An Investigation of Backgrounds in the DEAP-3600 Dark Matter Direct Detection Experiment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
An Investigation of Backgrounds in the DEAP-3600 Dark Matter Direct Detection Experiment by Laurelle Maria Veloce A thesis submitted to the Department of Physics, Engineering Physics & Astronomy in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Queen's University Kingston, Ontario, Canada October 2013 Copyright c Laurelle Maria Veloce, 2013 Abstract Astronomical and cosmological observations reveal that the majority of the matter in our universe is made of an unknown, non-luminous substance called dark matter. Many experimental attempts are underway to directly detect particle dark matter, which is very difficult to measure due to the expected low interaction rate with normal matter. DEAP-3600 is a direct dark matter search experiment located two kilometres underground at SNOLAB, in Sudbury, Ontario. DEAP-3600 will make use of liquid argon as the detector material, which scintillates as charged particles pass through. The work presented here is an investigation of expected background sources in the DEAP detector. Because DEAP-3600 is a noble liquid-based experiment, a thin film of [1,1,4,4]- tetraphenyl-[1,3]-butadiene (TPB) is coated on the detector walls to shift the scin- tillation peak from the UV to visible regime for detection. However, alphas passing through TPB produce scintillation signals which can mimic recoil events. Because scintillation properties can change with temperature, we have conducted an investiga- tion of alpha-induced TPB scintillation at temperatures ranging from 300 K to 3.4 K. We were able to characterize the light yield and decay times, and demonstrated that these background events should be distinguishable from true recoil events in liquid argon, thus enabling DEAP-3600 to achieve higher dark matter sensitivity. i Additionally, we investigate the performance of the liquid argon purification sys- tems, specifically the activated charcoal used for radon filtration. Previous mea- surements with the DEAP prototype experiment have demonstrated the necessity of removing radon from the argon prior to filling the detector, due to the release of contaminates from the argon storage systems. Charcoal radon filters are extremely efficient, however, if the emanation rate of the charcoal is too high, there is the pos- sibility of re-contamination. We performed a measurement of the radon emanation rate of a charcoal sample using a radon emanation and extraction system at Queens University. We demonstrated that the emanation rate of the charcoal was consistent with zero. We also show that the number of residual radon atoms which reach the detector would not be an issue for DEAP-3600. ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I must thank Dr. Tony Noble. It is no exaggeration to say that without his expertise, guidance, and support, this thesis would not have been possible. Thanks also to the DEAP collaboration for their help and advice, and of course for the opportunity to work on such an exciting project. Thank you especially to Marcin Kuzniak for his invaluable help with the TPB scintillation analysis (and with the painful process of debugging my Root macros), and also to Wolfgang Rau for his advice and guidance with the radon emanation process. Special thanks also to Tina Pollmann, Mark Ward, Mark Boulay, David Bearse, Rob Gagnon, and Bei Cai. My time at Queen's University was much more enjoyable thanks to the antics of my officemates: Kedar Page, Matt Walker, and Alvine Kamaha; and my fellow DEAP graduate students Corina Natais, Paradorn Pasuthip, and Ben Broerman. Finally, my sincerest thanks to my parents, grandparents, and family for always believing in me. And, of course, thank you to Alex for always being there! iii Contents Abstract i Acknowledgments iii Contents iv List of Tables vii List of Figures viii Glossary of Terms xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Dark Matter: A Review 3 2.1 Evidence . 4 2.1.1 Galaxy Clusters . 4 2.1.2 Galactic Rotation Curves . 5 2.1.3 The Cosmic Microwave Background . 8 2.2 Dark Matter Candidates . 9 2.2.1 Dark Matter Detection . 13 2.3 Direct Detection . 15 2.3.1 Dark Matter Recoil Signal . 16 2.3.2 Velocity Distribution and Local Density . 19 2.3.3 Kinematics . 20 2.3.4 Cross Section and Nuclear Form Factors . 22 2.3.5 Detector Response . 24 2.4 Expected Dark Matter Signatures . 25 2.5 Experimental Considerations . 27 Chapter 3: Dark Matter Detection with DEAP-3600 33 3.1 Liquid Argon as a Target Material in Dark Matter Detectors . 