Practical Handbook on the Operation of the Service Convention

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Practical Handbook on the Operation of the Service Convention Practical Convention on the Operation Handbook of the Service s v Hague Conference on Private International Law Permanent Bureau Practical HandbookOnly Churchillplein 6b 2517 JW The Hague The Netherlands on the Operationer w+31 70 363 3303 Use +31 70 360 4867 of the Service [email protected] i www.hcch.net Convention c Official For e Only Use Official For Only Practical HandbookUse on the Operation of the Service Convention Official For Only Use Published by The Hague Conference on Private International Law Permanent Bureau Churchillplein 6b 2517 JW The Hague The Netherlands Official +31 70 363 3303 +31 70 360 4867 [email protected] www.hcch.net For © Hague Conference on Private International Law 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying or recording, without the written permission of the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference. ISBN 978-94-90265-47-2 Published in The Hague, the Netherlands Foreword On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the conclusion of the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, it is my great pleasure to present this updated and expanded 4th edition of the Practical Handbook on the Operation of the Service Convention. Since the publication of the 3rd edition of this Handbook in 2006 (whichOnly I had the pleasure to prepare with the assistance of Ms Laurence Thébault), there have been important developments in case law and State practice in relation to the Hague Service Convention. These developments are the most important basis for this 4th edition. Furthermore, in recent years, new issues have arisen with respect to the operation of the Convention, many of which are the result of unprecedented technological developments. Thus, this 4th edition also includes comprehensive research and analysis relatingUse to the use of information technology in the operation of the Convention, an area that continues to evolve. I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank all those who have contributed to the finalisation of this edition of the Handbook (a succinct synopsis summarising the genesis of the Handbook follows below, p. V). At the Permanent Bureau, the main preparatory and drafting work was carried out by Ms Mayela Celis (Principal Legal Officer). My attaché Mr Thomas John and Mr Alexander Kunzelmann (former Senior Legal Officer) also contributed to this important work. It has been finalised with the assistance of Mr Brody Warren (Legal Officer). I am also most grateful to the many national experts who were part of the Working Group and who helped to produce an advanced draft of this edition of the Handbook as partOfficial of the preparations for the meeting of the Special Commission held in 2014 (these experts are listed on p. VII). Thanks should also go to the many interns of the Permanent Bureau who were involved in this project. While they are too numerous to be listed here, I wish to acknowledge their contributions. This Handbook is published together with its pendant, the Practical Handbook on the OperationFor of the Evidence Convention, which is now available in a new, completely revised, 3rd edition. Both Handbooks are first-of-a-kind publications prepared by the Permanent Bureau: before their official release, they were formally approved by the Council on General Affairs and Policy, the highest organ of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. This of course only increases the authoritative value of this Handbook as a secondary source of information on the operation of this important Convention. IV PRACTICAL HANDBOOK ON THE OPERATION OF THE SERVICE CONVENTION | FOREWORD This edition of the Handbook has been updated to November 2015. We recommend that readers consult the Hague Conference website on a regular basis for supplementary practical information and updates regarding the Convention. Just as the previous edition of the Service Handbook was widely used and cited around the world, including by courts, I very much hope that this 4th edition, too, continues to prove useful and will provide relevant guidance to the international legal community. Christophe Bernasconi | Secretary General Only Use Official For Chronology of the Service Handbook All of the documents referred to (unless otherwise specified) are available on the website of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (www.hcch.net). February 2009 Only The Special Commission on the practical operation of the Service Convention “encourages the Permanent Bureau to commence work, in due course and subject to available resources, on an updated edition of the Practical Handbook on the Operation of the Service Convention.”1 March – April 2009 Use The Council on General Affairs and Policy of the Hague Conference takes note of the Conclusions & Recommendations of the Special Commission on the practical