The Last Conquest of Ireland (Perhaps)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Last Conquest of Ireland (Perhaps) THE LAST CONQUEST OF IRELAND (PERHAPS). By JOHN MITCHEL. [1861] AUTHOR'S EDITION. BOSTDH mum, UBHARY CH£SiNiiT hill; IVJASS/? - • C; . GLASGOW: R. & T. WASHBOTJRNE, Ltd,, 248 Buchanan Street. Head Office : 1, 2 and 4 Paternoster Row, London, Manchester Depot : 74 Bridge Street. — CONTENTS, CHAPTER L Introduction—Address of the American Congress " To the People of Ireland," in 1775 —Satistics and Condition of Ireland—Ireland in 1843 —O'Connell—The Repeal Debate in the Corporation of Dublin—The "Monster Meetings" in 1843— Opinion in the English Parliament—Sir Robert Peel's Declaration in Answer to Mr Bernal [Osborne], • .--.-...7 CHAPTER II. ** Repeal Year " (1843) —Resources of O'Connell—Clare Election, and Catholic Emancipation—Shiel—" Young Ireland"—Davis, Dillon, Dufl^—The "Nation"—Resources of the English—Disarming loiwa, ---.-•---••-II CHAPTER III. ** The Repeal Year " still—O'Brien's Motion—Arms BiU—Sir Edward Sugden — Dismissed Magistrates — Arbitrators — More Monster Meetings, •••• -••. ••-22 CHAPTER IV. O'Connell's Oratory—Its Themes—The Whigs— Davis and the " Natien" —The Young Agitators—Tara Meeting—Council of Three Himdred—The Queen's Speech against Repeal —Great Meeting at MuUaghmast—Meeting at Clontarf forbidden, • - - -30 CHAPTER V. Determination of the Enemy—Clontarf—The " Projected Massacre " Arrest of O'Connell and the " Conspirators "—Opening of " Con- " ciliation Hall —O'Brien joins the Repealers —I'reparatiou for the Trials, - «« —A It content^ CHAPTER VI. tkm The Trial—SyBtein of " Selecting " a Jury in Ireland—Verdict against O'Comiell—Debate in Parliament on the State of Ireland—Opera- tion of the Arms Act—Sentence and Imprisonment of O'Connell, - 46 CHAPTER VII O'Connell in Prison—Davis; his Misgivings—Reversal of the Judgment —Whig Law Lords—Rejoicings in Dublin—llie People disap- pointed—Federalism—O'Brien, ..-..••55 CHAPTER VIII. Approach of the Famine, in 1845 —Repeal prospects after the liberation of O'Connell—Irish Produce exported to England in 1844—Arms and Detectives in return for it —" Landlord and Tenant " Commis- sion—Ejectment Legislation—Condition of Ireland in 1845—The Devon Commission—The Tenant-Right of Ulster—Conspiracy of Landlords and Legislators—Sir Robert Peel, • • -63 CHAPTER IX. Land-Tenure Report— O'Brien—Eighty-Two Club—Grey Porter— National Militia—President Polk and Orgeon Territory—Robert Tyler— Colleges BUI—MacNevin—James Haughton—John O'Con- nell and General Jackson— Lord Stanley's Bill—" Surplus Popu- lation "—Death of Davis—Famine, 74 CHAPTER X. Davis; his influence, aim, and labours—His opinion of " Imposing Demonstrations "—His Letters—His Death— Fate of MacNevin, 84 CHAPTER XI. Duties of Government—Alms—Playfair and Lindley—Memorial of the Corporation and Citizens of Dublin—Lord Heytesbury—O'Connell'g proposals—O'Brien's— Meeting of Parliament—Coercion Bill Repeal of the Com Laws—Relief, ...... 93 CHAPTER XII. Lobs of the Irish Crops—Accounts between England and Ireland Rapid export of Irish harvest and cattle—Sir Robert Peel's " Remedial Measures '*—O'Brien in Parliament—English Press on "Alms"—Sir Robert Peel's two weapons—Repeal Association Resistance to the Coercion Bill—Extermination in Connaught The " Nation " and Young Ireland—Another State Prosecution —Change of Ministry, 103 ——— CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIII. Fia ** Relief of Famine "- Importations of grain—Imprisonment of O'Brien —Destruction of the Eepeal Association—The Labour-rate Act More Poor Law Extermination—Recruiting, » • • . 112 CHAPTER XrV. Lalxmr-rate Act— Bigfjing holes—England begs for us—Out-door Kelief—" Fast and humiliation "—Quarter-acre clause—The Calcu- lations of " Political Circles " —Two millions of Celtic corpses America baffled—Parish coffins—Repudiation of Alms by the • Nation," 122 CHAPTER XV. Death of O'Connell—His character—Arrangements for the next year's famine—Emigration— Keport of a '* Select Committee "—A New Coercion Act—The Crisis approaches, --•••• 135 CHAPTER XVI. Lord Clarendon, Viceroy—Subterranean agencies of Government Monahan, Attorney-General— Galvvay Election, - • - . 144 CHAPTER XVIL " Dublin during the Famine—"Young Ireland — Alr>,rm of the Moneyed Classes—" S. G. O."—Sudden meeting of Parliament—New Coercion Act—Differences in the Irish Confederation —Break up in the " Nation Office "—O'Brien—The United Irishman," - - 151 CHAPTER XVIII. The "United Irishman" Newspaper—Nature of the enterprise Effect of the French Revolution of February, 1848 — Situation of the Govermnent—Examples, • - - • • •160 CHAPTER XIX. March, 1848—The French Revolution- fTaterford Election—Aggre- gate Meeting in Dublin—Prosecution of O'Brien, Meagher, and Mitchel—O'Brien in the English Parliament—The "Treason- Felony" Act—Trial of O'Brien and Meagher for "Sedition"— " The " United Irishman —Trials for illegal drilling—Prosecution for "Sedition" abandoned- x-vrrest of Mitchel for "Treason- I'elony," ..,-..,.