Critical Analysis of Environmental Water Quality in South Africa: Historic and Current Trends

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Critical Analysis of Environmental Water Quality in South Africa: Historic and Current Trends Critical Analysis of Environmental Water Quality in South Africa: Historic and Current Trends Report to the WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION by NJ Griffin1, CG Palmer1 and P-A Scherman2 1Unilever Centre for Environmental Water Quality, Institute for Water Research, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 2Scherman Colloty & Associates (SC&A), Grahamstown, South Africa WRC Report No. 2184/1/14 ISBN 978-1-4312-0536-3 April 2014 Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 Gezina, 0031 [email protected] or download from www.wrc.org.za DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. © Water Research Commission Executive summary BACKGROUND South Africa is widely recognised as having an admirable water law, and as being a leader in granting a right to water, in terms of quality and quantity, to the environment. However, the water quality of South African water resources is deteriorating (e.g. CSIR 2010, DWA 2011a), although good water quality management structures, strategies, approaches, programmes, instruments, and tools have been developed and implemented nationally. The research reported on here provides a review of changes in water quality management structures, programmes and approaches over the past two decades, and highlights areas where these need updating, completion or revision. As a comparative illustration of changes in water quality with time, changes in 11 water quality parameters in two river systems (the Crocodile River in Mpumalanga, which is moderately impacted, and the Olifants River, in Mpumalanga and Limpopo, which is severely impacted) are presented. AIMS In this regard, this report presents: • A review and critique of the development of policy, management practice and methodologies associated with environmental water quality, within water resource protection; • Recommendations for research that will support implementation of legal, policy and strategy requirements for environmental water quality, within water resource protection and • An assessment of the long term water quality trends in two catchments, selected as examples of systems that are moderately (the Crocodile River, Mpumalanga), and seriously (Olifants River, Mpumalanga/Limpopo) impacted by deteriorating water quality. INTRODUCTION The South African National Water Acts (No. 36 of 1998) made legal provision for the protection of water resources. Protective measures are termed Resource Directed Measures (RDM) and these include three processes: Classification; Reserve determination; and the setting of Resource Quality Objectives. These three processes are undertaken at differing bio-physical and institutional scales, with larger Integrated Units of Analysis (IUA) being used for classification of the resource, but smaller Resource Units (RU) being used for management at a finer scale and for the setting of Resource Quality Objectives (RQO). Management processes formally integrate these three to achieve overall management of the resource. Establishment of an understanding of environmental water quality and its underlying information requirements is relatively recent, and has been developed on the basis of an interaction between research and practice. Although much work on environmental water quality has been undertaken, finalization of methods has not occurred and no officially approved methodology has been put in place. In addition, methods for assessing long term trends in water quality are not clear. REVIEW OF SOUTH AFRICAN ENVIRONMENTAL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT Management of environmental water quality in South Africa is undertaken to ensure water security in terms of quantity and quality to support economic and social development without compromising ecological sustainability. This report will review historic and current management of environmental water quality management with a focus on surface water in rivers, though other resources will receive some attention. For the most part, this report looks at methods and tools dealing with the resource, i and other management approaches, such as end-of-pipe assessment and treatment will receive less attention. Management of water quality at the Department of Water Affairs (DWA) is undertaken via the Chief Directorate: Resource Directed Measures (CD: RDM) and the Sub-Directorate: Water Quality Planning (WQP). The objective is to provide effective management and policy guidance with the context of integrated water resource management. One function of WQP is to undertake national reviews of water quality to determine status and trends in the resource with the aim of supporting strategic management decision making. The management of water quality for the aquatic environment is laid out in a series of documents entitled “Resource Directed Management of water Quality” published in 2006. The Chief Directorate: Resource Directed Measures was established