DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Protected Areas in Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Protected Areas in Washington Marine Protected Areas in Washington Recommendations of the Marine Protected Areas Work Group to the Washington State Legislature December 2009 Marine Protected Areas in Washington: Recommendations of the Marine Protected Areas Work Group to the Washington State Legislature December 2009 F. Brie Van Cleve Greg Bargmann Michele Culver The MPA Work Group Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, Washington 98501 Cover photo: Smith and Minor Islands. Photo courtesy of Kurt Beardslee, Wild Fish Conservancy. Back cover photo: Capt Disappointment State Park. Photo by Brie Van Cleve. Suggested citation: Van Cleve, FB, G Bargmann, M Culver, and the MPA Work Group. Marine Protected Areas in Washington: Recommendations of the Marine Protected Areas Work Group to the Washington State Legislature. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA. This document does not declare, expand or diminish any rights, authorities, or legal obligations of the state and tribes. Nothing in this document shall be construed as a concession or waiver by any entity as to the claims, rights, or legal positions of others. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 MPA Work Group Creation, Purpose, and Membership .......................................................................... 6 Report Purpose and Audience .................................................................................................................. 7 Conservation Mandates and MPA Authorities in Washington State ........................................................ 8 History of MPAs in Washington ................................................................................................................ 8 MPA Work Group Methods .......................................................................................................................... 9 Summary of Inventory Results .................................................................................................................... 11 Assessment of Findings ............................................................................................................................... 15 I. Coordination and Consistency ....................................................................................................... 16 A. Goals ............................................................................................................................................... 17 B. Establishment Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 18 C. Management Practices ................................................................................................................... 18 D. Terminology .................................................................................................................................... 19 E. Monitoring Practices ....................................................................................................................... 19 II. Improved Integration ..................................................................................................................... 20 A. Science ............................................................................................................................................ 20 B. Local Governments and Nongovernmental Organizations ............................................................. 20 III. Improving Effectiveness ................................................................................................................ 21 A. MPA Networks ............................................................................................................................... 21 B. Performance Evaluation ................................................................................................................. 21 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 22 I. Coordination and Consistency ....................................................................................................... 22 A. Goals ............................................................................................................................................... 23 B. Establishment Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 23 C. Management Practices ................................................................................................................... 24 D. Terminology .................................................................................................................................... 24 E. Monitoring Practices ....................................................................................................................... 24 II. Improved Integration ..................................................................................................................... 25 A. Science ............................................................................................................................................ 25 B. Local Governments and Nongovernmental Organizations ............................................................. 26 III. Improving Effectiveness ................................................................................................................ 26 A. MPA Networks in Puget Sound ...................................................................................................... 26 B. Performance Evaluation ................................................................................................................. 27 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................. 27 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................................................... 32 Appendix 1: Inventory of Washington MPAs .............................................................................................. 35 Structure of the Inventory ...................................................................................................................... 35 Methods and Data Sources ..................................................................................................................... 35 Managing Agencies ................................................................................................................................. 36 Geographical Distribution of MPAs in Washington Waters .................................................................... 36 Protection Level ...................................................................................................................................... 37 Washington State Marine Protected Area Inventory ............................................................................. 38 Inventory Key .......................................................................................................................................... 41 Abbreviations used to Identify Organizations ........................................................................................ 43 Inventory Results .................................................................................................................................... 44 Agencies Involved with Creation and Management of MPAs ................................................................ 67 Literature Utilized ................................................................................................................................... 69 Appendix 2: Tribal Policy Statement ........................................................................................................... 70 Appendix 3: Summary of Management Practices....................................................................................... 73 National Park Service, Olympic National Park ........................................................................................ 73 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary .......... 74 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Complex ..................... 77 University of Washington, Friday Harbor Labs, San Juan County/Cypress Island Marine Biological Preserve .................................................................................................................................................. 80 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ........................................................................................ 82 Washington Department of Natural Resources ...................................................................................... 83 Washington Parks and Recreation Commission ..................................................................................... 85 Washington Department of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whidbey & Whidbey &
    5-2018 F m o o oe is oe l and info and W elds and woods. and elds f both through trails hiking C hidbey I amano slands.com ere are dog-friendly dog-friendly are ere T restaurant. a and shops, specialty galleries, Greenbank Farm Greenbank is publicly-owned farm is home to art art to home is farm publicly-owned is T – 9 9 from invading ships. invading from Sound Puget protect to forts three Fire”; of “Triangle region’s the e fort, featuring cannons, was part of of part was cannons, featuring fort, e T 1890’s. the in built fort a and rst lighthouse, Admiralty Head Lighthouse, Lighthouse, Head Admiralty lighthouse, rst f region’s the both to home ere is a Visitor Center located at Make Whidbey. Make at located Center Visitor a is ere T Fort Casey State Park State Casey Fort overlooking Puget Sound is is Sound Puget overlooking f blu is T - 8 8 Small shops and restaurants greet visitors along the main highway. highway. main the along visitors greet restaurants and shops Small is, for many, where they drive on the mainland, or where they depart. depart. they where or mainland, the on drive they where many, for is, stunning views. views. stunning Clinton and South Whidbey South and Clinton – Whidbey Island’s ferry gateway gateway ferry Island’s Whidbey – 18 18 and provides opportunities to explore parks, beaches, trails and and trails beaches, parks, explore to opportunities provides and Reserve is home to historic farms, the seaport town of Coupeville, Coupeville, of town seaport the farms, historic to home is Reserve towering forests, and camping options, including cabins.
