DOCSLIB.ORG

Elizabeth Warren's Housing Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elizabeth Warren's Housing Policy ELIZABETH WARREN’S HOUSING POLICY American Housing and Economic Mobility Act Full Bill Text Reintroduced - March 13, 2019 (See our blog about it here) DATA FOR PROGRESS Data for Progress is keeping a running tab of housing policy proposals for announced or likely 2020 Presidential contenders. This is not a horse race, process-story exercise - we’ll be providing play-by-play policy analysis, ideological context, and suggestions to improve candidates’ policies, to help both campaigns and voters get to the best American housing policy. OVERVIEW community groups that will rehab and sell to owner-occupants. Warren’s updated housing proposal retains the three major focuses from her 2018 ► Adds $3.6 billion in new capital plan and adds an important fourth focus funding for public housing - cracking down on institutional investors’ authorities – this is a key addition ability to buy single-family homes backed by from the previous bill and is an the federal government. The three original amount intended to fully fund public focuses - funding the construction of more housing preservation for one year. private affordable housing for extremely ► Creates incentive fund for local low-income households, combating cities and towns to remove exclusionary zoning that racially and exclusionary zoning policies that economically segregates communities, and prevent affordable and workforce addressing decades of racism in federal housing (also known as apartment housing policy - remain largely intact with bans), to encourage building more some promising additional details added. homes with better transit accessibility. Key Points: ► Adds renter protections to the incentive funds for local cities and ► Dedicates $470 billion over ten towns, including rent stabilization, years to provide states with bans on no-cause evictions, and right funding to build, rehabilitate, or to counsel for tenants facing eviction. preserve private affordable housing for extremely low-income (ELI) ► Extends Fair Housing Act households over the next ten years protections to LBGTQ communities, through the Housing Trust Fund, low-income families of color, Native a program started by the Obama American populations, and Section 8 Administration in 2016 and the (housing assistance) recipients. Capital Magnet Fund, a private capital matching program. The updated ► Creates a new down-payment bill retains the same basic funding assistance program for first- structure, which has become the time homebuyers in low-income benchmark for the 2020 race. communities and communities of color and expands Community ► Cracks down on real-estate owned Reinvestment Act powers of (REO) mortgages and speculation. enforcement and institution eligibility. Calls for the Federal Housing Administration to provide new ► Restores estate tax rates to Bush assistance for keeping families in Administration levels and increases distressed homes and to sell no less rates for $10 million estates. Moody’s than 75% of single-family properties estimates that this would cover the that it acquires through foreclosure cost of the bill. to owner-occupant buyers or to ELIZABETH WARREN’S HOUSING POLICY 2 WHAT IT REVEALS 75% of single-family properties that it acquires through foreclosure to owner- ABOUT WARREN: occupant buyers or to community This updated bill is vintage Elizabeth Warren groups that will rehab and sell to - deadly serious about economic inequality, owner-occupants. It goes as far as displaying nerdy insights into the origins of giving these types of entities right of stagnation and poverty, and ultimately inclined first refusal at any housing auction. to rewrite the rules of capitalism to make it Another key section guarantees new work, rather than replace it root-and-branch. assistance to keeping families in The focus on increasing homeownership rates distressed homes in the first place. for low-income families of color reflects Warren’s ► Throws real money, real measures, and pre-politics academic focus on bankruptcy and real accountability at the problems. inequality. Her focus on racial and social justice in housing indicates an earnest interest in the $470 billion would be a serious unique economic plights of people of color infusion of money for low-income and other oppressed groups. And her interest housing, resulting in over 3 million new in using current structures of public-private homes. partnership to fund affordable housing conveys reformist instincts. She also demonstrates the A $10 billion incentive program to ability to respond to feedback and to grow from end apartment bans offers a good- it. This bill includes several tweaks that we called faith attempt at ending exclusionary for our in original analysis and it has particularly zoning practices that could further embraced our call to crack down on Wall Street produce significantly more workforce speculation in single-family homes. housing. The updated bill has added stronger renter protections as qualifying policies to earn those WHAT’S GOOD: incentives. These include rent control/ stabilization, eviction prevention, and ► Faces the core problems head- right-to-counsel as qualifications to on. Warren’s proposal offers serious, receive the additional funding. thoughtful efforts to address the core problems facing the American housing By including some funding for public supply – a shortfall of affordable homes, housing that was absent from her especially to the poorest Americans; 2018 proposal, Warren is at least widespread, persistent housing acknowledging the importance of discrimination; and