DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Quality of River Yamuna During the Lockdown Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Quality of River Yamuna During the Lockdown Background OFFICE OF THE YAMUNA POLLUTION MONITORING COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY HON’BLE NGT ROOM NO. 58, INDIA INTERNATIONAL CENTRE 40, MAX MUELLER MARG, LODHI ESTATE NEW DELHI – 110003 Dated: 21.04.2020 Subject: Water Quality of River Yamuna during the Lockdown Background: Yamuna Pollution Monitoring Committee (YMC) observed a number of reports and pictures of river Yamuna appearing in the media, including social media, which showed improvement in water quality in the river after the lock down imposed by the Government. YMC members also started receiving telephonic calls from different media agencies seeking confirmation about the improvement in water quality and the reasons therefor. In order to settle the matter, the YMC asked both CPCB and DPCC, through Whatsapp messages sent to the Member Secretaries on 4th and 5th April, to undertake testing of water quality in the river as well as the main drains joining the river and submit a report within one week giving detailed analysis of the results and the causative factors for improvement, if any noticed, in water quality. Test and Analysis Reports: 1. DPCC Report of 15.4.20: The Report of DPCC received on 15.4.20 is based on samples collected at 9 stations along the river and at 20 stations on the drains. The analysis suggests that there is deterioration in water quality at 4 stations, namely, Palla, Surghat, Khajuri Paltoon Pool(downstream of Najafgarh drain point) and Kudesia Ghat whereas there is improvement ranging from 20-33% in BOD at 5 stations, namely, ITO, Nizamuddin, Agra canal Jaitpur, Okhla barrage(Upstream) and Ohkla barrage(downstream after meeting of Shahdara drain). The Water quality measured on 6.4.20 has been compared with corresponding data for the year 2019. Another 1 significant factor held responsible for the improvement, wherever noticed, is almost four-fold increase in fresh water availability downstream of Wazirabad in April 2020 (DPCC report is Placed at Annexure -1, Page no. 4). 2. CPCB Report of 20.4.20: The Report of CPCB received on 20.4.20 is based on samples collected at three stations, namely, Palla, Nizamuddin and Okhla (Downstream) and 16 major drains. The major findings are that the water quality at all the three stations has improved significantly over pre lock down quality. In fact BOD at Nizamuddin and Okhla has decreasedincreased by as much as 80 to 90% with similar decreasesincreases in COD, though DO levels were still low. The waste water quality in two major drains, namely, Najafgarh and Shahdara, which contribute to about 2/3rd of the hydraulic load of all the drains, has also shown improvement of about 30-45% in BOD, though the drains even with this improvement had BOD levels of 56 mg/L and 89 mg/L respectively. The Report, based on the data supplied by DJB, also has pointed out that the fresh water availability which was less than 1000 cusecs prior to lockdown, increased, more than fivefold downstream of Wazirabad during the lockdown. Besides the fact that all the industries, which contributed to about 36 MLD of effluent, having been closed also helped improve water quality. Other factors attributed are due to stoppage of human activities such as throwing of Pooja materials, solid waste disposal, bathing and washing of clothes etc. which were minimised during the ongoing lockdown. (CPCB Report placed at Annexure- 2, Page no. 12). 2 YMC’s Observation: As may be seen, there is some variance between the results of the tests carried out by the CPCB and DPCC. Though YMC had asked the CPCB to compile the data of CPCB and DPCC and submit a consolidated report, CPCB informed that such an exercise was not possible in the present situation. Also, whereas the report of DPCC is based on samples collected at 9 stations along the river, the report of CPCB is based on samples from 3 stations. The timing and location of the samples collected were not the same. However the common findings are as under; 1. There was significant increase (5 to 6 fold) in fresh water availability during the Month of April downstream of Wazirabad which helped in dilution of the pollution caused due to waste water from major drains like Najafgarh and Shahdara, which even during the Lockdown period had BOD of 56 mg/L and 89 mg/L respectively. Therefore, for improvement in water quality, availability of fresh water in significant quantities is of importance. 