DOCSLIB.ORG

Women in Prison: Seeking Justice Behind Bars

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Women in Prison: Seeking Justice Behind Bars U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS WOMEN IN PRISONSEEKING JUSTICE BEHIND BARS BRIEFING REPORT U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS FEBRUARY 2020 Washington, DC 20425 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an Catherine E. Lhamon, Chairperson independent, bipartisan agency established Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chairperson* by Congress in 1957. It is directed to: Debo P. Adegbile Gail L. Heriot • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are Peter N. Kirsanow being deprived of their right to vote by reason of David Kladney their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or Karen Narasaki** national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Michael Yaki • Study and collect information relating to Mauro Morales, Staff Director discrimination or a denial of equal protection of * Term ended 12/05/2019 the laws under the Constitution because of race, **Term ended 11/29/2019 color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW or national origin, or in the administration of justice. Washington, DC 20425 • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information (202) 376-8128 voice in respect to discrimination or denial of equal TTY Relay: 711 protection of the laws because of race, color, www.usccr.gov religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress. • Issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws. 142 U.S.C. §1975a. Women in Prison: Seeking Justice Behind Bars Briefing Report Before The United States Commission on Civil Rights Held in Washington, D.C. Briefing Report February 2020 [This page intentionally left blank] UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS 1331 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 1150 Washington, DC 20425 www.usccr.gov Letter of Transmittal February 26, 2020 President Donald J. Trump Vice President Mike Pence Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi On behalf of the United States Commission on Civil Rights (“the Commission”), I am pleased to transmit our briefing report, Women in Prison: Seeking Justice Behind Bars. The report is also available in full on the Commission’s website at www.usccr.gov. This report examines the civil rights of women in United States prisons. The population of women in prison has increased dramatically since the 1980s, and this growth has outpaced that of men in prison, yet there have been few national-level studies of the civil rights issues incarcerated women experience. The Commission studied a range of issues that impact incarcerated women, including deprivations of women’s medical needs that may violate the constitutional requirement to provide adequate medical care for all prisoners; implementation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA); and the sufficiency of programs to meet women’s needs after release. The Commission also examined disparities in discipline practices for women in prison compared with men, and the impacts of incarcerated women being placed far from home or having their parental rights terminated. The Commission majority approved key findings including the following: Many prison policies and facilities are not designed for women or tailored to their specific needs. Rather, many policies were adopted from men’s prison institutions without evaluating their application to women’s prison institutions. Incarcerated women report extremely high rates, and much higher rates than men, of histories of physical, sexual, and mental trauma. Notwithstanding federal statutory legal protections such as the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA) and the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), aimed at protecting incarcerated people, many incarcerated women continue to experience physical and psychological safety harms while incarcerated and insufficient satisfaction of their constitutional rights. Department of Justice (DOJ) litigation against prison systems involving sexual abuse among other wrongs has secured important changes to safeguard incarcerated women’s rights. Classification systems that are not calibrated for gender-specific characteristics have been shown to classify incarcerated women at higher security requirement levels than necessary for the safety and security of prisons; women classified at higher security levels may receive fewer vocational and educational, community placement, and reentry opportunities than they would have received had they been classified at lower security levels. Many incarcerated women are placed at facilities far from their families, limiting visitation opportunities. Many prison policies do not prioritize family visits, such as by permitting extremely limited family visitation hours that often do not reflect distances visiting family must travel. Some prisons provide adequate healthcare specific to women, such as gynecological and prenatal care, while others do not. The high rates at which incarcerated women report past trauma results in the need for mental health care and treatment while incarcerated. Sexual abuse and rape remain prevalent against women in prison. Incarcerated women who report sexual assault have experienced retaliation by their institutions and prison personnel in violation of the law. The Commission majority voted for key recommendations, including the following: DOJ should continue to litigate enforcement of the civil rights of incarcerated women in states that violate these mandates and the rights of incarcerated women. Prison officials should adopt validated assessment tools, currently available, to avoid inaccurately classifying incarcerated women to a higher security level than appropriate. Prison officials should give strong preference to placing incarcerated women in as close proximity as possible with location of their family, provide free video and low- cost phone services to incarcerated persons, and not ban in-person visits for non-safety reasons. Prison officials should implement policies to address women’s specific healthcare needs, including gynecological and prenatal care, as is constitutionally required. Prisons