DOCSLIB.ORG

Niche Construction Author(S): F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Niche Construction Author(S): F The University of Chicago Niche Construction Author(s): F. John Odling-Smee, Kevin N. Laland and Marcus W. Feldman Source: The American Naturalist, Vol. 147, No. 4 (Apr., 1996), pp. 641-648 Published by: The University of Chicago Press for The American Society of Naturalists Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2463239 . Accessed: 23/02/2014 15:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press, The American Society of Naturalists, The University of Chicago are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Naturalist. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.2.19.102 on Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:09:33 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Vol. 147, No. 4 The AmericanNaturalist April 1996 NOTES AND COMMENTS NICHE CONSTRUCTION Organisms,through their metabolism, their activities, and their choices, define, partlycreate, and partlydestroy their own niches. We referto thesephenomena as "nicheconstruction." Here we arguethat niche construction regularly mod- ifiesboth biotic and abioticsources of naturalselection in environmentsand, in so doing,generates a formof feedback in evolutionthat is notyet fully appreci- ated by contemporaryevolutionary theory (Lewontin 1978, 1983; Odling-Smee 1988,in press). Adaptationis generallythought of as a process by whichnatural selection shapesorganisms to fitpreestablished environmental "templates." Environments pose "problems,"and thoseorganisms best equipped to deal withthe problems leave themost offspring. Despite the recognition that forces independent of or- ganismsoften change the worlds to whichpopulations adapt (Van Valen 1973), thechanges that organisms bring about in theirown worlds are rarelyconsidered in evolutionaryanalyses. Yet, to varyingdegrees, organisms choose theirown habitats,mates, and resourcesand constructimportant components of theirlo- cal environmentssuch as nests,holes, burrows, paths, webs, dams, and chemical environments.Many organisms also choose, protect,and provision"nursery" environmentsfor their offspring. Organisms not only adapt to environments,but in partalso constructthem (Lewontin 1983). Hence, manyof the sources of naturalselection to whichorganisms are exposedexist partly as a consequence ofthe niche-constructing activities of past and presentgenerations of organisms. Thereare numerouscases oforganisms modifying their own selective environ- mentsin nontrivialways, by changingtheir surroundings or by constructingarti- facts(Von Frisch1975; Hansell 1984). One earlyexample was describedby Dar- win(1881). Earthworms, through their burrowing activities, their dragging organic materialinto the soil, theirmixing it withinorganic material, and theircasting, whichserves as a basis formicrobial activity, change both the structureand chemistryof soils (Lee 1985). As a resultof the accumulatedeffects of past generationsof earthwormniche construction, present generations inhabit radi- cally alteredenvironments and are exposedto changingsets of selectionpres- sures. Thereis also considerableevidence of evolutionaryresponses to self-induced selectionpressures. For instance,social bees, wasps, ants, and termites construct Am. Nat. 1996. Vol. 147, pp. 641-648. ? 1996 by The Universityof Chicago. 0003-0147/96/4704-0009$02.00.All rightsreserved. This content downloaded from 129.2.19.102 on Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:09:33 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 642 THE AMERICANNATURALIST elaboratenests that then mediate selection for many nest regulatory,mainte- nance,and defensebehaviors (Rothenbuhler 1964; Spradbery 1973; Von Frisch 1975;Mathews and Mathews 1978; Hansell 1984). Many species of fish, amphibi- ans, reptiles,birds, and mammalsconstruct nests and burrows,which then influ- encefurther selection. For example,comparative evidence suggests that the com- plexburrow systems excavated by moles, rats, badgers, and marmots,with their undergroundpassages, interconnected chambers, and multipleentrances, have servedas thesource of selection for defense, maintenance, and regulationbehav- iorsand componentsof matingrituals (Von Frisch1975; Hansell 1984). Plants,too, changethe chemical nature, pattern of nutrientcycling, tempera- ture,humidity, and fertilityof thesoils in whichthey live (Ricklefs1990). They mayeven affectlocal climates,the amount of precipitation,and thewater cycle (Shuklaet al. 1990).Many plants also changeboth their own and otherspecies' local environmentsvia allelopathy(Rice 1984),while pine and chaparraltree speciesfacilitate forest fires by accumulatingoils or litter(Mount 1964; Allen and Starr1982). These specieshave evolveda resistanceto fireand, in some pine speciesthat require a firebefore their seeds willgerminate, a dependencyon it (Allenand Starr1982). THE EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF NICHE CONSTRUCTION Theseexamples, and others (Lewontin 1982, 1983), suggest that niche construc- tionmay be a generalphenomenon, that it is not restrictedto a few isolated speciesor taxa,and that feedback from phenotypically modified sources of selec- tionin environmentshas evolutionaryas well