DOCSLIB.ORG

Styles Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Styles Template Division of Transportation Engineering http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/midcountycorridorstudy Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study June 2010 DRAFT Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Engineering 100 Edison Park Drive, 4th Floor Gaithersburg, MD 20878 PHONE: 240-777-7220 FAX: 240-777-7277 http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/midcountycorridorstudy MIDCOUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY ALTERNATIVES RETAINED FOR DETAILED STUDY / June 2010 DRAFT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LEAD AGENCY Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) CONCURRING AGENCIES US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Lead US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) REVIEWING AGENCIES US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Maryland Historic Trust (MHT) Maryland State Highway Administration (MSHA) Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) City of Gaithersburg CONSULTANTS Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP (RK&K) A. Morton Thomas, Inc. Charles A. Davis Elizabeth Anderson Comer/Archaeology (EAC/A) Paula S. Reed Associates, Inc. MIDCOUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY ALTERNATIVES RETAINED FOR DETAILED STUDY / June 2010 DRAFT SUMMARY A. PURPOSE OF SUBMITTAL The Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) is hereby presenting this package to request concurrence on the Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study (ARDS) for the Midcounty Corridor Study (MCS). B. PROJECT PURPOSE MCDOT is performing the Midcounty Corridor Study to relieve projected congestion on the roadways between Gaithersburg and Clarksburg; improve mobility east of I-270; improve traffic safety and efficiency; improve vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access to destinations within the study area; and to develop these improvements in an environmental sensitive manner. C. ALTERNATIVES RETAINED FOR DETAILED STUDY The Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study, commonly referred to as ARDS, is a document to summarize and compare the initial alternatives and recommends those to be carried forward for detailed study. For the Midcounty Corridor Study (MCS), eleven (11) alternatives were evaluated that consisted of proposed improvements to existing roadways as well as new roadway alignment (with 3 different northern terminus options) as recommended in area master plans. Of the eleven (11) alternatives, the following six (6) alternatives and two (2) Master Plan Alignment Northern Terminus options are recommended for detailed study: • Alternative 1, No Build; • Alternative 2, Transportation Systems Management/Transportation Demand Management; • Alternative 4, Goshen-Wightman-Brink; • Alternative 5, MD 355; • Alternative 8, Master Plan Alignment from Watkins Mill Road; • Alternative 9, Master Plan Alignment; and • Master Plan Alignment Northern Terminus: Options A and C D. ALTERNATIVES NOT RECOMMENDED FOR DETAILED STUDY Of the eleven (11) alternatives, the following five (5) alternatives and one (1) northern terminus option are not recommended: • Alternative 3, Montgomery Village-Wightman-Brink; • Alternative 6, MD 355-Lower & Upper Watkins Mill-Master Plan Alignment; • Alternative 7, MD 355-Middlebrook-Master Plan Alignment; • Alternative 10, Muncaster Mill-Snouffer School-Wightman-Brink (both Options A and B); • Alternative 11, Montgomery Village-Stedwick-Upper Watkins Mill-Master Plan Alignment; and • Northern Terminus of Master Plan Alignment: Option B. These recommendations were based on a comparison of each alternative’s transportation benefits; impacts to the natural, built, and social environment; and public and agency input. MIDCOUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY ALTERNATIVES RETAINED FOR DETAILED STUDY / June 2010 DRAFT MIDCOUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY ALTERNATIVES RETAINED FOR DETAILED STUDY / June 2010 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 A. PROJECT HISTORY ..........................................................................................................1 B. MASTER PLANS ................................................................................................................2 C. STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................2 II. PURPOSE AND NEED ..............................................................................................................5 A. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................5 B. NEED ...................................................................................................................................5 III. EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS EVALUATED DURING PRELIMINARY SCREENING.................................................................................................7 A. ENVIRONMENTAL, CULTURAL, AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES .......................7 1. Natural Resources ..........................................................................................................7 a. Wetlands ..................................................................................................................7 b. Wetlands of Special State Concern ..........................................................................7 c. Streams .....................................................................................................................7 d. Colonial Nesting Bird Habitat .................................................................................7 