2. Industrial effluent, from 28 industrial clusters and industries in non- conforming/residential areas, was absent during the period of lockdown. Residential areas are estimated to have more than 51000 industries. Preventing any industrial effluent going into the drains and eventually the river has contributed to improvement in the water quality. This is also clear from significant reduction in the COD levels both in the drains and the river. 3. Other human activities like stoppage of indiscriminate dumping of solid waste, C&D waste, pooja material, washings and bathing and even unauthorised dumping of septage during the lockdown have also contributed to the improvement. 3 ａｮｮ･ｸｵｲ･＠Ｍ＠Ｑ ASSESSMENT OF YAMUNA RIVER WATER QUALITY, DELHI DURING LOCK DOWN PERIOD DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE 5TH FLOOR, ISBT BUILDING, KASHMERE GATE, DELHI-6 (Visit us at: http://dpcc.delhigovt.nic.in) (APRIL 2020) 4 ASSESSMENT OF RIVER WATER QUALITY DURING LOCK DOWN PERIOD Delhi Pollution Control Committee has monitored the water quality of River Yamuna on 06.04.2020 at 9 locations and drains at 20 locations during lockdown period. The data obtained was compared with previous year data (April 2019). The assessment is given below: A. River Water Quality Assessment 1. Palla: No reduction in pollution level of water quality was observed at Palla during lockdown. However, water quality is meeting the Water Quality Criteria of Bathing Standard (Class ‘C’) 2. Surghat: No reduction in pollution level of water quality was observed at Surghat. However, water quality is meeting the Water Quality Criteria of Bathing Standard. 3. Khajuri Paltoon Pool (d/s Najafgarh Drain): 42% increase in BOD pollution level was observed. 4. Kudesia Ghat: No significant change (4%) in pollution level of water quality was observed at Kudesia Ghat. 5. ITO Bridge: 21% reduction in pollution level of water quality was observed at ITO Bridge. 6. Nizamuddin Bridge: 20% reduction in pollution level of water quality was observed at ITO Bridge during lockdown period. 7. Agra Canal Jaitpur: : 26% reduction in pollution level of water quality was observed at Agra Canal Jaitpur during lockdown. 8. Agra Canal Okhla Barrage: 33% reduction in pollution level of water quality was observed at Agra Canal Okhla during lockdown. 5 9. D/s Okhla Barrage (after meeting Shahdara drain): 18% reduction in pollution level of water quality was observed at Agra Canal Okhla during lockdown. CONCLUSION The quality of water in river Yamuna improved during lockdown period. At Okhla Barrage BOD value of 16 mg/l was observed, compared to 24 mg/l last year (April 2019) (33% improvement). However, the water quality is not meeting the Water Quality Criteria. In April 2019 the average flow was 1000 cusecs compared to average flow of 3900 cusecs in April 2020. Therefore, the dilution is also contributing to the improvement of water quality. 6 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POLLUTION LEVEL (BOD) IN RIVER YAMUNA, DELHI BOD (mg/L) April, 2019 April, 2020 33 35 28 28 30 25 24 22 24 23 23 25 19 20 20 16 16 17 15 10 3.8 5 1.7 2.8 2.8 0 Palla Surghat Palton Pool Kudesia Ghat ITO Bridge Nizamuddin Agra Canal Agra Canal D/S okhla Bridge (Okhla (Jaitpur) Barrage after Bridge) meeting Shahdara Drain ASSESSMENT OF % REDUCTION Sr. Location % Reduction BOD mg/l No. (2020) Monitoring Year April, 2019 April, 2020 1 Palla 1.7 2.8 - 2 Surghat 2.8 3.8 - `3 Palton Pool 19 33 - 4 Kudesia Ghat 24 25 - 5 ITO Bridge 28 22 21 6 Nizamuddin Bridge 20 16 20 7 Agra Canal, Okhla Bridge 24 16 33 8 Agra Canal (Jaitpur 23 17 26 9 D/S Okhla Barrage after 18 28 23 meeting Shahdara Drain 7 WATER QUALITY OF RIVER YAMUNA (APRIL 2019 & APRIL 2020) S.No. Location Date of pH COD mg/l BOD mg/l DO mg/l Faecal Monitoring Coliform( MPN/100ml) Primary Water Quality Criteria 6.5- - 3 mg/l or less 5 mg/l or 500(desirable for Bathing Water 8.5 more 2500 (maximum permissible) 1 Palla April, 2020 8.00 12.0 2.8 6.9 18x102 