OCEANIC AREA SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT STUDY (OASIS] Volume II: North Atlantic Region Air Traffic Services System Description

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OCEANIC AREA SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT STUDY (OASIS] Volume II: North Atlantic Region Air Traffic Services System Description Report No. FAA-EM-81-17,11 OCEANIC AREA SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT STUDY (OASIS] Volume II: North Atlantic Region Air Traffic Services System Description G. J. Couluris EC: SRI International ­ Menlo Park, California 94025 SEPTEMBER 1981 FINAL REPORT Document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT WASHINGTON. D.C. 20591 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page FAA-EM-81-17 ,II 4. T,tfe and Subtitle S. Repotl Date OCEANIC AREA SYSTE~1 IMPROVE~IENT STUDY (OASIS) VOLUME II September 1981 NORTH ATLANTIC REGION AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES 6. Pe,fotlfting O•goni zalion Code SYSTEM DESCRIPTION SRI Project 8066 t-;;-:-:-;--:-;-----------------------------4 8. Performing Otganizotion Repo•t No. 7. Author' a) OASIS-NAT-ATS G.J. Couluris 9. Perform•ng Organilolion Nome and Addreaa 10. Work Unit No. CTRAIS) SRI International II. Contract or Grant No. 333 Ravenswood Ave DOT-FA79WA-4265 Menlo Park, CA 94025 13. Type of Ropott ond Period Co,ered ~~~----~--~--~~--------------------------~12. Sponaorint Agency Nome ond Addreu Department of Transportation Final Report Federal Aviation Administration Office of Systems Engineering Management 14. Sponsoring Atency Code Washington, D.C. 20591 FAA-AEM IS. Suppl-ontory Notea 16. Abatract The Oceanic (and selected Non-dceanic) Area System Improvement Study (OASIS), conducted by SRI International under contract with the Federal Aviation Adminis­ tration (FAA), waa part of a broad oceanic aeronautical system improvement study program coordinated by the "Committee to Review the Application of Satellite and Other Techniques .to Civil Aviation" (also called the Aviation Review Coalnittee or the ARC). The OASIS Project, with inputs from the international aviation com­ munity, examined current and potential future oceanic air traffic control (ATC) systems in the North Atlantic (NAT), Central East Pacific (CEP), and Caribbean (CAR) regions. This phase of the Aviation Review Committee program began in late-1978 and was completed in mid-1981. · The thrust of the Aviation Review Committee program, which OASIS broadly supported, was to analyze the present ATC systems; examine future system require­ ments; identify areas where the present systems might be improved; and develop and analyze potential system improvement options. The time frame of this study is the period 1979 to 2005. This report describes the present air traffic services (ATS) system in the NAT region. This system provides ATC, flight information, and alerting services to aircraft in oceanic control areas (CTAa)/flight informaton regions (FIRs). The report address.es the operations, technical components, and costs of the following ATS units: Gander Area Control Center (ACC); Shanwick Oceanic Area Control Center (OACC); New York ACC; Santa Maria ACC; Reykjavik ACC; San Juan ACC, and Miami ACC. 17. Key Word a 18. Diatrilluti ... Stot-ent North Atlantic (NAT), Document is available to the U.S. Air Traffic Services (ATS), public through the National Technical Oceanic Air Traffic Control (ATC) Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Socut~ty Cloud. (of this <aport) 20. Secvrity Clauil. (of thia povol 21· No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified Form DOT F 1700.7 ca-721 Reproduction of completed po9o outhoriaod Oceanic Area System Improvement Study (OASIS) Final Report This report is one of a set of