DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 2.3 Aristocratic Notions Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This is a post-print version. Please refer to the published version: Charlotta Wolff, ’Aristocratic Notions of Liberty and Patriotism in the Age of Liberty’, Scandinavia in the Age of Revolution: Nordic Political Cultures, 1740–1820, ed. Pasi Ihalainen, Michael Bregnsbo, Karin Sennefelt & Patrik Winton, Ashgate, Farnham & Burlington, 2011, p. 121– 132. Chapter 2.3 Aristocratic Notions of Liberty and Patriotism in the Age of Liberty Charlotta Wolff In Sweden, as in other European countries in the early modern period, the nobility adopted the double role of both collaborator and opponent of the strengthening monarchical state. When opposing royal absolutism, the Swedish nobility would defend their liberty with arguments and concepts borrowed from a general European tradition that has often been called republican, but which could also be called patriotic.1 In the Sweden of the eighteenth century, the nobility dominated the Diet, the Council of the Realm and the highest administration. The noblemen who were active at the Diet were generally well educated, familiar with ancient Roman authors and recent French and English political literature. Their writings abound with literary references and classical commonplaces such as ‘liberty’, ‘republic’, ‘salus publica’ and ‘patriotic zeal’. The strongly European features of the Swedish nobility make the first estate of the realm a particularly interesting object of study. Although the form of government implied equal freedom and rights for all four estates, during the Age of Liberty political power was to a large extent concentrated in the aristocratic Council of the Realm and the Noble estate, while the monarchy remained weakened. The impression of Sweden being a republican monarchy governed 1 Jouanna 1989; Wolff 2008. This is a post-print version. Please refer to the published version: Charlotta Wolff, ’Aristocratic Notions of Liberty and Patriotism in the Age of Liberty’, Scandinavia in the Age of Revolution: Nordic Political Cultures, 1740–1820, ed. Pasi Ihalainen, Michael Bregnsbo, Karin Sennefelt & Patrik Winton, Ashgate, Farnham & Burlington, 2011, p. 121– 132. by aristocrats was all the stronger as the Hat party dominated the Diet from 1738 to 1765 and power thus remained in the hands of a rather small circle. As in other states with a free constitution, liberty was celebrated by the nobility as the foundation stone of the political community. On one hand, the danger of a return to either royal absolutism or aristocratic oligarchy was always present; on the other, the celebration of the freedom from oppression also served to compensate for the relative lack of liberty in society, especially in the lower orders. Liberty and constitutional issues were of course debated in all estates, with many divergences of opinion. In this chapter, we shall take a closer look at the particular ways in which liberty was defended in the Noble estate (for the use of the concept in the other estates, see chapter 2.7). The Ideal of Liberty For most European nobilities in the early modern era, the ideal regime was a mixed constitution, where the powers of the monarch were limited by the existence of representative assemblies and constitutional liberties that granted political participation and physical immunity to free men, noble or non-noble. The Swedish Instruments of Government of 1719 and 1720 were to a large extent drawn up according to this ideal. The aristocratic jurists and political actors behind the texts have been said to have been so impregnated by natural law and English political theory that the form of government of the Age of Liberty could be regarded as a kind of social contract put on paper.2 In the constitutionalist rhetoric of the middle of the century, the time of the birth of the Instruments of Government was described as the beginning of an entirely ‘new age in government’, a new era of regained liberty.3 The reigns of Charles XI and Charles XII 2 Lindroth 1978, pp. 532–3; Nilsén 2001, pp. 114–17. 3 [Carl Gustaf Tessin], TAL, Til Samtelige Riksens Högloflige Ständer, Af Herr Riks-Rådet, Cantzli-Rådet, Öfwerste-Marskalken och Academiae Cancelleren, Höfwälborne Grefwe CARL GUSTAV TESSIN, Tå Riksens Ständer in Pleno Plenorum uppå Stora Riddarhus Salen woro församlade, then 31. Martii 1747 This is a post-print version. Please refer to the published version: Charlotta Wolff, ’Aristocratic Notions of Liberty and Patriotism in the Age of Liberty’, Scandinavia in the Age of Revolution: Nordic Political Cultures, 1740–1820, ed. Pasi Ihalainen, Michael Bregnsbo, Karin Sennefelt & Patrik Winton, Ashgate, Farnham & Burlington, 2011, p. 121– 132. had ended in military, financial and reputational disaster for the realm. The experience of absolutism had awakened a hatred of arbitrariness, lawlessness and all forms of ‘sovereignty’, that is autocratic rule. The official discourse of the new regime would thus focus on liberty and legality. The mixed constitution meant a weak monarchy, a