Consents and Regulatory Committee Agenda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Port Taranaki Industries Consent Monitoring Report
Port Taranaki Industries Monitoring Programme Annual Report 2016-2017 Technical Report 2017-105 Taranaki Regional Council ISSN: 1178-1467 (Online) Private Bag 713 Document: 1921869 (Word) STRATFORD Document: 1983005 (PDF) March 2018 Executive summary This report for the period July 2016 to June 2017 describes the monitoring programme implemented by the Taranaki Regional Council (the Council) to assess the environmental performance of the companies operating in and around Port Taranaki, New Plymouth. Port Taranaki Ltd operates Port Taranaki. Downer New Zealand Ltd and Technix Taranaki Terminal Ltd operate bitumen plants within the bounds of the port. Methanex New Zealand Ltd operates a methanol storage facility at the port, and New Zealand Oil Services Ltd provides terminal operation services involving the storage and distribution of fuel. The companies hold a total of eight resource consents, which include 60 conditions setting out the requirements that they must satisfy. The companies hold seven consents to discharge effluent/stormwater into the Tasman Sea, and one consent to discharge emissions into the air. In addition, Port Taranaki Ltd also holds a Certificate of Compliance with regards to air discharges. During the monitoring period, Port Taranaki demonstrated an overall good level of environmental performance. Downer New Zealand Ltd, Technix Taranaki Terminal Ltd, Methanex New Zealand Ltd and New Zealand Oil Services Ltd all demonstrated an overall high level of environmental performance compliance with the consents monitored under this annual report. The Council’s monitoring programme for the period under review included three site inspections of Port Taranaki Ltd, Downer New Zealand Ltd and Technix Taranaki Terminal Ltd, seven site inspections of Methanex New Zealand Ltd and four at New Zealand Oil Services Ltd. -
Taranaki Regional Land Transport Plan
REGIONAL Land Transport Plan FOR TARANAKI 2015/16 – 2020/21 June 2018 As revised by mid-term review for the 2018/19 – 2020/21 period 3 45 43 Taranaki Regional Council Regional Land Transport Plan for Taranaki 2015/16 – 2020/21 As revised by a 2018/19 – 2020/21 mid-term review Produced by: With assistance from: March 2015 As revised by mid-term review at June 2018 Word document #2072591-v1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents ..................................................................................... i Activities of inter-regional significance ........................................ 61 Foreword .............................................................................................. iii 6. Funding the RLTP .......................................................................... 62 1. Introduction to the plan .................................................................... 1 Proposed funding sources .......................................................... 62 Purpose and role ......................................................................... 1 The future without regionally dedicated funds ............................. 64 Area and period covered .............................................................. 1 Ten-year forecast of expenditure and revenue ............................. 65 Background and scope ................................................................. 2 National moderation and allocating of funding ........................... 67 Development process .................................................................. -
Draft Taranaki Regional Public Transport Plan 2020-2030