companion documents which includes the following volumes: Volume I Executive Summary and Improvement Alternatives Development and Analysis Volume II North Atlantie Region Air Traffic Services System Description Volume III Central East Pacific Region Air Traffic Services System Description Volume IV Caribbean Region Air Traffic Services System Description Volume V North Atlantic, Central East Pacific, and Caribbean Regions , Communication Systems Description Volume VI North Atlantic, Central East Pacific, and Caribbean Regions Navigation Systems Description Volume VII North Atlantic Region Flight Cost Model Results Volume VIII Central East Pacific Region Flight Cost Model Results Volume IX Flight Cost Model Description Volume X North Atlantic, Central East Pacific, and Caribbean Regions Aviation Traffic Forecasts PREFACE The Oceanic Area System Improvement Study (OASIS) was cond1;1cted i~. coordination ~ith the "Committee to Review the Applications of Sa~ellite and Other Techniques to Civil Aviation." This study examined the opera­ tional, technQlQgical, and economic aspects of the current and propos-ed future oceanic air traffic systems in the North Atlantic (NAT), Caribbean (CAR), and Central East Pacific (CEP) regions and assessed the relative merits of improvement options. A key requirement of this study was to develop a detailed description of the present air traffic system. In support of this requirement, and in cooperation with working groups of the Committee, questionnaires were distributed to the providers and users of the oceanic air traffic systems. Responses to these questionnaires, special reports prepared by system provider organizations, other publica­ tions, and field observations made by the OASIS staff were the basis for the systems descriptions presented in this report. The .description·s also were based on information obtained during Working Group A and B meetings and workshops sponsored by Working Group A. The information given in this report documents the state of the oceanic air traffic system in mid 1979. In the 'course of the work valuable contributions, advice, data, and opinions were received from a number of sources both in the United States and outside it. Valuable information and guidance were received and utilized from the International Civil Aviaiton Organization (ICAO), North Atlantic Systems Planning Group (NAT/SPG), the North Atlantic Traffic Forecast Group (NAT/TFG), several administrations, the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the airlines, the International Federation of Airline Pilots Association (IFALPA), other aviation associated organi­ zations, and especially from the Committee to Review the Applications of Satellites and Other Techniques to Civil Aviation. It is understood of course, and should be noted, that participation in this work or contribution to it does not imply either endorsement or agreement to the findings by any contributors or policy agreement by any administration which graciou.sly chose to contribute. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE • • • • • . • i TABLE OF CONTENTS • iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS • vii LIST OF TABLES ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS XV ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS xvii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 G~neral • • • • • • • • • • 1 1.2 Scope and Objective •• 1 1.3 Contents of Thi~ Report • 1 1.4 ATS Requirements 2 2.0 ATS OVERVIEW--NAT OPERATING ENVIRONMENT 7 2.1 Background • • • • • • • 7 2.2 Air Traffic Flow Patterns 7 2.3 Airspace Organization and ATS Facilities 10 2.4 Technical Systems Overview 13 2.5 Oceanic Route Struytures 14 2.6 ATS Operating Procedures 19 3.0 ATS TECHNICAL STRUCTURE 25 3.1 Introduction 25 3.2 Communications Systems 