•.. i^ —— Yl CONTENTS. CHAPTER XX. FAGi Bag* of the British Press—Protestant Repeal ABSociatlons—Lord Clarendon's Manoeuvres among the Orangemen—Proclamationa against " Communists " —-The Chartists and Irish in England Letter to the Protestants of the North— Prosecution, - • 174 CHAPTER XXT. Juries in Ireland —Whig professions of impartiality—In the Dock Holmes— Challenging the array — Closing Scene — The Clubs restrained—Meagher's Account—My last week in Ireland, - - 182 CHAPTER XXII. " Triumph of the Enemy—The " Irish Tribune —The Ech'tors—Habeas Corpus suspended—Numerous Arrests — O'Brien takes to the Country—Carrick—Killenaule—Ballingarry—Dispersion of the people—No Insurrection, 192 CHAPTER XXIII. Arrest of O'Brien; of Meagher; of MacManus, etc. —Trials—Excuse for more Jury-packing—Excitement in England—Trial of Chartists —Special Commission in Clonmel— Trial of O'Brien for High Treason—Sentence of Death—Trials of MacManus, O'Donohoe, and Meagher—Commutation of the Sentences of Death—Plan for " a New " Plantation of Ireland — Systematic vilification of the Celtic Irish by Enghsh writers, 202 CHAPTER XXIV. Consummation of the " Conquest "—The Queen's Speech in 1849 More Coercion—More Poor-law—Depopulation: condition of the people, as described by Mr DufFy in 1849— Lord John liussell's " •' Eate-in-aid "—The '* Incumbered Estates Act — Result to Ireland of Incumbered Estates Court—Queen's Visit to Ireland in 1849: Popular feeling in Dublin suppressed by the Police L^eland "tranquil," "improving," and " prosperous " — Statistics —KecaiDituletiun—Conclusion, --.«--• 210 THE LAST CONQUEST OF IRELAND (PERHAPS). CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION—ADDRESS OF T^E AMERICAN CONGRESS " TO TEE PEOPLE OF IRELAND," IN 1775— STATISTICS AND CONDITION OF IRELAND—IRELAND IN 1843—O'CONNELL—THE REPEAL DEBATE IN THE CORPORATION OF DUBLIN—THE "MONSTER MEETINGS" IN 1843—OPINION IN THE ENGLISH PARLIAMENT—SIR ROBERT peel's DECLARATION IN ANSWER TO MR BERNAL [oSBORNe], " We are desirous of possessing the good opinion of the virtuous and humane. We are peculiarly desirous of furnishing you with the true state of our motives and objects) the better to enable you to judge of our conduct with accuracy and determine the merits of the controversy with impartiality and precision.^' These sentences are taken from the " Address to the People of Ireland/' by the Continental Congress of America, adopted July, 1776. They fit the other side at present. The Irish People are now the pleaders and appellants. Americans are the virtuous and humane. In the same Address, Congress was pleased to say to the People of Ireland: " Your Parliament had done us no wrong. You had ever been friendly to the rights of mankind; and we acknowledge with pleasure and gratitude that your nation has produced patriots who have nobly distinguished themselves in the cause of humanity and America." Ireland, at that time, had a Parliament, and national exist- ence; and her voice counted for something among civilized nations. And Americans, at that time, would have been very unwilling that the civilized world should form its ideas of their rightSj wrongs, and resistance from the British Press; but their eventual success set them quite above that apprehension; for the civilized world " sympathizes " with success. Ireland^ on $ THE LAST CONQUEST the contrary, having been, since that day, ttoice broken, con- quered, and utterly ruined, it may seem that the English have a patent-right in our history, as well as in everything else of ours, and must not be interrupted or controverted. Yet there are some circumstances which perplex an inquirer who derivep his information from the English periodical press. That an island which is said to be an antegral part of the richest empire on the globe—and the most fertile portion of that empire;—with British Constitution, Hahecis Coi-pus^ Members of Parliament, and Trial by Jury—should in five years lose two and a half millions of its people (more than one- fourth) by hunger, and fever the consequence of hunger, and flight beyond sea to escape from hunger,—while that empire of which it is said to be a part, was all the while advancing in wealth, prosperity, and comfort, at a faster pace than ever before,—is a matter that seems to ask elucidation. In the year 1841, Ireland, a country precisely half the size of the State of Georgia, had a population of 8,175,124. The natural rate of increase of population in Ireland, through all her former troubles, would have given upwards of nine millions in 1851; but in 1851 the Census Commissioners find in Ireland but 6,515,794 living souls. (Thorn's Official Director//.) Another thing, which
Recommended publications