e. Federal and State Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species (RTE) ......................7 f. Biodiversity Areas ...................................................................................................8 g. Special Protection Areas (SPAs) .............................................................................8 h. Best Natural Areas ...................................................................................................9 i. Greenways................................................................................................................9 j. Habitat for Forest Interior Dwelling Species (FIDS) ...............................................9 k. Floodplains ...............................................................................................................9 l. Forest (upland) .........................................................................................................9 m. Farmland ..................................................................................................................9 2. Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................10 a. Historic Architecture ..............................................................................................10 b. Archeological Sites ................................................................................................10 3. Community Resources .................................................................................................11 a. Parks & Recreational Facilities ..............................................................................11 b. Schools ...................................................................................................................11 c. Places of Worship ..................................................................................................11 4. Hazardous Material Sites .............................................................................................11 5. Property ........................................................................................................................12 B. TRANSPORTATION ........................................................................................................13 1. Relieve Projected Roadway Congestion in Year 2030 ................................................13 2. Improve Safety and Efficiency. ...................................................................................14 3. Improve Bicycle and Pedestrian Access ......................................................................14 i MIDCOUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY ALTERNATIVES RETAINED FOR DETAILED STUDY / June 2010 DRAFT IV. DEVELOPMENT AND DESCRIPTION OF PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVES..........15 A. STUDY CORRIDORS ......................................................................................................15 B. ALTERNATIVES..............................................................................................................17 1. Alternative 1, No Build ................................................................................................17 The No-Build Alternative’s improvements are also the base for all other alternatives.2. Alterna tive 2, Transportation System Management/Travel Demand Management ................18 2. Alternative 2, Transportation System Management/Travel Demand Management .................................................................................................................19 3. Alternatives 3 through 11.............................................................................................21 a. Alternative 3, Montgomery Village – Wightman – Brink .....................................22 b. Alternative 4, Goshen – Wightman – Brink ..........................................................24 c. Alternative 5, MD 355 ...........................................................................................26
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Msa S1885 000049.Pdf
    ^7 ^k^ THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING CGMMISSIGN 8787 Georgia Avenue • Silver Spring. Maryland 20910-3760 (301) 495-4613 H i 1 RECEIVED SEP 29 1995 September 24,1993 HIGHWAY INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION NOTICE 0^ STREET NAME CHANGE On January 9,1992 the Montgomery County Planning Board changed the name of a section of Darnestown Germantown Road (State Rt.118) to BO'LAND FARM ROAD due to road relocation. This name change will require a change of address for all residents or businesses in the 20300 through and including the 20600 blocks. Construction schedules indicate that new street signs would be installed in approximately mid-October to coincide with the opening of the new relocated Route 118. Please make all appropriate changes to your records. Questions regarding this change should be addressed to the Street Name Section of this C omm is s ion. F.H. Flahar ty Street Name Section MONTGOMERY COUNTY "^K'SS^1 ne Gemantown Gazette - 4-14-93 Progress continues on Rte. 355,118 by J*n Allonoch SloW wnur . Motonsts are now able to drWeon the new portion of MarilandRoute^near u'es oiTtHe improvements to the two streets in Germantown. According to Mark Aeb.g. the Mon - comery County mon.tor of the $4.5 mil ^instruction project, the two^phase oroiect consists of widening Route 3M and the extension of Route 118 through Montcomerv roHege. Photo by Ron Agnlr lnltial widening of Route 355 the first nhase of the project, began last fall and Crews and heavy equipment moved to the northbound lanes of Route 355 in Germantown last week to shouW be finished in July.