strong four-estate Diet and an aristocratic Council. The regime was based on the notion of the ‘right and liberty of the estates’, mentioned in the preamble of the form of government, and on the balance between the power of the estates, the authority of the Council and the majesty of the monarch.4 The new freedom of the estates gave birth to the particular political culture and ideology that characterized this period: despite the sacredness of the Instrument of Government, constitutional matters were debated at the Diet in a lively manner, and in these debates ‘liberty’ was one of the words used to defend almost any interpretation of the Instrument of Government. The result was an apparently republican discourse in the spirit of old aristocratic constitutionalism. Some time after the transition to estate rule, Swedish politicians started to call the new regime their ‘Age of Liberty’. The term usually referred to an epoch in history, particularly the Roman Republic, during which the people governed itself. It was used in this sense by men such as Count Carl Gustaf Tessin, the poet Olof Dalin, Count Anders Johan von Höpken and Professor Niklas von Oelreich in the late 1740s and the early 1750s.5 With reference to a political situation and to the new nature of the regime, (Stockholm 1747); [Eric Brahe], Öfwerste-Lieutenantens Högwälborne Grefwe ERIC BRAHES TAL, Hållit på Riks-Salen I Stockholm, När Riksdagen slöts then 4. Junii, 1752 (Stockholm 1752). 4 Frihetstidens grundlagar och konstitutionella stadgar, ed. Axel Brusewitz (Stockholm: Riksarkivet 1916), p. 23. 5 Wolff 2008, pp. 49–51. This is a post-print version. Please refer to the published version: Charlotta Wolff, ’Aristocratic Notions of Liberty and Patriotism in the Age of Liberty’, Scandinavia in the Age of Revolution: Nordic Political Cultures, 1740–1820, ed. Pasi Ihalainen, Michael Bregnsbo, Karin Sennefelt & Patrik Winton, Ashgate, Farnham & Burlington, 2011, p. 121– 132. ‘liberty’ alone had already been used in the 1730s.6 Generally speaking, liberty was continuously celebrated in a manner that borderd on self-assurance in official speeches at solemn occasions as well as in normal, everyday Diet sessions and even in private correspondence. The defence of liberty as the pillar of Swedish political ideology was presented as an ancient tradition. The often repeated concept of ‘a free people’ referred to the tradition of a free peasantry, but it was also and above all a way of emphasizing the political independence of the estates. For the best educated rhetors of the Diet, the central place given to liberty allowed allusions to the Roman Republic and other, modern polities without ruling sovereigns, such as the Italian city states. The realization of a Swedish republic without a ruler, however, was too radical an idea for most of these aristocratic politicians, who needed the graces of the court to maintain their social and economic status. What we could call ‘republicanism’ was thus mainly a way of underlining certain political values, a patriotic code of ethics built on the love of liberty and the fatherland.7 The expression ‘right and liberty’ used in the preamble to the Instrument of Government of 1720 proclaimed the Diet’s independence from royal or ministerial interference and thus reflected a perception of liberty that could be defined as an immunity against any sovereign power, including the regal state.8 As time passed, the 6 [Carl Emil Lewenhaupt], Til Hennes Kongl. Maj:t Wår Allernådigste Drottning, Af Grefwen och LandtMarschalken Högwälborne Herr General Majoren CARL EMIL LEWENHAUPT, Uppå Samtel. Riksens Ständers wägnar håldne Tahl wid Riksdagen A. 1734 (Stockholm 1734); [Carl Gustaf Tessin], Landt-Marskalkens Högwälborne Grefwe CARL GUSTAF TESSINS Tal, Hållit til Ridderskapet och Adeln Wid Landt-Marskalks Stafwens emottagande Den 17. Maii 1738 (Stockholm 1738). 7 Wolff 2008. 8 Skinner 2003, pp. 11–25; Lindberg 2006, pp. 171–3. This is a post-print version. Please refer to the published version: Charlotta Wolff, ’Aristocratic Notions of Liberty and Patriotism in the Age of Liberty’, Scandinavia in the Age of Revolution: Nordic Political Cultures, 1740–1820, ed. Pasi Ihalainen, Michael Bregnsbo, Karin Sennefelt & Patrik Winton, Ashgate, Farnham & Burlington, 2011, p. 121– 132. liberty of the estates became a synonym for their extensive power, while, at the same time, the estates themselves merged with the state.9 In 1760, when the power of the estates was at its zenith, Carl Fredrik Scheffer, writing an interpretation of the Swedish form of government for Prince Gustavus, went so far as to translate the ‘right and liberty’ of the estates as ius et imperium.10 The translation is all the more remarkable in that classical political theory had argued over which, ius or imperium, was the precondition of the other and to what extent they were antipodes.11 By replacing libertas with imperium, Scheffer made a silent ideological statement, translating liberty as ‘sovereign power’ without using the forbidden word libertas [liberty].
Recommended publications
  • University of Southern Denmark