should have adequate mental health care staff and treatment programs available to meet the needs of the many incarcerated women with mental health challenges, such as past trauma. Congress should enact stricter penalties for non-compliance with PREA standards focused on inmate safety and consistently appropriate funding sufficient to ensure correctional agencies comply with PREA. Prisons should implement evidence-based, trauma-informed discipline policies to avoid harsh punishments for minor infractions, and recognizing the significant harms that can result from placement in restrictive housing. Prisons should ensure restrictive housing is not used against people of color, LGBT people, and people with mental health challenges in a discriminatory manner. We at the Commission are pleased to share our views, informed by careful research and investigation as well as civil rights expertise, to help ensure that all Americans enjoy civil rights protections to which we are entitled. For the Commission, Catherine E. Lhamon Chair [This page intentionally left blank] TABLE OF CONTENTS i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 3 Highlighted Findings ............................................................................................................... 5 Highlighted Recommendations ............................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ...................................................... 9 Women in Prison Across U.S. States ..................................................................................... 12 Do Women in Prison Have Distinct Needs and Experiences from Men in Prison? ................. 18 Gender Differences in Offense Type ................................................................................. 18 Socioeconomic Differences Between Women and Men in Prison ...................................... 20 Gender Differences with Experiences of Trauma, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse .... 23 Prison Policies and Gender Differences Among Inmates ................................................... 24 Race, Ethnicity, and Women in Prison .............................................................................. 26 LGBT Women in Prison .................................................................................................... 29 LGBT Women in Prison, Housing, and Placement ............................................................ 31 Overview of Applicable Federal Legal Protections for Women in Prison .............................. 37 The Eighth Amendment .................................................................................................... 39 The Fourteenth Amendment .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thinking Intersectionally About Women, Race, and Social Control Kimberlé W
    From Private Violence to Mass Incarceration: Thinking Intersectionally About Women, Race, and Social Control Kimberlé W. Crenshaw ABSTRACT UCLA LAW REVIEW UCLA LAW The structural and political dimensions of gender violence and mass incarceration are linked in multiple ways. The myriad causes and consequences of mass incarceration discussed herein call for increased attention to the interface between the dynamics that constitute race, gender, and class power, as well as to the way these dynamics converge and rearticulate themselves within institutional settings to manufacture social punishment and human suffering. Beyond addressing the convergences between private and public power that constitute the intersectional dimensions of social control, this Article addresses political failures within the antiracism and antiviolence movements that may contribute to the legitimacy of the contemporary punishment culture, both ideologically and materially. AUTHOR Kimberlé W. Crenshaw is Professor of Law at UCLA and Columbia Law Schools. I have benefited tremendously from the comments, suggestions, and helpful insights of Luke Charles Harris, Devon Carbado, George Lipsitz, Barbara Tomlinson, Gary Peller, Joseph Doherty, Stephanie Bush-Baskette, Monique Morris, and the participants of the African American Policy Forum’s Social Justice Writers Workshop. Allen Secretov, Scott Dewey, Ezra Corral, and Stephanie Plotin provided excellent research assistance. I would also like to express my gratitude to the UCLA Law Review for sponsoring this symposium, to the participants who shared their work and insights, and to my colleagues in the Critical Race Studies Program who contributed to the symposium’s success. Lastly, I would like to thank my faculty co-leads on this symposium, Jyoti Nanda and Priscilla Ocen, who worked tirelessly to see this important symposium come to fruition.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Rise of Carceral States Through the Lens of the Prisoners’ Rights Movement
    We Are Not Slaves: Rethinking the Rise of Carceral States through the Lens of the Prisoners’ Rights Movement Robert T. Chase In November 1966 Fred Arispe Cruz sat naked in a darkened cell in the solitary confine- Downloaded from ment wing of the O. B. Ellis Unit in the Texas state prison system. Cruz was a frequent visitor to solitary, but this particular stay seemed to him truly unjust, as the cause was the guards’ discovery of a copy of the U.S. Constitution in his cell. Cruz had been a prisoner in Texas since 1961, when he arrived at the Harlem Prison Farm on thirty-five-year- and http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/ fifteen-year convictions for aggravated robbery. Within his first year as a prisoner within the Texas Department of Corrections, Cruz continued legal work on his appeal and be- came one of the earliest inmate pioneers to learn law and act as a jailhouse lawyer. Texas prisoners who acted as their own attorneys wrote appeals and writs of habeas corpus for court-ordered intervention, seeking relief from what they argued were unjust and illegal detentions.1 Among his fellow prisoners, Cruz was known as one of those “writ writers,” but among prison administrators he was simply called an “agitator.” He became an avid student of the by guest on November 20, 2016 law, mastering legal precedents, rules, and procedures, and his reputation among other in- mates, particularly among Chicano prisoners and black Muslim prisoners, became such that they sought him out for help on their appeals processes. As Cruz’s fame grew between 1962 and 1966, so did the animosity of his captors, who increasingly viewed him as a threat to the prison system’s otherwise-comprehensive control and power.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Original U.S. Government Works
