ISRAEL Journal of ZOOLOGY
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. -
Three New Species of Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) from Pacific Islands, with Comments on the Rarity of Bopyrids Parasitizing Brachyurans
Zootaxa 4851 (1): 151–162 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4851.1.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2B3E81FE-D1DC-4087-B36D-80158A178638 Three new species of Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) from Pacific islands, with comments on the rarity of bopyrids parasitizing brachyurans JIANMEI AN1*, WANRUI ZHENG1§, JIELONG LIANG1§ & GUSTAV PAULAY2 1 School of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen, 041000, P. R. China [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-7327 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6040-5603 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4029-0412 2 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-7800, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4118-9797 *Corresponding author. § These two authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract Three new species of the bopyrid genus Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 are described from crabs collected on Pacific Islands: Scyracepon polynesiensis n. sp. from the Society Islands, S. pseudoliomerae n. sp. from the Mariana Islands, and S. biglobosus n. sp. from the Line Islands. The first two were found infesting Xanthias lamarckii and Pseudoliomera sp. (Xanthidae), a new host family for species of Scyracepon, and the last was found parasitizing Schizophrys aspera (Majidae). Scyracepon now includes 11 species, all but one known from single collections, infesting 12 host species in 9 brachyuran families. The discovery of three new species, each rare, suggests that crab parasites are undersampled, and further suggests that the low relative diversity of bopyrids known from brachyurans may partly reflect this undersampling. -
Epibiota of the Spider Crab Schizophrys Dahlak (Brachyura: Majidae) from the Suez Canal with Special Reference to Epizoic Diatoms Fedekar F
Marine Biodiversity Records, page 1 of 7. # Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2012 doi:10.1017/S1755267212000437; Vol. 5; e64; 2012 Published online Epibiota of the spider crab Schizophrys dahlak (Brachyura: Majidae) from the Suez Canal with special reference to epizoic diatoms fedekar f. madkour1, wafaa s. sallam2 and mary k. wicksten3 1Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt, 2Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, 41522, Ismailia, Egypt, 3Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3257, USA This study aims to describe the epibiota of the spider crab, Schizophrys dahlak with special reference to epizoic diatoms. Specimens were collected from the Suez Canal between autumn 2008 and summer 2009. Macro-epibionts consisted of the tube worm Hydroides elegans, the barnacles Balanus amphitrite and B. eburneus, the bivalve Brachidontes variabilis and the urochordate Styela plicata. Total coverage of macro-epibionts was greater on females’ carapaces than those of males with apparent seasonal variations. The highest coverage was noticed in spring and winter for both males and females. Sixty-five diatoms taxa were recorded as epibionts belonging to 25 genera. The maximal total averages of cell count were observed during summer and spring with the highest average of 10.9 and 4.4 × 103 cells dm22 for males and females, respect- ively. A single diatom taxon, Fragilaria intermedia, comprising 73.5% of all epizoic diatoms, was the most dominant species during spring, whereas Amphora coffeaeformis and Cocconeis placentula were the dominants during summer. The masking behaviour of S. -
Hesiod Theogony.Pdf
Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on. -
The Crustacea Decapoda (Brachyura and Anomura) of Eniwetok Atoll, Marshall Islands, with Special Reference to the Obligate Commensals of Branching Corals 1
The Crustacea Decapoda (Brachyura and Anomura) of Eniwetok Atoll, Marshall Islands, with special reference to the obligate commensals of branching corals 1 John S. GARTH Allan Hancock Foundation Univer5ity of Southern California 2 and Eniwetok Ma rine Biological Laboratory Introduction The brachyuran decapod crustaceans of the Marsh all Islands have been reviewed by Balss (1938) and by Miyake (1938, 1939). These reports stem from the German and Jap anese occupations, respect ively, the former being the result of the Pacific Exp edition of Dr. Sixten Bock, 1917-1918, the latter th e result of the Micronesia Expedition of Prof. Te iso Esaki, 1937-1938. According to Fosberg (1956, p. 1), J aluit Atoll was the headquarters of both the German and the Japan ese administrations, a fact that accounts for the preponderanc e of record s from the southern Marshall Isl ands. Additional coverage of the southern Marsh alls was provided by the 1950 Arno Atoll Expedition of the Coral Atoll Program of the Pa cific Science Board, the decapod crustaceans collected by Dr. R. W. Hiatt having been reported by Holthuis (1953). Carcinologically speak ing, the northern Marshalls ar e less well known, collections having been made only at Likieb Atoll by both Dr. Bock and Prof. Esaki and at Kwajalein Atoll by Prof . Esaki alone. Except for the shrimps, reported by Chace (1955), the extensive collections made in connection with Operation Crossroads in 1946- 1947, which includ ed Bikini, Rongelap, Rongerik, and Eniwetok atolls (Fosberg, 1956, p. 4), are at the U.S. Nationa l Museum awaiting stud y. -
