A Study of Environmental Peacebuilding in Israel and Palestine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Study of Environmental Peacebuilding in Israel and Palestine Good Water Neighbors? A Study of Environmental Peacebuilding in Israel and Palestine by Inga Schierholz A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Peace and Conflict Studies University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2018 by Inga Schierholz Copyright © 2018 by Inga Schierholz A drawing on the wall at Sharhabil Bin Hassneh EcoPark, Jordan. Source: Personal image. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research project would not have been possible without the support and guidance from a great variety of people, including first and foremost my advisor, Dr. Dean Peachey, who has been a tremendous mentor and an unrelenting source of encouragement; Drs. Sean Byrne, Shirley Thompson, and Tami Jacoby, who have helped steer this thesis towards completion; the staff of EcoPeace Middle East, who never hesitated to offer their help and expertise throughout and beyond my internship; the many members of the organization, who graciously lent me their time and wisdom to form the heart of this thesis; my husband, Dayner, who has always been at my side and enabled me to carry on even during the most difficult times of this endeavor; my family, who has been supportive and loving even from a great distance; and my friends, far and near, who have been there for me when I needed to find inspiration, distraction, or just an open ear. I also wish to thank those that have generously supported this project financially, among them the Arthur V. Mauro Centre; St. Paul’s College; the Department of Political Studies; the Faculty of Environment, Earth, and Resources; and the Faculty of Graduate Studies at the University of Manitoba; the University of Winnipeg and the Province of Manitoba; as well as Canadian Friends of Hebrew University, Winnipeg. i ii ABSTRACT Water scarcity, pollution, and unequal distribution add complexity to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In response, EcoPeace Middle East engages Israelis, Palestinians, and Jordanians in cross-border environmental cooperation while promoting dialogue and trust among members of all three societies. This study explores how EcoPeace fosters environmental peacebuilding between Israel and Palestine, looking specifically at what motivates Israelis and Palestinians to engage in cross-border cooperation, how their involvement in the organization affects their relationships, and the organization’s key challenges and strengths. The study relies on theories of water conflict and water cooperation, social cubism, and environmental and multi-track peacebuilding. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and critical auto-ethnography. The study found that by creating linkages between water and other sectors of society, the organization has been able to procure tangible results, and sustain limited dialogue and cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians, even in the context of physical, legal, political, and psychological barriers. iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II. CONTEXT 7 2.1 THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT 7 2.2 THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN WATER CONFLICT 10 2.3 WATER AND THE PEACE PROCESS 16 2.4 ECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST 18 CHAPTER III. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 23 3.1 THEORIES OF WATER CONFLICT AND COOPERATION 24 3.1.1 WATER CONFLICT 24 3.1.2 WATER COOPERATION 28 3.2 SOCIAL CUBISM AND THE WATER CONFLICT 31 3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL PEACEBUILDING AND THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY 38 3.3.1 PEACEBUILDING 38 3.3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE 40 3.3.3 THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY 41 3.4 SUMMARY OF THE MAIN THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 46 4.1 PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION 49 4.2 CRITICAL ETHNOGRAPHY 50 4.3 SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS WITH STAFF MEMBERS AND BENEFICIARIES 50 4.4 DATA COLLECTION AND HANDLING 52 4.5 DATA ANALYSIS 53 4.6 ORIENTATION OF THE RESEARCHER 54 4.7 ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE 55 4.8 LIMITATIONS OF STUDY 55 v CHAPTER V. FINDINGS 57 5.1 THREE AREAS, ONE WALL, AND PARALLEL LAWS 57 5.1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL BARRIERS 59 5.1.2 LEGAL BARRIERS 66 5.1.3 CASE STUDY #1: CLEANING THE HEBRON-HABESOR-GAZA BASIN 68 5.2 MOTIVATIONS FOR COOPERATION 75 5.2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND POLITICAL STABILITY 76 5.2.2 WATER RIGHTS 82 5.2.3 CASE STUDY #2: STOPPING THE WALL IN BATTIR 87 5.3 ECONOMIC, ENERGY, AND TOURISM INCENTIVES 93 5.3.1 THE WATER-ENERGY-NEXUS (WEN) 93 5.3.2 ECONOMIC AND TOURISM OPPORTUNITIES 95 5.3.3 A DREAM FOR A PEACE ISLAND 98 5.4 ECOPEACE’S EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES 100 5.4.1 SCHOOL-BASED ACTIVITIES 101 5.4.2 FAITH-BASED ACTIVITIES 105 5.4.3 CASE STUDY #3: ECOPARK ALUMNI CAMP 106 5.5 ROADBLOCKS TO COOPERATION 121 5.5.1 ANTI-NORMALIZATION, ANTI-COOPERATION 121 5.5.2 ISRAELI SETTLEMENTS 128 CHAPTER VI. DISCUSSION 141 6.1 THE GENIUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PEACEBUILDING 141 