April, 2019 7.6 8 1.7 8.5 - 2 Surghat April, 2020 8.06 16.0 3.8 6.8 170 April, 2019 7.4 12 2.8 5.8 - 3 Palton Pool April, 2020 7.24 116.0 33.0 NIL 13x106 April, 2019 7.5 64 19 NIL - 4 Kudesia April, 2020 7.37 60.0 25.0 NIL 14x106 Ghat April, 2019 7.2 76 24 NIL - 5 ITO Bridge April, 2020 7.63 32.0 22.0 2.3 33x106 April, 2019 7 88 28 NIL - 6 Nizamuddin April, 2020 7.64 42.0 16.0 2.3 63x104 Bridge April, 2019 7 68 20 NIL - 7 Agra Canal, April, 2020 7.46 42.0 16.0 4.8 26x104 (Okhla April, 2019 7.3 68 24 NIL - Barrage) 8 Agra Canal April, 2020 7.45 48.0 17.0 4.2 14x105 (Jaitpur ) April, 2019 7.4 64 23 NIL - 9 D/S okhla April, 2020 7.63 76.0 23 NIL 12x105 Barrage April, 2019 7.4 96 28 NIL - after meeting Shardra Drain 8 B, Drain Waste Water Quality Assessment wrt BOD 1, Najafgarh Drain: 22% reduction in pollution level of drain waste water quality was observed in April 2020 as compared to April 2019.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bird Species in Delhi-“Birdwatching” Tourism
    Conference Proceedings: 2 nd International Scientific Conference ITEMA 2018 BIRD SPECIES IN DELHI-“BIRDWATCHING” TOURISM Zeba Zarin Ansari 63 Ajay Kumar 64 Anton Vorina 65 https://doi.org/10.31410/itema.2018.161 Abstract : A great poet William Wordsworth once wrote in his poem “The world is too much with us” that we do not have time to relax in woods and to see birds chirping on trees. According to him we are becoming more materialistic and forgetting the real beauty of nature. Birds are counted one of beauties of nature and indeed they are smile giver to human being. When we get tired or bored of something we seek relax to a tranquil place to overcome the tiredness. Different birds come every morning to make our day fresh. But due to drainage system, over population, cutting down of trees and many other disturbances in the metro city like Delhi, lots of species of birds are disappearing rapidly. Thus a conservation and management system need to be required to stop migration and disappearance of birds. With the government initiative and with the help of concerned NGOs and other departments we need to settle to the construction of skyscrapers. As we know bird watching tourism is increasing rapidly in the market, to make this tourism as the fastest outdoor activity in Delhi, the place will have to focus on the conservation and protection of the wetlands and forests, management of groundwater table to make a healthy ecosystem, peaceful habitats and pollution-free environment for birds. Delhi will also have to concentrate on what birdwatchers require, including their safety, infrastructure, accessibility, quality of birdlife and proper guides.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Analysis of Yamuna River
    Journal of Materials Science & Surface Engineering, 6(6): 905-908 ISSN (Online): 2348-8956; 10.jmsse/2348-8956/6-6.6 Biological analysis of Yamuna River Pooja Upadhyay · Arushi Saxena · Pammi Gauba Department of Biotechnology, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida A-10, Sector-62, Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201307. ARTICLE HISTORY ABSTRACT Received 30-03-2019 Water pollution is a very common cause of major health problems across the globe. The most common and Revised 01-09-2019 widespread health risk associated with drinking water is contamination. The pathogenic agents involved Accepted 06-09-2019 include bacteria, viruses, and protozoa, which may cause diseases that vary in severity from mild Published 01-12-2019 gastroenteritis to severe and sometimes fatal diarrhea, dysentery, hepatitis, or typhoid fever, most of them are widely distributed throughout the world. Biological testing methods are progressively often used for KEYWORDS determining the surface water quality. In the biological analysis of the water samples using methods like, Biological testing most probable number (MPN) method, glutamate starch phenol red agar and hektoen enteric agar, we Contamination observed various organisms like Coliform bacteria, Aeromonas, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, and Shigella, Harmful organism which are harmful for consumption of population to be present in the river water. The biological methods Water pollution are used for analyzing water quality involves collection, counting and identification of micro organisms, measurement of metabolic activity rates, and processing and interpretation of biological data. In this paper, we have done a comparative analysis of microbes present in samples collected from different places and their impact on water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Condition of the Yamuna River - an Overview of Flow, Pollution Load and Human Use