yawning racial gaps publicly owned homes. $3.6 billion in in access to homeownership and the new capital funding for public housing economic security and mobility it has authorities is not a lot of money (the historically provided. New York City Housing Authority, the nation’s largest collection of publicly The biggest update in the bill is the owned homes at 176,000 has a capital focus on cracking down on real- budget gap of $32 billion alone) but estate owned (REO) mortgages. It it offers the program a foothold on calls for the FHA to sell no less than the national stage for much needed attention. ELIZABETH WARREN’S HOUSING POLICY 3 Expanding Fair Housing Act WHAT NEEDS WORK: protections is the most time-tested way to address long-standing ► Affordable housing investment is still discrimination, and Warren’s bill too small. Although Warren’s proposal thoughtfully includes communities presents a marked expansion in state- most often facing housing funded low-income housing, it still falls discrimination today. short of America’s housing needs. The U.S. currently lacks some 7 million homes The bill’s focus on racial needed to house low-income individuals homeownership gaps is quietly one and families.1 A growth of 3 million new of the most radical proposals of the homes for this population would go a bill. The racism built in directly and long way toward addressing the problem, indirectly to 20th-century federal but it still would meet less than half the housing policy is well documented need (not even accounting for likely and has had a massive impact on growth in the low-income population). racial and wealth inequality. Very few previous proposals have attempted ► Incentives to undo exclusionary zoning to meaningful address this and help may be too soft. While Warren deserves communities that have been impacted credit for attempting to unravel the by it. deeply entrenched exclusionary zoning in more affluent cities and suburbs, the The updated bill importantly outlines incentives she has created may prove new categories of eligibility for insufficient to change the behavior of homeownership assistance that the worst offenders. When spread across more explicitly target homeowners the country, $10 billion in incentive of color who experienced block grants may simply not be enough contemporary racial discrimination. to compel communities to confront They now include victims of subprime their powerful NIMBY elements. This is mortgages, residents displaced especially true of the most exclusionary through natural disasters, and HUD- communities - affluent places that defined areas of high poverty, high- seldom struggle to fund their parks or minority populations. schools. Earnestly attempts to pay for itself - ► ► Down-payment assistance program with winning politics. Warren’s pay-for risks excluding already-displaced is both serious and poetic – taxing the people. Much like her attempt to unwind estates of the extremely wealthy to pay for exclusionary zoning, Warren’s down- homes for the middle class and poor. payment program is a smart response to a pervasive problem but could be partly ELIZABETH WARREN’S HOUSING POLICY 4 undermined by imperfect construction. WHAT WE WOULD ADD: It is fantastic that Warren is focusing on corrective measures for formerly redlined ► More funding for affordable housing. areas yet by establishing a last-four-years Doubling the $470 billion investment residency qualification, the proposal may would likely offer enough financial unintentionally exclude families that have backing to adequately address the total already been displaced from gentrifying housing shortfall. We were hoping to see communities. The updated bill addresses more funding included in the updated some of this by targeting a wider set of proposal, but Warren still gets credit for victims that are likely to be minorities, but creating the benchmark that others are still doesn’t have a clear answer for those catching up to. displaced by gentrification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St. Paul's Episcopal Church Broad Street 36 03 40 N 76 36 31 W
    St. Paul’s Episcopal Church Broad Street 36 03 40 N 76 36 31 W W. D. Holmes July 22, 1842 April 26, 1908 Father Harriet Holmes March 11, 1842 July 29, 1883 Mother Eligible stone In Memory of M.J. Hollowell Wife of W.H. Hollowell November 15, 1840 January 5, 1883 In Memory of Jessie Hollowell Son of W.H. Hollowell Wife ______ Hollowell In Memory of Infant son of W.H. and M.J. Hollowell Burnice McCoy April 1, 1899 January 7, 1901 Elizabeth Arnold Jackson Wife of Jacob Wool December 21, 1852 June 17, 1914 Asleep in Jesus Penelopy McCoy August 20, 1839 May 15, 1915 James McCoy August 20, 1827 April 14, 1892 Patty June McCoy June 22, 1861 August 27, 1888 Jacob Wool August 27, 1830 December 6, 1900 In Loving Remembrance of Annie B. Wool November 8, 1870 September 5, 1887 Daughter of Jacob and Elizabeth Wool A faithful Christian devoted friend, none knew her but to love her. Asleep in Jesus. Eligible ground marker Elizabeth M.W. Moore Daughter of Augustus Minten and Elizabeth Warren Moore March 3, 1878 February 28, 1936 Judge Augustus M. Moore December 17, 1841 April 24, 1902 Our father Mary E. Moore August 11, 1839 February 12, 1903 William Edward Anderson Thompson August 6, 1869 February 16, 1924 The Lord is my rock and my fortress. God is Love. Walker Anderson Thompson October 18, 1866 February 15, 1891 Erected in loving remembrance by his aunt Mary Read Anderson. John Thompson September 6, 1860 February 6, 1879 Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Is Only Leading Dem to Top Trump in Ohio, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Former V.P
    Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director (203) 535-6203 Rubenstein Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JULY 25, 2019 BIDEN IS ONLY LEADING DEM TO TOP TRUMP IN OHIO, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; FORMER V.P. HAS BIG LEAD IN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY Former Vice President Joseph Biden leads President Donald Trump 50 – 42 percent in the critical swing state of Ohio, the only leading Democratic candidate to top the Republican incumbent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. The other leading Democratic contenders each are locked in a dead heat with President Trump, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University Poll finds: 46 percent for Trump to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders with 45 percent; Trump at 46 percent to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 45 percent; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and California Sen. Kamala Harris; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg; 44 percent for Trump to 43 percent for New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. Women, black voters and independent voters give Biden his lead in the matchup with Trump. Biden leads 53 – 40 percent among women, as men are split with 46 percent for Biden and 45 percent for Trump. White voters are divided, with 48 percent for Trump and 45 percent for Biden. Black voters go Democratic 84 – 8 percent. Independent voters go to Biden 55 – 32 percent. Republicans back Trump 86 – 10 percent as Biden leads 96 – 2 percent among Democrats. “Former Vice President Joseph Biden calls himself a blue-collar guy. With Ohio certainly a blue-collar state, it is no surprise he is the Democrat who runs best against President Donald Trump and is solidly ahead in the Democratic primary in the Buckeye State,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
    [Show full text]
  • March 18, 2020 Senator Elizabeth Warren United States Senate 309
    March 18, 2020 Senator Elizabeth Warren United States Senate 309 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Warren: On behalf of the Massachusetts Medical Society, representing over 25,000 physicians, residents, and medical students in the Commonwealth, I write to thank you for your letter urging Secretary Azar and Assistant Secretary Kadlec to respond to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health’s request for personal protective equipment (PPE) from the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS). Massachusetts is currently facing an imminent, dire shortage of PPE, posing a substantial risk to our front-line health care workers and impeding the medical community’s collective ability to effectively respond to the crisis. While we greatly appreciate the diligent efforts of our Massachusetts Department of Public Health, the shortage of PPE is becoming a critical threat, especially as hospitalizations for COVID-19 patients have increased dramatically, in some instances quadrupling overnight. It’s not just hospital systems that are facing shortages. The Medical Society continues to receive increasingly distressed inquiries from smaller physician practices as well. In one such instance, a small physician practice on the North Shore has the testing capability to address high demand for testing among sick patients but is down to three N95 masks. Because of this shortage in PPE, this practice is not able to maximally utilize the test kits they possess while also keeping their staff safe from potential exposure. While meaningful efforts have been made to preserve existing supplies, through expansion of the use of telehealth and mandated cancellation of non-essential elective procedures, additional PPE will no doubt remain critical.
    [Show full text]
  • August 10, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell The
    August 10, 2020 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Charles E. Schumer Senate Majority Leader Senate Minority Leader Room S-230, U.S. Capitol Room S-221, U.S. Capitol Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Richard Shelby The Honorable Patrick Leahy Chairman Vice Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee Senate Appropriations Committee Room S-128, U.S. Capitol Room S-128, U.S. Capitol Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Leader McConnell, Leader Schumer, Chairman Shelby, and Vice Chairman Leahy: As Congress considers additional relief in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we urge you to prioritize nutrition programs for older adults. Specifically, we request that the next COVID-19 relief package include $1.1 billion in funding for Older Americans Act (OAA) programs, including $750 million for OAA Nutrition Services, which critically support the delivery of nutritious meals to older adults throughout the country. The COVID-19 pandemic is disproportionately impacting older adults. With the closure of congregate meal sites and the steep increase in newly homebound older adults, there is now a higher demand for OAA Programs, such as Home Delivered Meals and other community-based supportive services. According to the National Association of Area Agencies on Aging (n4a), 93 percent of Area Agencies on Aging (AAA) have reported serving more clients since the pandemic began, and 69 percent of AAAs saw an increase in demand for their supportive services. In addition, Meals on Wheels America members are serving an average of 77 percent more meals to 47 percent more seniors since March, with virtually all programs having seen the cost of providing services increase.
