Performance Engineering 2020 a Sogeti and Neotys Report the State of Performance Engineering 2020 — Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Performance Engineering 2020 a Sogeti and Neotys Report the State of Performance Engineering 2020 — Contents The State of Performance Engineering 2020 A Sogeti and Neotys report The state of performance engineering 2020 — contents Introduction to performance engineering 3 Chapter 1: Culture 6 Enterprise spotlight: IMA 15 Chapter 2: Organisation 18 Chapter 3: Practices 27 Enterprise spotlight: MAIF 42 Chapter 4: Building in performance engineering 44 Chapter 5: Outlook 57 Closing thoughts: the practitioners’ corner 68 Acknowledgements, About the study, Respondents, Footnotes and references, About Neotys, About Sogeti 74 2 THE STATE OF PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING 2020 PRESENTED BY SOGETI AND NEOTYS Introduction In the first half of 2020, application performance became Welcome to the 2020 State of Performance highly visible and imperative. At the time of writing this Engineering report report, video conferencing, teleconsultation, online shopping, and many online transactions were all in the The discipline of performance engineering is often midst of extraordinary surges of use. Companies guided reserved for specialists. There is little data available by a strong proactive vision in digital business have to enterprises to help them understand the current managed to navigate successfully in these uncertain practices and how other organisations are managing it. external circumstances. For instance, UK home furnishing This research fills the void by combining the opinions retailer Dunelm reported a 100%+ increase in sales of 515 senior decision makers and the perspective during the lockdown weeks of Spring 2020. of subject matter experts from Sogeti, Neotys and Organisations are changing the way they operate — outside practitioners to explore the landscape of with a surge in remote work — and they increasingly performance engineering. This report reveals the place serve their customers through digital engagement. of application performance in an organisation’s business, More resilient and faster digital services are a major the organisational structure around it, and the various success factor for enterprises in the new normal. This is activities and trends shaping the practice. Derived even more prevalent for some companies with digital from our collective pool of experience from helping platforms acting as the only channel of customer companies in a wide variety of industries, we aim to interaction. Almost all applications are likely to be deeply provide pragmatic recommendations for organisations embedded within organisation core systems and as willing to improve and enhance the business value their such, they profoundly impact the overall ecosystem — performance engineering delivers. positively or negatively. What matters is the ability of an This report is designed to benefit all stakeholders within organisation to anticipate, learn and innovate to protect an organisation that deal with application performance their brand, reputation and revenue. including: executives, business and product owners, architects, developers, quality assurance engineers, tool coordinators, infrastructure engineers, and system administrators. 3 THE STATE OF PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING 2020 PRESENTED BY SOGETI AND NEOTYS What is performance engineering all about? and disrupter of change. It involves multidisciplinary professionals with complementary backgrounds and Performance engineering is a collaborative discipline skills working together to achieve a common mission. focused on achieving high levels of application Application performance is the overarching principle for performance to benefit the business. Performance which we bear equal responsibility and accountability. engineering contributes to making IT an enabler usiness esigning eeoping Testing onitoring for for for for Performance Performance Performance Performance eedac uture Figure 1: Performance Engineering 4 THE STATE OF PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING 2020 PRESENTED BY SOGETI AND NEOTYS As such, performance engineering is much more than just Chapter 1 is for executive leadership responsible for running test scripts and analysing production metrics. If setting the direction and culture of the company. They performance testing entails certain processes and steps need compelling reasons to drive transformative change. to determine faults, performance engineering assesses We examine how application performance is valued and the entire system to identify where and how different what is its impact is on the business. pieces can be optimised and: Chapter 2 lifts the veil on some of the key organisational • Ensures business continuity under changing components in building a performance-first culture. usage patterns Chapter 3 covers some of the building blocks and • Introduces new services faster and improves the fundamental capabilities of performance engineering. quality of experience for end users Through a variety of use cases, we review why they play a • Controls costs and more specifically, significant role in achieving the mission. infrastructure expenditure. Chapter 4 dives deeper