operation of the Service Convention and once again expresses its support for the broad range of activities being undertaken by the Permanent Bureau in the area of Post-Convention Services. The Council also recognises the additional work arising from the Conclusions & Recommendations of the Special Commission on the practical operation of the Service Convention (including the preparation of the Service and Evidence Handbooks).2 November 2013 Official The Permanent Bureau circulates a questionnaire regarding case law and practice to National and Contact Organs of the Members, and to the non-Member Contracting States to the Service Convention, in preparation for the 2014 meeting of the Special Commission. For December 2013 A draft Annex on the use of information technology in the operation of the Service Convention of the 4th edition of the Service Handbook is circulated to the members of a Working Group (composed of experts from Members of the Hague Conference and an international organisation). 1 Conclusion and Recommendation (C&R) No 41 of the 2009 Special Commission (CS). 2 C&R of the 2009 meeting of the Council on General Affairs and Policy of the Hague Conference. VI PRACTICAL HANDBOOK ON THE OPERATION OF THE SERVICE CONVENTION | CHRONOLOGY January – February 2014 The Working Group meets in The Hague to review inter alia the draft Annex on the use of information technology in the operation of the Service Convention of the 4th edition of the Handbook. At the end of February 2014, the Permanent Bureau circulates a revised Annex to the members of the Working Group for written comments. May 2014 A full draft of the 4th edition (reflecting the outcome of the Working Group meeting, the written comments received from Working Group members on the revised Annex and including additional updates in case law and practice) is completed and submitted to the Special Commission prior to its meeting in The Hague (20-23 May 2014).3 The Special Commission invites the Permanent Bureau to finalise the text of the Handbook, before submitting it to the Drafting Committee of the Special Commission and then to all participants of the Special Commission meeting once again for comment, after which it is to be submitted to the Council on General Affairs and Policy.4 Only June – December 2014 In co-operation with the Drafting Committee, the Permanent Bureau updated the draft Service Handbook, incorporating the outcome of the discussions at the Special Commission meeting, as well as case law and practice reported by States throughout 2014 in response to the Questionnaire. Use February 2015 Through a written procedure, the Special Commission endorses the final draft of the Handbook, which is then submitted to the Council on General Affairs and Policy for approval. March 2015 Official The Council on General Affairs and Policy formally approves the updated edition of the Service Handbook (as well as the new edition of its counterpart relating to the Evidence Convention).5 The Service and Evidence Handbooks are thus the first publications prepared by the Permanent Bureau to have been formally approved by the Council on General Affairs and Policy. For 3 Prel. Doc. No 2 of the 2014 SC. 4 C&R No 5 of the 2014 SC. 5 C&R No 12 of the 2015 meeting of the Council on General Affairs and Policy of the Hague Conference. List of participating experts The Permanent Bureau acknowledges the experts who were members of either the Working Group on the Practical Handbook of the Operation of the Service Convention, or of the Drafting Committee of the Special Commission on the practical operation of the Service Convention, or both. Only Australia Malta Mr William BRYDIE-WATSON Ms Daniela SULTANA Ms Carmen MIRAGAYA Mexico Brazil UseMs Maria de Lourdes OCHOA NEIRA Mr Arnaldo José ALVES SILVEIRA Netherlands Canada Mr Derek B. LUGTENBERG Ms Mariam KHAN Ms Valérie SIMARD Paraguay Mr José Miguel TORRES China, People’s Republic Mr José Raúl TORRES KIRMSER Mr James DING Mr Xiaobin SHI Philippines Ms Leah ENRIQUEZ Czech Republic Official Ms Maria Regina ADORACION Ms Pavla BELLOŇOVÁ FELOMINA European Union Portugal Mr Pál SZIRÁNYI Ms Ana Vitoria AZEVEDO FinlandFor Russian Federation Ms Maija LEPPÄ Ms Julietta ARZUMANYAN Ms Elena KULIKOVA France Ms Elizaveta POMYAKSHEVA Mr Adrien FLESCH Slovakia Germany Mr Miloš HAŤAPKA Ms Kirsten GRAUMANN Ms Bärbel KOHAKE South Africa Ms Stefanie PLÖTZGEN-KAMRADT Ms Thanisa NAIDU Latvia Sweden Ms Vineta LECINSKA-KRUTKO Ms Cecilia RIDDSELIUS VIII PRACTICAL HANDBOOK ON THE OPERATION OF THE SERVICE CONVENTION | PARTICIPATING EXPERTS Switzerland Consultants Ms Silvia MADARASZ-GAROLLA Mr William FRITZLEN (United States of America) United Kingdom Mr Patrick GINGRAS (Canada) Mr Nic TURNER Observer United States of America Mr Mathieu CHARDON Ms Ada BOSQUE (International Union of Judicial Officers) Venezuela Ms Hilda Y. MARTINEZ Ms Ayesta J. REBOLLEDO Only Use Official For Introduction The Service Convention stands as a major international treaty in cross-border civil procedure.