6.2 MOTIVATIONS FOR COOPERATION 143 6.3 THE RIGHT TO WATER 144 6.4 IN-GROUP SOCIALIZATION 151 6.5 INTERGROUP SOCIAL COHESION 154 6.6 CHALLENGES: ISRAELI SETTLEMENTS 160 6.7 SUMMARY 162 6.8 FUTURE RESEARCH 163 vi CHAPTER VII. EPILOGUE 165 VIII. REFERENCES 169 IX. APPENDICES 183 10.1 APPENDIX I – INTERVIEW GUIDING QUESTIONS FOR ECOPEACE STAFF MEMBERS 183 10.2 APPENDIX II – INTERVIEW GUIDING QUESTIONS FOR ECOPEACE BENEFICIARIES 184 10.3 APPENDIX III – CONSENT FORM ECOPEACE STAFF MEMBERS 185 10.4 APPENDIX IV – CONSENT FORM ECOPEACE BENEFICIARIES 189 10.5 APPENDIX V – CONSENT FORM ECOPEACE BENEFICIARIES FOCUS GROUP 195 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: THE SIX FORCES OF THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN (WATER) CONFLICT 37 TABLE 2: FUNCTIONS OF ECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST AS A CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION 42 TABLE 3: SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS 52 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: ISRAEL, PALESTINE, AND ITS NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES 8 FIGURE 2: THE SIX FORCES OF ETHNO-TERRITORIAL CONFLICTS 33 FIGURE 3: LEDERACH’S PYRAMID OF PEACEBUILDING 44 FIGURE 4: ECOPEACE’S FIVE-YEAR STRATEGY 2017-2021 45 FIGURE 5: SHARED WATERSHEDS OF ISRAEL, PALESTINE, AND JORDAN 63 FIGURE 6: THE JORDAN RIVER PEACE PARK 99 FIGURE 7: SOURCES OF POLLUTION IN THE WEST BANK 136 vii viii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION More than two-thirds of our “Blue Planet” is covered by water, yet only a miniscule amount of it is accessible to humans and is suitable for drinking without prior treatment. Water, the substance of all life on earth, is abundant in some places and scarce in others. The Middle East and North African (MENA) region is one of the most water-stressed regions in the world. Approximately five percent of the world’s population have access to only one percent of earth’s freshwater resources. The region’s rivers, most of which are transboundary, provide two thirds of its freshwater supply, making it the highest rate of dependency on international basins in the world.1 Today, the total water demand in the MENA already exceeds naturally available water supplies by almost 20 percent.2 Several factors are putting this valuable source of humanity at additional risk. Our rapidly growing population exacts ever greater amounts of water; unsustainable environmental practices are polluting and overexploiting resources; and competition among water users is causing uneven resource distribution. Situated in the heart of the MENA, Israel and Palestine face issues of prolonged drought, pollution, and unequal distribution of water resources. Within this ecological context, the Israeli- Palestinian conflict adds an additional layer of complexity. Even though the conflict does not emanate from an ecological cause – its core revolves around one piece of land that is culturally, spiritually, and historically significant to two peoples – issues of water quantity and quality have long been a major area of contention between both peoples and continue to shape the dynamics of the conflict. 1 See The World Bank, “Making the most of scarcity: Accountability for better water management in the Middle East and North Africa” (report by The World Bank, Washington, 2007), 8. 2 See The World Bank, “The Grain Chain: Food Security and Managing Wheat Imports in Arab Countries” (report by The World Bank, 2012), as cited in Oded Eran, Gidon Bromberg, and Giulia Giordano, “Israeli Water Diplomacy and National Security Concerns” (EcoPeace Middle East and INSS, January 2018), 5. 1 The availability and control of water resources is imperative for the survival, sustenance, and development of Israel and Palestine. For a long time, scholars and politicians considered the issues of water quantity and quality a question of technological innovation, separate from the political conflict and answered primarily by engineers and scientists. Yet because the physical world of water is closely connected to the socio-political world, especially in contexts of protracted, ethnoterritorial conflicts like that between Israel and Palestine, water is entangled in a web of complex linkages of politics, power, and the overall sociopsychological characteristics of the conflict. In Israel and Palestine, issues of water, sanitation, and related environmental concerns have been a source of both conflict and cooperation. In the absence of a fair and effective water agreement between Israel and Palestine, both parties continue to vie over the resource in what they believe to be a zero-sum game. At the same time, growing awareness about the unsustainability of the current system has prompted regional civil society actors to take matters into their own hands. Realizing that a continuation of the status quo is bound to bring harm to all people of the region, environmentalists, peace practitioners, and concerned citizens have come together to promote fair and sustainable environmental practices to protect their shared resources. EcoPeace Middle East is one such example. As a non-governmental environmental organization, EcoPeace brings together Israelis, Palestinians, and Jordanians to promote cooperative efforts for protecting and rehabilitating transboundary resources and the shared environmental heritage of the Levant.