as ecologicalconsequences. Al- thoughseveral topics in contemporarypopulation biology are alreadyconcerned withthe evolutionary consequences of the changes that organisms bring about in theirown environments(e.g., habitat,frequency- and density-dependentselec- tion),so farthese analyses have onlyfocused on geneticloci thatinfluence the productionof the niche-constructingphenotype itself. What is missingis any explorationof thefeedback effects on othergenetic loci. A moregeneral body oftheory is required. In orderto encouragethe developmentof this theory,in whatfollows we discusssome evolutionary consequences of nicheconstruction and detailwhy it is likelyto be of significanceto thebiological sciences. EXTRAGENETIC INHERITANCE Currently,evolutionary theory rests heavily on theassumption that only genes are transmittedfrom generation to generation,the principal exception being cul- turalinheritance (Feldman and Cavalli-Sforza1976; Boyd and Richerson1985). However,ancestral niche-constructing organisms effectively transmit legacies of modifiednatural selection pressures in theirenvironments to theirdescendants. Thisextragenetic inheritance has previouslybeen calledan "exploitivesystem" (Waddington1959), an "ontogeneticinheritance" (West et al. 1988),and an "eco- logicalinheritance" (Odling-Smee 1988). We willintroduce it in stages. This content downloaded from 129.2.19.102 on Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:09:33 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions NOTES AND COMMENTS 643 If,in each generation, each organismonly modifies its environment temporarily or inconsistently,then there will be no cumulativeor consistentmodification of any sourceof naturalselection in its population'senvironment. If, however,in each generation,each organismrepeatedly changes its own ontogenetic environ- mentin the same way,because each individualinherits the same genescausing it to do so, thenancestral organisms can modifya sourceof natural selection for theirdescendants by repetitiveniche construction. The environmentalconse- quencesof such niche construction may be transitoryand may still be restrictedto singlegenerations only, but the same induced environmental change is reimposed sufficientlyoften, for sufficient generations, to serveas a significantsource of selection. For example,individual web spidersrepeatedly make webs in theirenviron- ments,generation after generation, because theyrepeatedly inherit genes in- structingthem to do so. Subsequently,the consistent presence of a web in each spider'senvironment may, over manygenerations, feed back to become the sourceof a newselection pressure for a furtherphenotypic change in thespiders, such as the buildingby Cyclosa of dummyspiders in theirwebs to divertthe attentionof avian predators (Edmunds 1974). Yet, thiskind of feedback does not introducean extrageneticinheritance in evolution,because no consequenceof nicheconstruction is transmittedthrough an externalenvironment from one gen- erationto thenext. In morecomplex cases, inheritedgenes instruct organisms to modifyrepeatedly the ontogeneticenvironments of theiroffspring as well as, or insteadof, their own. Here theconsequences of niche construction are effectively"transmitted" fromone generationto the nextvia an externalenvironment, in the formof a parentallymodified source of natural selection for their offspring. This transmittal is sufficientto establishan extrageneticinheritance system in evolution. Offspring nowreceive a dualinheritance from their parents, genes relative to theirselective environments,and at leastsome parentally modified sources of selectionin their environmentsrelative to theirgenes. The cuckoois an example.Cuckoo parents repeatedly select host nests for their offspring,generation after generation, thereby bequeathing modified selection pressuresas wellas genesto theiroffspring. These modifiedselection pressures have thenapparently selected for changed adaptations in theoffspring, such as a shortincubation period or the behavioralejection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Niche Construction in Interdisciplinary Focus
    Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on February 14, 2011 Human niche construction in interdisciplinary focus Jeremy Kendal, Jamshid J. Tehrani and John Odling-Smee Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2011 366, 785-792 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0306 References This article cites 46 articles, 16 of which can be accessed free http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/366/1566/785.full.html#ref-list-1 Rapid response Respond to this article http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/letters/submit/royptb;366/1566/785 Subject collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections behaviour (1807 articles) evolution (2433 articles) Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top Email alerting service right-hand corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B go to: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on February 14, 2011 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B (2011) 366, 785–792 doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0306 Introduction Human niche construction in interdisciplinary focus Jeremy Kendal1,*, Jamshid J. Tehrani1 and John Odling-Smee2 1Centre for the Coevolution of Biology and Culture, Department of Anthropology, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK 2School of Anthropology, University of Oxford, 51/53 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PE, UK Niche construction is an endogenous causal process in evolution, reciprocal to the causal process of natural selection. It works by adding ecological inheritance, comprising the inheritance of natural selection pressures previously modified by niche construction, to genetic inheritance in evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Grassland Ecosystems in British Columbia
