Balsam Lake Long Range Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Balsam Lake Long Range Plan Bone Lake Comprehensive Lake Management Plan Bone Lake Management District June 2015 Plan Writing and Facilitation Harmony Environmental Tributary and Lake Modeling Ecological Integrity Services Board of Commissioners Bob Murphy Phil Foster Karen Engelbretson Mike Musial Patricia Schmidt Ron Ogren Lake Management Committees Lake Management Plan Wildlife and Natural Beauty Phil Foster, Chair Karen Engelbretson, Chair Cris Dueholm Watershed Wayne Wolsey Ann Miller, Chair Phil Foster Evaluation/Studies Bob Singer Bob Boyd, Chair Lyn and Cris Dueholm Waterfront John McCall Alex Chorewycz, Chair Mary Chorewycz Fisheries Cris Dueholm Mike Belich, Co-chair Phil Foster Bob Boyd, co-chair Bob and Sherri Singer Jan Belich Dave Smith Dan Boyd Noah Boyd Lake Monitoring Dave Boyd Bob Boyd, Chair Duane Butler Jan and Mike Belich Joe Cunningham Cris and Lyn Dueholm George Hess Cindy and Dale Gardner Jack Lachenmayer Gail Heller Ron and Mary Lachenmayer Kathleen and Tim Killeen Tom Lachenmayer Norma and Jack Lanners Kirk Larson Dick Mackie Andy McNattin Tony Manns Joel Starky Bob and Sherri Singer Glen Wahman Todd Sturgeon Jim Widen AIS Bob Boyd, Chair Dick Mackie Advisors Katelin Holm Polk County Land & Water Resources Jeremy Williamson Polk County Land & Water Resources Alex Smith Department of Natural Resources Bone Lake Management District Web Site: www.bonelakewi.com/ ii Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Mission Statement............................................................................................... 1 Bone Lake Management Goals ................................................................................... 1 Bone Lake Aquatic Plant Management Goals ............................................................ 1 Needs Assessment ........................................................................................................... 3 Public Opinion Survey ................................................................................................ 3 Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee ................................................................. 4 Public Review ............................................................................................................. 4 Population Dynamics .................................................................................................. 5 Bone Lake Overview ...................................................................................................... 6 The Lake ..................................................................................................................... 6 Bone Lake Water Quality ........................................................................................... 7 Watershed ................................................................................................................. 10 Phosphorus Loading to Bone Lake ......................................................................... 15 Targeting Phosphorus Reduction .............................................................................. 16 Rare and Endangered Species Habitat ...................................................................... 24 Bone Lake Fishery .................................................................................................... 25 Wildlife ..................................................................................................................... 28 Lake Management ......................................................................................................... 31 Lake Management Activities .................................................................................... 31 Bone Lake Management Implementation Plan ............................................................. 44 Funding Plan Implementation ................................................................................... 54 Appendices Appendix A. Public Opinion Survey Results ......................................................... A-1 Appendix B. Basic Limnology – Understanding Lake Information ....................... B-1 Appendix C. Summaries of Previous Water Quality Studies ................................. C-1 Appendix D. Plan Implementation 2015-2017 ...................................................... D-1 Appendix E. References .......................................................................................... E-1 iii List of Figures Figure 1. What recreational activities do you enjoy at Bone Lake? ................................... 3 Figure 2. What is your degree of concern associated with each issue listed? .................... 4 Figure 3. New Septic Permits: within the Bone Lake Management District ...................... 5 Figure 4. Bone Lake Map ................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5. Bone Lake Deep Hole Secchi Depths 1990-2014 ............................................... 8 Figure 6. Bone Lake South of Island Secchi Depths 1999-2014 ........................................ 8 Figure 7. Trophic Status Index Bone Lake Deep Hole 1973-2014 ..................................... 9 Figure 8. Secchi Depths Bone Lake Deep Hole 2014 ........................................................ 9 Figure 9. Bone Lake Watersheds ...................................................................................... 11 Figure 10. Land Use in Bone Lake Watershed ................................................................. 