in 2004 in order to ensure sustainable utilization of the country’s water resources to meet ecological, social and economic objectives, and to audit the state of water resources against these objectives. In particular, it is responsible for developing methodologies for RDM, determining and updating targets (as RQOs or the Reserve), assessing and auditing resource quality, and building capacity and providing support for RDM implementation. CD: RDM comprises three Directorates: Water Resource Classification; Reserve Requirements; and Resource Directed Measures Compliance. These interact as follows. • Classification: Weighs up the consequences of different scenarios of managing a catchment to produce a catchment configuration of Ecological Categories and a resultant Management Class. • Reserve: Quantifies the quantity and quality of water to achieve certain Ecological and Basic Human Needs Requirements. • Resource quality objectives: RQOs are numerical and/or narrative descriptive statements of conditions which should be met in the receiving water resource. RQOs will be developed to describe the set MCs, which leads on to monitoring. Resource Directed Measures interact with Source-directed Controls (SDC) and water use licensing in management of the resource. A decision support system, Assessment of Consideration for Water Use Application (ACWUA), has been developed to inform decisions on licence applications. Decisions are based in multiple criteria including socio-economic factors, race and gender considerations, and alignment to catchment strategy. Beyond ACWUA, a number of other tools are available or are planned to support water quality management in South Africa. Most of these are available, though uptake and application across the country varies. Regulatory tools for water quality management have been developed and are available. As management of pollution at source is recognized as an efficient and cost-effective approach, tools addressing this end are important in this regard. Failure to comply with licensing or authorisation conditions may result DWA issuing a directive, the withdrawal of a license, and, usually as a last resort, prosecution. Economic instruments for water quality management include the Waste Discharge Charge System (WCDS), which has the following three purposes: recovery of management costs; recovery of mitigation costs; and discouragement of water discharge. The WCDS initially only applies to point source discharges, as diffuse discharges are more difficult to quantify. Although WCDS currently operates at a national level, local input and interaction with other government bodies is important. A number of tools are available for self-regulation of water users’ impact on the resource. Some of these, such as ISO 14001 certification, have been widely implemented in certain sectors. ii WATER QUALITY ISSUES IN SOUTH AFRICA South Africa faces a number of challenges with regard to water quality. Some of these are widely recognised, while less is known of the others. Eutrophication is a major and widely recognised threat to water quality in the country. Eutrophication is a consequence of nutrient enrichment that leads to ecological changes, mostly notably blooms of algae or macrophytes. Eutrophication may impact on ecological systems, and also have aesthetic, recreational, agricultural, and human health impacts. Nutrient input to a resource can be anthropogenic as well as natural. Anthropogenic drivers of eutrophication include increased nutrient from wastewater, either from incorrectly run treatment plants or as a function of an increasing population, nutrient input owing to agricultural practices, and finally input from mines and/or industry. Algal blooms consequent on eutrophication have major ecological consequences, and the cyanobacterial blooms that are more common in the country may also produce toxins, and well as compounds modifying the taste and odour of abstracted water. Macrophyte blooms also have severe ecological consequences, and may lead to blockages of pipes or canals. There are a number of approaches to dealing with eutrophication; none practically address the removal of nutrients from a eutrophied system. Acid mine drainage (AMD) results largely from the oxidation of sulphide minerals (often pyrites), and is commonly facilitated by acidophilic bacteria. Typical consequences of this process are lowered pH levels, increased salinity (often as sulphates), and mobilisation
Recommended publications
  • Bezhoek Heritage Report
    Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Cultural Heritage Survey of the Farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS, Magisterial District of Middelburg, Mpumalanga For Bezuidenhoutshoek Farm (Pty) Ltd P O Box 1152 Gallo Manor 2052 By Francois P Coetzee Department of Anthropology & Archaeology University of South Africa PO Box 392 Pretoria 0003 Tel: (012) 429 6297 Fax: (012) 429 6091 [email protected] August 2009 Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 2. Terms of Reference 3. Nature of the Proposed Activity or Development 4. Definitions and Approach 5. Methodology 5.1 Maps and Other Sources 5.2 Fieldwork 5.3 Visibility and Constraints 6. Description of Study Area 7. Archaeological Sequence 8. Archaeological Context 8.1 Stone Age 8.2 Iron Age Sequence 8.3 Ethno-historical Context 9. Description of Sites 10. Summary of Sites 11. Rock Art Sites 12. Director-General: Survey Maps 13. Conclusions and Recommendations Bibliography Francois P Coetzee Heritage Survey of the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS Executive Summary This report focuses on the results from a cultural heritage investigation on the farm Bezuidenhoutshoek 274JS. The area is characterised by mountainous areas (featuring the Olifants River) as well as open grassland. The area has a rich cultural heritage with Ndebele people living in the area since AD1650 and white farmers settling in the late 19th Century. Iron Age settlements Five Late Iron Age stone-walled settlements were recorded during the survey. These are preliminarily associated with Ndzundza-Ndebele occupation (AD 1650 – AD 1830). Some of these sites are extensive and have substantial archaeological deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Affairs in the Lower Blyde River the Role of DWAF in Local Water Management
    Water Affairs in the Lower Blyde River The role of DWAF in local water management IWMI Working Paper B.W. Raven, April 2004, Wageningen Acknowledgments The author likes to thank specifically Barbara van Koppen (IWMI) and Jeroen Warner (Wageningen University) for their help and contribution to this case study. The author further thanks: Willy Enright (DWAF Western Cape), Edward Lahiff (Western Cape University), Cees Leeuwis (Wageningen University), Derek Weston and Francois van der Merwe (DWAF Pretoria), Gert Bezuidenhout Johan Du Preez (Lower Blyde River WUA) Francis Mohlala (Mametja / Sekororo communities), Marie Tinka Uys (Environmental issues Blyde River), Gerhard Backeberg (WRC Pretoria), Anthony Turton (AWIRU Pretoria), Herve Levite, Nicholas Faysse, Tebogo Seshoka and other colleagues of IWMI Pretoria. 1 Content 1 Introduction 1.1 Case Study: The Lower Blyde River 1.2 The Case Study in perspective: South Africa and The Netherlands 1.3 Case Study Objectives 2 General Background 2.1 Multi Stakeholder Participation 2.2 Former SA irrigation policy 2.3 The new SA water policy: NWA 1998 2.4 Building CMAs and WUAs 3 The Lower Blyde River 3.1 The Blyde River Catchment 3.2 Stakeholders 3.2.1 Irrigation Farmers 3.2.2 Mametja / Sekororo Communities 3.2.3 Upstream Stakeholders 3.2.4 Downstream Stakeholders 3.2.5 Governments involved 4 Water Management in the Lower Blyde River 4.1 The Lower Blyde WUA 4.2 The Lower Blyde Irrigation Pipeline 4.3 The 800ha Black Emerging Farmers Project 4.4 Domestic Water Supply Mametja / Sekororo communities 5 Conclusions Bibliography Annex: list of interviews 2 1 Introduction “The new South Africa is the world in microcosm, in its population mix, its wealth gap and above all in the impact which the new forces of globalisation are having on it.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Historic, Current and Future Water Demand in the Olifants River Catchment, South Africa
    RESEARCH REPORT Evaluation of Historic, Current 118 and Future Water Demand in the Olifants River Catchment, South Africa Matthew P. McCartney and Roberto Arranz International Water Management IWMI is a Future Harvest Center Institute supported by the CGIAR Research Reports IWMI’s mission is to improve water and land resources management for food, livelihoods and nature. In serving this mission, IWMI concentrates on the integration of policies, technologies and management systems to achieve workable solutions to real problems—practical, relevant results in the field of irrigation and water and land resources. The publications in this series cover a wide range of subjects—from computer modeling to experience with water user associations—and vary in content from directly applicable research to more basic studies, on which applied work ultimately depends. Some research reports are narrowly focused, analytical and detailed empirical studies; others are wide-ranging and synthetic overviews of generic problems. Although most of the reports are published by IWMI staff and their collaborators, we welcome contributions from others. Each report is reviewed internally by IWMI’s own staff and Fellows, and by external reviewers. The reports are published and distributed both in hard copy and electronically (www.iwmi.org) and where possible all data and analyses will be available as separate downloadable files. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment. Research Report 118 Evaluation of Historic, Current and Future Water Demand in the Olifants River Catchment, South Africa Matthew P. McCartney and Roberto Arranz International Water Management Institute P O Box 2075, Colombo, Sri Lanka i IWMI receives its principal funding from 58 governments, private foundations, and international and regional organizations known as the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Impacts to Be Considered by the Oryx Gems Prospecting Rights Application
