Case 20-50527 Doc 14 Filed 02/26/20 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In re: Chapter 11

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA AND Case No. 20-10343 (LSS) DELAWARE BSA, LLC,1 Jointly Administered Debtors.

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Adv. Pro. No. 20-50527 (LSS)

v.

A.A., et al,2 Re: A.D.I. 2, 4, 5

Defendants.

NOTICE OF FILING OF REVISED PROPOSED REDACTED VERSION OF VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on February 18, 2020, the Boy Scouts of America (the “BSA”), as the non-profit corporation that is a debtor and debtor-in-possession in the above- captioned bankruptcy case and plaintiff in this adversary proceeding filed the Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief (the “Complaint”) under seal.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, in connection with the filing of the Complaint under seal, the BSA filed the Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of an Order Authorizing the Debtors to File Under Seal (I) Exhibit A to the Complaint and (II) the Griggs Declaration (the “Motion to Seal”).3

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, in accordance with Local Rule 9018-1(d), and as set forth in the Motion to Seal, the BSA filed the Notice of Filing of Proposed Redacted Version of

1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, together with the last four digits of each Debtors’ federal tax identification number, are as follows: Boy Scouts of America (6300) and Delaware BSA, LLC (4311). The Debtors’ mailing address is 1325 W. Walnut Hill Ln., Irving, TX 75038.

2 A full list of the Defendants in this adversary proceeding, in redacted form to protect the privacy interests of abuse victims, is included as Exhibit A to the Complaint attached hereto. The Complaint, with unredacted versions of the exhibits thereto, will be served on each Defendant’s counsel.

3 Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in the Motion to Seal. Case 20-50527 Doc 14 Filed 02/26/20 Page 2 of 3

Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief (A.D.I. 5), and attached thereto as Exhibit A was a proposed redacted copy of the Complaint.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, in accordance with Local Rule 9018-1(d), and as set forth in the Motion to Seal, the Debtors have attached hereto as Exhibit A a revised proposed redacted copy of the Complaint, with redacted exhibits thereto.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

2

Case 20-50527 Doc 14 Filed 02/26/20 Page 3 of 3

Dated: February 26, 2020 MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP Wilmington, Delaware /s/ Eric W. Moats Derek C. Abbott (No. 3376) Andrew R. Remming (No. 5120) Joseph C. Barsalona II (No. 6102) Eric W. Moats (No. 6441) Paige N. Topper (No. 6470) 1201 North Market Street, 16th Floor P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1347 Telephone: (302) 658-9200 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

– and –

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Jessica C. K. Boelter (admitted pro hac vice) 787 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 839-5300 Email: [email protected] – and – SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP James F. Conlan (admitted pro hac vice) Thomas A. Labuda (admitted pro hac vice) Michael C. Andolina (admitted pro hac vice) William A. Evanoff Matthew E. Linder (admitted pro hac vice) One South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: (312) 853-7000 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

PROPOSED COUNSEL TO THE DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION

3 Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 1 of 95

EXHIBIT A

Redacted Complaint Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 2 of 95

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In re: Chapter 11

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA AND Case No. 20-10343 (___) DELAWARE BSA, LLC,1 Joint Administration Pending Debtors.

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Adv. Pro. No. 20-50527 (___)

v.

A.A., et al.,2

Defendants.

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

The Boy Scouts of America (the “BSA”), as the non-profit corporation that is a debtor and debtor-in-possession in the above-captioned bankruptcy case and plaintiff in this adversary proceeding, alleges for its Verified Complaint (the “Complaint”), upon knowledge of its own acts and upon information and belief as to other matters, as follows:

NATURE OF THE ACTION AND THE NEED FOR RELIEF

1. This is an adversary proceeding brought pursuant to Rules 7001(7) and 7065 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”) and sections 105(a) and

362 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). This adversary proceeding

1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, together with the last four digits of each Debtors’ federal tax identification number, are as follows: Boy Scouts of America (6300) and Delaware BSA, LLC (4311). The Debtors’ mailing address is 1325 W. Walnut Hill Ln., Irving, TX 75038. 2 A full list of the Defendants in this adversary proceeding is included in redacted form on Exhibit A attached hereto to protect the privacy interests of abuse victims. An unredacted version of this Complaint and Exhibit A hereto will be served on each Defendant’s counsel.

