Socioeconomic Research Issues: Gulf of Mexico OCS Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Socioeconomic Research Issues: Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study MMS 2005-016 Workshop on Socioeconomic Research Issues for the Gulf of Mexico OCS Region February 2004 U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study MMS 2005-016 Workshop on Socioeconomic Research Issues for the Gulf of Mexico OCS Region February 2004 Editors Melanie McKay Copy Editor Judith Nides Production Editor Prepared under MMS Contract 1435-00-01-CA-31060 by University of New Orleans Office of Conference Services New Orleans, Louisiana 70814 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region March 2005 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Minerals Management Service (MMS) and the University of New Orleans, Office of Conference Services. This report has been technically reviewed by the MMS and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with MMS editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY Extra copies of this report may be obtained from the Public Information Office (Mail Stop 5034) at the following address: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Gulf of Mexico OCS Region Public Information Office (MS 5034) 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394 Telephone Numbers: (504) 736-2519 1-800-200-GULF CITATION This study should be cited as: McKay, M. and J. Nides, eds. 2005. Workshop on Socioeconomic Research Issues for the Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, February 2004. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, LA. OCS Study MMS 2005-016. 153 pp. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1, Workshop on Socioeconomic Research Issues for the Gulf of Mexico OCS Region........................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2, Session on Industry Trends and Dynamics .................................................................. 5 Chapter 3, Community-level Impacts of Oil and Gas Activity in the Gulf of Mexico Region.................................................................................................................. 13 Chapter 4, Cultural Impacts of Oil and Gas Activity in the Gulf of Mexico Region .................. 19 Chapter 5, Crosscutting Issues and Questions ............................................................................. 27 Appendix A, Participants............................................................................................................. 33 Appendix B, Agenda.................................................................................................................... 41 Appendix C, Proposed Studies and Study Topics ....................................................................... 43 Appendix D1, Legal Framework for Minerals Management Service Socioeconomic Studies in the Gulf of Mexico, Richard G. Hildreth......................................................... 69 Appendix D2, The History of the Offshore Industry in the Gulf of Mexico, Tyler Priest .......... 77 Appendix D3, Planning Challenges at the Bureau of Land Management, Rob Winthrop .......... 85 Appendix D4, Social Impact Assessment and Offshore Oil and Gas in the Gulf of Mexico, Harry Luton and Rodney E. Cluck ................................................................... 101 Appendix D5, The Cultural Context of Oil Development in California’s Coastal Region: Contrasting Community Responses during the Exuberant Era, Michael R. Adamson ...................................................................................................... 139 v LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE Figure 1: Gulf of Mexico Region............................................................................................... 102 Figure 2: General model. ........................................................................................................... 119 Figure 3: Gulf model.................................................................................................................. 120 Figure 4: County oil and gas fields by group............................................................................. 140 Figure 5: Crude Oil Production: Santa Barbara and Ventura Groups, 1876–1965. .................. 141 Figure 6: Crude Oil Production: Cuyama Valley and Santa Maria Groups, 1876–1965. .......... 142 Figure 7: Building Permits Issued, City of Ventura, California, 1921–1931. ........................... 145 vii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE Table 1: Differences between the SIA paradigm and Gulf realities. ......................................... 125 ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Minerals Management Service (MMS) thanks all participants in this workshop. Their active participation and enthusiasm were crucial in the success of this endeavor. In addition we would like to thank the following people who were unable to attend for their assistance in the preparation for the workshop: Dr. Shana Walton, Associate Director at the Deep South Regional Humanities Center, Tulane University; Mr. Joey Brackner M.A., Folklorist for the Alabama State Council on the Arts; and Dr. Tina Bucuvalas, Director of the Florida Folklife Program, Division of Historical Resources, Bureau of Historical Preservation, Department of the State. Each of them shared their knowledge and expertise on cultures and populations in the Gulf of Mexico Region and provided valuable contact information for other participants. The MMS thanks the following for their written and editorial contributions to this workshop report: Diane Austin, Kimberley Cook, Asha Luthra, Harry Luton, Diana Olien, Kristen Strellec, and Barbara Wallace. The University of New Orleans, Office of Conference Services, was the contractor responsible for the meeting coordination. We would especially acknowledge the patience and assistance of Patricia Arteaga