8,688 0 0 105,000 Income Operating Revenue - CCB Arts & Culture (3,000) (3,000) (3,681) (2,599) 0 (5,599) Operating Revenue - Arts Centre (13,000) (13,000) 0 2,599 0 (10,401) Grand Total 6,636,668 6,636,668 834,522 (12,995) 48,384 6,672,057
Page 10 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Community Development Department Library and Information Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Library and Information Services 4,421,314 4,421,314 935,611 (65,783) 0 4,355,531 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Library Services - Rockingham 637,645 637,645 193,411 0 0 637,645 Employee Costs - Library Services - Safety Bay 599,110 599,110 151,841 0 0 599,110 Employee Costs - Library Services - Warnbro 476,672 476,672 132,201 0 0 476,672 Employee Costs - Library Services Admin 263,123 263,123 66,863 0 0 263,123 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Rockingham 454,770 454,770 88,454 5,000 0 459,770 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Safety Bay 135,281 135,281 12,845 (24,890) 0 110,391 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Warnbro 236,097 236,097 22,829 (10,000) 0 226,097 Operating Expenses - Library Services Admin 335,624 335,624 54,923 (1,808) 0 333,816 Operating Expenses - Mary Davies Library & Comm. C 199,849 199,849 28,347 0 0 199,849 Operating Projects - Library Services Admin 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Employee Costs - Mary Davies Library & Comm Centre 860,264 860,264 224,373 0 0 860,264 Operating Expenses - Mary Davies Library & Comm 138,592 138,592 14,782 (10,000) 0 128,592 Operating Expenses - Baldivis South Community Cent 20,500 20,500 1,096 0 0 20,500 Operating Projects - Mary Davies Library & Comm. C 2,000 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 Non Cash Expenses - Library Services - Rockingham 227,037 227,037 0 0 0 227,037 Income Operating Revenue - Library Services - Rockingham (36,250) (36,250) (5,108) 0 0 (36,250) Operating Revenue - Library Services - Safety Bay (13,500) (13,500) (15,793) (12,014) 0 (25,514) Operating Revenue - Library Services - Warnbro (11,000) (11,000) (3,352) 0 0 (11,000) Operating Revenue - Library Services Admin (2,000) (2,000) 0 (12,000) 0 (14,000) Operating Revenue - Mary Davies Library & Communit (132,500) (132,500) (32,100) (71) 0 (132,571) Grand Total 4,421,314 4,421,314 935,611 (65,783) 0 4,355,531
Page 11 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Community Development Department Community Infrastructure Planning
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Community Infrastructure Planning 35,417,089 35,417,089 2,506,242 (1,126,711) 3,885,311 38,175,689 Capital Expense Build - Baldivis District Sportsplex Stage 1 416,103 416,103 27,849 0 39,018 455,121 Build-Baldivis District Sport Complex Stage 1 Pavi 5,379,618 5,379,618 15,843 803,080 138,691 6,321,389 Park -Baldivis District Sport Complex Stage 1 Oval 7,170,770 7,170,770 2,037,189 0 3,609,477 10,780,247 Parks - BMX Design & Construction 88,639 88,639 0 (88,639) 0 0 Build - Mackinnon St - Refit to Youth Facility 2,228,340 2,228,340 274,617 0 13,268 2,241,608 Parks - Koorana Reserve Upgrade Master Plan Detail 3,721,745 3,721,745 54,848 15,209 27,252 3,764,206 Build - Baldivis Indoor Recreation Centre 17,862,898 17,862,898 56,537 0 0 17,862,898 Build - Aqua Jetty Stage 2 0 0 0 1,600,000 0 1,600,000 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Community Infrastruct/Planning 499,314 499,314 127,307 0 0 499,314 Operating Expenses - Community Infrastruct/Plannin 265,162 265,162 18,025 3,899 0 269,061 Operating Projects - Community Infrastruct/Plannin 320,000 320,000 8,075 43,639 57,605 421,244 Income Operating Revenue - Recreation Grounds (165,500) (165,500) 0 0 0 (165,500) Operating Revenue - Youth Venue (985,000) (985,000) (110,149) 0 0 (985,000) Operating Revenue - Baldivis Sporting Complex (1,385,000) (1,385,000) 0 0 0 (1,385,000) Operating Revenue - Community Infrastruct/Planning 0 0 (3,899) (3,899) 0 (3,899) Operating Revenue - Baldivis Indoor Recreation Cen 0 0 0 (2,500,000) 0 (2,500,000) Operating Revenue - Aqua Jetty Stage 2 0 0 0 (1,000,000) 0 (1,000,000) Grand Total 35,417,089 35,417,089 2,506,242 (1,126,711) 3,885,311 38,175,689
Page 12 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Community Development Department Community and Leisure Facilities
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Aqua Jetty 1,225,001 1,225,001 267,073 8,245 0 1,233,246 Capital Expense Furn - Aqua Jetty - Pool blankets 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 Plant - Aqua Jetty Automatic Pool Cleaner 0 0 0 25,194 0 25,194 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Aqua Jetty 1,786,859 1,786,859 250,565 (16,949) 0 1,769,910 Employee Costs - Aqua Jetty 3,417,142 3,417,142 898,868 0 0 3,417,142 Income Operating Revenue - Aqua Jetty (4,019,000) (4,019,000) (882,361) 0 0 (4,019,000) Autumn Centre 548,632 548,632 85,358 50,000 0 598,632 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Autumn Centre 380,197 380,197 126,013 0 0 380,197 Operating Expenses - Autumn Centre 387,735 387,735 79,847 85,000 0 472,735 Income Operating Revenue - Autumn Centre (219,300) (219,300) (120,502) (35,000) 0 (254,300) Bert England Lodge 48,793 48,793 29,630 0 0 48,793 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Bert England Lodge 213,798 213,798 (1,965) 0 0 213,798 Employee Costs - CCB Bert England Lodge 9,913 9,913 2,488 0 0 9,913 Operating Expenses - Bert England Lodge (SC) 3,268,708 3,268,708 617,176 0 0 3,268,708 Income Operating Revenue - Bert England Lodge (3,443,626) (3,443,626) (588,070) 0 0 (3,443,626) Challenger Court (344,912) (344,912) (134,156) (37,900) 0 (382,812) Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Challenger Court 101,613 101,613 4,946 (37,900) 0 63,713 Employee Costs - CCB Challenger Court 9,913 9,913 2,488 0 0 9,913 Income Operating Revenue - Challenger Court (456,438) (456,438) (141,590) 0 0 (456,438) Challenger Lodge 3,542 3,542 5,265 0 0 3,542 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Challenger Lodge 3,542 3,542 5,265 0 0 3,542 Community and Leisure Facilities Coordination 751,489 751,489 189,369 0 0 751,489 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Community & Leisure Facil/Admin 687,320 687,320 182,020 0 0 687,320 Operating Expenses - Community & Leisure Fac/Admin 35,470 35,470 9,913 0 0 35,470 Operating Projects - Community & Leisure Fac/Admin 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Income Operating Revenue - Community & Leisure Faci/Admin (1,301) (1,301) (2,564) 0 0 (1,301) Community Halls 135,999 135,999 (21,533) 0 0 135,999 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - CCB Arts & Culture 45,238 45,238 5,874 0 0 45,238 Operating Expenses - Public Halls Civic Centre 372,236 372,236 37,775 0 0 372,236 Operating Expenses - Baldivis South Community Cent 35,995 35,995 9,222 0 0 35,995 Income Operating Revenue - Public Halls Civic Centres (317,470) (317,470) (57,953) 0 0 (317,470) Operating Revenue -Baldivis South Community Centre 0 0 (16,452) 0 0 0 Community Sport Reserves and Facilities (110,400) (110,400) (276,348) (480,192) 0 (590,592) Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Reserves Maintenance 1,350 1,350 409 0 0 1,350 Income Operating Revenue - Public Halls Civic Centres (25,000) (25,000) (9,780) 0 0 (25,000) Operating Revenue - Recreation Grounds (86,750) (86,750) (266,978) (480,192) 0 (566,942) Gary Holland Community Centre 161,838 161,838 5,450 0 0 161,838 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Gary Holland Community Centre 278,338 278,338 23,722 0 0 278,338 Income Operating Revenue - Gary Holland Community Centr (116,500) (116,500) (18,271) 0 0 (116,500) Goddard Street Youth Centre 138,441 138,441 13,543 0 0 138,441 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Goddard House Youth 143,441 143,441 13,543 0 0 143,441 Income Operating Revenue - Goddard House Youth (5,000) (5,000) 0 0 0 (5,000) Larkhill Complex 664,600 664,600 (3,493) 0 0 664,600 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Larkhill Complex 741,600 741,600 15,404 0 0 741,600 Income Operating Revenue - Larkhill Complex (77,000) (77,000) (18,898) 0 0 (77,000) Mike Barnett 521,262 521,262 31,028 (61,416) 0 459,846 Capital Expense Build - Mike Barnett netball court outdoor seating 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 15,000 Build - Mike Barnett digital outdoor signage 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 Build - Mike Barnett wall panelling 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Mike Barnett 381,376 381,376 71,171 2,514 0 383,890 Employee Costs - Mike Barnett 475,886 475,886 133,812 0 0 475,886 Income Operating Revenue - Mike Barnett (461,000) (461,000) (173,955) (63,930) 0 (524,930) Rockingham Aquatic Centre 796,941 796,941 198,141 0 0 796,941 Capital Expense Build - Aquatic Centre digital outdoor signage 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 Furn - Rockingham Aquatic Centre Pool blankets 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 Income Proceeds On Sale of Assets - Rockghm Aquatic Ctr (700) (700) 0 0 0 (700) Operating Expense Employee Costs - Rockingham Aquatic Centre 837,114 837,114 140,556 0 0 837,114 Non Cash Expenses - Rockingham Aquatic Centre (257) (257) 0 0 0 (257) Operating Expenses - Rockingham Aquatic Centre 303,484 303,484 60,557 0 0 303,484 Income Operating Revenue - Rockingham Aquatic Centre (462,700) (462,700) (2,971) 0 0 (462,700) Warnbro Recreation Centre 90,038 90,038 (3,814) 0 0 90,038 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Warnbro Recreation Centre 72,200 72,200 0 0 0 72,200 Employee Costs - Warnbro Recreation Centre 72,000 72,000 11,495 0 0 72,000 Income Operating Revenue - Warnbro Recreation Centre (54,162) (54,162) (15,309) 0 0 (54,162) Grand Total 4,631,264 4,631,264 385,511 (521,263) 0 4,110,001
Page 13 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Engineering Directorate and Support
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Engineering Directorate and Support 929,462 929,462 248,384 22,179 0 951,641 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Cemeteries 234 234 33,064 260 0 494 Operating Expenses - Reserves Maintenance 0 0 220 220 0 220 Employee Costs - Admin OH EPS Directorate 818,708 818,708 193,008 0 0 818,708 Operating Expenses - Admin OH EPS Directorate 171,380 171,380 7,844 0 0 171,380 Operating Expenses - Other Unclassified 0 0 28,549 21,699 0 21,699 Income Operating Revenue - Cemeteries (51,000) (51,000) (12,134) 0 0 (51,000) Operating Revenue - Admin OH EPS Directorate (9,860) (9,860) (2,167) 0 0 (9,860) Grand Total 929,462 929,462 248,384 22,179 0 951,641
Page 14 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Asset Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Asset Services 16,374,311 16,374,311 2,285,922 196,578 (8,793) 16,562,096 Capital Expense Computer -Various SiteEnergy Management Software I 41,011 41,011 0 0 0 41,011 Parks - Council Public area lighting Plan 247,558 0 0 0 0 0 Build - Autumn Centre refurbish kitchen fitout 0 0 6,680 6,680 0 6,680 Build - Kent St Art Centre rplce timber floor 28,314 28,314 0 0 0 28,314 Build -Warnbro Cricket Shed demolish and replace 59,781 59,781 0 0 0 59,781 Road - Replace Churchill & Bell Park lighting 58,675 58,675 0 0 0 58,675 Build-Cambridge Cr replace bus shelter stop 21301 20,506 20,506 0 (10,000) 0 10,506 Build - Council Ave replace bus shelter stop 2123 20,506 20,506 0 0 0 20,506 Build-Safety Bay Rd replace bus shelter stop 17326 20,506 20,506 0 (10,000) 0 10,506 Build-Rock'ham Bowling Club lean too remove/replac 23,043 23,043 26,471 2,697 0 25,740 Build - Administration Building Office Lighting 47,896 47,896 0 0 0 47,896 Parks - Mike Barnett Refurbishment Main Switchboar 0 0 0 9,000 0 9,000 Parks - Shoalwater Foreshore Lions Reserve SMSB 8,631 8,631 0 (8,631) 0 0 Parks - Anvils Circle Reserve Lighting 53,580 53,580 0 (53,580) 0 0 Build - Admin Bridge Wing Upgrade Loytec Controlle 0 0 4,600 4,600 0 4,600 Build - Port Kennedy comm centre electric meter 27,518 27,518 0 0 (8,793) 18,725 Build - Aquatic Centre Resid Babbingur Mia Refurb 0 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 Build - Rockingham Bowling Club Asbestos Removal 9,742 9,742 0 0 0 9,742 Park - Council Public area lighting Plan 20/21 0 247,558 0 0 0 247,558 Build - Various Sites Water efficiency initiatives 49,512 49,512 0 (18,000) 0 31,512 Build - Aqua Jetty - Electrical repairs 19,484 19,484 0 0 0 19,484 Build - Autumn Centre - Refurbish hairdressers 19,484 19,484 0 0 0 19,484 Build - Rockingham Aquatic Centre - External paint 34,096 34,096 0 0 0 34,096 Build - Warnbro Recreation Centre - Switchboard re 38,967 38,967 0 0 0 38,967 Build - Aqua Jetty outdoor storage units 9,742 9,742 0 0 0 9,742 Parks - Alf Powell Reserve Site Main Switchboard R 0 0 0 11,389 0 11,389 Build - Council Depot Pump Shelter 0 0 0 10,252 0 10,252 Parks - Catalpa Memorial New Solar Light Installat 0 0 0 7,999 0 7,999 Build - Shoalwater Res Changeroom Internal Storage 0 0 9,588 10,000 0 10,000 Build - Aqua Jetty - UV renewal 175,351 175,351 0 0 0 175,351 Build - Safety Bay Bowling Club - Switchboard rene 73,063 73,063 0 0 0 73,063 Build - Aqua Jetty upgrade lockers 9,742 9,742 0 0 0 9,742 Parks - Lagoon Reserve - Replace Flood Lights 0 0 2,026 16,000 0 16,000 Road - Centenary Pk rplc reserve lights & carpark 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 150,000 Build - Dog Pound Office Refurb internal & externa 0 0 69 0 0 0 Build - Rockingham Golf Clubroom Asbestos Removal 7,793 7,793 0 0 0 7,793 Build - Buildings - Urgent works 97,417 97,417 0 0 0 97,417 Parks - Stan Twilight Reserve Replace Playground S 0 0 29,405 29,405 0 29,405 Build - Aqua Jetty Creche AC Unit Replacement 0 0 0 12,107 0 12,107 Misc Infra - Cubbine Close New Public Walkway Ligh 0 0 0 40,000 0 40,000 Income Proceeds Sale of Assets - Admin OH Assets (5,500) (5,500) 0 0 0 (5,500) Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Animal Ctrl/Rangers General 18,729 18,729 3,022 0 0 18,729 Operating Expenses - Aqua Jetty 470,025 470,025 99,605 0 0 470,025 Operating Expenses - Autumn Centre 144,799 144,799 26,873 0 0 144,799 Operating Expenses - Bert England Lodge 6,660 6,660 0 0 0 6,660 Operating Expenses - CCB Arts & Culture 27,050 27,050 11,864 0 0 27,050 Operating Expenses - Cemeteries 22,875 22,875 2,934 0 0 22,875 Operating Expenses - Challenger Court 99,739 99,739 24,984 0 0 99,739 Operating Expenses - Challenger Lodge 5,871 5,871 5,919 0 0 5,871 Operating Expenses - Gary Holland Community Centre 86,324 86,324 22,136 0 0 86,324 Operating Expenses - Larkhill Complex 417,786 417,786 41,060 0 0 417,786 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Rockingham 13,167 13,167 4,116 0 0 13,167 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Safety Bay 34,508 34,508 4,495 0 0 34,508 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Warnbro 14,933 14,933 4,301 0 0 14,933 Operating Expenses - Lotteries House 132,452 132,452 23,881 60,000 0 192,452 Operating Expenses - Mary Davies Library & Comm. C 119,352 119,352 15,246 0 0 119,352 Operating Expenses - Maternal & Infant Health 9,132 9,132 4,955 0 0 9,132 Operating Expenses - Mike Barnett 165,017 165,017 53,659 (9,000) 0 156,017 Operating Expenses - Other Governance Expenses 1,548,182 1,548,182 233,630 (9,396) 0 1,538,786 Operating Expenses - Pre-school 16,491 16,491 388 0 0 16,491 Operating Expenses - Rockingham Aquatic Centre 58,376 58,376 26,522 0 0 58,376 Operating Expenses - Rockingham SES 7,436 7,436 1,176 15,660 0 23,096 Operating Expenses - Sanitation & Waste Services 3,343 3,343 14 0 0 3,343 Operating Expenses - Warnbro Recreation Centre 44,448 44,448 29,345 (10,000) 0 34,448 Operating Expenses - Youth Services 11,309 11,309 1,192 0 0 11,309 Operating Expenses - Youth Venue 36,139 36,139 215 0 0 36,139 Operating Expenses -Rockingham Day Care Centre 6,761 6,761 507 0 0 6,761 Reserves Maintenance - Baldivis Reserves 471,560 471,560 63,591 0 0 471,560 Reserves Maintenance - Cooloongup Reserves 122,519 122,519 39,556 16,732 0 139,251 Reserves Maintenance - Golden Bay Reserves 70,596 70,596 25,749 0 0 70,596 Reserves Maintenance - Harrington Waters 21,900 21,900 1,303 0 0 21,900 Reserves Maintenance - Hillman Reserves 35,004 35,004 1,427 0 0 35,004 Reserves Maintenance - Port Kennedy Reserves 127,609 127,609 19,211 0 0 127,609 Reserves Maintenance - Rockingham Reserves 480,924 480,924 80,161 (20,605) 0 460,319 Reserves Maintenance - Safety Bay Reserves 117,111 117,111 25,491 0 0 117,111 Reserves Maintenance - Secret Harbour Reserves 145,302 145,302 10,784 0 0 145,302 Reserves Maintenance - Shoalwater Reserves 35,186 35,186 5,289 0 0 35,186 Reserves Maintenance - Singleton Reserves 78,308 78,308 7,627 0 0 78,308 Reserves Maintenance - Waikiki Reserves 56,625 56,625 24,208 0 0 56,625 Reserves Maintenance- Warnbro Reserves 77,288 77,288 9,639 0 0 77,288 Operating Expenses - Investment Attraction 1,602 1,602 1,009 0 0 1,602 Operating Expenses - Millar Road Landfill Operatio 63,186 63,186 30,886 0 0 63,186 Operating Expenses - Public Halls Civic Centre 149,407 149,407 21,994 0 0 149,407 Operating Expenses - Community & Leisure Fac/Admin 37,760 37,760 5,513 0 0 37,760 Operating Expenses - Millar Rd Recycling Operation 12,860 12,860 320 0 0 12,860 Operating Expenses - Millar Rd Transfer Station 7,861 7,861 0 0 0 7,861 Operating Expenses - Waste Education Centre 4,128 4,128 1,812 0 0 4,128 Employee Costs - Direct PWO Building Mtce 293,504 293,504 73,848 0 0 293,504 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Building Mtce 1,190,256 1,190,256 285,506 0 0 1,190,256 Operating Expenses - PWO Building Mtce 204,329 204,329 70,278 0 0 204,329 Operating Expenses - Bush Fire Brigades 112 112 0 0 0 112 Operating Expenses - Bus Shelters 46,757 46,757 318 0 0 46,757 Operating Expenses - Jetties & Boat Ramps 131,309 131,309 22,056 0 0 131,309 Road Maintenance - Verge Mtce (Parks Emp) 0 0 1,429 0 0 0 Reserve Maintenance - Public Access Ways 16,221 16,221 2,792 0 0 16,221 Foreshore Maintenance - Rockingham 902,019 902,019 75,885 (7,999) 0 894,020 Foreshore Maintenance - Shoalwater 230,066 230,066 19,992 0 0 230,066 Foreshore Maintenance - Safety Bay 100,175 100,175 4,714 (12,732) 0 87,443 Foreshore Maintenance - Waikiki 184,023 184,023 16,653 0 0 184,023 Foreshore Maintenance - Warnbro 32,467 32,467 4,119 0 0 32,467 Foreshore Maintenance - Port Kennedy 66,679 66,679 6,180 0 0 66,679 Foreshore Maintenance - Secret Harbour 73,137 73,137 10,046 0 0 73,137 Foreshore Maintenance - Golden Bay 98,045 98,045 6,659 0 0 98,045 Foreshore Maintenance - Singleton 51,199 51,199 6,854 0 0 51,199 Foreshore Maintenance - Point Perron 52,838 52,838 14,100 0 0 52,838 Road Maintenance - Street Lighting 3,300,000 3,300,000 283,685 0 0 3,300,000 Road Maintenance - Arterial Lighting 292,436 292,436 0 120,000 0 412,436 Operating Expenses - Secret Harbour Surf Life Savi 96,000 96,000 21,342 0 0 96,000 Operating Expenses - Compliance & Emergency Liaiso 89,281 89,281 3,849 0 0 89,281 Employee Costs - Admin OH Asset Services 466,050 466,050 134,891 0 0 466,050 Operating Expenses - Admin OH Asset Services 117,950 117,950 9,397 0 0 117,950
Page 15 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Asset Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Operating Projects - Admin OH Asset Services 230,000 230,000 0 0 0 230,000 Non Cash Expenses - Admin OH Assets Services 433,590 433,590 0 0 0 433,590 Road Maintenance - Lighting Inspections 69,642 69,642 4,291 0 0 69,642 Road Maintenance - Decorative Street Lighting 613,900 613,900 108,533 (16,000) 0 597,900 Operating Expenses - Community Support Services 9,168 9,168 2,054 0 0 9,168 Income Operating Revenue - Maternal & Infant Health (900) (900) 0 0 0 (900) Grand Total 16,374,311 16,374,311 2,285,922 196,578 (8,793) 16,562,096
Page 16 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Engineering Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Engineering Services 21,536,682 21,536,682 712,915 (1,075,071) 2,309,544 22,771,155 Capital Expense Drainage - Drainage renewals at various locations 649,290 649,290 0 (649,290) 0 0 Road - Port Kennedy Drive (Stage 1) - upgrade 80,440 80,440 21,879 (751,867) 693,427 22,000 Drainage - Drainage upgrades Various Locations 599,344 0 0 0 0 0 Misc. Infra - Point Peron Boat launching facility 0 0 (0) 0 4,000 4,000 Footpath - Minor Missing Links - Various Locations 29,967 29,967 1,992 0 0 29,967 Roads - Parkin St (S'Bay to Patterson) Channelisat 26,143 26,143 3,913 (23,159) 931 3,915 Roads - Eighty Rd (Numbat to Safety Bay) Upgrade/w 100,550 100,550 207,924 162,240 96,972 359,762 Roads - Guarded School Crossings 39,957 0 0 0 0 0 Motor Vehicle- Community Safety & Support Services 58,000 58,000 0 677 0 58,677 Plant- Cat Forklift 31,000 31,000 30,989 (11) 0 30,989 Plant- Hako Sweeper 0 0 340,042 (7,958) 348,000 340,042 Plant- Hardie Skid Mounted Sprayer 0 0 14,000 0 14,000 14,000 Roads - Safety Bay Rd Stage 1 Pedestrian Islands 20,110 20,110 5,667 181 72,479 92,770 Plant- Plant Trailer (Sweeper) 0 0 39,500 (500) 40,000 39,500 Roads - Road Safety Projects - Various 0 0 0 0 51,799 51,799 Plant- Small Loader 70,000 70,000 0 0 (62,750) 7,250 Build - Bus Stops/Shelters 29,707 0 0 0 0 0 Plant- Squat Pack Sprayer 0 0 0 (5,000) 22,000 17,000 Roads - Parking Upgrade various 99,890 0 0 0 0 0 Drainage - Samuel St/Harrison/Chalwell St Upgrade 75,000 75,000 36,565 (100,000) 137,866 112,866 Drainage - Ridge Reserve upgrade 0 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 Drainage -Read St Gnangara Dr Upgrade 60,330 60,330 27,938 (5,000) 45,506 100,836 Misc Infra Mersey Point Seawall design and constru 861,324 861,324 0 25,000 10,680 897,004 Road -Eighty Rd Oak Way Nth - Nairn Dve Kerb/Drain 100,550 100,550 68,185 0 114,894 215,444 Footpath - Ennis Ave WABN Project Design Rock stn 399,564 399,564 0 0 0 399,564 Footpath - Lake Richmond South red asphalt path 25,138 25,138 159,473 0 162,152 187,290 Footpath - Pjects from Accessibility Audit 92,014 92,014 0 0 0 92,014 Misc Infra - Port Kennedy Boat Ramp Holding Jetty 89,582 89,582 116,378 8,035 217,600 315,217 Misc Infra-PointPeron Spur Groyne extension Design 101,679 101,679 20,694 12,667 6,257 120,603 Motor Vehicle- Dual Cab Utility 4x4 Deniese 0 0 0 0 0 0 Motor Vehicle- Dual Cab Utlility 4x4 Landfill Pool 0 0 35,953 953 35,000 35,953 Plant- Isuzu Water Truck 0 0 1,385 (1,274) 190,000 188,726 Plant- Peruzzo Triflex Gang Mower 0 0 52,000 0 52,100 52,100 Plant- Peruzo Tiger Verti Cutter 0 0 25,000 0 25,000 25,000 Plant- Mercedes Jetting Vac Truck 470,000 470,000 0 0 0 470,000 Road - Road Renewals Resurfacing 18/19 0 0 4,066 0 0 0 Misc Infra-Feasible/Design additional boat ramp Pk 53,137 53,137 24,438 0 4,184 57,321 Plant- 3 Tonne Tipper Truck ( 3 Way) 79,000 79,000 0 (570) 0 78,430 Plant- Hako Sweeper Citymaster 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Road - Gnangara Rd Traffic Treatments Design - Ful 0 0 10,194 0 0 0 Road - Warnbro Sound Av Safety B to The Avenue Mai 0 0 8,910 0 9,000 9,000 Computer - Compliance & Emergency Liaison 0 0 12,622 0 0 0 Roads - Royal Palm Dr Street Lights 13,072 13,072 0 134,928 (1,553) 146,447 Footpath - Concordia Way Henry St to Feorgette 0 0 9,529 160 10,000 10,160 Motor Vehicle - Toyota Hiace 12 Seater Bus 0 0 0 677 0 677 Misc Infra - Construct Limestone Seawall Mersey Pt 1,343,042 1,343,042 8,330 (443,042) 0 900,000 Motor Vehicle Director Legal Services 42,000 42,000 0 0 0 42,000 Motor Vehicle Manager Library Services 34,000 34,000 0 (3,429) 0 30,571 Motor Vehicle Manager Community Infrastructure Pla 34,000 34,000 0 (34,000) 0 0 Motor Vehicle Enviromental Heath Officer 24,000 24,000 19,301 (4,699) 0 19,301 Motor Vehicle Assets Project Supervisor 24,000 24,000 0 0 0 24,000 Motor Vehicle Smartwatch Officer 156,000 156,000 0 (3,688) 0 152,312 Motor Vehicle Number Plate Reconition Vehicle 26,000 26,000 0 0 0 26,000 Motor Vehicle Dual Cab Utlity 4x2 64,000 64,000 30,495 (1,505) 0 62,495 Motor Vehicle Space Cab Utility 4x4 138,000 138,000 0 6,346 0 144,346 Motor Vehicle Dual Cab Utility 4x4 160,000 160,000 0 (1,319) 0 158,681 Plant IsuzuFVZ 1400 Hook Lift Truck Millar Road 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 Plant Vermeer Wood Chipper 130,000 130,000 0 0 0 130,000 Plant Hino Two Way Tipper With Crane 98,000 98,000 0 0 0 98,000 Plant Massey Ferguson Tractor 95,000 95,000 0 0 0 95,000 Plant Toro 4700 Rotary Gang Mower 86,000 86,000 0 0 0 86,000 Plant Kubota Mower 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Plant Kubota Mower Rear Discharge 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 Plant Tandem Plant Trailer 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 15,000 Plant Tandem Box Trailer 22,500 22,500 0 0 0 22,500 Plant Scarifier 26,500 26,500 0 0 0 26,500 Plant Tipper Truck Hino 921 330,000 330,000 0 0 0 330,000 Plant Tipper Truck Fuso Canter 815 110,000 110,000 0 0 0 110,000 Plant Isuzu 6 Wheel Water Truck 220,000 220,000 0 18,370 0 238,370 Plant Hino 300 Tipper ( Crane) 90,000 90,000 0 0 0 90,000 Plant Unimec Pedestrian Roller 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Plant Graco Airless Sprayer 9,500 9,500 0 0 0 9,500 Plant Jetwave Pressure Cleaner 26,500 26,500 0 0 0 26,500 Plant Concrete Grinder 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Roads - Road Renewals Resurfacing 20/21 0 0 0 48,513 0 48,513 Park - Georgetown Car Park kerbing and resurface 41,190 41,190 0 0 0 41,190 Park - Rockingham Beach Rd street parking bays 149,836 149,836 0 (149,836) 0 0 Road-Gnangara Road traffic treatments construction 799,126 799,126 0 0 0 799,126 Road-Parkin/Safety Bay/Pt. Peron/Hymus Design inte 49,945 49,945 0 0 0 49,945 Road - Road Safety Projects - Various 99,890 99,890 68,239 54,900 0 154,790 Drainage - Upgrades Various Locations 20/21 0 599,344 0 649,290 0 1,248,634 Road - Guarded School Crossings 20/21 0 39,957 0 0 0 39,957 Misc Infra - Point Peron Boat Car Park Expansion 1,400,000 1,400,000 14,464 0 0 1,400,000 Misc Infra -Design Point Peron Seabed Dredging Det 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Road-Haines Rd resurface Doghill Rd/Telephone Lane 60,479 60,479 0 0 0 60,479 Road -Hefron St resurface Council Ave/ Bradbury St 90,411 90,411 2,307 0 0 90,411 Road - Huntingdale Court resurface Waterloo Rd 11,856 11,856 0 0 0 11,856 Road-Pardoo Pl resurfae Tangadee Rd to Coolawanyah 57,010 57,010 1,285 0 0 57,010 Road-Royal Palm Dr resurface Halliburton Ave/Ennis 73,010 73,010 0 0 0 73,010 Road -Mandurah Rd resurface Kerosene Lane/Fifty Rd 469,913 469,913 0 0 0 469,913 Road - St Clair Pl resurface Cuthbertson Dr 30,365 30,365 1,069 0 0 30,365 Road - Dixon Rd resurface Dowling St to Goddard St 190,034 190,034 0 0 0 190,034 Road - Waterloo Rd resurface Gleneagles Loop 23,856 23,856 0 0 0 23,856 Road -Swifts Court resurface Hennessy Way/Woodwind 29,725 29,725 0 0 0 29,725 Road-Coolawanyah St resurface Tangadee Rd/Aurea Bl 66,672 66,672 1,096 0 0 66,672 Road - Eagle Mews resurface Gleneagles Loop 9,832 9,832 0 0 0 9,832 Road - Read St resurface Swinstone St/Centaurus St 77,238 77,238 4,532 0 0 77,238 Road - Redbud Mews resurface Cuthbertson Dr 9,904 9,904 2,788 0 0 9,904 Road-La Spezia Dr resurface S Harbour Blvd/Maratea 51,557 51,557 0 0 0 51,557 Road-Latiano Green rd resurface Pesaro Green/Genoa 17,778 17,778 0 0 0 17,778 Road - Farris St rd resurface Read St / Ledgard St 73,996 73,996 19,038 0 0 73,996 Road - Hurrell Way resurface Islip St/Morgan St 95,089 95,089 7,021 0 0 95,089 Road-Morgan St road resurface Rogers St to Hurrell 79,102 79,102 0 0 0 79,102 Road Naples Pl rd resurface La Spezia Dr/Salerno 17,778 17,778 0 0 0 17,778 Road-Camargue Green rd resurface Livorno Gardens 22,519 22,519 0 0 0 22,519 Road -Birkdale Court rd resurface Cuthbertson Dr 42,099 42,099 0 0 0 42,099 Road - Gleneagles Loop resurface road St Andrews 47,965 47,965 0 0 0 47,965 Road - Gnangara Dr rd resurface Read St to Oakwood 148,162 148,162 1,807 0 0 148,162 Road-Cessnock Way rd resurface Patterson Rd/Commo 72,962 72,962 7,831 0 0 72,962 Footpath-S Bay Rd renewal the Avenue to Warnbro So 30,493 30,493 0 0 0 30,493 Road -Mundijong Rd Realign/Install street lighting 995,911 995,911 50,268 0 0 995,911 Road - Mandurah Rd upgrade state blackspot project 1,311,161 1,311,161 14,209 0 0 1,311,161 Road - Parkin St/Bay View St new roundabout 244,733 244,733 110,334 0 0 244,733 Road-Karnup Rd/Young Rd widen rplc safety barrier 472,483 472,483 0 0 0 472,483