    [Show full text]
  • PARKS and RECREATION COMMISSION 2021 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices Shown Without Tax)
    WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2021 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices shown without tax) Peak Season Shoulder Season Winter Apr 1 - May 14 May 15 - September 15 November 1 - March 31 & Sept 16 - Oct 31 Weekends & Weekends Weekends & Park & Facility Weeknights Holidays Weeknights & Holidays Weeknights Holidays BATTLE GROUND LAKE STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 69 69 55 55 BAY VIEW STATE PARK Cabins 1-4 79 79 69 69 55 55 Cabins 5-6 89 89 79 79 65 65 BELFAIR STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 59 69 55 55 BROOKS MEMORIAL STATE PARK Wall Tents 45 45 40 40 40 40 CAMA BEACH STATE PARK See end of table. CAMANO ISLAND STATE PARK See end of table. CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 64 74 64 74 Yurts 79 79 64 74 64 74 Lighthouse Keeper 339 447 229 303 229 303 Ass't Lighthouse Kpr 241 318 164 217 164 217 COLUMBIA HILLS STATE PARK Rustic Cabins 50 50 50 50 50 50 CONCONULLY STATE PARK Cabin C1 79 79 64 69 60 60 Cabin C2-C5 69 69 54 59 54 54 DASH POINT STATE PARK Cabins 80 80 70 70 65 65 DECEPTION PASS STATE PARK C1 Ben Ure Island 99 99 79 79 69 69 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2020 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices shown without tax) Peak Season Shoulder Season Winter Apr 1 - May 14 May 15 - September 15 November 1 - March 31 & Sept 16 - Oct 31 Weekends & Weekends Weekends & Park & Facility Weeknights Holidays Weeknights & Holidays Weeknights Holidays C2-C6 Campground 79 84 69 79 55 55 C7 Cornet Bay 100 100 100 100 100 100 C8 Cornet Bay 120 120 120 120 120 120 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK Cabins
    [Show full text]
  • Eyes Over Puget Sound
    Publication No. 21-03-070 Eyes Over Puget Sound Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info Picture by: Jesse Miller 2020 in Review Up-to-date observations of visible water quality conditions in Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca Summary conditions at a glance Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info The COVID pandemic of 2020 resulted in an information UNIT COVID gap in our work between March and September. Our field Stories crew slowly has restored full capacity and data collection, and EOPS photography resumed in September. Critters Critters in the sediment and water are a testament that and life continues in beautiful ways, and it’s worth going for Divers a dive in Puget Sound when the water is clear. Climate Despite wildfires and a lot of smoke during a dry late and summer, precipitation and flows of major rivers were as Streams expected, or even above normal, for most of the year. MARINE MONITORING MONITORING MARINE With volunteers sending in images on the water we can say that 2020 was a productive year for Puget Sound. TERM Aerial - photos Schools of herring were abundant, Noctiluca blooms were big and numerous, and large amounts of decaying organic material washed onto beaches. LONG Picture by: Jessica Alexanderson Editor: Dr. Christopher Krembs, editorial assistance: Valerie Partridge. PSEMP Marine Waters Workgroup Report of 2018 Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info Follow-up on the conditions that led up to 2019, in Puget Sound’s comprehensive marine waters report.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Public Beach List
    2021 Public Beach List - Special Rules The following is a list of popular public beaches with special rules because of resource needs and/or restrictions on harvest due to health concerns. If a beach is not listed below or on page 2, it is open for recreational harvest year-round unless closed by emergency rule, pollution or shellfish safety closures. Click for WDFW Public Beach webpages and seasons 2021 Beach Seasons adopted February 26, 2021 Open for Clams, Mussels & Oysters = Open for Oysters Only = For more information, click on beach name below to view Jan1- Jan15- Feb1- Feb15- Mar1- Mar15- Apr1- Apr15- May1- May15- Jun1- Jun15- Jul1- Jul15- Aug1- Aug15- Sep1- Sep15- Oct1- Oct15- Nov1- Nov15- Dec1- Dec15- beach-specific webpage. Jan15 Jan31 Feb15 