and the students that assisted in each session. The staff of the Monteleone Hotel were accommodating to our requests. Support funding is provided through the MMS Environmental Studies Program. xi CHAPTER 1 WORKSHOP ON SOCIOECONOMIC RESEARCH ISSUES FOR THE GULF OF MEXICO OCS REGION A workshop on social and economic topics related to the oil and gas industry was hosted by the Minerals Management Service (MMS), Gulf of Mexico OCS Region (GOMR), February 3–5, 2004, at the Monteleone Hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana. Workshop Objective The objective was to provide guidance for studies planning for the next five years. The workshop began with the premise that much has been accomplished during the last decade of MMS socioeconomic research and that it is time to assess future directions for the program. The workshop sought advice, rather than consensus, on key questions, useful analytical approaches, and critical information needs. While the workshop was intended to identify specific information needs, MMS was seeking “strategic thinking” about issue selection, methodologies, and assessment goals. Issues related to specific socioeconomic modeling techniques were not addressed by this workshop. Workshop Structure and Schedule The two-and-a-half-day workshop was divided into three parts (see Appendix B, Agenda). The first half-day plenary session included all workshop attendees and consisted of introductions, presented papers and discussions designed to acquaint participants with the goals and procedures of the workshop. The paper, “Social Impact Assessment and Offshore Oil and Gas in the Gulf of Mexico” by Harry Luton and Rodney Cluck shows that standard approaches to social impact assessment that focus on individual projects and demographic effects are inappropriate for the Gulf’s oil industry. Richard Hildreth’s paper, “Legal Requirements for Social Impact Assessments under NEPA,” reviews court decisions regarding the adequacy of impact assessments and concludes that a great deal of flexibility in approach and content exists, particularly in the assessment of the “no action alternative.” Tyler Priest’s “The History of the Offshore Industry in the Gulf of Mexico” describes evolutionary changes within the offshore industry in the context of their onshore social and economic effects (see Appendix D, Presented Materials). The plenary session concluded with an organizational meeting for the breakout groups. The second half of the first day and the following day consisted of three concurrent breakout groups, of approximately 20 members each, organized around broad assessment categories: 1 • Industry Trends and Dynamics in the Gulf of Mexico Region, chaired by Kristen Strellec and co-chaired by Diana Olien, Ph.D. • Community-level Impacts of Oil and Gas in the Gulf of Mexico Region, chaired by Asha Luthra and co-chaired by Barbara Wallace • Cultural Impacts of Oil and Gas Activity in the Gulf of Mexico Region, chaired by H. B. Kimberley Cook, Ph.D. and co-chaired by Diane Austin, Ph.D. Each breakout group conducted
Recommended publications
  • Oregon Freight Intermodal Connector System Study
    Appendix September 26, 2017 prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94607 i Oregon Freight Intermodal Connector System Study Table of Contents 1.0 Appendix A - Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Stakeholder Survey .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Meeting with Portland Freight Stakeholders ............................................................................ 1-24 1.3 Technical Advisory Committee ................................................................................................ 1-33 1.4 Oregon Freight Advisory Committee ....................................................................................... 1-33 1.5 Supplemental Stakeholder Interviews/Survey ......................................................................... 1-33 2.0 Appendix B – Analysis of Existing NHS Intermodal Connectors .................................................. 2-1 2.1 Vehicle Classification Count Data .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Truck-Involved Crashes ............................................................................................................. 2-3 2.3 Pavement Condition Information ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Commission Meeting Minutes
    COMMISSIONERS RECORDED MEETINGS YEAR VOL. COMMENTS: THIS FILE WAS DIVIDED DUE TO ITS SIZE. THIS FILE HAS BEEN DIVIDED INTO PARTS. COMMISSIONERS OF THE LAND OFFICE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2009 AT 2:00 P.M. GOVERNOR'S LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM STATE CAPITOL BUILDING - SECOND FLOOR OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA Notice was posted online with the Secretary of State on October 23, 2008. Public notice was also posted on the Commissioners of the Land Office website and at the Commissioners of the Land Office and Governor's Large Conference Room of the State Capitol Building. PRESENT: Honorable Brad Henry, Governor and Chair Honorable Jari Askins, Lt. Governor and Vice-Chair Honorable Steve Burrage, State Auditor & Inspector and Member Honorable Terry Peach, President State Board of Agriculture and Member Honorable Sandy Garrett, State Superintendent of Public Instruction and Member CLO STAFF PRESENT: Mike Hunter, Secretary Janet Henthorn, Chief of Staff Sarah Evans, Executive Secretary Keith Kuhlman, Director of the Real Estate Management Division Brian Heanue, Director of the Accounting Division David Shipman, Director of the Minerals Management Division Jack Stinson, Acting Director of the Audit Division Phyllis Bolt, Investment Director Trey Ramsey, Information Systems Director Jim Dupre, Legal Division VISITORS: Terri Watkins, State Auditor & Inspector's Office Michelle Tilley Johnson, Lt. Governor's Office Mike Fina, Lt. Governor's Office Brad Clark, State Department of Education Julie Bisbee, The Oklahoman Jered Davidson, Lt. Governor's Office Shawn Ashley, E-Capitol.net Guy Hurst, OTC Commission Meeting Minutes 228 August 13, 2009 The meeting was called to order at 2:32 p.m., chaired by Governor Henry.