Romans 14 and the Present Controversy by Jimmy Stevens
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Romans 14 and The Present Controversy By Jimmy Stevens INTRODUCTION Following an incident in Belen, New Mexico in 1987, a controversy began to brew among brethren over the use of Romans 14 in determining fellowship with those who teach a particular false doctrine on divorce and remarriage. This controversy continues to this day. Because a very well known, highly respected and widely influential gospel preacher was teaching this doctrine, a number of brethren believed saints needed to be publicly warned about him and his teaching. He was not to be considered worthy of fellowship. On the other hand, opposing brethren believed that fellowship could and should be recognized with this brother in spite of the fact that they disagreed with his teaching. They justified this position by applying the principles of Romans 14, which teach that brethren can maintain fellowship even though they disagree on certain matters. The primary question we will be studying in this series of lessons is, “Does Romans 14 justify recognizing continued fellowship with one who persists in teaching false doctrine?” I. Purpose for this study. A. Understand what Romans 14 does and does not teach. B. Understand the history and issue of the controversy. C. Show how an improper use of Romans 14 leads to spiritual apostasy. II. Topics of study. A. Topics not addressed. Many topics have been introduced into this controversy which are at best remotely related and some not related at all. The addition of these has often caused confusion and has diverted attention away from the real issue. For that reason discussions relating to “false teachers”, “headcovering”, “military service”, weak or immature Christians who sin, local church autonomy, etc., will not be the focus of our study. However, references to some of these may be made, because they have been introduced and have contributed to creating the controversy. B. Topics addressed. 1. Romans 14 in Context 2. Romans 14 Examined 3. Divorce, Remarriage and Conversion 4. History of The Controversy 5. Issue of The Controversy 6. Effects of Misusing Romans 14 CONCLUSION: It is my prayer that by becoming familiar with the facts of this controversy, we can dispel misunderstanding and be able to fairly examine the teachings of men to see whether or not they are from God. The apostle Peter instructed, “But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear;” 1 Pet 3:15. Romans 14 in Context INTRODUCTION: The immediate context of Romans 14 begins with verse 1 and can be extended to at least verse 7 of chapter 15. However, in order to appreciate the distinctive nature of the fourteenth chapter, a quick survey of the entire book and a few remote contexts is necessary. A. Written by Paul, 1:1. 1. During his third journey when he was on his way to Jerusalem to deliver benevolent aid to the needy saints in Jerusalem. 15:25-26; Acts 19:21; 20: 3, 16, 22; 24:17. 2. From Corinth, compare 16:23 with 1 Cor 1:14, Acts 19:22; 2 Tim 4:20. B. Written “To all who are at Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints:” 1:1. 1. Strong faith known throughout the whole world. 1:8, 12; 16:19. 2. However, the church had its spiritual challenges to remain faithful. 2:1, 16:17. I. Chapters 1-5 God’s provision for man’s salvation. A. Gospel saves. 1:16. B. Gentiles turned from God, He gave them up. 1:18-28. C. Jews also turned away from God. 2:1-6. D. Both Jews and Gentiles under sin and need Christ. 3:9-12, 21-26. Romans 14 And The Present Controversy 2 E. Through faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ, not in human works or the Law of Moses, both Jews and Gentiles are justified before God. 4:9-17; 5:1-9. II. Chapters 6-11 Obligation to obey the gospel and remain faithful. A. Slaves of sin or of righteousness? 6:15-18. B. Old Law has “died”. Now, “marriage” to Christ saves. 7:4-6. C. Living in the “law of the Spirit” to become children of God. 8:1-2; 12-17. D. Grief at the rejection of the gospel by many Jews. 9:1-3; 10:1-3; 11:11-14. E. Gentiles enjoy salvation through Christ. 9:25-26; 30-32, 10:19-20; 11:11-12. III. Chapters 12-16 Principles of the gospel in daily life. A. Attitude toward self, brethren and non-Christians (enemies). 12:1-2, 9-21. B. Responsibilities toward government and fellowman. 13:1-3, 8-14. C. Exercise love and patience on matters of opinion and personal conscience related to authorized liberties in God’s word. 14:14-20; 15:1-7. D. Various personal matters related to Paul’s ministry. 