Recommended publications
  • The Legends of Genesis
    THE LEGENDS OF GENESIS. BY H. GUNKEL. THE SIGNIFICANCE AND SCOPE OF THE LEGENDS. ARE the narratives of Genesis history or legend? For the mod- Ix. ern historian this is no longer an open question ; neverthe- less it is important to get a clear notion of the bases of this modern position. The writing of history is not an innate endowment of the hu- man mind ; it arose in the course of human history and at a definite stage of development. Uncivilised races do not write history; they are incapable of reproducing their experiences objectively, and have no interest in leaving to posterity an authentic account of the events of their time. Experiences fade before they are fairly cold, and fact and fancy mingle ; only in poetical form, in song and saga, are unlettered tribes able to report historical occurrences. Only at a certain stage of civilisation has objectivity so grown and the interest in transmitting national experiences to posterity so in- creased that the writing of history becomes possible. Such history has for its subjects great public events, the deeds of popular lead- ers and kings, and especially wars. Accordingly some sort of po- litical organisation is an antecedent presumption to the writing of history. Only in a later, in the main a much later, time is the art of writing history, learned through the practice of writing national histories, applied to other spheres of human life, whence we have memoirs and the histories of families. But considerable sections of the people have never risen to the appreciation of history proper, IThe present treatise is the Introduction to the same author's Comnu-niary on Genesis (\'an- (ienboek & Ruprecht, Giittingen), in which the positions here taken are expounded and supported in greater detail.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2014 Al-Malih Shaqed Kh
    Salem Zabubah Ram-Onn Rummanah The West Bank Ta'nak Ga-Taybah Um al-Fahm Jalameh / Mqeibleh G Silat 'Arabunah Settlements and the Separation Barrier al-Harithiya al-Jalameh 'Anin a-Sa'aidah Bet She'an 'Arrana G 66 Deir Ghazala Faqqu'a Kh. Suruj 6 kh. Abu 'Anqar G Um a-Rihan al-Yamun ! Dahiyat Sabah Hinnanit al-Kheir Kh. 'Abdallah Dhaher Shahak I.Z Kfar Dan Mashru' Beit Qad Barghasha al-Yunis G November 2014 al-Malih Shaqed Kh. a-Sheikh al-'Araqah Barta'ah Sa'eed Tura / Dhaher al-Jamilat Um Qabub Turah al-Malih Beit Qad a-Sharqiyah Rehan al-Gharbiyah al-Hashimiyah Turah Arab al-Hamdun Kh. al-Muntar a-Sharqiyah Jenin a-Sharqiyah Nazlat a-Tarem Jalbun Kh. al-Muntar Kh. Mas'ud a-Sheikh Jenin R.C. A'ba al-Gharbiyah Um Dar Zeid Kafr Qud 'Wadi a-Dabi Deir Abu Da'if al-Khuljan Birqin Lebanon Dhaher G G Zabdah לבנון al-'Abed Zabdah/ QeiqisU Ya'bad G Akkabah Barta'ah/ Arab a-Suweitat The Rihan Kufeirit רמת Golan n 60 הגולן Heights Hadera Qaffin Kh. Sab'ein Um a-Tut n Imreihah Ya'bad/ a-Shuhada a a G e Mevo Dotan (Ganzour) n Maoz Zvi ! Jalqamus a Baka al-Gharbiyah r Hermesh Bir al-Basha al-Mutilla r e Mevo Dotan al-Mughayir e t GNazlat 'Isa Tannin i a-Nazlah G d Baqah al-Hafira e The a-Sharqiya Baka al-Gharbiyah/ a-Sharqiyah M n a-Nazlah Araba Nazlat ‘Isa Nazlat Qabatiya הגדה Westהמערבית e al-Wusta Kh.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Praying for Judgment of the Canaanites
    Abraham Praying For Judgment Of The Canaanites Romantic Matthaeus herd, his Aries hoot gleans misguidedly. Overfond and encomiastic Zeus litters while coccal Thurstan commix her subtexts negatively and neighs imperfectly. Leggier Aubert stabilise his citterns disinherit tumultuously. They would continue the canaanites for abraham praying of the judgment against you are destroyed for the hittite suzerainty treaties and gave lot failed they migrated with Since then abraham pray for judgment on his female goat, canaanites differed from a wife did? The selecting of favorites was tragic in the family of Isaac. According to purchase the bible reveals his the abraham praying for judgment of canaanites lived. All yours as we find the will very same year who could make myself to spell the canaanites for abraham praying of judgment the tax collectors do to bring him, was little more than a direct effort. There was polygamous relationship with perfumes, unto the praying for rachel: and it on constant fellowship is impossible. Here it not fair to the men, and gomorrah had sent us that the day of god protects those of those. As well Lord commanded his servant Moses, so Moses commanded Joshua and Joshua did hear; he let nothing undone of laptop that present Lord commanded aoses. Hadad died, and Samlah of Masrekah succeeded him while king. Knowing that camels were canaanites was involved. Once the cleansing of the sanctuary is finished, the sin and uncleanness ofthe Israelites are placed on the goat for and sent to the wilderness. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
    [Show full text]
