The Baseline Concentrations of Methane in Great British Groundwater - the National Methane Baseline Survey Groundwater Science Programme Open Report OR/15/071

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Baseline Concentrations of Methane in Great British Groundwater - the National Methane Baseline Survey Groundwater Science Programme Open Report OR/15/071 The Baseline Concentrations of Methane in Great British Groundwater - the National Methane Baseline Survey Groundwater Science Programme Open Report OR/15/071 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUNDWATER SCIENCE PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/15/071 The Baseline Concentrations of Methane in Great British Groundwater - the National Methane Baseline Survey The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 2015. Ordnance Survey Licence No. 100021290 EUL. R A Bell, Darling, W G, K Manamsa, B É Ó Dochartaigh Keywords Groundwater, Aquifer, Methane. Front cover Methane sampling in Lancashire. Bibliographical reference R A BELL, DARLING, W G, K Manamsa, B É Ó Dochartaigh. 2016. The Baseline Concentrations of Methane in Great British Groundwater - the National Methane Baseline Survey. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/15/071. 45pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2016. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2016 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation. email [email protected] We publish an annual catalogue of our maps and other publications; this catalogue is available online or from any of the Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham BGS shops. NG12 5GG Tel 0115 936 3241 Fax 0115 936 3488 The British Geological Survey carries out the geological survey of email [email protected] Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the latter as an agency service for the government of Northern Ireland), and of the surrounding continental shelf, as well as basic research projects. Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA It also undertakes programmes of technical aid in geology in Tel 0131 667 1000 Fax 0131 668 2683 developing countries. email [email protected] The British Geological Survey is a component body of the Natural Environment Research Council. Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD Tel 020 7589 4090 Fax 020 7584 8270 Tel 020 7942 5344/45 email [email protected] Columbus House, Greenmeadow Springs, Tongwynlais, Cardiff CF15 7NE Tel 029 2052 1962 Fax 029 2052 1963 Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB Tel 01491 838800 Fax 01491 692345 Geological Survey of Northern Ireland, Department of Enterprise, Trade & Investment, Dundonald House, Upper Newtownards Road, Ballymiscaw, Belfast, BT4 3SB Tel 028 9038 8462 Fax 028 9038 8461 www.bgs.ac.uk/gsni/ Parent Body Natural Environment Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN2 1EU Tel 01793 411500 Fax 01793 411501 www.nerc.ac.uk Website www.bgs.ac.uk Shop online at www.geologyshop.com OR/15/071 Acknowledgements We are extremely grateful to BGS members of staff for their help and support during fieldwork, in particular Debbie White, Lindsay Holowka and Mick Strutt. Thanks also go to Pauline Smedley, Marianne Stuart and Rob Ward for their direction and technical advice. In addition to the BGS staff, a large number of individuals in the Environment Agency, Natural Resources Wales (NRW), public water supply companies and private residents have contributed to the project through their assistance with sampling and collection of data. Of the many individuals who have contributed to the project we would particularly like to thank the following: Environment Agency: Laura Pender and Suze Southern (North West); Diane Steele and Andrea Lancaster (North East); Jan Hookey, Lucy Roberts, Polly Wallace (South East); Paula Awty (South); Stephanie Robson (South West); Andrew Pearson (Midlands); Dave Jones (formerly Wales). Natural Resources Wales: Gemma Harris, Kay Roberts, Cath Rees, Jim Hawker Southern Water: Sian Evans, Anthony Anderton, Dave West, Terry Smithson, Meyrick Gough South East Water: Jeanette Sheldon, Christopher Taylor, Harry Shotter Bristol Water: Rebekah Rice, Natasha Clements Sembcorp Bournemouth Water: Tony Read, Tony Primmer, Tim Latcham Portsmouth Water: Jonty Stead, Mark Botterill Wessex Water: Paul Stanfield Yorkshire Water: Mark Morton Northumbrian Water: Dave Kippling Severn Trent: Sid Priestley, Richard Winstanley Sutton and East Surrey Water: Nicola Houlahan Thames Water: Mike Jones, Estelle Ferschneider, Gary Holton, Rose Wilkinson United Utilities: Phil Merrin Affinity (Veolia Water): John Simpson We would also like to thank the owners of privately owned boreholes who allowed us to sample and the University of Birmingham, especially Leon Halwa, for their contributions to the investigation of boreholes in South Wales. i OR/15/071 Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... i Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii Executive summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................................ 