Draft Regional Public Transport Plan for Taranaki 2020/2030 Taranaki Regional Council Private Bag 713 Stratford Document No: 2470199 July 2020 Foreword (to be inserted) Table of contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Strategic context 2 2.1. Period of the Plan 4 3. Our current public transport system 5 4. Strategic case 8 5. Benefits of addressing the problems 11 6. Objectives, policies and actions 12 6.1. Network 12 6.2. Services 13 6.3. Service quality 14 6.4. Farebox recovery 17 6.5. Fares and ticketing 17 6.6. Process for establishing units 19 6.7. Procurement approach for units 20 6.8. Managing, monitoring and evaluating unit performance 22 6.9. Transport-disadvantaged 23 6.10. Accessibility 24 6.11. Infrastructure 25 6.12. Customer interface 26 7. Proposed strategic responses 28 Appendix A: Public transport services integral to the public transport network 31 Appendix B: Unit establishment 34 Appendix C: Farebox recovery policy 36 Appendix D: Significance policy 40 Appendix E: Land Transport Management Act 2003 requirements 42 1. Introduction The Taranaki Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP or the plan), prepared by Taranaki Regional Council (the Council), is a strategic document that sets out the objectives and policies for public transport in the region, and contains details of the public transport network and development plans for the next 10 years (2020-2030). Purpose This plan provides a means for the Council, public transport operators and other key stakeholders to work together in developing public transport services and infrastructure. It is an instrument for engaging with Taranaki residents on the design and operation of the public transport network. -
Long-Term Plan Hearing Agenda
Hearing on the 2021-2031 Long-Term Plan - Agenda Hearing on the 2021-2031 Long-Term Plan 10 May 2021 10:00 AM - 05:00 PM Agenda Topic Page Purpose of Meeting, Membership and Health and Safety 5 Apologies Notification of Late Items 1. Hearing of Submissions on the Consultation Document for the 2021/2031 Long-Term Plan 6 2. Officers Report on Submissions to the Long-Term Plan 9 3. Schedule of Submitters Wishing to Present their Submission 66 4. Long-Term Plan Submissions 68 4.1 Submission #1 - Nadine Ord 68 4.2 Submission #2 - Bruce Ellis 70 4.3 Submission #3 Karl-Heinz Zelt 72 4.4 Submission #4 - Steve Luscombe 74 4.5 Submission #5 - Julie Hagenson 76 4.6 Submission #6 - Paul Woodgate 78 4.7 Submission #7 - Robert Gordon 80 4.8 Submission #8 - Joanne Astwood 82 4.9 Submission #9 - Leith Astwood 83 4.10 Submission #10 - Mika Doron 84 4.11 Submission #11 - Kevin McCracken 87 4.12 Submission #12 - Vanessa Vujcich 89 4.13 Submission #13 - Megan Saxton 91 4.14 Submission #14 - Tammi Terblanche 92 4.15 Submission #15 - Trudy Adlam 94 1 Hearing on the 2021-2031 Long-Term Plan - Agenda 4.16 Submission #16 - Todd Lindsay 97 4.17 Submission #17 - Glenn McGregor 99 4.18 Submission #18 - James Rielly-Leadbetter 101 4.19 Submission #19 - M Hills 103 4.20 Submission #20 - Suzanne Pierce 105 4.21 Submission #21 - Dr Stuart Bramhall 107 4.22 Submission #22 - Peter Catt 110 4.23 Submission #23 - Abhijat Bhanot 112 4.24 Submission #24 - Venture Taranaki - Justine Gilliland 114 4.25 Submission #25 - Madison Davy 116 4.26 Submission #26 - Cat Burkitt 118 -
Tite NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. [No
1756 TitE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. [No. 62 MILITARY AREA No. 8 (NEW PLYMOUTH)-continued. MILITARY AREA No. 8 (XEW PLYMOUTH)-continued. 557549 Downey, George Henry, share-milker, care of H. J. Hall, 557583 Garrett, William Charles, timber-mill employee, Glover Rd., Kakaramea, Taranaki. Hawera.. 564039 Downs, Eric Oscar, dairy-farmer, P.O. Box 45, Waverley. 600681 Gartner, Herbert Henry, dairy-farmer, Mangawhero Rural 526250 Downs, Harold, nurseryman, Frankley Rd. Delivery, Riverlea. 545036 Doy, Arthur Leonard, salesman, 24 Glenahnond St. 526804 Gatenby, Francis William Henry, timber-worker, Derby St., 492421 Doyle, Harold Murchison, farm-manager, Waitotara. Eltham. 525475 Drabble, Harold Jackson, electrician, 3 Bridge St., Eltham. 599708 Gay, Leslie, dairy-farmer, Kawhai St., Manaia. 628227 Drake, Leonard, Rhop-aRsistant, J\Hro St., Inglewood. 566316 George, Harry Vernon, school-teacher, 10 Princes St. 498138 Dravitzki, Vincent Michael, farmer, Fmnkley Rd. 598266 George, Roy Henry, dairy-fanller, Egmont Village, Ingle- 528684 Drayton, Leslie Travis, farmer, Will\On Rd., Kakaramea. wood. 558903 Drinkwater, Walter John, farmer, Rural Delivery, Waito- 467391 Gernhoefer, Ronald Louis, cheesemaker, High St., Eltham. tara. 579680 Gibbons, Ashley, farmer, Beaconsfield Road Rural Delivery, 526618 Dryden, Douglas, sheep-farmer, Omahina, Waverley. Stratford. 