  • Terminals, Agricultural Crossings and Gates
    Terminals, Agricultural Crossings and Gates Umm Dar Terminals ’AkkabaDhaher al ’Abed Zabda Agricultural Gate (gap in the Wall) Controlled access through the Wall has been promised by the GOI to Ya’bad Wall (being finalised or complete) Masqufet al Hajj Mas’ud enable movement between Israel and the West Bank for Palestinian West Bank boundary/Green Line (estimate) Qaffin Imreiha populations who are either trapped in enclaves or isolated from their Road network agricultural lands. Palestinian Locality Hermesh Israeli Settlement Nazlat ’Isa An Nazla al Wusta According to Israel's State Attorney's office, five controlled crossings or NOTE: Agricultural Gate locations have been Baqa ash Sharqiya collected from field visits by OCHA staff and An Nazla ash Sharqiya terminals similar to the Erez terminal in northern Gaza will be built along information partners. The Wall trajectory is based on satellite imagery and field visits. An Nazla al Gharbiya the Wall. The Government of Israel recently decided that the Israeli Airport Authority will plan and operate the terminals. One of the main terminals between Israel and the West Bank appears to be being built Zeita Seida near Taibeh, 75 acres (300 dunums)35 in a part of Tulkarm City 36 Kafr Ra’i considered area A. ’Attil ’Illar The remaining terminals/control points are designated for areas near Jenin, Atarot north of Jerusalem, north of the Gush Etzion and near Deir al Ghusun Tarkumiyeh settlement bloc. Al Jarushiya Bal’a Agricultural Crossings and Gates Iktaba Al ’Attara The State Attorney's Office has stated that 26 agricultural gates will be TulkarmNur Shams Camp established along the length of the Wall to allow Palestinian farmers who Kafr Rumman have land west of the Wall, to cross.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Colonization Activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory During the 3Rd Quarter of 2017 (July- September) / 2017
    Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) & Land Research Center – Jerusalem (LRC) [email protected] | http://www.arij.org [email protected] | http://www.lrcj.org The Israeli Colonization Activities in the occupied Palestinian Territory during the 3rd Quarter of 2017 (July- September) / 2017 July to September 2017 The Quarterly report highlights the This presentation is prepared as part of the project entitled chronology of events concerning the “Addressing the Geopolitical Israeli Violations in the West Bank and the Changes in the Occupied Gaza Strip, the confiscation and razing of Palestinian Territory”, which lands, the uprooting and destruction of fruit is financially supported by the trees, the expansion of settlements and EU and SDC. However, the erection of outposts, the brutality of the contents of this presentation Israeli Occupation Army, the Israeli settlers are the sole responsibility of violence against Palestinian civilians and ARIJ and do not necessarily properties, the erection of checkpoints, the reflect those of the donors construction of the Israeli segregation wall and the issuance of military orders for the various Israeli purposes. 1 Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) & Land Research Center – Jerusalem (LRC) [email protected] | http://www.arij.org [email protected] | http://www.lrcj.org Map 1: The Israeli Segregation Plan in the occupied Palestinian Territory 2 Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) & Land Research Center – Jerusalem (LRC) [email protected] | http://www.arij.org [email protected] | http://www.lrcj.org Bethlehem Governorate (July 2017 - September 2017) Israeli Violations in Bethlehem Governorate during the Month of July 2017 • Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) assaulted and injured two Palestinian journalists; Raid Sharif and Radi Karama, while they were reporting the Israeli violations near Mazmoriya military checkpoint, east of Bethlehem city.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • English/Deportation/Statistics
    International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion Proceedings On Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Palestine Written Statement (30 January 2004) And Oral Pleading (23 February 2004) Preface 1. In October of 2003, increasing concern about the construction by Israel, the occupying Power, of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, in departure from the Armistice Line of 1949 (the Green Line) and deep into Palestinian territory, brought the issue to the forefront of attention and debate at the United Nations. The Wall, as it has been built by the occupying Power, has been rapidly expanding as a regime composed of a complex physical structure as well as practical, administrative and other measures, involving, inter alia, the confiscation of land, the destruction of property and countless other violations of international law and the human rights of the civilian population. Israel’s continued and aggressive construction of the Wall prompted Palestine, the Arab Group, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) to convey letters to the President of the United Nations Security Council in October of 2003, requesting an urgent meeting of the Council to consider the grave violations and breaches of international law being committed by Israel. 