2 2 Methane and GB Groundwater ............................................................................................ 4 2.1 Methane and Associated Risks ....................................................................................... 4 2.2 Sources of Methane in Groundwater .............................................................................. 4 3 Survey Methodology .............................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Sampling Methodology .................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Analysis methodology .................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Quarterly Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 8 4 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Regional Summaries ..................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Temporal variation in methane concentrations ............................................................ 28 5 Summary and recommendations ........................................................................................ 33 5.1 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 33 5.2 Recommendations for further work .............................................................................. 35 References .................................................................................................................................... 35 FIGURES Figure 1 Existing BGS methane data and the areas available for the DECC 14th Licensing round. .......................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2 The location of thermogenic and biogenic methane in the sub-surface. ..................... 4 Figure 3 Target areas for the Survey a) in 2012 when the Survey started and b) after the work of Bloomfield et al (2014) and the 14th Licensing round. .......................................... 6 Figure 4 a) Collecting unstable parameters during sampling and b) gas collection cylinder and samples for inorganic and organic carbon analysis. ................................................... 8 Figure 5 Samples collected as part of the National Methane Baseline Survey. ........................ 9 Figure 6 Bedrock geology of the Lancashire & Cheshire region ........................................... 11 Figure 7 Methane data from the SSG and Superficial aquifers in the Lancashire & Cheshire Basins. ...................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 8 Methane data from the Lancashire & Cheshire region, dots are proportional to the CH4 concentration. ................................................................................................... 13 Figure 9 Location of Survey samples in the East Midlands Province. .................................... 14 ii OR/15/071 Figure 10 a) Methane data from the East Midlands Province, for the SSG, Chalk and Lincolnshire Limestone. b) Comparison of methane data between the confined
Recommended publications
  • BGS Report, Single Column Layout
    INDUSTRIAL CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS AND CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE POTENTIAL IN THE UK Report No. COAL R308 DTI/Pub URN 06/2027 October 2006 Contractor British Geological Survey Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)115 936 3100 By S. Holloway C.J. Vincent K.L. Kirk The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the DTI Carbon Abatement Technologies Programme. The DTI programme is managed by Future Energy Solutions. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the DTI or Future Energy Solutions First published 2006 © DTI 2006 Foreword This report is the product of a study by the British Geological Survey (BGS) undertaken for AEA Technology plc as part of agreement C/07/00384/00/00. It considers the UK emissions of carbon dioxide from large industrial point sources such as power stations and the potential geological storage capacity to safely and securely store these emissions. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the UK DTI for funding the work, and Dr Erik Lindeberg of Sintef Petroleum Research for provision of a programme to calculate the density of CO2. Contents Foreword.........................................................................................................................................i Acknowledgements.........................................................................................................................i Contents...........................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Freshwater Plesiosaurian from the Middle