Page 17 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Engineering Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Road-Read St Chalgrove Ave/Centaurus St & Patterso 49,945 49,945 0 0 0 49,945 Road - Read St Chalgrove Ave to Council Ave Design 119,749 119,749 0 (119,749) 0 0 Road-Royal Palm Dr Coronata Dr-Ennis Ave St lights 149,836 149,836 0 (149,836) 0 0 Road - Dixon Rd MRRG rehab Ennis Ave to Arkwright 429,231 429,231 0 0 0 429,231 Road - Read St MRRG Rd rehab Rae Rd to Council Ave 267,208 267,208 0 0 0 267,208 Road-Grange Dr MRRG Rd rehab Gascoyne to Willmott 273,301 273,301 1,263 0 0 273,301 Road - Sixty Eight Rd MRRG Road rehab to Wandoo Dr 291,581 291,581 1,019 0 0 291,581 Footpath - Bakewell Dr path Warnbro Sound Ave 44,951 44,951 0 0 0 44,951 Footpath -Exeter St path Salcombe Way to Axminster 41,954 41,954 0 0 0 41,954 Footpath -Griggs Way path Bell St to Safety Bay Rd 59,935 59,935 0 0 0 59,935 Furn - Engineering Services surveying equipment 19,978 19,978 0 0 0 19,978 Park - Governor Road Car Park 70,324 70,324 0 0 0 70,324 Build - Bus Stops/Shelters 20/21 0 29,707 0 0 0 29,707 Footpath-Yuin St new path Dampier Dr - Tangadee dr 19,978 19,978 0 0 0 19,978 Footpath-Central Prom path Contest Parade to Ameer 24,973 24,973 0 0 0 24,973 Road Read St MRRG Road rehab Willmont Dr to Malibu 136,151 136,151 0 0 0 136,151 Road - Read St/Rae Rd extend right turn pocket NB 362,603 362,603 9,425 0 0 362,603 Footpath- S Bay Rd renew Ennis Ave to The Avenue 40,215 40,215 0 0 0 40,215 Motor Vehicle Manager Customer & Corporate Support 34,000 34,000 0 (2,510) 0 31,490 Motor Vehicle Building Services Compliance Officer 24,000 24,000 0 0 0 24,000 Motor Vehicle New Utility Asset Services 45,000 45,000 0 0 0 45,000 Plant Hino Two Way Tipper 88,000 88,000 0 0 0 88,000 Plant Gianni Ferrari Mower 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 Plant Toro Workman 26,000 26,000 0 (6,200) 0 19,800 Plant Tandem Trailer Drain Cleaner 17,000 17,000 0 0 0 17,000 Plant Compressor AMT55 7,500 7,500 0 0 0 7,500 Road - Golf Place road resurface Birkdale Curt 22,412 22,412 0 0 0 22,412 Road-Livorno Garden rd resurface La Spezia Dr/Sete 6,519 6,519 0 0 0 6,519 Road - Deanna Court resurface Cuthbertson Dr 20,967 20,967 669 0 0 20,967 Road - Commodore Dr resurface Read st to Cessnock 70,260 70,260 6,846 0 0 70,260 Road -S Bay Rd renew shared path Ennis Ave/The Ave 40,445 40,445 0 (40,445) 0 0 Road - Parking Upgrade various 20/21 0 99,890 0 0 0 99,890 Road - Mersey Point car park upgrade to include PT 149,836 149,836 417 0 0 149,836 Road - Baldivis Rd Furioso Green to Highbury Blvd 251,725 251,725 36,905 0 0 251,725 Road -Safety Bay Rd/Nairn Dr Install predeflection 507,495 507,495 0 0 0 507,495 Plant 400 Litre Quickspray 17,500 17,500 0 0 0 17,500 Plant Patching Truck Isuzu FSR700 250,000 250,000 0 19,990 0 269,990 Build - Penguin Rd replace bus shelter roof 6,932 6,932 0 0 0 6,932 Road-Burma Rd resurface Doghill Rd to Wilkinson Rd 60,210 60,210 0 (60,210) 0 0 Road - Millar Rd resurface Landfill to Baldivis Rd 429,964 429,964 0 0 0 429,964 Road - Benjamin Way rd resurface to Read st 58,550 58,550 18,044 0 0 58,550 Road -Powell Rd resurface Doghill Rd/Serpentine Rd 47,393 47,393 0 0 0 47,393 Road-Pesaro Green resurface La Spezia Dr/Latiano 11,260 11,260 0 0 0 11,260 Misc Infra - Palm Beach Jetty 10 year Refurb scope 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Road - City Centre brick paving works 45,115 45,115 22,577 40,000 0 85,115 Motor Vehicle Coordinator Health Services 24,000 24,000 18,514 (5,486) 0 18,514 Motor Vehicle Coordinator Sustainability and Envir 24,000 24,000 18,514 (5,486) 0 18,514 Plant High Pressure Cleaner Waste Services 7,000 7,000 4,895 (2,105) 0 4,895 Plant Toro 7000 Reel Gang Mower 85,000 85,000 0 0 0 85,000 Plant MEY Self Propelled Broom 6,500 6,500 0 0 0 6,500 Road - Ambrose St road resurfacing Dixon Road 100,138 100,138 0 0 0 100,138 Road - Rogers St resurface Dixon Rd to Morgan St 20,196 20,196 1,340 0 0 20,196 Road - Egret Mews resurface Gleneagles Loop 9,398 9,398 0 0 0 9,398 Road - Cuthbertson Dr resurface Elanora Dr 207,863 207,863 24,346 0 0 207,863 Road - Hillview Rise resurface Cuthbertson Dr 39,909 39,909 1,798 0 0 39,909 Road -Traffic treat Read St Chagrove Centurus SBS 0 0 0 339,000 0 339,000 Road -Traffic treat Read St Council Ave Cygnus SBS 0 0 0 559,000 0 559,000 Roads - Foreshore Drive Connection to proposed sub 0 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 Roads - roundabout resurfacing Baldivis to Highbur 0 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 Plant - Trailer Side Cabinets Fitted Storage BDSC 0 0 0 16,000 0 16,000 Plant - Broad Acre Mower Toro 4000 BDSC 0 0 0 80,000 0 80,000 Plant - Utility Buggy Toro MDX BDSC 0 0 0 24,500 0 24,500 Roads - Roundabout resurfacing Baldivis to Makybe 0 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 Plant - Turf Cricket Wicket Roller BDSC 0 0 0 35,000 0 35,000 Plant - Tipper Truck Dual Cab BDSC 0 0 0 80,000 0 80,000 Plant - Air-actuated Pumping System 0 0 0 110,000 0 110,000 Plant - NORM Monitoring Equipment 0 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 Income Proceeds on Sale of Assets - Larkhill Complex (24,000) (24,000) (1,948) 0 0 (24,000) Proceeds on Sale of Assets - Millar Road Landfill (300,200) (300,200) (3,046) 0 0 (300,200) Proceeds Sale of Assets - Plant Operating Costs (571,900) (571,900) (102,227) 0 0 (571,900) Proceeds on Sale of Assets-Legal Services & Counse (13,000) (13,000) 0 0 0 (13,000) Proceeds on Sale of Assets - Community Services Ad (31,000) (31,000) 0 0 0 (31,000) Proceeds on Sale of Assets- Litter Team (Busters) (5,000) (5,000) 0 0 0 (5,000) Proceeds Sale of Assets - Animal Control/Ranger (70,500) (70,500) 0 0 0 (70,500) Proceeds Sale of Assets - Community Safety (37,000) (37,000) (19,905) 0 0 (37,000) Proceeds Sale of Assets - Health Services (16,000) (16,000) (21,173) 0 0 (16,000) Proceeds Sale of Assets-Sanitation & Waste Service (172,000) (172,000) (168,198) (8,198) 0 (180,198) Proceeds Sale of Assets – Land & Development Inf (15,000) (15,000) 0 0 0 (15,000) Proceeds Sale of Assets - Building Services (5,500) (5,500) 0 0 0 (5,500) Proceeds Sale of Assets - Rec & Culture Parks Serv (22,000) (22,000) (17,405) 0 0 (22,000) Proceeds Sale of Assets - Transport Engineering Se (25,000) (25,000) (16,274) 0 0 (25,000) Proceeds Sale of Assets - Bush Fire Control (14,000) (14,000) 0 0 0 (14,000) Proceeds on Sale of Assets- Strategy Co-ordination (11,000) (11,000) (22,178) 0 0 (11,000) Proceeds on Sale of Asset - Customer & Corpor/Supt (11,000) (11,000) 0 0 0 (11,000) Proceeds on Sale of Assets - Statutory Planning (12,000) (12,000) 0 0 0 (12,000) Proceeds on Sale of Assets- Library Services Admin (11,000) (11,000) 0 0 0 (11,000) Operating Expense Non Cash Expenses - Building Services 1,339 1,339 0 0 0 1,339 Non Cash Expenses - Community Safety (11,318) (11,318) 0 0 0 (11,318) Non Cash Expenses - Community Services Admin (29,626) (29,626) 0 0 0 (29,626) Non Cash Expenses - Health Services (3,764) (3,764) 0 0 0 (3,764) Non Cash Expenses - Millar Road Landfill Operation (1,621,655) (1,621,655) 0 0 0 (1,621,655) Non Cash Expenses - Plant Operation Costs (7,478,673) (7,478,673) (1,389,437) 21,591 0 (7,457,082) Non Cash Expenses - Sanitation & Waste Services 118,180 118,180 0 0 0 118,180 Non Cash Expenses - Statutory Planning (2,731) (2,731) 0 0 0 (2,731) Non Cash Expenses - Strategy and Corporate Communi 2,343 2,343 0 0 0 2,343 Non Cash Expenses- Animal Ctrl/Rangers General (43,884) (43,884) 0 0 0 (43,884) Operating Expenses - Foreshores & Beaches 47,736 47,736 6,586 0 0 47,736 Operating Expenses - Litter Team Operations 375,693 375,693 79,119 14,500 0 390,193 Operating Expenses - Plant Operation Costs 3,611,448 3,611,448 716,629 0 0 3,611,448 Operating Expenses - Rapid Response Amenity Team 1,313,235 1,313,235 200,129 238,857 0 1,552,092 Operating Expenses - Strategic Planning & Environm 245,541 245,541 57,625 0 0 245,541 Non Cash Expenses - Strategic Planning & Enviromen (3,439) (3,439) 0 0 0 (3,439) Non Cash Expenses - Larkhill Complex (8,023) (8,023) 0 0 0 (8,023) Non Cash Expenses - Legal Services & General Couns 10,241 10,241 0 0 0 10,241 Employee Costs - Admin OH Engineering Services 551,800 551,800 142,082 0 0 551,800 Operating Expenses - Admin OH Engineering Services 634,118 634,118 76,575 (10,252) 0 623,866 Employee Costs - Direct PWO Road Construction 144,644 144,644 25,002 0 0 144,644 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Road Construction 137,371 137,371 59,443 115,503 0 252,874 Operating Expenses - PWO Road Construction 36,054 36,054 5,285 (25,000) 0 11,054 Employee Costs - Direct PWO Road Maintenance 306,131 306,131 106,205 8,000 0 314,131 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Road Maintenance 337,781 337,781 91,771 0 0 337,781 Operating Expenses - PWO Road Maintenance 52,028 52,028 9,862 (10,000) 0 42,028 Employee Costs - Coastal infrastructure 126,549 126,549 44,449 1,500 0 128,049 Operating Expenses - Coastal infrastructure 220,474 220,474 7,071 12,774 0 233,248
Page 18 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Engineering Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Employee Costs - Transport Engineering Services 929,819 929,819 186,811 (117,003) 0 812,816 Operating Expenses - Transport Engineering Service 55,002 55,002 17,636 85,000 0 140,002 Operating Projects - Transport Engineering Service 0 0 0 12,000 0 12,000 Operating Projects - Rec & Culture Parks Services 0 0 0 12,500 0 12,500 Employee Costs - Depot/ Stores 171,521 171,521 56,787 0 0 171,521 Operating Expenses - Depot/ Stores 0 0 4 0 0 0 Non Cash Expenses - Customer & Corporate Support 3,649 3,649 0 0 0 3,649 Operating Expenses - Jetties & Boat Ramps 1,199,000 1,199,000 107,771 512,533 0 1,711,533 Non Cash Expenses - Libraries Services Admin 3,560 3,560 0 0 0 3,560 Road Maintenance - Street Sweeping 1,169,022 1,169,022 226,258 (80,000) 0 1,089,022 Road Maintenance - Concrete Repairs(Fpaths/Kerbs) 1,422,199 1,422,199 213,862 (81,584) 0 1,340,615 Road Maintenance - Pavement Mtce - Local Roads 1,732,285 1,732,285 246,803 (30,799) 0 1,701,486 Non Cash Expenses - Admin OH Engineering Services 116,969 116,969 0 0 0 116,969 Non Cash Expenses - Depot/ Stores (10,602) (10,602) 0 0 0 (10,602) Employee Costs - Plant Operations (Fleet) 406,809 406,809 107,185 0 0 406,809 Employee Costs - Litter Team (Busters) 648,905 648,905 178,183 8,000 0 656,905 Non Cash Expenses - Litter Team (Busters) 72,721 72,721 0 0 0 72,721 Operating Expenses - Admin Plant Operations Fleet 151,504 151,504 59,896 40,000 0 191,504 Road Maintenance - Litter Control 158,857 158,857 1,934 (158,857) 0 0 Drainage Maintenance - Expenses 1,516,456 1,516,456 296,680 (99,300) 0 1,417,156 Operating Projects - Coastal infrastructure 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Income Operating Revenue - Foreshores & Beaches (1,000) (1,000) (437) 0 0 (1,000) Operating Revenue - Plant Operation Costs (254,000) (254,000) (38,994) 0 0 (254,000) Operating Revenue - Recreation Grounds 0 0 (1,182) 0 0 0 Operating Revenue - Bus Shelters (10,000) (10,000) 0 0 0 (10,000) Operating Revenue - Streets, Rds, Bridges-Construc (5,496,897) (5,496,897) (2,188,270) (637,989) 0 (6,134,886) Operating Revenue - Depot/Stores (20,000) (20,000) 0 0 0 (20,000) Operating Revenue - Jetties & Boat Ramps (930,000) (930,000) 0 0 0 (930,000) Operating Revenue - Rapid Response & Litter Team (8,500) (8,500) (721) 0 0 (8,500) Operating Revenue - Protection of Environment 0 0 (433,550) (867,100) 0 (867,100) Grand Total 21,536,682 21,536,682 712,915 (1,075,071) 2,309,544 22,771,155
