DOCSLIB.ORG

Coronagraphy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coronagraphy Coronagraphy Olivier Guyon ([email protected]) http://www.naoj.org/staff/guyon Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics University of Arizona Subaru Telescope National Astronomical Obs. of Japan 1 Outline 1. Scientific motivation(1) 2. Introduction to Coronagraphy 3. Coronagraph concepts(2) 4. Coronagraphy theoretical limits 5. Wavefront control for Coronagraphs, PSF calibration 6. Current status. Recent lab results, missions (1) This lecture discusses stellar coronagraphy. Science and techniques for solar coronagraphy, or coronagraphy on other non-stellar sources (Planets, AGNs, etc...) are not discussed. (2) Mostly for reference. 52 slides describe coronagraph concepts. We will go through these slides very quickly. 2 1. Scientific motivation 3 Exoplanets How many planets around other stars ? How do they form, evolve ? Mass, size, composition ? Rocky planets with atmospheres ? What is the atmosphere composition ? Weather, rotation period ? Could have life evolved on other planets ? Intelligent life somewhere else ? What does the general public think about imaging exoplanets ? (quotes from http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/02/nasas-new-world.html) “What an amazing idea - to stay at the fuzzy image of another world with oceans and continents and perhaps even clouds! And what if it did discover O2, methane or another bio marker? How would this world be changed to have proof - visual proof at that (best kind for a visual-oriented primate) - that there is other life in the universe? Well worth $3bill. Maybe Bill Gates or another billionaire could be convinced to pay up some! :-)” “Maybe, we could stop wasting money on project like this, and spend it on more important issues? We have already discovered other life forms, countless of documents explain they came and landed, and were shot at, and downed and retrieved...” 5 Key science goals Ground-based imaging (Near-IR, with Adaptive Optics) • Planet Detection: Most sensitive to outer young massive planets (complementary to Radial Velocity, astrometry, transits) -> important for testing planetary formation models • Characterization of planets and disks: • Study planet formation by imaging both disks and planets • Spectroscopy • Achieving high contrast close to the star is key to: • constrain mass/age/luminosity relationship (cooling rate) with overlap with RV • capture reflected light: large sample of “old” planet, many known from RV • increase sample size (currently <10, probably most of them are “exceptions” to the rule) Space-based imaging (Visible, extremely high contrast) • Characterization (spectroscopy) of Earth-mass (and above) planets in habitable zone • Simultaneous imaging of exozodi cloud, massive and rocky planets Ground-based near-IR imaging examples (without coronagraph !) Chauvin et al. 2004 Marois et al. 2008 Lagrange et al. 2009 7 Measurements Habitable exoplanet characterization Modeling / Theory with direct imaging Direct imaging (Visible or IR) Radial Astrometry time planet Spectra / exozodi Velocity photometry position colors map & polarization systems of other of other inclination ? albedo (VIS) ? dynamical Direct imagingDirect Eff. temp (IR) ? model phase function atmosphere variation ? (low mass stars) (low Transit spectra ? spectra Transit Atmosphere Rotation Orbit Mass Radius composition period & structure Asteroid exozodi measurements on systems other belt observations System (nulling, ALMA ...) (nulling, tidal surface temperature, dynamical forces pressure & composition ? impact stability frequency Planet overall structure statistics Transit & Transit (Iron, Rock, Water, Atmosphere) Habitability microlensing microlensing Planet formation volcanism models Spectroscopy : biomarkers • Venus & Mars spectra look very similar, dominated by CO2 • Earth spectra has CO2 + O3 + H2O + O2 + CH4 – Together, these gases indicate biological activity 10 Red edge spectral feature • Red edge in Earth spectra due to plants, and remotely detectable 11 Near-IR Earth spectra • Water is easiest to detect • CO2, CH4, O2 Turnbull et al 2006 Kasting 2004 Earthshine Text Turnbull