    Gao et al. Journal of Palaeogeography (2019) 8:27 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-019-0043-5 Journal of Palaeogeography ORIGINALARTICLE Open Access The first record of freshwater plesiosaurian from the Middle Jurassic of Gansu, NW China, with its implications to the local palaeobiogeography Ting Gao, Da-Qing Li* , Long-Feng Li and Jing-Tao Yang Abstract Plesiosaurs are one of the common groups of aquatic reptiles in the Mesozoic, which mainly lived in marine environments. Freshwater plesiosaurs are rare in the world, especially from the Jurassic. The present paper reports the first freshwater plesiosaur, represented by four isolated teeth from the Middle Jurassic fluviolacustrine strata of Qingtujing area, Jinchang City, Gansu Province, Northwest China. These teeth are considered to come from one individual. The comparative analysis of the corresponding relationship between the body and tooth sizes of the known freshwater plesiosaur shows that Jinchang teeth represent a small-sized plesiosaurian. Based on the adaptive radiation of plesiosaurs and the palaeobiogeographical context, we propose a scenario of a river leading to the Meso-Tethys in the Late Middle Jurassic in Jinchang area, which may have provided a channel for the seasonal migration of plesiosaurs. Keywords: Freshwater plesiosaur, Middle Jurassic, Jinchang, Gansu Province, Palaeobiogeography 1 Introduction Warren 1980;Satoetal.2003; Kear 2012). Up to now, Plesiosaurs are one of the most familiar groups of Mesozoic the taxonomic affinities of most freshwater plesio- marine reptiles, which mainly lived in marine environ- saurs have remained unclear; some of them are re- ments. The records of plesiosaurs in non-marine deposits ferred to Plesiosauroidea (Cruickshank and Fordyce are sparse in comparison to those from marine sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. General Index
    Downloaded from http://pygs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 2. General Index abandoned river courses. Vale of York 40,223-32 anhydrite 50.78.79,81,86,88.143-54 Abbey Crags, Knaresborough Gorge 46,290 Anisocardiu tenera (Antiquicyprina) loweana 39, 117, 130, 131.738-9 Acadian 46,175 ff.; 50,255-65 anisotropy of vitrinites 39,515-26 acanthite 46,135 ankerite 50,87 Acanthodiacrodium cf. simplex 42,412-3 annelida, in Yorkshire Museum 41,402 Acanthodiacrodium rotundatum 45.124 antimony, trace element in galena 44,153 Acanthodiacrodium cf. tumidum 45,124 apatite 44,438 Acanthopleuroceras sp. 42, 152-3 apatite fission-track palaeotemperatures. north-west England 50,95-9 accretionary lapilli, Cwm Clwyd Tuff 39,201,206-7,209,215-6 Apatocythere (Apatocythere) simulans 45, 243 Acheulian handaxes 41,89,94-5 Apedale Fault 50. 196," 198 acid intrusions, Ordovician and Caledonian, geochemical characteristics aplites. Whin Sill 47,251 of 39,33-57 Apollo's Coppice, Shropshire 50,193 acritarchs. Arenig 42. 405 Arachinidiuin smithii 42, 213 acritarchs, Ordovician 47,271-4 Araucarites phillipsii 45,287 acritarchs,Tremadoc 38 45-55; 45,123-7 archaeology, Lincolnshire 41.75 ff. Actinocamax plenus 40,586 Arcomva unioniformis 39.117.133, 134, 138 Acton Reynald Hall, Shropshire 50,193,198,199,200,202,204 Arcow"45,19ff.' adamellite (Threlkeld Microgranite) 40,211-22 Arcow Wood Quarry 39,169,446,448,455,459,470-1 aegirine 44,356 arctic-alpine flora. Teesdale 40.206 aeolian deposition, Devensian loess 40,31 ff. Arenicolites 41,416,436-7 aeolian deposition. Permian 40,54.55 Arenobulirnina advena 45,240 aeolian sands, Permian 45, 11-18 Arenobulimina chapmani 45,240 aeolian sedimentation, Sherwood Sandstone Group 50,68-71 Arenobulirnina macfadyeni 45, 240 aeromagnetic modelling, west Cumbria 50,103-12 arfvedsonite 44,356 aeromagnetic survey, eastern England 46,313,335—41 argentopyrite 46, 134-5 aeromagnetic survey, Norfolk 46.313 Arniocreas fulcaries 42, 150-1 Africa, North, Devonian of 40,277-8 arsenic 44,431 ff.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Groundwater Vulnerability
    3D Groundwater Vulnerability Groundwater Programme Internal Report OR/18/12 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUNDWATER PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/18/12 3D Groundwater Vulnerability S Loveless, M A Lewis, J P Bloomfield, R Terrington, M E Stuart, R S Ward Contributor/editor The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Ian Davey, Alwyn Hart (Environment Agency) Copyright and database rights 20178. Ordnance Survey Licence No. 100021290 EUL. Keywords Report; keywords. Bibliographical reference LOVELESS, S, LEWIS, M A, BLOOMFIELD, J P, TERRINGTON, R, STUART, M E AND WARD, R S. 20178. 3D Groundwater Vulnerability. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/18/12. 201pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © UKRI 2018. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2018 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stones of Lincolnshire