    Current condition of the Yamuna River - an overview of flow, pollution load and human use Deepshikha Sharma and Arun Kansal, TERI University Introduction Yamuna is the sub-basin of the Ganga river system. Out of the total catchment’s area of 861404 sq km of the Ganga basin, the Yamuna River and its catchment together contribute to a total of 345848 sq. km area which 40.14% of total Ganga River Basin (CPCB, 1980-81; CPCB, 1982-83). It is a large basin covering seven Indian states. The river water is used for both abstractive and in stream uses like irrigation, domestic water supply, industrial etc. It has been subjected to over exploitation, both in quantity and quality. Given that a large population is dependent on the river, it is of significance to preserve its water quality. The river is polluted by both point and non-point sources, where National Capital Territory (NCT) – Delhi is the major contributor, followed by Agra and Mathura. Approximately, 85% of the total pollution is from domestic source. The condition deteriorates further due to significant water abstraction which reduces the dilution capacity of the river. The stretch between Wazirabad barrage and Chambal river confluence is critically polluted and 22km of Delhi stretch is the maximum polluted amongst all. In order to restore the quality of river, the Government of India (GoI) initiated the Yamuna Action Plan (YAP) in the1993and later YAPII in the year 2004 (CPCB, 2006-07). Yamuna river basin River Yamuna (Figure 1) is the largest tributary of the River Ganga. The main stream of the river Yamuna originates from the Yamunotri glacier near Bandar Punch (38o 59' N 78o 27' E) in the Mussourie range of the lower Himalayas at an elevation of about 6320 meter above mean sea level in the district Uttarkashi (Uttranchal).
    [Show full text]
  • River Yamuna Water 2
    3 Protective Biodiversity zone Revitalizing the 3 Biodiversity Parks Yamuna Public 1 Zones Signature 4 Bridge Public 2 Recreational Zones Riverside 5 Promenade by R.G. GUPTA CITY/POLICY PLANNER APRIL 2010 Public 1 Zones DEVELOPMENT Yamuna OF RIVER FOUR PARTS PART 1 TO INCREASE QUANTITY OF WATER PART 2 TO CLEAN WATER TO IMPROVE ITS QUALITY Yamuna PART 3 TO DEVELOP INDRAPRASTHA PAURI NEAR C. POWER STATION PART 4 REVITALIZING THE YAMMUNA RIVER FRONT PROPOSAL OF DDA (TOI) RIVER YAMMUNA FROM WAZIRABAD TO JAITPUR 1 R.G. GUPTA; CITY/POLICY PLANNER; APRIL 2010 PERSPECTIVE PLAN OF WATER Yamuna BY 2021 AD PROBABLE QUANTITY 1 FROM GANGA = 200 MGD 2 BY STORING WATER IN RIVER = 800 MGD 3 ADDITIONAL WATER FROM = 150 MGD HARYANA 4 RAINY WELL ETC = 30 MGD 5 ON CHANNEL & OFF CHANNEL = 150 MGD 6 GROUND WATER = 200 MGD WATER FROM 373 EXISTING PONDS 7 = * IN DELHI TOTAL 1530 MGD + * 2 R.G. GUPTA; CITY/POLICY PLANNER; APRIL 2010 OBJECTIVES Yamuna 1. INCREASE QUANTITY OF WATER TO A LARGE EXTENT, TO GET BLESSINGS OF LAKHS OF PEOPLE. 2. TO CLEAN WATER TO IMPROVE ITS QUALITY & ULTIMATELY HEALTH OF PUBLIC AT LARGE. 3. TO DEVELOP INDRAPRASTHA PAURI TO REVIVE GEETA NEAR C. POWER STATION. 4. TO DEVELOP BIODIVERSITY PARKS, SMALL & BIG LAKES TO HAVE CONTROLLED CLIMATE – PROPOSAL OF DDA MAIN PARAMETRES 50 kmt. with half in north & the balance in the south of 1 Wazirabad Barrage 2 1.5 kmt. to 3 kmt. 3 97 sq.kmt. 4 16.45 sq.kmt. 5 80.55 sq.kmt. (i) Wazirabad barrage – 455mts.; (ii) ISBT road bridge- 552mts.; (iii) Old rail-cum-road bridge – 800mts.; (iv) Indraprastha barrage -552mts.; 6 (v) Metro bridge ----; (vi) Nizamuddin railway bridge- 578mts.; (vii) Nizamuddin road bridge- 549mts.; (viii) Okhla weir- 791mts.; (ix) Okhla barrage - 554mts.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Control Room Daily Report