et al. 2006 Characterization (spectra) of habitable planets Coronagraphy ideally suited for characterizing habitable planets around Sun-like stars (maybe also the best stars for habitability) Coronagraphy / nulling (VIS) M K G F A B - small angular separation - High contrast requires large telescope - few targets, far away - star/planet diameter ratio larger -> planets are faint - planet is faint in visible Coronagraphy / nulling (IR) M K G F A B small angular separation few targets, far away requires large baseline -> planets are faint Transit spectroscopy M K G F A B - insufficient SNR - transit probability < 1 - low transit probability <<1 - limited SNR - large period 14 2. Introduction to Coronagraphy 15 Coronagraphy • Coronagraph role is to block starlight and let as much planet light as possible through the system • Most coronagraph designs are a painful tradeoff between coronagraphic rejection and throughput, inner working angle, angular resolution • R&D in coronagraph has been extremely active in the last 10-15 yrs • Many good coronagraph designs now exist • The theoretical limit imposed by fundamental physics is well understood and approached by a few concepts • Coronagraph performance achieved in labs is already much beyond the requirements of ground-based systems, and at or close to requirements for space mission Coronagraphy language Inner Working Angle (IWA), unit = lambda/D How close can a faint source be imaged from the star. IWA is usually defined as the 50% peak throughput point (where the source throughput is 50% of the maximum throughput) Contrast (example: 1e10 contrast, or 1e-10 contrast) What is usually quoted is the raw contrast (not the detection contrast). Raw contrast = ratio of local surface brightness to peak PSF surface brightness Null order (example: 4th order null coronagraph) Quantifies coronagraph throughput as a function of angular separation close to the optical axis. Higher order = more immune to residual pointing error and stellar angular size (but larger IWA) Why coronagraphy ? Coronagraph can only remove known & static diffraction pattern BUT: - static & known diffraction can be removed in the computer - coronagraphs don’t remove speckles due to WF errors Fundamental reasons: (1) Photon Noise (2) Coherent amplification between speckles and diffraction pattern Practical reasons: (3) Avoid detector saturation / bleeding (4) Limit scattering in optics -> “stop light as soon as you can” (5) Difficult to subtract 2 large quantities to look for small18 residuals Coherent amplification between speckles and diffraction pattern Final image = PSF diffraction (Airy) + speckle halo This equation is true in complex amplitude, not in intensity. I = |A|^2 + 2|AB| + |B|^2 Intensity image will have product term -> speckles are amplified by the PSF diffraction. IF Airy>speckles, then coronagraph is required 19 Aime & Soummer 2004 When is a coronagraph required ? Coronagraphs serve no purpose if dynamic speckle halo is > diffraction -> Very important to keep in mind to avoid over-designing the coronagraph, as this usually would mean giving up something (usually throughput) “Side effects” of coronagraphs : - (Usually) requires very good pointing. Risk of low order aberrations (for example pointing) creating additional scattered light in the region of interest - data interpretation & analysis can be challenging (especially at inner working angle) - Astrometry more difficult (solutions exist) 20 Geometrical optics Coronagraph 21 Geometrical optics coronagraph Geometrical problem: To work at diffraction limit of the telescope, mask needs to be very large and far from telescope (mask should be unresolved by telescope, and needs to be larger than telescope size) + diffraction problem (Arago spot) Solution: put the mask at a plane conjugated to infinity INSIDE the telescope = focal plane BUT: diffraction problem again (Airy pattern) ! Stellar coronagraphy is a diffraction problem, not a geometrical one. 23 Fourier Optics Most coronagraphs place masks in pupil and/or focal planes. Fourier transform links the complex amplitude in these planes. P0 F0 P1 F1 P0 = P x PM0 P = telescope pupil c.a. F0 = FT(P x PM0) x FM PM0 = pupil mask P1 = LM x