12 Figure 11. Composition of Bone Lake Watershed Land Use ........................................... 13 Figure 12. Watershed Phosphorus Loading by Land Use ................................................. 13 Figure 13. Phosphorus Load by Subwatershed ................................................................. 14 Figure 14. Bone Lake Phosphorus Loading 2010 ............................................................. 15 Figure 15. Shoreline Composition at the Ordinary High Water Mark ............................. 22 Figure 16. Shoreland Buffer Composition ........................................................................ 23 Figure 17. Green Frog (Rana clamitans) ........................................................................... 29 Figure 18. Wildlife and Habitat around Bone Lake Map ................................................. 30 Figure 19. Potentially Suitable Locations for Rain Gardens ............................................ 34 Figure 20. Familiarity with Practices to Reduce Waterfront Runoff ................................ 37 List of Tables Table 1. Sources of Phosphorus to Bone Lake ................................................................. 15 Table 2. Waterfront Runoff Mitigation Progress to Date (2010 to 2014) ........................ 18 Table 3. Curly Leaf Pondweed Treatment History (2010 to 2014) .................................. 20 Table 4. Bone Lake and Georgetown Natural Heritage Inventory Sensitive Species ...... 24 Table 5. Factors Motivating Installation of Practices to Reduce Waterfront Runoff ....... 38 Table 6. Grants for Plan Implementation .......................................................................... 54 iv Introduction This comprehensive lake management plan guides the activities of the Bone Lake Management District. It was originally developed by the Lake District and approved by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in 2009. This current, updated plan will be implemented over a ten year period from 2015 through 2024. Plan Mission Statement Bone Lake is a precious resource and one of the premier recreational lakes in this area. The overall mission of this comprehensive lake management plan is to maintain the health of Bone Lake to support clean water, natural beauty, recreation, and sport fishing for decades to come. Bone Lake Management Goals The following goals will guide the Lake District management efforts for Bone Lake. 1. Improve Bone Lake water clarity. 2. Maintain safe navigation in Bone Lake. 3. Protect and improve the Bone Lake fishery. 4. Maintain and enhance Bone Lake’s natural beauty. 5. Protect and enhance wildlife habitat. An aquatic plant management plan was prepared for Bone Lake in 2008 and updated in 2013. Aquatic plant management goals were developed in 2008 and reviewed with no changes made in 2013. Bone Lake Aquatic Plant Management Goals Goal 1. Maintain recreational uses important to lake residents and users including swimming, fishing, and boating while balancing the need to preserve important native aquatic plant functions and their values. Goal 2. Prevent the introduction of Eurasian water milfoil and other invasive aquatic plants. Goal 3. Manage curly leaf pondweed to minimize navigation problems, prevent its spread, and protect native plant populations. Goal 4. Protect the natural functions of diverse native plants including fish and waterfowl habitat, sediment stabilization, protection against invasion by non-native species, and natural aesthetics. Goal 5. Educate lake residents and visitors about the role of aquatic plants in the lake, the management strategies found in the plan, and appropriate plant management actions. 1 The Bone Lake Management District The Bone Lake Management District (the District) was formed in 1977. A Bone Lake Association had been in place prior to lake district formation since approximately 1965. A public inland lake protection and rehabilitation district is a special
Recommended publications
  • Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, Available Online, from Your License Distributor, Or Any DNR Service Center
    Wisconsin Fishing.. it's fun and easy! To use this pamphlet, follow these 5 easy steps: Restrictions: Be familiar with What's New on page 4 and the License Requirements 1 and Statewide Fishing Restrictions on pages 8-11. Trout fishing: If you plan to fish for trout, please see the separate inland trout 2 regulations booklet, Guide to Wisconsin Trout Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, available online, from your license distributor, or any DNR Service Center. Special regulations: Check for special regulations on the water you will be fishing 3 in the section entitled Special Regulations-Listed by County beginning on page 28. Great Lakes, Winnebago System Waters, and Boundary Waters: If you are 4 planning to fish on the Great Lakes, their tributaries, Winnebago System waters or waters bordering other states, check the appropriate tables on pages 64–76. Statewide rules: If the water you will be fishing is not found in theSpecial Regulations- 5 Listed by County and is not a Great Lake, Winnebago system, or boundary water, statewide rules apply. See the regulation table for General Inland Waters on pages 62–63 for seasons, length and bag limits, listed by species. ** This pamphlet is an interpretive summary of Wisconsin’s fishing laws and regulations. For complete fishing laws and regulations, including those that are implemented after the publica- tion of this pamphlet, consult the Wisconsin State Statutes Chapter 29 or the Administrative Code of the Department of Natural Resources. Consult the legislative website - http://docs. legis.wi.gov - for more information. For the most up-to-date version of this pamphlet, go to dnr.wi.gov search words, “fishing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting the Occurrence of Stunted Bluegill Populations