25 3.3 Navigation Systems 29 3.4 Surveillance Systems •••• 30 4.0 SEPARATION MINL~A 33 4.1 Separation Minima Determination • 33 4.2 NAT Separation Standards Documentation 34 4.3 Vertical Separation • • • • • • • • • • 34 4.4 Lateral Separation 34 4.5 Longitudinal Separation 35 4.6 Composite Separation 36 4.7 Minimum Navigation Performance Specifications 37 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 5.0 ORGANIZED TRACK SYSTEM • o o 5ol Historical Perspective 41 5o2 OTS Establishment Guidelines 41 5o3 OTS Establishment Procedures 43 5o4 OTS Establishment Practices o . 44 6.0 OPERATING PROCEDURES • 53 6.1 Flight Planning 53 6.2 Domestic Airspace Operations 54 6.3 Oceanic Entry Operations 55 6.4 Oceanic Airspace Operations •• 58 6.5 Oceanic Exit Operations • • • 62 6.6 Supersonic Transport Operations ••••••• 63 6.7 Low Level Oceanic Operations •••• 63 6.8 Current Plans for Improvement • • • 64 6.9 Supplemental Operational Information • • • • 64 7.0 ATS COSTS--PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES ••••• 65 APPENDIX A GANDER ACe-SUPPLEMENTAL DESCRIPTIVE DATA (Excerpts from a Draft by Transport Canada) • 67 APPENDIX B SHANWICK OACC--SUPPLEMENTAL DESCRIPTIVE DATA (Excerpts from a Drafy by the CAA, UK) 79 APPENDIX C NEW YORK ACC--SUPPLEMENTAL DESCRIPTIVE DATA • • 91 APPENDIX D SANTA MARIA ACe--SUPPLEMENTAL DESCRIPTIVE DATA (Excerpts from an ACO Letter Draft Report) 101 APPENDIX E REYKJAVIK ACC--SUPPLEMENTAL DESCRIPTIVE DATA (Excerpts from a Paper by DCA, Iceland) 105 APPENDIX F SONDRESTROM FIG--SUPPLEMENTARY DESCRIPTIVE DATA (Excerpts from a Report by DCA, Denmark) 111 APPENDIX G SAN JUAN ACe--SUPPLEMENTAL DESCRIPTIVE DATA 117 APPENDIX H MIAMI ACe--SUPPLEMENTAL DESCRIPTIVE DATA 121 APPENDIX I NAT REGION SEPARATION STANDARDS (Excerpts from ICAO Doc. 7030) . 125 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS (Concluded) APPENDIX J METEOROLOGICAL DATA AND METHODS USED lN GENERATING THE AVIAtiON DIGITAL FORECAST APPENDIX K SELECTED OPERATIONAL SITUATIONS 139 APPENDIX L ATS ANNUAL COST CALCULATIONS 145 REFERENCES
Recommended publications
  • B576/Y722 & Y711
    Operations Notice Number: ON 002/2017 Title: INTERSECTION OF AIRWAYS A593 – B576/Y722 & Y711 (the so-called ‘AKARA Corridor’) Applicable to: Operations in the Southern part of INCHEON FIR Effective date: 06 November 2017 Expiry: Until Further Notice Authorized by: Senior Vice President Safety and Flight Operations (SFO) IATA Contact e-mail: [email protected] This Operational Notice informs and reminds airlines of a unique arrangement over international waters agreed under a 1983 Memorandum of Understanding between China, Japan, Republic of Korea and ICAO for the management of air traffic in the southern part of the current INCHEON Flight Information Region (see attached map). The airspace is commonly referred to as the AKARA Corridor. Instead of responsibility for the control of ALL aircraft operating at the crossing point of air routes A593 and B576/Y722 (position NIRAT) and Y711 (position PONIK) being vested in a single air traffic control unit, it is vested under both the INCHEON Area Control Center (ACC) and the FUKUOKA ACC. Aircraft operating East/West on A593 are controlled by FUKUOKA ACC1 (crossing Y711 at position PONIK and B576/Y722 at position NIRAT). Aircraft operating North/South on B576 and Y711 are under the control of INCHEON ACC. Therefore, crossing traffic is not on the same ATC frequency, nor controlled from the same area control center. Following the implementation of RVSM in the INCHEON FIR in 2005, the allocation of flight levels on B576/Y711 was increased from 6 to 8 flight levels. Coincident with implementation of RVSM in China, levels available on A593 were also increased to include Flight Levels 300 and 310, while FL410 was replaced by FL400.