    Grassland Ecosystems in British Columbia © Grasslands Conservation Council of BC 1 The Grasslands Conservation Council of British Columbia’s mission is to: • Foster understanding and appreciation for the ecological, social, economic, and cultural importance of BC grasslands. • Promote stewardship and sustainable management practices to ensure the long-term health of BC grasslands. • Promote the conservation of representative grassland ecosystems, species at risk, and their habitats. &/OR Acknowledgements for original author and illustrator &/OR Another message that it makes sense to include. Maybe the mission in simple language. Grasslands Conservation Council of British Columbia. (Year). Grassland Ecosystems in British Columbia. Kamloops, BC: Author. © Grasslands Conservation Council of BC 2 Grassland Ecosystems Ecological systems (ecosystems) consist of all the living organisms in an area and their physical environment (soil, water, air). Ecosystems are influenced over time by the local climate, the parent material under the plants, variations in the local landscape, disturbances such as fire and floods, and by the organisms that live in them. Grassland ecosystems in British Columbia generally occur in areas where the climate is hot and dry in summer and cool to cold and dry in winter. The parent material is often composed of fine sediments, and grasslands are most often in valley or plateau landscapes. The organisms that live in them include plants and animals that have adapted to the dry climatic conditions in a variety of ways. Differences in elevation, climate, soils, aspect, and their position in relation to mountain ranges have resulted in many variations in the grassland ecosystems of British Columbia. The mosaics of ecosystems found in our grasslands, including wetlands, riparian areas, aspen stands and rocky cliffs, allow for a rich diversity of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Predicted Isolation Effects from the General Dynamic Model of Island Biogeography with an Eco‐Evolutionary Model for Plants
    Received: 4 January 2017 | Revised: 27 March 2019 | Accepted: 6 April 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13603 RESEARCH PAPER Assessing predicted isolation effects from the general dynamic model of island biogeography with an eco‐evolutionary model for plants Juliano Sarmento Cabral1,2,3 | Robert J. Whittaker4,5 | Kerstin Wiegand6 | Holger Kreft2 1Ecosystem Modeling, Center of Computation and Theoretical Abstract Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Aims: The general dynamic model (GDM) of oceanic island biogeography predicts Germany how biogeographical rates, species richness and endemism vary with island age, area 2Biodiversity, Macroecology & Biogeography, University of Göttingen, and isolation. Here, we used a simulation model to assess whether the isolation‐re‐ Göttingen, Germany lated predictions of the GDM may arise from low‐level process at the level of indi‐ 3Synthesis Centre of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), viduals and populations. Leipzig, Germany Location: Hypothetical volcanic oceanic islands. 4 Conservation Biogeography and Methods: Our model considers (a) an idealized island ontogeny, (b) metabolic con‐ Macroecology Group, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, straints and (c) stochastic, spatially explicit and niche‐based processes at the level Oxford, UK of individuals and populations (plant demography, dispersal, competition, mutation 5Center for Macroecology, Evolution and speciation). Isolation scenarios involved varying the distance to mainland and the and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, dispersal ability of the species pool. Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Results: For all isolation scenarios, we obtained humped temporal trends for species 6Ecosystem Modelling, Büsgen‐Institute, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, richness, endemic richness, proportion of endemic species derived from within‐is‐ Germany land radiation, number of radiating lineages, number of species per radiating lineage Correspondence and biogeographical rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystems and Biodiversity