    Dignam, Brett 8/7/2014 For Educational Use Only PUNISHING PREGNANCY: RACE, INCARCERATION, AND..., 100 Cal. L. Rev. 1239 100 Cal. L. Rev. 1239 California Law Review October, 2012 Article PUNISHING PREGNANCY: RACE, INCARCERATION, AND THE SHACKLING OF PREGNANT PRISONERS a1 Priscilla A. Ocen a2 Copyright (c) 2012 California Law Review, Inc., a California Nonprofit Corporation; Priscilla A. Ocen The shackling of pregnant prisoners during labor and childbirth is endemic within women's penal institutions in the United States. This Article investigates the factors that account for the pervasiveness of this practice and suggests doctrinal innovations that may be leveraged to prevent its continuation. At a general level, this Article asserts that we cannot understand the persistence of the shackling of female prisoners without understanding how historical constructions of race and gender operate structurally to both motivate and mask its use. More specifically, this Article contends that while shackling affects female prisoners of all races today, the persistent practice attaches to Black women in particular through the historical devaluation, regulation, and punishment of their exercise of reproductive capacity in three contexts: slavery, convict leasing, and chain gangs in the South. The regulation and punishment of Black women within these oppressive systems reinforced and reproduced stereotypes of these women as deviant and dangerous. In turn, as Southern penal practices proliferated in the United States and Black women became a significant percentage of the female *1240 prison population, these images began to animate harsh practices against all female prisoners. Moreover, this Article asserts that current jurisprudence concerning the Eighth Amendment, the primary constitutional vehicle for challenging conditions of confinement, such as shackling, is insufficient to combat racialized practices at the structural level.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Violence and the Intersectionality of Race/Ethnicity and Gender
    VOLUME 18, ISSUE 1, PAGES 106–121 (2017) Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society E-ISSN 2332-886X Available online at https://ccjls.scholasticahq.com/ Prison Violence and the Intersectionality of Race/Ethnicity and Gender Kerryn E. Bell Eastern Washington University A B S T R A C T A N D A R T I C L E I N F O R M A T I O N Minority men and women are significantly impacted by mass incarceration. Mass incarceration has also resulted in a growth in prison violence, and previous studies in this area have focused on individuals and not their interconnected statuses. This study specifically considers the role of intersectional criminology and the commitment of prison violence in a large western state on female inmates. Intersectional criminology is a theoretical approach that enables a critical look at the impact of individuals’ interconnected statuses in relation to crime. Findings suggest that an intersectional approach provides more definitive statistical results in the assessment of prison violence and show that minority females commit more violent infractions in prison than White women. As such, this study builds upon previous arguments that intersectionality should be more widely used in future research. Implications for the findings are discussed. Article History: Keywords: Received 12 July 2016 intersectionality, race/ethnicity, gender, prison, violence Received in revised form 22 December 2016 Accepted 04 January 2017 © 2017 Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society and The Western Society of Criminology Hosting by Scholastica. All rights reserved. Although incarceration rates in general have (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2015). However, when decreased since 2009,1 they are still a recognized the United States embarked on a policy of mass problem in the United States (see Carson, 2014).2 incarceration, few also considered the unintended Some scholars go so far as to argue that mass consequences that this change would have on minority incarceration has emerged as a system of racialized women (Chesney-Lind, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Prison in Oregon
    WOMEN IN PRISON IN OREGON DATA, PATHWAYS INTO INCARCERATION, AND CHARACTERISTICS OF WOMEN PRISONERS. BEN SCISSORS AND ALICE LUNDELL ABOUT OREGON JUSTICE RESOURCE CENTER OJRC is a Portland, Oregon, 501(c)3 nonprofit founded in 2011. We work to promote civil rights and improve legal representation for communities that have often been underserved in the past: people living in poverty and people of color among them. Our clients are currently and formerly incarcerated Oregonians. We work in partnership with other, like-minded organizations to maximize our reach to serve underrepresented populations, train public interest lawyers, and educate our community on civil rights and civil liberties concerns. We are a client-centered organization that uses integrative advocacy to achieve our goals. This strategy includes focused direct legal services, public awareness campaigns, strategic partnerships, and coordinating our legal and advocacy area to positively impact outcomes in favor of criminal justice reforms. WOMEN IN PRISON PROJECT The Women in Prison Project is a program of OJRC. We created the Project as the first and only program in Oregon to exclusively address the needs of women who are intersecting with the criminal justice system. Our goals are to ensure the criminal justice system treats women fairly, protects their health and safety, and makes it possible for them to successfully rejoin their communities when they are released. We do this through integrative advocacy: combining litigation, legislative and other reforms, and other policy and communications initiatives. For more information, contact Project Director and Attorney, Julia Yoshimoto, at [email protected]. www.ojrc.org “Women’s engagement in crime ..