591078 Du Fresne, Eric Peter, substation operator, Ohangai Rd. 603342 Gibbs, Henry Owen, farmer, Flint Rd., Stratford. Hawera. 541942 Gibson, Arnold Tracey, school-teacher, Brassey St., Waverley. 626370 Duggan, Connell Colin, farm hand, Okaiawa Rural Delivery, 489581 Giddy, Newton Howe, share-milker, Kelly Rd., Lepperton. Hawera. 569143 Gilberd, Ronald George, stoker, 30 Clemow Rd. 584668 Dulieu, Horace, horse trainer, 135 Avenue Rd. 569147 Gilbert, Rayon Clare, labourer, Okoke. 526603 Duncan, Alan Gordon, supervising foreman, 4 Wallath Rd. -
·R E ' Haumoana
·r e ' Haumoana I .' ) ;,. • THE MAGAZINE OF THE OPUNAKE HIGH SCHOOL VOL. 14 1969 OPUNAKE HIGH SCHOOL MAGAZINE • CONTENTS Digitized by Aotearoa Archives Trust http://nzarchives.com I School Officers 2 Editorial 3 Staff Notes . 5 Prefects' Notes 6 Original Prose and Verse . 9 Academic Record 26 Sports' Notes 30 School Institutions and Activities 44 School List .. 53 Page One OPUNAKE HIGH SCHOOL CONTROLLING AUTHORITY. TARANAKI .EDUCATION BOARD. editorial COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT: Chairman: A school is not unlike a 13th Century feudal state with Mr. F. R. RIDDELL (representing Rahotu, Pungarehu, Oaonui). its gradations of power from the sovereign to the Deputy Chairman: humblest serf. Whatever the attitude of the ba rons, Mr. T. F. C. DAVIS (representing .Egmont County Council). whatever the inclinations of the villeins, the theory of Members: a state with an absolute king at its head was never allowed to lapse. So it is with a school. The Rev. Father J. J. KAVANAGH (representing Opunake Convent). Principal, is both titular and proctlccl in his control of Messrs. R. J. DUFF and L. J. WELSH (representing Auroa, Otakeho, Pihama, those beneath him. Oeo). Messrs. E. WYATT and J. A MACKIE (representing Kaponga, Te Kiri, A wise king handled his barons firmly, justly, with kindly understanding, Riverlea, Makaka, Awatuna, Kaponga Convent.) and because of this his reign proved beneficial and advantageous to the subjects Messrs. C. MOURIE and B. OCKHUYSEN (representing Opunake). whu constituted his state. It is no different in the case of a pr incipcl whose Mr. R. K. FENTON (representing Rahotu, Pungarehu, Oaonui). realm consists of degrees of high and low, the ultimate welfare of which lies in his hands. -
New Plymouth Ports Guide
PORT GUIDE Last updated: 24th September 2015 FISYS id : PO5702 UNCTAD Locode : NZ NPL New Plymouth, NEW ZEALAND Lat : 39° 03’ S Long : 174° 02’E Time Zone: GMT. +12 Summer time kept as per NZ regulations Max Draught: 12.5m subject to tide Alternative Port Name: Port Taranaki Vessels facilities [ x ] Multi-purpose [ x ] Break-bulk [ x ] Pure container [ x ] Dry bulk [ x ] Liquid (petro-chem) [ x ] Gas [ x ] Ro-ro [ x ] Passenger/cruise Authority/Co name: Port Taranaki Ltd Address : Port Taranaki Ltd PO Box 348 New Plymouth North Island New Zealand Telephone : +64 6 751 0200 Fax : +64 6 751 0886 Email: [email protected] Key Personnel Position Email Guy Roper Chief Executive [email protected] Capt Neil Marine Services Manager / [email protected] Armitage Harbour Master 1 SECTION CONTENTS Page 2.0 Port Description 2.1 Location. 3 2.2 General Overview. 3 2.3 Maximum Size 3 3.0 Pre Arrival Information. 3.1 ETA’s 4 3.2 Documentation. 4 3.3 Radio. 5 3.4 Health. 5 3.5 Customs and Immigration. 5 3.6 Standard Messages. 7 3.7 Flags. 7 3.8 Regulations and General Notices. 7 3.9 Agencies 9 4.0 Navigation. 4.1 Port Limits. 9 4.2 Sea buoys, Fairways and Channels. 9 4.3 Pilot. 9 4.4 Anchorage’s. 10 4.5 Tides. 10 4.6 Dock Density. 10 4.7 Weather 10 4.8 VHF. 11 4.9 Navigation 11 4.10 Charts and Publications. 13 4.11 Traffic Schemes. 13 4.12 Restrictions. -
2015 the Guide to Member Gardens of the New Zealand Gardens Trust “Your Guarantee of Quality Private and Public Gardens to Visit”