    Unit 2: Ecosystem An organism is always in the state of perfect balance with the environment. The environment literally means the surroundings. The environment refers to the things and conditions around the organisms which directly or indirectly influence the life and development of the organisms and their populations. “Ecosystem is a complex in which habitat, plants and animals are considered as one interesting unit, the materials and energy of one passing in and out of the others” – Woodbury. Organisms and environment are two non-separable factors. Organisms interact with each other and also with the physical conditions that are present in their habitats. ―The organisms and the physical features of the habitat form an ecological complex or more briefly an ecosystem.‖ (Clarke, 1954). The concept of ecosystem was first put forth by A.G. Tansley (1935). Ecosystem is the major ecological unit. It has both structure and functions. The structure is related to species diversity. The more complex is the structure the greater is the diversity of the species in the ecosystem. The functions of ecosystem are related to the flow of energy and cycling of materials through structural components of the ecosystem. According to Woodbury (1954), ecosystem is a complex in which habitat, plants and animals are considered as one interesting unit, the materials and energy of one passing in and out of the others. According to E.P. Odum, the ecosystem is the basic functional unit of organisms and their environment interacting with each other and with their own components. An ecosystem may be conceived and studied in the habitats of various sizes, e.g., one square metre of grassland, a pool, a large lake, a large tract of forest, balanced aquarium, a certain area of river and ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Intro
    www.logannature.org 2969 East Highway 89 P.O. Box 4204 Logan, UT 84323 Phone: 435.755.3239 Introduction to Ecology Objectives Students will understand the difference between an individual, a population, a community, and an ecosystem. Method Students will use shapes to depict individuals. They will start the activity as individuals and progress towards becoming an ecosystem. Materials At least 8-10 different shapes (multiple pieces of each shape should be cut out of paper or other material), paper and pencils for each student, a ball of yarn. Background Ecology is the study of ecosystems. But first, we have to understand what an ecosystem is. An ecosystem is a community of living organisms interacting with their abiotic environment. To best explain this to students, it is important that they understand the components you must have to make an ecosystem. The first is the individual. An individual is a single member of a species; a population is many members of the same species living in a specific habitat; a community is a group of interdependent organisms of different species growing or living together in a specified habitat. This brings us to the ecosystem where the community of living organisms interacts with the non-living components of the environment. Procedure 1. Each student will receive a single shape. This shape represents an individual of a species. 2. Each student must find at least 9 more individuals of the same species (They can find these shapes in buckets around the room). This creates a population. 3. Each student should find two more students with different species and combine their shapes to create a community of organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Inheritance: a Cooperative Pathway to Enhance Cancer Cell Fitness Though Ecosystem Engineering
    Niche inheritance: a cooperative pathway to enhance cancer cell fitness though ecosystem engineering Kimberline R. Yang4 Steven Mooney1 Jelani C. Zarif1 Donald S. Coffey1,2,3 Russell S. TaiChman5 Kenneth J. Pienta1,2,3,4 Authors' Affiliations: 1The James BuChanan Brady UrologiCal Institute and Departments of Urology, 2Oncology, 3Pharmacology and MoleCular Sciences, 4Cellular and MoleCular MediCine Program, Johns Hopkins SChool of MediCine, Baltimore, Maryland; 5Department of PeriodontiCs and Oral MediCine, University of MiChigan SChool of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MiChigan Corresponding Author: Kenneth J. Pienta, The James BuChanan Brady UrologiCal Institute and Department of Urology, Departments of OnCology and Pharmacology and MoleCular SCienCes, The Johns Hopkins SChool of MediCine, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail: [email protected] Key words: niChe ConstruCtion, diaspora, metastasis, genetiC instability, tumor Cell heterogeneity, dispersal filters Grant Support This work is finanCially supported by the NCI (grant no. U54CA143803 to K.J. Pienta, D.S. Coffey; grant nos. CA163124 and CA093900 to K.J. Pienta, R.S. TaiChman; and grant no. CA143055 to K.J. Pienta). Abstract: CanCer Cells Can be desCribed as an invasive speCies that is able to establish itself in a new environment. The concept of niChe ConstruCtion Can be utilized to desCribe the proCess by whiCh CanCer Cells terraform their environment, thereby engineering an eCosystem that promotes the genetiC fitness of the species. ECologiCal dispersion theory Can then be utilized to desCribe and model the steps and barriers involved in a successful diaspora as the CanCer Cells leave the original host organ and migrate to new host organs to suCCessfully establish a new metastatiC Community.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche-Driven Socio-Environmental Linkages and Regional Sustainable Development