  • To Plant and Improve: Justifying the Consolidation of Tudor and Stuart Rule in Ireland, 1509 to 1625
    To Plant and Improve: Justifying the Consolidation of Tudor and Stuart Rule in Ireland, 1509 to 1625 Samantha Watson A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities and Languages Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences September 2014 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Watson First name: Samantha Other name/s: Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: School of Humanities and Languages Faculty: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Title: To plant and improve: justifying the consolidation of Tudor and Stuart rule in Ireland, 1509 to 1625. Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) This thesis aims to examine the ideologies employed in justifying English conquest and plantation of Ireland between 1509 and 1625. It adopts the methodology of a contextualist intellectual history, which situates the sources within the intellectual and material world, and in relation to the publically approved paradigms, available to the authors. The thesis encompasses a range of source material - correspondence, policy papers and published tracts - from major and minor figures in government and undertakers of colonisation schemes. The source material will be examined with respect to the major upheavals in intellectual culture in late medieval and early modern England and, in particular, the impact of major pan- European movements, the Protestant Reformation and the Renaissance. Focussing on the ethics associated with the spread of Renaissance humanism and Calvinist Protestantism, it explores socio-political ideas in England and examines the ways that these ideas were expressed in relation to Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • FLAG of IRELAND - a BRIEF HISTORY Where in the World
    Part of the “History of National Flags” Series from Flagmakers FLAG OF IRELAND - A BRIEF HISTORY Where In The World Trivia The Easter Rising Rebels originally adopted the modern green-white-orange tricolour flag. Technical Specification Adopted: Officially 1937 (unofficial 1916 to 1922) Proportion: 1:2 Design: A green, white and orange vertical tricolour. Colours: PMS – Green: 347, Orange: 151 CMYK – Green: 100% Cyan, 0% Magenta, 100% Yellow, 45% Black; Orange: 0% Cyan, 100% Magenta 100% Yellow, 0% Black Brief History The first historical Flag was a banner of the Lordship of Ireland under the rule of the King of England between 1177 and 1542. When the Crown of Ireland Act 1542 made Henry VII the king of Ireland the flag became the Standard of the Kingdom of Ireland, a blue field featuring a gold harp with silver strings. The Banner of the Lordship of Ireland The Royal Standard of the Kingdom of Ireland (1177 – 1541) (1542 – 1801) When Ireland joined with Great Britain to form the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in 1801, the flag was replaced with the Flag of the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland. This was flag of the United Kingdom defaced with the Coat of Arms of Ireland. During this time the Saint Patrick’s flag was also added to the British flag and was unofficially used to represent Northern Ireland. The Flag of the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland The Cross of Saint Patrick (1801 – 1922) The modern day green-white-orange tricolour flag was originally used by the Easter Rising rebels in 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022 Record of Protected Structures - Volume 4 DRAFT Record of Protected Structures
    Draft Dublin City Development Plan 2016-2022 Record of Protected Structures - Volume 4 DRAFT Record of Protected Structures Ref Number Address Description RPS_1 7-8 Abbey Street Lower, Dublin 1 Veritas House RPS_2 9 Abbey Street Lower, Dublin 1 Licensed premises. (Return - 108 Marlborough Street) RPS_39cAbbey Street Lower, Dublin 1 Dublin Central Mission RPS_410Abbey Street Lower, Dublin 1 Commercial premises RPS_5 12b Abbey Street Lower, Dublin 1 TSB Bank (former Dublin Savings Bank) RPS_6 Abbey Street Lower, Dublin 1 Ormond Quay and Scots Presbyterian Church. RPS_735Abbey Street Lower, Dublin 1 CIE offices RPS_8 36-38 Abbey Street Lower, Dublin 1 Hotel (Wynn's) RPS_946Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 Upper floors RPS_10 47 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 House RPS_11 48 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 House RPS_12 50 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 Georgian-style house RPS_13 51 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 Georgian-style house RPS_14 59 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 Georgian-style house/commercial premises. RPS_15 69 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 Upper floors of commercial premises; faience surrounding central pedimented Venetian-type window; faience parapet mouldings RPS_16 70 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 Upper floors of commercial premises; faience surrounding central pedimented Venetian-type window; faience parapet mouldings RPS_17 78 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 The Oval licensed premises - façade only RPS_18 87-90 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin 1 Independent House, including roof and roof pavilions RPS_19 94-96 Abbey Street Middle, Dublin
