DOCSLIB.ORG

Sediment and Nutrient Loads from Stream Corridor Erosion Along Breached Millponds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sediment and Nutrient Loads from Stream Corridor Erosion Along Breached Millponds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE Sediment and Nutrient Loads from Stream Corridor Erosion along Breached Millponds Dorothy Merritts, Robert Walter, and Michael A. Rahnis 5/1/2010 Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 President Obama’s Executive Order regarding Chesapeake Bay watershed water quality ......... 6 1.2 Stream corridor and stream bank sediment sources from post-dam breach incised streams .... 6 1.3 Stream bank erosion mechanisms ................................................................................................ 7 1.4 Stream bank erosion rates and the concept of Sediment Production Unit (SPU) ........................ 9 1.5 Modeling dam breaches and changing rates of sediment production ....................................... 11 1.6 Estimates of original and remaining volumes of sediment in millpond reservoirs .................... 12 1.7 Total nitrogen and phosphorus in stream banks ........................................................................ 12 1.8 Prognosis ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Objectives of this investigation ................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Background to dams and reservoir sedimentation and erosion ................................................ 14 2.2.1 Milldams, sediment trapping, and trap efficiency .............................................................. 14 2.2.2 Case Study: Trap efficiency of the 19th c. Eaton-Dikeman paper mill reservoir, Cumberland County, PA ........................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.3 Conceptual model of post dam breach stream evolution: Incision and knickpoint migration 18 2.3 Gravitational and hydraulic forces on stream banks .................................................................. 20 2.4 Change in reservoir processes and rates of stream bank erosion after dam breaching ............ 21 3 Characteristics and Mechanisms of Stream Bank Erosion .................................................................. 23 3.1 Geomorphic processes of bank erosion ...................................................................................... 23 3.2 Erodibility and critical shear strength of stream bank sediment ................................................ 24 3.3 Freeze-thaw, cohesive banks of silt and clay, and stream bank erosion rates ........................... 24 3.4 Freeze-thaw cycling and the stream bank debris apron ............................................................. 27 4 Site Descriptions and Research Methods ........................................................................................... 28 4.1 Site locations ............................................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Research methods: Stream bank erosion rates .......................................................................... 30 4.3 Research methods: Measuring the concept of channel-normalized sediment production and its spatial and temporal variability .............................................................................................................. 31 4.3.1 The concept of a channel-normalized Sediment Production Unit (SPU) ............................ 31 4.3.2 Converting volume of sediment eroded to mass (tons) ..................................................... 32 ii 4.3.3 Spatial and temporal variability in stream corridor erosion rates ...................................... 32 4.4 Quantifying nutrients stored in stream bank sediments ............................................................ 33 4.4.1 Field sampling and analytical methods ............................................................................... 33 5 Data and Results ................................................................................................................................. 34 5.1 Stream bank erosion rates and dam breaching: Overview ......................................................... 34 5.2 Case studies for measurements of stream bank erosion rates .................................................. 36 5.2.1 Hammer Creek—breached in 2001 .................................................................................... 36 5.2.2 Mountain Creek—breached in 1985 ................................................................................... 37 5.2.3 Conoy Creek—breached ca. 1972±10 yr ............................................................................. 38 5.2.4 Valley Creek—breached ca. 1920 ....................................................................................... 