34 iv 3.1.1 Pulse Shape Discrimination . 37 3.1.2 Photon Yield . 38 3.2 DEAP-1 . 41 3.3 DEAP-3600 . 44 3.3.1 Backgrounds in DEAP-3600 . 46 Chapter 4: Apha-Induced Scintillation Properties of Tetraphenyl Butadiene 51 4.1 Overview of Organic Scintillation Theory . 52 4.1.1 Radiative Excitation . 55 4.1.2 Radiative Relaxation . 55 4.1.3 Non-Radiative Relaxation . 55 4.2 The Tetraphenyl Butadiene Wavelength Shifter . 58 4.3 The TPB Sample . 60 4.4 Experimental Method . 63 4.5 Analysis and Results . 65 4.5.1 Data Reduction . 65 4.5.2 Single Photoelectron Charge . 72 4.5.3 Detected Light and Light Yield . 80 4.5.4 Pulse Shapes . 83 4.5.5 Prompt Fraction . 89 4.6 Consequences and Impact on DEAP-3600 . 91 4.6.1 Consequences of Light Yield Temperature Dependence . 91 4.6.2 Consequences of Time Constant and Fprompt Temperature De- pendence . 92 Chapter 5: Construction and Testing of the DEAP-3600 Radon Trap 95 5.1 Radon as a background in DEAP 1 . 96 5.2 Radon Filtration . 98 5.3 The DEAP-3600 Carbon Trap Radon Filter . 99 5.4 Emanation of Saratech R Charcoal at Queen's University . 104 5.4.1 The Emanation Apparatus . 104 5.4.2 Emanation and Extraction Procedures . 107 5.5 Emanation Results . 110 5.6 Expected 222Rn Contamination . 113 Chapter 6: Summary and Conclusions 115 Bibliography 119 Appendix A: Additional Cryostat Runs and Data Analysis 132 v A.1 Verification of TPB Sample Stability . 132 A.2 Blank Quartz Sample . 132 A.3 Baseline Effects . 133 A.4 Ringing . 135 A.5 A Deeper Look into Pulse Width . 138 A.5.1 Temperature . 138 A.5.2 Timing . 139 A.6 Systematic Uncertainties . 139 A.7 Correlations in the Pulse Shape Fits . 142 A.8 Additional Light Yield and Pulse Shape Plots . 143 vi List of Tables 2.1 Canonical values for galactic halo and velocity parameters . 20 3.1 Relevant parameters for liquid noble WIMP detection experiments . 36 3.2 Background budget for a DEAP-3600 three year run . 46 3.3 Summary of background leakage for DEAP-3600 . 48 4.1 Summary of organic scintillation processes and timescales . 58 4.2 Most probable values of light distributions at different temperatures . 82 4.3 Time constants at different temperatures . 86 5.1 DEAP-3600 radon trap specifications . 100 5.2 Emanation results of radon emanation for Saratech R activated charcoal111 A.1 Systematic errors for pulse shape fit parameters . 142 vii List of Figures 2.1.1 The Bullet Cluster . 5 2.1.2 Rotation curve of NGC 6503 . 6 2.1.3 Sky Map of the Planck satellite . 8 2.1.4 Power spectrum of the Planck satellite . 9 2.2.1 Dark matter detection pathways . 15 2.3.1 WIMP rate and energy threshold . 17 2.4.1 Annual modulation . 26 2.4.2 Diurnal modulation . 27 2.5.1 Dark matter detection experimental signals . 28 2.5.2 Nuclear vs. electronic recoil events . 30 2.5.3 Muon flux according to underground laboratory . 31 2.5.4 Sensitivities and Projected Sensitivities of key experiments . 32 3.1.1 Elastic scattering between DM particle and LAr nuclei . 35 3.1.2 Demonstration of pulse shape discrimination using Fprompt . 39 3.2.1 Schematic of the DEAP-1 detector . 42 3.3.1 Schematic of the DEAP-3600 detector . 45 3.3.2 Relevant decay chains . 47 3.3.3 Schematic of surface background events . 49 viii 4.1.1 Molecular structure of TPB . 53 4.1.2 Aromatic molecular energy levels and transitions . 54 4.2.1 Neutron recoil pulse shape from DEAP-1 vs. TPB alpha scintillation pulse shapes . 60 4.3.1 TPB evaporation system . 61 4.3.2 Depth of TPB sample . 62 4.4.1 Photograph of TPB sample . 64 4.4.2 Experimental set up schematic . 65 4.5.1 Detected light distribution at 87 K (for one PMT) prior to the imple- mentation of data-cleaning cuts. 66 4.5.2 Pulse Shape at 87 K prior to the implementation of data-cleaning cuts. 67 4.5.3 The first photon arrival time distributions at 87 K. 68 4.5.4 Difference in first photon arrival times between the two PMTs at 87 K. 69 4.5.5 The charged weighted mean event arrival time for channel 0, averaged over all photons at 87 K. ............................ 70 4.5.6 Detected light distribution for 87 K, after pile-up events were removed. 71 4.5.7 Pulse shape at 87 K, after pile-up events were removed. 71 4.5.8 Histogram of late integral charge . 74 4.5.9 Scatter plot of integral charge vs. arrival time . 75 4.5.10Late charge according to pulse width . 76 4.5.11Single photon distribution with different online thresholds . 77 4.5.12Pulse shapes according to threshold . 78 4.5.13Correct Single Photoelectron . 79 4.5.14Pulse Shape at 87 K divided by the singlePE . 80 ix 4.5.15Detected light distribution at 87 K . 81 4.5.16Detected light vs.