Garden NEW ZEALAND GARDENS TRUST GUIDE 2015 The guide to member gardens of the New Zealand Gardens Trust “Your guarantee of quality private and public gardens to visit” HIS guide offers visitors a chance to see over 100 of NZ’s best gardens. Come and discover a variety of garden styles, from subtropical experiences Tor traditional homestead gardens to inventive native flora creations, all with a fresh approach to garden tradition. Both public and private they are rated from three to six stars and assessed regularly to ensure high standards. This guide presents you with a short summary of the gardens. For more information about their special character or for ideas on planning a garden-visiting itinerary, go to our website at: www.gardens.org.nz Or contact: Irene Collins, Administrative Manager, NZ Gardens Trust PO Box 87397, Meadowbank, Auckland 1742 Ph: 027 694 8778. Email: [email protected] Note: Our private gardens would appreciate a call prior to visiting their garden. Ngahuha êêêê AUCKLAND NORTH ISLAND Address 121 Smith Rd, Pakaraka Contact Ph: 09 404 1020 or 021 460 277 A’ La Fois Gardens êêêê NORTHLAND [email protected], www.ngahuha.cc.nz Address 31 Coatesville Heights, RD3 , Albany 0793 Cost Adults: $10 Contact Ph: 09 414 4324 [email protected] Butler Point êêêê Open by arrangement summer/spring - Cost Adults: $10 Children: Free Address 31 Marchant Road, Hihi, Mangonui please call prior to visiting Open by arrangement all year 9am-6pm Contact Ph: 09 406 0006, [email protected] www.butlerpoint.co.nz Pompallier Mission -
Lepperton Cemetery
6.4 Lepperton Cemetery Description Location: Cross Street off Richmond Road, Lepperton Legal description: Section 2 - 3, Town of Lepperton Size: 0.4 hectares Reserve status: Subject to Reserves Act 1977 Reserve classification: Request with the Department of Conservation to classify as Local purpose (cemetery) reserve Section 2 Richmond Road Section 3 Cross Street Physical description The cemetery is situated on flat land and accessed from Cross Street. There is a white picket fence and ornamental trees along the street frontage. Shelter belts and hedging exists along the other boundaries of the cemetery. The western shelter belt is encroaching on some of the memorials. The cemetery consists of established family plots and is nearing capacity. Tangata whenua interests This reserve is within the tribal rohe of Te Atiawa Iwi. It is of historic and cultural significance to Pukerangiora hapu. Land status and acquisition history In 1881, James Prendegast the Chief Justice of the Colony of New Zealand, pursuant to ‘The Special Powers and Contracts Act 1881’, changed the purpose of the following reserve from educational to public cemetery; Sections 2 and 3 on the map of Manutahi Township (North) Paritutu Survey District. This was recorded in a gazette notice dated October 1881 (page 1308). Note Manutahi Township is now named Lepperton Township. Parks Cemeteries Management Plan New Plymouth District Council August 2012 Governor Onslow in 1890, pursuant to Section 227 of ‘The Lands Act 1885’ declared Sections 2 and 3 Town of Manutahi as a reserve for the purpose of a cemetery. This is recorded in a Gazette notice published in September 1890 (page 1064)1. -
The Issue Business We Are Reporting
To: Commerce Commission New Zealand From: Climate Justice Taranaki Incorporated Re: Complaint on Revital Group / Remediation NZ Date: 11 March 2019 The issue Business we are reporting Revital Group / Remediation NZ Location of business 208 de Havilland Drive, Bell Block New Plymouth Our concerns We believe Revital Group may have breached the Fair Trading Act by misleading the public as to the nature, manufacturing process and characteristics of its fertilizer products. We are especially concerned about Revital’s range of compost and vermicast products made in Taranaki where petroleum drilling and production wastes have been incorporated into the manufacturing processes. We question the robustness of the product testing and traceability regimes and believe there is potential of harm to the public. Misleading information Revital Group’s website emphasizes the organic nature of its products but fails to mention the use of inorganic materials in their production and the possibility of inorganic residues in the products. e.g. The company’s mission is “To