into the underlying technical foundation and necessary integration as we start to incorporate performance engineering in the lifecycle. Chapter 5 investigates the likely evolution of performance engineering. We wish you an excellent read. 5 “Corporate culture is important because it shapes the work environment in which performance occurs. Ultimately, not paying attention to culture undermines an organisation’s profitability and sustainability” ― Torben Rick1 6 THE STATE OF PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING 2020 PRESENTED BY SOGETI AND NEOTYS on the performance of their applications, few are willing Chapter 1: to invest in improving and supporting it. Staggeringly, Culture of performance engineering only 21% of respondents claim application performance is an integral part of the brand equity. The disconnection As leading business change guru Torben Rick observes, may stem from operational issues — for example time the corporate culture shapes many aspects of a business pressures and budget constraints, and strategic issues including the way application performance is regarded, — namely the lack of C-level understanding that causes managed and implemented. It can also affect how people repercussion beyond the financial impact. The real cost of approach performance engineering and the effectiveness poor performance is a combination of money, time and of the work they do. At the same time, performance reputational damage. engineering can affect the success of the business and the culture and strategy in terms of the way both the The importance of good performance engineering has people and the business work. been known for many years. This is evident in examples like the 2006 interview with an ex-Amazon employee who In this chapter, we examine how application performance explained that during various tests Amazon discovered is valued and how this translates at the various levels of even small sub-second delays in the website would result the organisational levels. In turn, we review the business in substantial and costly drops in revenue. More recently, impact of your culture of performance and provide in 2018 Google research claimed that “as page load time recommendations on how to perfect your approach to goes from one second to 10 seconds, the probability of performance engineering. a mobile site visitor bouncing increases by 123%”. End Where does application performance fit in users have limited empathy for the effort in making a business priorities? service perform. They just want things to work. A company publicly announcing a software glitch can In 2020, the key expectation is fast, reliable and lose much more than shareholder value. In 2018, the BBC trustworthy software. reported that 10% of users would leave a website for In 2020, faith in application performance means faith in every additional second a page takes to load. We should the business as a whole. all be aware that poor application performance hinders employee productivity, degrades customer experience, Application performance is key, yet reduces process efficiency, diverts resources and impedes addressed tactically rather than strategically many aspects of overall business performance. Most organisations restrict the measurement of With so many recent failures of software putting business application performance to traditional load and stress and careers in jeopardy, the results of this survey are testing. One way to remove the restriction is to connect deceiving. They indicate that while many companies rely business outcomes to the performance of the computer 7 THE STATE OF PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING 2020 PRESENTED BY SOGETI AND NEOTYS systems. Inherently, business stakeholders need to who represent performance engineering are likely to actively collaborate to identify the key business metrics in improve it most by ensuring both the business and the enough detail to be measurable, practical and useful. CTO understand how performance engineering can help them achieve their objectives, and how they can A challenge for technical staff in these organisations is help to maximise the effectiveness of the performance in getting the attention of the business stakeholders. engineering to make this happen. Often, a more practical approach is for the business to lead the initial discussion and the Chief Technical 25% of the respondents connect system performance Officer (CTO) to drive subsequent discussions and the directly to their business outcomes. This connection necessary changes throughout the organisation. This provides a common bond and helps companies gives them the authority,
Recommended publications
  • Hardware & Software Standards