Feb28 Mar15 Mar31 Apr15 Apr30 May15 May31 Jun15 Jun30 Jul15 Jul31 Aug15 Aug31 Sep15 Sep30 Oct15 Oct31 Nov15 Nov30 Dec15 Dec31 Ala Spit No natural production of oysters Belfair State Park Birch Bay State Park Dash Point State Park Dosewallips State Park Drayton West Duckabush Dungeness Spit/NWR Tidelands No natural production of oysters Eagle Creek Fort Flagler State Park Freeland County Park No natural production of oysters. Frye Cove County Park Hope Island State Park Illahee State Park Limited natural production of clams Indian Island County Park No natural production of oysters Kitsap Memorial State Park CLAMS AND OYSTERS CLOSED Kopachuck State Park Mystery Bay State Park Nahcotta Tidelands (Willapa Bay) North Bay Oak Bay County Park CLAMS AND OYSTERS CLOSED Penrose Point State Park Point
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Worden State Park Fort Worden State Park
    $ Q ! B % > B ! > ! ! ¼ ! ! D ! $ ! ¼ ! ¼ % ¼ ! ! ¼% $ ! ¼ % % !$ ! ! ! ! %% $¼ $ ¼ % ! ¼ ¼ % % % % ¼ % % % ¼$ % % ¼ > ¼ $ ! ! ¼ ! ! ¼ !! ¼ % ¼ % Q % ¼ %$ B $ ¼ ! ! ! ! % $ ¼ % ! : ! ¼ ! ! ¼ % $ % ¼ ¼ % % % ¼ D $ : > B % > % % ¼ % ! ! !$ ¼ % $ % B > ! % D ¼ D > > $ % B % : $ North Sound North Sound/Fort Worden State Park Fort Worden State Park Cascadia Marine Trail Fort Worden State Park Take a walk along the 11,000 feet of beach or hike up the bluffs to take in a Number of Sites: Overflow Camping: bird's-eye view at the entrance to Puget Sound. Be sure to take a flashlight 3 In the rest of campground and explore the haunted house-like maze of the underground passageways. Port Townsend is a popular destination and the park hosts many conferences including several musical Water: Sanitation Facilities: workshops (Centrum's Festival of American Fiddle Tunes, Jazz Port Townsend, and the Port Available in the day-use area N of the Toilets opposite of pier and showers at Townsend Acoustic Blues Festival. pier and across the road campground; open year-round Natural History: Extras: Ownership: # Mingle with intertidal plants and animals indigenous to Puget Sound at the Port Townsend Picnic areas, food concessions in day-use Washington State Parks and Recreation Marine Science Center. The Marine Exhibit at the end of the pier houses touch pools andCoupeville area and Marine Science Center aquaria highlighting local marine habitats. On shore, a current Natural History Exhibit is ! Fees: Fire Restrictions: "Learning# from Whales...the! story of Hope," which inlcudes a fully reconstructed Orca Ebey's Landing SP $12/night for up to 8 in site Fireplaces available skeleton. ^ ! Known Hazards: Special Considerations: Whidbey ^ Currents N of Pt. Wilson are potentially Very popular day-use beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Parks Adaptation Plan
    WASHINGTON STATE PARKS ADAPATION PLAN June 2019 ©UW Climate Impacts Group, aerial support provided by LightHawk. Prepared by The University of Washington, Climate Impacts Group In Partnership with The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Acknowledgments The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the members of the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission staff who participated in project workshops and document review. Washington State Parks Project Lead: Lisa Lantz, Parks Development Division Manager Participating Parks staff, listed in alphabetical order: Joelene Boyd Michael Hankinson Laura Moxham Steve Brand Chelsea Hamer Matt Niles Jay Carmony Chelsea Harris Jessica Norton David Cass Peter Herzog Melinda Posner Jon Crimmins Dave Jaquish Brian Patnode Andrew Fielding John Keates Erik Plunkett Nikki Fields Linda Kunze Shari Silverman Erik Folke Lisa Lantz Mike Sternback Colleen Foster Jessica Logan Kira Swanson Edward Girard Alex McMurry Jamie Van De Vanter Jason Goldstein Dan Meatte Doug Vazquez Derek Gustafson Larry Mallo Brian Yearout Dan Hahn Dustin Madden University of Washington Climate Impacts Group Harriet Morgan Crystal Raymond Meade Krosby Funding Funding for this effort was provided by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. Recommended citation: Morgan, H., Raymond, C. 2019. Washington State Parks Adaptation Plan. A collaboration of the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and the University of Washington Climate Impacts Group. Image Citations Cover page image: ©UW Climate Impacts Group, aerial support provided by LightHawk. Section header images: Executive Summary | Image Source: Cama Beach State Park, Washington. Credit: Photo licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 Section 1 | Image Source: Lake Wenatchee, Lake Wenatchee State Park, Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutions Researched As Potential Zimfest Venues