Page 19 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Parks Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Parks Services 27,161,500 27,161,500 4,683,289 71,783 (319,935) 26,913,348 Capital Expense Parks- Infrast Parks (WO) - Recreation Grounds 48,000 48,000 0 0 0 48,000 Parks - Parks Infrastructure upgrades 166,347 166,347 0 0 33,097 199,444 Parks - Bayview Res replace aged combination unit 25,809 25,809 0 0 0 25,809 Build - Arts Centre Courtyard Shade Sails 20,506 20,506 0 0 0 20,506 Parks - Irrigation Replacement - Upgrades/renewal 0 0 216 0 12,450 12,450 Misc Infra - F'hore Strategy Beach amenity & fence 0 0 0 0 41,149 41,149 Parks - New Playgrounds 29,548 29,548 0 0 0 29,548 Parks - Bayview Res replace laterite basketball co 20,506 20,506 0 0 0 20,506 Parks - Passive Reserve Development New POS Develo 165,001 165,001 19,404 11,872 23,689 200,562 Parks - Environmental Re Natural Area infrastructu 0 0 2,556 0 15,200 15,200 Footpath - San Javier Limestone Path 0 0 23,003 0 23,000 23,000 Park -Hourglass Res maintain batting cages 41,478 41,478 0 0 0 41,478 Park - Careeba Pk Res R33299 infield reticu 40,414 40,414 0 154,348 (194,762) 0 Park - Shoalwater oval res R24280 infield retic 62,548 62,548 0 (67,381) 4,833 0 Park - Nettleton Way Res R33955 infield retic 64,240 64,240 0 5,510 (69,750) 0 Park - Governor Reserve R22618 infield reticu 63,183 63,183 23,745 0 0 63,183 Park -Malibu D Res R35083 (Santiago) infield retic 19,231 19,231 0 (300) 0 18,931 Park - Solquest Way Reserve R34856 infield reticu 24,038 24,038 0 (1,500) 0 22,538 Park - Malibu A Res R34697 (Montego) infield retic 19,231 19,231 17,029 (3,131) 0 16,100 Park - Gabyon Park Res R39625 infield retic 22,134 22,134 17,949 (5,000) 0 17,134 Park - Fred Gardiner ResR32216 (Catalina) retic 43,897 43,897 29,050 (13,000) 0 30,897 Park - Dimantina Reserve R40443 infield reticu 8,414 8,414 0 0 0 8,414 Park - George Foster Reserve R29466 infield retic 22,134 22,134 0 1,800 0 23,934 Off Leash Dog Exercise Area Seahaven Reserve 125,308 125,308 7,209 0 13,271 138,579 Park-Kent street - Irrigation and surrounds 31,731 31,731 0 0 20,000 51,731 Footpath - Stakehill Swamp Limestone Path 21,154 21,154 0 0 (13,857) 7,297 Park - North Road Reserve R25119 infield retic 46,174 46,174 0 (22,750) 0 23,424 Park - Seabrooke/Barron Res R35060 infield retic 22,134 22,134 21,200 0 0 22,134 Park - John Butts Reserve R26215 infield retic 22,134 22,134 0 (900) 0 21,234 Park -Malibu B Res R34700 (Tobago) infield retic 59,692 59,692 0 (33,111) 7,732 34,313 Park - Esplanade Foreshore R21487 infield retic 39,166 39,166 99,293 60,130 0 99,296 Park - Tarwarri Park Reserve 35906 infield retic 22,134 22,134 0 (3,700) 0 18,434 Park - Malibu C Res R35208 St Lucia infield retic 28,847 28,847 0 6,544 0 35,391 Park - Torcross Reserve R34357 infield reticu 46,174 46,174 45,862 (2,800) 0 43,374 Park - Derwent Park R40984 infield reticulation 7,211 7,211 0 0 0 7,211 Park - AxminsterRes R29000 infield retic 22,134 22,134 0 (4,700) 0 17,434 Parks - Lark Hill Environmental Plant Supply for R 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Parks - Dixon Road Conservation Precinct Plant Sup 0 0 (0) 0 0 0 Parks - Tramway 4x4 Concrete Path 82,806 82,806 0 0 (57,018) 25,788 Misc Infra - Tramway Gate 6,894 6,894 1,098 0 (1,153) 5,741 Parks - Warnbro Foreshore 4x4 Limestone Access Tra 37,072 37,072 0 0 0 37,072 Parks - Veterans Respite 4x4 Mineral Earth Fire Br 5,587 5,587 0 0 0 5,587 Roads - Ukick 4x4 Mineral Earth Fire Break 9,751 9,751 0 31 (9,782) 0 Parks - Tramway Karnup Nature Reserve 4x4 Limeston 2,024 2,024 0 10,189 (12,213) 0 Parks - Mandurah Rd Conservation 4x4 Mineral Earth 7,092 7,092 0 0 0 7,092 Roads - Nairn Road Reserve 4x4 Mineral Earth Fireb 232,932 232,932 45,370 0 (205,592) 27,340 Parks - Tamworth Reserve 4x4 Concrete Path 17,857 17,857 0 0 2,331 20,188 Drainage - Arterial Road/Entry Statements Stscapes 57,460 57,460 0 0 0 57,460 Park- Tuart Pk replace bbq 47464-58884 & hardstard 19,107 19,107 16,721 0 0 19,107 Park - City Pk replace seventeen age park bench se 37,271 37,271 0 0 0 37,271 Park - City Pk replace 3 aged timber table & stand 17,474 17,474 0 0 0 17,474 Park - City Pk replace ten aged bin surrounds 26,593 26,593 0 0 0 26,593 Park - S Bay Tennis Club replace 4 Picnic settings 54,067 54,067 0 0 0 54,067 Misc Infra- Barri Barri Res rple comb unit 188736 30,533 30,533 0 0 0 30,533 Misc Infra- Bayeux Res rplce swing 61053 companion 14,774 14,774 0 0 0 14,774 Misc Infra- Brixham Way Res rplc comb unit 43847 22,653 22,653 0 0 0 22,653 Misc Infra-Churchill Pk rplc small comb unit 55692 27,577 27,577 0 0 0 27,577 Misc Infra- Emerald Pk Res rplc comb unit 55122 60,079 60,079 0 0 0 60,079 Misc Infra- Galway Garden rplc comb unit 117546 24,623 24,623 0 0 0 24,623 Misc Infra- Governor Road Res rplc comb unit 55653 53,185 53,185 0 0 0 53,185 Misc Infra- Hayeswater Res rplc spider net 65309 39,396 39,396 0 0 0 39,396 Misc Infra- June Rd Res rplc swing 55658 companion 14,774 14,774 0 0 0 14,774 Misc Infra- Len Pike Res rplc comb unit 45695 31,517 31,517 0 0 0 31,517 Misc Infra- Phoebe Hymus rplc unit55708 swing17373 61,064 61,064 0 0 0 61,064 Misc Infra- Rhonda Scarrott Res rplce comb 56778 26,593 26,593 0 0 0 26,593 Misc Infra- Three Bears Loop Res rplce comb 66051 33,487 33,487 0 0 0 33,487 Park - Bayeux Res rplc aged rubber softfall 122710 7,780 7,780 0 0 0 7,780 Park - Carnarvon Res rplc rubber softfall 177981 20,683 20,683 0 0 0 20,683 Park - June Rd Res rplc rubber softfall 123060. 8,175 8,175 0 0 0 8,175 Park - Rhonda Scarrott Res rplc aged softfall 16,743 16,743 0 0 0 16,743 Park-Emerald Pk rplce shower 61527 & drink f 61518 10,096 10,096 6,787 0 0 10,096 Park - Charles Bailey Garden Infield Reticulation 49,245 49,245 1,587 0 0 49,245 Park - Turner St Res R26343 Infield Reticulation 19,698 19,698 1,587 0 0 19,698 Park - Bell Pk R22568 Infield Reticulation 54,170 54,170 0 (54,170) 0 0 Park - Churchill Pk R22568 Infield Reticulation 54,170 54,170 0 (54,170) 0 0 Park - Waramunga Res R41196 Infield Reticulation 29,546 29,546 1,587 0 0 29,546 Park - Benjamin Way R 39545 Infield Reticulation 24,624 24,624 1,587 0 0 24,624 Park - Irrigation Nairn Dr - Bramwell to Ridge Blv 49,245 49,245 0 0 0 49,245 Park - Central Irrigation Mannag Control Kybra Mew 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Park - Central Irrigation Manage Control Salamanca 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Park - Central Irrigation Manage Control Madiera 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Parks - Fshore Strategy Upgrade poor beach path 6,402 6,402 0 0 0 6,402 Misc Infra - Foreshore Strategy Weed control 6,894 6,894 0 0 0 6,894 Park -Environmental Res Manage Plans Upgrade fence 14,774 14,774 0 0 0 14,774 Park - Environmental Res Manage Plans lime tracks 19,699 19,699 0 0 0 19,699 Park - Environmental Res Manage Plans Revegetation 19,699 19,699 0 0 0 19,699 Park - Environmental Res Manage Plans Interp signs 14,774 14,774 0 0 0 14,774 Park-Environmental Res Manage Plan Tramworth Swam 167,436 167,436 0 0 0 167,436 Park -Sport Reserve Floodlights New Georgetown Res 246,228 246,228 0 0 0 246,228 Park - Ceri Close Reserve - Renew irrigation contr 4,925 4,925 4,398 0 0 4,925 Park - Warnbro Foreshore - Renew irrigation contro 7,747 7,747 6,447 0 0 7,747 Park - Majestic Close Reserve - Renew irrigation c 4,925 4,925 4,398 0 0 4,925 Park - Solquest Way Reserve - Renew irrigation cab 7,879 7,879 0 (7,879) 0 0 Park - Alf Powell Reserve - Renew irrigation cabin 9,849 9,849 0 (9,849) 0 0 Park - Seabrooke Reserve - Renew irrigation contro 7,747 7,747 15,094 0 0 7,747 Park - Charnley Reserve - Renew irrigation control 7,747 7,747 0 0 0 7,747 Park - Warnbro Foreshore - Renew irrigation cubicl 11,819 11,819 0 0 0 11,819 Park - Centenary Park - Renew irrigation cabinet 11,819 11,819 0 (11,819) 0 0 Park - Harmony Park - Renew irrigation controller 8,865 8,865 7,547 0 0 8,865 Park - Dress Circle Reserve - Renew irrigation con 7,756 7,756 7,547 0 0 7,756 Park - Bequia Reserve - Renew irrigation cabinet 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Park - Gillespie Reserve - Replace iron filter 24,623 24,623 0 0 0 24,623 Park - Centenary Park - Infield reticulation 118,190 118,190 2,221 0 0 118,190 Park - Koorana Park - Infield reticulation 108,340 108,340 0 (108,340) 0 0 Park - Secret Harbour Oval - Infield reticulation 98,492 98,492 2,221 0 0 98,492 Park - Java Park Reserve new central irrigation 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Park - Harmony Park new shade structures 16,252 16,252 0 0 0 16,252 Park - Santa Monica Reserve new shade structures 24,130 24,130 0 0 0 24,130 Park - Torbay Mews Reserve new shade structures 28,070 28,070 0 0 0 28,070 Parks - Hawker Street Reserve Infield Reticulation 0 0 2,856 50,000 0 50,000 Parks - St Raphael Infield Irrigation Replacement 0 0 2,221 250,000 0 250,000 Parks - Haselmere Circuit Reserve Infield Reticula 0 0 2,221 52,000 0 52,000 Misc Infra- Fred Gardiner Res rplc comb unit 44155 24,623 24,623 0 0 0 24,623 Misc Infra- Greeson Prkway Res rplc comb unit 5885 25,115 25,115 0 0 0 25,115
Page 20 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Parks Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Park - Barri Barri Res rplc aged rubber softfall 31,517 31,517 0 0 0 31,517 Park - Georgetown Res rplc basketball court & seat 24,622 24,622 13,504 0 0 24,622 Park - Catalpa Res rplc drinking fountain 120938 5,614 5,614 2,850 0 0 5,614 Park - Passive Reserve Development Warnbro Rec Dra 59,095 59,095 0 0 0 59,095 Park - Central Irrigation Manage Control Brixham 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Road -Arterial Entry Statement Nairn Dr & S Bay Rd 29,548 29,548 0 0 0 29,548 Misc Infra - Foreshore Strategy Upgrade poor fence 6,894 6,894 5,012 0 0 6,894 Misc Infra - Foreshore Strategy Revegetation 6,894 6,894 0 0 0 6,894 Park - Environmental Res Manage Plans Weed control 29,548 29,548 0 0 0 29,548 Park - Grange Reserve - Renew irrigation controlle 7,747 7,747 7,547 0 0 7,747 Park - Chelmsford Reserve - Renew irrigation contr 7,747 7,747 7,547 0 0 7,747 Park - Turner Street Reserve - Renew irrigation ca 7,879 7,879 0 0 0 7,879 Park - Palomino Reserve - Replace iron filter 19,699 19,699 0 0 0 19,699 Park - Parks Services BDSC Fuel pod 11,819 11,819 0 0 0 11,819 Park - City Pk replace ten aged picnic tables 49,245 49,245 0 0 0 49,245 Misc Infra- Barri Barri Res replace swing 188735 14,774 14,774 0 0 0 14,774 Misc Infra-Churchill Pk rplc large comb unit 55691 30,533 30,533 0 0 0 30,533 Misc Infra- S Bay Fshore Watts- June Rd rple 55709 33,487 33,487 0 0 0 33,487 Park - Nolin Way Res R47411 Infield Reticulation 14,774 14,774 0 0 0 14,774 Park - Environmental Res Manage Plan pedestrian ac 14,774 14,774 0 0 0 14,774 Park - Santa Monica Reserve - Renew irrigation cab 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Park - Pimento Circle Reserve - Renew irrigation c 4,925 4,925 4,398 0 0 4,925 Park - Surf Drive Reserve new shade structures 21,668 21,668 0 0 0 21,668 Park - Chelmsford Reserve new shade structures 29,055 29,055 0 0 0 29,055 Park - St Raphael replace bbq 61049 & hardstand 9,603 9,603 6,940 0 0 9,603 Parks - Dress Circle Reserve Infield Reticulation 0 0 1,587 52,000 0 52,000 Parks - Eva Lynch Infield Reticulation 0 0 2,221 40,000 0 40,000 Misc Infra- Hayswater Res rplce softfall 122745 24,623 24,623 0 0 0 24,623 Misc Infra- Madeira Res rplce comb unit 45863 24,623 24,623 0 0 0 24,623 Park - Dixon Rd Res R33805 Infield Reticulation 81,255 81,255 0 0 0 81,255 Park - Anniversary Pk R31572 Infield Reticulation 216,681 216,681 3,808 0 0 216,681 Misc Infra - Foreshore Strategy Erosion mitigation 6,402 6,402 0 0 0 6,402 Misc Infra-Foreshore Strategy Interpretive signage 5,909 5,909 0 0 0 5,909 Park - Dress Circle Reserve - Renew irrigation cub 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Park - Java Park Reserve - Renew irrigation cabine 9,849 9,849 0 0 0 9,849 Park - Haselmere Circuit Reserve - Renew irrigatio 7,879 7,879 0 0 0 7,879 Park - Rushmore Loop Reserve - Replace iron filter 19,699 19,699 0 0 0 19,699 Park - Seabrooke Reserve - Infield reticulation 24,623 24,623 3,173 (3,500) 0 21,123 Road - Enhance arterial rd & entry statements 29,548 29,548 0 0 0 29,548 Parks - Urgent works 98,492 98,492 0 0 0 98,492 Park - North Road Reserve Renew Irrigation Cabinet 0 0 0 11,819 0 11,819 Park - Lynx Way Reserve Renew Irrigation Cabinet 0 0 0 9,849 0 9,849 Round hill Reserve - Renew Irrigation Cabinet 0 0 0 7,879 0 7,879 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Aqua Jetty 31,136 31,136 9,408 0 0 31,136 Operating Expenses - Autumn Centre 22,332 22,332 1,525 0 0 22,332 Operating Expenses - Bush Fire Control 85,000 85,000 45,059 0 0 85,000 Operating Expenses - CCB Arts & Culture 11,558 11,558 0 0 0 11,558 Operating Expenses - Cemeteries 39,052 39,052 5,265 0 0 39,052 Operating Expenses - Challenger Court 23,255 23,255 909 0 0 23,255 Operating Expenses - Challenger Lodge 3,937 3,937 472 0 0 3,937 Operating Expenses - Larkhill Complex 814,520 814,520 161,782 0 0 814,520 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Rockingham 14,950 14,950 0 0 0 14,950 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Safety Bay 13,882 13,882 954 0 0 13,882 Operating Expenses - Mary Davies Library & Comm. C 0 0 590 0 0 0 Operating Expenses - Maternal & Infant Health 8,871 8,871 131 0 0 8,871 Operating Expenses - Mike Barnett 26,079 26,079 4,155 0 0 26,079 Operating Expenses - Other Governance Expenses 68,516 68,516 28,493 0 0 68,516 Operating Expenses - Pre-school 0 0 886 0 0 0 Operating Expenses - Warnbro Recreation Centre 123,611 123,611 10,149 0 0 123,611 Operating Expenses - Youth Services 16,831 16,831 462 0 0 16,831 Reserves Maintenance - Baldivis Reserves 3,450,555 3,450,555 616,929 0 0 3,450,555 Reserves Maintenance - Cooloongup Reserves 575,699 575,699 149,788 0 0 575,699 Reserves