transform organic resources into valuable, marketable products through composting, vermiculture and quarrying, supported with quality service and innovation” and “All Revital sites are audited annually by BioGro NZ…” http://revital.co.nz/revital-group/about/ e.g. “Our Grow-all combines the power of nutrient – rich vermicast (worm castings) and high quality organic compost and is the all-natural, rich source of biological life for your soil!” http://revital.co.nz/project/grow- all/ e.g. “Our worm farms are located around the North Island of New Zealand, close to our organic composting sites where we can mix organic compost and vermicast together, for the best ‘brew’ available!.. -
TSB COMMUNITY TRUST REPORT 2016 SPREAD FINAL.Indd
ANNUAL REPORT 2016 CHAIR’S REPORT Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa Greetings, greetings, greetings to you all The past 12 months have been highly ac ve for the Trust, As part of the Trust’s evolu on, on 1 April 2015, a new Group marked by signifi cant strategic developments, opera onal asset structure was introduced, to sustain and grow the improvements, and the strengthening of our asset base. Trust’s assets for future genera ons. This provides the Trust All laying stronger founda ons to support the success of with a diversifi ca on of assets, and in future years, access to Taranaki, now and in the future. greater dividends. This year the Trust adopted a new Strategic Overview, As well as all this strategic ac vity this year we have including a new Vision: con nued our community funding and investment, and To be a champion of posi ve opportuni es and an agent of have made a strong commitment to the success of Taranaki benefi cial change for Taranaki and its people now and in communi es, with $8,672,374 paid out towards a broad the future range of ac vi es, with a further $2,640,143 commi ed and yet to be paid. Our new Vision will guide the Trust as we ac vely work with others to champion posi ve opportuni es and benefi cial Since 1988 the Trust has contributed over $107.9 million change in the region. Moving forward the Trust’s strategic dollars, a level of funding possible due to the con nued priority will be Child and Youth Wellbeing, with a focus on success of the TSB Bank Ltd. -
On the Trail of the Last Samurai (II) : Hobbiton Vs Uruti Valley
Title On the trail of The Last Samurai (II) : Hobbiton vs Uruti Valley Author(s) Seaton, Philip Citation International Journal of Contents Tourism, 4, 25-31 Issue Date 2019-03-19 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/73106 Type bulletin (article) File Information IJCT-Vol-4-Seaton-2019b.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP On the trail of The Last Samurai (II): Hobbiton vs Uruti Valley Philip Seaton Abstract: This research note is part two of a three-part series documenting fieldwork at sites related to the 2003 film The Last Samurai. The ‘failure’ of Last Samurai tourism at shooting locations in Taranaki has often been contrasted with the success of tourism in New Zealand relating to Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit. Based on fieldwork at Hobbiton in August 2017, this research note identifies the main reasons why Hobbiton became a popular tourist attraction with up to 3000 visitors per day in 2016-2017, while by the same time Last Samurai tourism had effectively ceased to exist. The reasons for Hobbiton’s ‘success’, by contrast, are identified as a reason why Last Samurai sites might remain attractive for film tourists, while Hobbiton has lost much of its appeal for film tourism purists. アブストラクト:本研究ノートは、2003年公開の映画『ラストサムライ』に関連する場 所でのフィールドワーク記録を、3編の連続する研究ノートとしてまとめたうちの「その 2」である。『ラストサムライ』のロケ地であるタラナキにおける『ラストサムライ』ツー リズムの「失敗」事例は、しばしば、同じくニュージーランドの事例である『ロード・ オブ・ザ・リング』と『ホビット』に関連するツーリズムの「成功」と比較される。本 研究ノートでは、2017年8月に実施したホビトンでの現地調査に基づき、『ラストサム ライ』関連のツーリズムが明らかに下火になってしまった一方で、ホビトンが、2016年 から2017年現在も、1日当たり最大3千人訪問する人気のツーリストアトラクションにな り得ているのは何故なのか、その主たる理由について検討を行う。その一方で、ホビト ンの「成功」理由は、フィルムツーリズム上の魅力の多くを失ったことが逆に作用した 点にあり、この点において、『ラストサムライ』ロケ地は依然としてフィルムツーリスト に対して魅力を維持し続けている可能性があることについても論じる。 Keywords: film tourism, contents tourism, The Last Samurai, Lord of the Rings, Hobbiton.