DOCSLIB.ORG

ITEM 1 - Proposed Draft Revised Project Certificate No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ITEM 1 - Proposed Draft Revised Project Certificate No ITEM 1 - Proposed Draft Revised Project Certificate No. 005 Terms and Conditions (previously submitted to NIRB in January 2020) QIA-06, MHTO-02 January 25, 2021 RE: Draft Revised Project Certificate No. 005 for Phase 2 Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation (Baffinland) is pleased to provide the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) with its updated comments and suggested revisions to Project Certificate No. 005 for the Mary River Project (the Project). This document replaces the previous version of this document which was shared with NIRB in August 2019. The following approach was taken to outline suggested revisions to current terms and conditions where Baffinland has identified an opportunity to clarify the requirements of Project Certificate No. 005 or where the objectives of the term and condition have previously been met: 1. If a suggested revision to an existing term and conditions is proposed, a description of the associated revision has been provided. 2. Where any suggested revisions to remove a term and condition has been made, a rationale to support the recommended change has been provided. 3. Where appropriate, the proposed edits and or new terms and conditions also reflect commitments that were made by Baffinland to interveners to resolve or address certain technical issues during the NIRB Phase 2 reconsideration process. Draft Revised Project Certificate No. 005 for Phase 2 Project Certificate Condition No. 1 Baffinland Comments Category Meteorology and Climate Proposed Revision: Responsible Parties The Proponent Suggest to remove PC Condition No. 1. Project Phase(s) All phases Rationale: Objective To provide feedback on the impacts that climate change might be having on the port facilities. PC Condition No. 1 is duplicative of the requirements for PC Condition No. 83. See also suggested revisions to PC Term or Condition The Proponent shall use GPS monitoring or a similar means of monitoring at both Steensby Port and Milne Port, with Condition No. 2 that has been revised to address monitoring for effects of climate change on the Project and tidal gauges to monitor the relative sea levels and storm surges at these sites. Project infrastructure. Reporting Requirement The Proponent shall summarize and supply these monitoring results to NIRB in the annual project report. Stakeholder Review Marine Environmental Working Group (MEWG) Project Certificate Condition No. 2 Baffinland Comments Category Meteorology and Climate ‐ Climate Change Validation and Studies Proposed Revision: Responsible Parties The Proponent The Proponent shall develop a climate change strategy that may include the following: Project Phase(s) Construction, Operations, Temporary Closure / Care and Maintenance, Closure and Post‐Closure Monitoring conducting studies that identify Project risks as a result of climate change Objective To provide feedback on the impacts that climate change might be having on the Project. data collection or research that will assist in defining long‐term climate trends, such as: Term or Condition The Proponent shall provide the results of any new or revised assessments and studies done to validate and update Monitoring sea levels at Port climate change impact predictions for the Project and the effects of the Project on climate change in the Local Study Weather and temperature changes Area and Regional Study Area as defined in the Proponent’s Final Environmental Impact Statement. Permafrost stability Engagement with Inuit communities and other relevant stakeholders on climate change initiatives Investigation of initiatives that may be undertaken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions Rationale: Proposed revisions consolidate the requirements of PC Condition No. 2 ‐4 and provide a more comprehensive approach to climate change planning and monitoring and engagement with other stakeholders throughout the life of the Project. Reporting Requirement The Proponent shall provide new or revised assessments and studies to the NIRB, the affected communities, relevant regulatory authorities, and interested parties. Stakeholder Review Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) 2 Draft Revised Project Certificate No. 005 for Phase 2 Project Certificate Condition No. 3 Baffinland Comments Category Meteorology and Climate ‐ Green House Gas Emissions Proposed Revision: Responsible Parties The Proponent Suggest to remove PC Condition No. 3. Project Phase(s) Construction, Operations, Temporary Closure / Care and Maintenance, Closure and Post‐Closure Monitoring Objective To confirm that the Proponent is exploring and implementing concrete steps to reduce greenhouse gases. Rationale: Term or Condition The Proponent shall provide interested parties with evidence of continued initiatives undertaken to reduce greenhouse See proposed revisions to PC Condition No. 2. gas emissions. Reporting Requirement The Proponent shall include relevant information in the Annual Report submitted to the NIRB. Stakeholder Review Nunavut Inuit Review Board (NIRB) Project Certificate Condition No. 4 Baffinland Comments Category Climate Change ‐ Consultation on Climate Proposed Revision: Responsible Parties The Proponent Suggest to remove PC Condition No. 4. Project Phase(s) Construction, Operations, Temporary Closure / Care and Maintenance, Closure and Post‐Closure Monitoring Objective To promote public awareness and engagement of affected groups. Rationale: Term or Condition The Proponent shall endeavour to include the participation of Inuit from affected communities and other communities See