1 Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 3 of 95

seeks to extend the stay to enjoin the prosecution of the Pending Abuse Actions (as defined below) asserted against the BSA Related Parties (as defined below).

2. The BSA, together with certain independently incorporated local councils (the

“Local Councils”) and chartered organizations (the “Chartered Organizations”) that collectively operate under the BSA federal charter to deliver the Scouting program, currently are co- defendants in approximately 275 pending civil actions in state and federal courts around the country asserting personal injury abuse claims and causes of action (collectively, the “Pending

Abuse Actions”).3 The preliminary injunction sought in this Complaint applies to the Pending

Abuse Actions as against the BSA, to the extent not already covered by the automatic stay, and the claims and causes of action asserted against (i) non-debtor , a non-stock organization affiliated with the BSA (“LFL”), (ii) the non-debtor Local Councils, and (iii) all other non-debtor Chartered Organizations, to the extent they are named as co-defendants with the

BSA, a Local Council, and/or LFL in a Pending Abuse Action ((i), (ii), and (iii), collectively, the

“BSA Related Parties”).4

3. The BSA seeks a preliminary injunction to enjoin the continued prosecution of, and to extend the automatic stay to (if not otherwise subject to the automatic stay imposed by section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code), the Pending Abuse Actions as against the BSA and the

BSA Related Parties, for a period of 180 days from the issuance of the injunction.

4. The BSA seeks this preliminary injunction to avoid the irreparable harm to its estate and its prospects for reorganization that would occur if such litigation were allowed to continue unabated. As long as the Pending Abuse Actions are actively prosecuted against the

3 A list of the Pending Abuse Actions to be stayed is attached as Exhibit A hereto. The BSA only seeks to stay the Pending Abuse Actions to the extent they assert claims against the BSA or any of the BSA Related Parties identified on Exhibit B hereto. 4 As noted above, a list of BSA Related Parties is included in Exhibit B to this Complaint.

2

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 4 of 95

BSA and/or the BSA Related Parties, the value of the estate will continue to be rapidly eroded by

the staggering direct and indirect costs of litigation. The BSA spent more than $150 million on

settlements and legal and related professional costs from 2017 through 2019 alone.

5. In addition to these the hard costs, the prosecution of the Pending Abuse Actions would result in substantial and relentless pressure on the BSA’s operations and employees. For example, unless the stay is extended, the BSA would be required to engage in piecemeal litigation on behalf of the BSA Related Parties, even as it attempts to resolve claims against itself in its bankruptcy case. This involvement would include formulating litigation strategies, assisting in discovery, protecting against disclosure of privileged or otherwise protected documents, attending depositions, preparing witnesses and a myriad of other litigation tasks.

Moreover, the BSA and its employees would be distracted during this critical stage from, among other things, negotiating an equitable, global resolution of all of the Pending Abuse Actions and pursuing a plan of reorganization. Absent the requested relief, these monetary and non-monetary costs will continue, regardless of whether the Pending Abuse Actions proceed against only the

BSA Related Parties.

6. The requested injunction supports the strategy of the entire chapter 11

restructuring of the BSA and Delaware BSA, LLC (collectively, the “Debtors”). To that end,

along with the breathing spell the BSA seeks herein, the Debtors are in the process of seeking

other forms of relief in furtherance of their dual objectives in these chapter 11 cases: (a) the

timely and equitably compensating victims of abuse in Scouting and (b) ensuring that the BSA

emerges from bankruptcy with the ability to continue its vital charitable mission. Namely, the

Debtors are (a) establishing and populating an electronic data room with information regarding

the BSA’s and the Local Councils’ assets, including any restrictions on such assets; (b) assisting