    FLOOD CONTROL ROOM FLOOD CONTROL DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI L.M. BUND OFFICE COMPLEX, SHASTRI NAGAR, DELHI-110031. TEL. NO. 22428773 & 22428774 Email : [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected] DAILY REPORT OF WEATHER AND FLOOD SITUATION. Date: 02.09.2020 (I) WEATHER REPORT (As provided by I.M.D) 1. WEATHER FORECAST FOR RIVER YAMUNA Upper Catchment : One or Two Places Heavy rain fall warning : Nil Out look : No Large Change Lower Catchment : One or Two Places Heavy rainfall warning : Nil Out look : No Large Change 2. WEATHER FORECAST FOR RIVER SAHIBI : One or Two Places Heavy rain fall warning : Nil Out look : No Large Change 3. LOCAL FORECAST : Generally cloudy sky with very light rain/thundershowers towards evening/night. The maximum and minimum temperatures would be around 35 and 25 Degree Celsius respectively. 4. RAINFALL DURING LAST 24 HOURS (in mm) Delhi (a) Palam : 0.0 (b) Safdarjung 0.0 (c) Dhansa : 0.0 (d) Delhi Rly. Bridge 0.0 (II) Total Rainfall in Delhi (SFD) during last 24 Hours (up to 8.30 a.m.) 0.0 mm (III) Total Rainfall in Delhi (SFD) from 1st June to till date 555.6 mm (iv) Average Normal Rainfall (SFD) in Delhi, 1st June to till date 540.5 mm (V) Average Total Normal Rainfall in Delhi. 618.7 mm (VI) RAINFALL IN YAMUNA CATCHMENT (in mm) Shimla : 0.0 Ambala : 0.0 Solan : 0.0 Paonta : 0.0 Chandigarh : 0.0 Hathni kund Barrage : 0.0 Jateon Barrage : 0.0 Dadupur : 0.0 Nahan : 0.0 Dehradun : 0.0 Haripur : 0.0 Patiala : 0.0 : Saharanpur : 0.0 Karnal : 0.0 Mathura : 0.0 (VII) RAINFALL IN SAHIBI CATCHMENT(in mm) Dadri Toye : 0.0 Rewari : 0.0 Massani Barrage : 0.0 Jaipur : 3.0 (VIII) INFERENCE: SYNOPTIC SITUATION (MORNING INFERENCE): The low-pressure area over Pakistan & adjoining west Rajasthan has become less marked.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeological Characterization and Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Shallow Aquifers in Vicinity of Najafgarh Drain of NCT Delhi
    Hydrogeological characterization and assessment of groundwater quality in shallow aquifers in vicinity of Najafgarh drain of NCT Delhi Shashank Shekhar and Aditya Sarkar Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India. ∗Corresponding author. e-mail: [email protected] Najafgarh drain is the biggest drain in Delhi and contributes about 60% of the total wastewater that gets discharged from Delhi into river Yamuna. The drain traverses a length of 51 km before joining river Yamuna, and is unlined for about 31 km along its initial stretch. In recent times, efforts have been made for limited withdrawal of groundwater from shallow aquifers in close vicinity of Najafgarh drain coupled with artificial recharge of groundwater. In this perspective, assessment of groundwater quality in shallow aquifers in vicinity of the Najafgarh drain of Delhi and hydrogeological characterization of adjacent areas were done. The groundwater quality was examined in perspective of Indian as well as World Health Organization’s drinking water standards. The spatial variation in groundwater quality was studied. The linkages between trace element occurrence and hydrochemical facies variation were also established. The shallow groundwater along Najafgarh drain is contaminated in stretches and the area is not suitable for large-scale groundwater development for drinking water purposes. 1. Introduction of this wastewater on the groundwater system is even more profound. There is considerable contam- The National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi ination of groundwater by industrial and domestic (figure 1) is one of the fast growing metropoli- effluents mostly carried through various drains tan cities in the world. It faces a massive problem (Singh 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Fractionation Study on Bed Sediments of River Yamuna, India C.K