Maintenance - Golden Bay Reserves 490,461 490,461 103,181 0 0 490,461 Reserves Maintenance - Harrington Waters 184,200 184,200 18,560 0 0 184,200 Reserves Maintenance - Hillman Reserves 93,411 93,411 19,222 0 0 93,411 Reserves Maintenance - Port Kennedy Reserves 868,295 868,295 143,137 0 0 868,295 Reserves Maintenance - Rockingham Reserves 2,042,337 2,042,337 394,024 (26,006) 0 2,016,331 Reserves Maintenance - Safety Bay Reserves 650,953 650,953 151,189 0 0 650,953 Reserves Maintenance - Secret Harbour Reserves 835,021 835,021 112,150 0 0 835,021 Reserves Maintenance - Shoalwater Reserves 346,554 346,554 74,762 0 0 346,554 Reserves Maintenance - Singleton Reserves 252,457 252,457 33,911 0 0 252,457 Reserves Maintenance - Waikiki Reserves 226,748 226,748 62,801 0 0 226,748 Reserves Maintenance- Warnbro Reserves 753,996 753,996 156,651 0 0 753,996 Operating Projects - Strategic Planning & Environm 254,599 254,599 52,294 0 47,440 302,039 Operating Expenses - Public Halls Civic Centre 35,117 35,117 10,961 0 0 35,117 Operating Expenses - Community & Leisure Fac/Admin 6,617 6,617 233 0 0 6,617 Employee Costs - Admin OH Parks Services 291,739 291,739 72,385 0 0 291,739 Operating Expenses - Admin OH Parks Services 170,450 170,450 14,816 0 0 170,450 Employee Costs - Direct PWO Parks Services 1,615,135 1,615,135 379,154 0 0 1,615,135 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Parks Services 1,159,018 1,159,018 346,802 0 0 1,159,018 Operating Expenses - PWO Parks Services 230,677 230,677 32,753 0 0 230,677 Operating Expenses - Rec & Culture Parks Services 226,758 226,758 3,852 0 0 226,758 Operating Expenses - Bush Fire Brigades 12,006 12,006 0 0 0 12,006 Operating Expenses - Jetties & Boat Ramps 38,144 38,144 7,011 0 0 38,144 Road Maintenance - Verge Mtce (Parks Emp) 3,307,554 3,307,554 587,056 0 0 3,307,554 Road Maintenance - Street Trees 1,311,457 1,311,457 303,191 0 0 1,311,457 Reserve Maintenance - Public Access Ways 157,430 157,430 0 (40,000) 0 117,430 Foreshore Maintenance - Rockingham 647,039 647,039 102,872 0 0 647,039 Foreshore Maintenance - Shoalwater 126,602 126,602 18,315 0 0 126,602 Foreshore Maintenance - Safety Bay 123,511 123,511 48,210 0 0 123,511 Foreshore Maintenance - Waikiki 85,673 85,673 16,308 0 0 85,673 Foreshore Maintenance - Warnbro 138,226 138,226 13,333 0 0 138,226 Foreshore Maintenance - Port Kennedy 96,673 96,673 17,928 0 0 96,673 Foreshore Maintenance - Secret Harbour 100,937 100,937 23,589 0 0 100,937 Foreshore Maintenance - Golden Bay 69,513 69,513 13,554 0 0 69,513 Foreshore Maintenance - Singleton 65,335 65,335 18,617 0 0 65,335 Foreshore Maintenance - Point Perron 21,870 21,870 2,644 0 0 21,870 Operating Expenses - Compliance & Emergency Liaiso 0 0 323 0 0 0 Operating Expenses - Baldivis South Community Cent 67,774 67,774 9,845 0 0 67,774 Non Cash Expenses - Rec & Culture Parks Services 83,857 83,857 0 0 0 83,857 Employee Costs - Bush Fire Control EPS 110,648 110,648 26,109 0 0 110,648 Income Operating Revenue - Bushfire Control (150,000) (150,000) 0 0 0 (150,000) Operating Revenue - Private Works (250,000) (250,000) (62,446) 0 0 (250,000) Operating Revenue - Recreation Grounds 0 0 (178,182) (178,182) 0 (178,182) Operating Revenue - Rec & Culture Parks Services (20,800) (20,800) (3,375) 0 0 (20,800) Grand Total 27,161,500 27,161,500 4,683,289 71,783 (319,935) 26,913,348
Page 21 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Infrastructure Project Delivery
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Infrastructure Project Delivery 16,563,292 16,563,292 1,446,866 (1,021,325) 347,819 15,889,786 Capital Expense Build -Admin Bridge Wing Glazing/Door handle replc 6,830 6,830 0 0 0 6,830 Build - Admin refurb council chambers fitout 415,266 415,266 0 0 0 415,266 Build -Admin Square Build Latch Circulation Lumina 33,733 33,733 0 0 0 33,733 Build -Old Abattoir Darile St Hillman Roof Renewal 0 0 0 4,337 0 4,337 Park-Koorana Resv Power Upgrade for two extra colm 188,757 188,757 0 (188,757) 0 0 Build -Admin Square Building Braile Signage 33,733 33,733 0 0 0 33,733 Build-Admin Build Refurb Staff Toilet/ Change Room 238,645 238,645 0 0 (8,302) 230,343 Build -Admin Build Refurb Public Toilets & Change 304,170 304,170 0 0 0 304,170 Building - Aqua Jetty Resurface leisure pool beach 35,864 35,864 0 (32,995) 0 2,869 Build Governor Rd Toilet Refurb ex/internal items 253,884 253,884 0 0 0 253,884 Build Point Peron Toilet Block Refurb ex/internal 254,272 254,272 0 0 0 254,272 Build - Aquatic Centre Refurb Internal office 92,776 92,776 104,346 30,000 5,456 128,232 Build -Rockingham Foreshore Activity Node 198,047 198,047 0 (198,047) 0 0 Road - Lynx Way Reserve - PAW Lighting 0 0 0 2,000 93,000 95,000 Build Golden Bay Foreshore Toilet Refurb ex/intern 253,884 253,884 0 0 0 253,884 Parks - Veterans Memorial Park replace skate park 0 0 4,518 24,433 0 24,433 Build - Aqua Jetty Replacement of Pooler Liner 319,943 319,943 439,359 (18,458) 198,515 500,000 Build - City Park Toilet Refurb internal & externa 55,642 55,642 0 0 0 55,642 Build - Don Cuthbertson Reserve Toilet Refurb inte 47,190 47,190 0 0 0 47,190 Build - Harmony Pk Toilet Refurb internal & extern 57,530 57,530 0 0 0 57,530 Build - Mike Barnett Stadium Prepare & paint all e 124,698 124,698 0 0 0 124,698 Build - Waikiki F'shore Toilet Francis St roof she 54,507 54,507 0 0 0 54,507 Parks -Light Nottely Crescent Res Replace poles 8,878 8,878 0 7,819 (16,697) 0 Roads -Light S'Harbour Stg 1 Golf Island redesign 475,721 475,721 0 0 0 475,721 Build - Mike Barnett Centre Install PV array 101,390 101,390 17,225 0 0 101,390 Build - R'ham Bowling Club Install PV array 15,789 15,789 10,889 0 0 15,789 Build - Mike Barnett Centre install LED lighting 38,275 38,275 0 83,000 (635) 120,640 Build - Rockingham Aquatic Centre install PV array 66,917 66,917 0 (66,917) 0 0 Build - Admin Build/Clock Tower-render replacement 618,096 618,096 2,920 0 4,920 623,016 Build - Mike Barnett Stadium Refurb internal & ext 195,611 195,611 69 0 0 195,611 Roads -Ligh S'Harbour Stage 1 Anstey Rd Redesign 342,384 342,384 0 0 0 342,384 Build - Fantasy Pk Toilet Refurb internal & extern 55,642 55,642 0 0 0 55,642 Build - Waikiki F'shore Toilet Malibu Rd refurb in 274,751 274,751 0 0 0 274,751 Parks - Alf Powell Reserve Demo replace & relocate 683,835 683,835 212,013 65,000 2,348 751,183 Build -Secret Harbour Com Centre Install PV array 27,067 27,067 17,311 0 (364) 26,703 Build - Bridport Toilets Refurb internal & externa 99,913 99,913 0 0 0 99,913 Waterfront Village-Foreshore Park Redevel 0 0 3,785 0 90,000 90,000 Build - 33 Crompton Building Carpark 2,028 2,028 (1,535) 0 (511) 1,517 Misc Infra - Aqua Jetty refurbish 25m pool surface 167,294 167,294 0 0 47,000 214,294 Build -Coastal Comm Cntr Tangade refrb in/external 15,209 15,209 0 (514) (14,695) 0 Build - Depot plant workshop refurbish in/external 35,487 35,487 0 0 0 35,487 Build -Port Kennedy Comm Centre refurb in/external 141,568 141,568 0 (81,568) 0 60,000 Build - Rockingham Gem Club refurbish in/external 388,447 388,447 0 0 (5,631) 382,816 Build - Safety Bay Library asbestos removal 28,314 28,314 0 (28,314) 0 0 Build-Singleton F'shore toilets refurb in/external 254,197 254,197 0 0 0 254,197 Build - Watts Rd Girl Guid Scout Hal refurb toilet 186,384 186,384 0 0 0 186,384 Park - Lagoon Res Sec Harbour install double BBQ 19,211 19,211 9,992 (9,531) 0 9,680 Park - Singleton Foreshore replace BBQ 5893 3,485 3,485 0 (543) (2,942) 0 Park -Veterans Memorial Pk replace BBQ 47548-56414 0 0 4,241 4,241 0 4,241 Park - City Park replace three aged double BBQs 45,626 45,626 35,614 (10,012) 0 35,614 Park - Phoebe Hymus Res replace BBQ 56267 - 56269 24,334 24,334 0 0 0 24,334 Park - Lagoon Res S Harbour skillion shelters 59,914 59,914 0 10,000 0 69,914 Build - Centralised clocks Mike Barnett 17,577 17,577 0 (739) (16,838) 0 Build - Aqua Jetty Car Park Install LED lighting 161,524 161,524 57,362 5,000 (13,366) 153,158 Build - Hillman Hall install PV array 0 0 0 150 0 150 Build - Extension for Singleton 20,278 20,278 0 58,347 0 78,625 Build - Depot Admin & Workshop refrb in/external 168,796 168,796 3,085 0 (10,674) 158,122 Misc Infra - Depot small vehicle shed refurbish 62,048 62,048 0 0 0 62,048 Misc Infra - Depot Streetsweeper rplce parts shed 24,426 24,426 0 0 0 24,426 Build-Safety Bay Library in/external upgrd toilets 546,025 546,025 13,976 123,314 (984) 668,355 Build - Tuart Park Toilets refurb internal items 95,780 95,780 0 0 0 95,780 Park - Emerald Park replace aged bbq 55127-55640 26,361 26,361 0 0 0 26,361 Build - Bin Compound (Mike Barnett) 8,537 8,537 0 0 0 8,537 Build - Hourglass Changerooms - Install PV array 11,278 11,278 2,736 14,205 (364) 25,119 Park - Sports Res Floodlighting Club Infra Upgrade 415,266 415,266 0 (415,266) 0 0 Park -Amadeus Res rplc timber slats footbridge 44,655 44,655 0 0 0 44,655 Build - Arts Centre improvements (CCB) 224,037 224,037 0 0 0 224,037 Park - LarkHill Hockey rplc pitch playing surface 219,015 219,015 771 10,000 6,975 235,990 Misc Infra - Millar Rd rplc trnsf station toilet 53,356 53,356 0 0 0 53,356 Park - Phoebe Hymus Res replace aged BBQ 56271 10,139 10,139 0 0 0 10,139 Build - Aqua Jetty Slide Tower Renewal 90,224 90,224 5,401 (78,235) (11,988) 1 Build - Depot Motorbike shelter replace structure 23,740 23,740 0 0 0 23,740 Park - Bell Park replace six agged BBQ 37,514 37,514 0 0 0 37,514 Build - Upgrade Depot fleet services office 28,664 28,664 0 0 0 28,664 Misc Infra - Millar Road Landfill Replace Diesel P 20,278 20,278 0 0 0 20,278 Misc Infra - Aquatic Centre Garrison Fence 65,904 65,904 61,309 (4,595) 0 61,309 Build - Youth Facility Roof Replace 91,251 91,251 0 (91,251) 0 0 Build - Lark Hill Rugby Building Refurbish Interna 485,216 485,216 0 20,000 0 505,216 Build - Aqua Jetty 25m Pool Tiling 0 0 141,080 180,706 0 180,706 Build - 33 Crompton Road Refurbishment 892 892 0 0 0 892 Parks -Secret Harbour Stage 2 rplc street lighting 1,028,520 1,028,520 0 0 (1,054) 1,027,466 Build - Albenga Toilet In/external refurb Accessib 34,658 34,658 0 0 0 34,658 Build - Churchill Park Toilet Refurb in/external 99,024 99,024 0 0 0 99,024 Build - Main Admin intl. Paint, Kitchen & flooring 183,193 183,193 0 0 0 183,193 Build - Hourglass Res Clubrooms Internal refurb 128,731 128,731 0 100,000 0 228,731 Build- Lark Hill Softball/Hockey Refurb in/externl 47,501 47,501 0 0 0 47,501 Build McLarty Hall Refurb internal & external item 39,609 39,609 0 11,883 0 51,492 Build-Paul Garnett Changeroom Laminex partitioning 21,785 21,785 0 0 0 21,785 Build - Safety Bay Bowling Club Structural Repairs 19,805 19,805 0 0 0 19,805 Misc Infra - S Bay Tennis Club rplc entrance fence 17,824 17,824 0 0 0 17,824 Parks - Maroubra Res rplc poles and luminaires 85,000 85,000 0 0 0 85,000 Parks - Emerald Pk rplc and retrofit lights on pat 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 Parks-Phoebe Hymus Fshore rplc retrofit lights pat 26,000 26,000 0 0 0 26,000 Build - Rplc Bus Shelter Read St Stop 17247 19,805 19,805 0 0 0 19,805 Build - Rplc Bus Shelter Malibu Rd Stop 21347 19,805 19,805 0 0 0 19,805 Build - Rplc Bus Shelter Read St Stop 17309 19,805 19,805 0 0 0 19,805 Build - Mike Barnett Court ventilation (fans x 7) 108,925 108,925 0 0 0 108,925 Build- Gary Holland Comm Centre Disability access 29,707 29,707 0 0 0 29,707 Build - Pound Refurbishment 19,805 19,805 0 0 0 19,805 Build - Increase Cat accommodation at the pound 29,707 29,707 0 0 0 29,707 Build -Administration Building Stage 2 LED Upgrade 64,365 64,365 0 0 0 64,365 Build - Compliance Services Building Install PV 49,512 49,512 0 0 0 49,512 Park - Bari Bari Reserve Install LED lighting 39,609 39,609 0 0 0 39,609 Misc Infra-Baldivis District Sports Complex courts 803,080 803,080 0 (803,080) 0 0 Park - Colonial reserve - Replace lighting 7,922 7,922 0 0 0 7,922 Park - Palomino Reserve - Replace light poles 69,316 69,316 0 0 0 69,316 Park - Koorana Park switchboard upgrade 74,267 74,267 0 (74,267) 0 0 Park-Rockingham Foreshore automated event lighting 44,561 44,561 0 0 0 44,561 Park - Bramstone Reserve upgrade lighting 79,219 79,219 0 0 0 79,219 Misc Infra Redevelopment of Balance Tank 133,506 133,506 0 0 4,650 138,156 Build - McLarty Hall Bridge Club minor In/External 11,883 11,883 0 (11,883) 0 0 Misc Infra - S Bay Bowling Club workshop replace 29,707 29,707 0 0 0 29,707 Build - Rplc Bus Shelter Safety Bay Rd Stop 17354 19,805 19,805 0 0 0 19,805 Park - The Village Green Install LED lighting 70,000 70,000 0 (65,000) 0 5,000
Page 22 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Engineering and Parks Services Department Infrastructure Project Delivery
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Park -Larkhill Sport Res Hockey Upgrade LED lights 376,289 376,289 0 0 0 376,289 Park - Georgetown Dr Reserve Switchboard upgrade 108,925 108,925 453 0 0 108,925 Build - Georgetown Res Change room Refurb in/exter 227,753 227,753 0 0 0 227,753 Build- Lark Hill Soccer/Cricket Refurb in/external 47,501 47,501 0 0 0 47,501 Build - Fantasy Park - Disability access 29,707 29,707 0 0 0 29,707 Roads -Light S' Harbour Stg 1 Resid Replace poles 400,218 400,218 0 0 0 400,218 Build - Rockingham Tennis Club Install PV array 9,903 9,903 0 7,000 0 16,903 Build - Rockingham Youth Centre Fit-out 49,512 49,512 0 0 0 49,512 Build - Autumn Centre - Pergola & Croquet Shelter 148,535 148,535 0 0 0 148,535 Build - Churchill Park - Disability access 69,316 69,316 0 0 0 69,316 Build - Dog Pound and Operations Centre 99,024 99,024 0 0 0 99,024 Build - Mike Barnett Instal Video Wall 0 0 0 63,900 0 63,900 Parks - Veterans Memorial Skate Park Floodlighting 0 0 0 140,000 0 140,000 Build - Replace Bus Shelter 118661 Safety Bay Rd 0 0 0 20,506 0 20,506 Build - Replace Bus Shelter 64938 Safety Bay Rd 0 0 0 20,506 0 20,506 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Admin OH Infrastructure Projects 311,607 311,607 64,406 2,000 0 313,607 Operating Expenses - Admin OH Infrastructure Proje 53,700 53,700 129 0 0 53,700 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Infrastructure Proje 785,841 785,841 224,922 150,300 0 936,141 Operating Expenses - PWO Infrastructure Projects 31,581 31,581 10,491 0 0 31,581 Grand Total 16,563,292 16,563,292 1,446,866 (1,021,325) 347,819 15,889,786
