DOCSLIB.ORG

Jamie S. V. Milwaukee Public Schools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jamie S. V. Milwaukee Public Schools UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JAMIE S., et. al. individually and on behalf of the class, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 01-C-928 MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et. al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER FOLLOWING PHASE III I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ..........................................................................................................3 II. SUMMARY OF PHASE III.........................................................................................................8 A. Patricia Yahle ............................................................................................................................8 B. Kina K. .....................................................................................................................................11 C. Jamie S. ....................................................................................................................................12 D. Erin Goff ..................................................................................................................................13 E. Claudia Weaver Hendrickson ................................................................................................14 F. Audrey Potter...........................................................................................................................15 G. Kim Brizendine .......................................................................................................................15 H. Christine Shafer ......................................................................................................................15 I. Cynthia J. ..................................................................................................................................16 J. Georgette Rodriguez ................................................................................................................17 K. Melanie V.................................................................................................................................18 L. Bryan E.....................................................................................................................................19 M. Dr. Diana Rogers-Adkinson ..................................................................................................20 N. Jyran J......................................................................................................................................25 M. Dr. Eric Hartwig.....................................................................................................................26 N. Patricia Hall.............................................................................................................................29 O. Roxanne Mayeur.....................................................................................................................30 P. Sara Janacek ............................................................................................................................31 Q. Dr. Barbara Van Haren .........................................................................................................32 R. Dr. Cindy Walker....................................................................................................................34 S. Patricia Gill ..............................................................................................................................35 T. Stephanie Petska......................................................................................................................36 III. PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED REMEDY ..................................................................................37 IV. MPS’ PROPOSED REMEDY..................................................................................................40 V. ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................................42 A. Evaluation of Class Members ................................................................................................44 i. Independent Monitor...............................................................................................................44 ii. Hybrid IEP Team ...................................................................................................................47 iii. Determination if Purported Class Member is a Class Member ...........................................49 iv. Determination if Class Member is Entitled to Compensatory Services................................52 B. Eligibility ..................................................................................................................................58 C. Parent Advocates.....................................................................................................................61 D. Segregated Fund......................................................................................................................62 E. Dispute Resolution...................................................................................................................62 F. Named Plaintiffs ......................................................................................................................67 VI. DPI’S MOTION.........................................................................................................................69 2 VII. CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................................70 VIII. APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................72 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On September 13, 2001, the plaint iffs filed their com plaint, alleging violations under the Individuals with Disabilities E ducation Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (“IDEA”) and related state statutes, Wis. Stat. §§ 115.758, et seq. Upon the written consent of the parties to the exercise of jurisdiction by the m agistrate judge, the case was reassigned to this court on November 28, 2001. The court then issued its scheduling order establishing a tim e frame for pretrial discovery and for filing a motion seeking class cer tification. On November 7, 2002, the plaintiffs filed their m otion for class certification seeking to proceed on their claim s within the context of a class action. Th e defendants filed their opposition to the m otion, and on May 23, 2003, the court, in its Decision and Order Regarding Class Certification, directed the plaintiffs to submit an amended class certification motion because the court determined that a number of the plaintiffs’ claim s were subject to the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement, pursuant to the IDEA. