DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT Ecological Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT Ecological Impact Assessment DRAFT Ecological Impact Assessment EDENDALE QUARRY, R56, MATATIELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE. DRAFT ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared for: Prepared by: PORT ELIZABETH Also in Cape Town, East London, Johannesburg, Grahamstown, Maputo (Mozambique) and Romsey (UK) www.cesnet.co.za NOVEMBER 2020 REVISIONS TRACKING TABLE CES Report Revision and Tracking Schedule Document Title: Draft Ecological Impact Assessment Report for the proposed Edendale Quarry, R56, Matatiele Local Municipality, Eastern Cape Province. Client Name & The South African National Roads Agency SOC Limited (SANRAL) Address: Status: Draft Ecological Impact Assessment Issue Date: November 2020 Lead Author: Ms Nicole Wienand Reviewer: Ms Tarryn Martin Study Leader/ Registered Ms Robyn Thomson Environmental Assessment Dr Alan Carter Practitioner – Approval: No. of hard No. electronic Report Distribution Circulated to copies copies DEFF 0 One (1) Report Version DRAFT Ecological Impact Assessment This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of CES’s appointment and contains intellectual property and proprietary information that is protected by copyright in favour of CES. The document may therefore not be reproduced, used or distributed to any third party without the prior written consent of CES. This document is prepared exclusively for use by CES’s client. CES accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part), use or www.cesnet.co.za rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of CES. The document is subject to all confidentiality, copyright, trade secrets rules and intellectual property law and practices of South Africa. Ecological Impact Assessment Contact Details: Junior Botanical Specialist and Report Writer Name Ms Nicole Wienand Designation Junior Botanical Specialist, CES E-mail [email protected] Contact Details: Report Reviewer and Quality Control Name Ms Tarryn Martin Designation Principal Environmental Consultant E-mail [email protected] Contact Details: Project Manager Name Ms Robyn Thomson Designation Senior Environmental Consultant E-mail [email protected] Contact Details: EAP/Study Leader Name Dr Alan Carter Designation Executive and Principal Environmental Consultant E-mail [email protected] www.cesnet.co.za CES Environmental and Social Advisory Services EDENDALE QUARRY ii Ecological Impact Assessment Contents of the Specialist Report The contents of this specialist report complies with the legislated requirements as described in Appendix 6 of the National Environmental Management Act (No 107 of 1998; NEMA) Regulations of 2014 (as amended) (GN R. 326 of 2017). SPECIALIST REPORT REQUIREMENTS ACCORDING TO APPENDIX 6 SECTION OF GN R. 982 OF 2014, AS AMENDED IN GN R. 326 OF 2017 OF REPORT 1. A specialist report prepared in terms of these Regulations must contain— Chapter 1 (a) details of— and (i) the specialist who prepared the report; and Appendix E (ii) the expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae; (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be Section 1.2 specified by the competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report Chapter 2 was prepared; (cA) an indication of the quality and age of base data used for the Section 3.1 specialist report; (cB) a description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts Chapter 8 of the proposed development and levels of acceptable change; and Section 9.1 (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the Section 2.3 relevance of the season to the outcome of the assessment; and 3.1 (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out the specialised process inclusive of equipment and Chapter 3 modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the proposed activity or activities and its associated Chapter7 structures and infrastructure, inclusive of a site plan identifying site alternatives; (g) an identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers; Section 9.1.3 (h) a map superimposing the activity including the associated Chapter 5; structures and infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities of Chapter 7 the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; (i) a description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or Section 2.3 gaps in knowledge; (j) a description of the findings and potential implications of such Chapter 9 findings on the impact of the proposed activity or activities; (k) any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; Section 8.1 (l) any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation; and Section (m) any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or 9.2 environmental authorisation; (n) a reasoned opinion— (i) whether the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised; (iA) regarding the acceptability of the proposed