Page 23 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Planning and Development Services Department Planning Directorate and Support
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Planning Directorate and Support 2,121,580 2,121,580 222,241 95,000 0 2,216,580 Capital Expense Park - Shoalwater/Safety Bay Foreshore Development 1,061,388 1,061,388 0 0 0 1,061,388 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Planning Directorate & Support 822,692 822,692 208,806 0 0 822,692 Operating Expenses - Planning Directorate & Suppor 217,500 217,500 1,941 85,000 0 302,500 Operating Projects - Planning Directorate & Suppor 20,000 20,000 11,493 10,000 0 30,000 Grand Total 2,121,580 2,121,580 222,241 95,000 0 2,216,580
Page 24 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Planning and Development Services Department Health and Building Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Building Services 802,637 802,637 64,209 0 0 802,637 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Building Services 1,317,681 1,317,681 298,394 0 0 1,317,681 Operating Expenses - Building Services 108,886 108,886 7,758 0 0 108,886 Income Operating Revenue - Building Services (623,930) (623,930) (241,944) 0 0 (623,930) Health Services 1,497,148 1,497,148 274,031 0 0 1,497,148 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Health Services 1,564,352 1,564,352 392,559 0 0 1,564,352 Operating Expenses - Health Services 164,186 164,186 47,771 0 0 164,186 Operating Projects - Health Services 5,000 5,000 23 0 0 5,000 Income Operating Revenue - Health Services (236,390) (236,390) (166,320) 0 0 (236,390) Grand Total 2,299,785 2,299,785 338,241 0 0 2,299,785
Page 25 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Planning and Development Services Department Strategic Planning and Environment
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Strategic Planning and Environment 2,680,006 2,680,006 245,650 51,773 (6,845) 2,724,934 Capital Income Proceeds on Sale of Assets - Strategic Plan/Enviro (12,000) (12,000) (8,314) 0 0 (12,000) Operating Expense Employee Costs - Strategic Planning & Environmt 1,126,452 1,126,452 243,972 0 0 1,126,452 Operating Expenses - Strategic Planning & Environm 262,186 262,186 25,504 21,773 0 283,959 Operating Projects - Strategic Planning & Environm 1,306,188 1,306,188 1,065 30,000 (6,845) 1,329,343 Income Operating Revenue - Strategic Planning & Environme (2,820) (2,820) (16,578) 0 0 (2,820) Grand Total 2,680,006 2,680,006 245,650 51,773 (6,845) 2,724,934
Page 26 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Planning and Development Services Department Statutory Planning
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Statutory Planning 1,192,811 1,192,811 178,547 21,525 311 1,214,647 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Statutory Planning 1,334,278 1,334,278 287,190 0 0 1,334,278 Operating Expenses - Statutory Planning 118,495 118,495 9,862 20,000 0 138,495 Operating Projects - Statutory Planning 74,538 74,538 6,860 2,025 311 76,874 Income Operating Revenue - Statutory Planning (334,500) (334,500) (125,365) (500) 0 (335,000) Grand Total 1,192,811 1,192,811 178,547 21,525 311 1,214,647
Page 27 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Planning and Development Services Department Compliance and Emergency Liaison
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Compliance and Emergency Liaison 5,898,082 5,898,082 788,718 (98,897) 0 5,799,185 Capital Income Proceeds on Salle of Assets - Compliance Liasion (33,000) (33,000) 0 0 0 (33,000) Operating Expense Employee Costs - Animal Ctrl/Rangers General 1,945,306 1,945,306 505,870 0 0 1,945,306 Employee Costs - Bush Fire Control 352,699 352,699 67,315 0 0 352,699 Employee Costs – Smart Watch 1,763,736 1,763,736 350,134 0 0 1,763,736 Non Cash Expenses - Bush Fire Control 1,473 1,473 0 0 0 1,473 Operating Expenses - Animal Ctrl/Rangers General 365,065 365,065 55,533 0 0 365,065 Operating Expenses - Bush Fire Control 199,203 199,203 34,580 0 0 199,203 Operating Expenses - Rockingham SES 64,015 64,015 11,308 (6,900) 0 57,115 Operating Projects - Bush Fire Control 20,000 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 Employee Costs - Compliance & Emergency Liaison 1,607,823 1,607,823 420,247 0 0 1,607,823 Operating Expenses - Smart Watch 86,400 86,400 17,889 0 0 86,400 Non Cash Expenses- Compliance & Emergency Liaison 45,711 45,711 0 0 0 45,711 Operating Expenses - Bush Fire Brigades 21,318 21,318 299 (21,318) 0 0 Operating Expenses - Compliance & Emergency Liaiso 516,133 516,133 168,637 78,946 0 595,079 Operating Expenses - Building Development 41,000 41,000 1,321 0 0 41,000 Income Operating Revenue - Animal Ctrl/Rangers General (597,400) (597,400) (423,037) (70,000) 0 (667,400) Operating Revenue - Baldiv-Singl Bush Fire Brigade 0 0 0 (78,625) 0 (78,625) Operating Revenue - Bushfire Control (2,900) (2,900) (516) 0 0 (2,900) Operating Revenue - Rockingham SES (71,000) (71,000) 0 0 0 (71,000) Operating Revenue - Compliance & Emergency Liaison (421,500) (421,500) (419,839) (1,000) 0 (422,500) Operating Revenue - Building Development (6,000) (6,000) (1,024) 0 0 (6,000) Grand Total 5,898,082 5,898,082 788,718 (98,897) 0 5,799,185
Page 28 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Planning and Development Services Department Land and Development Infrastructure
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Land and Development Infrastructure 2,018,242 2,018,242 220,913 0 0 2,018,242 Capital Expense Roads - Nairn Drive Duplication Project 1,099,921 1,099,921 0 0 0 1,099,921 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Land & Development Infrastruc 74,281 74,281 11,939 0 0 74,281 Employee Costs - Land & Development Infrastructure 974,466 974,466 243,603 0 0 974,466 Non Cash Expenses - Land & Development Infrastruct (4,982) (4,982) 0 0 0 (4,982) Income Operating Revenue - Streets, Rds, Bridges-Construc (125,444) (125,444) (34,629) 0 0 (125,444) Grand Total 2,018,242 2,018,242 220,913 0 0 2,018,242
Page 29 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Corporate Services Department Corporate Directorate & Support
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Developer Contribution Scheme (3,681,039) (3,681,039) (180,245) (18,229) 0 (3,699,268) Capital Expense Transfer to Reserve- Development Contribution Sche 1,518,356 1,518,356 0 0 0 1,518,356 Income Transfer from Reserve - Development Contribution S (3,857,112) (3,857,112) 0 0 0 (3,857,112) Operating Expense Employee Costs - Development Contribution Scheme 145,740 145,740 24,945 (16,855) 0 128,885 Operating Expenses - Development Contribution Schm 30,333 30,333 0 (1,374) 0 28,959 Income Operating Revenue - Development Contribution Schem (1,518,356) (1,518,356) (205,189) 0 0 (1,518,356) Corporate Directorate & Support 1,645,469 1,645,469 209,026 90,000 0 1,735,469 Capital Expense Land - Purchase of Carpark 720,000 720,000 0 0 0 720,000 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Corporate Direct/Support 1,065,708 1,065,708 281,751 0 0 1,065,708 Operating Expenses - Corporate Direct/Support 128,012 128,012 14,200 90,000 0 218,012 Operating Expenses - Lotteries House 13,019 13,019 867 0 0 13,019 Operating Expenses - Pre-school 7,621 7,621 2,055 0 0 7,621 Operating Expenses - Youth Services 16,072 16,072 1,573 0 0 16,072 Operating Expenses - Youth Venue 37,051 37,051 1,660 0 0 37,051 Operating Expenses -Rockingham Day Care Centre 5,300 5,300 1,773 0 0 5,300 Operating Projects - Corporate Direct/Support 20,000 20,000 6,693 0 0 20,000 Income Operating Revenue - Caravan Parks & Camp/Grounds (77,202) (77,202) (19,301) 0 0 (77,202) Operating Revenue - Corporate Direct/Support (46,300) (46,300) (333) 0 0 (46,300) Operating Revenue - Lotteries House (4,200) (4,200) (83) 0 0 (4,200) Operating Revenue - Pre-school (6,000) (6,000) (525) 0 0 (6,000) Operating Revenue - Leasing Services (233,612) (233,612) (81,304) 0 0 (233,612) Grand Total (2,035,570) (2,035,570) 28,781 71,771 0 (1,963,799)
Page 30 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Corporate Services Department Financial Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Financial Services (98,495,064) (98,495,064) (91,515,287) 7,621,460 (33,393) (90,906,997) Capital Expense Loan Redemption - Animal Control/Rangers General 44,006 44,006 0 0 0 44,006 Transfers to Reserves - Interest 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 500,000 Loan Redemption - Larkhill Complex 825,537 825,537 56,499 0 0 825,537 Loan Redemption - CCB Arts & Culture 130,954 130,954 48,431 0 0 130,954 Loan Redemption SS - CCB Arts & Culture 7,755 7,755 3,820 0 0 7,755 Loan Redemption - Aqua Jetty 121,091 121,091 0 0 0 121,091 Loan Redemption SS - Recreation Grounds 16,766 16,766 8,251 0 0 16,766 Income Loan Repayment SS - CCB Arts & Culture 0 0 (3,820) 0 0 0 Proceeds from Borrowings-Baldivis District Sportsp (10,000,000) (10,000,000) 0 0 0 (10,000,000) Transfer From Reserve - Capital Works (3,693,903) (3,693,903) 0 3,693,903 0 0 Proceeds from Borrowings - Koorana (3,500,000) (3,500,000) 0 0 0 (3,500,000) Transfer from Administration & Community Reserve (1,141,275) (1,141,275) 0 0 0 (1,141,275) Proceeds from Borrowings-Baldivis Indoor Rec Centr (17,000,000) (17,000,000) 0 2,500,000 0 (14,500,000) Operating Expense Employee Costs - Animal Ctrl/Rangers General 6,226 6,226 0 0 0 6,226 Employee Costs - Autumn Centre 145 145 0 0 0 145 Employee Costs - Building Services 7,302 7,302 0 0 0 7,302 Employee Costs - Bush Fire Control 1,349 1,349 0 0 0 1,349 Employee Costs - CCB Administration 2,038 2,038 0 0 0 2,038 Employee Costs - CCB Arts & Culture 2,296 2,296 0 0 0 2,296 Employee Costs - CCB Sport & Recreation 1,525 1,525 0 0 0 1,525 Employee Costs - CEO Directorate & Support 225 225 0 0 0 225 Employee Costs - Community & Leisure Facil/Admin 1,874 1,874 0 0 0 1,874 Employee Costs - Community Developmt Dir/Support 6,308 6,308 0 0 0 6,308 Employee Costs - Community Safety 2,764 2,764 0 0 0 2,764 Employee Costs - Community Services Admin 1,589 1,589 0 0 0 1,589 Employee Costs - Corporate Direct/Support 3,500 3,500 0 0 0 3,500 Employee Costs - Executive Services 262 262 0 0 0 262 Employee Costs - Health Services 11,259 11,259 0 0 0 11,259 Employee Costs - Human Resource 78 78 0 0 0 78 Employee Costs - Library Services - Safety Bay 175 175 0 0 0 175 Employee Costs - Library Services Admin 3,826 3,826 0 0 0 3,826 Employee Costs - Millar Road Landfill Operations 3,091 3,091 0 0 0 3,091 Employee Costs - Planning Directorate & Support 14,582 14,582 (3,686) 0 0 14,582 Employee Costs - Rockghm Outreach Youth Service 1,144 1,144 0 0 0 1,144 Employee Costs - Rockingham Aquatic Centre 192 192 0 0 0 192 Employee Costs - Sanitation & Waste Services 52 52 0 0 0 52 Employee Costs – Smart Watch 1,712 1,712 0 0 0 1,712 Employee Costs - Statutory Planning 4,028 4,028 0 0 0 4,028 Employee Costs - Strategic Planning & Environmt 2,943 2,943 0 0 0 2,943 Non Cash Expenses - Aqua Jetty 1,196,717 1,196,717 120,366 0 0 1,196,717 Non Cash Expenses - Autumn Centre 146,620 146,620 9,584 0 0 146,620 Non Cash Expenses - Baldivis Bush Fire Brigade 48,694 48,694 0 0 0 48,694 Non Cash Expenses - Bert England Lodge 110,179 110,179 0 0 0 110,179 Non Cash Expenses - Building Services 576,461 576,461 73,953 0 0 576,461 Non Cash Expenses - Bus Shelters 86,474 86,474 0 0 0 86,474 Non Cash Expenses - Bush Fire Control 19,048 19,048 3,521 0 0 19,048 Non Cash Expenses - CCB Active Ageing 2,154 2,154 380 0 0 2,154 Non Cash Expenses - CCB Administration 418,676 418,676 31,543 0 0 418,676 Non Cash Expenses - CCB Community Developmt Yout 26,466 26,466 4,719 0 0 26,466 Non Cash Expenses - CCB Sport & Recreation 23,758 23,758 3,015 0 0 23,758 Non Cash Expenses - Challenger Court 150,292 150,292 0 0 0 150,292 Non Cash Expenses - Challenger Lodge 104,786 104,786 570 0 0 104,786 Non Cash Expenses - Community Safety 340,410 340,410 22,070 0 0 340,410 Non Cash Expenses - Community Services Admin 205,819 205,819 4,087 0 0 205,819 Non Cash Expenses - Corporate Direct/Support 35,709 35,709 24,197 0 0 35,709 Non Cash Expenses - Executive Services 330,957 330,957 25,537 0 0 330,957 Non Cash Expenses - Foreshores & Beaches 114,059 114,059 0 0 0 114,059 Non Cash Expenses - Gary Holland Community Centre 193,909 193,909 0 0 0 193,909 Non Cash Expenses - Health Services 443,508 443,508 54,084 0 0 443,508 Non Cash Expenses - Human Resource 168,682 168,682 21,286 0 0 168,682 Non Cash Expenses - Lotteries House 47,216 47,216 0 0 0 47,216 Non Cash Expenses - Maternal & Infant Health 55,563 55,563 0 0 0 55,563 Non Cash Expenses - Members Expenses 2,555,336 2,555,336 0 0 0 2,555,336 Non Cash Expenses - Mike Barnett 191,333 191,333 12,810 0 0 191,333 Non Cash Expenses - Millar Road Landfill Operation 2,412,663 2,412,663 