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(l). The court concluded that some of the plaintiffs’ claims were not systemic in nature, identifying these as “post-determination” claims. The court reasoned that th ese claims were subject to adm inistrative exhaustion because they are indiv idual and substantive in nature and each alleged wrong could be potentially remedied through the administrative process outlined in the IDEA. The c ourt identified the other claims as “pre-determ ination” claims and concluded that these could be system ic or procedural in nature. As such, th ese claims had the potential for cl ass certification. The plaintiffs were required to f ile an am ended motion f or class ce rtification limited to the pre-determ ination claims. On June 23, 2003, the plaintiffs filed their amended motion for class certification, which sought class certification based upon the claims as narrowed by the court’s May 23, 2003 order. On 3 August 1, 2003, the court issued a second Decision and Or der, which directed the plaintiffs to file a second amended motion for class certification because, in the court’s opinion, both the plaintiffs and the defendants misconstrued the May 23, 2003, d ecision and order. Ultim ately, on November 14, 2003, this court entered its third Decision and Order, and at that tim e, defined the class as follows: Those students eligible for special educat ion services from the Milwaukee Public School System who are, have been or will be either denied or delay ed entry or participation in the processes which result in a properly constituted meeting between the IEP team and the parents or guardians of the student. At this point, a number of other motions were filed, including the Milwaukee Public Schools (“MPS”) defendants’ motion to dism iss certain claims as not typical of the class an d the plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of materials from the United States Department of Justice. The court ruled on these motions and then met with the parties to discuss appropriate notice to the class, and a discovery schedule for expert witn esses. After notice to the class was g iven and expert discovery completed, the court requested that the parties file a joint stipulated statement of facts, together with summaries of their res pective expert witnesses. Based upon the subm issions, and in an effort to avoid the tim e consuming process involved in summary judgm ent motions, the cour t decided to bifurcate trial pro ceedings, and first condu ct a court trial for exp ert witnesses. After some rescheduling, the cour t trial i nvolving expert witne sses (referred to as Phase I) commenced on October 18, 2005, and com pleted on November 2, 2005 (the trial did not run continuously during that period). The court heard from six experts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Education in Context 5 Circumstances
    SPECIAL EDUCATION 1 IN CONTEXT People, Concepts, and Perspectives e are all different. It is what makes us unique and interest- LEARNING OBJECTIVES ing human beings. Some differences are obvious, such as our height, the color of our hair, or the size of our nose. Other fea- W After reading Chapter 1, you should be able to: tures are not so readily discernible, such as our reading ability or politi- cal affiliation. Of course, some characteristics are more important than 1.1 Define exceptional children, disability, others. Greater significance is generally attached to intellectual ability handicapped, developmentally delayed, at than to shoe size. Fortunately, appreciation of individual differences is risk, and special education. one of the cornerstones of contemporary American society. Although most people would like to be thought of as “normal” or 1.2 Identify the thirteen disability categories “typical” (however defined), for millions of children and young adults, recognized by the federal government. this is not possible. They have been identified and labeled by schools, 1.3 Compare prevalence and incidence. social service agencies, and other organizations as exceptional, thus distribute requiring special educational services. This textbook is about these indi- 1.4 Describe the historical evolution of viduals who are exceptional. services for children and adults with You are about to embark on the study of a vibrant and rapidly changing or disabilities. field. Special education is an evolving profession with a long and rich heri- 1.5 Summarize the related services available tage. The past few decades in particular have been witness to remarkable to students with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Song As a Memory Device to Access and Recall Embedded Standards‐Based Academic Content
    Use of Song as a Memory Device to Access and Recall Embedded Standards‐Based Academic Content by Patricia Ogura A curriculum project submitted to Sonoma State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts In Education Special Education Emphasis _____________________________ __________ Emiliano Ayala, Ph.D., Chair Date _____________________________ __________ Stephen Cederborg, Ph.D. Date _____________________________ __________ Kelly Estrada, Ph.D. Date Copyright 2008 by Patricia Ogura ii AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTION OF MASTERʹS PROJECT Permission to reproduce this project in its entirety must be obtained from me. Permission to reproduce parts of this project must be obtained from me. ____________________________ ____________________________________ Date Signature Patricia Ogura iii Use of Song as a Memory Device to Access and Recall Embedded Standards‐Based Academic Content Project by Patricia Ogura ABSTRACT Purpose of the Project: The purpose of this project is to investigate whether music can be an effective means by which to present content in other subject areas; to ascertain current practice with regard to use of educational music in the elementary classroom, and to create a resource database aligning readily available educational music with California standards in the content areas. Procedure: A review of literature relevant to memory and recall through the use of music as a mediator was conducted. A survey was designed to ascertain current practice with regard to use of educational music in the classroom among colleagues. The survey also provided limited resources for exploration. Music was obtained and analyzed for subject area content, and aligned with California content standards. A database was designed and compiled.