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF UNITED KINGDOM By Harold R. Newman 1 As a result of a rather complex geologic history, the United Authority, which is authorized to license open pit and Kingdom has been well endowed with mineral resources. underground mines to the private sector subject to Metallic ore deposits were typically small and of relatively restrictions on size and the payment of royalty on the amount high grade. Mining of nonferrous minerals, particularly of coal produced. copper and tin, has been ongoing since the Bronze Age. Mine Most other mineral rights in Great Britain are privately production of nonferrous minerals has been declining for the owned. The exception is gold and silver, the rights to which past 20 years as deposits were depleted. Although the are vested in the Royal Family and are referred to as Crown exploitation of nonferrous minerals has become less Rights. A different situation regarding mineral rights applies significant, the processing of these minerals is the basis of a to Northern Ireland where, under the Mineral Development large and economically important industry. Because most ore Act (Northern Ireland), 1969, the right to work minerals and bodies have been exhausted, the industry requires imports to the right to license others to do so is vested in the state, as satisfy its metallurgical requirements. opposed to private ownership. The industrial minerals sector has provided a significant Currently, there is no national registry for mineral rights in base for expanding the extractive industries and, in recent the United Kingdom, except for hydrocarbons. This has years, represented a shift in balance from the metallic mineral created problems and is a matter of concern for the mining sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Z Eab Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 74-21,995
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mar 5 MERGED
    Volume 76 N No. 8 N Mar. 5, 2005 Court Material 578 The Oklahoma Bar Journal Vol. 76 — No. 8 — 3/5/2005 OFFICERS & BOARD OF GOVERNORS Michael D. Evans, President, Frederick William R. Grimm, President-Elect, Tulsa EVENTS CALENDAR Rick Bozarth, Vice President, Taloga Harry A. Woods Jr., Immediate MARCH Past President, Oklahoma City Stephen D. Beam, Weatherford 7 OBA Work, Life Balance Task Force Meeting; 12 p.m.; A. Camp Bonds Jr., Muskogee Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City and Tulsa County Bar Dietmar K. Caudle, Lawton Center, Tulsa; Contact: Melody Jester (405) 231-5484 J. William Conger, Oklahoma City OBA Alternative Dispute Resolution Section Meeting; 3 p.m.; Michael W. Hogan, McAlester Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City and Tulsa County Bar Jerome A. Holmes, Oklahoma City R. Victor Kennemer III, Wewoka Center, Tulsa; Contact: Daniel Woska (405) 235-1401 Steven R. Mackey, Tulsa 8 OBA Civil Procedure Committee Meeting; 3 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar Mike Mordy, Ardmore Center, Oklahoma City and Tulsa County Bar Center, Tulsa; Jon K. Parsley, Guymon Contact: Alison Cave (405) 272-9700 Robert B. Sartin, Tulsa Linda S. Thomas, Bartlesville Hudson-Hall-Wheaton Chapter of American Inns of Court; Luke Gaither, Henryetta, Chairperson, 5:30 p.m.; Fed. Bldg., 333 W. 4th Street, Tulsa; Contact: Leigh OBA/Young Lawyers Division Reaves at [email protected] or visit our Web site at www.hudsonhallwheaton.com BAR CENTER STAFF John Morris Williams, Executive Director; Robert J. Turner Inn of Court; 5:30 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Dan Murdock, General Counsel; Donita Bourns Oklahoma City; Contact: Lori Fagan (405) 609-5400 Douglas, Director of Educational Programs; 10 OBA Strategic Planning Committee Meeting; 1 p.m.; Oklahoma Carol A.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunity Performance Value
    2006 Annual Report Opportunity Performance Value Financial Highlights 1 Worldwide Operations 2 Letter to Shareholders 4 Financial Review 8 Operating Review 10 Corporate Staffs 24 Financial and Operating Results 30 Directors and Officers 112 Glossary 114 Our Theme: Who We Are 2006 Annual Report Opportunity — A high-quality ConocoPhillips is an international, integrated energy Opportunity portfolio of existing assets, company. It is the third-largest integrated energy promising major projects under company in the United States, based on market development worldwide, and capitalization, and oil and natural gas proved reserves investment in numerous new and production; and the second-largest refiner in Performance emerging businesses ensures the United States. Worldwide, of non-government- an opportunity-rich future for controlled companies, ConocoPhillips is the sixth- ConocoPhillips. Renewable largest proved reserves holder and the fifth-largest diesel fuel represents one such refiner. Value opportunity. Garry Bush ConocoPhillips is known worldwide for its (featured in the top photo) technological expertise in exploration and production, works with a team at the company’s Bartlesville, Okla., reservoir management and exploitation, 3-D seismic research facility to further the production and marketing technology, high-grade petroleum coke upgrading of renewable fuels in the United States. The company’s and sulfur removal. renewable diesel fuel technology is already in use in Europe. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, ConocoPhillips operates in more than 40 countries. The company Performance — Strong, reliable operating performance, has 38,400 employees worldwide and assets of delivered in a safe and environmentally responsible $165 billion. ConocoPhillips’ stock is listed on the manner, is paramount to ConocoPhillips’ success.