    University of Southern Denmark

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK THE CHRISTIAN KINGDOM AS AN IMAGE OF THE HEAVENLY KINGDOM ACCORDING TO ST. BIRGITTA OF SWEDEN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY INSTITUTE OF HISTORY, CULTURE AND CIVILISATION CENTRE FOR MEDIEVAL STUDIES BY EMILIA ŻOCHOWSKA ODENSE FEBRUARY 2010 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In my work, I had the privilege to be guided by three distinguished scholars: Professor Jacek Salij in Warsaw, and Professors Tore Nyberg and Kurt Villads Jensen in Odense. It is a pleasure to admit that this study would never been completed without the generous instruction and guidance of my masters. Professor Salij introduced me to the world of ancient and medieval theology and taught me the rules of scholarly work. Finally, he encouraged me to search for a new research environment where I could develop my skills. I found this environment in Odense, where Professor Nyberg kindly accepted me as his student and shared his vast knowledge with me. Studying with Professor Nyberg has been a great intellectual adventure and a pleasure. Moreover, I never would have been able to work at the University of Southern Denmark if not for my main supervisor, Kurt Villads Jensen, who trusted me and decided to give me the opportunity to study under his kind tutorial, for which I am exceedingly grateful. The trust and inspiration I received from him encouraged me to work and in fact made this study possible. Karen Fogh Rasmussen, the secretary of the Centre of Medieval Studies, had been the good spirit behind my work.
  • Towards the Kalmar Union

    Towards the Kalmar Union

    S P E C I A L I Z E D A G E N C I E S TOWARDS THE KALMAR UNION Dear Delegates, Welcome to the 31st Annual North American Model United Nations 2016 at the University of Toronto! On behalf of all of the staff at NAMUN, we welcome you to the Specialized Agency branch of the conference. I, and the rest of the committee staff are thrilled to have you be a delegate in Scandinavia during the High Middle Ages, taking on this challenging yet fascinating topic on the futures of the three Scandinavian Kingdoms in a time of despair, poverty, dependence and competitiveness. This will truly be a new committee experience, as you must really delve into the history of these Kingdoms and figure out how to cooperate with each other without sending everyone into their demise. To begin, in the Towards the Kalmar Union Specialized Agency, delegates will represent influential characters from Denmark, Norway and Sweden, which include prominent knights, monarchs, nobles, and important religious figures who dominate the political, military and economic scenes of their respective Kingdoms. The impending issues that will be discussed at the meeting in Kalmar, Sweden include the future of the Danish and Norwegian crowns after the death of the sole heir to the thrones, Olaf II. Here, two distant relatives to Valdemar IV have a claim to the throne and delegates will need to decide who will succeed to the throne. The second order of business is to discuss the growing German presence in Sweden, especially in major economic cities.
  • Estate Landscapes in Northern Europe: an Introduction