    Potential impacts to be considered by the Oryx Gems prospecting rights application Biodiversity, Ecosystems & Natural Resources The farm portions overlap with several Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBA) and Ecological Support Areas (ESA) under the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan (MBSP, 2014) and the National Freshwater Ecosystem Priority Areas (NFEPA, 2011) o Multiple Irreplaceable and Optimal terrestrial CBAs and ESAs o Multiple CBA and ESA rivers, wetlands and catchments (including the Blyde & Lisbon Rivers as listed CBA rivers) o Several downstream aquatic CBAs and ESAs under the Limpopo Conservation Plan (2013) will also be affected The farm portions overlap with three NEMBA listed Threatened Ecosystems: o Northern Escarpment Dolomite Grassland (Vulnerable) o Blyde Quartzite Grasslands (Endangered) o Malmali Karstlands (Endangered) The Unique community, ‘Graskop grassland’, registered under Mpumalanga Nature Conservation Act (1998) is located on the farm portions Birdlife Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA): area overlaps with the globally listed Blyde River Canyon IBA Threatened or rare species, or species of conservation concern potentially occurring on the farm portions: o Bird species: Blue swallow, Bald Ibis, Striped Flufftail, Stanley’s Bustard (Neotis denhami), Blackwinged Plover (Vanellus melanopterus), Buffstreaked Chat (Oenanthe bifaciata) o Mammal species: Oribi, Rough-haired Golden Mole, Meester’s Golden Mole, Short-eared Trident Bat, Natal Long-fingered Bat o Reptile species: Bradypodion transvaalense, Lamprophis
    [Show full text]
  • INVESTOR FACT SHEET 4. Blyde River Hydro Power Project
    INVESTOR FACT SHEET 4. Blyde River Hydro Power Project A. PROJECT SECTOR: Renewable Energy I. INTRODUCTION The Blyde River (Happy River) or Motlatse River, is a river in Mpumalanga Province South Africa. It flows north through the steep-sided valleys and ravines of the Mpumalanga Drakensberg (Dragon Mountains), before it enters the Lowveld Escapement – one of Africa’s prime wildlife and game reserves destinations. The Blyde River Hydro Power Project is a small Hydo-Electric Project involving the re-engineering and re-establishment of an existing hydro-electric power plant. II. LOCATION South Africa – Mpumalanga Province – Thaba Chweu Municipality III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This renewable energy project is situated in the environmentally sensitive Blyde River Canyon Nature Reserve of Mpumalanga Province. This area attracts over one million tourists a year to the natural wonder of the surrounding Bourke’s Luck Potholes, Gods Window, the Blyde River Canyon and the world famous Kruger National Park. Mpumalanga Province is an attractive Green Energy investment destination in support of the tourism infrastructure and local communities. The existing but non-operational Belvedere Hydro-Electric Power Plant was commissioned in 1911 to supply power to the historic gold mining town of Pilgrim’s Rest. This 2,000 Kw power station was at its time the largest hydro-electric power station in the Southern Hemisphere and Pilgrim’s Rest was electrified before the City of London. The Blyde River Hydro Power Project entails the design, engineering and commissioning of a new hydro-power station to generate renewable green energy to be supplied the surrounding tourism attractions and adjacent communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sekhukhune II and the Pedi Operations Ofthe Anglo-Boer War, 1899-1902
    Pedi operations Sekhukhune II and the Pedi Operations ofthe Anglo-Boer War, 1899-1902 Felix Malunga' Introduction In this paper an attempt will be made to demonstrate how the Pedi under the leadership of Sekhukhune II took advantage of wartime conditions during the Anglo - Boer War to reshape the pattern of colonial relations imposed on them by the Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek, to attempt to re-establish the dominance of the Sekhukhune House in the eastern Transvaal and to negotiate favourable terms with the occupying British military forces once the ZAR was defeated. It will also be shown that often Sekhukhune II deliberately followed a policy of not eliminating republican govemment officials, Boer farmers and their families as well as the Berlin missionaries in order not to antagonise the British and Boer military authorities against him. However, Sekhukhune II subjected all these groups to frequent harassment. Another primary aim of Sekhukhune II was to concentrate on punishing "sell-out usurpers" of the Pedi paramountcy who had betrayed the Pedi polity by pledging allegiance to Abel Erasmus, the Native Commissioner, who had represented Boer hegemony over the Pedi between 1881 and 1899. Again, Sekhukhune II punished Pedi Christian converts of the Berlin missionary society who had abandoned and undermined Pedi traditions and culture by converting and adhering to Christian principles. In this respect, a number of Berlin mission stations became battlefields of the warring Pedi factions. In the process these mission stations were neutralised as centres of the Berlin missionary activities. It was only after 1902 that attempts were made by the missionary authorities to rebuild these mission stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro-Institutional Mapping in the Steelpoort River Basin, South Africa