40 5.2.5 Big Spring Run ..................................................................................................................... 42 5.2.6 Little Conestoga Creek, West Branch, Denlingers Mill—breached ca. 1930±10 yr ............ 43 5.2.7 Big Beaver Creek—breached in 1972.................................................................................. 44 5.2.8 Penns Creek—breached in 1968 ......................................................................................... 45 5.2.9 Gunpowder Falls, Hoffman Mill Pond—breached in 1932 ................................................. 46 5.2.10 White Clay Creek—breached prior to 1938 ........................................................................ 46 5.3 Total nitrogen and phosphorus in stream banks ........................................................................ 47 6 Discussion of Results ........................................................................................................................... 47 6.1 Rates of bank erosion and sediment production curves ............................................................ 47 6.2 Modeling dam breaches and changing rates of sediment production ....................................... 50 6.3 Implications for sediment and nutrient loads to streams from stream bank erosion of legacy sediment ................................................................................................................................................. 52 6.4 Estimates of original and remaining volumes of sediment in millpond reservoirs .................... 54 7 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 56 8 Works Cited ......................................................................................................................................... 59 A. County Maps of Historical Dams ....................................................................................................... 130 B. Methodologies .................................................................................................................................. 137 Estimating Change from Digital Orthophotos ....................................................................................... 137 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 137 Orthoimagery .................................................................................................................................... 137 Aerial Photography ........................................................................................................................... 137 Feature Digitization ........................................................................................................................... 138 iii Feature Attribution ........................................................................................................................... 138 Estimating Volume Change ............................................................................................................... 138 Stratigraphic Horizons and Local Datum Surfaces ................................................................................ 139 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 139 Interpreting Legacy Sediment Features on Bare Earth Lidar ............................................................ 139 Delineation of Terrace Surfaces with Lidar in ArcGIS ....................................................................... 139 Delineation of Water Surfaces in ArcGIS .......................................................................................... 140 Calculation of Channel Volume ......................................................................................................... 140 Determining Bank Height Distribution .................................................................................................. 140 C. Production by Station ....................................................................................................................... 142 D. Production by Field Area ................................................................................................................... 145 iv 1 Executive Summary This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kayaking • Fishing • Lodging Table of Contents
