DOCSLIB.ORG

Will the Islamists Or Modernists Win the Moroccan Elections? Publish Date: 04/10/2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Will the Islamists Or Modernists Win the Moroccan Elections? Publish Date: 04/10/2016 Artical Name : Test of Popularity Artical Subject : Will the Islamists or Modernists win the Moroccan elections? Publish Date: 04/10/2016 Auther Name: Dr. Saeed Al-Sadiqi Subject : The parliamentary elections in Morocco on October 7 will witness 6,992 candidates competing for 395 seats in the country¶s House of Representatives. It is the second election to the lower house since protests rocked the country in 2011, prompting King Mohammed VI to draft a new constitution that neutralized the protest movement and gave more powers to the elected government.The elections represent a test for the popularity of the Islamist Justice and Development Party (PJD) and its ability to preserve the support that it acquired in the 2011 elections, which enabled the party to lead the Moroccan government for five years. The experience of governing was not easy for the PJD; the government faced several crises that almost toppled it, notably when the Independence Party withdrew from the coalition in July 2013.The latest electoral test follows local elections in September 2015, the results of which gave some indication of the direction the parliamentary polls may take. The competition was most intense between the PJD and the opposition Authenticity and Modernity Party (PAM), a centrist group close to the royal palace. The role of other parties is expected to be limited to filling seats in the next coalition government that the winning party will form in the House of Representatives.Fragile CoalitionsThe current election campaign has been characterized by an absence of powerful alliances of major parties that have postponed taking decisions regarding the formation of coalitions until after the election results. That is unlike the 2011 elections, when a broad coalition of eight parties, the Coalition for Democracy or the Group of Eight (G8), formed before the polls.The G8 was made up of eight parties with a range of ideological and political outlooks: the PAM, the National Rally of Independents, the Popular Movement, the Constitutional Union Party, the Party of Renaissance and Virtue, the Labour Party, the Socialist Party and the Green Left Party. The coalition disintegrated after the election results were announced, resulting in its loss.But in the current elections, there were no such influential coalitions prior to voting. The most important alliance announced during party meetings and statements to the press is between the PJD and the Party of Progress and Socialism. But these are only statements of intent and do not relate to the elections themselves but rather to what comes after announcing the results. The leaders of the two parties have said they agreed to continue their coalition whether in government - if they win a majority - or in opposition, in the case that the PJD is not ranked first in the polls.There is another electoral coalition between two small parties, the Covenant Party and the Party for Renewal and Justice, which presented a joint list. However, that coalition will not have any noticeable impact on the results of the elections, nor will it affect the political scene, due to the weak electoral base of the two parties. On the other hand, the two big parties, the PJD and the PAM, have repeatedly ruled out going into coalition together to form the next government. That notwithstanding, everything is possible, meaning that the next coalition will form around one of those two poles.Struggle of the major partiesThe competition in this election is limited to three parties namely, the PJD, the PAM, and the Independence Party. The PJD is striving to turn the poll into a referendum on the current government, and launched its campaign with a series of popular gatherings in the major cities. It aspires to renew confidence to hold responsibility for the next administration. There have been predictions that the party will hold on to its current position, as it still retains a large electoral base that may mean it can repeat its success of 2011.PAM, founded primarily to counter the Islamists, is working for an electoral victory by being an alternative to the PJD. Despite the fact that the state has bet on the PAM as a way of attaining a political balance and curb the PJD to stop it broadening the gap between itself and the other parties, it is still possible that the state¶s need for social stability will at this stage necessitate not pushing the PAM to the top of the House of Representatives and leadership of the next government.The Independence Party, which is hoping to lead the next government, has little chance of coming first in the elections, as its electoral base has somewhat retreated and it has undergone internal disruptions since its general conference in Summer 2012. But it is likely to be able to take part in the next government and obtain important ministerial posts, especially in light of what appears to be a rapprochement between it and the PJD in recent months.Regarding Centrist parties, they include the Popular Movement Party, the National Rally of Independents and the Progress and Socialism Party. Despite the fact that they agree on a joint strategy to strengthen their political positions to win influential ministerial posts in a future government, they differ in terms of the structure of the coalitions they are proposing.If the Progress and Socialism Party resort to supporting the PJD and oppose the strategy of the PAM, then both the smaller parties, which are taking part in the current government, would prefer to leave the door open to all options according to the election results reveal. It is entirely possible that they will take part in the next government, regardless of the outcome of the elections; i.e. whether the PJD or the PAM becomes the largest party and is