August 2008 LONDON BOROUGH of LAMBETH RETAIL STUDY CL11482/PW/Spe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

August 2008 LONDON BOROUGH of LAMBETH RETAIL STUDY CL11482/PW/Spe LONDON BOROUGH OF LAMBETH RETAIL STUDY CL11482/PW/SPe August 2008 Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd 14 Regent’s Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL T 020 7837 4477 Offices also in: F 020 7837 2277 Cardiff [email protected] Manchester www.nlpplanning.com Newcastle upon Tyne CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 The Study..................................................................................................................... 1 Content of the Report................................................................................................... 1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL LEISURE TRENDS........................... 3 Retail Trends................................................................................................................ 3 Leisure Trends ............................................................................................................. 5 3.0 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT.................................................................................. 6 National Policy ............................................................................................................. 6 The London Plan........................................................................................................ 13 Sub-Regional Planning Framework ........................................................................... 15 Local Planning Context .............................................................................................. 16 4.0 THE SHOPPING HIERARCHY AND CATCHMENT AREA...................................... 21 The Shopping Hierarchy ............................................................................................ 21 Socio-Economic Characteristics within Lambeth ....................................................... 25 The Designation of the Borough’s Network of Shopping Centres.............................. 29 Summary and Conclusions ........................................................................................ 35 5.0 HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ............................................................................................ 36 Survey Structure ........................................................................................................ 36 Food and Grocery Shopping...................................................................................... 37 Non-Food Shopping................................................................................................... 38 Internet Shopping....................................................................................................... 43 Improvements to Town Centres................................................................................. 44 Brixton Market............................................................................................................ 45 Leisure Activities ........................................................................................................ 45 Key Messages from the Household Survey Results.................................................. 48 6.0 BUSINESS OCCUPIER PERCEPTIONS.................................................................. 50 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 50 Length of Trading in Current Location ....................................................................... 50 Property Tenure and Ownership................................................................................ 51 Future Property Requirements................................................................................... 51 Trading Performance ................................................................................................. 53 Factors Constraining Businesses............................................................................... 55 Strengths and Weaknesses of the Town Centre........................................................ 57 Perceived Planning Issues for the Future of Town Centres....................................... 60 Key Messages from the Occupier Survey.................................................................. 62 7.0 BRIXTON MAJOR TOWN CENTRE ......................................................................... 63 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 63 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation................................................................. 63 Brixton Markets .......................................................................................................... 67 Accessibility and Movement....................................................................................... 68 Environmental Quality................................................................................................ 70 Summary of Brixton’s Strengths and Weaknesses.................................................... 73 LON\R11482-09 (FINAL).doc 8.0 STREATHAM MAJOR TOWN CENTRE................................................................... 74 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 74 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation................................................................. 74 Accessibility and Movement....................................................................................... 78 Environmental Quality................................................................................................ 80 Summary of Streatham’s Strengths and Weaknesses............................................... 82 9.0 CLAPHAM HIGH STREET DISTRICT CENTRE....................................................... 83 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 83 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation................................................................. 83 Accessibility and Movement....................................................................................... 86 Environmental Quality................................................................................................ 87 Summary of Clapham High Street’s Strengths and Weaknesses.............................. 89 10.0 WEST NORWOOD DISTRICT CENTRE................................................................... 90 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 90 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation................................................................. 90 Accessibility and Movement....................................................................................... 93 Environmental Quality................................................................................................ 94 Summary of West Norwood’s Strengths and Weaknesses........................................ 95 11.0 STOCKWELL DISTRICT CENTRE........................................................................... 97 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 97 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation................................................................. 97 Accessibility and Movement....................................................................................... 99 Environmental Quality.............................................................................................. 