    KAYAKING • FISHING • LODGING TABLE OF CONTENTS Fishing 4-13 Kayaking & Tubing 14-15 Rules & Regulations 16 Lodging 17-19 1 W. Market St. Lewistown, PA 17044 www.JRVVisitors.com 717-248-6713 [email protected] The Juniata River Valley Visitors Bureau thanks the following contributors to this directory. Without your knowledge and love of our waterways, this directory would not be possible. Joshua Hill Nick Lyter Brian Shumaker Penni Abram Paul Wagner Bob Wert Todd Jones Helen Orndorf Ryan Cherry Thankfully, The Juniata River Valley Visitors Bureau Jenny Landis, executive director Buffie Boyer, marketing assistant Janet Walker, distribution manager 2 PAFLYFISHING814 Welcome to the JUNIATA RIVER VALLEY Located in the heart of Central Pennsylvania, the Juniata River Valley, is named for the river that flows from Huntingdon County to Perry County where it meets the Susquehanna River. Spanning more than 100 miles, the Juniata River flows through a picturesque valley offering visitors a chance to explore the area’s wide fertile valleys, small towns, and the natural heritage of the region. The Juniata River watershed is comprised of more than 6,500 miles of streams, including many Class A fishing streams. The river and its tributaries are not the only defining characteristic of our landscape, but they are the center of our recreational activities. From traditional fishing to fly fishing, kayaking to camping, the area’s waterways are the ideal setting for your next fishing trip or family vacation. Come and “Discover Our Good Nature” any time of year! Find Us! The Juniata River Valley is located in Central Pennsylvania midway between State College and Harrisburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Kochel Et Al., 2009
    Geomorphology 110 (2009) 80–95 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Catastrophic middle Pleistocene jökulhlaups in the upper Susquehanna River: Distinctive landforms from breakout floods in the central Appalachians R. Craig Kochel a,⁎, Richard P. Nickelsen a, L. Scott Eaton b a Department of Geology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA b Department of Geology & Environmental Science, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA article info abstract Article history: Widespread till and moraines record excursions of middle-Pleistocene ice that flowed up-slope into several Received 14 November 2008 watersheds of the Valley and Ridge Province along the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. A unique Received in revised form 23 March 2009 landform assemblage was created by ice-damming and jökulhlaups emanating from high gradient mountain Accepted 24 March 2009 watersheds. This combination of topography formed by multiple eastward-plunging anticlinal ridges, and the Available online 6 April 2009 upvalley advance of glaciers resulted in an ideal geomorphic condition for the formation of temporary ice- dammed lakes. Extensive low gradient (1°–2° slope) gravel surfaces dominate the mountain front Keywords: geomorphology in this region and defy simple explanation. The geomorphic circumstances that occurred Jökulhlaup Ice-damming in tributaries to the West Branch Susquehanna River during middle Pleistocene glaciation are extremely rare Susquehanna River and may be unique in the world. Failure of ice dams released sediment-rich water from lakes, entraining Middle Pleistocene cobbles and boulders, and depositing them in elongated debris fans extending up to 9 km downstream from Valley and Ridge their mountain-front breakout points.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS
    2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Votes Loyalsock As PA River of the Year Perkiomen TU Leads
    Winter 2018 Publication of the Pa. Council of Trout Unlimited www.patrout.org Perkiomen TU Students to leads restoration research brookies project on on Route 6 trek By Charlie Charlesworth namesake creek PATU President By Thomas W. Smith Perkiomen Valley TU President In summer 2018, six college students from our PATU 5 Rivers clubs will spend a The Perkiomen Valley Chapter of month trekking across Pennsylvania’s U.S. Trout Unlimited partnered with Sundance Route 6. Their purpose will be to explore, Creek Consulting, the Montgomery do research, collect data and still have time County Conservation District, Penn State do a little bit of fishing in the northern tier’s Master Watershed Stewards and Upper famed brook trout breeding grounds. Perkiomen High School for a stream They will be supported by the PA Fish restoration project on Perkiomen Creek, and Boat Commission, three colleges in- Contributed Photo which was carried out over five days in Volunteers work on a stream restora- cluding Mansfield, Keystone and hopefully See CREEK, page 7 tion project along Perkiomen Creek. See TREK, page 2 Public votes Loyalsock as PA River of the Year By Pennsylvania DCNR Home to legions of paddlers, anglers, and other outdoors enthusiasts in north central Pennsylvania, Loyalsock Creek has been voted the 2018 Pennsylvania River of the Year. The public was invited to vote online, choosing from among five waterways nominated across the state. Results were pariveroftheyear.org Photo See RIVER, page 2 Loyalsock Creek was voted 2018 Pennsylvania River of the Year. IN THIS ISSUE Keystone Coldwater Conference ..........................3 How to become a stream advocate.......................6 Headwaters .............................................................4 Minutes ....................................................................8 Treasurer’s Notes ...................................................5 Chapter Reports ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018
    Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018 Prepared by Douglas L. Moyer and Joel D. Blomquist, U.S. Geological Survey, March 2, 2020 The Chesapeake Bay nontidal network (NTN) currently consists of 123 stations throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Stations are located near U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream-flow gages to permit estimates of nutrient and sediment loadings and trends in the amount of loadings delivered downstream. Routine samples are collected monthly, and 8 additional storm-event samples are also collected to obtain a total of 20 samples per year, representing a range of discharge and loading conditions (Chesapeake Bay Program, 2020). The Chesapeake Bay partnership uses results from this monitoring network to focus restoration strategies and track progress in restoring the Chesapeake Bay. Methods Changes in nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended-sediment loads in rivers across the Chesapeake Bay watershed have been calculated using monitoring data from 123 NTN stations (Moyer and Langland, 2020). Constituent loads are calculated with at least 5 years of monitoring data, and trends are reported after at least 10 years of data collection. Additional information for each monitoring station is available through the USGS website “Water-Quality Loads and Trends at Nontidal Monitoring Stations in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed” (https://cbrim.er.usgs.gov/). This website provides State, Federal, and local partners as well as the general public ready access to a wide range of data for nutrient and sediment conditions across the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In this summary, results are reported for the 10-year period from 2009 through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 2017-2020 Highway & Bridge User Friendly
    DRAFT 2017-2020 HIGHWAY & BRIDGE USER FRIENDLY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) - Lancaster County SORTED BY MUNICIPALITY Bold = new project 4/20/16 2. MPMS SR PROJECT NAME DESCRIPTION MUNICIPALITY PHASE COST * Bowmansville Rd bridge 101037 1088 preservation Bridge preservation on Bowmansville Road over US 222 Brecknock Township P $1,400,000 Little Muddy Creek 78906 1044 Bridge Bridge Replacement on Red Run Road over Little Muddy Creek Brecknock Township PFUR $325,000 Resurfacing on Prince Street from King Street to W. Andrew Street, Duke Street from South Queen 93088 222 City Resurface Street to Lime Street, and Duke Street from McGovern Avenue to Orange Street City of Lancaster C $2,890,000 106630 0 Charlotte St. Two-way Conversion of Charlotte Street from one-way to two-way traffic from James St. to King Street City of Lancaster C $977,000 Pitney Road Bridge over City of Lancaster and East 84016 3028 Amtrak Bridge Rehabilitation on Pitney Road over Amtrak Bridge Lampeter Township C $2,700,000 Widening, signalization, and non-motorized improvements on Harrisburg Pike from US 30 to Lancaster County City of Lancaster, 80932 4020 Harrisburg Pike Reserve Solid Waste Management Authority Manheim Township C $4,000,000 Kleinfeltersville Rd 91267 1035 Bridge Bridge Replacement on Kleinfeltersville Road over a tributary to Middle Creek Clay Township PC $350,000 Lincoln Rd bridge 78893 1024 improvements Bridge Improvements on Lincoln Road over Hammer Creek east of Clay Road Clay Township PFRC $1,776,000 Columbia Borough Signal Traffic
    [Show full text]
  • PINE CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Schuylkill County
    PINE CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Schuylkill County For Acid Mine Drainage Affected Segments Prepared by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection November 10, 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................. 3 Directions to the Pine Creek Watershed..................................................................................... 3 Watershed History ...................................................................................................................... 4 Segments addressed in this TMDL............................................................................................. 4 Clean Water Act Requirements .................................................................................................. 5 Section 303(d) Listing Process ................................................................................................... 6 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL........................................................................................ 6 AMD Methodology..................................................................................................................... 7 TMDL Endpoints........................................................................................................................ 9 TMDL Elements (WLA, LA, MOS) .......................................................................................... 9 Allocation Summary................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Cbfposter Final New