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth I and Irish Rule: Causations For
    ELIZABETH I AND IRISH RULE: CAUSATIONS FOR CONTINUED SETTLEMENT ON ENGLAND’S FIRST COLONY: 1558 - 1603 By KATIE ELIZABETH SKELTON Bachelor of Arts in History Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2009 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 2012 ELIZABETH I AND IRISH RULE: CAUSATIONS FOR CONTINUED SETTLEMENT ON ENGLAND’S FIRST COLONY: 1558 - 1603 Thesis Approved: Dr. Jason Lavery Thesis Adviser Dr. Kristen Burkholder Dr. L.G. Moses Dr. Sheryl A. Tucker Dean of the Graduate College ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1 II. ENGLISH RULE OF IRELAND ...................................................... 17 III. ENGLAND’S ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIP WITH IRELAND ...................... 35 IV. ENGLISH ETHNIC BIAS AGAINST THE IRISH ................................... 45 V. ENGLISH FOREIGN POLICY & IRELAND ......................................... 63 VI. CONCLUSION ...................................................................... 90 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................ 94 iii LIST OF MAPS Map Page The Island of Ireland, 1450 ......................................................... 22 Plantations in Ireland, 1550 – 1610................................................ 72 Europe, 1648 ......................................................................... 75 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page
    [Show full text]
  • Divided Sovereignty, Identity and Politics in Ireland
    E-journal promoted by the Campus for Peace, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya http://journal-of-conflictology.uoc.edu ARTICLE The Fractured Island: Divided Sovereignty, Identity and Politics in Ireland Alan Bruce Submitted: July 2013 Accepted: September 2013 Published: November 2013 Abstract Since the final conclusion of the Good Friday Agreement in 1998, the violent conflict and military operations convulsing the state of Northern Ireland since 1969 appeared over and peace restored. Despite this, profound mistrust and division remains. This paper examines the factors influencing historic conflict in Ireland with reference to the acceptable forms of governance in a deeply divided society with antagonistic and diametrically opposed concepts of citizenship, allegiance and sovereignty. The changes have been fundamental and profound: absence of military occupation models, entry into public life and political responsibility of former combatants, development of power-sharing governmental structures and progress of civil society. The fact remains that the Good Friday Agreement was seen by the majority community – the unionist population – as a guarantee to assert its intention and desire to remain an integral part of the United Kingdom (to remain British). In the same manner and in the same way, the Agreement was seen by the minority community – the nationalist population – as a guarantee to assert its intention to leave the United Kingdom and to re-unite with the rest of Ireland (to remain Irish). Ireland has never been a uniform or agreed socio-political entity. The nature of Irish society is been fragmented, divided and polyglot. The fractured states that emerged from the forced partition of Ireland in 1922 epitomized the crises and issues around sovereignty and identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Individual Rights As the Foundation for Lasting Peace in Northern Ireland Christopher A
    Boston College Third World Law Journal Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 5 1-1-1995 Does Peace Have a Chance? Protection of Individual Rights as the Foundation for Lasting Peace in Northern Ireland Christopher A. Callanan Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Christopher A. Callanan, Does Peace Have a Chance? Protection of Individual Rights as the Foundation for Lasting Peace in Northern Ireland, 15 B.C. Third World L.J. 87 (1995), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/twlj/vol15/iss1/5 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Third World Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOES PEACE HAVE A CHANCE? PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AS THE FOUNDATION FOR lASTING PEACE IN NORTHERN IRELAND CHRISTOPHER A. CALLANAN* 1. INTRODUCTION She would later tell her story to reporters, identifYing herself only as "Sharon."! She had spent a Saturday night in her father's bar in Greysteel, Northern Ireland, which at the time probably did not seem in any way out of the ordinary.2 Perhaps Sharon noticed only that the Rising Sun was particularly "packed" that night.3 However, it was the night before Halloween, so the crowd of about sixty likely seemed appropriate for the occasion.4 Unfortunately, nothing could have prepared Sharon for this par­ ticular Saturday night.