    WORKING PAPER 17 Hydro-Institutional Mapping in the Steelpoort River Basin, South Africa South Africa Working Paper No. 6 Chris Stimie Olifants river basin NOTHERN PROVINCE Eric Richters Steelpoort river basin Olifants river basin Hubert Thompson E U Q Sylvain Perret I B M A Mampiti Matete Z Steelpoort river basin O M Khabbab Abdallah MPUMALANGA Joseph Kau NORTH-WEST and Postal Address Elvis Mulibana P O Box 2075 REPUBLIC OF Colombo GAUTENG SOUTH AFRICA Sri Lanka Study Area SWAZILAND Republic of South Location Africa 127, Sunil Mawatha Pelawatta Battaramulla Sri Lanka Telephone 94-1-867404, 869080 Fax 94-1-866854 E-mail [email protected] Website www.iwmi.org SM SM IWMI is a Future Harvest Center supported by the CGIAR Working Paper 17 South Africa Working Paper No. 6 Hydro-Institutional Mapping in the Steelpoort River Basin, South Africa Authors Chris Stimie, Eric Richters, Hubert Thompson and Sylvain Perret Coauthors Mampiti Matete, Khabbab Abdallah, Joseph Kau and Elvis Mulibana International Water Management Institute IWMI receives its principal funding from 58 governments, private foundations, and international and regional organizations known as the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Support is also given by the Governments of Pakistan, South Africa and Sri Lanka. The research reported in this working paper was carried out as part of the Research Program on Institutional Support Systems for Sustainable Local Management of Irrigation in Water-Short Basins. IWMI gratefully acknowledges the support provided by the German Government’s Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Improving the Assessment and Implementation of the Reserve
    Towards improving the assessment and implementation of the Reserve: Real-time assessment and implementation of the Ecological Reserve Final report WRC project K8/881/2 March 2011 Sharon Pollard1 Stephen Mallory2 Edward Riddell3 Tendai Sawunyama2 1 Association for Water & Rural Development (AWARD) 2 Water for Africa (IWR Water Resources) 3 University of KwaZulu-Natal Water Research Commission Executive Summary When the Olifants River in north-east South Africa ceased flowing in 2005, widespread calls were made for an integrated focus on all of the easterly-flowing rivers of the lowveld of South Africa. These are the Luvuvhu, Letaba, Olifants, Sabie-Sand, Crocodile and Komati Rivers in Water Management Areas 2,4 and 5. Most of these rivers appeared to be deteriorating in terms of water quantity and quality despite the 1998 National Water Act (NWA). As most of the rivers flow through Kruger National Park (KNP) and all of them form part of international systems the implications of their degradation were profound and of international significance (Pollard and du Toit 2010). The aims of this study were to assess the state of compliance with the Ecological Reserve (ER) – as a benchmark for sustainability - in these rivers and some of their tributaries. It also explored the problems associated with an assessment of compliance. In short these include the lack of planning and integration of ER determination methods with operations and the difficulties associated with real-time predictions of ER requirements. These factors severely constrain planning, monitoring and the management action to mitigate non-compliance. In South Africa, the ER is defined as a function of the natural flow which, because the natural flow in a system is not known at any point in time, is creating problems with real-time implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Impact Assessment
    HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 38(8) OF THE NHRA (No. 25 OF 1999) FOR THE PROPOSED BOOYSENDAL SOUTH, PHASE 2 EXPANSION PROJECT, STEELPOORT, LIMPOPO & MPUMALANGA PROVINCE Type of development: Mining development Client: Wood Plc Client info: Amanda Pyper E – mail: [email protected] Developer: Booysendal Platinum (Pty) Ltd . HCAC - Heritage Consultants Report Author: Private Bag X 1049 Mr. J. van der Walt Suite 34 Project Reference: Modimolle HCAC Project number 218303 0510 Report date: Tel: 082 373 8491 March 2018 Fax: 086 691 6461 E-Mail: [email protected] 1 HIA – Booysendal South Expansion EMP Amendment March 2018 APPROVAL PAGE Project Name Booysendal South Expansion Environmental Authorisations and EMP Amendment Report Title Heritage Impact Assessment Booysendal South Expansion Environmental Authorisations and EMP Amendment Authority Reference Number SAHRA Case Number 11329 Report Status Draft Report Applicant Name Booysendal Platinum (Pty) Ltd Name Signature Qualifications and Date Certifications Archaeologist MA Archaeology March Jaco van der Walt ASAPA #159 2018 APHP # 0114 Archaeologist BA Hons Marko Hutten Jan 2018 Archaeology HCAC 2 HIA – Booysendal South Expansion EMP Amendment March 2018 DOCUMENT PROGRESS Distribution List Date Report Reference Number Document Distribution Number of Copies 9 March 2018 218303 Wood PLC Electronic Copy Amendments on Document Date Report Reference Number Description of Amendment HCAC 3 HIA – Booysendal South Expansion EMP Amendment March 2018 INDEMNITY AND CONDITIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Fishes in the Elands River, Mpumalanga, South Africa: Past, Present and Future