58,277 0 0 2,412,663 Non Cash Expenses - Other 391,685 391,685 65,026 0 0 391,685 Non Cash Expenses - Other Governance Expenses (13,188,324) (13,188,324) (2,717,098) 0 0 (13,188,324) Non Cash Expenses - Planning Directorate & Support 309,768 309,768 31,646 0 0 309,768 Non Cash Expenses - Plant Operation Costs 824,738 824,738 21,874 0 0 824,738 Non Cash Expenses - Pre-school 29,711 29,711 165 0 0 29,711 Non Cash Expenses - Public Halls Civic Centre 668,148 668,148 0 0 0 668,148 Non Cash Expenses - Rockingham Aquatic Centre 328,707 328,707 33,169 0 0 328,707 Non Cash Expenses - Rockingham Day Care Centre 39,993 39,993 211 0 0 39,993 Non Cash Expenses - Rockingham SES 47,872 47,872 0 0 0 47,872 Non Cash Expenses - Sanitation & Waste Services 1,367,124 1,367,124 131,071 0 0 1,367,124 Non Cash Expenses - Statutory Planning 263,898 263,898 21,569 0 0 263,898 Non Cash Expenses - Strategy and Corporate Communi 74,769 74,769 13,624 0 0 74,769 Non Cash Expenses - Streets, Rds, Bridges-Rd/Mtce 20,670,279 20,670,279 0 0 0 20,670,279 Non Cash Expenses - Warnbro Recreation Centre 2,066 2,066 0 0 0 2,066 Non Cash Expenses - Youth Services 62,824 62,824 6,236 0 0 62,824 Non Cash Expenses - Youth Venue 91,685 91,685 0 0 0 91,685 Non Cash Expenses- Animal Ctrl/Rangers General 887,325 887,325 101,446 0 0 887,325 Operating Expenses - Animal Ctrl/Rangers General 16,792 16,792 8,856 0 0 16,792 Operating Expenses - Aqua Jetty 26,071 26,071 14,011 0 0 26,071 Operating Expenses - Autumn Centre 3,800 3,800 2,004 0 0 3,800 Operating Expenses - Bert England Lodge 12,019 12,019 0 0 0 12,019 Operating Expenses - Building Services 11,136 11,136 5,873 0 0 11,136 Operating Expenses - Bush Fire Control 1,679 1,679 886 0 0 1,679 Operating Expenses - CCB Administration 6,426 6,426 3,389 0 0 6,426 Operating Expenses - CCB Arts & Culture 3,276 3,276 1,715 0 0 3,276 Operating Expenses - CCB Community Developmt Yout 1,679 1,679 886 0 0 1,679 Operating Expenses - CCB Sport & Recreation 4,198 4,198 2,214 0 0 4,198 Operating Expenses - CEO Directorate & Support 15,131 15,131 7,978 0 0 15,131 Operating Expenses - Community Safety 4,400 4,400 2,309 0 0 4,400 Operating Expenses - Corporate Direct/Support 7,248 7,248 3,822 0 0 7,248 Operating Expenses - Executive Services 4,604 4,604 2,428 0 0 4,604 Operating Expenses - Foreshores & Beaches 1,878 1,878 1,823 0 0 1,878 Operating Expenses - Health Services 12,639 12,639 6,665 0 0 12,639 Operating Expenses - Human Resource 11,622 11,622 6,129 0 0 11,622 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Rockingham 7,379 7,379 3,892 0 0 7,379 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Safety Bay 7,712 7,712 4,067 0 0 7,712 Operating Expenses - Library Services - Warnbro 4,308 4,308 2,272 0 0 4,308 Operating Expenses - Library Services Admin 5,410 5,410 2,629 0 0 5,410 Operating Expenses - Litter Team Operations 25,430 25,430 19,886 0 0 25,430 Operating Expenses - Members Expenses 1,533 1,533 1,400 0 0 1,533 Operating Expenses - Mike Barnett 5,613 5,613 2,960 0 0 5,613 Operating Expenses - Plant Operation Costs 225,118 225,118 154,236 0 0 225,118 Operating Expenses - Private Works 81,548 81,548 30,465 130,100 0 211,648 Operating Expenses - Rates 1,585,000 1,585,000 1,128,055 0 0 1,585,000 Operating Expenses - Rockingham Aquatic Centre 17,964 17,964 9,474 0 0 17,964 Operating Expenses - Sanitation & Waste Services 36,913 36,913 28,926 0 0 36,913
Page 31 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Corporate Services Department Financial Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Operating Expenses - Statutory Planning 10,075 10,075 5,314 0 0 10,075 Operating Expenses - Youth Services 4,243 4,243 2,237 0 0 4,243 Employee Costs - Compliance & Emergency Liaison 4,169 4,169 0 0 0 4,169 Employee Costs - CCB Challenger Court 3,235 3,235 0 0 0 3,235 Employee Costs - Aqua Jetty 424 424 0 0 0 424 Operating Expenses - Investment Attraction 840 840 443 0 0 840 Non Cash Expenses - Investment Attraction 142,089 142,089 6,315 0 0 142,089 Operating Expenses - Customer & Corporate Support 17,466 17,466 9,211 0 0 17,466 Non Cash Expenses - Community Developmt Dir/Suppo 45,405 45,405 5,949 0 0 45,405 Non Cash Expenses - Sanitation Other 23,876 23,876 2,326 0 0 23,876 Operating Expenses - Millar Road Landfill Operatio 51,534 51,534 41,758 0 0 51,534 Operating Expenses - Strategic Planning & Environm 6,584 6,584 3,472 0 0 6,584 Non Cash Expenses - Strategic Planning & Enviromen 145,762 145,762 16,830 0 0 145,762 Operating Expenses - Planning Directorate & Suppor 4,729 4,729 2,494 0 0 4,729 Non Cash Expenses - Reserves Maintenance 6,814,899 6,814,899 0 0 0 6,814,899 Non Cash Expenses - Larkhill Complex 411,668 411,668 0 0 0 411,668 Operating Expenses - Community Infrastruct/Plannin 3,358 3,358 1,771 0 0 3,358 Non Cash Expenses - Community Infrast/Planning 200,341 200,341 33,166 0 0 200,341 Employee Costs - Mike Barnett 166 166 0 0 0 166 Operating Expenses - Community & Leisure Fac/Admin 3,800 3,800 2,004 0 0 3,800 Non Cash Expenses - Community & Leisure Faci/Admin 740,704 740,704 127,719 0 0 740,704 Non Cash Expenses - CCB Arts & Culture 128,094 128,094 7,384 0 0 128,094 Non Cash Expenses - Plant Nursery 802 802 1 0 0 802 Employee Costs - Legal Services & General Counsel 4,523 4,523 0 0 0 4,523 Operating Expenses - Legal Services & General Coun 1,547 1,547 816 0 0 1,547 Non Cash Expenses - Legal Services & General Couns 8,989 8,989 2,801 0 0 8,989 Operating Expenses - Mary Davies Library & Comm 8,097 8,097 4,270 0 0 8,097 Non Cash Expenses - Millar Rd Recycling Operations 20,935 20,935 1,149 0 0 20,935 Non Cash Expenses - Millar Rd Transfer Station 89,502 89,502 5,931 0 0 89,502 Operating Expenses - Waste Education Centre 840 840 443 0 0 840 Non Cash Expenses - Waste Education Centre 32,970 32,970 1,074 0 0 32,970 Operating Expenses - Land & Development Infrastruc 5,745 5,745 3,030 0 0 5,745 Non Cash Expenses- Compliance & Emergency Liaison 477,594 477,594 61,137 0 0 477,594 Non Cash Expenses - Caravan Parks & Camp/Grounds 29,124 29,124 0 0 0 29,124 Employee Costs - Members Expenses 3,338 3,338 0 0 0 3,338 Operating Expenses - Bert England Lodge (SC) 5,000 5,000 2,815 0 0 5,000 Employee Costs - Admin OH EPS Directorate 2,300 2,300 0 0 0 2,300 Operating Expenses - Admin OH EPS Directorate 7,556 7,556 3,985 0 0 7,556 Employee Costs - Direct PWO Building Mtce 11,895 11,895 0 0 0 11,895 Operating Expenses - PWO Building Mtce 31,760 31,760 23,032 0 0 31,760 Employee Costs - Admin OH Engineering Services 181 181 7,507 0 0 181 Operating Expenses - Admin OH Engineering Services 6,717 6,717 3,542 0 0 6,717 Employee Costs - Direct PWO Road Construction 1,875 1,875 0 0 0 1,875 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Road Construction 4,852 4,852 0 0 0 4,852 Operating Expenses - PWO Road Construction 9,651 9,651 7,580 0 0 9,651 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Road Maintenance 7,868 7,868 0 0 0 7,868 Operating Expenses - PWO Road Maintenance 36,860 36,860 28,452 0 0 36,860 Employee Costs - Coastal infrastructure 11,096 11,096 0 0 0 11,096 Operating Expenses - Coastal infrastructure 3,358 3,358 1,771 0 0 3,358 Operating Expenses - Admin OH Infrastructure Proje 8,396 8,396 4,428 0 0 8,396 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Infrastructure Proje 6,435 6,435 0 0 0 6,435 Employee Costs - Admin OH Parks Services 379 379 0 0 0 379 Operating Expenses - Admin OH Parks Services 160,518 160,518 123,220 0 0 160,518 Employee Costs - Direct PWO Parks Services 2,916 2,916 0 0 0 2,916 Employee Costs - Indirect PWO Parks Services 15,936 15,936 (7,391) 0 0 15,936 Operating Expenses - PWO Parks Services 6,168 6,168 4,996 0 0 6,168 Public Works Orverhead - Recovery Asset Services (1,626,950) (1,626,950) (260,462) (1,978) 2,436 (1,626,492) Public Works Orverhead - Recovery Engineering Serv (1,205,605) (1,205,605) (125,704) 30,528 (7,048) (1,182,125) Public Works Orverhead - Recovery Infrastructure P (766,395) (766,395) (119,009) 7,074 (54,897) (814,218) Public Works Orverhead - Recovery Park Services (3,266,609) (3,266,609) (677,333) (29,355) 26,116 (3,269,848) Employee Costs - Rapid Response Amen & Litt 0 0 8,770 0 0 0 Employee Costs - Customer & Corporate Support 3,827 3,827 0 0 0 3,827 Non Cash Expenses - Customer & Corporate Support 188,249 188,249 156,110 0 0 188,249 Operating Expenses - ICT Services 10,417 10,417 5,481 0 0 10,417 Non Cash Expenses - ICT Services 351,676 351,676 50,722 0 0 351,676 Employee Costs - Financial Services 1,740,678 1,740,678 440,005 0 0 1,740,678 Operating Expenses - Financial Services 549,524 549,524 (37,961) 0 0 549,524 Non Cash Expenses - Financial Services (33,180) (33,180) 264,889 0 0 (33,180) Employee Costs - Other Governance 2,355 2,355 0 0 0 2,355 Operating Expenses - Rockghm Outreach Youth Servic 2,519 2,519 1,328 0 0 2,519 Operating Expenses - Community Developmt Dir/Suppo 2,519 2,519 1,328 0 0 2,519 Non Cash Expenses - Jetties & Boat Ramps 317,139 317,139 0 0 0 317,139 Non Cash Expenses - Libraries Services Admin 2,276,152 2,276,152 180,581 0 0 2,276,152 Operating Expenses - Development Contribution Schm 442 442 233 0 0 442 Non Cash Expenses - Beach Patrols & Public Service 128,196 128,196 0 0 0 128,196 Operating Expenses - Secret Harbour Surf Life Savi 20,261 20,261 10,686 0 0 20,261 Employee Costs - Land & Development Infrastructure 10,430 10,430 0 0 0 10,430 Non Cash Expenses - Land & Development Infrastruct 76,410 76,410 14,191 0 0 76,410 Operating Expenses - Compliance & Emergency Liaiso 8,087 8,087 4,265 0 0 8,087 Non Cash Expenses - Admin OH EPS Directorate (990,084) (990,084) 5,349 0 0 (990,084) Employee Costs - Admin OH Asset Services 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 5,000 Operating Expenses - Admin OH Asset Services 8,289 8,289 5,984 0 0 8,289 Non Cash Expenses - Admin OH Assets Services (1,260,879) (1,260,879) 43,751 0 0 (1,260,879) Non Cash Expenses - PWO Building Mtce (108,915) (108,915) 17,530 0 0 (108,915) Non Cash Expenses - Admin OH Engineering Services (1,309,785) (1,309,785) 85,123 0 0 (1,309,785) Non Cash Expenses - PWO Road Construction 102,210 102,210 4,774 0 0 102,210 Non Cash Expenses - PWO Road Maintenance 28,280 28,280 12,810 0 0 28,280 Non Cash Expenses - Coastal infrastructure 34,844 34,844 8,521 0 0 34,844 Non Cash Expenses - Transport Engineering Services 3,532,466 3,532,466 473,759 0 0 3,532,466 Non Cash Expenses - Admin OH Infrastructure Projec (373,703) (373,703) 34,545 0 0 (373,703) Non Cash Expenses - Indirect PWO Infrastructure Pr (57,462) (57,462) 4,720 0 0 (57,462) Non Cash Expenses - Admin OH Parks Services (623,086) (623,086) 54,600 0 0 (623,086) Non Cash Expenses - Rec & Culture Parks Services 1,687,059 1,687,059 0 0 0 1,687,059 Non Cash Expenses - Depot/ Stores 192,161 192,161 7,626 0 0 192,161 Employee Costs - Litter Team (Busters) 1,618 1,618 0 0 0 1,618 Non Cash Expenses - Litter Team (Busters) 200,976 200,976 20,415 0 0 200,976 Operating Expenses - Admin Plant Operations Fleet 12,337 12,337 9,992 0 0 12,337 Non Cash Expenses - Road Plant Purchases 11,198 11,198 0 0 0 11,198 Non Cash Expenses - PWO Parks Services 326,788 326,788 58,657 0 0 326,788 Non Cash Expenses - SmartWatch 257,403 257,403 32,780 0 0 257,403 CLOSED Employee Costs - Building Mtce Empl/On-Cos 0 0 59 0 0 0 Operating Expenses - Other Unclassified 1,000,000 1,000,000 29,595 0 0 1,000,000 Employee Costs - Strategy and Communications 535 535 0 0 0 535 Operating Expenses - Strategy and Communications 7,320 7,320 3,860 0 0 7,320 Operating Expenses - Community Support Services 3,023 3,023 1,594 0 0 3,023 Non Cash Expenses - CEO Directorate & Support 0 0 10,801 0 0 0 Non Cash Expenses - Development Contribution Schem 0 0 7,026 0 0 0
Page 32 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Corporate Services Department Financial Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Income Operating Revenue - Emergency Services Levy (150,000) (150,000) 0 0 0 (150,000) Operating Revenue - Foreshores & Beaches (85,400) (85,400) (4,919) 0 0 (85,400) Operating Revenue - General Purpose Grant (6,472,042) (6,472,042) (596,706) 1,343,042 0 (5,129,000) Operating Revenue - Other General Purpose Income (1,290,000) (1,290,000) 62,037 0 0 (1,290,000) Operating Revenue - Streets, Rds & Bridges-Rd/Mtce (80,000) (80,000) (35,112) 0 0 (80,000) Operating Revenue - General Rate GRV (91,213,534) (91,213,534) (91,259,757) (46,223) 0 (91,259,757) Operating Revenue - General Rate UV (445,706) (445,706) (445,081) 625 0 (445,081) Operating Revenue - Interim Rates GRV (550,000) (550,000) (193,070) 0 0 (550,000) Operating Revenue - Other Rate Revenue (890,000) (890,000) (190,922) (9,256) 0 (899,256) Operating Revenue - Less Rates Write Off 2,000 2,000 600 3,000 0 5,000 Operating Revenue - Financial Services (5,000) (5,000) (5,016) 0 0 (5,000) Grand Total (98,495,064) (98,495,064) (91,515,287) 7,621,460 (33,393) (90,906,997)
Page 33 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Corporate Services Department Customer and Corporate Support