    [Show full text]
  • IRF Off: Connacht's Fight for Survival and the Foundation Myth of a Rugby Identity
    Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title IRF Off: Connacht's fight for survival and the foundation myth of a rugby Identity Author(s) Cooke, Ruadhán; Ó Cofaigh, Éamon Publication Date 2017-08-24 Cooke, Ruadhán, & Ó Cofaigh, Éamon. (2017). IRF Off: Publication Connacht’s Fight for Survival and the Foundation Myth of a Information Rugby Identity. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 34(3-4), 201-216. doi: 10.1080/09523367.2017.1359162 Publisher Taylor & Francis Link to publisher's https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2017.1359162 version Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/7027 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2017.1359162 Downloaded 2021-09-28T18:24:13Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. IRF OFF: CONNACHT’S FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL AND THE FOUNDATION MYTH OF A RUGBY IDENTITY Ruadhán Cooke & Éamon Ó Cofaigh The Connacht Rugby website describes its crest as ‘a modified version of the provincial flag consisting of a dimidiated eagle and an arm wielding a sword’. Little could Connacht have suspected that the arm wielding the sword over the province would one day be that of its own parent body. This article will retrace briefly the history of Connacht Rugby, focusing in particular on the near-death experience of the 2002/03 season. In reviewing the media coverage of a three-week window of protest which ultimately prompted the IRFU to reverse its plan to disband the professional team, this article will critically assess the legacy of the protest movement whose lasting achievements include not just the immediate survival of the franchise but its more recent successes on and off the field.1 The story of Connacht Rugby will be situated in the context of its geographic location and history of economic and social marginalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Group Survey, Based on Data Collected in the Course of The
    THE PATTERN OF THE ABO BLOOD GROUP FREQUENCIES IN IRELAND W. E. R. HACKETT Late Medical Director, National Blood Transfusion Association of Ireland G. W. P. DAWSON School of Botany, Trinity College, Dublin C. J. DAWSON Chief Technician, Notional Blood Transfusion Centre, Dublin Received9.viii.55 ThE genetic history of any population may be elucidated either by historical studies using written, oral and archological evidence or by analysing the present day population to discover, if possible, the components of its composition. The two approaches are comple- mentary and the primary aim of the present paper is to consider the frequencies of the ABO blood group genes in peoples in different parts of Ireland and to correlate these frequencies with what is known of the history of the population. As that which is new is the ABO blood group survey, based on data collected in the course of the work of the National Blood Transfusion Association, this will be described at length and some account will also be given of the distribu- tion of Rhesus-positive and Rhesus-negative people. I.AN OUTLINE OF THE HISTORY OF THE POPULATION OF IRELAND Irelandhas no internal geographical barriers to speak of. The mountains are low, the rivers shallow. In general the most productive agricultural land is in the east, the most barren in the west, but there are few parts which are not inhabitable on a basis of either a tillage, a grazing or a fishing economy. From archaological evidence it appears that Ireland was first inhabited in the immediate post-glacial period.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Dublin Oxford Historical Monographs
    MODERN DUBLIN OXFORD HISTORICAL MONOGRAPHS Editors p. clavin l. goldman j. innes r. service p. a. slack b. ward-perkins j. l. watts Modern Dublin Urban Change and the Irish Past, 1957–1973 ERIKA HANNA 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Erika Hanna 2013 Th e moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2013 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available ISBN 978–0–19–968045–0 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • "NORTHERN IRELAND CONFLICT" By: Tariq Al-Ansari
    INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION Paper on "NORTHERN IRELAND CONFLICT" By: Tariq Al-Ansari I. Introduction 1. Throughout history, the island of Ireland has been regarded as a single national unit. Prior to the Norman invasions from England In 1169, the Irish people were distinct from other nations, cultivating their own system of law, culture, language, and political and social structures. Until 1921, the island of Ireland was governed as a single political unit as a colony of Britain. A combined political/military campaign by Irish nationalists between the years 1916 to 1921 forced the British government to consider its position. Partition was imposed on the Irish people by an Act of Parliament, the Government of Ireland Act (1920), passed in the British legislature. The consent of the Irish people was never sought and was never freely given. 2. With the objective of “protecting English interests with an economy of English lives” (Lord Birkenhead), the partition of Ireland was conceived. Proffered as a solution under the threat of ''immediate and terrible war'' (Lloyd George, the then British Prime Minister). The Act made provision for the creation of two states in Ireland: the ''Irish Free State'' (later to become known as the Republic of Ireland), containing 26 of Ireland's 32 counties; and ''Northern Ireland'' containing the remaining six counties. 3. Northern Ireland (the Six Counties) represented the greatest land area in which Irish unionists could maintain a majority. The partition line first proposed had encompassed the whole province of Ulster (nine counties). Unionists rejected this because they could not maintain a majority in such an enlarged area.
    [Show full text]
  • ICRP Calendar
    The notions of International Relations (IR) in capital letters and international relations (ir) in lowercase letters have two different meanings. The first refers to a scholarly discipline while the second one means a set of contemporary events with historical importance, which influences global-politics. In order to make observations, formulate theories and describe patterns within the framework of ‘IR’, one needs to fully comprehend specific events related to ‘ir’. It is why the Institute for Cultural Relations Policy (ICRP) believes that a timeline on which all the significant events of international relations are identified might be beneficial for students, scholars or professors who deal with International Relations. In the following document all the momentous wars, treaties, pacts and other happenings are enlisted with a monthly division, which had considerable impact on world-politics. January 1800 | Nationalisation of the Dutch East Indies The Dutch East Indies was a Dutch colony that became modern Indonesia following World War II. It was formed 01 from the nationalised colonies of the Dutch East India Company, which came under the administration of the Dutch government in 1800. 1801 | Establishment of the United Kingdom On 1 January 1801, the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Kingdom of Ireland united to form the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Most of Ireland left the union as the Irish Free State in 1922, leading to the remaining state being renamed as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1927. 1804 | Haiti independence declared The independence of Haiti was recognized by France on 17 April 1825.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster-Scots Curriculum Project
    Ulster-Scots Curriculum Project MEET THE ULSTER-SCOTS Signs Symbols and Myths PUPIL BOOKLET What Is Ulster-Scots? Before we begin work on this unit let’s make sure we all understand what is meant by the term ‘Ulster-Scot’. Do you know exactly where and what ‘Ulster’ is? If not, you will need to find out. You could use a search engine on the internet for this. Here’s how - go to www.google.co.uk/ You can now type in the word ‘Ulster’ and see what suggestions you are given. Look at more than one suggested website for the answer. Remember anyone can create a web page. You should always cross check the information you get from the internet to make sure it is accurate and up-to-date. Just because it is there does not mean it is correct! What Is Ulster-Scots? So now you know that Ulster is one of the four provinces of Ireland. The other three are Munster, Leinster, Connaught. The province of Ulster is made up of nine counties: Down, Tyrone. Antrim, Londonderry, Fermanagh and Armagh which are all in Northern Ireland and Donegal, Cavan and Monaghan which are part of the Republic of Ireland. THE PEOPLE The term ‘Ulster-Scots’ is used to name the people in the six counties of Northern Ireland and the three border counties of (East) Donegal, Cavan and Monaghan in the Republic of Ireland whose ancestors came across to Ulster from Scotland. There have been comings and goings across the short stretch of water between the eastern coast of Ulster and south-west Scotland for hundreds if not thousands of years.
    [Show full text]