15:20-25. E. Commendations, salutations, warnings and benedictions. 16:1-2, 3-4, 16, 17-18, 25-27. IV. Contrasting Romans 14:1-15:7, with Context. A. Immediate Context 1. Preceding passages, 13:11-14. a. "Cast off the works of darkness" v 12. b. "Walk properly…not in reveling...." v 13. c. "Make no provision for the flesh" v 14. d. Moral sin and strife is condemned. 2. Succeeding passages, 16:17-19. a. "Note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them.” v 17. b. "By...fair speech they beguile" v 18. c. Doctrinal sin condemned. B. Remote Context 1. Moral sin condemned. a. Gal 5:19-21, works of flesh. b. Col 3:5-11, "put to death" our earthly members. c. Eph 5:3-14, reprove unfruitful works of darkness. 2. Doctrinal sin condemned. a. 2 John 9-11, not go beyond doctrine of Christ. b. 1 Tim 1:3, not to teach another doctrine. c. Gal 1:6-9, not to teach another gospel. d. Tit 3:9-11, reject heretics. 3. No fellowship with sin allowed a. 2 Cor 6:14, it is an unequal yoking. b. Eph 5:11, have no fellowship, rather reprove. CONCLUSION: Romans 14 teaches that brethren should recognize fellowship with one another even when they sometimes disagree on spiritual matters. However, the contrasting “Contexts”, both immediate and remote, teach that we are not to have fellowship with those with whom we disagree. Why the difference? A. Romans 14 teaches that brethren should recognize fellowship with each other when disagreements are the result of differences of opinions or convictions determined by personal conscience and not by the violation of God’s law. B. The immediate and remote “Contexts” show that when disagreements are over moral or doctrinal violations, brethren must reject the violators as sinful and not worthy of fellowship with God and faithful brethren. C. Problems arise when disagreements over moral or doctrinal violations are included with differences of opinions or convictions, which are determined by personal conscience and are handled by the teaching of Romans 14. D. Using Romans 14 to justify continued fellowship with those teaching and practicing sin would be a violation of both biblical hermeneutics and the divine purpose God intended for this chapter. Romans 14 And The Present Controversy 3 Romans 14 Examined INTRODUCTION: Rom 14:1-15:7, sets the parameters of our liberties in Christ. A. It establishes a balance between the tendency to bind where God has not bound and giving license to sin. It advocates fellowship while respecting each brother's liberties. Without the truth of these verses, Christians will be hopelessly splintered in as many pieces as there are opinions, or else be invaded by sinful doctrine and practices. B. The sufficiency of God's revelation clearly defines what is required or forbidden. In these areas we have no choice but to obey, 2 John 1:9-11, Jude 3. C. Sufficient revelation also establishes the category of things allowed, also known as authorized liberties, options and expediencies, matters of indifference to God. In this, we may allow differences among brethren without compromising any principle of truth. The early preachers in America recognized this as they sought to restore pure religion in their generation. Their cry was, "In matters of faith, unity; in matters of opinion, liberty; in all things, charity." D. Texts: Rom 14:1-15:7, companion texts 1 Cor 8, 9:19-23, 10:23-11:1, cf. Gal 5:6, 6:15. I. Textual considerations. A. V 1, “disputes over doubtful things” (NKJ). "doubtful disputations" (KJV), 1. Decisions (ASV): diakrisis (Gk) - "A distinguishing, and so a decision..." "...in Rom. 14:1, `not to (doubtful) disputations' is more literally rendered in the margin `not for decisions (of doubts)'"1 2. Doubtful (Gk) - dialogismos, "the thinking of a man deliberating with himself; hence 1. a thought, inward reasoning"2 3. Thus, our "receiving" a brother into fellowship is not conditioned upon an agreement or forced decisions concerning all his internal doubts. Brethren may worship together even when they disagree in matters about which God is indifferent. 1 Cor 8:8. A weak brother may have personal, inward doubts about authorized liberties that a strong brother may practice, but fellowship is not restricted because of this disagreement. Obviously this "agreeing to disagree" does not involve sinful doctrines and practices but things inherently "good," "clean," and "pure." v 14, 16, 20. 4. "Disputes" are forbidden concerning these things. There must be no "contention," as is necessary with doctrinal matters, Jude 3.