charged with forming a new administration. In terms of policy, however, both parties are closer to the PAM.Symbolic participation by Salafists Salafists¶integration into Moroccan political scene has stirred debate and political controversy in the weeks running up to the election. But this controversy does not reflect the size of their participation in the elections, which is very small. Although one of the country's most prominent Salafists is in the list of the Independence Party in the city of Fez, he is unlikely to win a seat as he is second on the electoral list of a party that saw its popularity plummet at local elections in 2015. The PJD tried to put forward a Salafist preacher in Morocco, Hammad al-Kabbaj, but local authorities rejected his candidacy. Apart from them, no prominent Salafist is likely to win a single seat in the House of Representatives.Despite the fact that the Party of Renaissance and Virtue put 10/1/2021 11:40:39 PM 1 / 2 forward 20 Salafist candidates, some of whom come first on local party lists, their chances of reaching parliament are extremely limited due to the party¶s small electoral base. Furthermore, the limited number of Salafists who are taking part in the elections and the fact that they are standing for various parties, none of whom have much popularity, and therefore their limited chances of winning seats, means that the debate about the Salafists¶participation in - or insertion into - Moroccan political life has been somewhat exaggerated. A few prominent members of this community have taken part, but the next House of Representatives will probably not include a single well-known Salafist face.Therefore, it appears that the parties who open their arms to the Salafist community are first and foremost trying to benefit from the votes of the community and those who sympathize with it, rather than giving it real representation in the next House of Representatives. With the exception of Al-Kabbaj, whose candidacy was rejected by local authorities and who may well have won, given his popularity in his constituency, the other Salafist candidates have almost no chance of winning seats as they do not top their party lists or because they are representing small parties.The third optionA group of Moroccan leftists set up a Coalition in 2014 named the Federation of the Democratic Left, consisting of three parties: the Socialist Democratic Vanguard Party, the National Congress Party, and the United Socialist Party. The Federation came about in its most recent manifestation after years of discussions about the framework of the Democratic Left Alliance, which was formed in 2007 to strengthen the ranks of the left in the political scene.The left presents itself in these elections as a third option, meaning it is different from the Islamists in the PJD but also distinct from the PAM. Despite using slogans that differ from those of other political parties, and enjoying the support of a significant number of the educated elite, especially those on the left, the Federation has not yet been able to turn into a mass movement, and it has little electoral strength. It is, therefore, unlikely to make significant headway in the elections. There are several reasons for the party's weakness, most importantly is its lack of unity, the absence of a charismatic leader and its inability so far to reach out to voters who form the electoral ³treasury´of the major parties, a fact that significantly limits its ambitions.Coalitions after the electionsSeveral indicators, especially the results of the local elections of September 2015 and opinion polls taken in recent months, indicate that the PJD will come first in these elections, giving it a second term in government. Concerning possible coalitions, the closest parties to the PJD at this point are parties already in government, notably the Party of Progress and Socialism and the Popular Movement Party.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Labour Party and the Idea of Citizenship, C. 193 1-1951
    The Labour Party and the Idea of Citizenship, c. 193 1-1951 ABIGAIL LOUISA BEACH University College London Thesis presented for the degree of PhD University of London June 1996 I. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the development and articulation of ideas of citizenship by the Labour Party and its sympathizers in academia and the professions. Setting this analysis within the context of key policy debates the study explores how ideas of citizenship shaped critiques of the relationships between central government and local government, voluntary groups and the individual. Present historiographical orthodoxy has skewed our understanding of Labour's attitude to society and the state, overemphasising the collectivist nature and centralising intentions of the Labour party, while underplaying other important ideological trends within the party. In particular, historical analyses which stress the party's commitment from the 1930s to achieving the transition to socialism through a strategy of planning, (of industrial development, production, investment, and so on), have generally concluded that the party based its programme on a centralised, expert-driven state, with control removed from the grasp of the ordinary people. The re-evaluation developed here questions this analysis and, fundamentally, seeks to loosen the almost overwhelming concentration on the mechanisms chosen by the Labour for the implementation of policy. It focuses instead on the discussion of ideas that lay behind these policies and points to the variety of opinions on the meaning and implications of social and economic planning that surfaced in the mid-twentieth century Labour party. In particular, it reveals considerable interest in the development of an active and participatory citizenship among socialist thinkers and politicians, themes which have hitherto largely been seen as missing elements in the ideas of the interwar and immediate postwar Labour party.