    [Show full text]
  • West Germantown Development
    OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MARCH 22, 2002 NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Fitch Ratings: AA Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group: AA In the opinion of Bond Counsel, assuming continued compliance with certain covenants described herein, under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, interest on the 2002A Bonds is excludable from the gross income of the recipients thereof for federal income tax purposes under the Code, and such interest will not be treated as a preference item in calculating the alternative minimum tax that may be imposed on individuals and corporations. Under the Code, interest on the 2002A Bonds is to be taken into account in the computation of certain taxes that may be imposed with respect to corporations, including, without limitation, the alternative minimum tax, the environmental tax and the foreign branch profits tax. The principal amount of the 2002A Bonds, their transfer, the interest payable thereon and any income derived therefrom, including any profit realized on their sale or exchange, shall be exempt at all times from every kind and nature of taxation by the State of Maryland or by any of its political subdivisions, municipal corporations or public agencies of any kind; however, the law of the State of Maryland does not expressly refer to, and no opinion is expressed concerning, estate or inheritance taxes, or any other taxes not levied directly on the 2002A Bonds or the interest thereon. See “TAX EXEMPTIONS” herein. $11,600,000 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND SPECIAL OBLIGATION BONDS (WEST GERMANTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) SENIOR SERIES 2002A Dated: April 1, 2002 Due: July 1, shown on inside cover page The Montgomery County, Maryland Special Obligation Bonds (West Germantown Development District), Senior Series 2002A (the “2002A Bonds”) are being issued by Montgomery County, Maryland (the “County”) only in fully registered form, in denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Clopper Grist Mill Montgomery Co., MD C. Mazurek October 22, 1997 Section 7.1
    M 19-21 Clopper Grist Mill Montgomery Co., MD C. Mazurek October 22, 1997 Section 7.1 Addendum Nothing has changed on the Clopper Grist Mill since the last survey of this structure was taken in 1984. M: 19-21 c. 1777-c. 1880 Clopper Mill Ruins Clopper Road at Great Seneca Creek Gaithersburg The ruins of this large brick and stone mill stand on the west bank of Great Seneca Creek, just south of Clopper Road near the intersection of Waring Station Road. It was a square, three-story grist mill, with basement and first floor levels of local fieldstone and a third story of brick. The original (Sybert) mill was apparently rebuilt by Maccubbin, then underwent substantial modifications during the time it was owned by Clopper (1812-1868). The ruins bear the initials of Francis C. Clopper and the date 1834. Recent exacavations in the Seneca Creek valley have disturbed the old mill dam and mill races. The Woodlands Mansion was demolished in the 1960s. The earliest mention of a mill on this site occurs in 1777, when Nicholas Sybert conveyed his mill and watercourses with 222 acres to Benjamin Spyker. The site was along an early ea~t-west route. Zachariah Maccubbin purchased land in the area in 1774, agreeing 9 years later to buy the mill from William Benson. After Benson's death left Maccubbin with no clear title, resulting in years of litigation, Maccubbin was forced to sell his property in 1808. (Assessments indicate that between 1792 and 1795 he tore down the old mill and built a new one.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Ej?W Amwn 141 7M Uc Ns7wjgt I R~
    6Ej?W AmWN 141 7M uc NS7wjGT I r~. MM Parking Lots/Parking Garage ^, I wesp . - ~~;~(; Gazette .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - V~ednesday, 'I10;1996 g Parking parkingMARC plan garage on MTA-has put on hold.for' hold plans for \\~~,a~'S' h:Nqyi, ~'»q.ir ,.., . ,;~!-.,"`3., µ x .r ?, ;..'.ffi' F. .z ' .it.vaa;'a'.;.b< INIARC. 01 by Karen Louden ' ' " Planned o i Staff Writer <N pArlcit3g tOi Plans for a parking garage at. ~7roa a the Germantown MARC train ,~ 118 Lot B % S station are on hold as trans-';. portation officials look at an'al- p #g ternative to accommodate coin- e~~•FF'~, '„yp~i.~l muters. Lot A/I The station is located in 0 Germantown's. historic district off Route 118 near Wisteria Drive. The station has two parking lots on the east side of Route 118,' one on each side of the train tracks. The existing lots can hold a total of 348 vehi- cles. 0 118 mie Last summer, the Maryland Mass Transit Administration the county, with 425. to 450 pas- 118, and recommended a more (MTA) suspended preliminary sengers daily. Philips said the modest structure of a two- or engineering and design plans parking lot is 80 to 90 percent three-story complex with 768 for a parking garage at the full each day, and plans for an- spaces. The Planning Board Maryland .Rail Commuter sta- other lot are in response to Ger= also suggested the surface lot be tion. mantown's steady increase in suspended in place of the MTA.is moving forward with population.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B July 20, 2020 (Revised October 10, 2020)