Recommended publications
  • In the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
    Case 2:19-cv-00608-PLD Document 12 Filed 12/23/19 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HABAS SINAI VE TIBBI GAZLAR ISTIHSAL ) A.S., ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs ) Civil Action No. 19-608 ) Magistrate Judge Dodge INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ) KNOWLEDGE COMPANY, INC. and INTEKNO ) TEKNOLOJI TRANSFER SANAYI VE TICARET ) A.S., ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal A.S. brings this action against Defendants International Technology & Knowledge Co., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Intekno U.S.”), and Intekno Teknoloji Transfer Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S., a Turkish corporation (“Intekno Turkey”). In this breach of contract action, Plaintiff asserts that Defendants failed to deliver certain goods, forcing Plaintiff to obtain them elsewhere at an increased cost. Plaintiff alleges that the agreement that forms the basis of its claim is governed by the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods or Pennsylvania law. (Compl. ¶¶ 17-21.) Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Alternative Service on Intekno U.S. (ECF No. 9). In its motion, Plaintiff seeks leave to serve Intekno U.S. by electronic mail upon its Chief Executive Officer, Halil Kulluk, who is presently in Istanbul, Turkey. At the direction of the Court, Plaintiff submitted a brief in further support of its motion. (ECF No. 11). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. After Plaintiff and Defendants agreed to the agreed to the contractual terms regarding the sale and delivery of the graphite electrodes, Intekno U.S issued a ProForma Invoice consistent with the agreed-upon sale terms in April 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions Lists.Xls
    La Société Guernesiaise Papers appearing in the Transactions In chronological order For author order or subject order click on tab at bottom of page. Annual Section reports are not included. Complete printed indexes covering the years 1882 to 1980 can be purchased from the office of La Société. Many issues of the Transactions and reprints of papers are also available for purchase. Decade: 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 YEAR PAGE VOL PART TITLE AUTHOR 1882-1889 35 I 1 The geology of Guernsey Hill, E 1882-1889 45 I 1 The ferns of Guernsey Derrick, G T 1882-1889 61 I 1 The butterflies of Guernsey and Sark Luff, W A 1882-1889 74 I 1 On the occurrence of calcite in Guernsey Collenette, A 1882-1889 78 I 1 An excursion to Icart Point Derrick, G T 1882-1889 83 I 1 On changes in the relative level of sea and land Derrick, G T 1882-1889 89 I 1 List of flowering plants found in Guernsey Derrick, G T 1889 123 I 2 On the Genus Isoetes Marquand, E D 1889 128 I 2 Excursion to Herm Derrick, G T 1889 133 I 2 The Flora of Herm Marquand, E D 1889 139 I 2 History of Herm Lee, G E 1889 143 I 2 Excursion to Lihou Randell, J B 1889 148 I 2 Crustacea Sinel, J The Nocturnal Macro-Lepidoptera of Guernsey, Alderney, 1889 155 I 2 Luff, W A Sark, and Herm Return to top YEAR PAGE VOL PART TITLE AUTHOR On the correlation and relative ages of the rocks of the 1890 30 II 1 de la Mare, C G Channel Islands 1890 37 II 1 A dredging excursion off Guernsey Spencer, R L 1890 41 II 1 Some notable oral equipments in the vertebrata Rose,
    [Show full text]
  • Hague Service Convention Contracting States
    Hague Service Convention Contracting States someScummy Memphis Robb alwaysand ritualized wyted hishis BerioYugoslavia if Terence so sturdily! is cardiovascular Luther flagellating or beseech quickest. lieve. Awing Townie misrelate Hague Evidence Convention in strain in Brazil LawsofBrazil. Contracting Parties to this Convention that air also Members of the HCCH ie the. Notably the Convention of 15 November 1965 on south Service department of. New Hague Convention Seeks to Facilitate Global JD Supra. Exclude the application of 2nd paragraph story article 4th which provides that a contracting state machine accept all letter of influence in either English or. So a person or appear. 11 See Article 10 of the Hague Service Convention which states Provided are State. The New Hague Convention on Enforcement of Foreign Judgements. The Hague Service Convention provision for service about a Central Authority held the. The Hague Convention on the Services Abroad of mammal and Extrajudicial. Consequently application for example, for exclusive jurisdiction by using for a converse benefit parties for your new hampshire. Hague Service Convention ABC Legal. What neither the Hague Convention service with process? Under the Hague Convention each contracting State a as Italy shall. When CORE failed to fever to wear service appeal process ARCO secured a final default. California Supreme Court Confirms That the Gibson Dunn. FileHague Service Convention contracting partiespng. HCCH 14 Status table. Convention relating to following Procedure The stone of Law. Hague Service Convention Wikipedia. Hague Convention does not permit service truck an independent process server 3 that. The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction also. You contract where theevidence is through an adequate explanation must go.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Guernsey Appendices
    UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Guernsey: Appendices. Author: Dr Charles David Guernsey Biological Records Centre, States of Guernsey Environment Department & La Societe Guernesiaise. More information available at: www.biologicalrecordscentre.gov.gg This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Guernsey chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to Guernsey is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5743 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 Commissioned by the States of Guernsey Environment Department for the Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prepared by Dr C T David Guernsey Biological Records Centre August 2010 1 Contents Appendix 1: Bailiwick of Guernsey – Location and Introduction ............................. 3 Location, Area, Number of Islands, Population 3 Topography 4 Main economic sectors 4 Constitutional Position 4 Appendix 2: Multilateral Environmental Agreements. ............................................... 5 Appendix 3: National Legislation ................................................................................ 8 Planning 8 Ancient Monuments 8 Coast and beaches 8 Land 8 Fauna 8 Flora 9 Trees 9 Import/export 9 Marine environment 9 Waste 9 Water 9 Appendix 4: National Strategies ................................................................................ 11 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • ?Verheid.Nl > Hoog Contrast > Dutch
    Overheid.nl I Treaty Database The guide to Dutch government information and seruices ?verheid.nl > Hoog contrast > Dutch ITETfiEITEII¡EúIGTiETN Mrtz-rE m¡Gr It¡r EIITIE|I SEEffi ¡EEI¡IEEFJ¡?t€ Convention on the service abroad of iudicial and Act¡ons extrajudicial documents in civil or corñmercial matters Print g ffi Part¡es with reservat¡ons, declarat¡ons and objections Download XML tá Reservat¡ons / Subscribe to depositary Party Declarat¡ons Objections notifications E < Home Argentina Yes NO Treaty Australia Yes No > Data llltrãilllIilt¡ Belgium Yes No ffi Botswana Yes No > Recent modifications Bulga ria Yes No Depos¡tary Canada Yes No > Authorities China Yes No > Depositary communications > Not¡fications Colombia Yes No Croatia Yes NO Cyprus Yes No Czech Republic Yes NO Czechoslovakia (<01-01-1993) Yes NO Denmark Yes NO Egvpt Yes No Estonia Yes No Finland Yes No France Yes NO Germany Yes NO Greece Yes NO H ungary Yes No Iceland Yes No India Yes No Ireland Yes No Israel Yes No Italy Yes No Japan Yes No Kazakhstan Yes NO Kuwait Yes No Latvia Yes NO L¡thuania Yes NO Luxembourg Yes No Macedon¡a, the former Yugoslav Yes No Republic of Malta Yes NO htþs://treatydatabase.overheid.nl/en/Verdrag,rDetails/004235 b Overheid.nl I Treaty Database Mexico Yes No Moldova Yes No Monaco Yes No Montenegro Yes NO Netherlands, the K¡ngdom of the Yes No Norway Yes No Pakistan Yes No Poland Yes No Portugal Yes No Republic of Korea, the Yes No Romania Yes No Russian Federat¡on Yes No Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Yes No San Marino Yes NO Serbia Yes No Seychelles Yes No Slovakia Yes No Slovenia Yes No Spain Yes Yes Sri Lanka Yes NO Sweden Yes NO Sw¡tzerland Yes NO Turkey Yes No Ukraine Yes No United K¡ngdom Yes No United States of America Yes No Venezuelâ Yes No V¡etnam Yes No o2-02-2001 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Alderney in Autumn
    Alderney in Autumn Naturetrek Tour Report 25 – 29 September 2015 Southern Coast path by Dave Shute Rock Spurrey by Dave Shute Hedgehog leucistic by Dave Shute Checking the moth traps by Martin Batt Report compiled by Dave Shute and images by Martin Batt and Dave Shute Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Alderney in Autumn Tour Report Tour Participants: Martin Batt (leader & historian/naturalist) Dave Shute (leader & naturalist) David Wedd (entomologist) & Anne-Isabelle Boulon (naturalist) Annabel Finding (Alderney Tours minibus) 15 Naturetrek clients. Day 1 Friday 25th September Apart from Gary, who had unexpectedly arrived a day early(!), our group arrived on two separate flights from Southampton. So the first eight touched down in fine weather around 10am, to be greeted by Martin, and were soon aboard Annabel’s Alderney Tours minibus for the short transfer to the Braye Beach Hotel, our wonderfully-appointed base for the tour. As it was changeover day, I was engaged with our earlier group this morning. After a welcome coffee and snack, everyone visited the main town of St.Anne, a short uphill drive from Braye. Here, Martin led a guided tour of the attractions, from the cobbled Victoria Street (named in honour of the Queen’s affection for the island), through the impressively large 19th century church and very well laid out museum, to the public library which houses the beautiful final panel of the apparently incomplete Bayeux tapestry. Depicting the coronation of William the Conqueror after the Battle of Hastings this was recently crafted by the Alderney community and was subsequently displayed alongside the original in Bayeux in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Hague Service Convention