invFT( FT(P x PM0) x FM ) P0 = coronagraph pupil c.a. F1 = FT( LM x invFT( FT(P x PM0) x FM )) FM = focal plane mask F0 = focal plane c.a. product (x) <-(Fourier Transform)-> convolution (⊗) LM = Lyot mask P1 = Lyot plane c.a. F0 = FT(P) ⊗ FT(PM0) x FM F1 = final focal plane c.a. P1 = LM x ((P x PM0) ⊗ FT(FM)) F1 = FT(LM) ⊗ ((FT(P) ⊗ FT(PM0)) x FM) 24 Fourier Optics & mathematical tools In Lyot-type configuration, the coronagraph design must minimize: P1 = LM x invFT( FT(P x PM0) x FM ) P1 = LM x ((P x PM0) ⊗ FT(FM)) Several mathematical approached: - tune PM0 (pupil mask) Prolate spheroidal functions are key to this optimization, as they are the eigenfunctions of the above equation. Soummer et al. 2003A&A...397.1161S - Tune FM (focal plane mask) Band-limited masks can be used to solve the equation, as their Fourier transform is bounded within a domain the pupil. Kuchner & Traub 2002ApJ...570..900K 25 3. Coronagraph concepts 26 Lyot Coronagraph 27 Lyot Coronagraph figure from Lyot project website Improvement on the Lyot concept Part I: Amplitude masks In the Lyot Coronagraph, some light is leaking. The smaller the focal plane mask, the stronger the light leaks are. ! Apodized Pupil Lyot Coronagraph !!!!!!APLC Soummer et al. 2003, Abe et al. Modify (amplitude apodization)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nancy Grace Roman Telescope Sell Sheet
    NANCY GRACE ROMAN SPACE TELESCOPE The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is designed to provide data that might settle some of the most enduring mysteries of the universe – dark energy, dark matter, exoplanets and undiscovered galaxies. ROMAN SPACE TELESCOPE MISSION L3HARRIS’ ROLE ROMAN DETAILS When it launches in the mid-2020s on a L3Harris is responsible for some of the > Mission duration is approximately mission planned for five years, Roman most important tasks to create the tele- five years will survey wide areas of space with a scope, including refinishing the primary > Expected launch in the mid-2020s field of view much larger than the Hubble mirror. L3Harris is creating hardware Space Telescope or the James Webb to accommodate and interact with the > Primary mirror diameter Space Telescope. Those predecessors two instruments on the telescope, the 2.4 meters take detailed views of smaller areas of Wide Field Instrument for the mission’s > Two main instruments – Wide Field space, more like a zoomed-in view to core science goals and the Coronagraph Instrument for scientific discovery Roman’s panoramic. Instrument for future exoplanet direct- and Coronagraph Instrument to Roman will observe billions of galaxies, imaging technology development. demonstrate advanced technology detailing supernovae and other cosmic L3Harris also conducted the successful > Areas of study include dark phenomena. The data will fuel discoveries test of the primary mirror to ensure it energy, dark matter, exoplanets on dark energy and dark matter, two functions in the very cold temperatures and new galaxies mysteries of the universe that science found in space. cannot fully explain.
    [Show full text]
  • SGL Coronagraph Simulation
    SGL Coronagraph Simulation Hanying Zhou Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA © 2018. California Institute of Technology. Government Sponsorship Acknowledged SGL Coronagraph • Typical exoplanet coronagraphs: Solar corona brightness . Light contamination from the unresolved, close (Lang, K.R., 2010). parent star is the limiting factor: 0.1” Earth sized: ~1e-10; 0.5” Jupiter sized:~ 1e-9 • In SGL: . Light from the parent star focused ~1e3 km away from the imaging telescope . The Sun is an extended source (Rʘ: 1~2 arcsec) . The Einstein ring overlaps w/ the solar corona The Sun light need only to be sufficiently suppressed (to < solar corona level) at the given Einstein’s ring location: ~a few e-7, notionally ~ approx. Einstein’s ring location ~ original “coronagraph” in solar astronomy (Sun angular radius size: Rʘ ~960 arcsec) Technology Requirements to Operate at and Utilize the Solar Gravity Lens for Exoplanet Imaging, 05/16/2018 2 KISS Workshop, May 15-18, Pasadena SGL Coronagraph Simulation General Setup • Classic Lyot coronagraph architecture . Occulter mask:remove central part of PSF Amplitude . Lyot stop: further remove residual part at pupil edge only . Extended source model . The Sun disk: a collection of incoherent off-axis point sources, of uniform brightness . Solar corona: ~1e-6/r^3 power law radial profile brightness (r/Rʘ >=1) . Instrument parameters considered: . Telescope diam, SGL distance, occulter mask profile, Lyot mask size • Fourier based diffraction