activity or activities; and Section 9.3 (ii) if the opinion is that the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr, and where applicable, the closure plan; CES Environmental and Social Advisory Services EDENDALE QUARRY iii Ecological Impact Assessment (o) a description of any consultation process that was undertaken during the course of preparing the specialist report; (p) a summary and copies of any comments received during any Section 2.4 consultation process and where applicable all responses thereto; and (q) any other information requested by the competent authority. N/A (No other information has yet been requested) 2. (2) Where a government notice by the Minister provides for any protocol or minimum information requirement to be applied to a specialist report, the requirements as indicated in such notice will apply. * This report has been prepared in accordance with Appendix 6 of the NEMA EIA Regulations, and not the newly released Protocols for the Specialist Assessment and Minimum Report Content Requirements for Environmental Impacts on Terrestrial Plant and Animal Species (GN R. 1150) gazetted on the 30th October 2020, as the specialist assessment was commissioned prior to September 2020 (please refer to Appendix F for date of the commissioning of this specialist study). This report relates to November 2020. * CES Environmental and Social Advisory Services EDENDALE QUARRY iv Ecological Impact Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT TEAM ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Details and Expertise of the Specialists .............................................................. 1 1.2 Declaration ................................................................................................................. 1 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Project description and Location ............................................................................. 3 2.2 Site Sensitivity Verification and Minimum Report Content Requirements ..... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.3 Objectives and Terms of Reference ......................................................................... 4 2.4 Assumptions and limitations .................................................................................... 5 2.5 Public consultation.................................................................................................... 5 3. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................................................................... 7 3.1 The Assessment ........................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Species of conservation concern ............................................................................. 7 3.3 Sampling Protocol ..................................................................................................... 8 3.4 Vegetation Mapping................................................................................................... 8 3.5 Sensitivity Assessment ............................................................................................. 9 3.6 Ecological Impact assessment ............................................................................... 11 3.6.1 Impact rating methodology .............................................................................. 11 4. RELEVANT LEGISLATION ................................................................................. 12 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .................................. 16 5.1 Climate ..................................................................................................................... 16 5.2 Topography .............................................................................................................. 16 5.3 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................... 17 5.5 Land Cover ............................................................................................................... 19 5.6 Vegetation and Floristics ........................................................................................ 19 5.6.1 National - SANBI Classification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The
    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiporate Pollen and Apomixis in Panicoideae