    [Show full text]
  • Party Politics and Elections in Morocco
    The Middle East Institute Policy Brief No. 29 May 2010 Party Politics and Elections in Morocco By Mohamed Daadaoui This Policy Brief examines party politics and limited elections in Morocco. Politi- cal parties in Morocco do not contest the regime’s traditional sources of power and embrace the monarchy’s religious status as an integral part of the political identity of Morocco. The monarchy’s religious authority and its use of rituals of power impede the ability of political parties to mobilize and to penetrate Moroccan society, and force them to adopt positional strategies in limited elections. The regime has also promulgated new palace parties, such as the Party of Modernity and Authenticity, to placate political challenges from opposition parties. For more than 60 years, the Middle East Institute has been dedicated to increasing Americans’ knowledge and understanding of the re- gion. MEI offers programs, media outreach, language courses, scholars, a library, and an academic journal to help achieve its goals. The views expressed in this Policy Brief are those of the author; the Middle East Institute does not take positions on Middle East policy. Party Politics and Elections in Morocco In July 1999, King Hassan II died after 38 years on the throne. His son, King Muham- mad VI, assumed office with the same broad constitutional powers, including the ap- pointment and dismissal of cabinet ministers, vetoes of parliamentary legislation, and the dissolution of Parliament. Unlike his father, however, Muhammad VI has launched many reforms that were shelved during Hassan’s reign. The reforms include codifying a body of law, promoting the democratic process, encouraging economic and fiscal reforms, and granting more civil rights for Moroccans.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamist Women As Candidates in Elections: a Comparison of the Party of Justice and Development in Morocco and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt
    Islamist Women As CandidatesDie Welt des In Islams Elections 57 (2017) 329-359 329 International Journal for the Study of Modern Islam brill.com/wdi Islamist Women as Candidates in Elections: A Comparison of the Party of Justice and Development in Morocco and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt Katarína Škrabáková Comenius University in Bratislava, Department of Political Science [email protected] Abstract This paper examines the legislative recruitment of women from conservative Islamist parties. It questions the common assumption that generally all Islamist parties are equally hostile to political participation and representation of women. For this pur- pose, two of the electorally most successful Islamist groups in the MENA region are compared, namely the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and its Moroccan offshoot, the Party of Justice and Development (PJD). The article seeks an explanation for diverg- ing trends in female candidacy between these conservative religious movements, using the traditional supply and demand model of candidate selection. It argues that the less centralized and the more institutionalized parties (as is the case with the PJD) seem to be better equipped to facilitate women’s candidacy than the more oligarchic ones (the MB). In order to fully grasp the reasons behind the diverging trends in the nomination of female candidates from both Islamist parties, cultural factors are scrutinized as well. The article highlights the limits of the supply and demand model of candidate selection, which cannot explain instances of unexpected change in recruitment strategies based on external interference. Furthermore, it does not provide us the means to assess the impact of individual candidates’ ‘feminist credentials’ on overall female representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Analysis of Morocco
    Conflict analysis of Morocco January 2014 Anna Louise Strachan About this report This report provides a short synthesis of some of the most recent, high quality literature on the topic of conflict in Morocco. It aims to orient policymakers to the key debates and emerging issues. It was prepared (in December 2013) for the UK Government’s Department for International Development, © DFID Crown Copyright 2014. The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of GSDRC, its partner agencies or DFID. Expert contributors Dr Lise Storm - University of Exeter Dr Jonathan Hill – King’s College London Dr Michael Willis – St Antony’s College, University of Oxford Dr Alice Wilson – Homerton College, University of Cambridge Suggested citation Strachan, A.L. (2014). Conflict analysis of Morocco. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham. This paper is one of a series of four conflict analyses on north-west Africa. The others are: Hinds, R. (2014). Conflict analysis of Tunisia. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham. Rao, S. (2014). Conflict analysis of Mauritania. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham. Strachan, A.L. (2014). Conflict analysis of Algeria. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham. About GSDRC GSDRC is a partnership of research institutes, think-tanks and consultancy organisations with expertise in governance, social development, humanitarian and conflict issues. We provide applied knowledge services on demand and online. Our specialist research team supports a range of international development agencies, synthesising the latest evidence and expert thinking to inform policy and practice. GSDRC, International Development Department, College of Social Sciences University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK www.gsdrc.org [email protected] 2 GSDRC Conflict analysis of Morocco Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Morocco: Assessment Report for Political Parties and Party Systems
    Morocco: Assessment Report for Political Parties and Party Systems Barry Ames Louis A. Picard Miguel Carreras University of Pittsburgh August 19, 2010 This study is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the University of Pittsburgh and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Table of Contents 1 POLITICAL CONTEXT..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 POLITICAL TRENDS AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS........................................................................................................3 1.1.1 The Nature of the Regime ........................................................................................................................3 1.2 THE SOCIO‐ECONOMIC CONTEXT.............................................................................................................................4 1.3 THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................7 1.4 EXECUTIVE POWER ...............................................................................................................................................7 1.5 THE LEGISLATURE .................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle East Institute Policy Brief No
    The Middle East Institute Policy Brief No. 29 May 2010 Party Politics and Elections in Morocco By Mohamed Daadaoui This Policy Brief examines party politics and limited elections in Morocco. Politi- cal parties in Morocco do not contest the regime’s traditional sources of power and embrace the monarchy’s religious status as an integral part of the political identity of Morocco. The monarchy’s religious authority and its use of rituals of power impede the ability of political parties to mobilize and to penetrate Moroccan society, and force them to adopt positional strategies in limited elections. The regime has also promulgated new palace parties, such as the Party of Modernity and Authenticity, to placate political challenges from opposition parties. For more than 60 years, the Middle East Institute has been dedicated to increasing Americans’ knowledge and understanding of the re- gion. MEI offers programs, media outreach, language courses, scholars, a library, and an academic journal to help achieve its goals. The views expressed in this Policy Brief are those of the author; the Middle East Institute does not take positions on Middle East policy. Party Politics and Elections in Morocco In July 1999, King Hassan II died after 38 years on the throne. His son, King Muham- mad VI, assumed office with the same broad constitutional powers, including the ap- pointment and dismissal of cabinet ministers, vetoes of parliamentary legislation, and the dissolution of Parliament. Unlike his father, however, Muhammad VI has launched many reforms that were shelved during Hassan’s reign. The reforms include codifying a body of law, promoting the democratic process, encouraging economic and fiscal reforms, and granting more civil rights for Moroccans.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto Project Dataset List of Political Parties