    Morningstar Investigations & Process Servers Hague Service Convention The Hague Service Convention is a federal treaty which entered into force in the United States in 1964. The Hague Service Convention was created to provide a standardized method of service of process between signatory countries. It is the most widely recognized method of international process service and has even been added as a required method in some U.S. service statutes. However, of the approximately 200 (+/-) countries of the world, only 68 are signatory to the Hague Service Convention. Of the at least 39 different “Hague Conventions”, Hague Convention #14 is the "Service" Convention and is solely for the service of "notice" documents between signatory countries (summons, complaint, and associated documents) but is not meant to be used for service of a subpoena or any other document requesting a form of evidence (with the exception of document subpoenas for service in Japan). If we are retained to effect Hague service on your behalf, we will: o prepare all necessary treaty documents and facilitate service being properly effected, either through the appropriate central authority or our appointed agent (as in expedited Hague service where available) o provide, at no extra cost, supporting affidavits, and assistance, for obtaining extensions of time to serve, informing the applicable court or client of status (when available) etc. o send all documents abroad using international courier (such as UPS, FEDEX, etc.) Common Controversy Upon accession to the Hague Service Convention, a signatory country is allowed the opportunity to voice objections to, impose restrictions on, or issue a requirement relating to, any of the Articles of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Guernsey, 1814-1914: Migration in a Modernising Society
    GUERNSEY, 1814-1914: MIGRATION IN A MODERNISING SOCIETY Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Rose-Marie Anne Crossan Centre for English Local History University of Leicester March, 2005 UMI Number: U594527 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U594527 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 GUERNSEY, 1814-1914: MIGRATION IN A MODERNISING SOCIETY ROSE-MARIE ANNE CROSSAN Centre for English Local History University of Leicester March 2005 ABSTRACT Guernsey is a densely populated island lying 27 miles off the Normandy coast. In 1814 it remained largely French-speaking, though it had been politically British for 600 years. The island's only town, St Peter Port (which in 1814 accommodated over half the population) had during the previous century developed a thriving commercial sector with strong links to England, whose cultural influence it began to absorb. The rural hinterland was, by contrast, characterised by a traditional autarkic regime more redolent of pre­ industrial France. By 1914, the population had doubled, but St Peter Port's share had fallen to 43 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • OIJA Guidance on Service Abroad in U.S. Litigation
    U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division Office of International Judicial Assistance Last updated 10/1/18 The Office of International Judicial Assistance (“OIJA”), acting through its contractor ABC Legal (formerly known as PFI), plays a very limited role with regard to requests for service of documents from the United States to be served upon persons or entities in foreign countries. Below we summarize some permissible methods for service abroad, but it is the sole responsibility of parties within the United States to make all arrangements for the service of documents outside of the United States. I. SERVICE ABROAD PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION The Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial or Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (“Hague Service Convention”) provides for effective, expeditious, and inexpensive service of U.S. judicial documents in civil or commercial cases on individuals, companies, or foreign governments and their instrumentalities abroad, to the extent the foreign government permits service under the Convention. This Convention cannot be used to serve documents related to criminal cases. Under U.S. law, attorneys representing parties in courts within the United States are competent authorities to prepare and submit requests for service going to foreign Central Authorities. See Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”); Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978); see also Charleston Aluminum, LLC v. Ulbrinox S. De R.L. de S.V., No. 3:12–2389–MBS, 2013 WL 152895 (D.S.C. Jan. 15, 2013); Coombs v. Iorio, No. CIV-06-060- SPS, 2008 WL 4104529 (E.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Counsel Memorandum 200143032