    Estate Landscapes in Northern Europe: an Introduction

    J Estate Landscapes in northern Europe an introduction By Jonathan Finch and Kristine Dyrmann This volume represents the first transnational exploration of the estate Harewood House, West Yorkshire, landscape in northern Europe. It brings together experts from six coun- UK Harewood House was built between tries to explore the character, role and significance of the estate over five /012 and /00/ for Edwin Lascelles, whose family made their fortune in the West hundred years during which the modern landscape took shape. They do Indies. The parkland was laid out over so from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds, to provide the first critical the same period by Lancelot ‘Capability’ study of the estate as a distinct cultural landscape. The northern European Brown and epitomizes the late-eighteenth countries discussed in this volume – Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, century taste for a more informal natural- the Netherlands and Britain – have a fascinating and deep shared history istic landscape. Small enclosed fields from of cultural, economic and social exchange and dialogue. Whilst not always the seventeenth century were replaced by a family at peace, they can lay claim to having forged many key aspects of parkland that could be grazed, just as it is the modern world, including commercial capitalism and industrialization today, although some hedgerow trees were retained to add interest within the park, from an overwhelmingly rural base in the early modern period. United such as those in the foreground. By the around the North Sea, the region was a gateway to the east through the early-nineteenth century all arable culti- Baltic Sea, and across the Atlantic to the New World in the west.
  • MCMANUS-DISSERTATION-2016.Pdf (4.095Mb)

    MCMANUS-DISSERTATION-2016.Pdf (4.095Mb)

    The Global Lettered City: Humanism and Empire in Colonial Latin America and the Early Modern World The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation McManus, Stuart Michael. 2016. The Global Lettered City: Humanism and Empire in Colonial Latin America and the Early Modern World. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493519 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Global Lettered City: Humanism and Empire in Colonial Latin America and the Early Modern World A dissertation presented by Stuart Michael McManus to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2016 © 2016 – Stuart Michael McManus All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisors: James Hankins, Tamar Herzog Stuart Michael McManus The Global Lettered City: Humanism and Empire in Colonial Latin America and the Early Modern World Abstract Historians have long recognized the symbiotic relationship between learned culture, urban life and Iberian expansion in the creation of “Latin” America out of the ruins of pre-Columbian polities, a process described most famously by Ángel Rama in his account of the “lettered city” (ciudad letrada). This dissertation argues that this was part of a larger global process in Latin America, Iberian Asia, Spanish North Africa, British North America and Europe.
  • Anglo-Saxon Constitutional History

    Anglo-Saxon Constitutional History

    English Legal History—Outline (former l16) 11/5/2018 Page 1 THE DEPOSITION OF KINGS 1. The slow changes in the English constitution of the 14th and 15th centuries: a. the development of a bicameral Parliament b. its gradual growth of involvement in taxation and legislation and the of the custom of consulting it on great matters of the realm. c. the growth of the power and, at least to a certain extent, of the independence of the departments of state (the chancery and the exchequer) and of the courts d. the attempt of the magnates to control the departments of state by controlling appointments, and of the king to control both the departments of state and the magnates through the wardrobe and chamber—and of the ultimate failure, at least in the 14th century, of both efforts e. the rise in the middle of the 14th century of the importance of the council. In the Lancastrian period two lines of authority emerge, which did not conflict: one between the signet and the secretary, the other between the privy seal and the council, both leading ultimately to the great seal and the chancery. f. the experimentatation of Edward III with chamber finance and the return of chamber finance in the reign of Edward IV a hundred years later and the increasingly tight control that Henry VII had over finance. 2. The medieval depositions: a. Edward II—1327. b. Richard II—1399. c. Henry VI—1460. (Not a deposition, an act of accord, though a deposition of sorts took place in March of 1461.
  • Oligarchic Democracy Call for Papers