    Attachment B July 20, 2020 (Revised October 10, 2020) VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Casey Anderson, Chair and Members of the Montgomery County Planning Board of the Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Re: Request for Extension of Adequate Public Facilities Determination and associated Subdivision Regulations Waiver for QIAGEN Sciences, Inc. Campus at Germantown Business Park Dear Chair Anderson and Members of the Board: Our firm represents QIAGEN Sciences, Inc. ("QIAGEN," or the "Applicant") in connection with its property at the Germantown Business Park, located at 19300 Germantown Road in Germantown, Maryland (the "Property"). QIAGEN is a global biotechnology company, and the Property serves as its North American headquarters and manufacturing and distribution center (the "Germantown Headquarters"). On behalf of the Applicant, we respectfully submit this request to extend the Adequate Public Facilities ("APF") determination validity period for the Germantown Headquarters for an additional 72 months (i.e., 6 years), or until August 29, 2026 (the "Extension"), with an associated request for a waiver pursuant to Section 50.9.1-3 of the Montgomery County Subdivision Regulations ("Subdivision Regulations") (the "Waiver").1 The Montgomery County Planning Board ("Planning Board") last reviewed and approved a site plan amendment for the Property – Site Plan Amendment No. 81998022I – on December 19, 2019 ("Amendment I "). The purpose of Amendment I was to allow the Applicant to refine plans for the building to be constructed as the next phase of development at the Germantown Headquarters, which has been built out incrementally over time. Amendment I also addressed other modest changes for the existing building complex and site, including renovations to portions of the existing building façades to conform to the new building, the creation of a secure physical corridor connector between the existing and future buildings, and modified landscaping.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Letter of Justification for Minor Subdivision and Limited Site Plan
    August 25, 2020 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Sandra Pereira, Area 3 Regulatory Supervisor Montgomery County Planning Department 8787 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Re: Fairchild Apartments – Letter of Explanation for Minor Subdivison and Limited Site Plan Amendment Applications (the "Applications") Dear Ms. Pereira: On behalf of GTTCE Owner LLC ("GTTCE", or the "Applicant"), an affiliate of Henry Investment Partners, LLC, we respectfully submit the above-referenced Applications to the Montgomery County Planning Department ("Planning Department") for concurrent review. The Applications request the following: (i) Approval of a minor subdivision application ("Minor Subdivision") by the Planning Department to create two new lots within an approximate 5.49 acre parcel known as "Parcel V", "Century XXI" subdivision, located in Germantown, Maryland (as defined herein, the "Property"); and (ii) Approval of a Limited Site Plan Amendment ("Limited Amendment") by the Montgomery County Planning Board ("Planning Board") to adjust certain approved setbacks for the multi-family residential building that is subject to Site Plan No. 820180220, as amended (the "Fairchild Apartments", or the "Project"), so that the approved building setbacks will be consistent with the configuration of the two new lots that the Minor Subdivision proposes within the Property. The Limited Amendment also proposes minor revisions to the previously approved layout of certain outdoor grills in the Project's courtyard to provide greater separation from the building. The Montgomery County Department of Permitting Services ("MCDPS") has recently informed the Applicant that the locations of the proposed grills should be adjusted in order to ensure compliance with applicable building and fire safety code requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • 0(!J: Legis 1 Ative
    T&E COMMITTEE #1 February 4,2013 Worksession MEMORANDUM January 31,2013 TO: Transportat~on, Infrastructure, Energy & Environment Committee FROM: Jean Arthur,0(!J: LegIs 1 atIve . AnaI yst SUBJECT: Worksession: DOT Docket No. AB729 Waters Road Abandonment Town Sector, Germantown, 2nd Election District The Applicant, M SQ., LLC, has requested that a portion of the right-of-way of Waters Road be abandoned and closed. The abandonment will allow the realignment of Waters Road to connect directly with Maryland Route 118. Currently, Waters Road ends in a cul-de-sac. All properties abutting the right-of-way to be abandoned have access to public roads and no other property owners will be affected. There is no controversy associated with this abandonment and the only issue raised by interested parties is that the applicant must grant easements to the County for maintenance and to any public utility affected. Normally, a request for abandonment with no controversy goes directly to the County Council for action. However, in this case, Council and Executive staff are requesting that the Council reject the recommendation submitted by the County Executive and instead adopt the abandonment with the conditions presented in this memorandum and the attached resolution prepared by Council staff. The hearing officer supports this request. The County Executive's designee held a public hearing on May 16,2012. Prior to the hearing, the County's Department ofTransportation requested comments from the public, government agencies and public utility companies with the following results: • Montgomery County Department of Fire and Rescue offered no objections to the abandonment, provided that the associated development must provide code compliant access approved by the Montgomery County Office of the Fire Marshal.