    [Show full text]
  • Countering Deficit Thinking About Neurodiversity Among General Education Teacher Candidates: a Case Discussion Approach
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Faculty Research, Scholarly, and Creative Activity 1-1-2020 Countering Deficit Thinking About Neurodiversity Among General Education Teacher Candidates: A Case Discussion Approach Grinell Smith San Jose State University, [email protected] Colette Rabin San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/faculty_rsca Part of the Disability and Equity in Education Commons, and the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Recommended Citation Grinell Smith and Colette Rabin. "Countering Deficit Thinking About Neurodiversity Among General Education Teacher Candidates: A Case Discussion Approach" The CCTE SPAN 2020 Research Monograph (2020): 119-125. This Contribution to a Book is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research, Scholarly, and Creative Activity by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The CCTE SPAN 2020 Research Monograph Published by the California Council on Teacher Education Containing 14 Research Articles Originally Accepted for Presentation at CCTE SPAN 2020 CCTE SPAN 2020 Research Monograph Published by the California Council on Teacher Education Officers of the California Council on Teacher Education: Eric Engdahl, President (California State University, East Bay) Heidi Stevenson, President Elect (University of the Pacific) Kimberly White-Smith, Vice President
    [Show full text]
  • The OCE Lamron, 1951-11-03
    WOLVES READY FOR MOUNTAINEERS Eleven To Play Final Home,Tilt ~ I Today's Homecoming game will see 11 members of the local grid squad playing their final game be• ' fore a home crowd. Although one '1 contest remains on the OCE slate, it .. 1 will be played at Vancouver, B.C., where the Wolves meet the Univer­ sity of British COlumbia. The list of seniors is headed by a pair of four-year lettermen. The duo comprises the aerial punch of the 1951 Wolfpack. They are Quar- terbaek Roger Dasch and Left End 1 Lyle Hay. The three-year men are Bob Downing, capable center; Bill Palmquist, hard-running fullback; I. and Dick Vanderzanden, who forti- fies the OCE defensive line. This 1951 version- of the OCE grid machine will be trying to wrapup their second consecutive conference championship. Front row (from Other lettermen who are seeing the left) Jim Pulsifer, Bud Michaels, wally Kent, George McGreer, Blaekie Deaver, Bill Arnold, and Roger Dasch. Second row, Leroy their final year are two-striper Le­ Coleman, Darrel Davi!;, Bill Blackburn, Bill Palmquist, Arnold Sittser, John \ LaFountain, Dick Peterson, Joe Partlow, Charlie Pinion and Bob roy Coleman, a capable field general, Downing. Third row, Coach Bill McArthur, Don. Wickstrand, Allen Posey, Don Boyd, Leroy Vanover, Bob Norton, Ralph Wilcox, Gaylon and alternate fullback George Watt.a. Huff, Lyle Hay and Line Coach John Chamberlain. Back row, Jack Pomeroy, Harry Russel, Jim Hastings, Ray Hubbard, Bill Power, Jim Several newcomers and non-letter­ Colleran, Les Holley, Jim Dyal and Bill McGinn. -Photo by Spear men are also on the graduate list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Assessment for the Inclusive General Music Classroom
    THE VALUE OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE INCLUSIVE GENERAL MUSIC CLASSROOM Liberty University By Mary Elizabeth Quigley A MASTER’S THESIS PRESENTED IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN MUSIC EDUCATION Liberty University July 3rd, 2020 THE VALUE OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE INCLUSIVE GENERAL MUSIC CLASSROOM By Mary Elizabeth Quigley A Master’s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Music Education Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia July 3rd, 2020 Approved by: Dr. Kathryn L. Wert Dr. Andrew T. Phillips Abstract This project contains an analysis of the current inclusion and assessment practices of the middle school (7th and 8th grade) general music classroom. There are many studies concerning inclusion of students with special needs and the importance of assessments in teaching music. However, there are very few studies that connect assessment techniques with inclusion, demonstrating that music teachers are teaching to each student’s ability. This study used the case study methodology in the qualitative approach with teacher interviews, surveys, and several classroom observations to analyze the data. The data was coded, and names of people and the school district were anonymized to protect the privacy of those involved. After the data was analyzed, the best strategies for assessment as well as how to use those assessments were provided. The purpose of this project is to present findings on how methods of assessment can increase the success of all students in the inclusive general music classroom. Keywords: inclusion, differentiation practices, summative assessment, formative assessment, special needs, general music.