    [Show full text]
  • Human Cattle: Prison Overpopulation and the Political Economy of Mass Incarceration
    Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science Volume 4 Article 3 5-10-2016 Human Cattle: Prison Overpopulation and the Political Economy of Mass Incarceration Peter Hanna San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Hanna, Peter (2016) "Human Cattle: Prison Overpopulation and the Political Economy of Mass Incarceration," Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science: Vol. 4 , Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31979/THEMIS.2016.0403 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis/vol4/iss1/3 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Justice Studies at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science by an authorized editor of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Human Cattle: Prison Overpopulation and the Political Economy of Mass Incarceration Abstract This paper examines the costs and impacts of prison overpopulation and mass incarceration on individuals, families, communities, and society as a whole. We start with an overview of the American prison system and the costs of maintaining it today, and move on to an account of the historical background of the prison system to provide context for the discussions later in this paper. This paper proceeds to go into more detail about the financial and social costs of mass incarceration, concluding that the costs of the prison system outweigh its benefits. This paper will then discuss the stigma and stereotypes associated with prison inmates that are formed and spread through mass media.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legacy of Supremacy: Prison, Power, and the Carceral Nation
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Winter 2017 A Legacy of Supremacy: Prison, Power, and the Carceral Nation Luke J. Hickey Western Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Hickey, Luke J., "A Legacy of Supremacy: Prison, Power, and the Carceral Nation" (2017). WWU Graduate School Collection. 554. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/554 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LEGACY OF SUPREMACY: PRISON, POWER, AND THE CARCERAL NATION By Luke J. Hickey Accepted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Kathleen L. Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chair, Dr. Kathleen Young Dr. Sean Bruna Dr. Shurla Thibou MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non- exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalk and Cheese: Australian Vs. Norwegian Prisons
    Chalk and Cheese Australian vs. Norwegian Prisons by Irina Dunn 1Published by Community Justice Coalition 2017 © Community Justice Coalition / Irina Dunn 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted by any person or entity, including internet such as engines or retailers, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying (except under the statutory exceptions provisions of the Australian Copyright Act 1968), recording, scanning or by any information storage and retrieval system without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. The fact that this book is published online does not mean that any part of it can be reproduced without frst obtaining written permission: copyright laws do still apply. Inquiries should be directed to the author. First published by Community Justice Coalition in 2017 PO Box 386 Broadway Sydney NSW 2007 Australia Phone (02) 9283 0123 www.communityjusticecoalition.org National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Creator: Irina Dunn, author Title: Chalk & Cheese: Australian vs. Norwegian Prisons ISBN: 9780648140405 (ebook) Subjects: Criminal justice, Administrator of --Australia Criminal justice, Administration of --Great Britain Criminal justice, Administration of --Norway Criminal justice, Administration of --Netherlands Criminal justice, Administration of --Cross-Cultural-Studies Cover designed by Nick Freeman Breakout Media Communications Edited by Irina Dunn 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Policy Reform in Colombia 9