    sustainability Article Niche-Driven Socio-Environmental Linkages and Regional Sustainable Development Dandan Liu 1 , Anmin Huang 1,*, Dewei Yang 2, Jianyi Lin 3 and Jiahui Liu 3 1 College of Tourism, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China; [email protected] 2 School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; [email protected] 3 Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (J.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The changes in niche roles and functions caused by competition for survival resources have implications in various domains, with natural science and social science standing out. Currently, expanding the ecological niche concept and its practical interpretation in the fields of social ecology, geography and sustainable science is becoming a crucial challenge. This paper is based on niche theory to observe niche evolution and resulting socio-ecological effects of 1186 towns in 19 prefecture cities in Yangtze River delta. The results indicate that: Towns around the Taihu Lake displayed obvious spatial agglomeration, which was leading the development of the entire region. The town niche shows obvious characteristics of north-south differences and hierarchy distribution. The niche coordination degree of Jiangsu Province was higher than that of Zhejiang Province. The higher the subsystem coordination degree, the better the town development. Towns with poor ecological conditions are often subject to competition, while towns with better ecological conditions often benefit from cooperative development. The niche separation and collaboration could enhance niche competition of towns and cities in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystems As Chimeras: a Thought Experiment in Rosennean Complexity
    Ecological Complexity xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Complexity journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecocom Ecosystems as Chimeras: A thought experiment in Rosennean Complexity Patricia A. Lane Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, 1459 Oxford Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2 Canada ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Robert Rosen wrote an interesting paper entitled, “Cooperation and Chimera” in which he explained how living Rosennean complexity systems or their parts often combine with those of others to create chimeran individuals with new genotypes, Ecosystem chimera phenotypes, and environments. He concluded that these relationships are mainly cooperative in that the partners Niche construction provide functional capabilities to each other that the recipients cannot provide for themselves. Rosen developed Marine plankton his concept of chimeras within the broader areas of Rosennean Complexity and Relational Biology, providing Complexity synthesis insights into notions of purpose, function, causality, survival, persistence, and complexity. Loop analysis Chimeras are ubiquitous and occur throughout the biological hierarchy. At the ecosystem level, chimeras can be formed when the member populations are organized into functional groups such as the nodes of a food web, and they interact with each other through environmental modifications that feedback to change phenotypes and genotypes, and form a new individual with a purpose: ecological survival and evolutionary persistence. Thus, ecosystems
    [Show full text]
  • Abiotic Components of a Freshwater System
    Abiotic Components of a Freshwater System Grade Level: Elementary, Middle School, High School Ecological Concepts: Abiotic, Physical factors Arizona Science Standards: Science as Inquiry; Life Science Materials: 1) Pond, stream, or aquarium 2) Loupe or magnifying lenses * 3) Chemical tests * a) pH b) Dissolved oxygen (DO) c) Phosphate d) Nitrogen 4) Rulers 5) Air and water thermometers in °C * 6) Record keeping materials 7) Sampling cups * 8) Wear boots, aqua shoes or old sneakers * May be borrowed from SCENE. BACKGROUND Water is a necessity for all life on this planet. Aquatic ecosystems can be ponds, streams, lakes or oceans. Freshwater ecosystems are usually divided into still water (ponds) and flowing water (streams). Some systems encompass both still and flowing water, such as a stream with deep pools. A variety of organisms live in freshwater, some throughout their lives, others only for certain stages, usually as immatures, or juveniles. Even in the Sonoran Desert there is naturally occurring freshwater. There are rivers and streams that flow all year long, and others, called "ephemeral," flow only during wet seasons. Ponds and pools exist as well, usually ephemerally. In functioning aquatic systems there is a variety of plant and animal life, the biotic part of the system. The abiotic component of freshwater systems is as important as the biotic. Water temperature, pH, phosphate and nitrogen levels, dissolved oxygen, and substrate composition are some of the abiotic factors to consider and measure. These must be within certain ranges for the system to be habitable for living organisms. GUIDED INQUIRY Observation/Exploration Period: Have students observe the water habitat using their eyes, magnifying lenses, dip nets, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Consequences of Human Niche Construction: Examining Long-Term Anthropogenic Shaping of Global Species Distributions Nicole L