    Hardware & Software Standards Introduction This document identifies the current City of Chicago standards for its hardware and software environments, and is intended primarily for City department and vendor use. These standards do not mean that other software and hardware, which might have been previously listed as standard, may not be used or supported, but the following items should be purchased for any new initiative or growth/replacement needs. Any proposals for non-standard hardware or software purchases or questions/comments should be forwarded to the Department of Innovation and Technology (DoIT) Enterprise Architecture Board for review, and will need to be approved via the Technology Purchase Review and Approval (TPRA) process. Standards denoted with an asterisk (*) are currently under review. Platform Standards Operating System (O/S) Hardware Platform Solaris 10 (Unix) (Oracle) Sun Microsystems RedHat Linux Enterprise Server 6.x, 7.x Dell RedHat Linux Enterprise Server 7.x (PCI Services) Dell VMWare VSphere 6.5U1 Dell Windows 2012 R2 & 2016 (Standard and Enterprise) Dell Windows 7, Windows 10 Dell, Panasonic Page 1 of 6 Last Revised January 2018 Hardware & Software Standards Enterprise Services Type Windows 2008 Server All other platforms Oracle Enterprise 11gR2, 12cR1; Postgres 9.x or 10.x (EnterpriseDB or Database N/A community) Print O/S n/a File O/S n/a Email Exchange 2016 / Office365 n/a Desktops, Laptops, & Tablets Type Model Standard Users Dell OptiPlex 5050 SFF, Dell OptiPlex 7450 All-In-One Mobile User Latitude 12 Rugged Extreme Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 Latitude 12 2 in 1 with case and Doc Latitude 5480 14" Laptop 6th gen proc High-End Workstation Dell Precision T5810 Laptop Accessories Docking- For the E-5470 units, Dell Business Dock - WD15 with 130W Adapter Monitor Dell 23 Monitor – P2317H Page 2 of 6 Last Revised January 2018 Hardware & Software Standards Printing and Scanning The Department of Fleet and Facility Management (2FM) oversees print services for the City of Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • IT CLASSIFICATION TECHNOLOGY LIST – ISSUE DATE: April 18, 2017
    IT CLASSIFICATION TECHNOLOGY LIST – ISSUE DATE: April 18, 2017 Technology Definition: A set of knowledge, skills and/or abilities, taking a significant time (e.g. 6 months) to learn, and applicable to the defined classification specification assigned. Example of Tools: These are examples only for illustration purposes and are not meant to constitute a full and/or comprehensive list. CLASSIFICATION DISCIPLINE TECHNOLOGY DEFINITION EXAMPLE OF TOOLS Omegamon, IBM Admin Tools, Log Analyzer, Relational The relational database management system provided by IBM that runs on Unix, Linux, DBA DB2 DB2 Compare, Nsynch, TSM, Universal Database Windows and z/OS platforms including DB2 Connect and related tools. Command, SQL SQL Server Mgmt. Studio, Red Gate, Vantage, SQL Server The relational database management system and related tools provided by Microsoft Corp. Tivoli, Snap Manager, Toad, Enterprise Manager, SQL ORACLE The relational database management system and related tools provided by Oracle Corp. ASE SYBASE The relational database management system and related tools provided by Sybase. Cincom SUPRA SQL – Cincom’s relational database management system provides access to data Supra 2.X in open and proprietary environments through industry-standard SQL for standalone and client/server application solutions. Open Source Open Source database management system such as Mysql. Phpadmin, mysqladmin, Vertica Hierarchical The hierarchical database management system provided by IBM that runs on z/OS mainframe IMS BMC IMS Utilities, Strobe, Omegamon Database platform including related tools. Cincom SUPRA® PDM – Cincom’s networked, hierarchical database management system provides access to your data through a Physical Data Manager (PDM) that manages the data Supra 1 structures of the physical files that store the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Development with Flex
    Enterprise Development with Flex Enterprise Development with Flex Yakov Fain, Victor Rasputnis, and Anatole Tartakovsky Beijing • Cambridge • Farnham • Köln • Sebastopol • Taipei • Tokyo Enterprise Development with Flex by Yakov Fain, Victor Rasputnis, and Anatole Tartakovsky Copyright © 2010 Yakov Fain, Victor Rasputnis, and Anatole Tartakovsky.. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Published by O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472. O’Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. Online editions are also available for most titles (http://my.safaribooksonline.com). For more information, contact our corporate/institutional sales department: (800) 998-9938 or [email protected]. Editor: Mary E. Treseler Indexer: Ellen Troutman Development Editor: Linda Laflamme Cover Designer: Karen Montgomery Production Editor: Adam Zaremba Interior Designer: David Futato Copyeditor: Nancy Kotary Illustrator: Robert Romano Proofreader: Sada Preisch Printing History: March 2010: First Edition. Nutshell Handbook, the Nutshell Handbook logo, and the O’Reilly logo are registered trademarks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. Enterprise Development with Flex, the image of red-crested wood-quails, and related trade dress are trademarks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and O’Reilly Media, Inc. was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in caps or initial caps. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher and authors assume no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information con- tained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Web-Engineering" Kapitel 9: Website-Analyse Und -Optimierung