    Manifesto Project Dataset List of Political Parties [email protected] Website: https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/ Version 2018b from December 7, 2018 Manifesto Project Dataset - List of Political Parties Version 2018b 1 Coverage of the Dataset including Party Splits and Merges The following list documents the parties that were coded at a specific election. The list includes the name of the party or alliance in the original language and in English, the party/alliance abbreviation as well as the corresponding party identification number. In the case of an alliance, it also documents the member parties it comprises. Within the list of alliance members, parties are represented only by their id and abbreviation if they are also part of the general party list. If the composition of an alliance has changed between elections this change is reported as well. Furthermore, the list records renames of parties and alliances. It shows whether a party has split from another party or a number of parties has merged and indicates the name (and if existing the id) of this split or merger parties. In the past there have been a few cases where an alliance manifesto was coded instead of a party manifesto but without assigning the alliance a new party id. Instead, the alliance manifesto appeared under the party id of the main party within that alliance. In such cases the list displays the information for which election an alliance manifesto was coded as well as the name and members of this alliance. 2 Albania ID Covering Abbrev Parties No. Elections
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties in MENA
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository Political Parties in MENA: their Functions and Development Raymond Hinnebusch University of St Andrews Abstract This article provides an overview of the development of parties and party systems in the MENA region from early oligarchic pluralism to the mass single party systems of the populist era and the limited multi-party experiments of the 1990s era of political liberalization. The survey shows how parties develop in parallel with the deepening of politicization and become nearly-indispensable adjuncts in the construction of political order. The article then examines parties in the post-2010 period, with case studies of Turkey, Egypt, and Tunisia demonstrating how very different configurations of party development dramatically impact on regime trajectories, ranging from democratization to hybrid regimes. Political parties are often said to matter little in the Middle East and North Africa, where monarchs or the military tend to subordiante or marginalize parties.. Moreover, with a disproportionate number of no-party, one party or dominant party states, the region suffers from a deficit of the party competition associated with democracy. Bill and Springborg offered a “political culture” explanation for this: the continued viability of traditional solidarity groups (kinship groups, shillas) and of clientalism and tribalism as alternative mechanisms of elite-mass linkage, both of which deter and colonize more inclusive
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of the Parliamentary Elections in Morocco (25 November 2011)
    Doc. 12832 23 January 2012 Observation of the parliamentary elections in Morocco (25 November 2011) Report Bureau of the Assembly Rapporteur: Mr Tomáš JIRSA, Czech Republic, European Democrat Group Contents 1. Introduction 2. Political context and legal framework 3. Administration of elections, voter lists and candidate registration 4. Election campaigning and media environment 5. Polling day 6. Conclusions Appendix 1: Programme for observing the parliamentary elections in Morocco Appendix 2: Statement by the PACE observer mission 1. Introduction 1. In response to the letter of invitation sent by Mr Driss El Yazami, President of the Moroccan National Human Rights Council, the Bureau of the Assembly decided, at its meeting on 8 September 2011, to set up an ad hoc committee comprising 20 members to observe the parliamentary elections to be held on 25 November 2011. The Bureau also authorised a pre-election visit by five members – one from each political group – who were also members of the ad hoc committee. 2. On 4 October 2004, a co-operation agreement was signed between the Parliamentary Assembly and the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). In keeping with that agreement, the Bureau of the Assembly invited a member of the Venice Commission to join the ad hoc committee as an adviser. 3. The membership of the ad hoc committee, based on the proposals of the Assembly's political groups, was as follows: Mr Tomáš JIRSA, Head of Delegation Group of the European People's Party (EPP/CD) Mladen GRUJI Ć Serbia Jan KA ŹMIERCZAK Poland Yves POZZO di BORGO France Mehmet TEKELIO ĞLU Turkey F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | [email protected] | Tel: +33 3 88 41 2000 | Fax: +33 3 88 41 2733 Doc.
    [Show full text]