101 Summary of Stockwell District Centre’s Strengths and Weaknesses ...................... 102 12.0 WATERLOO DISTRICT CENTRE........................................................................... 103 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 103 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation............................................................... 103 Accessibility and Movement..................................................................................... 106 Environmental Quality.............................................................................................. 107 Summary of Waterloo District Centre’s Strengths and Weaknesses....................... 109 13.0 NORBURY DISTRICT CENTRE.............................................................................. 111 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 111 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation............................................................... 111 Accessibility and Movement..................................................................................... 114 Environmental Quality.............................................................................................. 115 Summary of Norbury District Centre’s Strengths and Weaknesses......................... 116 14.0 HERNE HILL DISTRICT CENTRE .......................................................................... 117 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 117 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation............................................................... 117 Accessibility and Movement....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Waterloo Building Height Study, 2018
    Waterloo Building Height Study, 2018 1. Introduction 1.1 This study has been undertaken to inform Lambeth’s approach to tall buildings in Waterloo as part of the Lambeth Local Plan Review, 2018. 2. Background The Waterloo Opportunity Area 2.1 The London Plan identifies Waterloo as an Opportunity Area and the objectives are outlined in the Mayor’s Waterloo Opportunity Area Planning Framework (2007) which include: ‘Development potential in the area should be maximised given Waterloo’s status as an opportunity Area and its location within the Central Activities Zone and to accord with the strategy of providing the highest levels of activity at locations with the greatest transport capacity’. 2.2 The OAPF identified two broad areas suitable for tall building – above and around the station and on the commercial spine behind the Riverside (Belvedere Road and Upper Ground) – based in part on the presence of tall buildings in these locations already. The associated illustrations generally show a cluster of tall buildings over Waterloo Station which would be delivered as part of a station redevelopment which would push the passenger concourse to ground level allowing the platforms to be extended. 2.3 The OAPF recognises the need for development to respond to this sensitive context: ‘Additionally, development potential has to be tempered against the normal impacts of development assessed by the planning system including the impact on character areas and on local and strategic views’. (OAPF page 99). 2.4 Figure 49 identifies five areas of possible development within and around the railway station: 1. Elizabeth House and surrounds, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • De'borah Passes the 1,2,3 Test
    Imagine Croydon – we’re Who is the all-time Top tips to keep offering you the chance top Wembley scorer your home safe from to influence the way our at Selhurst Park? unwanted visitors borough develops Page 8 Page 12 Page 2 Issue 28 - April 2009 yourYour community newspaper from your councilcroydonwww.croydon.gov.uk Wandle Park lands £400,000 jackpot Residents’ vote brings cash bonanza to fund community improvements. The Friends of Wandle River Wandle – returning The £400,000 brings the Park are jumping for joy surface water to the total funding for the park to at having won £400,000 town for the first time £1.4m, adding to the £1m from the Mayor of London in 40 years and bringing funding secured from the to give their favourite open social and environmental Barratt Homes development space a radical makeover. benefits to the area. adjoining the park. And the money comes Restoration of the Mark Thomas, chairman thanks to the fantastic Wandle, a tributary of the Friends of Wandle response of residents to of the Thames, will Park, said: “It’s great to the call for them to vote see the forming of see that all the work that and help bring the much- an adjoining lake. we put into promoting needed funding to Croydon. Other enhancements the potential of our local Wandle Park gained planned for Wandle park has paid off. the second highest number Park include sprucing “We look forward to of votes in London, with up the skate park and working with the council 5,371 people supporting it.
    [Show full text]
  • Trader Terms and Conditions 2019 - 2020
    Trader Terms and conditions 2019 - 2020 1 Contents Trader information ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Requirements to trade ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Compliance Documents ................................................................................................................................ 4 Regulations and Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 5 Opening hours ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Deposit and Payments .................................................................................................................................. 6 Pitch & Canopy .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Fees ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Customer payment method ......................................................................................................................... 7 Policy for augmenting menus ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Tremblay Auteur
    MICHEL TREMBLAY AUTEUR NOTES BIOGRAPHIQUES Figure dominante du théâtre québécois depuis la fin des années 1960, Michel Tremblay s'est aussi imposé comme romancier, traducteur, adaptateur et scénariste. Né dans un quartier populaire de l'est de Montréal, il découvre très tôt sa vocation d'écrivain. Dès ses études secondaires, il écrit des poèmes, des pièces de théâtre, des romans. À l’adolescence, il entreprend la rédaction de contes fantastiques qu'il réunit plus tard en un recueil : Contes pour buveurs attardés. À 18 ans, il s'inscrit à l'Institut des Arts graphiques, où il apprend le métier de linotypiste, qu’il exerce de 1963 à 1966. En 1964, Michel Tremblay soumet une pièce, Le train, au concours des Jeunes auteurs de Radio-Canada : il y remporte le premier prix. La même année, il rencontre André Brassard qui deviendra le metteur en scène de presque toutes ses pièces, jusqu’en 2003. En 1965, André Brassard utilise quelques-uns des Contes pour buveurs attardés dans un spectacle consacré à la littérature fantastique : Messe noire. La même année, Michel Tremblay écrit Les belles-sœurs. Après la lecture publique des Belles-sœurs le 4 mars 1968 au Centre d’essai des auteurs dramatiques, la pièce est créée au Théâtre du Rideau Vert, le 28 août 1968. Elle connaît alors un succès retentissant, au point d’avoir fait l’objet de près de 600 productions au Québec et à l'étranger. Écrites en joual, un registre de langue propre à Montréal, Les belles-sœurs donnent une vision renouvelée du quartier ouvrier où est né Tremblay.