    Reader zum MOOC "Web-Engineering" Kapitel 9: Website-Analyse und -Optimierung Die PDF-Datei wurde mit Hilfe des Open-Source-Werkzeugs „mwlib“ erstellt. Für weitere Informationen siehe http://code.pediapress.com/ PDF generated at: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:53:28 UTC Inhalt Artikel Web-Controlling 1 Web Analytics 1 Google Analytics 7 Piwik 10 AWStats 12 Webalizer 14 Logdateianalyse 16 Ganglinie 20 Konversion (Marketing) 22 Conversion-Tracking 24 Click-Through-Rate 25 Besucherzähler 26 Unique Visit 27 Referrer 28 Seitenabruf 30 Zählpixel 32 Cron 34 Do Not Track 38 Web-Monitoring 41 Munin (Software) 41 WPO: Web Performance Optimization 44 Google Page Speed 44 SPDY 45 Performnace-Test 47 Lasttest (Computer) 47 Stresstest 50 Apache JMeter 52 Dienstgütevereinbarung für Websites 53 Service-Level-Agreement 53 Webhosting 55 SMART (Projektmanagement) 58 Downtime 59 Verfügbarkeit 60 Paketumlaufzeit 62 Quellennachweise Quelle(n) und Bearbeiter des/der Artikel(s) 64 Quelle(n), Lizenz(en) und Autor(en) des Bildes 66 Artikellizenzen Lizenz 67 1 Web-Controlling Web Analytics Web Analytics (auch Web-Controlling, Web-Analyse, Datenverkehrsanalyse, Traffic-Analyse, Clickstream-Analyse, Webtracking) ist die Sammlung und Auswertung des Verhaltens von Besuchern auf Websites. Ein Analytic-Tool untersucht typischerweise, woher die Besucher kommen, welche Bereiche auf einer Internetseite aufgesucht werden und wie oft und wie lange welche Unterseiten und Kategorien angesehen werden. In Deutschland ist der Einsatz solcher Werkzeuge aus Datenschutzgründen umstritten. Sie wird vor allem zur Optimierung der Website und zur besseren Erreichung von Zielen der Website (z. B. Häufigkeit von Besuchen, Vermehrung von Seitenaufrufen, Bestellungen, Newsletter-Abonnements) eingesetzt. Grundlegend kann bei Web Analytics zwischen Auswertungsverfahren zur permanenten Messung der Site-Effektivität und Methoden zur Auffindung von Schwachpunkten in der Site und Verbesserungsmöglichkeiten unterschieden werden (siehe Methoden).
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering of IT Management Automation Along Task Analysis, Loops, Function Allocation, Machine Capabilities
    Engineering of IT Management Automation along Task Analysis, Loops, Function Allocation, Machine Capabilities Dissertation an der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munchen¨ vorgelegt von Ralf Konig¨ Tag der Einreichung: 12. April 2010 Engineering of IT Management Automation along Task Analysis, Loops, Function Allocation, Machine Capabilities Dissertation an der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munchen¨ vorgelegt von Ralf Konig¨ Tag der Einreichung: 12. April 2010 Tag des Rigorosums: 26. April 2010 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Heinz-Gerd Hegering, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munchen¨ 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Bernhard Neumair, Georg-August-Universitat¨ Gottingen¨ Abstract This thesis deals with the problem, that IT management automation projects are all tackled in a different manner with a different general approach and different resulting system architecture. It is a relevant problem for at least two reasons: 1) more and more IT resources with built-in or asso- ciated IT management automation systems are built today. It is inefficient to try to solve each on their own. And 2) doing so, reuse of knowledge between IT management automation systems, as well as reuse of knowledge from other domains is severely limited. While this worked with simple stand-alone remote monitoring and remote control facilities, automation of cognitive tasks will more and more profit from existing knowledge in domains such as artificial intelligence, statistics, control theory, and automated planning. A common structure also would ease integration and coupling of such systems, delegating cognitive partial tasks, and switching between commonly defined levels of automation. So far, this problem is only partly solved.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Software Performance Engineering for Enterprise Applications
    Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences | 2017 Collaborative Software Performance Engineering for Enterprise Applications Hendrik Müller, Sascha Bosse, Markus Wirth, Klaus Turowski Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany {hendrik.mueller, sascha.bosse, markus.wirth, klaus.turowski}@ovgu.de Abstract address these challenges from a software engineering perspective under the term DevOps [2], [3]. In the domain of enterprise applications, Corresponding research activities aim at increased organizations usually implement third-party standard flexibility through shorter release cycles in order to software components in order to save costs. Hence, support frequently changing business processes. application performance monitoring activities Therefore, DevOps enables a culture, practices and constantly produce log entries that are comparable to automation that support fast, efficient and reliable a certain extent, holding the potential for valuable software delivery [4]. However, especially for collaboration across organizational borders. Taking enterprise applications, IT departments usually make advantage of this fact, we propose a collaborative use of existing standard software components instead knowledge base, aimed to support decisions of of developing solutions entirely in-house [5]. In such performance engineering activities, carried out cases, activities referred to as Dev, rather include during early design phases of planned enterprise requirements engineering, architectural design, applications. To verify our assumption of cross- customization, testing, performance-tuning and organizational comparability, machine learning deployment [6]. Here, key service levels typically algorithms were trained on monitoring logs of 18,927 include performance objectives, expressed in terms of standard application instances productively running average response times, throughput or latency, in at different organizations around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • The 20 Best 2018 Performance Tester Insights