    PREDICTING THE OCCURRENCE OF STUNTED BLUEGILL POPULATIONS FROM WISCONSIN LAKE FEATURES By Jennifer Marie Hurt A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN NATURAL RESOURCES (FISHERIES) College of Natural Resources UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN Stevens Point, Wisconsin December 2007 Al'l'ROVED BY'l'HECRADU:\TE COM\fiTTF.F. OF: D:. :\.fic,1ac. J. J-fo.u~n, Cormma::e Ch~1n:,~n l)rofcssor ofFish~i~ Collr,gr. ofN°a!'l.uat Resomcei !'j,') !ti,t, IL/ "I>" . -1,_~- Ji?.:v,,:>.- D,. R.ob"1t .'.:Holsm,:o A~,;i~la;1l Pn,feoesor ofCOilServatio."l Lat\• .:.nd '\','jltl!if~ n::lci(C of)1J~t1m1l ltr.SCl'l!J'Qa~ ---~v.1. .O..:."' ...r~/""/,;e.=_- ---­ ~nc:y A. N~t('\ Fishec jes D;llahH.:;c Coor,!:ruitc1J: ·~V!3co!lSjn De1>arlmc:11l orN;:.(urai Rc:;ou·.-r,r:5 ABSTRACT Bluegill stunting (poor growth and small size) is a fishery management problem in Wisconsin. Wisconsin has over 15,000 lakes and surveying each lake is not feasible due to lack of resources (personnel, money and time). Classifying lakes based on ecological and limnological similarities may provide a way to account for differences among lakes without having to survey all lakes. My objective was to classify stunted and non-stunted bluegill populations using features of Wisconsin lakes. Before I addressed my main objective, two subordinate objectives were addressed to establish data needs and define a stunted bluegill population for Wisconsin lakes. First, I determined if size selectivity of bluegills differed between electrofishing and Fyke netting in Wisconsin lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Half Moon Lake, Polk County, Wisconsin 2001
    Balsam Lake Treaty Assessment Survey Polk County, Wisconsin (MWBIC: 2620600) By Heath M. Benike Senior Fisheries Biologist Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Northern Region-Barron April, 2010 1 Executive Summary Balsam Lake, located in central Polk County in Balsam Lake, Wisconsin was surveyed in 2008-2009 following the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Treaty Assessment protocol. The 2008 adult walleye population for Balsam Lake (1.0 fish/acre) was similar to a 2005 estimate of 0.8 fish/acre but was lower than prior surveys from 1987-2002. The relative abundance of largemouth bass was high at 223 fish/hr. Largemouth bass growth and size structure have decreased compared to previous surveys in 1998 and 1988. Mean length of bluegill harvested in 2008 was 8.1 inches, compared to 7.6 inches in 2005. Management recommendations call for changes in walleye stocking and regulation changes for walleye and largemouth bass. 2 Introduction Balsam Lake is a 2,054 acre drainage lake located in central Polk County, in the Village of Balsam Lake, Wisconsin. A dam is present on the outlet of Balsam Lake which artificially raises water levels approximately 29 feet. The maximum water depth of Balsam Lake is 37 feet. Rice and Harder Creeks enter Balsam Lake. The outlet of Balsam Lake is named Balsam Branch which flows southward to Lake Wapogassett. Balsam Lake has a diverse fishery consisting of walleye Sander vitreus, northern pike Esox lucius, largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides, smallmouth bass, M. dolomieui, as well as bluegill Lepomis macrochirus, black crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus, pumpkinseed L. gibbosus, yellow perch Perca flavescens, green sunfish L.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Red Cedar Chain of Lakes Treaty Assessment Survey Barron And
    Red Cedar Chain of Lakes Treaty Assessment Survey Barron and Washburn Counties, Wisconsin 2005-2006 MWBIC ( 2109600, 2109800, 2112800) Heath M. Benike Senior Fisheries Biologist Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Northern Region-Barron April, 2008 1 Executive Summary The Red Cedar Chain of Lakes was surveyed in 2005-2006 following the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Treaty Assessment Protocol. Projected angler effort for all species of fish was 40.8 hours per acre. Walleye abundance in 2005 was estimated at 2.2 adult fish per acre. This is a 25% and 44% decline when compared to past surveys in 1992 and 1980. At this time, angler harvest rates appear to be limiting the abundance of walleye in the Red Cedar Chain. A walleye regulation change is recommended to increase the abundance of walleye in the Red Cedar Chain and restore adult walleye densities to 4.0 fish per acre. Smallmouth bass were more common (2.5 adult fish per acre) than largemouth bass (1.7 adult fish per acre) on Red Cedar Lake. However, the size structure of largemouth bass was better based on Relative Stock Density values. Largemouth bass densities should remain low and anglers are encouraged to harvest largemouth bass in the 14-16 inch size range to minimize any potential secondary impacts to the walleye population. Smallmouth bass and northern pike densities should remain stable and each provides a desirable fishery at this time. Several concerns were noted with the panfish community. Bluegill harvest rates were very high on Hemlock Lake and a decline in the abundance of yellow perch was documented on Red Cedar Lake.
    [Show full text]