    CONCLUSION: 1. The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, 20 U.S.T. 1361; 658 U.N.T.S. 163; T.I.A.S. No. 6638; 28 U.S.C.A.; 16 I.L.M. 1339 (1977) (the “Service Convention”) provides for service of an IRS administrative summons on a US citizen residing in the United Kingdom, because such summons is considered an extrajudicial document under the Convention. A properly served summons may be enforceable in the US District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to IRC §§ 7604 and 7701(a)(39) . 2.a. The summons may be personally served by the Revenue Service Representative (the “RSR”) or the Assistant Revenue Service Representative (the “ARSR”) stationed at London, after being authorized by the Central Authority of the United Kingdom under the Service Convention. 2.b. The requesting office would forward the request in the form prescribed by the Service Convention, and annexed to Articles 3, 5, 6, and 7, along with the Summons, Form 2039, and a brief description of the nature of investigation, and the proposed line of inquiry to this office. The service of the summons in the United Kingdom will be processed by the London RSR of the Office of Director, International (LMSB), and coordinated by this office and the office of Assistant Chief Counsel (Collection, Bankruptcy and Summonses). 2.c. The office of the Revenue Service Representative in London is an appropriate place for requiring the witness to appear for the summons interview. FACTS: We have been requested to determine if a US citizen or resident residing in the United Kingdom, who is believed to have information relevant to IRS audits, may be served with an IRS administrative summons in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • International Service of Process by Mail Under the Hague Service Convention
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 13 Issue 3 1992 International Service of Process by Mail Under the Hague Service Convention L. Andrew Cooper University of Michigan School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation L. A. Cooper, International Service of Process by Mail Under the Hague Service Convention, 13 MICH. J. INT'L L. 698 (1992). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol13/iss3/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT NOTES INTERNATIONAL SERVICE OF PROCESS BY MAIL UNDER THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION L. Andrew Cooper* The United States is one of twenty-eight States bound by the 1965 Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents (the Convention).I The Convention provides several methods through which a plaintiff in one Member State may effect service of process upon a defendant in another. There is a dispute as to whether these methods include service of process by direct mail. Some courts and commentators interpret the Convention to permit a plaintiff to effect service by mailing service documents directly to the defendant abroad. Other courts and commentators maintain that the Convention does not authorize service in this manner.
    [Show full text]
  • A Working List of the Birds of the Channel Islands
    A Working List of the Birds of the Channel Islands Glyn Young, Mark Lawlor & Jill Watson This Working List includes details of all those bird species recorded in the (British) Channel Islands of Jersey (including Les Ecrehous and Les Minquiers), Guernsey (including Herm, Jethou and Lihou), Alderney (including Burhou and the Casquets) and Sark that have been accepted by the islands’ respective ornithological committees. Some recent records may not be included, as the relevant committee has not yet verified them. Further details of each species or of individual records can be found in published reports or by contacting the committees directly (see below). Records are updated annually after individual islands’ records committees have discussed the preceding year’s reports. The report is currently updated to 31st December 2008 and the authors are grateful to Mark Atkinson (Alderney), Mick Dryden (Jersey) and Tony Paintin (Jersey) for their help in maintaining this list. Status To date it has been difficult for the authors to standardise the status of birds in the four islands as interpretation has often differed and coverage has been patchy. As a guideline, however, the following categories have been used to describe status: Resident - recorded throughout the year Migrants and non-breeding visitors Breeding species Accidental - each record is recounted Occasional - has bred in most years Occasional - individuals out of season Rare - 1-10 pairs breed in most years Rare - 5-20 records Scarce - 11-50 pairs breed in most years Scarce - 21-50 individuals Common - 51-500 pairs breed in most years Common - 51-100 individuals Very common - 500+ pairs breed in most years Very common - 101-1,000 individuals Abundant - more than 1,000 pairs breed in Abundant - more than 1,000 most years individuals In practice, some of the categories have been further elaborated (e.g.
    [Show full text]