    [Show full text]
  • Darnestown Complex Wildland Urban Interface Fire February 19, 2011
    Darnestown Complex Wildland Urban Interface Fire February 19, 2011 Darnestown Complex Wildland Urban Interface Fire February 19, 2011 Incident Numbers 11-0020592, 11-0020604, 11-0020646 Contents LIST OF APPENICIES.................................................................................................... II INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................- 1 - INITIAL RESPONSE...................................................................................................- 3 - FUELS & FIRE BEHAVIOR........................................................................................- 4 - EXPANDING INCIDENT .............................................................................................- 5 - COMMAND STRUCTURE – 3 BRANCH CONFIGURATION ....................................- 9 - Maps of Fire Area.............................................................................................................................. - 10 - MAJOR DEMOBILIZATION AND ADDITIONAL OPERATIONAL PERIODS..........- 14 - AFTER ACTION COMMENTS..................................................................................- 15 - What Went Well ...................................................................................................................................................- 15 - Obstacles Encountered / Improvement Needed / Recommendations...............................................................- 17 - Preparation.........................................................................................................................................................-
    [Show full text]
  • MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT the MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK and PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No.: 6 Date: 11-01-18
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No.: 6 Date: 11-01-18 First National Bank - Germantown: Preliminary Plan Amendment No. 11985200A and Site Plan No. 820180140 Angelica Gonzalez, Planner Coordinator, Area 3, [email protected] 301-495-4583 Sandra Pereira, Supervisor, Area 3, [email protected] 301-495-2186 Richard Weaver, Chief, Area 3, [email protected] 301-495-4544 Completed: 10/19/18 Description A. First National Bank - Germantown: Preliminary Plan Amendment No. 11985200A: Application to replace an existing restaurant use with a 3,270 square foot bank with a drive-thru; 0.70 acres; GR -1.5 H-45 Zone; located on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Germantown Road and Crystal Rock Drive; 2009 Germantown Employment Area Sector Plan. Recommendation – Approval with conditions B. First National Bank - Germantown: Site Plan No. 820180140 : Request to replace an existing Pizza Hut restaurant with a 3,270 square foot bank with a drive -thru; 0.70 acres; GR-1.5 H-45 Zone; located on the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Germantow n Road and Crystal Rock Drive; 2009 Germantown Employment Area Sector Plan. Recommendation – Approval with conditions Applicant: DPH Architecture Acceptance Date: May 22, 2018 Review Basis: Chapter 50 & Chapter 59 Summary ▪ Staff recommends Approval with conditions to both the Preliminary Plan Amendment 11985200A and Site Plan 820180140. ▪ Site Plan review is required because a drive-thru facility is a limited use in the General Retail (GR) Zone. ▪ Applications meet the limited use standards for a bank with a drive-thru in the GR zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Qiagen: Preliminary Plan Amendment No. 11981142A
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No.: XX Date: 10-29-20 Qiagen, Preliminary Plan Amendment No. 11981142A CVAChris Van Alstyne, Senior Planner, Upcounty Planning, [email protected], 301.495.4629 SP Sandra Pereira, Supervisor, Upcounty Planning, [email protected], 301.495.2186 CS Carrie Sanders, Acting Chief, Upcounty Planning, [email protected], 301.495.4653 Completed: 10/16/20 Description Qiagen, Preliminary Plan Amendment No. 11981142A Application to extend the APF finding validity period by six years for Preliminary Plan 11981142, as amended, which includes 544,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses; located on the north side of Germantown Road (MD Route 118) at the northeastern intersection of Dawson Farm Road; 24.33 acres; zoned IM-2.5 H-80 and EOF- 1.5 H- 75; 1989 Germantown Master Plan area. Recommendation – Approval with conditions Applicant: QIAGEN