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Customer & Corporate Support 9,972,764 9,972,764 1,792,929 251,494 (33,076) 10,191,182 Capital Expense Computer - City Audio Visual Equipment 40,000 40,000 0 30,000 0 70,000 Computer - Replace DC2 Physical Servers 800,000 800,000 0 0 0 800,000 Computer - Expansion of Fibre Network 250,000 250,000 0 (10,000) 0 240,000 Computer - Rplc CCTV storage Infrast frm Stage 2 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 Computer - Replace RFID Infra Mary Davies 150,000 150,000 0 0 0 150,000 Computer - AV equipment replacement (Mary Davies) 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Computer - Switch Replacement 70,000 70,000 0 (46,511) (23,489) 0 Computer - Review and Replace RFID 73,000 73,000 0 0 27,000 100,000 Computer - Rangers Body Cameras 70,000 70,000 19,662 0 (36,587) 33,413 Computer - Follow me printing 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 Computer - SmartWatch CCTV replacement 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 Computer - Warnbro Recreation Centre CCTV 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 Computer - AV Equipment Replacement (Administratio 30,000 30,000 0 (30,000) 0 0 Computer - Network Structure Equipment/expansion 300,000 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 Computer - UPS Replacement 0 0 0 70,000 0 70,000 Operating Expense Operating Expenses - Customer & Corporate Support 402,131 402,131 59,268 1,000 0 403,131 Employee Costs - Customer & Corporate Support 1,674,406 1,674,406 410,384 0 0 1,674,406 Operating Projects - Business Systems 425,000 425,000 22,155 2,155 0 427,155 Employee Costs - ICT Services 1,746,347 1,746,347 373,474 0 0 1,746,347 Operating Expenses - ICT Services 3,165,500 3,165,500 906,269 250,000 0 3,415,500 Operating Projects - ICT Services 370,000 370,000 2,233 (15,000) 0 355,000 Income Operating Revenue - Customer & Corporate Support (3,620) (3,620) (516) (150) 0 (3,770) Grand Total 9,972,764 9,972,764 1,792,929 251,494 (33,076) 10,191,182
Page 34 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Corporate Services Department Waste Services
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Waste Collection Services (4,038,325) (4,038,325) (17,154,220) (59,000) (688) (4,098,013) Capital Expense Furn - Education Centre Upgrade 10,139 10,139 0 0 (688) 9,451 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Sanitation & Waste Services 855,571 855,571 188,205 8,000 0 863,571 Operating Expenses - Sanitation & Waste Services 14,520,743 14,520,743 3,151,931 8,000 0 14,528,743 Operating Expenses - Sanitation Other 1,255,839 1,255,839 299,979 0 0 1,255,839 Operating Projects - Sanitation & Waste Services 0 0 8,255 0 0 0 Employee Costs - Waste Education Centre 95,838 95,838 26,247 0 0 95,838 Operating Expenses - Waste Education Centre 74,045 74,045 2,693 0 0 74,045 Income Operating Revenue - Sanitation & Waste Services (20,201,000) (20,201,000) (20,196,154) (75,000) 0 (20,276,000) Operating Revenue - Sanitation Other (649,500) (649,500) (635,375) 0 0 (649,500) Landfill Services (3,670,735) (3,670,735) (3,692,268) 74,277 (10,186) (3,606,644) Capital Expense Misc Infra - Landfill Master Plan 2,719,985 2,719,985 0 0 19,801 2,739,786 Land Infra - Upgrade Cell Capping East Cells 8 10 360,930 360,930 6,030 149,057 (29,987) 480,000 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Millar Road Landfill Operations 1,170,530 1,170,530 318,034 8,000 0 1,178,530 Operating Expenses - Millar Road Landfill Operatio 9,122,111 9,122,111 397,492 4,000 0 9,126,111 Operating Expenses - Millar Rd Recycling Operation 562,852 562,852 61,774 0 0 562,852 Operating Expenses - Millar Rd Transfer Station 1,775,171 1,775,171 346,576 0 0 1,775,171 Income Operating Revenue - Millar Road Landfill Operation (15,540,314) (15,540,314) (3,850,232) (86,780) 0 (15,627,094) Operating Revenue - Millar Rd Recycling Operations (522,000) (522,000) (41,661) 0 0 (522,000) Operating Revenue - Millar Rd Transfer Station (3,320,000) (3,320,000) (930,280) 0 0 (3,320,000) Grand Total (7,709,060) (7,709,060) (20,846,488) 15,277 (10,874) (7,704,657)
Page 35 of 36 Attachment to CS-026/20
Directorate Legal Services and General Counsel Department (All)
Current Account Details Adopted Budget Amended Budget Actuals Carry Forwards New Budget Amendments
Director Legal Services and General Counsel 528,469 528,469 94,842 0 0 528,469 Operating Expense Employee Costs - Legal Services & General Counsel 443,974 443,974 92,295 0 0 443,974 Operating Expenses - Legal Services & General Coun 84,495 84,495 2,547 0 0 84,495 Grand Total 528,469 528,469 94,842 0 0 528,469
Page 36 of 36 Attachment 1 to GM-023/20
Public Comment – Community Submissions Submissions Officer Response A significant improvement to Golden Bay The State Underground Power Program (SUPP) is would be underground power. This would managed by Western Power – the cost of reduce the frequency of power outages undergrounding is shared between the State which is especially tough for the high Government, Western Power, Local Government number of elderly residents. I note there is Authorities (LGAs) and property owners. At this stage no mention of this in the 10 year plan. the City and Western Power do not have plans to extend the program in the City of Rockingham.
I also note that there is no mention of These concerns are covered in existing aspirations, environmental issues such as the and resulting Strategic Community Plans. Aspiration 3 proposed Waste 2 Energy Plant or Cape – Plan for Future Generations includes elements Peron or the preservation of the remaining which cover both environmental as waste and dunes. management issues, including: • Responsive planning and control of land use: Plan and control the use of land to meet the needs of the growing population, with consideration of future generations. • Alternative energy applications: Embrace new technology and apply alternative energy solutions to City facilities and service • Preservation and management of bushland and coastal reserves: Encourage the sustainable management and use of the City’s bushland and coastal reserves.
My first thought is don't do what As part of Aspiration 1 the City has developed a Mandurah have done and removed car Tourist Destination Strategy 2019-2024, which parking spaces. If you want Tourist they includes a total 24 action items across five Key will come by car. My second thought Strategic Elements including: would be the location of the visitor centre. 1. Destination marketing (targeting eco and adventure I'd like to see it on an entry road with tourism) Caravan Parking. Add to this encourage 2. Visitor servicing (face-to-face and digital) Caravan Parks to be built. There are a 3. Coastal development and activation LOT of Caravan eras and unless the road 4. Events activation (entertainment destination) network is Caravan friendly they will 5. Mid-tier MICE attraction. bypass. I'd also like to see the council Please click link to view realise there is more to the City than https://rockingham.wa.gov.au/forms-and- Rockingham itself. So have Community publications/your-city/our-vision/tourist-destination- events in various places. I remember strategy-2019-2024 going to Australia Day Fireworks at the Rockingham Foreshore and it was a total The City’s Public Parking Strategy seeks to strike the nightmare trying to get home. Perhaps a balance between providing enough parking at the traffic management plan may help. Rockingham Foreshore and making best use of the key public spaces. The Strategy recommends that there be no net reduction of public parking at the Foreshore and the monitoring parking usage so that if parking demand is not regularly satisfied, measure are put in place to address demand.
The City implements traffic management for all our major events Attachment 1 to GM-023/20
Submissions Officer Response There doesn't appear to be a strategic Under Aspiration 3 – Plan for the Future the strategic objective for the management of storm objective states that the City encourages the water run-off (gross pollutants, plastic and sustainable management and use of the City’s nutrients). It doesn't get a mention under bushland and coastal reserves. The Lake Richmond the management of reserves or Environmental Management Plan addresses action to sustainable waste management. Lake minimise the nutrient loads such as developing Richmond is threatened by nutrient run off strategies in association with the Water Corporation to and most of the ornamental drainage better manage stormwater discharged from the local ponds are overloaded with nutrients. The drainage network. The primary focus is on the Pond and surrounding beaches are reduction of waterborne litter and silt discharging into suffering from nutrient load and plastic the main drainage system and the receiving water washed in from storm water. What is the body. In this case Lake Richmond. The strategy plan to address this blight on our acknowledges that the management of stormwater environment requires an integrated approach involving the whole community.
City of Rockingham Attachment 2 to GM-023/20 Strategic Community Plan 2019-2029 Attachment 2 to GM-023/20 Attachment 2 to GM-023/20 Contents
Introduction 5
Our Strategic Framework 6
Developing the 2019-2029 Strategic Community Plan 8
Our Community’s Key Themes 9
Our Community’s Vision for the Future 10
Aspirations and Strategic Objectives 11
Community Plan Strategies 14
Measuring Our Performance 15
Last reviewed: October 2020 Attachment 2 to GM-023/20
Artist’s impression of Baldivis District Sporting Complex indoor recreation centre. Attachment 2 to GM-023/20
5 Introduction
At the beginning of 2019 the population of the City of Rockingham was about 140,000 people. By the beginning of 2023 there will be around 146,000 people living here.
The future is coming. Quickly. Every We sought comments and ideas from day our City grows a bit more, our many people - seniors, young people, residents’ needs change and the issues families, retirees, beach lovers, bush we need to deal with evolve. Our plan walkers, runners, cyclists, people with for dealing with the future of our city disability, conservationists, coffee needs to change, too. drinkers, home owners, tenants, business operators, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, new Every four years we do a comprehensive Australians, all sorts of Australians. review of our Strategic Community Plan, and create a new one that looks ahead over the next 10 years We sent out 10,000 workshop and considers the new factors, and invitations to people randomly the new expectations, that are now selected from all over the City of influencing our city. Rockingham, and we held a series of “Planning for the Future” workshops. We received over 500 suggestions The Community Plan is the product of from people who have a stake in the a long and broad engagement with future of our community. people from all walks of life from all sections of our community.
The valuable contributions from interested community members will help shape the direction of our city for the next 10 years, identifying four key aspirations which build on the groundwork done over the previous four years.
They are:
Actively pursue Grow and nurture 1 tourism and economic 2 community connectedness development and wellbeing
Deliver quality leadership Plan for future generations 3 4 and business expertise.
These aspirations reflect the community’s desire to create a welcoming, supportive, and friendly place where we make the most of our many assets, while keeping an eye on the needs of future generations who rely on our thoughtful stewardship to deliver a community that meets their needs as well. Attachment 2 to GM-023/20
6 Strategic FrameworkOur
The City is responsible for the provision and delivery of high quality services and facilities. Doing all the things the community expects, and prioritising them appropriately, requires a solid planning framework. The City has a Strategic Framework which helps us develop the capabilities to meet the needs of our community, and ensures we monitor our performance so we can respond to changes in circumstances during the life of the Strategic Community Plan. ur Community s ur Strategic Community The framework is built on the community’s Aspirations and Strategic Objectives in ision Aspirations Community Plan Plan Strategies the Community Plan, and activated through various plans and strategies. and Strategic The overarching The strategies that link The City also has an integrated Risk Management Framework which ensures b ectives plan to meet our our Community Plan that the possibility of risk is considered in everything we do. community's Aspirations with our Business Plan
Budgeted for and Delivered Through the Following Integrated planning and reporting gives local governments a framework for establishing local priorities and to link this information to operational functions. Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries.
Community Asset Service Delivery nfrastructure Plan anagement Plan Team Plans Planning for new City Managing and maintaining Planning for the day-to-day buildings, major roads and the City’s physical assets Services that we deliver to recreational facilities from creation to disposal the community (also at defined levels of service includes the Workforce Plan)
Corporate Business Plan Details the next 10 years incorporating major projects, asset management and service delivery The first year of the business plan becomes the annual budget.
Stage One of the Rockingham Beach Foreshore Revitalisation won two prestigious engineering awards at the 2020 Institute of Public Works is anagement Business Continuity anagement Engineers Australasia (IPWEA), WA awards. ey Driving Force Trac ing easurement of mplementation Stage One was an action in the Rockingham Beach Foreshore Master Plan, part of our aspiration to plan for future generations. Attachment 2 to GM-023/20
7 Strategic FrameworkOur