    [Show full text]
  • LABAN THEATRELABAN Trinity Laban Conservatoire of Music & Dance
    LABAN TRINITY Laban CONSERVatOIRE OF MUSIC & DANCE THEATRE MUSICAL THEATRE STUDENTS PRESENT: FRI 2 & SAT 3 DEC 14.30h & 19.30h THE CLOCKMAKer’S DAUGHTER An original faerytale musical by Michael Webborn and Daniel Finn PROGRAMME £3 THE CLOCKMAKER’S DAUGHTER Presented by Trinity Laban final year Musical Theatre students. This production is presented by special arrangement with Webborn and Finn. Director Michael Howcroft Musical Director Tony Castro Choreographer Jenny Arnold Set and Costume Designer Amy Yardley Lighting Designer Chloe Kenward The Clockmaker’s Daughter was originally produced by Theatrica Limited at the Landor Theatre. Directed by Robert McWhir Choreographed by Robbie O’Reilly Designed by David Shields Lighting by Richard Lambert Executive Producer Clive Chenery SYNOPSIS Spindlewood, like most towns of age, has its traditions. But no practice, custom, or Old Wives Warning is so firmly adhered to as ‘The Turning of the Key’. Every year, on the last night of winter, as the first day of spring unfolds, the townsfolk gather to take part in a strange ritual. They meet in the centre of the town square, where a statue bearing the likeness of a young girl stands, poised and still, one hand raised as if to toast the sky. Constance has stood in the square for as long as any can remember. And she is never more lifelike than tonight. CREATIVE TEAM BAND Director Lighting Designer Piano/Musical Director Michael Howcroft Chloe Kenward Tony Castro Musical Director Costume Supervisor Violin Tony Castro Cristiano Casimiro Rosie Judge Choreographer
    [Show full text]
  • Visioning West Norwood and Tulse Hill Introduction
    Visioning West Norwood and Tulse Hill Introduction Visioning West Norwood and Tulse Hill: Have your Say! The Lambeth Local Plan 2015 sets out planning policies for Lambeth to guide growth in Projects housing, jobs, infrastructure delivery, place-shaping and the quality of the built environment over the next 15 years to 2030. Together with the London Plan, it forms the development plan Delivered for the borough. The spatial strategy and strategic objectives for West Norwood and Tulse Hill are set out in Policies PN7 and ED1 of the Local Plan. PN7 promotes the role of West Norwood as a vibrant district centre through the development of key sites. The area includes West Norwood Commercial Area to the south, which is designated as ‘Key Industrial Business Areas’ (KIBAs) by ED1. The Council is preparing a Masterplan for the West Norwood and Tulse Hill area to expand on the guidance in the Local Plan and provide a framework for managing change and development in this area. A Masterplan is a framework. It sets out key principles of an area, and creates a vision for its future. It shows the overall development concept that includes urban design, landscaping, infrastructure, service provision, present and future land uses and built form. This work will provide the evidence for the Local Plan Review that is currently underway. Through this piece of work, we are developing four interlinked documents to Interlinked documents: guide growth and investment in future years. • An Economic Vision for West Norwood & Tulse Hill to guide economic growth and
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Lambeth (2550)
    Statement to the Examination in Public of the Draft London Plan 2017 (as modified August 2018) Matter 88 – Town Centre Network London Borough of Lambeth (2550) – 1 March 2019 Is the town centre network set out in the Plan justified and would it be effective in ensuring that identified needs for main town centre use developments are met in appropriate locations in accordance with national policy? 1. Lambeth’s representation on this matter relates to the classification of Waterloo in the London Plan town centre hierarchy. At present, only Lower Marsh/The Cut is recognised as a CAZ retail cluster. In Lambeth’s view, this does not adequately reflect the scale of existing and emerging main town centre uses or Waterloo’s potential for further investment and therefore does not provide an effective means to plan for and monitor the centre going forward. Lambeth believes a larger Waterloo CAZ retail cluster should be identified, to complement other London Plan designations for the area and to allow for more effective local policy for Waterloo and the Southbank to come forward through the current review of the Lambeth Local Plan. Proposed classifications in the Draft London Plan (with suggested modifications August 2018) (DLP) 2. The wider Waterloo and Southbank area has the following classifications in the DLP: Entirely within the Central Activities Zone (CAZ) Waterloo Opportunity Area (characterised as ‘maturing’ with remaining potential for 1,500 homes and 6,000 jobs; the capacity identified in the current London Plan 2016 is 2,500 homes and