    [Show full text]
  • NAV CANADA and DATA LINK IMPLEMENTATION
    NAV CANADA and DATA LINK IMPLEMENTATION Shelley Bailey NAV CANADA May 2016 – Sint Maarten OPDWLG – Operational Data Link Working Group • 5 members here today representing ANSPs, manufacturers and regulators • Small representation of a multi-disciplinary group made up of such groups as, human factors specialists, regulators, aircraft systems specialists, air carriers, pilots, and controllers. • Make recommendations on operational datalink to the ANC. About NAV CANADA • Private, non-share capital company • 18 million square km of airspace • 2nd largest ANSP in the world • Regulated by Federal Government • 12 million aircraft movements on safety performance annually 3 Our People 4,600 employees across the country • Air Traffic Controllers • Engineering and IM • Flight Service Specialists • Corporate Functions • Electronics Technologists 4 Canadian Airspace Characteristics • Vast distances • Busiest oceanic airspace • Climate varies from polar in the world to temperate • Unique northern airspace operations • Crossroads of global air traffic flows • Stimulus for innovation 5 6 System Progress Investment $2 billion in new technology and facilities since 1996. 7 DATA LINK IN CANADA • OCEANIC SERVICES • DOMESTIC SERVICE • TOWERS 8 Gander Oceanic Controls between 1400-1600 transatlantic flights per day Two primary traffic flows Eastbound – catches the winds of the Jetstream Westbound – avoid the Jetstream winds First data link services to a FANS1/A aircraft was in 2001 Introduced the NAT Data Link Mandate in 2013 Now using 3 data link based
    [Show full text]
  • Warranted Surveillance? Evaluating the Economic Case for Space-Based Ads-B
    WARRANTED SURVEILLANCE? EVALUATING THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR SPACE-BASED ADS-B by Dorothy Robyn and Kevin Neels January 2017 The authors prepared this report as an independent, self-funded research endeavor. (The research grew out of discussions with Aireon but we ultimately chose to pursue it independently.) We want to acknowledge the many individuals who agreed to be interviewed as part of our research and who reviewed the report in draft. We specifically want to thank Aireon for its cooperation, including its willingness to share the results of the ISA analysis described in Section IV. All results and any errors are the responsibility of the authors. Copyright © 2017 The Brattle Group, Inc. Table of Contents Summary............................................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. The Evolution of Air Traffic Surveillance .................................................................................. 4 A. Real-Time Surveillance and Tactical Control ................................................................... 4 B. Position Reporting and Procedural Control ..................................................................... 5 1. New Concepts of Operations in the North Atlantic Region .................................. 7 2. U.S. Oceanic Airspace ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Acronyms
    Aviation Acronyms 5010 AIRPORT MASTER RECORD (FAA FORM 5010-1) 7460-1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION 7480-1 NOTICE OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL 99'S NINETY-NINES (WOMEN PILOTS' ASSOCIATION) A/C AIRCRAFT A/DACG ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE AIRFIELD CONTROL GROUP A/FD AIRPORT/FACILITY DIRECTORY A/G AIR - TO - GROUND A/G AIR/GROUND AAA AUTOMATED AIRLIFT ANALYSIS AAAE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES AAC MIKE MONRONEY AERONAUTICAL CENTER AAI ARRIVAL AIRCRAFT INTERVAL AAIA AIRPORT AND AIRWAY IMPROVEMENT ACT AALPS AUTOMATED AIR LOAD PLANNING SYSTEM AANI AIR AMBULANCE NETWORK AAPA ASSOCIATION OF ASIA-PACIFIC AIRLINES AAR AIRPORT ACCEPTANCE RATE AAS ADVANCED AUTOMATION SYSTEM AASHTO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AC AIRCRAFT COMMANDER AC AIRFRAME CHANGE AC AIRCRAFT AC AIR CONTROLLER AC ADVISORY CIRCULAR AC ASPHALT CONCRETE ACAA AIR CARRIER ACCESS ACT ACAA AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ACAIS AIR CARRIER ACTIVITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ACC AREA CONTROL CENTER ACC AIRPORT CONSULTANTS COUNCIL ACC AIRCRAFT COMMANDER ACC AIR CENTER COMMANDER ACCC AREA CONTROL COMPUTER COMPLEX ACDA APPROACH CONTROL DESCENT AREA ACDO AIR CARRIER DISTRICT OFFICE ACE AVIATION CAREER EDUCATION ACE CENTRAL REGION OF FAA ACF AREA CONTROL FACILITY ACFT AIRCRAFT ACI-NA AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL - NORTH AMERICA ACID AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION ACIP AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING ACLS AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ACLT ACTUAL CALCULATED LANDING TIME Page 2 ACMI AIRCRAFT, CREW, MAINTENANCE AND INSURANCE (cargo) ACOE U.S. ARMY
    [Show full text]
  • November 2020 Vol
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION OPERATORS SURVEY GULFSTREAM G500 AIREON IN SERVICE ADJUSTING APPROAC NOVEMBER 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation OPERATORS SURVEY Gulfstream G500 A step change in aircraft design H SPEED NOVEMBER 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 10 H SPEED NOVEMBER 2020 VOL. 116 NO. ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Aireon in Service Winter Ground Ops Adjusting Approach Speed Flying Petri Dish C&C: Stop. Look. Think. Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent.