proposed revisions to PC Condition No. 2. in Nunavut when undertaking climate‐change related studies and research. Reporting Requirement To be developed following approval of the Project by the Minister. Stakeholder Review Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) Project Certificate Condition No. 5 Baffinland Comments Category Meteorology and Climate ‐ Weather Monitoring Data No Change. Responsible Parties The Proponent Project Phase(s) Construction, Operations, Temporary Closure /Care and Maintenance, Closure and Post‐Closure Monitoring Objective To provide families of employees with up to date information. Term or Condition The Proponent shall endeavour to explore and implement reasonable measures to ensure that weather‐related information for the various Project sites is readily accessible to the public on a continual basis throughout the life of the Project. Reporting Requirement To be developed following approval of the Project by the Minister. Stakeholder Review N/A 3 Draft Revised Project Certificate No. 005 for Phase 2 Project Certificate Condition No. 6 Baffinland Comments Category Meteorology and Climate ‐ Emissions Proposed Revision: Responsible Parties The Proponent The Proponent shall provide the results of any emissions calculations conducted to determine the level of sulphur Project Phase(s) Construction, Operations, Temporary Closure / Care and Maintenance, Closure and Post‐Closure Monitoring dioxide (SO2) emissions, nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions and greenhouse gases generated by the Project using fuel Objective To provide feedback on the Project’s emissions. consumption or other relevant criteria as a basis. In cases where exceedances are manifested, the Proponent shall Term or Condition The Proponent shall provide the results of any emissions calculations conducted to determine the level of sulphur implement the adaptive management plan outlined in the Air Quality and Noise Abatement Management Plan. dioxide (SO2) emissions, nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions and greenhouse gases generated by the Project using fuel consumption or other relevant criteria as a basis. Rationale: Revised to minimize duplication with PC Conditions No. 8 and 9 and reflect the inclusion of a detailed adaptive management approach to air quality monitoring in the Air Quality and Noise Abatement Management Plan. Reporting Requirement To be included in the Annual Report submitted to the NIRB. Stakeholder Review N/A Project Certificate Condition No. 7 Baffinland Comments Category Air Quality ‐ Monitoring Proposed Revision: Responsible Parties The Proponent Suggest to remove PC Condition No. 7. Project Phase(s) Construction and Operations Objective To provide feedback on the Project’s emissions. Rationale: Term or Condition The Proponent shall update its Air Quality and Noise Abatement Management Plan to provide for continuous monitoring An updated Air Quality and Noise Abatement Management Plan was submitted as part of the Phase 2 FEIS at land‐based monitoring stations designed to capture operations phase ship‐generated SO2 and NO2 emissions at technical review process that includes continuous and active monitoring of SO2, NO2 and particulates. Steensby Port and Milne Port. Continuous monitoring is to be carried out through several shipping seasons at each port as required to determine that emissions are at acceptable levels. Reporting Requirement The updated plan shall be provided to the NIRB for review and comment at least 60 days prior to commencement of construction activities. Stakeholder Review N/A 4 Draft Revised Project Certificate No. 005 for Phase 2 Project Certificate Condition No. 8 Baffinland Comments Category Air Quality ‐ Greenhouse Gas Emissions Proposed Revision: Responsible Parties The Proponent Suggest to remove PC Condition No. 8. Project Phase(s) Construction and Operations Objective To provide feedback on the Project’s emissions. Rationale: Term or Condition The Proponent shall demonstrate through monitoring of air quality at the mine site and at the Steensby Inlet and Milne See
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Nunavut, Canada
    english cover 11/14/01 1:13 PM Page 1 FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove Principal Researchers: Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike FINAL REPORT OF THE INUIT BOWHEAD KNOWLEDGE STUDY NUNAVUT, CANADA By Inuit Study Participants from: Arctic Bay, Arviat, Cape Dorset, Chesterfield Inlet, Clyde River, Coral Harbour, Grise Fiord, Hall Beach, Igloolik, Iqaluit, Kimmirut, Kugaaruk, Pangnirtung, Pond Inlet, Qikiqtarjuaq, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut Wildlife Management Board Repulse Bay, and Whale Cove PO Box 1379 Principal Researchers: Iqaluit, Nunavut Keith Hay (Study Coordinator) and X0A 0H0 Members of the Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study Committee: David Aglukark (Chairperson), David Igutsaq, MARCH, 2000 Joannie Ikkidluak, Meeka Mike Cover photo: Glenn Williams/Ursus Illustration on cover, inside of cover, title page, dedication page, and used as a report motif: “Arvanniaqtut (Whale Hunters)”, sc 1986, Simeonie Kopapik, Cape Dorset Print Collection. ©Nunavut Wildlife Management Board March, 2000 Table of Contents I LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . .i II DEDICATION . .ii III ABSTRACT . .iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RATIONALE AND BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY . .1 1.2 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE . .1 2 METHODOLOGY 3 2.1 PLANNING AND DESIGN . .3 2.2 THE STUDY AREA . .4 2.3 INTERVIEW TECHNIQUES AND THE QUESTIONNAIRE . .4 2.4 METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS .
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Prof. David G. Barber, DP, FRSC, OC
    Curriculum Vitae Prof. David G. Barber, DP, FRSC, OC ............................................................................................................................................ Work history Canada Research Chair Tier I: Full Time (2008 -2022) Arctic System Science Associate Dean (Research): Full Time (2004 - present) Faculty of Environment Canada Research Chair Tier II: Full Time (2002 -2008) Arctic System Science Director, Centre for Earth Observation Science (CEOS): (1993 – 2013) Faculty of Environment, University of Manitoba, MB Full Professor: Full Time (1999 - present) University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Associate Professor: Full Time (1995 - 1999) University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Assistant Professor: Full Time (1993 - 1995) University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Research Manager, Global Change Program: Full Time (1992 - 1993) Earth Observations Lab, Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, ON Research Scientist, Marine Cryosphere Project: Full Time (1988 - 1992) Earth Observations Lab, Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, ON Contract Scientist, GIS and Remote Sensing Specialist: Part Time (1986 - 1989) Clients: Ice Centre, Environment Canada; Manitoba Natural Resources Department; Manitoba Hydro; Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, MB; Inland Waters Directorate, Environment Canada, Winnipeg, MB Contract Scientist, Arctic Fisheries and Marine Mammals: Part Time (1984 - 1986) Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, MB Research Technician, Arctic Fisheries Management: Full Time (1981 - 1984)
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004
    Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004 Institute of the North • U.S. Arctic Research Commission • International Arctic Science Committee Arctic Ocean Marine Routes This map is a general portrayal of the major Arctic marine routes shown from the perspective of Bering Strait looking northward. The official Northern Sea Route encompasses all routes across the Russian Arctic coastal seas from Kara Gate (at the southern tip of Novaya Zemlya) to Bering Strait. The Northwest Passage is the name given to the marine routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans along the northern coast of North America that span the straits and sounds of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Three historic polar voyages in the Central Arctic Ocean are indicated: the first surface shop voyage to the North Pole by the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Arktika in August 1977; the tourist voyage of the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Sovetsky Soyuz across the Arctic Ocean in August 1991; and, the historic scientific (Arctic) transect by the polar icebreakers Polar Sea (U.S.) and Louis S. St-Laurent (Canada) during July and August 1994. Shown is the ice edge for 16 September 2004 (near the minimum extent of Arctic sea ice for 2004) as determined by satellite passive microwave sensors. Noted are ice-free coastal seas along the entire Russian Arctic and a large, ice-free area that extends 300 nautical miles north of the Alaskan coast. The ice edge is also shown to have retreated to a position north of Svalbard. The front cover shows the summer minimum extent of Arctic sea ice on 16 September 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents
    NUNAVUT EXPERIENCES 2021 Table of Contents Arts & Culture Alianait Arts Festival Qaggiavuut! Toonik Tyme Festival Uasau Soap Nunavut Development Corporation Nunatta Sunakkutaangit Museum Malikkaat Carvings Nunavut Aqsarniit Hotel And Conference Centre Adventure Arctic Bay Adventures Adventure Canada Arctic Kingdom Bathurst Inlet Lodge Black Feather Eagle-Eye Tours The Great Canadian Travel Group Igloo Tourism & Outfitting Hakongak Outfitting Inukpak Outfitting North Winds Expeditions Parks Canada Arctic Wilderness Guiding and Outfitting Tikippugut Kool Runnings Quark Expeditions Nunavut Brewing Company Kivalliq Wildlife Adventures Inc. Illu B&B Eyos Expeditions Baffin Safari About Nunavut Airlines Canadian North Calm Air Travel Agents Far Horizons Anderson Vacations Top of the World Travel p uit O erat In ed Iᓇᓄᕗᑦ *denotes an n u q u ju Inuit operated nn tau ut Aula company About Nunavut Nunavut “Our Land” 2021 marks the 22nd