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Water Research 38 (2004) 569–578 Metal fractionation study on bed sediments of River Yamuna, India C.K. Jain National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee 247 667, India Received 26 June 2002; received in revised form5 June 2003; accepted 22 October 2003 Abstract The pollution of aquatic ecosystem by heavy metals has assumed serious proportions due to their toxicity and accumulative behavior. The toxicity and fate of the water borne metal is dependent on its chemical form and therefore quantification of the different forms of metal is more meaningful than the estimation of its total metal concentrations. In this study fractionation of metal ions on bed sediments of River Yamuna has been studied to determine the eco-toxic potential of metal ions. The investigations suggest that copper have a tendency to remain associated with residual, reducible and carbonate fractions. The Risk Assessment Code reveal that about 30–50% of lead at most of the sites exist in exchangeable fraction while 30–50% of cadmium at almost all the sites is either exchangeable or carbonate bound and therefore comes under the high risk category and can easily enter the food chain. Most of the copper is in immobile fraction at Delhi while at other sites, a sizable portion (10–30%) is found in carbonate fraction thus posing medium risk for the aquatic environment. Fractionation pattern of zinc shows low to medium risk to aquatic environment. r 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Sequential extraction; Tessier scheme; Metals; Toxicity; Risk assessment Code; River Yamuna 1. Introduction principally controlled by pH, concentration and type of ligands and chelating agents, oxidation-state of the During recent years, the pollution of riverine system mineral components and the redox environment of the by heavy metals has attracted a lot of attention of the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Riverriver
    Reviving River Yamuna An Actionable Blue Print for a BLUEBLUE RIVERRIVER Edited by PEACE Institute Charitable Trust H.S. Panwar 2009 Reviving River Yamuna An Actionable Blue Print for a BLUE RIVER Edited by H.S. Panwar PEACE Institute Charitable Trust 2009 contents ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... v PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1 Fact File of Yamuna ................................................................................................. 9 A report by CHAPTER 2 Diversion and over Abstraction of Water from the River .............................. 15 PEACE Institute Charitable Trust CHAPTER 3 Unbridled Pollution ................................................................................................ 25 CHAPTER 4 Rampant Encroachment in Flood Plains ............................................................ 29 CHAPTER 5 There is Hope for Yamuna – An Actionable Blue Print for Revival ............ 33 This report is one of the outputs from the Ford Foundation sponsored project titled CHAPTER 6 Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan - An Example of Civil Society Action .......................... 39 Mainstreaming the river as a popular civil action ‘cause’ through “motivating actions for the revival of the people – river close links as a precursor to citizen’s mandated actions for the revival
    [Show full text]
  • E-Flow) in River Yamuna
    Environmental flow (E-Flow) in river Yamuna Context: The Hon’ble NGT in its judgment dated 13 January 2015 and through subsequent directions in OA No 6 of 2012 and 300 of 2013 given directions for the maintenance of requisite environmental flow in river Yamuna downstream of the barrage at Hathnikund in Haryana and at Okhla in Delhi so that there is enough fresh water flowing in the river till Agra for restoration of the river’s ecological functions. The Hon’ble Supreme Court had in W.P. ( C ) 537 of 1992 directed on 14 May 1999, that “a minimum flow of 10 cumecs (353 cusec) must be allowed to flow throughout the river Yamuna”. The report of the three member committee of MoWR, RD and GR on Assessment of Environmental Flows (E-Flows) has in March 2015 determined scientifically that E Flows as % of 90% dependable virgin flow at downstream Pashulok Barrage, Rishikesh on river Ganga should be 65.80%. It may be noted that the situation of river Yamuna at the Hathnikund barrage in Haryana is comparable to the situation at Rishikesh on river Ganga. In addition river Ganga at Rishikesh carries far more virgin flow in it as compared to leaner river Yamuna at Hathnikund. E – Flow in river Yamuna In view of the above it has been estimated that the E Flow in river Yamuna downstream of the barrage at Hathnikund should be no less than 2500 cusec (around 70% of the average minimum virgin flow of 3500 cusec reported at Hathnikund barrage during the leanest month of January).