    [Show full text]
  • YPAM QUESTIONNAIRE Translation in English, Prepared by SPOA and Inviting Constructive Comments at [email protected] January 2018
    YPAM QUESTIONNAIRE translation in English, prepared by SPOA and inviting constructive comments at [email protected] January 2018 ~NAVIGATION~ A1.All pilots know that the earth’s magnetic field pulls the needle of a compass and always turns it to the North. They also know this Northerly direction shown by the compass is called… a) The so called magnetic North . b) A point on the earth, a thousand miles south to the North Pole . c) Bathurst Island in the Arctic Ocean . d) All the above. A2.In navigation “Variation” is called… a) The difference(in degrees) between true north and magnetic north. b) The difference(in degrees) between compass heading and magnetic north. c) The difference(in degrees) between true heading and compass heading. d) None of the above. A3.In all aircraft, it is observed the so called Compass Deviation. During maintance there is an effort to reduce this by adjusting magnetic materials. All pilots know that Compass Deviation is: a) The difference(in degrees) between true north and magnetic north. b) The difference(in degrees) between compass heading and magnetic north. c) The difference(in degrees) between true heading and compass heading. d) None of the above. A4. The Magnetic Compass in an YPAM as well as on every other aircraft is… a) The most important air navigation instrument . b) The most primitive air navigation instrument . c) The most sensitive air navigation instrument . d) All of the above are true. A5.The indication of the magnetic compass is affected by the acceleration and deceleration of the aircraft .If an YPAM flying in Greece Eastbound, decelerates , then the compass will indicate : a) Apparent turn to the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Gen 3.4 Communication Services
    08 OCT 2020 AIP IRELAND GEN 3.4 - 1 08 OCT 2020 GEN 3.4 COMMUNICATION SERVICES 1. RESPONSIBLE SERVICE The Aeronautical Communications Services in Ireland are administered by: Post: The Irish Aviation Authority The Times Building 11-12 D’Olier Street Dublin 2 D02 T449 Ireland Phone: + 353 (0)1 671 8655 Fax: + 353 (0)1 679 2934 1.1 Applicable ICAO Documents ICAO standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures contained in the following documents are applied (subject to any differences recorded in the Supplement there to). • Annex 2 - Rules of the Air • Annex 10 - Aeronautical Telecommunications • Annex 11 - Air Traffic Services • Annex 15 - Aeronautical Information Services • DOC 4444 - Procedures for Air Navigation Services - Air Traffic Management (PANS-ATM) • DOC 7030 - Regional Supplementary Procedures • DOC 7910 - Location Indicators • DOC 8400 - Abbreviations and Codes • DOC 8585 - Designators for Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities and Services • Doc 9694 - Manual of Air Traffic Services (ATS) Data Link Applications. Global Air Navigation Plan for CNS/ ATM Systems (Doc 9750-AN/963,). • Global Operational Data Link Document (GOLD)(DOC 10037) • Satellite Voice Operations Manual (SVOM) (DOC 10038) 2. AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY Aviation Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Services are provided for 2.1. The SHANNON Flight Information Region (FIR) and the SHANNON Upper Flight Information Region (UIR). 2.2. The SHANNON Oceanic Transition Area (SOTA), an area of UK controlled airspace delegated through international agreement to the Irish Aviation Authority. 2.3. The Northern Oceanic Transition Area (NOTA), an area of UK controlled airspace delegated through international agreement to the Irish Aviation Authority. 2.4. Aeronautical Communication Services in the SHANWICK Oceanic Control Area of the ICAO North Atlantic region are provided, through international agreement, by SHANWICK Aeradio, an aeronautical communications facility operated by the Irish Aviation Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Benefits of Space-Based ADS-B