    Whitepaper The 20 Best 2018 Performance Tester insights THE 20 BEST 2018 PERFORMANCE TESTER INSIGHTS 2nd edition 20 speakers from 10 countries 24 hours live 35 cup of coffee 800 registrants 950 stickers Whitepaper The 20 Best 2018 Performance Tester insights This past June, Neotys brought together 20 experts from around the world to share their experience and knowledge regarding techniques, challenges, and best practices associated with load testing for the modern enterprise. The gathering was delivered online as a virtual event. The second annual Performance Advisory Council (PAC) event, proved to be transformational. Attendees were treated to new and innovative practices on the art and science of performance testing. Each presentation provided a wealth of information with insights and techniques aimed at performance testing improvement. The following is a synopsis of several presentations made during the event. We’re happy to share this information in the spirit of creating a more well informed, efficient community of test practitioners. Enabling user story sharing and learning on an international basis is critical to us. Stijn Schepers Performance Testing is Not an Average Game! Stijn Schepers has over 18 years of international experience as a performance test specialist/manager using both Agile (Scrum, SAFe) and Waterfall models. He has worked in Europe, New Zealand, and Australia as a performance engineer testing and optimizing complex enterprise solutions like Oracle: Financials, Forms, Web Center, CRM Applications, JD Edwards, J2EE solutions, Vignette, SIEBEL, SAP, Cúram, IBM Websphere, and Mule. Schepers is a visionary leader with in-depth technical knowledge in concept and practice driving performance testing in the modern enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Verification and Validation of UML and SysML Based Systems Engineering Design Models YOSR JARRAYA A THESIS IN The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada April 2010 Yosr Jarraya, 2010 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Yourfìle Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-67341-6 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-67341-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Analysis of Business Process Models with Advanced Constructs David Piessens Eindhoven University of Technology, [email protected]
    Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) ACIS 2010 Proceedings Australasian (ACIS) 2010 Performance Analysis of Business Process Models with Advanced Constructs David Piessens Eindhoven University of Technology, [email protected] Queensland University of Technology Moe Thandar Wynn Queensland University of Technology, [email protected] Michael Adams Queensland University of Technology, [email protected] Boudewijn F. van Dongen Eindhoven University of Technology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2010 Recommended Citation Piessens, David; Queensland University of Technology; Wynn, Moe Thandar; Adams, Michael; and van Dongen, Boudewijn F., "Performance Analysis of Business Process Models with Advanced Constructs" (2010). ACIS 2010 Proceedings. 23. http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2010/23 This material is brought to you by the Australasian (ACIS) at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). It has been accepted for inclusion in ACIS 2010 Proceedings by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). For more information, please contact [email protected]. 21 st Australasian Conference on Information Systems Performance Analysis of Business Process Models 1-3 Dec 2010, Brisbane Piessens et al. Performance Analysis of Business Process Models with Advanced Constructs David Piessens Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Email: [email protected] Moe Thandar Wynn Michael Adams Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Boudewijn F. van Dongen Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Email: [email protected] Abstract The importance of actively managing and analysing business processes is acknowledged more than ever in or- ganisations nowadays.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Skills & Certifications