    Building stones of Greater Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Limestone at another famous Lincoln landmark © Lincolnshire County Council The rocks on which we stand The geology of Greater Lincolnshire (encompassing the county of Lincolnshire and the unitary authorities of North and North East Lincolnshire) comprises rocks and sediments of Late Triassic (the oldest rocks) in the west to Quaternary (the most recent sediments) in the east. In general, the rocks dip gently eastwards towards the North Sea coast forming a tilted sandwich. The area can be divided into several topographically and geologically distinct regions: in the west are the Trent Valley and the Isle of Axholme which are underlain by the Triassic rocks. To the east are two north- south ridges of higher ground forming the Lincoln Edge or Cliff (of Jurassic limestone) and the Lincolnshire Wolds (of Cretaceous chalk). The remainder of the area forms part of the low-lying drainage basin of the Humber Estuary (or Humber Levels) in the north while the southern limit of the Wolds is obscured by a thickening cover of sediments that forms the area of south Lincolnshire known as the fenland. Both the Humber Levels and the fenland have a series of Quaternary sediments. The geology of Greater Lincolnshire Clay tiles still produced here Bricks once manufactured here BARTON UPON HUMBER Ironstone village and churches common in Occasional chalk farm this area buildings in the Wolds SCUNTHORPE GRIMSBY Bricks once manufactured in this area EPWORTH Tealby limestone village and church MARKET RASEN LOUTH
    [Show full text]
  • Reprinted from PROC,EEDINGS of the GEOLOGICAL Socil$PY of LONDON P' April 1962 the AMXONITES of the SPILSBY Smdstone, and the JU
    Reprinted from PROC,EEDINGS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIl$PY OF LONDON p' April 1962 SHORT COMMUNICATION THE AMXONITES OF THE SPILSBY SmDSTONE, AND THE JURASSIC-CRETACEOUS BOUNDARY BY RAYMOND CASEY,PH.D. r.a.s. In Lincolnshire the Kimmeridge Clay is succeeded unwnformably by the Spilsby Sandstone, which has long been accepted as marking the base of the British marine Cretaceous. Recent kds in the Sandringham Sands of Norfolk (Casey 19618) led to a routine examination of the Spilsby ammonite succession. The results were unexpected and alter the whole concept of ammonite chronology, correlation, and palaeogeography at the Jumssic-Cretaceous boundary in the Bored province. In terms of the Russian sequence the Spilsby Sandstone must now be regarded as span- ning the top of the Lower Volgian, Upper Volgian, and Riasan Beds. Its correlatives in Southern England extend from the upper part of the Portland Beds to the basal part of the Hastings Sands. The Jurassio- Cretaceous boundary thus runs through the middle of the formation. The idea that separately evolving ammonite oommunities were isolated by shrinkage of the oceans at the end of the Jurassic and the beginning of the Cretaceous (cf. Salfeld 1921),already rejected in the case of Hectorocerm to a group found in the Lower Cretaceous of Russia. He proposed the (Casey 1961~,p. 168), must be reconsidered in its application to the name Subcrmpedites for this group of ammonites and introduced the term Volgian. We can no longer assume that the Jurassic seas with their ' Subcraspeditan Age ' for the upper half of the Infra-Val~nginian[Berria- ammonites retreated from north-west Europe with the end of the Port- sian] Stage of the Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stratigraphical Framework for the Lower Cretaceous of England
    A stratigraphical framework for the Lower Cretaceous of England Research Report RR/08/03 HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS DOCUMENT Bookmarks The main elements of the table of contents are book- marked enabling direct links to be followed to the principal section headings and sub- headings, figures, plates and tables irrespective of which part of the document the user is viewing. In addition, the report contains links: from the principal section and subsection headings back to the contents page, from each reference to a figure, plate or table directly to the corresponding figure, plate or table, from each figure, plate or table caption to the first place that figure, plate or table is mentioned in the text and from each page number back to the contents page. RETURN TO CONTENTS PAGE BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT RR/08/03 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/2008. Keywords A stratigraphical framework for the United Kingdom, England, Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, East Anglia, Southern England. Lower Cretaceous of England Geology, Stratigraphy, Lower Cretaceous, Early Cretaceous. P M Hopson, I P Wilkinson and M A Woods Front cover Ferruginous Sand Formation exposed above a significant landslide founded in the Atherfield Clay Formation, Red Cliff, Sandown Bay, Isle of Wight (P683788). Bibliographical reference HOPSON , P M, WILKINSON , I P, and WOODS , M A. 2008. A stratigraphical framework for the Lower Cretaceous of England. British Geological Survey. British Geological Survey Research Report, RR/08/03. ISBN 0 85272 623 5 Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work.