    Environmental Benefits of Space-based ADS-B Karen Marais, Ph.D. Associate Professor School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University December 2016 Executive Summary. Commercial aviation worldwide contributes about 2% of global manmade CO2 emissions annually [ICAO, 2016a]. Efforts are proceeding along many fronts to reduce aviation’s environmental impact. This year, the UN’s International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) recommended the first-ever CO2 certification standard for commercial aircraft. The Air Transport Action Group (ATAG), an international coalition of aerospace manufacturers, airlines, airports and air navigation service providers, is committed to improving overall fuel efficiency by 1.5% annually through 2020. Advances in sustainable alternative jet fuel research and development could turn commercially viable, low-carbon fuels from fantasy to reality in the not-too-distant future. But, among all of these efforts, only operational efficiency improvements—reducing the amount of fuel or time it takes an aircraft to go from point A to point B—bring immediate CO2 reductions. Efforts to improve one area of operational efficiency—Air Traffic Management—have centered mostly on areas where aircraft are under constant radar control. Examples of operational efficiency improvements include single-engine taxi procedures, continuous/idle power descents, and optimized profile descents and approaches during which aircraft fly shorter approach patterns at lower power settings [Marais et al., 2013]. One area for significant operational and procedural improvement remains underexploited: remote and oceanic airspace. In contrast to air traffic control over land, where controllers use real time radar returns to monitor and separate aircraft, air traffic control over the Atlantic Ocean and other remote regions must be performed without radar data.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic (NAT) Resources for U.S. Operators
    Version 13.3 NAT Resources for U.S. Operators Reviewed Monthly This resource document consolidates U.S. and International guidance for U.S. operators. Please direct questions regarding NAT operations to your Regional (AXX-220) NextGen Special Emphasis Items Areas of Operation (SAO) Specialist. Contact us via email with Initiatives your questions and comments pertaining to this PDF document. NAT Airspace References Caption describing picture or Com / Nav / Surveillance (CNS) graphic. Inspector Guidance Contact US Video: Track Wise Send Comments New York 50/30/30 Notice NEW! Frequently Asked Questions SAFO 13004 NAT OPS Bulletin 2013-001, Information & Acronyms Guidance for Data Link Oceanic Clearance Delivery in Santa Maria FIR NAT Emphasis Items ● NAT Home ● Emphasis Items ● SLOP ● Contingency References ● Flight Planning NAT EMPHASIS ITEMS Implementation of 50 NM Longitudinal, 30 NM Longitudinal and 30 NM Lateral Separation Minima in the New York Oceanic Control Area (CTA) Flight Information Regional (FIR) (Select current edition and then go to Part 3, Section 2, International Oceanic Airspace Notices) NEW! NAT OPS Bulletin 2012-031: NAT Region Data Link Mandate Failure to comply with ATC clearances in Oceanic Airspace - International NOTAMS (Select current edition and then go to Part 3, Section 2, International Oceanic Airspace Notices) International NOTAMS (Select current edition and then go to Part 3, Section 2, International Oceanic Airspace Notices) SAFO 13004 Errors Associated with Oceanic Clearances NAT Doc 007 North Atlantic Operations and Airspace Manual - Chapter 5: Oceanic ATC Clearances Chapter 8: MNPS Flight Operation and Navigation Procedures Chapter 14: Checklist for Pilots Operating in NAT MNPS Airspace Chapter 15: Guarding Against Complacency Gross Navigation Errors (GNE), Large Height Deviations (LHD) and Erosion of Longitudinal Spacing 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Acronysm