3

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 5 of 95

in the formation of an ad hoc committee of Local Councils; (c) engaging an independent third-

party representative for future abuse claimants; (d) filing a motion seeking to establish a schedule

for this Court to hear and adjudicate any disputes regarding whether the BSA’s assets are

available to satisfy creditor claims; (e) filing a motion to establish comprehensive procedures for

providing notice of the applicable bar dates to the Debtors’ creditors and for creditors, including

abuse victims, to file proofs of claim; (f) filing a motion seeking the appointment of a sitting

bankruptcy judge as a mediator and the referral to mandatory mediation of all issues related to a

global settlement of abuse claims through a consensual plan of reorganization; (g) filing a plan of

reorganization that provides a framework for the negotiation of a global resolution of abuse

claims asserted against the BSA and a comprehensive restructuring of the BSA; (h) removing

any Pending Abuse Action that was pending in a state court as of the Petition Date to its

corresponding federal district court (or bankruptcy court, depending upon the applicable local

rules); and (i) commencing a proceeding in the United States District Court for the District of

Delaware seeking the nationwide transfer of the Pending Abuse Actions to that court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(5) and 1334(b).

7. The BSA therefore respectfully requests that the Court issue the requested

injunction. To be clear, the BSA acknowledges that the Pending Abuse Actions, as against the

BSA, are explicitly subject to the automatic stay. However, because the scope of the Pending

Abuse Actions is so vast—involving hundreds of separate cases across dozens of jurisdictions—

the BSA cannot sustain a case-by-case or claim-by-claim litigation of the scope of the automatic stay, any exceptions thereto, and any lift-stay motions that may be filed. Instead, the BSA asks that this Court stay the Pending Abuse Actions—as against the BSA and the BSA Related

Parties—to provide the best opportunity for a successful reorganization.

4

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 6 of 95

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

8. This adversary proceeding arises in and relates to the BSA’s case pending before this Court under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

9. The Court has jurisdiction to consider this adversary proceeding pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, and the Amended Standing Order of Reference from the United

States District Court for the District of Delaware, dated February 29, 2012.

10. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims against the BSA and against the BSA Related Parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. Related-to jurisdiction exists over the claims against the non-debtor BSA Related Parties because (1) the BSA and the

BSA Related Parties share an identity of interest, based upon their shared purpose and common mission and the BSA’s lead role in defending and resolving the Pending Abuse Actions, such that the claims against the BSA Related Parties are, in effect, claims against the BSA’s estate; (2) the BSA shares insurance with the BSA Related Parties in the Pending Abuse Actions; (3) the claims against the BSA Related Parties raise factual and legal questions that are substantially identical to, and inextricably intertwined with, those raised by the claims against the BSA; and

(4) continued prosecution of claims against the BSA Related Parties will have an adverse impact on the Debtors’ ability to reorganize.

11. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), and the BSA confirms its consent, pursuant to Local Rule 9013-1(f), to the entry of a final order or judgment by the Court in connection with this Motion if it is determined that the Court, absent consent of the parties, cannot enter final orders or judgments in connection herewith consistent with Article III of the

United States Constitution.

12. Venue is proper before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409.

5

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 7 of 95

THE PARTIES

13. The BSA is a congressionally chartered non-profit corporation that serves a unique and critically important mission: to train young men and women in responsible citizenship, character development, and self-reliance through participation in a wide range of outdoor activities, educational programs, and, at older age levels, career-oriented programs in partnership with community organizations.