    SPECIAL FEATURE: SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE Ecological consequences of human niche construction: Examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions Nicole L. Boivina,b,1, Melinda A. Zederc,d, Dorian Q. Fuller (傅稻镰)e, Alison Crowtherf, Greger Larsong, Jon M. Erlandsonh, Tim Denhami, and Michael D. Petragliaa Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved March 18, 2016 (received for review December 22, 2015) The exhibition of increasingly intensive and complex niche construction behaviors through time is a key feature of human evolution, culminating in the advanced capacity for ecosystem engineering exhibited by Homo sapiens. A crucial outcome of such behaviors has been the dramatic reshaping of the global bio- sphere, a transformation whose early origins are increasingly apparent from cumulative archaeological and paleoecological datasets. Such data suggest that, by the Late Pleistocene, humans had begun to engage in activities that have led to alterations in the distributions of a vast array of species across most, if not all, taxonomic groups. Changes to biodiversity have included extinctions, extirpations, and shifts in species composition, diversity, and community structure. We outline key examples of these changes, highlighting findings from the study of new datasets, like ancient DNA (aDNA), stable isotopes, and microfossils, as well as the application of new statistical and computational methods to datasets that have accumulated significantly in recent decades. We focus on four major phases that witnessed broad anthropogenic alterations to biodiversity—the Late Pleistocene global human expansion, the Neolithic spread of agricul- ture, the era of island colonization, and the emergence of early urbanized societies and commercial net- works.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Review Questions 2
    The 1, Which title would be most appropriate for a textbook on general ecology? (1.) Interactions Between Organisms and Their Environment (2.) The Cell and its Organelles (3.) The Hereditary Mechanism of Drosophila (4.) The Physical and Chemical Properties of Water 2. The following chart lists four groups of factors relating to an ecosystem. Which group contains only abiotic Group A Group D Group C Group D Swthght Sunlbght SwillghI Sun1Qbt Gr€enØants Oflma Goenpants Rainfall Ral Raiafl QonwnQr Minotats Poduuera CxyQer. Gases Carbon lio Water factors? (1.) group A (2.) group B (3.) group C (4.) group D 3. The most likely result of a group of squirrels relying on limited resources would be (1.) competition between the squirrels (2.) an increase in the number of squirrels (3.) increased habitats for the squirrels (4.) a greater diversity of food for the squirrels 4. An ecosystem is represented in the illustration below. This ecosystem will be self-sustaining if (1.) the organisms labeled A outnumber the organisms labeled B (2.) the type of organisms represented by B are eliminated (3.) the organisms labeled A are equal in number to the organisms labeled B (4.) materials cycle between the organisms labeled A and the organisms labeled B in 5. A certain plant requires moisture, oxygen, carbon dioxide, light, and minerals order to survive. This statement shows that a living organism depends on (1.) abiotic factors (2.) biotic factors (3.) carnivore-herbivore relationships (4.) symbiotic relationships 6. Although three different bird species all inhabit the same type of tree in an area, competition between the birds rarely occurs, The most likely explanation for this lack of competition is that these birds (1.) are unable to interbreed (2.) have a limited supply of food (3.) share food with each other (4.) have different ecological niches 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Pollution
    Assign Print Assessment Print with Answers Assessment Pollution INSTRUCTIONS Check your understanding with this practice assessment. 1) Which of the following activities would be least harmful to an ocean environment? o A) A fisherman catching food for his family. o B) Oil is spilled into the water from a tanker ship. o C) Coral reef is removed and sold as souvenirs. o D) Trash is washed from beaches into the water. o Explanation:The answer is A. As long as enough fish are left to reproduce this resource is renewable and removing some would not affect the ocean environment. 2) What does it mean to reuse? o A) use something again o B) use less of something o C) save electricity o D) conserve water o Explanation:The correct answer is A. It is correct because by reusing items it cuts down on excess waste. 3) Which of the following might be a biotic factor in a stream ecosystem? o A) rocks o B) water o C) sunlight o D) pollution o Explanation:The correct answer is D. It is correct because human waste, which is a biotic factor, can cause pollution. 4) Humans have changed the Earth in ways that hurt themselves and other organisms by ________. o A) hunting o B) recycling o C) gardening o D) polluting the air, water, and land o Explanation:The correct answer is D. Human industrialization has polluted air, water, and land. 5) Energy conservation will result in ______. o A) more air pollution. o B) fewer available sources of energy. o C) more acid rain.
    [Show full text]