    [Show full text]
  • Parent/Student Handbook
    Parent/Student Handbook North Ridgeville City Schools Main Office 5490 Mills Creek Lane North Ridgeville, OH 44039 Main Office: 440-327-4444 Fax: 440-327-9774 Transportation: 440-327-4422 Special Education: 440-353-1136 6/6/2014 mgs TABLE OF CONTENTS MISSION STATEMENT ............................................................................................................ 1 VISION STATEMENT ............................................................................................................... 1 ALMA MATER ........................................................................................................................ 1 FIGHT SONG .......................................................................................................................... 1 OUR FACILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 2 BUILDING STARTING AND ENDING TIMES .............................................................................. 2 SECTION I: LEGAL NOTIFICATIONS ......................................................................................... 3 EQUAL EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 THE FAMILY EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVACY ACT (FERPA) .......................................................................................................................... 3 COMPULSORY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AGE
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Cognitive Effects of Music Education on Special Needs Students
    EFFECTS OF MUSIC EDUCATION 1 The Social and Cognitive Effects of Music Education on Special Needs Students Sarah Deacon A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2021 EFFECTS OF MUSIC EDUCATION 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. _______________________________ Rebecca Watson, D.M.A. Thesis Chair _______________________________ Kathryn Wert, D.A. Committee Member ________________________________ James H. Nutter, D.A. Honors Director ________________________________ May 3, 2021 EFFECTS OF MUSIC EDUCATION 3 Abstract With the adoption of inclusion policies such as the Every Student Succeeds Act, it has become increasingly important for students to have equal access to a quality education in all subject areas. In the last five years, more students with special needs are becoming involved in music education programs within their schools. The purpose of this thesis is to examine how the involvement of special needs students in music education programs may provide these students with cognitive and social benefits that affect conditions surrounding their disabilities. The results of various research studies show that special needs students involved in Music Education, whether in an ensemble or private instrument study, have experienced advantages due to their musical studies. Music Education can provide special needs students with increased confidence and advanced social and cognitive skills. EFFECTS OF MUSIC EDUCATION 4 The Social and Cognitive Effects of Music Education on Special Needs Students The United States Census Bureau has found that about 56.7 million people–19 percent of the population -- have a either a physical or mental disability, and that number is steadily increasing with time.1 There has been a corresponding increase of special needs students within the school systems of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Education 2020 National Blue Ribbon Schools Program
    U.S. Department of Education 2020 National Blue Ribbon Schools Program [X] Public or [ ] Non-public For Public Schools only: (Check all that apply) [ ] Title I [ ] Charter [ ] Magnet[ ] Choice Name of Principal Ms. Laura Avakians (Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., etc.) (As it should appear in the official records) Official School Name PS 94 David D Porter Elementary School (As it should appear in the official records) School Mailing Address 41-77 Little Neck Parkway (If address is P.O. Box, also include street address.) City Little Neck State NY Zip Code+4 (9 digits total) 11363-1738 County Queens Telephone (718) 423-8491 Fax (718) 423-8531 Web site/URL http://www.ps94.org E-mail [email protected] I have reviewed the information in this application, including the eligibility requirements on page 2 (Part I- Eligibility Certification), and certify, to the best of my knowledge, that it is accurate. Date____________________________ (Principal’s Signature) Name of Superintendent*_Ms. Danielle [email protected] (Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., Other) District Name New York City Geographic District #26 Tel. (718) 631-6943 I have reviewed the information in this application, including the eligibility requirements on page 2 (Part I- Eligibility Certification), and certify, to the best of my knowledge, that it is accurate. Date (Superintendent’s Signature) Name of School Board President/Chairperson Ms. Ariel Chen (Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., Other) I have reviewed the information in this application, including the eligibility requirements on page 2 (Part I- Eligibility Certification), and certify, to the best of my knowledge, that it is accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Special Education for a New Century