    Pak. J. Bot., 41(5): 2073-2082, 2009. MULTIPORATE POLLEN AND APOMIXIS IN PANICOIDEAE MA GUOHUA1, 2*, HUANG XUELIN2, XU QIUSHENG1AND ERIC BUNN3 1South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China 2College of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China 3Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, WA 6005, Australia. Abstract Pollen in Panicoideae has usually single pore. However, it was observed with higher frequencies of multiporate pollen (2-6 pores) in 14 species or cytotypes out of 6 genera. The observations indicated that all species with multiporate pollen showed multiple ploidy levels and all apomicts occur among multiporate pollen and multi-ploidy level species. Our studies on embryo sac and embryo development show that species diploid Paspalum notatum without multiporate pollen was engaged in normal sexual reproduction and multiple-ploidy species (Paspalum distichium, P. commersonii, P. thunbergia and Bothriochloa ischaemum) were engaged in apomixis including apospory and diplospory. There was no evidence of apomixis occurring in Panicum repens which also exhibited multiporate pollen, however, all its embryo sacs were deteriorated. The authors suggest that the occurrence of multiporate pollen originate from abnormality in microsporogenesis and is representive of morbidity and multiporate pollen may have some internal relativity with apomixis. So the presence of multiporate pollen may be used as a preliminary identification of apomixis. Introduction The family Poaceae includes some of the most important cereal crops and also possesses the largest number of known apomictic species. Because the offspring of an apomict is genetically identical to its mother plant, it has potential for fixing hybrid vigour of crops (Asker & Jerling, 1992; Hanna et al., 1996; Vielle-Calzada et al., 1996; Bhat et al., 2005), especially Gramineae which includes main grain crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Notes on Asian Birds. 28
    ZV-340 179-190 | 28 04-01-2007 08:56 Pagina 179 Systematic notes on Asian birds. 28. Taxonomic comments on some south and south-east Asian members of the family Nectariniidae C.F. Mann Mann, C.F. Systematic notes on Asian birds. 28. Taxonomic comments on some south and south-east Asian members of the family Nectariniidae. Zool. Verh. Leiden 340, 27.xii.2002: 179-189.— ISSN 0024-1652/ISBN 90-73239-84-2. Clive F. Mann, 53 Sutton Lane South, London W4 3JR, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected]). Keywords: Asia; Nectariniidae; taxonomy. Certain taxonomic changes made by Cheke & Mann (2001) are here explained and justified. Dicaeum haematostictum Sharpe, 1876, is split from D. australe (Hermann, 1783). D. aeruginosum Bourns & Worcester, 1894 is merged into D. agile (Tickell, 1833). The genus Chalcoparia Cabanis, 1851, is re-estab- lished for (Motacilla) singalensis Gmelin, 1788. The taxon Leptocoma sperata marinduquensis (duPont, 1971), is shown to be based on a specimen of Aethopyga siparaja magnifica Sharpe, 1876. Aethopyga vigor- sii (Sykes, 1832) is split from A. siparaja (Raffles, 1822). Cheke & Mann (op. cit.) mistakenly omitted two forms, Anthreptes malacensis erixanthus Oberholser, 1932 and Arachnothera longirostra zarhina Ober- holser, 1912. Five subspecies are removed from Aethopyga shelleyi Sharpe, 1876 to create the polytypic A. bella, Tweeddale, 1877. The Arachnothera affinis (Horsfield, 1822)/modesta (Eyton, 1839)/everetti (Sharpe, 1893) complex is re-evaluated in the light of the revision by Davison in Smythies (1999). Introduction In a recent publication (Cheke & Mann, 2001) some taxonomic changes were made to members of this family occurring in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia: a Taste of Africa, November 2017
    Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 A Tropical Birding “Chilled” SET DEPARTURE tour The Gambia A Taste of Africa Just Six Hours Away From The UK November 2017 TOUR LEADERS: Alan Davies and Iain Campbell Report by Alan Davies Photos by Iain Campbell Egyptian Plover. The main target for most people on the tour www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] p.1 Tropical Birding - Trip Report The Gambia: A Taste of Africa, November 2017 Red-throated Bee-eaters We arrived in the capital of The Gambia, Banjul, early evening just as the light was fading. Our flight in from the UK was delayed so no time for any real birding on this first day of our “Chilled Birding Tour”. Our local guide Tijan and our ground crew met us at the airport. We piled into Tijan’s well used minibus as Little Swifts and Yellow-billed Kites flew above us. A short drive took us to our lovely small boutique hotel complete with pool and lovely private gardens, we were going to enjoy staying here. Having settled in we all met up for a pre-dinner drink in the warmth of an African evening. The food was delicious, and we chatted excitedly about the birds that lay ahead on this nine- day trip to The Gambia, the first time in West Africa for all our guests. At first light we were exploring the gardens of the hotel and enjoying the warmth after leaving the chilly UK behind. Both Red-eyed and Laughing Doves were easy to see and a flash of colour announced the arrival of our first Beautiful Sunbird, this tiny gem certainly lived up to its name! A bird flew in landing in a fig tree and again our jaws dropped, a Yellow-crowned Gonolek what a beauty! Shocking red below, black above with a daffodil yellow crown, we were loving Gambian birds already.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Frugivore Interactions in a Heterogeneous Forest Landscape of South Africa