    [Show full text]
  • 43: Lincolnshire Wolds Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 43: Lincolnshire Wolds Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 43: Lincolnshire Wolds Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper1, Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention3, we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform theirdecision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The informationthey contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future. 1 The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature, Defra NCA profiles are working documents which draw on current evidence and (2011; URL: www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm80/8082/8082.pdf) 2 knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire Wolds Field Trip 31St August - 2Nd September 2007
    Lincolnshire Wolds Field Trip 31st August - 2nd September 2007 This was a weekend field trip to the Lincolnshire Wolds, with Walton Hall Branch, led by Dr Paul Olver. Report by Patricia Taylor We arrived at the Lincoln Hotel, opposite Lincoln Cathedral, and had a splendid meal. Afterwards, our leader Paul Olver gave us an overview of the geology of the area that we would be looking at. On Saturday, we would travel directly north from Lincoln, along the strike of the Lower Oolite, to look at the the Middle Jurassic exposures in Manton Quarry, then northeast to the chalk scarp at Melton Ross. Saturday afternoon would be spent looking at the red chalk, Cretaceous and Upper Jurassic ironstones and sandstones that underlie the Wolds. On Sunday we would travel south to look again at the Middle Jurassic rocks at Ancaster and Metheringham. Saturday – Location 1, Manton Quarry (ST 942 010) On Saturday morning we set out in convoy to the Manton Quarry, a cement quarry north of Kirton Lindsey. The middle Jurassic strata exposed in the quarry were Kirton cementstones, Kirton shale of the lower Lincolnshire limestone and the Hibaldstow beds of hard limestone, topped by soft but oolitic limestone. These are all shallow water limestones, deposited in the Bajocian stage of the Middle Jurassic. See Figure 1. Figure 1 Bajocian Lincs Limestone at Manton Quarry The floor of the quarry was on the Lower Estuarine Series, which are a thin sequence of sands and clays deposited in low lying, deltaic and coastal flats. The coastal flats were submerged in later Bajocian times, which allowed deposition of the lower Lincolnshire Limestone Series that we could see in the quarry walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Ig UIDE to GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY MAPPING in ENGLAND and WALES National Rivers Authority
    NRA Water Resources 28 Ig UIDE TO GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY MAPPING IN ENGLAND AND WALES National Rivers Authority GUIDE TO GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY MAPPING IN ENGLAND AND WALES R C Palmer, I P Holman (Soil Survey and Land Research Centre, Cranfield University) N S Robins, M A Lewis (British Geological Survey) The Information Centre National Rivers Authority Waterside Drive © National Rivers Authority, 1995. Applications for reproduction should be to HMSO Copyright Unit, St Crispins, Norwich NR3 1PD First edition 1995 ISBN 0 11 310103 1 ISSN 1358-328X This Guide was produced for the NRA by the Soil Survey and Land Research Centre (SSLRC) and The British Geological Survey (BGS) under a contract constituting part of the NRA’s Research and Development programme. Designed by HMSO Graphic Design Cover and text printed on recycled materials (HMSO Recycled Register — Score 60.0) FOREWORD In 1992 the National Rivers Authority published its Policy and Practice for the Protection of Groundwater. The implementation of the policy depends upon the definition of groundwater source protection zones and on the preparation of vulnerability maps. This guide is one of two volumes which provide the background to the production and use of these two policy tools and complement the original policy document. The companion volume to this Guide is the Guide to Groundwater Protection Zones in England and Wales. GUIDE TO GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY MAPPING IH ENGLAND AND WALES CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Aims of the guide 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Groundwater vulnerability