    [Show full text]
  • Exxonmobil Historical Collection: Photographs, 1873-1999
    EXXONMOBIL HISTORICAL COLLECTION: PHOTOGRAPHS, 1873-1999. Restricted access: Photographic prints are immediately available for use, but access to transparent media, which includes negatives, slides and transparencies, is restricted. Advanced notice is required for viewing these formats as well as prints stored together with negatives. Please contact the archivist for the ExxonMobil collection or a reference archivist to make arrangements to see these images. Copyright: Exxon Mobil Corporation retains copyright to all images created by the corporation and its predecessor and affiliated entities. Note to researchers: When requesting images from containers with the prefix 3rdFl, please include the range of images on the yellow call slip. For example, if you would like to see specific images in container 3rdFl/2.7 [p. 254 of this finding aid], you could write “New York – General thru Brooklyn Refinery” on the call slip. Cite as: ExxonMobil Historical Collection, Dolph Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin. ______________________________________________________________________________ HISTORICAL SKETCH: See Historical Sketch in the main finding aid for the ExxonMobil Historical Collection. SCOPE AND CONTENTS: See Scope and Contents in the main finding aid for the ExxonMobil Historical Collection. Scope notes for individual subseries are included below. ______________________________________________________________________________ ARRANGEMENT: This finding aid contains the following series: Mobil Corporation: Series
    [Show full text]
  • Revista De Economia Política Internacional
    1 Revista de Economia Política Internacional Oikos volume 19, n. 1 • 2020 Rio de Janeiro • Semestral ISSN 1808-0235 | ISSN VIRTUAL 2236-0484 1. Economia Política - Periódicos 2. Economia brasileira - América Latina Em parceria com / In partnership with instituto de economia Pós-graduação em Economia Política Internacional expediente Rio de Janeiro | Volume 19, n.1 • 2020 Editor | Editor Raphael Padula (PEPI/UFRJ) Chefe da Equipe Editorial | Editorial Team Head Fernanda Pacheco de Campos Brozoski Equipe Editorial | Editorial Team (PEPI-IE/UFRJ) Amanda Orguim Simioni | Ben Lian Deng | Bernardo Salgado Rodrigues | Caroline Rocha Travassos Colbert | Caroline Yukari Miaguti | Dominique Marques de Souza | Felipe Gusmão Carioni Fernandes | Guilherme Celestino Souza Santos | Ítalo Barreto Poty | João Miguel Villas-Bôas Barcellos | Laura Emilse Brizuela | Mario Afonso Lima | Matheus de Freitas Cecílio | Paulo Vitor Sanches Lira | Pedro Allemand Mancebo Silva | Pedro José Aquino Martinez | Simone Kawakami Gonçalves Costa | Vitor de Paula Motta Sanchez Conselho Editorial | Editorial Board Andrés Rivarola Puntigliano (Universidade de Estocolmo) | Antônio Carlos Ma- cedo e Silva (IE/UNICAMP) | Carlos Lessa (em memória) | Carlos Medeiros (PEPI-IE/UFRJ) | Carlota Perez (Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia) | Darc Costa (FEDERASUR) | Eric Helleiner (Universidade de Waterloo, Cana- dá) | Erik S. Reinert (Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia) | Franklin Serra- no (PEPI-IE/UFRJ) | Ha-Joon Chang (Cambridge University, UK) | Jan Kregel (University
    [Show full text]