Sciences, Inc. Accepted Date: August 12, 2020 Review Basis: Chapter 50, Section 4.3.J Summary • Staff recommends approval with conditions. • The Applicant requests to amend the Preliminary Plan to extend the APF validity period by six years. • The Applicant justifies the extension as necessary to expand production of COVID-19 related products. • The Applicant is requesting to waive the limited findings under 50.4.3.J.7.d.i.c, particularly the requirement that recent construction has been completed. • Staff has not received any correspondence regarding this application. SECTION 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Applicant requests, through Preliminary Plan Amendment No. 11981142A (“Application”), to amend the APF finding validity period by adding an additional six years, to August 29, 2028 for the Qiagen Preliminary Plan (“Preliminary Plan” “Plan” and “Qiagen”) APF validity and is requesting to waive limited findings of Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1
    Attachment 1 August 25, 2020 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Sandra Pereira, Area 3 Regulatory Supervisor Montgomery County Planning Department 8787 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Re: Fairchild Apartments – Letter of Explanation for Minor Subdivison and Limited Site Plan Amendment Applications (the "Applications") Dear Ms. Pereira: On behalf of GTTCE Owner LLC ("GTTCE", or the "Applicant"), an affiliate of Henry Investment Partners, LLC, we respectfully submit the above-referenced Applications to the Montgomery County Planning Department ("Planning Department") for concurrent review. The Applications request the following: (i) Approval of a minor subdivision application ("Minor Subdivision") by the Planning Department to create two new lots within an approximate 5.49 acre parcel known as "Parcel V", "Century XXI" subdivision, located in Germantown, Maryland (as defined herein, the "Property"); and (ii) Approval of a Limited Site Plan Amendment ("Limited Amendment") by the Montgomery County Planning Board ("Planning Board") to adjust certain approved setbacks for the multi-family residential building that is subject to Site Plan No. 820180220, as amended (the "Fairchild Apartments", or the "Project"), so that the approved building setbacks will be consistent with the configuration of the two new lots that the Minor Subdivision proposes within the Property. The Limited Amendment also proposes minor revisions to the previously approved layout of certain outdoor grills in the Project's courtyard to provide greater separation from the building. The Montgomery County Department of Permitting Services ("MCDPS") has recently informed the Applicant that the locations of the proposed grills should be adjusted in order to ensure compliance with applicable building and fire safety code requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps, Storm Drains, Paving Plans, 1952- 1959, 1-9-1 Alta Vista, Frank A
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY ARCHIVES MAP INDEX Abandoned Vehicle Lot (lots along Route 29, Columbia Pike), 1983, 4-3-18 Aberdeen Road, Bradley Hills, Assessment map, 1953, 1-6-11 Acacia Avenue, Maplewood, Assessment map, 1952, 1-4-12 Adelphi Road, New Hampshire Avenue to stream, 1960, 1961, 3-5-5 Albert Stewart Subdivision, Linden, Lyttonsville urban renewal project plans, 1984, 1-3-1 Allen Chapel Road, Dayton Street, Paving plans, storm drains, street dedication plat, 1959, 1960, 3-3-24 Allanwood, Flint Hill Road, Tierra Drive to Layhill Road, Plan and profile, 1964, 4-4-8 Allanwood Subdivision, Homewood, Marymount Proposed assessment, Graph, 1951, 1-6-3 Alley, Bonifant Street to Ripley Street, 1952, 1-3-16 Alley, Georgia Avenue to J.C. Penney, n.d., 1-6-2 Alta Vista, 1901, 1941, 1-5-12 Alta Vista, Benton Avenue, Paving and assessment plans, 1960, 1962, 3-5-24 Alta Vista, Chandler Street, Paving and assessment plans, 1960, 1962, 3-5-24 Alta Vista, Forest Road, Sewer extension, assessment maps, storm drains, paving plans, 1952- 1959, 1-9-1 Alta Vista, Frank A. Bock Tract, 1955-1956, 1-5-12 Alta Vista, Georgetown Village, Bells Mill Road and Democracy Boulevard, Water lowering, Plats and power distribution, 1961, 1-8-14 Alta Vista, Holland Avenue, Paving and assessment plans, 1960, 1962, 3-5-24 Alta Vista, Page Hill Subdivision, Beech Avenue to Linden, 1951, 1-5-12 Alta Vista, Page Hill Subdivision, Cantrell Lane, 1951, 1-5-12 Alta Vista, Page Hill Subdivision, Forest Road, 1951, 1-5-12 Alta Vista, Page Hill Subdivision, Maple Avenue, 1951, 1-5-12
    [Show full text]