    Page 1 of 8 Original Research Conservation of fishes in the Elands River, Mpumalanga, South Africa: Past, present and future Authors: In an isolated reach, between two large natural waterfalls in the Elands River in Mpumalanga, 1,2 Gordon C. O’Brien populations of a critically endangered Kneria sp., the endangered Chiloglanis bifurcus and a Nico J. Smit1 genetically unique population of Labeobarbus polylepis occur. The aim of this article was to Victor Wepener1 evaluate past efforts to conserve these fishes, describe the current status and propose future Affiliations: conservation and management actions. The population status assessments were based on a 1Unit for Environmental series of fish community composition and population structure evaluations from surveys Sciences and Management, undertaken at 22 sites during seven surveys from 2002 to 2006. Although water-use activities North-West University, South Africa have continued to increase in the area, impacts have been offset by conservation efforts initiated almost 30 years ago. The existing C. bifurcus population appears to be stable, which 2Department of Zoology, is reflected in the downgrading of the conservation status of the species from critically University of Johannesburg, endangered to endangered. The abundance of the kneriid population appears to be increasing South Africa and spreading to other tributaries in the study area. The abundance of L. polylepis appears to Correspondence to: be increasing but has still not reached historical levels. Gordon O’Brien Conservation implications: Continued conservation efforts are required to protect these Email: fishes. This case study presented a rare example of how the impacts associated with the use of [email protected] aquatic resources in South Africa can successfully be offset by conservation efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Klaserie Eco School Pitlochry 14 KU.Pdf
    Phase 1 Archaeological and Heritage Impact Assessment on a Portion of the farm Pitlochry 14 KU in respect of the proposed construction of a School, Klaserie, Mpumalanga Province. Compiled by: For Henwood Environmental Services Surveyor: Mr JP Celliers 4 February, 2019 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Terms of reference ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Project overview ........................................................................................................... 3 1.1.2. Constraints and limitations ........................................................................................... 3 1.2. Legislative Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1. Heritage in Protected areas .......................................................................................... 5 1.3. Approach and statutory requirements ................................................................................. 6 2. Description of surveyed area .................................................................................................... 6 3. Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 7 3.1. Archaeological and Archival background studies ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme 25 Year Publication
    WWF-MONDI WETLANDS PROGRammE B A quarter century of C wetlandconservation 1 Dragonflies are indicators of healthy wetlands. © PETER ChaDwiCK What’s in a name? Over the course of its 25-year journey, the now WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme has changed its name three times. 1991–2000: 2013–present: Rennies Wetland Project WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme The programme was named after the Rennies In late 2013, the management and implementation Group – the primary funder at the start – and was of the programme was transferred from WESSA managed and implemented by Ezemvelo KZN to WWF-SA. It formed an integral part of the new Wildlife (then the Natal Parks Board) from 1991 to global partnership between WWF and Mondi 1995, with WESSA taking over in 1996. and was formally renamed the WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme. 2001–2012: WWF and Mondi acknowledge and thank all the Mondi Wetlands Programme previous funders and conservation management The programme’s name changed in 2001 when agencies for their roles and contributions in Mondi became the primary funder. WESSA was initiating, shaping and growing the success of still the lead management agency, with strategic the programme. support from WWF-SA in guiding the programme and expanding its global reach. In this publication, the programme is referred to by its current name, i.e. the WWF-Mondi Wetlands Programme (WWF-MWP). 2 Foreword 12 Supporting the wise use of communal wetlands 36 Message from Morné du Plessis CEO: WWF-SA 4 13 Growing young wetland and environmental professionals through Message from Ron
    [Show full text]