    Oligarchic Democracy Call for Papers

    CALL FOR PAPERS Constitutional Responses to the Crisis of Representation and Oligarchic Democracy Introduction This Call for Papers is issued by the Constitution Building Programme of the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), as part of a research project on Constitutional Responses to the Crisis of Representation and Oligarchic Democracy. The project seeks to examine the problem of ‘oligarchic democracy’ and to consider whether, and how, constitutional design may provide a useful corrective to the oligarchic tendencies in liberal-democracies. The expectation is that the papers will inspire a focused debate around the issue of oligarchic democracy and anti-oligarchic constitution-making. Selected papers will be synthesized into one report that will be addressed to a mixed audience of academics and reflective practitioners in various fields of constitutional practice, whether as constitutional lawyers, politicians, international advisors, or civil society activists working in constitutional reform, public policy or poverty-reduction fields. It is also intended that the best papers will be selected for inclusion in an edited volume or special edition of an academic journal. Papers should be written in English. The length of each paper should between 5000 and 8000 words, including all notes and references. Papers are invited in response to any aspect arising from or connected with any of the five thematic areas outlined in the attached Framing Document. It is expected that there will be a panel of the workshop discussing each of these five thematic areas. Selected applicants will be invited to present their papers at an Authors’ Workshop to be held in The Netherlands during 2017, with a view to eventual publication on the International IDEA Constitution Building website (www.constitutionnet.org).
  • Quetzalcoatl and the Irony of Empire : Myths and Prophecies in the Aztec Tradition / Davíd Carrasco ; with a New Preface.—Rev

    Quetzalcoatl and the Irony of Empire : Myths and Prophecies in the Aztec Tradition / Davíd Carrasco ; with a New Preface.—Rev

    Quetzalcoatl and the Irony of Empire Quetzalcoatl and the Irony of Empire Myths and Prophecies in the Aztec Tradition Revised Edition David Carrasco ~University Press of Colorado Copyright © 2000 by the University Press of Colorado International Standard Book Number 0-87081-558-X Published by the University Press of Colorado 5589 Arapahoe Avenue, Suite 206C Boulder, Colorado 80303 Previously published by the University of Chicago Press All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. The University Press of Colorado is a cooperative publishing enterprise supported, in part, by Adams State College, Colorado State University, Fort Lewis College, Mesa State College, Metropolitan State College of Denver, University of Colorado, University of Northern Colorado, University of Southern Colorado, and Western State College of Colorado. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carrasco, Davíd. Quetzalcoatl and the irony of empire : myths and prophecies in the Aztec tradition / Davíd Carrasco ; with a new preface.—Rev. ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-87081-558-X (alk. paper) 1. Aztec mythology. 2. Aztecs—Urban residence. 3. Quetzalcoatl (Aztec deity) 4. Sacred space—Mexico. I. Title. F1219.76.R45.C37 2000 299'.78452—dc21 00-048008 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To my mythic figures
  • Genealogical Queries from the Swedish House of Nobles Pontus Möller

    Genealogical Queries from the Swedish House of Nobles Pontus Möller

    Swedish American Genealogist Volume 7 | Number 4 Article 5 12-1-1987 Genealogical Queries from the Swedish House of Nobles Pontus Möller Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/swensonsag Part of the Genealogy Commons, and the Scandinavian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Möller, Pontus (1987) "Genealogical Queries from the Swedish House of Nobles," Swedish American Genealogist: Vol. 7 : No. 4 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/swensonsag/vol7/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Swenson Swedish Immigration Research Center at Augustana Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Swedish American Genealogist by an authorized editor of Augustana Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Genealogical Queries from the Swedish House of N obi es Pontus Moller From a reference in the March 1987 issue of SAG I learn that the Genealogical Section of the Swedish House of Nobles spends a lot of time and energy trying to find families in the U.S. who belong to the Swedish nobility but for some reason or another have lost contact with the country of their forefathers. Being the Chief Genealogist of Riddarhuset since 1963 and the editor of its publication, Adelskalendern since 1961, I can certainly confirm this. May I therefore take this opportunity to ask the readers of SAG if they know anything about the following members of the Swedish noble families in the U.S. and also perhaps about their descendants today. Every piece of information about them, their families, dates and places of death, whereabouts as well as old addresses will be highly appreciated.
  • Noble Conceptions of Politics in Eighteenth-Century Sweden (Ca 1740–1790)