    [Show full text]
  • A Glance at the Host Galaxy of High-Redshift Quasars Using Strong Damped Lyman-Α Systems As Coronagraphs
    A&A 558, A111 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321745 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics A glance at the host galaxy of high-redshift quasars using strong damped Lyman-α systems as coronagraphs Hayley Finley1, Patrick Petitjean1, Isabelle Pâris2, Pasquier Noterdaeme1, Jonathan Brinkmann3,AdamD.Myers4, Nicholas P. Ross5, Donald P. Schneider6,7, Dmitry Bizyaev3, Howard Brewington3, Garrett Ebelke3, Elena Malanushenko3 , Viktor Malanushenko3 , Daniel Oravetz3,KaikePan3, Audrey Simmons3, and Stephanie Snedden3 1 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS-UPMC, UMR7095, 98bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile 3 Apache Point Observatory, PO Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349-0059, USA 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA 5 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 92420, USA 6 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7 Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Received 20 April 2013 / Accepted 2 August 2013 ABSTRACT We searched quasar spectra from the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) for the rare occurrences where a strong damped Lyman-α absorber (DLA) blocks the Broad Line Region emission from the quasar and acts as a natural coronagraph to reveal narrow Lyα emission from the host galaxy. We define a statistical sample of 31 DLAs in Data Release 9 (DR9) with log N(H i) ≥ 21.3cm−2 located at less than 1500 km s−1 from the quasar redshift.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Analysis of Effect of Random Segment Errors on Coronagraph Performance
    Preliminary analysis of effect of random segment errors on coronagraph performance Mark T. Stahl, H. Philip Stahl, NASA Marshall Space Flight Ctr. Stuart B. Shaklan, Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology SPIE Conference on Detection and Characterization of Exoplanets, 2015 Executive Summary • Telescope manufacturers need a Wavefront Error (WFE) Stability Specification derived from science requirements. Wavefront Change per Time • Develops methodology for deriving Specification. • Develop modeling tool to explore effects of segmented aperture telescope wavefront stability on coronagraph. Caveats • Monochromatic • Simple model • Band limited 4th order linear Sinc mask 2 Findings • Reconfirms 10 picometers per 10 minutes Specification. • Coronagraph Contrast Leakage is 10X more sensitivity to random segment piston WFE than to random tip/tilt error. • Concludes that few segments (i.e. 0.5 to 1 ring) or very many segments (> 16 rings) has less contrast leakage as a function of piston or tip/tilt than an aperture with 2 to 4 rings of segments. 3 Aperture Dependencies • Stability amplitude is independent of aperture diameter. It depends on required Contrast Stability as a function of IWA. • Stability time depends on detected photon rate which depends on aperture, magnitude, throughput, spectral band, etc. • For a fixed contrast at a fixed wavelength at a 40 mas angular separation, the wavefront stability requirement does have a ~4X larger amplitude for a 12-m telescope than for an 8-m telescope. And, it will have also have a shorter stability requirement for the same magnitude star. 4 Introduction 5 Exoplanet Science The search for extra-terrestrial life is probably the most compelling question in modern astronomy The AURA report: From Cosmic Birth to Living Earths call for A 12 meter class space telescope with sufficient stability and the appropriate instrumentation can find and characterize dozens of Earth-like planets and make transformational advances in astrophysics.