14. To carry out its mission, a core function of the BSA is chartering the independently incorporated Local Councils and Chartered Organizations that deliver Scouting to

U.S. citizens around the world. Each of the BSA’s more than 81,000 Scouting units is organized, registered and supported by a Local Council assigned to a geographic area in which the unit is located. The BSA has chartered approximately 261 Local Councils across the United

States, which are led by paid professional adult leaders and volunteers called “Scouters.” Each

Local Council is separately incorporated under the non-profit laws of its respective state. The

Local Councils are tasked with facilitating and overseeing all Scouting activities in their assigned geographic areas. To accomplish this, the professional staff of the Local Councils work in tandem with volunteer leaders to partner with local organizations, such as faith-based organizations, clubs, civic associations, businesses, groups of individuals, and educational institutions, to serve as Chartered Organizations. The Chartered Organizations in turn sponsor, and in some cases operate, units — referred to as “packs” for Cub Scouts, “troops” for Scouts

BSA (formerly known as Boy Scouts), “crews” for units, “ships” for Sea Scouts,

“labs” for STEM Scouts, and “posts” for Exploring — that comprise the backbone of the

Scouting programs. These units are led by adult volunteers appointed by the Chartered

Organization in consultation with Local Councils and the BSA. In addition, LFL, a non-stock, non-profit corporation under the laws of the District of Columbia affiliated with the BSA, works 6

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 8 of 95

with the BSA and local community organizations to provide the Exploring program, which

focuses on educational and career-oriented experiences. Each of these entities and individuals – the BSA, Local Councils, Chartered Organizations, LFL, professional Scouters, and volunteer leaders – are essential to the success of Scouting programs in the United States.

15. Although not named parties in this adversary proceeding, as noted above, the

BSA Related Parties are listed in Exhibit B to the Complaint.

16. The Defendants in this adversary proceeding are certain plaintiffs in the Pending

Abuse Actions who have asserted claims against certain of the BSA and the BSA Related

Parties. The Defendants are listed in the caption of this Complaint and Exhibit A to this

Complaint.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Pending Abuse Actions

17. As has been widely reported, the BSA is currently a defendant (in most cases,

along with certain of the BSA Related Parties) in numerous lawsuits related to historical acts of

sexual abuse in its programs. The BSA cares deeply about all victims of child abuse and

sincerely apologizes to anyone who was harmed during their time in Scouting. The BSA also

understands that no apology can repair the damage caused by this abuse or take away the pain

that victims have endured. The BSA is steadfast in its commitment to provide equitable

compensation to victims of abuse in its Scouting programs and to continually improve its

policies to prevent abuse. The BSA will continue to actively encourage anyone who has suffered

from abuse as a Scout to come forward.

18. Many of these victims have taken legal action against the BSA and the BSA

Related Parties in the civil tort system. There are currently approximately 275 lawsuits pending in state and federal courts across the United States asserting abuse-related claims against the

7

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 9 of 95

BSA. The BSA is unable to continue to address abuse litigation in the tort system on a case-by- case basis without jeopardizing its ability to carry out its vital charitable mission. In addition to the unsustainable financial cost of continuing to engage in piecemeal litigation across the country, continuing this process will result in the risk of inconsistent judicial outcomes and inequitable treatment of victims.

19. For these reasons, beginning in late 2018, the BSA, with the assistance of its legal and financial advisors, began to explore strategic options for achieving an equitable global resolution of abuse claims, including efforts to reach an agreement with a substantial number of abuse victims that could be implemented through a prearranged chapter 11 proceeding. After it became clear that there were no meaningful prospects for a prearranged global resolution, the

BSA commenced these chapter 11 cases.

20. While the Pending Abuse Actions have without question been automatically stayed as against the BSA, certain of the actions also assert claims against the BSA Related

Parties, who are not debtors.

Impact of Pending Abuse Actions on the Debtors’ Resources

21. Continued litigation of the Pending Abuse Actions on the scale faced by the

Debtors will deplete estate assets, consume management attention, and severely harm the BSA’s ability to carry out its mission.

22. The costs of litigating hundreds of actions across the country are immense. The

BSA spent more than $150 million on settlements and legal and related professional costs from

2017 through 2019 alone. As the number of lawsuits nearing dispositive motion practice and trial increases in 2020 and beyond, there is no reason to think that litigation expenses directly connected to the Pending Abuse Actions will decrease.