    Noble Conceptions of Politics in Eighteenth-Century Sweden (Ca 1740–1790)

    charlotta wolff Noble conceptions of politics in eighteenth-century Sweden (ca 1740–1790) Studia Fennica Historica The Finnish Literature Society (SKS) was founded in 1831 and has, from the very beginning, engaged in publishing operations. It nowadays publishes literature in the fields of ethnology and folkloristics, linguistics, literary research and cultural history. The first volume of the Studia Fennica series appeared in 1933. Since 1992, the series has been divided into three thematic subseries: Ethnologica, Folkloristica and Linguistica. Two additional subseries were formed in 2002, Historica and Litteraria. The subseries Anthropologica was formed in 2007. In addition to its publishing activities, the Finnish Literature Society maintains research activities and infrastructures, an archive containing folklore and literary collections, a research library and promotes Finnish literature abroad. Studia fennica editorial board Anna-Leena Siikala Markku Haakana Timo Kaartinen Pauli Kettunen Leena Kirstinä Teppo Korhonen Kati Lampela Editorial Office SKS P.O. Box 259 FI-00171 Helsinki www.finlit.fi Charlotta Wolff Noble conceptions of politics in eighteenth-century Sweden (ca 1740–1790) Finnish Literature Society • Helsinki Studia Fennica Historica 15 The publication has undergone a peer review. The open access publication of this volume has received part funding via Helsinki University Library. © 2016 Charlotta Wolff and SKS License CC-BY-NC-ND A digital edition of a printed book first published in 2008 by the Finnish Literature Society. Cover Design: Timo Numminen EPUB Conversion: eLibris Media Oy ISBN 978-952-222-092-9 (Print) ISBN 978-952-222-782-9 (PDF) ISBN 978-952-222-781-2 (EPUB) ISSN 0085-6835 (Studia Fennica) ISSN 1458-526X (Studia Fennica Historica) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21435/sfh.15 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license.
  • Serfdom and State Power in Imperial Russia

    Serfdom and State Power in Imperial Russia

    Roger Bartlett Serfdom and State Power in Imperial Russia The institution of serfdom has been a central and much debated feature of early modern Russian history: it has sometimes been described as Russia’s ‘peculiar institution’, as central to the Russian experience as black slavery has been to the American.1 It is striking, however, that the rise and dominance of serfdom within Muscovite/Russian society coincided closely in historical terms with the rise to European eminence and power of the Muscovite state and Russian Empire. The subjection of the peasantry to its landlord masters was finally institutionalized in 1649, at a time when for most of the rest of Europe Muscovy was a little-known and peripheral state, in John Milton’s words, ‘the most northern Region of Europe reputed civil’.2 When Peter I proclaimed Russia an empire, in 1721, it had displaced Sweden to become the leading state of Northern Europe; one hundred years later Russia was the premier European land power. Its loss of international status after the Crimean War in 1856 helped to precipitate the abolition of serfdom (1861); but the ‘Great Reforms’ of the 1860s did not enable it to regain the international position achieved after the Napoleonic Wars. Thus the period of history from the mid-seventeenth to mid-nineteenth centuries, when serfdom became a securely entrenched legal and economic institution, was also the period in which Russia — the Muscovite state and Russian Empire — became relatively more powerful than at any other time in its history before 1945. This article seeks to examine some of the features of serfdom in Russia, to look briefly at its place in the structure and dynamics of Russian society, and to investigate the relationship between the establish- ment of serfdom in practice and the success of Russian govern- ments both in domestic affairs and on the international stage.
  • Foreign Drums Beating Transnational Experiences in Early Modern Europe