    Venues that have been researched as potential Zimfest sites (from 2013 on) Oregon ● Reed College, Portland – They are committed to Chamber Music NW Summer Festival June to July and cannot accommodate Zimfest at the same time. Dorms go offline in August so there is no summertime date possible. ● Lewis & Clark, Portland – no acceptable concert venue, too expensive ● Portland State University – urban campus with heavy summer school schedule, few acoustically isolated breakout rooms available, no good marketplace/outdoor stage site ● Willamette University, Salem – Only possible concert venue a gym with possible noise curfew issues ● Pacific University, Forest Grove (Portland outskirts) – no acceptable concert venue, facilities doubtful for a group our size. ● Linfield College, McMinnville (north of Monmouth) – per person per day fees too expensive for Zimfest budget ● U of Oregon, Eugene – Had been negotiating for 2015 or 2016 but was more expensive than WOU. Re-opening negotiations is possible. ● Oregon State University, Corvallis - No one has approached them since Zimfest was last there in 2010. Returning there is possible but many found the dorm rooms and cafeteria food not as attractive as other sites. Washington ● Seattle University, Seattle – a definitive no; they cannot accommodate our afternoon concerts and workshop “noise” in their dense urban campus. ● University of Washington, Seattle – likely too expensive even if we got the sponsorship of a student group. Many rules and regulations, including prohibition against advertising events in the Student Union off-campus. Perhaps arrange room and board there if we found an off-campus concert venue? ● Seattle Pacific University, Queen Anne, Seattle – too small to accommodate our activities or concerts BUT could potentially provide room and board if we had activities close by (such as Seattle Center?) ● St.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Photography Made Easy
    Underwater Photography Made Easy Create amazing photos & video with by Annie Crawley IncludingIncluding highhigh definitiondefinition videovideo andand photophoto galleriesgalleries toto showshow youyou positioningpositioning andand bestbest techniques!techniques! BY ANNIE CRAWLEY SeaLife Cameras Perfect for every environment whether you are headed on a tropical vacation or diving the Puget Sound. These cameras meet all of your imaging needs! ©2013 Annie Crawley www.Sealife-cameras.com www.DiveIntoYourImagination.com Edmonds Underwater Park, Washington All rights reserved. This interactive book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher, Dive Into Your Imagination, LLC a company founded by Annie Crawley committed to change the way a new generation views the Ocean and themselves. Dive Into Your Imagination, Reg. Pat. & Tm. Off. Underwater Photography Made Easy shows you how to take great photos and video with your SeaLife camera system. After our introduction to this interactive book you will learn: 1. Easy to apply tips and tricks to help you create great images. 2. Five quick review steps to make sure your SeaLife camera system is ready before every dive. 3. Neutral buoyancy tips to help you take great underwater photos & video with your SeaLife camera system. 4. Macro and wide angle photography and video basics including color, composition, understanding the rule of thirds, leading diagonals, foreground and background considerations, plus lighting with strobes and video lights. 5. Techniques for both temperate and tropical waters, how to photograph divers, fish behavior and interaction shots, the difference in capturing animal portraits versus recording action in video. You will learn how to capture sharks, turtles, dolphins, clownfish, plus so much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Current!