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, RIVER DEVELOPMENT & GANGA REJUVENATION LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. †1015 ANSWERED ON 27.06.2019 CLEANLINESS OF YAMUNA RIVER †1015. SHRI MANOJ TIWARI Will the Minister of JAL SHAKTI be pleased to state: (a) the steps being taken by the Government to maintain cleanliness of Yamuna river flowing through the district headquarters, cities and industrial areas in the country; (b) whether the Government is going to make new provisions in this regard; and (c) if so, the details of the strategy being formulated for the same? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR JAL SHAKTI & SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT (SHRI RATTAN LAL KATARIA) (a) to (c) The cleaning of Rivers is a continuous process and this Ministry is supplementing the efforts of the States for checking the rising level of pollution of river Yamuna, a tributary of River Ganga, by providing financial assistance to different States of Haryana, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh in phased manner since 1993 under the Yamuna Action Plan (YAP). State-wise figure for numbers of project sanctioned and the estimated cost is as under:- Name of States Number of Projects Estimated Costs sanctioned (Rs. in crores). Himachal Pradesh 1 11.57 Haryana 2 217.87 Delhi 14 2421.00 Uttar Pradesh 8 1948.00 Total 25 4,598.44 In addition following initiatives have also been taken for cleanliness of river Yamuna: To remove the floating trash from the river surface trash skimmers have been deployed at Mathura & Delhi. A study for assessment of environmental flows in river Yamuna (from Hathinkund to Okhla barrage) is being carried out by National Institute of Hydrology, Rorkee.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Engineer (Yamuna) Okhla, New Delhi- 110 025
    PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT Project for Construction of Rubber Dam at 1.5 K.M Downstream of Taj Mahal on River Yamuna in Agra City Submitted to: The Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi April 2019 Submitted by: Chief Engineer (Yamuna) Okhla, New Delhi- 110 025 Irrigation and Water Resource Department, Uttar Pradesh PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................. 4 1.4 LOCATION & CONNECTIVITY............................................................................................. 5 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1 LAND REQUIREMENT ...................................................................................................... 12 2.2 RAW MATERIAL REQUIREMENT ..................................................................................... 13 2.3 MANPOWER REQUIREMENT .......................................................................................... 13 2.4 WATER REQUIREMENT ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • W Hit E Paper
    The Yamuna River: Life and Death of a Principal Waterway White Paper White Yamuna Action Parivar With a SpecialThe Focus Yamuna on River: Delhi Life and Death of a Principal Waterway 1 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Situation Overview 3 Sources of Pollution in the Yamuna River 4 Domestic Pollution 4 Discharges from Sewage Treatment Plants Into the River 6 Domestic Pollution Due to In-Stream Uses Of Water 6 Industrial Pollution 6 The Yamuna: Dry By the Hands of Mankind 7 Barrages Erected Within the Yamuna 7 The River, Quite Simply, Can’t Clean Itself 8 Water Leakages Significantly Add to the Problem 8 Policies Are Largely Ineffective 8 Part II: Focus on New Delhi 10 Ecological Flow 11 Untreated Sewage 11 The Yamuna as a Public Toilet 11 Garbage Dumping 11 Laundry at the Dhobi Ghats 12 Industrial Waste 12 Ash Immersion 12 Yamuna River Floodplains and Impact on Groundwater 13 Current Construction Over Floodplains 13 Poor Quality of Water Infrastructure in Delhi 13 Recharging Water at Floodplains 14 Use of Ground Wells in Delhi 15 The Effect of the Health of the Yamuna on the Health of the People of Delhi 15 Drinking Water Quality in Delhi 16 Diseases 16 Tainted Vegetables 17 The Yamuna River: Life and Death of a Principal Waterway Part III: India Responds Yamuna Action Plan I 18 2 YAP Activities Explained 18 Project Components 19 Delhi Project Components 19 Mixed Results 20 YAP Considered a Failure by Supreme Court, Environmental Minister 20 Factors Responsible for Underachievement 20 Failures in Community Toilet Complexes 22 Lessons Learned from
    [Show full text]