anniversary of Nunavut becoming Canada’s newest territory. The word “Nunavut” means “Our Land” in Inuktut, the language of the Inuit, who represent 85 per cent of Nunavut’s resident’s. The creation of Nunavut as Canada’s third territory had its origins in a desire by Inuit got more say in their future. The first formal presentation of the idea – The Nunavut Proposal – was made to Ottawa in 1976. More than two decades later, in February 1999, Nunavut’s first 19 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) were elected to a five year term. Shortly after, those MLAs chose one of their own, lawyer Paul Okalik, to be the first Premier. The resulting government is a public one; all may vote - Inuit and non-Inuit, but the outcomes reflect Inuit values.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 5: Arctic Bay and Clyde River Site-Specific Marine Hunting Values Reported in the Study Area
    FINAL REPORT: QIA’S TUSAQTAVUT STUDY SPECIFIC TO BAFFINLAND’S PROPOSED PHASE 2 OF THE MARY RIVER PROJECT FOR THE COMMUNITIES OF ARCTIC BAY AND CLYDE RIVER Figure 5: Arctic Bay and Clyde River site-specific Marine Hunting values reported in the Study Area 37 FINAL REPORT: QIA’S TUSAQTAVUT STUDY SPECIFIC TO BAFFINLAND’S PROPOSED PHASE 2 OF THE MARY RIVER PROJECT FOR THE COMMUNITIES OF ARCTIC BAY AND CLYDE RIVER 4.2.2 Importance Marine Hunting encompasses a variety of species, bodies of knowledge, modes of travel, animal processing and food storage techniques (e.g., food caches), and harvesting locations and habitation sites. Study participants have used and continue to use the Study Area for Marine Hunting. The quotes below highlight some of their experiences hunting narwhal, walrus, and seal species in and around Milne Inlet, Eclipse Sound, Pond Inlet, and Baffin Bay. So, his family would also go narwhal hunting around Milne Inlet. … Yeah, that was a prime narwhal hunting area all that along here. … Yeah, that whole area. (C15 2020a, interpreted from Inuktitut) There was so much narwhal that you could hear them as soon as you wake up and they’d be there all day … They’re migrating but there’s so many of them that they would – it could take all day into the night, that’s how much narwhal there was … So they … would do all their narwhal hunting around that area [in Eclipse Sound]. (A01 2020, interpreted from Inuktitut) Plenty of seal hunting around Mount Herodier area. … And then, you know, he would also remember people catching narwhal really close to Pond Inlet when he was a child, but he can’t quite pinpoint what the year was.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic Gateway Group Is Owned by First Nations and Bayline Communities, Fairfax and Agt Foods, Building a Natural Resources
    THE ARCTIC GATEWAY GROUP IS OWNED BY FIRST NATIONS AND BAYLINE COMMUNITIES, FAIRFAX AND AGT FOODS, BUILDING A NATURAL RESOURCES GATEWAY THROUGH THE ARCTIC TO THE WORLD. Arctic Gateway Group LP Arctic_Gateway ArcticGateway 728 Bignell Ave. ArcticGateway The Pas, MB R9A 1L8 1-888-445-1112 [email protected] www.arcticgateway.com ABOUT THE GATEWAY The Arctic Gateway Group LP owns and operates the Port of Churchill, Canada’s only Arctic seaport serviced by rail, on the Hudson Bay Railway, running from The Pas to Churchill, Manitoba. Strategically located on the west coast of Hudson Bay, the Arctic Gateway is the front door to Western Canada, linking Canadian trade in resources to the global marketplace. The Arctic Gateway’s logistical advantage, rail assets and unique location provide direct and efficient routes to markets for Canada’s abundant natural resources and manufactured products, while connecting Canadian consumers and importers to the world marketplace via the North. Hudson Bay Railway (CN, KRC) port of The Hudson Bay Railway is made up of 627 miles port location interchange churchill hudson bay railroad (hbr) agg HBR operating of former Canadian National (CN) trackage, with a agg railroad agreement network that connects with CN in The Pas, running north through Manitoba to the Hudson Bay at the lynn lake kelsey gillam Port of Churchill. The Hudson Bay Railway is a vital transportation pukatawagan thompson link in northern Manitoba, hauling perishables, automobiles, frac ilford sherridon thicket Flin Flon sand, construction material, heavy and dimensional equipment, sherritt jct wabowden scrap, hazardous materials, kraft paper, concentrates, containers, Cranberry portage the pas the pas jct fertilizer, wheat and other grain products.