    . r Otsego r e C Lake v r i n e R The Chesapeake Bay Watershed v o i a t R l r l Cooperstown r i a c e h NEW YORK i d r l v e i a W v e i s n R R t U Cortland O o g n A watershed is all of the land whose water and a a n g o e m h h C rainfall will eventually drain into a particular river, g C u o o h i o T C c a t lake, bay, or other body of water. o n n r i R st ive e eo Rive r i v r a R nn a h e Binghampton u The Chesapeake Bay watershed is 64,000 square q s Elmira u miles and has 11,600 miles of tidal shoreline, S including tidal wetlands and islands. The watershed T Montrose i o g a encompasses parts of six states: Delaware, ine Creek P Wellsboro reek R a C i r and Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and v e Tow k West Virginia, as well as Washington D.C. e e r C g Scranton Approximately 17 million people live in the n Laporte m o eek c r anch Su y C Br s L watershed; about 10 million people live along its ing q hon u r a e ve h i m R e a Rive a Wilkes Barre n t Williamsport r nn n s n a shores or near them.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster County Incremental Deliveredhammer a Creekgricultural Lititz Run Lancasterload of Nitro Gcountyen Per HUC12 Middle Creek
    PENNSYLVANIA Lancaster County Incremental DeliveredHammer A Creekgricultural Lititz Run LancasterLoad of Nitro gCountyen per HUC12 Middle Creek Priority Watersheds Cocalico Creek/Conestoga River Little Cocalico Creek/Cocalico Creek Millers Run/Little Conestoga Creek Little Muddy Creek Upper Chickies Creek Lower Chickies Creek Muddy Creek Little Chickies Creek Upper Conestoga River Conoy Creek Middle Conestoga River Donegal Creek Headwaters Pequea Creek Hartman Run/Susquehanna River City of Lancaster Muddy Run/Mill Creek Cabin Creek/Susquehanna River Eshlemen Run/Pequea Creek West Branch Little Conestoga Creek/ Little Conestoga Creek Pine Creek Locally Generated Green Branch/Susquehanna River Valley Creek/ East Branch Ag Nitrogen Pollution Octoraro Creek Lower Conestoga River (pounds/acre/year) Climbers Run/Pequea Creek Muddy Run/ 35.00–45.00 East Branch 25.00–34.99 Fishing Creek/Susquehanna River Octoraro Creek Legend 10.00–24.99 West Branch Big Beaver Creek Octoraro Creek 5.00–9.99 Incremental Delivered Load NMap (l Createdbs/a byc rThee /Chesapeakeyr) Bay Foundation Data from USGS SPARROW Model (2011) Conowingo Creek 0.00–4.99 0.00 - 4.99 cida.usgs.gov/sparrow Tweed Creek/Octoraro Creek 5.00 - 9.99 10.00 - 24.99 25.00 - 34.99 35.00 - 45.00 Map Created by The Chesapeake Bay Foundation Data from USGS SPARROW Model (2011) http://cida.usgs.gov/sparrow PENNSYLVANIA York County Incremental Delivered Agricultural YorkLoad Countyof Nitrogen per HUC12 Priority Watersheds Hartman Run/Susquehanna River York City Cabin Creek Green Branch/Susquehanna
    [Show full text]
  • PA COAST Priority Ag Watersheds.Xls
    PA_COAST_Priority_Ag_Watersheds.xls HUC_12 HU_12_NAME STATES PARAMETER 020503050505 Lower Yellow Breeches Creek PA N and P 020700040601 Headwaters West Branch Conococheague Creek PA N and P 020503060904 Cocalico Creek-Conestoga River PA N and P 020503061104 Middle Conestoga River PA N and P 020503061701 Conoy Creek PA N and P 020503061103 Upper Conestoga River PA N and P 020503061105 Lititz Run PA N and P 020503051009 Fishing Creek-York County PA N and P 020402030701 Upper French Creek PA N and P 020503061102 Muddy Creek PA N and P 020503060801 Upper Chickies Creek PA N and P 020402030608 Hay Creek PA N and P 020503051010 Conewago Creek PA N and P 020402030606 Green Hills Lake-Allegheny Creek PA N and P 020503061101 Little Muddy Creek PA N and P 020503051011 Laurel Run-Susquehanna River PA N and P 020503060902 Middle Creek PA N and P 020503060903 Hammer Creek PA N and P 020503060901 Little Cocalico Creek-Cocalico Creek PA N and P 020503050904 Spring Creek PA N and P 020503050906 Swatara Creek-Susquehanna River PA N and P 020402030605 Wyomissing Creek PA N and P 020503050801 Killinger Creek PA N and P 020503050105 Laurel Run PA N and P 020402030408 Cacoosing Creek PA N and P 020402030401 Mill Creek PA N and P 020503050802 Snitz Creek-Quittapahilla Creek PA N and P 020503040404 Aughwick Creek-Juniata River PA N and P 020402030406 Spring Creek PA N and P 020402030702 Lower French Creek PA N and P 020503020703 East Branch Standing Stone Creek PA N and P 020503040802 Little Lost Creek-Lost Creek PA N and P 020503041001 Upper Cocolamus Creek
    [Show full text]