    Foreign Drums Beating Transnational Experiences in Early Modern Europe

    Foreign Drums Beating Transnational Experiences in Early Modern Europe Edited by Björn Forsén and Mika Hakkarainen Acta Byzantina Fennica 5 (N.s.) Acta Byzantina Fennica 5 (N.s) Foreign Drums Beating Transnational Experiences in Early Modern Europe Edited by Björn Forsén and Mika Hakkarainen Helsinki 2017 © Finnish Society for Byzantine Studies Helsinki 2017 ISSN 1458-7017 ISBN 978-952-93-9965-9 Printed in Finland by Grano OU, Vantaa Page Layout: The Federation of Finnish Learned Societies / Publishing Services. Cover: Johann Peter Krafft, Nikola Šubić Zrinski’s Charge from the Fortress of Szigetvár (1825). Wikimedia commons. Contents Preface 5 Björn Forsén and Conflicts, Coexistence and Cultural Contacts: 7 Mika Hakkarainen Some Contributions to Early Modern History Mika Hakkarainen Contro il nemico comune: Swedish Subjects in 19 Venetian Service during the Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Century Björn Forsén Glory and Fraud: The Venetian Adventure of 53 the Swedish Family Sparre Lars Ericson Wolke Swedish Officers in Foreign Service 1648- 105 1762: A Synthesis Kasper Kepsu Integrating Russian Bayors in the Swedish 129 Nobility Dariusz Permeable Frontiers: Contacts between Polish 153 Kołodziejczyk and Turkish-Tatar Elites in the Early Modern Era Gisela Procházka- Tracing Ottoman Cultural Influence beyond 169 Eisl the Border with Austria in the Seventeenth Century List of Contributors 187 Integrating Russian Bayors in the Swedish Nobility Kasper Kepsu In the early seventeenth century a group of Russian noble families entered Swedish service in connection with the power struggle between Sweden and Russia in northeastern Europe. Most of these families entered service during the Time of Troubles and were called Russian bayors (“ryssbajor- er”) by the Swedish authorities.1 They settled in the province of Ingria (sw.
  • Discussions PL ISSN 0001 - 6829

    Discussions PL ISSN 0001 - 6829

    Acta Poloniae Histories 77, 1998 Discussions PL ISSN 0001 - 6829 Michał Kopczyński THE NOBILITY AND THE STATE IN THE 16th—18th CENTURIES. THE SWEDISH MODEL (in connection with Jan Samuelson’s book Aristokrat eller förädlad bonde ? Det svenska frälsets ekonomi, politik och sociala förbindelser under tiden 1523-1611, Lund University Press 1993, 361 pp. Bibliotheca Historica Lundensis 77) What characterized the early modern social structures in the Scandinavian countries was a low percentage of nobility. In 17th century Denmark the nobility accounted for about 0,5 per cent of the population, in Sweden it did not exceed 1 per cent. This, as well as the early development of the state fiscal and control apparatus in Sweden, the fact that sources have survived ina perfect state and that Swedish genealogical studies have a long-standing tradition, makes it possible to reconstruct the effective force, financial status and family connections not only of the aristocracy but also of the petty nobility. Many studies have appeared in Sweden on the genesis of the nobility, its transformations in the 17th century and the change in its social and political functions in the 17th-19th centuries1. The 16th century has been a blank space. Detailed studies have dealt with the noblemen’s privi­ leges, the endowment of estates by the Crown, and the nobility’s political 1 See I.M. Munktell, Gods, godsägare och landbor 1450-1520. Studier i de senmedeltida frälsegodsens funktion, Göteborg 1982; I. E l mroth‚ För kung och fosterland. Studier i den svenska adelns demografi och offentliga funktioner 1600-1900, Lund 1981; P.