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem Overview
    i SUMMARY OF THE HUDSON BAY MARINE ECOSYSTEM OVERVIEW by D.B. STEWART and W.L. LOCKHART Arctic Biological Consultants Box 68, St. Norbert P.O. Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA R3V 1L5 for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans Central and Arctic Region, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 Draft March 2004 ii Preface: This report was prepared for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Central And Arctic Region, Winnipeg. MB. Don Cobb and Steve Newton were the Scientific Authorities. Correct citation: Stewart, D.B., and W.L. Lockhart. 2004. Summary of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem Overview. Prepared by Arctic Biological Consultants, Winnipeg, for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Winnipeg, MB. Draft vi + 66 p. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1 2.0 ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEW.........................................................................................................3 2.1 GEOLOGY .....................................................................................................................4 2.2 CLIMATE........................................................................................................................6 2.3 OCEANOGRAPHY .........................................................................................................8 2.4 PLANTS .......................................................................................................................13 2.5 INVERTEBRATES AND UROCHORDATES.................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Bay Ice Conditions
    Hudson Bay Ice Conditions ERIC W. DANIELSON, JR.l ABSTRACT.Monthly mean ice cover distributions for Hudson Bay have been derived, based upon an analysis of nine years of aerial reconnaissance and other data. Information is presented in map form, along with diseussian Of significant features. Ice break-up is seen to work southward from the western, northern, and eastern edges of the Bay; the pattern seems to be a result of local topography, cur- rents, and persistent winds. Final melting occurs in August. Freeze-up commences in October, along the northwestern shore, and proceeds southeastward. The entire Bay is ice-covered by early January,except for persistent shore leads. RÉSUMÉ. Conditions de la glace dans la mer d’Hudson. A partir de l’analyse de neuf années de reconnaissances aériennes et d’autres données, on a pu déduire des moyennes mensuelles de distribution de la glace pour la mer d’Hudson. L‘informa- tion est présentte sous formes de cartes et de discussion des Cléments significatifs. On y voit que la débâcle progresse vers le sud à partir des marges ouest, nord et est dela mer; cette séquence sembleêtre le résultat de la topographielocale, des courants et .des vents dominants. La fonte se termine en aofit. L’enge€wommence en octobre le long de la rive nord-ouest et progresse vers le sud-est. Sauf pow les chenaux côtiers persistants, la mer est entihrement gelée au début de janvier. INTRODUCTION In many respects, ice cover is a basic hydrometeorological variable. In Hudson Bay (Fig. 1) it might be considered the most basic of all, as it influences all other conditions so decisively.
    [Show full text]
  • “How Frigid Zones Reward the Advent‟Rers Toils”: Natural History Writing and the British Imagination in the Making of Hudson Bay, 1741-1752
    “How frigid Zones reward the Advent‟rers Toils”: Natural History Writing and the British Imagination in the Making of Hudson Bay, 1741-1752 by Nicholas Melchin B.A., Ottawa University, 2005 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History Nicholas Melchin, 2009 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-66809-2 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-66809-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Discovered the Northwest Passage? Janice Cavell1
    ARCTIC VOL. 71, NO.3 (SEPTEMBER 2018) P.292 – 308 https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4733 Who Discovered the Northwest Passage? Janice Cavell1 (Received 31 January 2018; accepted in revised form 1 May 2018) ABSTRACT. In 1855 a parliamentary committee concluded that Robert McClure deserved to be rewarded as the discoverer of a Northwest Passage. Since then, various writers have put forward rival claims on behalf of Sir John Franklin, John Rae, and Roald Amundsen. This article examines the process of 19th-century European exploration in the Arctic Archipelago, the definition of discovering a passage that prevailed at the time, and the arguments for and against the various contenders. It concludes that while no one explorer was “the” discoverer, McClure’s achievement deserves reconsideration. Key words: Northwest Passage; John Franklin; Robert McClure; John Rae; Roald Amundsen RÉSUMÉ. En 1855, un comité parlementaire a conclu que Robert McClure méritait de recevoir le titre de découvreur d’un passage du Nord-Ouest. Depuis lors, diverses personnes ont avancé des prétentions rivales à l’endroit de Sir John Franklin, de John Rae et de Roald Amundsen. Cet article se penche sur l’exploration européenne de l’archipel Arctique au XIXe siècle, sur la définition de la découverte d’un passage en vigueur à l’époque, de même que sur les arguments pour et contre les divers prétendants au titre. Nous concluons en affirmant que même si aucun des explorateurs n’a été « le » découvreur, les réalisations de Robert McClure méritent d’être considérées de nouveau. Mots clés : passage du Nord-Ouest; John Franklin; Robert McClure; John Rae; Roald Amundsen Traduit pour la revue Arctic par Nicole Giguère.
    [Show full text]