2. The Security Council convened to deliberate the matter on 14 October 2003. A draft resolution was presented to the Council, which would have simply reaffirmed, inter alia, the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force and would have decided that the “construction by Israel, the occupying Power, of a wall in the Occupied Territories departing from the armistice line of 1949 is illegal under relevant provisions of international law and must be ceased and reversed”.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace and Conflict Studies
    Peace and Conflict Studies Volume 17 Number 2 Article 7 11-2010 Front Matter Peace and Conflict Studies Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs Part of the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Peace and Conflict Studies (2010) "Front Matter," Peace and Conflict Studies: Vol. 17 : No. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol17/iss2/7 This Front Matter is brought to you for free and open access by the Peace & Conflict Studies at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peace and Conflict Studies by an authorized editor of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fall 2010 SSN 1082-7307 Volume 17, Number 2 Peace and Conflict Studies • An Anatomy of Conflict Resolution in Africa’s Civil Conflicts George Klay Kieh, Jr. • Who is More Humane? An Ethnographic Account of Power Struggles in Jewish-Palestinian Dialogue Encounters Nava Sonnenschein and Zvi Bekerman • The “Public” in “Public Peace Process” and in “Mini-Publics:” A Dialogue between Democratic Theory and Peace Studies Amit Ron • On the Cusp of Water War: A Diagnostic Account of the Volatile Geopolitics of the Middle East Ahmed Abukhater • Letters of Intent, Costly Signals, and Local Peacemaking in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Spencer B. Meredith, III EDITORIAL STAFF Editor-in-Chief: Honggang Yang Senior Consulting Editor: Howon Jeong Advisory Editor: Sean Byrne Managing Editor: Robin Cooper Editorial Team: Elena Bastidas, Dustin Berna, Jason Campbell, Mark Davidheiser, Cheryl Duckworth,
    [Show full text]
  • The Israel/Palestine Question
    THE ISRAEL/PALESTINE QUESTION The Israel/Palestine Question assimilates diverse interpretations of the origins of the Middle East conflict with emphasis on the fight for Palestine and its religious and political roots. Drawing largely on scholarly debates in Israel during the last two decades, which have become known as ‘historical revisionism’, the collection presents the most recent developments in the historiography of the Arab-Israeli conflict and a critical reassessment of Israel’s past. The volume commences with an overview of Palestinian history and the origins of modern Palestine, and includes essays on the early Zionist settlement, Mandatory Palestine, the 1948 war, international influences on the conflict and the Intifada. Ilan Pappé is Professor at Haifa University, Israel. His previous books include Britain and the Arab-Israeli Conflict (1988), The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1947–51 (1994) and A History of Modern Palestine and Israel (forthcoming). Rewriting Histories focuses on historical themes where standard conclusions are facing a major challenge. Each book presents 8 to 10 papers (edited and annotated where necessary) at the forefront of current research and interpretation, offering students an accessible way to engage with contemporary debates. Series editor Jack R.Censer is Professor of History at George Mason University. REWRITING HISTORIES Series editor: Jack R.Censer Already published THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND WORK IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY EUROPE Edited by Lenard R.Berlanstein SOCIETY AND CULTURE IN THE
    [Show full text]
  • The Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem
    Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Report on the Israeli Colonization Activities in the West Bank & the Gaza Strip Volume 189 , April 2014 Issue http://www.arij.org Bethlehem Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) in Ayda refugee camp, north of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired teargas and stun grenades at Palestinians, causing dozens of suffocation cases. (RB2000 1 April 2014) Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) in Ayda refugee camp, north of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired teargas and stun grenades at Palestinians, causing dozens of suffocation cases. During the clashes, the IOA arrested Abdalla Hamad (15 years). (Wattan 2 April 2014) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) raided and searched a number of Palestinian houses in Ad-Dhuheisheh refugee camp, south of Bethlehem city. Two of the targeted houses are owned by: Mohammad Al-‘Ajouri and Ashraf Taisir Al-‘Ajouri. (Al-Quds 3 April 2014) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) stormed Al-Ubidiya town, east of Bethlehem city and stationed near Ben Abed monastery. (RB2000 3 April 2014) Dozens of Palestinians were suffered gas inhalation after the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) fired teargas and stun grenades at Palestinians while they were praying at the northern entrance of Bethlehem city. (Wafa 4 April 2014) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) attacked the weekly non-violent protest against the segregation wall and settlements in Al-Masara village, south of Bethlehem city. (Maannews 4 April 2014) Israeli settlers living in Sde Boaz outpost uprooted 300 grapes trees and demolished a part of an agricultural room in Al-Khader village, west of Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecopeace Middle East
    EcoPeace Middle East Celebrating Earth Day at 50: EcoPeace Middle East – at the Intersection of Sustainability and Peacemaking by Gidon Bromberg With the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, EcoPeace Middle East’s Jordanian, Palestinian, and Israeli staff and interns are now all working remotely from home. Like everyone, we are adjusting as best we can to the ever-changing circumstances and closely following the guidelines of our respective Ministries of Health. As we develop creative ways to work virtually, we will be able to continue our important mission. Sadly, the coronavirus outbreak once again demonstrates the absolute urgency of cross-border cooperation. The virus, and environmental issues generally, simply do not recognize political borders. We remain committed as ever to promoting and facilitating regional cooperation towards the protection of our shared environment and our shared future. Founded in 1994, EcoPeace Middle East is a unique regional organization with offices in Amman, Ramallah, and Tel Aviv that brings together Jordanian, Palestinian, and Israeli environmentalists to work together to protect our shared environment. An award-winning trailblazer in the field of environmental peacebuilding, EcoPeace seeks to advance sustainable development while creating the necessary conditions for lasting peace in the region. EcoPeace’s staff work as teams of three, with department members from Israel, Jordan, and Palestine. This collaborative model ensures that each area’s perspective is accounted for. Most of the work is performed locally, but regional programs and planning meetings take place as well. EcoPeace’s distinctive approach combines both top-down advocacy for policy change and bottom-up community-based constituency building.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation
    Middle East Centre JUST BELOW THE SURFACE ISRAEL, THE ARAB GULF STATES AND THE LIMITS OF COOPERATION IAN BLACK LSE Middle East Centre Report | March 2019 About the Middle East Centre The Middle East Centre builds on LSE’s long engagement with the Middle East and provides a central hub for the wide range of research on the region carried out at LSE. The Middle East Centre aims to enhance understanding and develop rigorous research on the societies, economies, polities and international relations of the region. The Centre promotes both special- ised knowledge and public understanding of this crucial area, and has outstanding strengths in interdisciplinary research and in regional expertise. As one of the world’s leading social science institutions, LSE comprises departments covering all branches of the social sciences. The Middle East Centre harnesses this expertise to promote innova- tive research and training on the region. Middle East Centre Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation Ian Black LSE Middle East Centre Report March 2019 About the Author Ian Black is a former Middle East editor, diplomatic editor and European editor for the Guardian newspaper. He is currently Visiting Senior Fellow at the LSE Middle East Centre. His latest book is entitled Enemies and Neighbours: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917–2017. Abstract For over a decade Israel has been strengthening links with Arab Gulf states with which it has no diplomatic relations. Evidence of a convergence of Israel’s stra- tegic views with those of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain has accumulated as all displayed hostility to Iran’s regional ambitions and to United States President Barack Obama’s policies during the Arab Spring.
    [Show full text]