    Plant-frugivore interactions in a heterogeneous forest landscape of South Africa Dissertation In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of a Doctorate Degree in Natural Sciences (Dr. rer. nat) The Faculty of Biology, Philipps-University of Marburg Lackson Chama, MSc Sinazongwe (Zambia) June 2012, Marburg From the Faculty of Biology, Philipps-University Marburg als Dissertation am angenommen. Dekan: Prof. Dr. Paul Galland Erstgutachterin: Prof. Dr. N. Farwig Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. R. Brandl Tag der Disputation: 25th June 2012 Dedicated to my son, Mishila, who’s first two years on earth I was hardly part of, due to my commitment towards this work. Contents CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3 EFFECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ON FOREST BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................................ 4 PLANT-FRUGIVORE INTERACTIONS IN CHANGING LANDSCAPES .................................................................................................. 5 THE ROLE OF FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY IN FRUGIVORE COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................... 5 EFFECTS OF SEED INGESTION BY FRUGIVOROUS BIRDS ON GERMINATION SUCCESS ........................................................................ 6 AIMS OF THE THESIS .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Diversity in Shendi Area, Sudan
    [Sulieman et. al., Vol.4 (Iss.6): June, 2016] ISSN- 2350-0530(O) ISSN- 2394-3629(P) IF: 4.321 (CosmosImpactFactor), 2.532 (I2OR) Science BIRD DIVERSITY IN SHENDI AREA, SUDAN Yassir Sulieman *1, Theerakamol Pengsakul 2, Azzam Afifi 3, Mohamed A. Zakaria 4 *1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Shendi, SUDAN 2 Faculty of Medical Technology, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, THAILAND 3 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Omdurman Islamic University, SUDAN 4 Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, University of Nyala, SUDAN DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i6.2016.2638 ABSTRACT The present study was conducted from July to December 2015 and found that the Shendi area, River Nile State, Sudan, Africa, hosts considerable bird diversity with 35 species being observed belonging to 22 families; of which Columbidae, Meropidae and Nectariniidae were the most frequently observed species. Keywords: Bird; Diversity; Shendi; Sudan. Cite This Article: Yassir Sulieman, Theerakamol Pengsakul, Azzam Afifi, and Mohamed A. Zakaria, “BIRD DIVERSITY IN SHENDI AREA, SUDAN” International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah, Vol. 4, No. 6 (2016): 55-63. 1. INTRODUCTION Birds are among the best known parts of the Earth’s biodiversity (Pomeroy, 1992; Bibby et al., 1998). They have long served humans for game, food, and feathers, as well as in their predatory capacity as destroyers of insects and rodents (Collins, 1981). In addition, they are considered as good indicators of the degree of human disturbance in the various ecosystems worldwide. Their population abundance has been found to change considerably due to anthropogenic activities (Askins et al., 1990; Bock et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • GHANA MEGA Rockfowl & Upper Guinea Specials Th St 29 November to 21 December 2011 (23 Days)
    GHANA MEGA Rockfowl & Upper Guinea Specials th st 29 November to 21 December 2011 (23 days) White-necked Rockfowl by Adam Riley Trip Report compiled by Tour Leader David Hoddinott RBT Ghana Mega Trip Report December 2011 2 Trip Summary Our record breaking trip total of 505 species in 23 days reflects the immense birding potential of this fabulous African nation. Whilst the focus of the tour was certainly the rich assemblage of Upper Guinea specialties, we did not neglect the interesting diversity of mammals. Participants were treated to an astonishing 9 Upper Guinea endemics and an array of near-endemics and rare, elusive, localized and stunning species. These included the secretive and rarely seen White-breasted Guineafowl, Ahanta Francolin, Hartlaub’s Duck, Black Stork, mantling Black Heron, Dwarf Bittern, Bat Hawk, Beaudouin’s Snake Eagle, Congo Serpent Eagle, the scarce Long-tailed Hawk, splendid Fox Kestrel, African Finfoot, Nkulengu Rail, African Crake, Forbes’s Plover, a vagrant American Golden Plover, the mesmerising Egyptian Plover, vagrant Buff-breasted Sandpiper, Four-banded Sandgrouse, Black-collared Lovebird, Great Blue Turaco, Black-throated Coucal, accipiter like Thick- billed and splendid Yellow-throated Cuckoos, Olive and Dusky Long-tailed Cuckoos (amongst 16 cuckoo species!), Fraser’s and Akun Eagle-Owls, Rufous Fishing Owl, Red-chested Owlet, Black- shouldered, Plain and Standard-winged Nightjars, Black Spinetail, Bates’s Swift, Narina Trogon, Blue-bellied Roller, Chocolate-backed and White-bellied Kingfishers, Blue-moustached,
    [Show full text]
  • SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
    SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK
    Technical Assistance Report Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK - Sapo National Park -Vision Statement By the year 2010, a fully restored biodiversity, and well-maintained, properly managed Sapo National Park, with increased public understanding and acceptance, and improved quality of life in communities surrounding the Park. A Cooperative Accomplishment of USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon- USDA Forest Service May 29, 2005 to June 17, 2005 - 1 - USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Protected Area Development Management Plan Development Technical Assistance Report Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon 17 June 2005 Goal Provide support to the FDA, CI and FFI to review and update the Sapo NP management plan, establish a management plan template, develop a program of activities for implementing the plan, and train FDA staff in developing future management plans. Summary Week 1 – Arrived in Monrovia on 29 May and met with Forestry Development Authority (FDA) staff and our two counterpart hosts, Theo Freeman and Morris Kamara, heads of the Wildlife Conservation and Protected Area Management and Protected Area Management respectively. We decided to concentrate on the immediate implementation needs for Sapo NP rather than a revision of existing management plan. The four of us, along with Tyler Christie of Conservation International (CI), worked in the CI office on the following topics: FDA Immediate
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Distribution of Faunal Diversity in Kafa Afromontane Coffee Forest
    Status and Distribution of Faunal Diversity in Kafa Afromontane Coffee Forest Leykun Abunie Berhan Submitted to PPP Project July 2008 Addis Ababa Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................4 Introduction..................................................................................................................................6 Literature Review Related to Faunal Diversity and Management...............................................8 Macro Policies and Priorities......................................................................................................8 Environmental Protection Policy.................................................................................................8 Wildlife Development / Management Policy................................................................................9 Analysis of Wildlife Sector in Ethiopia ......................................................................................10 Physical and Ecological Description of the Study Area ............................................................14 Objective of the Present Study...................................................................................................16 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................17 General Approach......................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Product: 594 - Pollens - Grasses, Bahia Grass Paspalum Notatum
    Product: 594 - Pollens - Grasses, Bahia Grass Paspalum notatum Manufacturers of this Product Antigen Laboratories, Inc. - Liberty, MO (Lic. No. 468, STN No. 102223) Greer Laboratories, Inc. - Lenoir, NC (Lic. No. 308, STN No. 101833) Hollister-Stier Labs, LLC - Spokane, WA (Lic. No. 1272, STN No. 103888) ALK-Abello Inc. - Port Washington, NY (Lic. No. 1256, STN No. 103753) Allermed Laboratories, Inc. - San Diego, CA (Lic. No. 467, STN No. 102211) Nelco Laboratories, Inc. - Deer Park, NY (Lic. No. 459, STN No. 102192) Allergy Laboratories, Inc. - Oklahoma City, OK (Lic. No. 103, STN No. 101376) Search Strategy PubMed: Grass Pollen Allergy, immunotherapy; Bahia grass antigens; Bahia grass Paspalum notatum pollen allergy Google: Bahia grass allergy; Bahia grass allergy adverse; Bahia grass allergen; Bahia grass allergen adverse; same search results performed for Paspalum notatum Nomenclature According to ITIS, the scientific name is Paspalum notatum. Common names are Bahia grass and bahiagrass. The scientific and common names are correct and current. Varieties are Paspalum notatum var. notatum and Paspalum notatum var. saurae. The Paspalum genus is found in the Poaceae family. Parent Product 594 - Pollens - Grasses, Bahia Grass Paspalum notatum Published Data Panel I report (pg. 3124) lists, within the tribe Paniceae, the genus Paspalum, with a common name of Dallis. On page 3149, one controlled study (reference 42: Thommen, A.A., "Asthma and Hayfever in theory and Practice, Part 3, Hayfever" Edited by Coca, A.F., M. Walzer and A.A. Thommen, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield IL, 1931) supported the effectiveness of Paspalum for diagnosis. Papers supporting that Bahia grass contains unique antigens that are allergenic (skin test positive) are PMIDs.
    [Show full text]