    [Show full text]
  • Mercian Volume 16 Index
    Mercian Geologist Volume 17 Contents Part 1, 2008, pages 1 - 68 Part 2, 2009, pages 69 – 140 plus supplement Part 3, 2010, pages 140 – 220 plus supplement Part 4, 2011, pages 221 – 292 Academic papers Peter Worsley 11 Pleistocene and Flandrian natural rock salt subsidence at Arclid Green, Sandbach, Cheshire John Jones 19 The Big Hole of Starkholmes Michael J Czajkowski 23 Formation of St. John’s Hill, Gruczno, Poland Ian Thomas an Mike Cooper 27 The geology of Chatsworth House, Derbyshire John Carney, John Aram and Tony Waltham 43 Two notable earthquakes in 2008 Jonathon D Radley 75 The geological evolution of Warwickshire Michael J Czajkowski 86 Amber from the Baltic Trevor Ford and Bernard O’Connor 93 A vanished industry: coprolite mining Christopher J. Duffin 101 Records of warfare…embalmed in everlasting hills: a history of early coprolite research Peter Worsley 112 The physical geology of beavers David G. Bate 149 Sir Henry Thomas de la Beche and the founding of the British Geological Survey John Carney 166 Magma mixing in the South Leicestershire Diorite: evidence from an Ordivician pluton at Croft Quarry Tim Colman 173 Gold in Britain: past, present and future Stephen Gurney, Timothy Astin, Geoffrey Griffiths 181 Origin and structure of Devensian depressions at Letton, Herefordshire Albert Horton 185 Building stones of St. Mary’s Church at Colston Bassett , Nottinghamshire Helen Boynton and Trevor Ford 195 William W. Watts, pioneer Midland Geologist John Hunter and Richard Shaw 229 The Cressbrook Dale Lava and Litton Tuff, between Longstone and Hucklow Edges, Derbyshire Martin Cross 243 Slope geomorphology and threshold slopes at Callow Bank, Hathersage, Derbyshire Hugh S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Sourcing Stone for the Conservation and Repair of the Buildings
    Sourcing stone for the conservation and repair of the buildings and monuments of Britain Graham Lott Abstract Stone for the construction of buildings and monuments has been locally quarried from most parts of Britain’s lithologically diverse geological succession for the last 3500 yrs. Each part of the geological column, from the Precambrian to Quaternary, has yielded stone for building providing a colourful palette of stones for Britain’s stone architecture and monuments. For those involved in conserving these structures this diversity of stone types has itself become an increasing problem as many of the original quarries have long since stopped working and the stones disappeared from the marketplace. This lack of an adequate range of indigenous stones suitable for conservation repair and for sympathetic new build projects is an ongoing concern for heritage organisations, property owners and developers in Britain. There are a number of ways in which this problem is being addressed. It is clearly important to demonstrate the scale of the problem by collating sufficient information to identify those stones (and therefore those stone structures) most under threat. While some vernacular stones were used widely others often only appear in a small number of buildings. A national database of all indigenous stone sources used and an assessment of their extent of use is therefore essential. Subsequent analysis of the data gathered will then allow the identification of those stones which are of critical concern and which might then generate sufficient interest and economic potential for quarry operators to consider re‐opening sites for new stone production. This review is an attempt to give an overview of the former extent of the building stone resources of Britain to illustrate the extent of the current problems of stone supply.
    [Show full text]