    [Show full text]
  • April 23, 2019 April Omni B Survey, Data for Progress Items
    To: Data for Progress From: YouGov Blue Date: April 23, 2019 April Omni B survey, Data for Progress Items [primaryvote] Next year, there will be a presidential $state_election_text in [state] to select nominees for president for the Democratic and Republican parties. Will you... <1> Definitely [vote or participate] <2> Probably [vote or participate] <3> Maybe [vote or participate] <4> Probably not [vote or participate] <5> Definitely not [vote or participate] [partyvote] And if you were to [vote or participate], would you [vote or participate] in the... <1> Democratic [primary or caucus] <2> Republican [primary or caucus] <3 fixed> Not sure [CHOICE20] Thinking about the 2020 Democratic presidential [primary or caucus] in your state, which candidate or candidates are you considering voting for? Select all that apply. <1> Joe Biden <2> Bernie Sanders <3> Kamala Harris <4> Beto O’Rourke <5> Cory Booker <6> Amy Klobuchar <7> Elizabeth Warren <8> John Hickenlooper <9> Kirsten Gillibrand <10> John Delaney <11> Julián Castro <12> Stacey Abrams <13> Tammy Baldwin <14> Bill DeBlasio <15> Tulsi Gabbard <16> Pete Buttigieg <17> Jay Inslee <18> Tim Ryan <19> Seth Moulton <20> Eric Swalwell <21> Andrew Yang <22> Marianne Williamson <23> Mike Gravel <24> Steve Bullock <25> Michael Bennet <26> Wayne Messam <27 fixed> None of these [RANK20] And of those candidates, please ranK them from the candidate you most prefer to the candidate you would least prefer. <1 (if selected in CHOICE20)> Joe Biden <2 (if selected in CHOICE20)> > Bernie Sanders <3 (if selected
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of 47 Members of the United States Senate As Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners
    Nos. 19-840 & 19-1019 IN THE CALIFORNIA, ET AL., Petitioners / Cross-Respondents, v. TEXAS, ET AL., Respondents / Cross-Petitioners. On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit BRIEF OF 47 MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS ADAM S. GERSHENSON ELIZABETH B. PRELOGAR ELIZABETH A. TRAFTON Counsel of Record COOLEY LLP COOLEY LLP 500 Boylston Street 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Boston, MA 02116 Washington, DC 20004 (202) 842-7800 SAMANTHA A. KIRBY [email protected] COOLEY LLP 3175 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 NATALIE D. VERNON COOLEY LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Counsel for Amici Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STATEMENT OF INTEREST ..................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 3 I. SECTION 5000A IS SEVERABLE FROM THE REST OF THE ACA. ................................ 4 A. A Straightforward Application Of Severability Principles Demonstrates Section 5000A Is Severable. ..................... 5 B. Respondents’ Arguments Against Severability Are Unavailing. .................. 14 II. CONGRESS DID NOT INTEND THE DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES THAT WOULD FLOW FROM REPEAL OF THE ACA. ............................................................... 18 A. Invalidating the ACA Would Leave Millions Uninsured and Millions More with Lower Quality Coverage. ...... 19 B. Invalidating the ACA Would Inject Chaos into the Health Care Market and Impose Substantial Costs. ................ 21 C. Invalidating the ACA Would Disproportionately Harm Americans Who Already Face Barriers to Care. ....... 25 D. Invalidating the ACA Would Nullify Congress’s Informed Policy Decision. ............................................... 29 CONCLUSION .......................................................... 30 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock, 480 U.S. 678 (1987) ........................................ 5, 6, 7, 8 Ayotte v.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus January 2020 Dem Primary
    Democratic Primary Update Verified Voter Omnibus Survey N=474 Democratic or Democratic Leaning Likely Primary Voters January 20 - January 23, 2020 X1 Key Findings • Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders are leading the field with a 3 point margin between the two candidates: Biden fell 11 points since December to 26% of the likely Democratic vote and Sanders gained 9 points to 23% of the likely Democratic vote. • Among likely Democratic voters with a verified history of voting in primary elections, Biden received 26% of the vote to Sanders’ 22%. • Mike Bloomberg also showed strong momentum since December, with Bloomberg gaining 7 points to 13% of the likely Democratic vote. Elizabeth Warren earned 10% and Pete Buttigieg earned7% of the likely Democratic vote. • Biden’s lead against top candidates in direct match ups narrowed across the board since December, and narrowed most significantly against Warren, where Biden led 48-43, from 59-29 in December. • Biden led Sanders 54-38 in a direct match up this month and led Buttigieg 56-32. 