    [Show full text]
  • N109 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    N109 bus time schedule & line map N109 Oxford Circus - Croydon Town Centre View In Website Mode The N109 bus line (Oxford Circus - Croydon Town Centre) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Croydon Town Centre: 12:40 AM - 4:10 AM (2) Oxford Circus: 12:41 AM - 4:21 AM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest N109 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next N109 bus arriving. Direction: Croydon Town Centre N109 bus Time Schedule 62 stops Croydon Town Centre Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:40 AM - 4:20 AM Monday 12:40 AM - 4:10 AM Oxford Circus Stn / Margaret Street (RF) 290 Regent Street, London Tuesday 12:40 AM - 4:10 AM Oxford Circus Station (RG) Wednesday 12:40 AM - 4:10 AM Upper Regent Street, London Thursday 12:40 AM - 4:10 AM Conduit Street / Hamleys Toy Store (T) Friday 12:40 AM - 4:10 AM 174 Regent Street, London Saturday 12:40 AM - 4:20 AM Piccadilly Circus (F) Regent Street, London Haymarket / Charles II Street (P) 24 Haymarket, London N109 bus Info Direction: Croydon Town Centre Trafalgar Sq / Charing Cross Stn (A) Stops: 62 Cockspur Street, London Trip Duration: 66 min Line Summary: Oxford Circus Stn / Margaret Street Whitehall / Trafalgar Square (M) (RF), Oxford Circus Station (RG), Conduit Street / 33 Whitehall, London Hamleys Toy Store (T), Piccadilly Circus (F), Haymarket / Charles II Street (P), Trafalgar Sq / Whitehall / Horseguards Avenue (P) Charing Cross Stn (A), Whitehall / Trafalgar Square (M), Whitehall / Horseguards Avenue (P), Horse Horse Guards Parade (S) Guards Parade
    [Show full text]
  • NTC-R+J-Programme.Pdf
    Message from the Chairman Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and a warm welcome to the Network Theatre Company's production of Romeo and Juliet . Andy Bradshaw directs, with his inimitable style, a large and experienced cast in this popular Shakespeare play, ably supported by his backstage crew. What a wealth of talent we have in the Network Theatre Company, as you will see from this production. Congratulations to everyone involved. Tonight you will be sitting in a recently refurbished auditorium. Under the guidance of Paul Lunnon, a dedicated crew has removed the old staging and seating rostra, and has replaced them with a new, adaptable layout, making our theatre more comfortable and practical. We, in the NTC, are very grateful for all the hard (and heavy) work undertaken. So, tonight: sit back and enjoy the show (our third production this year). Enjoy the performances, the music, the dancing, and new stage and seating layout. May I also remind you that the Green Room bar is open before and after the show, as well as during the interval, and thank you for your support. Kay Murray Chairman of the Network Theatre Company June 2011 A Word from the Director Staging Romeo and Juliet is a challenge. It has been done and done and done thousands of times. It was not without trepidation therefore, that I approached this production. What, I wondered, could there be done that has not already been done? The answer came, as so many do, in a moment of quiet lucidity: truth... You see, I have seen so many productions of this show I have lost count.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Auction Catalogue Ards Aw Wi a Nn V E a R N •