    GLOBAL TECH. LOCAL TRUST. Directory TECHNICAL SKILLS & CERTIFICATIONS SMC Squared | Dallas • Minneapolis • Bangalore Let’s bring your ideas to life. Call to schedule your complimentary SAM today. +1 833-762-2552 | [email protected] | smc2.com TECHNICAL SKILLS & EXPERIENCE A Azure Function apps D H Accounting and Administrative Azure Functions Data Analytics and Reporting Hadoop Actitime/Project Insight - Time Tracking Tools Azure Gen2 Data Architecture Hbase Active Directory Azure HD Insights Data Bricks HDFS ActiveVOS Azure IoT Hub Data Governance HDFS and KAFKA AD DS Azure Key Vault Data Integeration HD Insight ADF Azure Logic Apps Data Lake Delivery HDP/CDH/MAPR Administrator Azure Machine Learning Data Modeling Hibernate ADO.NET Azure MicroServices Data Processing Hive Adobe Analytics Azure ML Studio Data Science Hortonworks Adobe Experience Manager Azure PAAS Data Science Delivery HP LoadRunner Adobe Experience Manager 6 Azure Pipelines Data Visualization HR Adobe Photoshop Azure Portal Data Warehousing HRIS Aerospike Azure Services Database (Oracle & Sybase) HTML/HTML5 Agile Azure Spark Databricks Database Design HTML/CSS Agile Testing Azure SQL DataBase Database Testing Hue Agile/ Scrum Methodologies Azure Stream Analytics DataProc Hybrid app development using Apache Airflow Azure Testing DB Testing Cordova with HTML5, CSS and jQuery AJAX B DB Visualizer Hybris Platform Akamai and Tata CDN B2B Commerce Cloud DB2 I Akka Http Backend Testing DBA MYSQL IBM IHS Alteryx Bash Scripting DBVisualizer/ PHPMyAdmin - DB Tools IDD Analysis Bash
    [Show full text]
  • The Backbone of the Performance Engineering Process Software
    Performance Requirements: the Backbone of the Performance Engineering Process Alexander Podelko Oracle Performance requirements should to be tracked from system's inception through its whole lifecycle including design, development, testing, operations, and maintenance. They are the backbone of the performance engineering process. However different groups of people are involved in each stage and they use their own vision, terminology, metrics, and tools that makes the subject confusing when you go into details. The paper discusses existing issues and approaches in their relationship with the performance engineering process. What is the Problem? At first glance, the subject of performance requirements looks simple enough. Almost every book about performance has a few pages about performance requirements. Quite often a performance requirements section can be found in project documentation. However, the more you examine the area of performance requirements, the more questions and issues arise. The performance engineering process is a set of performance-related activities associated with every stage of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). It may even be represented as a separate Performance Engineering Life Cycle going in parallel with the basic SDLC as on the fig.1 below [Performance12]: Software Development Performance Engineering Life Cycle Life Cycle Requirements Gathering and Analysis Performance Requirements Gathering and Analysis Architecture and Design Design for Performance and Performance Modeling Construction / Implementation Unit Performance Tests and Code Optimization Testing Performance Testing Deployment and Maintenance Performance Monitoring and Capacity Management Fig.1. Performance Engineering Life Cycle. 1 Performance requirements should be tracked from the system inception through the whole system l ifecycle including design, development, testing, operations, and maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Performance Patterns for Requirements Analysis
    Applying Performance Patterns for Requirements Analysis Azadeh Alebrahim, paluno – The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology, Germany Maritta Heisel, paluno – The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology, Germany Performance as one of the critical quality requirements for the success of a software system must be integrated into software development from the beginning to prevent performance problems. Analyzing and modeling performance demands knowledge of performance experts and analysts. In order to integrate performance analysis into software analysis and design methods, performance-specific properties known as domain knowledge have to be identified, analyzed, and documented properly. In this paper, we propose the performance analysis method PoPeRA to guide the requirements engineer in dealing with performance problems as early as possible in requirements analysis. Our struc- tured method provides support for identifying potential performance problems using performance-specific domain knowledge attached to the requirement models. To deal with identified performance problems, we make use of performance analysis patterns to be applied to the requirement models in the requirements engineering phase. To show the application of our approach, we illustrate it with the case study CoCoME, a trading system to be deployed in supermarkets for handling sales. Categories and Subject Descriptors: I.5.2 [Pattern Recognition]: Design Methodology—pattern analysis; D.2.1 [Software Engineering]: Requirements/Specifications—Methodologies; D.2.9 [Software Engineering]: Management—Software quality assurance (SQA); D.2.11 [Software Engineering]: Software Architectures—Patterns General Terms: Design, Performance Additional Key Words and Phrases: Performance patterns, problem frames, requirements engineering, software architecture, UML ACM Reference Format: Alebrahim, A. and Heisel, M. 2015. Applying Performance Patterns for Requirements Analysis jn 2, 3, Article 1 (May 2010), 15 pages.
    [Show full text]