2 Methodology • Using a voter file-matched online panel, we surveyed n=1,000 registered voters across the country from January 20 - January 23, 2019, with a sample of 474 Democratic or Democratic-leaning Independent Likely Voters. • With our eight monthly tracking survey on the 2020 political landscape, we were able to track changes in the attitudes and behaviors of key voters since our last survey of verified Democratic or Democratic-leaning Independent Likely Voters from December 9 - December 14, 2019 3 The Democratic Primary 4 Biden, Sanders Neck & Neck, Bloomberg at 13% Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University/Boston Globe
    SUPRC/Boston Globe August 2019 FINAL NH DEM PRIMARY AUGUST Region: (N=500) n % West/North ------------------------------------------------------- 131 26.20 Central ------------------------------------------------------------ 127 25.40 Hillsborough ------------------------------------------------------ 137 27.40 Rockingham ------------------------------------------------------ 105 21.00 INTRO SECTION> Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk (SUFF-ick) University and I would like to get your opinions on some questions about the upcoming Democratic Primary in New Hampshire. Would you be willing to spend five minutes answering some brief questions? (quota) A. Are you a resident of New Hampshire? (N=500) n % Yes ----------------------------------------------------------------- 500 100.00 1. Gender (N=500) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 224 44.80 Female ------------------------------------------------------------ 276 55.20 2. Thinking about the Democratic Primary for President coming up in six months, how likely are you to vote in the Democratic Primary – would you say you are very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not at all likely to vote in the Democratic Primary? (N=500) n % Very likely--------------------------------------------------------- 448 89.60 Somewhat likely -------------------------------------------------- 52 10.40 3. Are you currently enrolled as a Democrat, Republican, or Undeclared/Independent? (N=500) n % Democrat ---------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Anselm College Survey Center April 2019 Poll Announced/Potential Democratic Presidential Candidate Name Recognition and Ballot Test Results
    SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE SURVEY CENTER APRIL 2019 POLL ANNOUNCED/POTENTIAL DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NAME RECOGNITION AND BALLOT TEST RESULTS These results are from the Saint Anselm College Survey Center poll based on interviews with 698 randomly- selected registered voters in the state of New Hampshire. Interviews were conducted by landline and cellular phone between April 3 rd and April 8 th , 2019. The overall survey has a margin of sampling error of 3.7% with a confidence interval of 95%; the margin of sampling error for questions specific to the 1 st and 2 nd Congressional Districts is 5.3% and 5.1% respectively; the margin of sampling error for questions specific to the Democratic and Republican Presidential Primaries are 5.4% and 6.0% respectively. Data are weighted based on a voter demographic model derived from historical voting patterns, but are not weighted by party registration or party identification. 326 respondents that indicated their intention to vote in the Democratic Presidential Primary were asked for their impression of 14 announced and potential candidates for the Democratic nomination for President. The names were presented in random order. Respondents were then asked to select a candidate for whom they would vote. “Now I’m now going to read a list of people that have announced that they are running for the Democratic Presidential nomination, or have indicated that they are strongly considering it. After each name, I would like you to tell me if you have a favorable impression, unfavorable impression, or no opinion of that person. If you have never heard of them, please let me know.” “If the presidential primary election were held today, which candidate would you vote for?” New Hampshire Institute of Politics Executive Director Neil Levesque summarized the results, saying, “Joe Biden continues to show strength in New Hampshire, as 23% of Democratic Primary voters surveyed indicated that if the NH Primary were held today, they would vote for Biden, followed by 16% for Bernie Sanders, 11% for Pete Buttigieg and 9% for Elizabeth Warren.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Democratic Primary Election Survey 2020
    TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY ELECTION SURVEY 2020 Vote Intention in the Race for the Presidential Nomination 1 Texas Democratic Primary Election Survey 2020 Vote Intention in the Race for the Presidential Nomination The University of Houston Hobby School of Public Affairs conducted an online survey among likely Democratic primary voters in Texas to identify the leading candidates for the Democratic nominees for president and U.S. senator, opinions of salient policies and approval ratings of key national and state politicians. The survey was fielded between February 6 and February 18 with 1,352 YouGov respondents, resulting in a confidence interval of +/-2.7%. The results of this survey will be presented in three separate reports. This report focuses primarily on the vote intention in the Texas Democratic presidential primary election. Subsequent reports will concentrate on the vote intention in the Texas Democratic senate primary election and on the position of Texas Democratic primary voters on a range of policies, especially related to the Green New Deal and health care, and the evaluation of national and state politicians. 1. What Democratic Primary Voters Want Most in a Nominee As shown in Table 1, a substantial majority (57.1%) of Democratic primary voters believe that the most important trait of a nominee is being able to defeat President Donald Trump in November 2020. A little less than one-third (31.8%) stated that the most important trait of a nominee was agreeing with them on most issues, with only 11.1% listing having the right experience as the most important trait for a nominee.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 03 03 Presidential Primary Results
    Town of Sterling 2020 03 03 Presidential Primary OFFICIAL RESULTS.xlsx PRECINCT 1 PRECINCT 2 TOTALS DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE Deval Patrick 10 2 12 Amy Klobuchar 17 22 39 Elizabeth Warren 144 158 302 Michael Bennet 0 1 1 Michael R. Bloomberg 92 104 196 Tulsi Gabbard 4 12 16 Cory Booker 0 2 2 Julian Castro 0 0 0 Tom Steyer 7 11 18 Bernie Sanders 240 248 488 Joseph R. Biden 312 292 604 John K. Delaney 0 0 0 Andrew Yang 1 3 4 Pete Buttigieg 49 42 91 Marianne Williamson 1 0 1 No Preference 0 1 1 Write-ins 0 1 1 Blanks 0 1 1 TOTAL 877 900 1,777 STATE COMMITTEE MAN Patrick G. Haverty 565 613 1,178 Write-ins 1 1 2 Blanks 311 286 597 TOTAL 877 900 1,777 STATE COMMITTEE WOMAN Natalie Higgins 597 634 1,231 Write-ins 0 1 1 Blanks 280 265 545 TOTAL 877 900 1,777 TOWN COMMITTEE Fionuala Margaret Dullea 414 437 851 Blaine D. Bershad 426 442 868 Paul V. Curley 415 441 856 Angela C. Grattaroti 411 436 847 Richard T. Harrison 392 435 827 Patricia Joan Ward 418 463 881 Robert A. Bloom 416 434 850 Maryanne MacLeod 432 457 889 Catherine M. Ryan 422 439 861 Robert A. Sarafconn 395 441 836 Carol A. Lavigne 416 440 856 Rosanne D. Mapp 411 443 854 Christine A. Smith 436 479 915 Christine R. Nelson 409 459 868 Sherri A. Grande-Direda 414 448 862 Write-ins 9 10 19 Town of Sterling 2020 03 03 Presidential Primary OFFICIAL RESULTS.xlsx PRECINCT 1 PRECINCT 2 TOTALS REPUBLICAN PARTY PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE William F.
    [Show full text]
  • June 12, 2020 Dear Vice President Biden, Every Election Is Called
    June 12, 2020 Dear Vice President Biden, Every election is called "the most important in our lifetime" but, as you have emphasized, 2020 really is. Due to the twin pathogens of Trump and Trumpism, the outcome this fall could keep America on the road to lawless authoritarianism or reroute us to a stronger democracy. A crisis election as big as 1932 requires a big running mate. So why not the best? You have announced both that you will choose a woman and "the most important thing is that it has to be someone who, the day after they're picked, is prepared to be president of the United States of America if something happened." This choice of course is yours alone to make. Since you're a well-known listener, however, we'd like to offer our advice. We 100+ progressive former public officials, authors, actors, activists, advocates and scholars agree that the most important criterion is who would be most capable to be President if necessary. In our view, Elizabeth Warren has proven herself most prepared to ​ be President if the occasion arises and deeply expert on the overlapping emergencies now plaguing America – Covid-19, Economic Insecurity, Racial Injustice and Climate Change: ​ ​ *She's a policy expert. During the presidential campaign, her refrain was, "I have a plan for that" ​ – and she did. Her 50+ "plans" over the past year distinguish her as the only campaign that provided a de facto real-time transition report for whomever won the office. After her candidacy ended, she returned right back to the Senate and immediately responded to our multiple monumental crises with an array of much-lauded policy proposals.
    [Show full text]