    Rethinking Special Education for a New Century • Individualized Education Program • Accountability • Accommodation • Due Process Hearing • Section 504 • Litigation • Discipline • Inclusion Learning Disabilities • Individuals with Education Act • Least Restrictive Environment • Free Appropriate Public Education • Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham, and Charles R. Hokanson, Jr., Editors With a Preface by Madeleine Will Published by the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute May 2001 Table of Contents Table of Contents Foreword Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham, and Charles R. Hokanson, Jr. v Preface Madeleine Will . ix Chapter Highlights . xi Special Education History and Issues 1. The Evolution of the Federal Role Tyce Palmaffy . 1 2. Time to Make Special Education Special Again Wade F. Horn and Douglas Tynan . 23 3. Effectiveness and Accountability (Part 1): The Compliance Model Patrick J. Wolf and Bryan C. Hassel . 53 4. The Moral Foundations of Special Education Law Mark Kelman . 77 5. Special but Unequal: Race and Special Education Matthew Ladner and Christopher Hammons . 85 Special Education in Practice 6. Special Education at Coles Elementary School Robert Cullen . 111 7. How Special Education Policy Affects Districts Anna B. Duff . 135 8. How Federal Special Education Policy Affects Schooling in Virginia Frederick M. Hess and Frederick J. Brigham . 161 9. The Rising Costs of Special Education in Massachusetts: Causes and Effects Sheldon Berman, Perry Davis, Ann Koufman-Frederick, and David Urion . 183 Progressive Policy Institute v Thomas B. Fordham Foundation iii Table of Contents 10. Nasty, Brutish and Often Not Very Short: The Attorney Perspective on Due Process Kevin J. Lanigan, Rose Marie L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fantasizing Disability: Representation of Loss and Limitation in Popular Television and Film
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-19-2014 12:00 AM Fantasizing Disability: Representation of loss and limitation in Popular Television and Film Jeffrey M. Preston The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Sharon Sliwinski The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Media Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Jeffrey M. Preston 2014 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, and the Television Commons Recommended Citation Preston, Jeffrey M., "Fantasizing Disability: Representation of loss and limitation in Popular Television and Film" (2014). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 2386. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/2386 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FANTASIZING DISABILITY: REPRESENTATION OF LOSS AND LIMITATION IN POPULAR TELEVISION AND FILM (Monograph) by Jeffrey Preston Graduate Program in Media Studies A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Media Studies The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Jeffrey Preston 2014 Abstract Most media texts currently being developed with disabled characters are crafted by individuals who are nondisabled and, as such, are based on what the nondisabled think it would be like to be disabled—a perception that is informed by the fantasy of disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    Stories out of school: Literacies of the academy, the community, and the home. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Moneyhun, Clyde Andrew. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 23:35:32 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187492 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Music Education for Students with Disabilities: a Guide for Teachers, Parents, and Students
    The Corinthian Volume 18 Article 6 June 2017 Music Education for Students with Disabilities: A Guide for Teachers, Parents, and Students Kaitlin A. Merck Georgia College and State University Ryan M. Johnson Georgia College and State University Follow this and additional works at: https://kb.gcsu.edu/thecorinthian Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Gifted Education Commons, Other Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons, and the Special Education and Teaching Commons Recommended Citation Merck, Kaitlin A. and Johnson, Ryan M. (2017) "Music Education for Students with Disabilities: A Guide for Teachers, Parents, and Students," The Corinthian: Vol. 18 , Article 6. Available at: https://kb.gcsu.edu/thecorinthian/vol18/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Research at Knowledge Box. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Corinthian by an authorized editor of Knowledge Box. Music Education for students with disabilities: A guide for teachers, parents and students The inclusive classroom has become a large part of the American education system and has implications for the music classroom. Bryant, Bryant and Smith (2016) described the inclusive classroom as the “educational setting in which students with disabilities have access to the general education curriculum, participate in school activities alongside other students without disabilities, and attend their neighborhood school” (p. 33). Students with disabilities should find a natural home in the inclusive music classroom, because every student can perform music to some degree. Though music’s expressiveness allows limitless possibilities, some teachers are uncomfortable making requisite modifications for various reasons.
    [Show full text]