    [Show full text]
  • WFIRST-AFTA Coronagraphic Operations: Lessons Learned from the Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope1 John H
    WFIRST-AFTA Technical Report Rev: B Doc #: WFIRST-STScI-TR1504 Date : September 16, 2015 WFIRST-AFTA Coronagraphic Operations: Lessons Learned from the Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope1 John H. Debesa, Marie Ygoufa, Elodie Choqueta, Dean C. Hinesa, David A. Golimowskia, Charles Lajoiea, Johan Mazoyera, Marshall Perrina, Laurent Pueyo a, Remi´ Soummer a, Roeland van der Marela aSpace Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr., Baltimore, MD, USA, 21212 Abstract. The coronagraphic instrument currently proposed for the WFIRST-AFTA mission will be the first ex- ample of a space-based coronagraph optimized for extremely high contrasts that are required for the direct imaging of exoplanets reflecting the light of their host star. While the design of this instrument is still in progress, this early stage of development is a particularly beneficial time to consider the operation of such an instrument. In this paper, we review current or planned operations on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) with a focus on which operational aspects will have relevance to the planned WFIRST-AFTA coronagraphic instrument. We identify five key aspects of operations that will require attention: 1) detector health and evolution, 2) wavefront control, 3) observing strategies/post-processing, 4) astrometric precision/target acquisition, and 5) po- larimetry. We make suggestions on a path forward for each of these items. Keywords: WFIRST-AFTA, coronagraphy, operations, JWST,HST. Address all correspondence to: John Debes, Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr., Baltimore, MD 21212, USA; Tel: +1 410-338-4782; Fax: +1 410-338-5090; E-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction The WFIRST-AFTA coronagraphic instrument (CGI) enables ground-breaking exoplanet discov- eries using optimized space-based coronagraphic high contrast imaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Nulling for the Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer Robert D
    Adaptive nulling for the Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer Robert D. Peters*, Oliver P. Lay, Akiko Hirai, Muthu Jeganathan Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena CA 91109 ABSTRACT Deep, stable starlight nulls are needed for the direct detection of Earth-like planets and require careful control of the intensity and phases of the beams that are being combined. We are testing a novel compensator based on a deformable mirror to correct the intensity and phase at each wavelength and polarization across the nulling bandwidth. We have successfully demonstrated intensity and phase control using a deformable mirror across a 100nm wide band in the near- IR, and are in the process of conducting experiments in the mid-IR wavelengths. This paper covers the current results and in the mid-IR. Keywords: Nulling interferometry, planet detection, deformable mirror, dispersion compensator, nulling, amplitude and phase correction, adaptive nuller 1. INTRODUCTION Direct detection of Earth like planets around nearby stars requires a combination of starlight suppression and high angular resolution (< 0.1 arcsec). The technique of nulling interferometry1 has been proposed at mid-infrared wavelengths for both the European Darwin mission2 and NASA’s Terrestrial Planet Finder - Interferometer (TPF-I)3. The latter is also developing a visible coronagraph architecture (TPF-C). For the case of the mid-IR interferometer, the light from the star must be suppressed by a factor of 105 or more over the bandwidth of interest, currently 7 - 17 μm. All designs under consideration include a single-mode spatial filter (SMSF) through which the combined light is passed before being detected.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Imaging Coronagraph and Exoplanet Coronal Spectrometer
    Stellar Imaging Coronagraph and Exoplanet Coronal Spectrometer – Two Additional Instruments for Exoplanet Exploration Onboard The WSO-UV 1.7 Meter Orbital Telescope Alexander Tavrova, b, Shingo Kamedac, Andrey Yudaevb, Ilia Dzyubana, Alexander Kiseleva, Inna Shashkovaa*, Oleg Korableva, Mikhail Sachkovd, Jun Nishikawae, Motohide Tamurae, g, Go Murakamif, Keigo Enyaf, Masahiro Ikomag, Norio Naritag a IKI-RAS Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Science, Profsoyuznaya ul. 84/32, Moscow, 117997, Russia b Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 9 Institutskiy per., Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region 141700, Russia c Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo, 171-8501, Japan d INASAN Institute of Astronomy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyatnitskaya str., 48 , Moscow, 119017, Russia e NAOJ National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan f JAXA Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 3-3-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 229-8510, Japan g The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan Abstract. The World Space Observatory for Ultraviolet (WSO-UV) is an orbital optical telescope with a 1.7 m- diameter primary mirror currently under development. The WSO-UV is aimed to operate in the 115–310 nm UV spectral range. Its two major science instruments are UV spectrographs and a UV imaging field camera with filter wheels. The WSO-UV project is currently in the implementation phase, with a tentative launch date in 2023. As designed, the telescope field of view (FoV) in the focal plane is not fully occupied by instruments. Recently, two additional instruments devoted to exoplanets have been proposed for WSO-UV, which are the focus of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Extended Structure in Stars Using the Keck Interferometer Nuller
    Measuring Extended Structure in Stars using the Keck Interferometer Nuller Chris Koreskoa M. Mark Colavitab Eugene Serabynb Andrew Boothb and Jean Garciab aMichelson Science Center, IPAC, Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; bJet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA ABSTRACT The Keck Interferometer Nuller is designed to detect faint off-axis mid-infrared light a few tens to a few hundreds of milliarcseconds from a bright central star. The starlight is suppressed by destructive combination along the long (85 m) baseline, which produces a fringe spacing of 25 mas at a wavelength of 10 µm, with the central null crossing the position of the star. The strong, variable mid-infrared background is subtracted using interferometric phase chopping along the short (5 m) baseline. This paper presents an overview of the observing and data reduction strategies used to produce a calibrated measurement of the off-axis light. During the observations, the instrument cycles rapidly through several calibration and measurement steps, in order to monitor and stabilize the phases of the fringes produced by the various baselines, and to derive the fringe intensity at the constructive peak and destructive null along the long baseline. The data analysis involves removing biases and coherently demodulating the short-baseline fringe with the long-baseline fringe tuned to alternate between constructive and destructive phases, combining the results of many measurements to improve the sensitivity, and estimating the part of the null leakage signal which is associated with the finite angular size of the central star. Comparison of the results of null measurements on science target and calibrator stars permits the instrumental leakage - the “system null leakage” - to be removed and the off-axis light to be measured.