    LOCAL EXPERTISE | NATIONAL COVERAGE PROPERTY AUCTION CATALOGUE ARDS AW WI A NN V E A R N • THURSDAY 28 FEBRUARY 2019 AT 2:00 pm P • R R A O E THE WESTBURY MAYFAIR HOTEL, 37 CONDUIT STREET P Y E R E MAYFAIR, LONDON W1S 2YF T H Y T A F U O CT E ION HOUS www.networkauctions.co.uk 00875_NA_Cover_FEB 19.indd 3 04/02/2019 12:36 VENUE LOCATION THE WESTBURY MAYFAIR 37 CONDUIT STREET, MAYFAIR, LONDON W1S 2YF Opened in 1955, The Westbury Mayfair is primely located on Bond Street, in the heart of Mayfair’s fashion and arts district. The only hotel to occupy such a prized address, it shares its illustrious position with prestigious boutiques, arts institutions and city landmarks, offering an ideal base from which to explore the individuality and authentic personality of the neighbourhood. Heathrow Express at Paddington Station 3/4 mile Directions: The hotel is situated on Conduit Street between Regent Street and New Bond Street. Valet parking is available, please contact EDGWA R E R O A D the hotel for details. CARNABY STREET ST GEORGE STREET Nearest tube station: N E W B O N D REGENT STREET Oxford Circus BROOK STREET STREET CONDUIT STREET G R E E N S T www.marriott.co.uk | +44 20 7629 7755 GROSVENER STREET W O O D S M E W S UPPER BROOK ST C U L R O S S S T BURTON STREET OLD BOND STREET BERKELEY UPPER GROSVENORPARK STREET ST SQUARE DOVER STREET T 020 7871 0420 | E [email protected] www.networkauctions.co.uk INTRODUCING THE AUCTION TEAM Toby Limbrick Guy Charrison Stuart Elliott FNAVA FRICS, PPNAVA (Hons), FNAEA, FARLA, FRSA FNAVA, MARLA
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Theatre 2006 Survey
    WOMEN IN THEATRE 2006 SURVEY Sphinx Theatre Company 2006 copyright. No part of this survey may be reproduced without permission WOMEN IN THEATRE 2006 SURVEY Sphinx Theatre Company copyright 2006. No part of this survey may be reproduced without permission The comparative employment of men and women as actors, directors and writers in the UK theatre industry, and how new writing features in venues’ programming Period 1: 16 – 29 January 2006 (inclusive) Section A: Actors, Writers, Directors and New Writing. For the two weeks covered in Period 1, there were 140 productions staged at 112 venues. Writers Of the 140 productions there were: 98 written by men 70% 13 written by women 9% 22 mixed collaboration 16% (7 unknown) 5% New Writing 48 of the 140 plays were new writing (34%). Of the 48 new plays: 30 written by men 62% 8 written by women 17% 10 mixed collaboration 21% The greatest volume of new writing was shown at Fringe venues, with 31% of its programme for the specified time period featuring new writing. New Adaptations/ New Translations 9 of the 140 plays were new adaptations/ new translations (6%). Of the 9 new adaptations/ new translations: 5 written by men 0 written by women 4 mixed collaboration 2 WOMEN IN THEATRE 2006 SURVEY Sphinx Theatre Company copyright 2006. No part of this survey may be reproduced without permission Directors 97 male directors 69% 32 female directors 23% 6 mixed collaborations 4% (5 unknown) 4% Fringe theatres employed the most female directors (9 or 32% of Fringe directors were female), while subsidised west end venues employed the highest proportion of female directors (8 or 36% were female).
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2016, London
    London Register 2016 HERITAGE AT RISK 2016 / LONDON Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Greater London 1 Barking and Dagenham 1 Barnet 2 Bexley 5 Brent 5 Bromley 6 Camden 11 City of London 20 Croydon 21 Ealing 24 Enfield 27 Greenwich 30 Hackney 34 Hammersmith and Fulham 40 Haringey 43 Harrow 47 Havering 50 Hillingdon 51 Hounslow 58 Islington 64 Kensington and Chelsea 70 Kingston upon Thames 81 Lambeth 82 Lewisham 91 London Legacy (MDC) 95 Merton 96 Newham 101 Redbridge 103 Richmond upon Thames 104 Southwark 108 Sutton 116 Tower Hamlets 117 Waltham Forest 123 Wandsworth 126 Westminster, City of 129 II London Summary 2016 he Heritage at Risk Register in London reflects the diversity of our capital’s historic environment. It includes 682 buildings and sites known to be at risk from Tneglect, decay or inappropriate development - everything from an early 18th century church designed by Nicholas Hawksmoor, to a boathouse built during WWI on an island in the Thames. These are sites that need imagination and investment. In London the scale of this challenge has grown. There are 12 more assets on the Heritage at Risk Register this year compared to 2015. We also know that it’s becoming more expensive to repair many of our buildings at risk. In the face of these challenges we’re grateful for the help and support of all those who continue to champion our historic environment.
    [Show full text]