Phylogenetics of the Brachyuran Crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda): the Status of Podotremata Based on Small Subunit Nuclear Ribosomal RNA
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45 (2007) 576–586 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogenetics of the brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda): The status of Podotremata based on small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA Shane T. Ahyong a,*, Joelle C.Y. Lai b, Deirdre Sharkey c, Donald J. Colgan c, Peter K.L. Ng b a Biodiversity and Biosecurity, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901 Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand b School of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore c Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia Received 26 January 2007; revised 13 March 2007; accepted 23 March 2007 Available online 13 April 2007 Abstract The true crabs, the Brachyura, are generally divided into two major groups: Eubrachyura or ‘advanced’ crabs, and Podotremata or ‘primitive’ crabs. The status of Podotremata is one of the most controversial issues in brachyuran systematics. The podotreme crabs, best recognised by the possession of gonopores on the coxae of the pereopods, have variously been regarded as mono-, para- or polyphyletic, or even as non-brachyuran. For the first time, the phylogenetic positions of the podotreme crabs were studied by cladistic analysis of small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA sequences. Eight of 10 podotreme families were represented along with representatives of 17 eubr- achyuran families. Under both maximum parsimony and Bayesian Inference, Podotremata was found to be significantly paraphyletic, comprising three major clades: Dromiacea, Raninoida, and Cyclodorippoida. The most ‘basal’ is Dromiacea, followed by Raninoida and Cylodorippoida. Notably, Cyclodorippoida was identified as the sister group of the Eubrachyura. -
Larval Growth
LARVAL GROWTH Edited by ADRIAN M.WENNER University of California, Santa Barbara OFFPRINT A.A.BALKEMA/ROTTERDAM/BOSTON DARRYL L.FELDER* / JOEL W.MARTIN** / JOSEPH W.GOY* * Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, USA ** Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA PATTERNS IN EARLY POSTLARVAL DEVELOPMENT OF DECAPODS ABSTRACT Early postlarval stages may differ from larval and adult phases of the life cycle in such characteristics as body size, morphology, molting frequency, growth rate, nutrient require ments, behavior, and habitat. Primarily by way of recent studies, information on these quaUties in early postlarvae has begun to accrue, information which has not been previously summarized. The change in form (metamorphosis) that occurs between larval and postlarval life is pronounced in some decapod groups but subtle in others. However, in almost all the Deca- poda, some ontogenetic changes in locomotion, feeding, and habitat coincide with meta morphosis and early postlarval growth. The postmetamorphic (first postlarval) stage, here in termed the decapodid, is often a particularly modified transitional stage; terms such as glaucothoe, puerulus, and megalopa have been applied to it. The postlarval stages that fol low the decapodid successively approach more closely the adult form. Morphogenesis of skeletal and other superficial features is particularly apparent at each molt, but histogenesis and organogenesis in early postlarvae is appreciable within intermolt periods. Except for the development of primary and secondary sexual organs, postmetamorphic change in internal anatomy is most pronounced in the first several postlarval instars, with the degree of anatomical reorganization and development decreasing in each of the later juvenile molts. -
A Critical Examination of Feminist Vvri Tings on the Matriarchy. a Thesis
CALIFORNIA STATE Ul'HV.ERSITY, NORTHRIDGE CHILDREN,, OF THE GODDESS: A Critical Examination of Feminist vvri tings on the Matriarchy. A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for ·the degree of tllaster of l'~rts in An ·thropo logy by Lynne Bean // June, 1976 The Thesis of Lynne Bean is approved: California S-tate University, Northridge ii l ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS l This paper is the result of the invaluable I I assistance and support of many individuals. I wish to I thank, particularly, Dr. Evalyn Michaelson, teacher and friend, for her patience and editorial advice. I am I also extremely grateful to Dr. Liucija Baskauskas and ! Dr. Jacqueline Lindenfeld for their useful and pertinent criticisms. Finally, to Shirley Anderson, Eliot Bean, r.inda and Bill Waters and Rudy Schneider, whose belief t.hat it could be done made this work possible, thank you. I 1 i I i i I I I l i l I i I ~ i ! l i I ! I l I i ______ Ij ~--~·---- ·-····--·---··---··-------~·--·-.-~----·-------··---- --~- iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. 1''-CKNOWLEDGEMENTS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• iii 1 2 .. ABS'IRACT •..... (J •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• v 3. INTRODUCTION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • 1 4. MYTH AS HISTORY: FOUNDATIONS OF' THE r'lATRIARCHY •••••••••••••••••••••• 9 5.. MY'I'I-I AND SYMBOL: A JUNGIAN VIEV\f OF WOMEN AND ~'lATRIARCHY •••••••••••• 20 6. N.YTI-IOLOGY AND !'"lA.TRIARCHY: EVIDENCE FROM SELECTED NYTHS •••••••••••••••••••••• 38 7 . .['.IJ...l\'I'RIARCHY AND WOMAN: A .FEMINIST VIEW ••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ ••••••••• 61 8. SHrvJMl\RY AND CONCLUSIONS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 85 9. "BIBLIOGRAPHY •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 91 iv ···-· --~---····- ...... ·-~----~----~·---~- -·-·~---~ .. ----·-·--- ········--- --··--- ~ --~--~ --· ·--- .---·~-·-·-· --·-------------h-•h--~---·-··-----··----~---------'-·----~-~-~-: i ABSTRACT CHILDREN OF THE GODDESS: . ~. A Critical Examination of Feminist Writings on the I Matriarchy. -