    [Show full text]
  • System Design and Technology Development for the Terrestrial
    System design and technology development for the Terrestrial Planet Finder infrared interferometer Gary Blackwood*, Eugene Serabyn, Serge Dubovitsky, MiMi Aung, Steven M. Gunter, Curt Henry Jet Propulsion Laboratory ABSTRACT This paper describes the technical program that will demonstrate the viability of two mid-infrared interferometer architectures being developed for the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF) to support a mission concept downselect in 2006. The TPF science objectives are to survey a statistically significant number of nearby solar-type stars for radiation from terrestrial planets, to characterize these planets and to then perform spectroscopy for detection of biomarkers. A 4- telescope, 36-m Structurally-Connected Interferometer using a dual-chopped Bracewell nuller will meet the minimum science requirement to completely survey 30 nearby stars and partially survey 120 others. A Formation-Flying Interferometer will meet the full science requirement to completely survey 150 stars, and involves a trade between dual- chopped Bracewell, degenerate Angel Cross, and the Darwin bow-tie input pupil. The system engineering trades for the connected structure and formation-flying architectures are described. The top technical concems for these architectures are mapped to technology developments that will retire these concems prior to the project downselect between a mid- infrared nulling interferometer and a visible coronagraph. Keywords: interferometry, terrestrial planets, nulling, formation-flying, cryogenic structures 1. INTRODUCTION The goals of the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF) are to detect and characterize terrestrial-sized planets around nearby stars for signs of habitability and for evidence of life. The TPF science requirements are to survey a statistically meaningful number of solar-type stars for radiation from terrestrial planets, to characterize these planets and their orbital parameters, and to then perform follow-up spectroscopy on promising targets.
    [Show full text]
  • The MIRI Coronagraphs
    The Mid-Infrared Instrument for the James Webb Space Telescope, V: Predicted Performance of the MIRI Coronagraphs A. Boccaletti1, P.-O. Lagage2, P. Baudoz1,C.Beichman3.4.5,P.Bouchet2,C.Cavarroc6,D. Dubreuil2, Alistair Glasse7,A.M.Glauser8,D.C.Hines9, C.-P. Lajoie9, J. Lebreton3,4,M. D. Perrin9,L.Pueyo9,J.M.Reess1,G.H.Rieke10, S. Ronayette2,D.Rouan1,R. Soummer9, and G. S. Wright7 ABSTRACT The imaging channel on the Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) is equipped with four coronagraphs that provide high contrast imaging capabilities for studying faint point sources and extended emission that would otherwise be overwhelmed by a bright point-source in its vicinity. Such bright sources might include stars that are orbited by exoplanets and circumstellar material, mass-loss envelopes around post-main-sequence stars, the near-nuclear environments in active galax- ies, and the host galaxies of distant quasars. This paper describes the coron- agraphic observing modes of MIRI, as well as performance estimates based on measurements of the MIRI flight model during cryo-vacuum testing. A brief 1LESIA, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, CNRS, Universit´e Pierre et Marie Curie, Universit´eParis Diderot, 5 Place Jules Janssen, F-92195 Meudon, France 2Laboratoire AIM Paris-Saclay, CEA-IRFU/SAp, CNRS, Universit´e Paris Diderot, F-91191 Gif-sur- Yvette, France 3Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 4NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, California Institute of Technology, 770 S. Wilson Ave., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91107, USA 6Laboratoire AIM Paris-Saclay, CEA-IRFU/SAp, CNRS, Universit´e Paris Diderot, F-91191 Gif-sur- Yvette, France 7UK Astronomy Technology Centre, STFC, Royal Observatory Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK 8ETH Zurich, Institute for Astronomy, Wolfgang-Pauli-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Scientific Support Department 2003 – 2004