    A 5010 AIRPORT MASTER RECORD (FAA FORM 5010-1) 7460-1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION 7480-1 NOTICE OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL 99'S NINETY-NINES (WOMEN PILOTS' ASSOCIATION) A/DACG ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE AIRFIELD CONTROL GROUP A/FD AIRPORT/FACILITY DIRECTORY A/G AIR - TO - GROUND A/G AIR/GROUND AAA AUTOMATED AIRLIFT ANALYSIS AAAE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES AAC MIKE MONRONEY AERONAUTICAL CENTER AAI ARRIVAL AIRCRAFT INTERVAL AAIA AIRPORT AND AIRWAY IMPROVEMENT ACT AALPS AUTOMATED AIR LOAD PLANNING SYSTEM AANI AIR AMBULANCE NETWORK AAPA ASSOCIATION OF ASIA-PACIFIC AIRLINES AAR AIRPORT ACCEPTANCE RATE AAS ADVANCED AUTOMATION SYSTEM AASHTO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY & TRANSP OFFICIALS AC A/C ACFT AIRCRAFT - AIRCRAFT COMMANDER - AIRFRAME CHANGE – AIRCRAFT - AIR CONTROLLER - ADVISORY CIRCULAR - ASPHALT CONCRETE ACAA AIR CARRIER ACCESS ACT ACAA AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ACAIS AIR CARRIER ACTIVITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ACC AREA CONTROL CENTER - AIRPORT CONSULTANTS COUNCIL - AIRCRAFT COMMANDER - AIR CENTER COMMANDER ACCC AREA CONTROL COMPUTER COMPLEX ACDA APPROACH CONTROL DESCENT AREA ACDO AIR CARRIER DISTRICT OFFICE ACE AVIATION CAREER EDUCATION ACE CENTRAL REGION OF FAA ACF AREA CONTROL FACILITY ACI-NA AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL - NORTH AMERICA ACID AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION ACIP AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING ACLS AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ACLT ACTUAL CALCULATED LANDING TIME ACMI AIRCRAFT, CREW, MAINTENANCE AND INSURANCE (cargo) ACOE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AD AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic En Route Air Traffic
    AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Irish Authority Evolves text messages rather than by voice. a SESAR (Single Europe- The Irish Aviation As of March, according to the Sin- an Sky ATM Research) Authority’s Shannon Area as Europe’s ‘Gateway’ gle European Sky ATM Research project will be relocated Control Center near (SESAR) Deployment Manager, 16 to the Shannon ACC. Con- Shannon Airport manages states complied with ground-network trollers there eventually THE SHANNON AREA CONTROL CENTER IS THE INTERFACE air traffic in Irish airspace > requirements of the European Com- will manage movements at reaching into the North mission’s Data Link Services mandate, Shannon Airport, which Atlantic Ocean. > FREE-ROUTE AIRSPACE AND DATA LINK ARE INTRODUCED which air navigation service providers handled 1.86 million pas- (ANSP) were required to meet by Feb- sengers and 25,556 takeoffs ing ANSPs Nav Canada, Bill Carey Ballygirreen, Ireland ruary 2018. and landings last year. Naviair and Italy’s Enav Described as a commercial semi- In 2006, the IAA was a as well as Iridium Com- time line from the past to the and southern oceanic transition areas. state company, the IAA generates most founding member of the Co- munications. UK NATS future runs through the Irish Airspace sections the ACC manages of its revenue by charging airspace us- operation between Air Nav- joined the company in ers for air traffic control (ATC) services A Aviation Authority’s (IAA) serve as the interface between North igation Service Providers BILL CAREY/AW&ST May 2018. North Atlantic Communications Cen- Atlantic oceanic and European domes- and receives no government funding.
    [Show full text]
  • NATS Statement of Case
    Prepared by: NATS (En Route) plc NATS Protected NATS (En Route) plc CMA Statement of Case - 28 November 2019 [RP3 Reference: NERL003] NATS PROTECTED NATS (En Route) plc 2 NATS Protected Page 2 of 199 NATS (En Route) plc 3 Table of contents 1. Foreword 8 1.1. Foreword by Martin Rolfe, CEO 8 2. Introduction 11 2.1. NERL’s request for a redetermination 11 2.2. Areas of focus for the CMA’s redetermination 13 2.2.1. Setting the right opex allowance 13 2.2.2. Setting the right capex allowance 14 2.2.3. Achieving the right level of capex governance 14 2.2.4. Facilitating technology based improvements in the Oceanic service 16 2.2.5. Setting the right cost of capital 16 2.3. Overview of the areas of difference between NERL and the CAA 17 2.4. Structure of the Statement of Case 19 3. Background to RP3 and the context for the CMA’s redetermination 23 3.1. Overview 23 3.2. Our approach to RP3 23 3.2.1. Key challenges facing NERL in RP3 23 3.2.2. The impact of our experience during RP2 32 3.2.3. Our approach to developing the RP3 business plan 36 3.2.4. We consider that our RP3 business plan best serves the public interest 40 3.3. Our concerns with the CAA’s RP3 Decision 43 3.3.1. The CAA’s RP3 Decision does not achieve the right balance in the public interest 43 3.3.2. Concerns about the CAA’s evidence base 45 3.4.
    [Show full text]