    Table of Contents Executive Summary / 7 Introduction / 13 The publication of this report was supported by the Washington Prison from a Gender Perspective: Incarceration’s Effects on Women Convicted of Drug Crimes / 21 Office on Latin America and Open Society Foundations. Drug Policies and Gender: An Overdue Analysis / 22 ISBN 978-958-59496-9-0 Digital edition The Profile of Women Imprisoned for Drug Crimes in Colombia / 23 Colombia’s Prison Crisis and Its Impact on Women / 29 Photography Jessamine Bartley-Matthews Adam Schaffer Public Policy Recommendations: The Need for More Human and Effective Measures / 53 Understanding the Human Side of the Drug Problem / 54 Layout and cover Alejandro Ospina Changing Criminal Sanctions / 60 Understanding and Minimizing Prison’s Differentiated Translation Morgan Stoffregen and Disproportionate Effects on Women / 70 Printed by References / 77 Ediciones Antropos Ltda. First edition Bogotá, Colombia, October 2016 This document is available at http://www.dejusticia.org Women’s Voices from Prison: When Women Are Used as “Bait” for International Trafficking / 26 Marginal Links to Criminal Organizations / 27 When Criminal Defense Works against Defendants / 31 The Accused Cannot Reduce Their Sentences / 32 Creative Commons License 2.5 What Are Living Conditions Like in Prison? / 34 Attribution – Non-commercial – Share alike The Erosion and Weakening of Family Ties / 38 Long-Distance Mother-Child Relationships / 39 Dejusticia, 2016 Carrera 24 No. 34–61, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia Life After Prison and the Possibility of Relapse 1 / 42 Telephone: (+57 1) 608 3605 Life After Prison and the Possibility of Relapse 2 / 45 www.dejusticia.org Executive Summary n recent decades, the dominant model for responding to the drug problem has been the “war on drugs,” which relies on penal law to criminalize, prohibit, and penalize conduct associated with all stages of the drug trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Gail Heriot
    Peer-to-Peer Violence and Bullying 181 DISSENTING STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER GAIL HERIOT, WITH WHICH COMMISSIONERS PETER KIRSANOW AND TODD GAZIANO CONCUR I. Background to the Report: A Twice-Told Tale Rather Than an Investigation This report has been a disappointment—though its shortcomings can in no way be attributed to our staff. The responsibility must lie with the Commission itself. Switching topics at the last possible moment made it impossible for the report to be anything but an uncritical re-telling of the positions of the Department of Education and the Department of Justice—along with a very brief nod to a few of the objections to those positions.1 Nothing that can be dignified with the term ―investigation‖ has occurred here. No useful new evidence is uncovered. No serious analysis has been engaged in.2 In the Commission‘s charter, Congress requires us to produce at least one report each year critiquing the manner in which a federal agency enforces civil rights laws.3 It is for that reason that the Commission is frequently referred to as a ―civil rights watchdog.‖4 Our job is to be fair and independent critics. 1 The brief discussion of the objections to the policy is contained almost exclusively in the last chapter of the report. 2 I agree with my colleagues Commissioners Todd Gaziano and Peter Kirsanow that none of the empirical studies on bullying cited in the report is relevant to the issues before the Commission. See Joint Dissent and Rebuttal of Commissioners Gaziano and Kirsanow. These studies do not show that the kind of bullying for which school districts can be held legally accountable for is widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • How Women Have Become the Fastest-Growing Population in the American Carceral State Spencer K
    Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law Volume 23 | Issue 2 Article 1 2018 “Lock Her Up!” How Women Have Become the Fastest-Growing Population in the American Carceral State Spencer K. Beall Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Recommended Citation Spencer K. Beall, “Lock Her Up!” How Women Have Become the Fastest-Growing Population in the American Carceral State, 23 Berkeley J. Crim. L. (2018). Link to publisher version (DOI) https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38X34MS09 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals and Related Materials at Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law by an authorized administrator of Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beall: Lock Her Up! ISSUE 23:2 SPRING 2018 “Lock Her Up!” How Women Have Become the Fastest-Growing Population in the American Carceral State Spencer K. Beall* The majority of discourse on American mass incarceration attempts to explain the outsize populations in jails and prisons as the result of a political war against a specific group of people (e.g. against a certain race, against the poor), rather than against crime itself. Less attention has been paid to women, even though they are the fastest- growing population in the carceral state. Since the 1970s, law enforcement has imprisoned women at twice the rate of men, despite relatively static female criminality patterns. Rampant sexual abuse, inadequate female healthcare, and pitiless shackling during labor and childbirth are among the consequences of rapidly locking women into a corrections system established for—and designed by—men.
    [Show full text]