Systema Brachyurorum: Part I
THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................ -
Exhibition "Art and Myth. Gods at the Prado" at Caixaforum Barcelona
Press Release CaixaForum Barcelona From 15 October 2020 to 14 March 2021 Press Release The exhibition Art and Myth. Gods at the Prado was produced under the strategic alliance established between the Prado National Museum and ”la Caixa” Foundation CaixaForum Barcelona invites visitors to the Olympus of the gods Art and Myth. Gods at the Prado takes a wide-ranging look at Greco- Roman mythology and its representation throughout art history in paintings, sculptures and objects from the mid-first century BC to the mid-nineteenth century. Organised diachronically and based on 64 works from the collections of the Prado Museum, the exhibition features such key figures in art history as Rubens, Ribera and Zurbarán, among many others. This journey around the Olympus of the gods is divided into eight thematic sections and presents different representations of gods and interpretations of the same mythological episodes, enabling the visitor to appreciate the iconographic, geographic and chronological wealth of the Prado’s collections. Moreover, a number of elements, including an audiovisual featuring various voices from today’s world, seen in Barcelona for the first time, suggest comparisons between the classical discourse of the works on show with contemporary twenty-first-century myths. Art and Myth. Gods at the Prado. Dates: From 15 October 2020 to 14 March 2021 (open to the public from 4 pm on October 15). Place: CaixaForum Barcelona (Av. de Francesc Ferrer i Guàrdia, 6-8). Organised and produced by: ”la Caixa” Foundation and the Prado National Museum. Curator: Fernando Pérez Suescun, Head of Educational Content, Education Department, Prado National Museum. -
Larval Systematics of the Peninsular Malaysian Ranidae (Amphibia: Anura)
LARVAL SYSTEMATICS OF THE PENINSULAR MALAYSIAN RANIDAE (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) LEONG TZI MING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2005 LARVAL SYSTEMATICS OF THE PENINSULAR MALAYSIAN RANIDAE (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) LEONG TZI MING B.Sc. (Hons.) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2005 This is dedicated to my dad, mum and brothers. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to the many individuals and teams from various institutions who have contributed to the completion of this thesis in various avenues, of which encouragement was the most appreciated. They are, not in any order of preference, from the National University of Singapore (NUS): A/P Peter Ng, Tan Heok Hui, Kelvin K. P. Lim, Darren C. J. Yeo, Tan Swee Hee, Daisy Wowor, Lim Cheng Puay, Malcolm Soh, Greasi Simon, C. M. Yang, H. K. Lua, Wang Luan Keng, C. F. Lim, Yong Ann Nee; from the National Parks Board (Singapore): Lena Chan, Sharon Chan; from the Nature Society (Singapore): Subaraj Rajathurai, Andrew Tay, Vilma D’Rozario, Celine Low, David Teo, Rachel Teo, Sutari Supari, Leong Kwok Peng, Nick Baker, Tony O’Dempsey, Linda Chan; from the Wildlife Department (Malaysia): Lim Boo Liat, Sahir bin Othman; from the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM): Norsham Yaakob, Terry Ong, Gary Lim; from WWF (Malaysia): Jeet Sukumaran; from the Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia (EPU): Puan Munirah; from the University of Sarawak (UNIMAS): Indraneil Das; from the National Science Museum, Thailand: Jairujin Nabhitabhata, Tanya Chan-ard, Yodchaiy Chuaynkern; from the University of Kyoto: Masafumi Matsui; from the University of the Ryukyus: Hidetoshi Ota; from my Indonesian friends: Frank Bambang Yuwono, Ibu Mumpuni (MZB), Djoko Iskandar (ITB); from the Philippine National Museum (PNM): Arvin C. -
Bulfinch's Mythology
Bulfinch's Mythology Thomas Bulfinch Bulfinch's Mythology Table of Contents Bulfinch's Mythology..........................................................................................................................................1 Thomas Bulfinch......................................................................................................................................1 PUBLISHERS' PREFACE......................................................................................................................3 AUTHOR'S PREFACE...........................................................................................................................4 STORIES OF GODS AND HEROES..................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................7 CHAPTER II. PROMETHEUS AND PANDORA...............................................................................13 CHAPTER III. APOLLO AND DAPHNEPYRAMUS AND THISBE CEPHALUS AND PROCRIS7 CHAPTER IV. JUNO AND HER RIVALS, IO AND CALLISTODIANA AND ACTAEONLATONA2 AND THE RUSTICS CHAPTER V. PHAETON.....................................................................................................................27 CHAPTER VI. MIDASBAUCIS AND PHILEMON........................................................................31 CHAPTER VII. PROSERPINEGLAUCUS AND SCYLLA............................................................34