    COVER 7/11/05 4:55 PM Page 1 SP-1288 SP-1288 Research and Scientific Research Report on the activities of the Support Department Research and Scientific Support Department 2003 – 2004 Contact: ESA Publications Division c/o ESTEC, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands Tel. (31) 71 565 3400 - Fax (31) 71 565 5433 Sec1.qxd 7/11/05 5:09 PM Page 1 SP-1288 June 2005 Report on the activities of the Research and Scientific Support Department 2003 – 2004 Scientific Editor A. Gimenez Sec1.qxd 7/11/05 5:09 PM Page 2 2 ESA SP-1288 Report on the Activities of the Research and Scientific Support Department from 2003 to 2004 ISBN 92-9092-963-4 ISSN 0379-6566 Scientific Editor A. Gimenez Editor A. Wilson Published and distributed by ESA Publications Division Copyright © 2005 European Space Agency Price €30 Sec1.qxd 7/11/05 5:09 PM Page 3 3 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 5 4. Other Activities 95 1.1 Report Overview 5 4.1 Symposia and Workshops organised 95 by RSSD 1.2 The Role, Structure and Staffing of RSSD 5 and SCI-A 4.2 ESA Technology Programmes 101 1.3 Department Outlook 8 4.3 Coordination and Other Supporting 102 Activities 2. Research Activities 11 Annex 1: Manpower Deployment 107 2.1 Introduction 13 2.2 High-Energy Astrophysics 14 Annex 2: Publications 113 (separated into refereed and 2.3 Optical/UV Astrophysics 19 non-refereed literature) 2.4 Infrared/Sub-millimetre Astrophysics 22 2.5 Solar Physics 26 Annex 3: Seminars and Colloquia 149 2.6 Heliospheric Physics/Space Plasma Studies 31 2.7 Comparative Planetology and Astrobiology 35 Annex 4: Acronyms 153 2.8 Minor Bodies 39 2.9 Fundamental Physics 43 2.10 Research Activities in SCI-A 45 3.
    [Show full text]
  • X-Array Aperture Configuration in Planar Or Non-Planar Spacecraft
    X-Array aperture configuration in planar or non-planar spacecraft formation for DARWIN/TPF-I candidate architectures Oswald Wallner, Klaus Ergenzinger, Reinhold Flatscher, Ulrich Johann Astrium GmbH, 88039 Friedrichshafen, Germany ABSTRACT The missions DARWIN and TPF-I (Terrestrial Planet Finder-Interferometer) aim at the search and analysis of terrestrial exo-planets orbiting nearby stars. The major technical challenge is the huge contrast ratio and the small angular separation between star and planet. The observational method to be applied is nulling interferom- etry. It allows for extinguishing the star light by several orders of magnitude and, at the same time, for resolving the faint planet. The fundamental performance of the nulling interferometer is determined by the aperture configuration, the effective performance is driven by the actual instrument implementation. The x-Array, an aperture configuration with 4 telescopes allowing for phase chopping and decoupling of the nulling and imaging properties, provides highest instrument performance. The scientific goals necessitate an instrument setup of high efficiency and utmost symmetry between the beams concerning optical path length, beam profile and state of polarization. Non-planar spacecraft formations allow for a simpler spacecraft design which comes at the cost of inherent constellation and beam asymmetry, of increased complexity of the beam relay optics and of instrumental errors synchronous to the planet signal demodulation frequency. Planar formations allow for perfect efficiency and symmetry but need deployable structures for the secondary mirror and the sunshield due to launcher accommodation constraints. We present a discussion of planar and non-planar implementations of the x-Array aperture configuration and identify for both the critical items and design drivers.
    [Show full text]