    Welcome to the Current! Well, here comes Fall! Summer is slowing down and the cooler air is coming in. Leaves are starting to change here and there....and the rain is back. Make sure you come and check out the Park during this cool, sometimes wet season - it is a great place to visit rain or shine! This month in the Current learn about the bridge painting project happening now, a recap of our summer programs and some more history of the Park! Across the bridge by Elle Tracy Photo by Cindy Elliser Beginning in August, 2019, the Washington State Department of Transportation began a two-year project to restore and repaint the Deception Pass bridge – the only link for Whidbey Island residents on an off the island, unless, of course, you have a jet at your disposal. The existing paint work was completed more than 20 years ago, and with salt, wind and wear, the corrosion repair and paint work is necessary to support the resident and tourist traffic, estimated to be about 20,000 vehicles daily. Then there’s the foot traffic…. The temporary metal poles you see rising from the exterior barriers, support containment tarps under the bridge that prevent repair debris from dropping into the water. Containment tarps, photo by Cindy Elliser The project will shut down in the late fall for the winter, to begin again in the spring of 2020. Completion of the work is scheduled for fall of 2020. During work periods, you’ll hear unusual noise during the day, and quieter work noise overnight, when the bridge span is reduced to one lane of traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Workshop Summary Report Salish Sea Fish Assemblage Workshop September 18th 2018 Seattle, Washington Prepared by Zoe van Duivenbode Introduction Changes in the composition and abundance of fish assemblages within the Salish Sea region have long been a topic of interest for management, as they can result in a variety of possible consequences associated with species/population management, habitat conservation, and ecological shifts. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and SeaDoc Society organized a workshop to gather managers, researchers, and policy-makers involved in Salish Sea fish assemblages to share and discuss evidence of fish community change, impacts of change on species and ecosystem recovery, and to align management priorities and identify research needs. Further, the idea for a workshop originally was identified within the Endangered Species Act Recovery Plan for yelloweye rockfish and bocaccio of the Puget Sound/Georgia Basin (NMFS 2017)1. It became clear that assessing rockfish assemblage change without the context of assessing available information on full fish assemblage change would be insufficient for addressing recovery needs. The goal of the workshop was to identify relevant time-series data, evaluate current research, and discuss how existing efforts may contribute to future management strategies. In addition to the host agencies, workshop participants represented a collection of agencies and organizations including the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Puget Sound Restoration Fund, Seattle Aquarium, Samish Tribe’s Department of Natural Resources, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, Washington Department of Ecology, WDFW, University of Washington and more (see appendix for full list of participants and organizations).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Existing Facilities 2010 Plan Update: the Multi-Purpose Trail Inventory in the 2002 Plan Shows the Length of the Larry Scott Trail As 4.0 Miles
    Jefferson County Non-Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan 2010 Chapter 3: Existing Facilities 2010 Plan Update: The multi-purpose trail inventory in the 2002 Plan shows the length of the Larry Scott Trail as 4.0 miles. This included both trail segments constructed to the County’s adopted standards and the existing “usage” trail on the railroad grade. Since the adoption of the 2002 Plan, Jefferson County has constructed additional trail segments. The constructed trail length is now 4.4 miles. Volunteers have developed additional segments that extend the trail to S. Discovery Road at the Discovery Bay Golf Course. These segments, while useable, are not constructed to the County’s standards and are not included in the current inventory. The remaining trail right-of-way has been acquired to the Milo Curry Road / S. Discovery Road intersection near Four Corners. Construction of the remaining trail segments is planned for substantial completion in 2011. The trail length will then be 7.6 miles. The remainder of this chapter was not revised for the 2010 Plan update. It has been retained in the original 2002 Plan format. Jefferson County, Port Townsend, Port Ludlow, Port of Port Townsend, Washington State, National Forest and Park Services, and other public and private agencies have assembled a significant inventory of non-motorized transportation and recreational trail systems within Jefferson County. These systems provide a variety of on and off-road opportunities for walking, hiking, bicycling, horse, and hand launch boat activities throughout the county. The 1998 County Comprehensive Plan provides a very limited description of the non-motorized transportation and recreational trail facilities in Jefferson County.
    [Show full text]
  • Grays Harbor Juvenile Fish Use Assessment: 2012 Annual Report
    Grays Harbor Juvenile Fish Use Assessment: 2012 Annual Report Prepared for the Chehalis Basin Habitat Work Group February, 2013 Prepared by: Todd Sandell, James Fletcher, Andrew McAninch and Micah Wait Setting the net in Half Moon Bay, Grays Harbor Estuary, 2012 Sculpin displaying in a Wild Fish Conservancy “photarium”, April 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................7 1.2 Study Area ...................................................................................................................8 Specific Hypotheses: ......................................................................................................... 10 Section 2: Methods ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Habitat Inventory/ Sample Site Selection.................................................................... 12 2.2 Field Sampling Methodology ....................................................................................... 15 Data Recording/Water Quality Measures ............................................................................................ 17 2.3 Age Class Assignments ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]