8

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 10 of 95

23. In addition to financial costs, the Pending Abuse Actions have a significant impact on the BSA’s day-to-day conduct operations. The time and energy required to monitor, manage, and direct the BSA’s response to the Pending Abuse Actions is enormous. Unless the stay is extended to BSA Related Parties, the BSA necessarily will remain involved in a wide variety of litigation matters, including, for example, responses to discovery requests, the overwhelming majority of which are directed at the BSA as opposed to solely at any of the BSA

Related Parties. Moreover, the BSA will likely need to continue its roles in facilitating the retention of joint defense counsel, coordinating with insurance carriers, and assessing proposed settlements.

24. The BSA is a non-profit corporation that relies largely on member fees and donations. Unlike a for-profit corporation, the BSA cannot rely on revenues from the ordinary sales of products or services to sustain its operations during bankruptcy. Rather, there is a close correlation between the viability of the BSA as an institution and the public’s confidence in the

BSA’s ability to carry out its mission to serve youth, families and local communities through its

Scouting programs. A prolonged bankruptcy case would erode public confidence in the BSA, jeopardize its ability to operate, and ultimately deprive America’s youth of the ability to participate in Scouting. A prolonged chapter 11 case would also deplete the assets available to compensate abuse victims.

The Bankruptcy Proceeding

25. On February 18, 2020 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtors each filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy

Court for the District of Delaware.

9

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 11 of 95

26. The Debtors have commenced the chapter 11 cases to achieve the dual objectives

of (a) equitably compensating victims of abuse in Scouting and (b) ensuring that the BSA

emerges from bankruptcy with the capability to continue carrying out its vital charitable mission.

27. The Debtors seek to use tools specifically provided by the Bankruptcy Code and

related statutes to provide a pause in the Pending Abuse Actions and seek a more equitable and

efficient procedural path forward. As discussed in paragraph 5 above, in addition to the

injunctive relief sought in this Complaint, the Debtors are concurrently taking several immediate

steps and seeking related forms of relief in furtherance of their objective to achieve a speedy and

equitable resolution of their chapter 11 cases.

CLAIM FOR RELIEF

COUNT ONE

(Extension of the Automatic Stay to Enjoin Actions Against BSA Related Parties)

28. The BSA repeats and re-alleges the allegations contained in the preceding

paragraphs of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.

29. The BSA seeks to extend the automatic stay to enjoin the Pending Abuse Actions

against the BSA Related Parties, pursuant to sections 105(a) and 362 of the Bankruptcy Code,

for a period of 180 days from the issuance of the injunction.

30. Sections 362 and 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code empower this Court to extend

the stay to enjoin the prosecution of claims against the non-debtor BSA Related Parties.

31. Section 362 automatically stays, among other things, (1) “the commencement or continuation . . . of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this

10

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 12 of 95

title,” 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1); and (2) “any act to obtain possession of property of the estate or of property from the estate or to exercise control over property of the estate,” 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3).

32. Section 105(a) provides that this Court “may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title.” 11 U.S.C. §

105(a).

33. As set forth above, this Court has the jurisdiction and authority to enjoin the claims against the non-debtor BSA Related Parties pursuant to sections 362 and 105(a) because the actions will have a direct and substantial impact on the Debtors’ estates.

34. It is likely that there will be a successful reorganization, and a stay of the claims against the BSA Related Parties will further the likelihood of this success. Although the Debtors have only just commenced their bankruptcy cases, they have taken a number of significant and crucial steps to ensure a successful reorganization. For example, the Debtors are concurrently filing a proposed plan of reorganization and a disclosure statement, signaling a clear path forward towards the successful emergence from these chapter 11 proceedings. The Debtors are also pursuing a number of avenues to pause, consolidate, and mediate the Pending Abuse

Actions to bring all stakeholders and parties in interest together in one centralized forum to achieve a consensual resolution to their chapter 11 cases.

35. Absent a stay of the claims against the BSA Related Parties, there would be irreparable harm to the BSA’s estates and prospect for reorganization.

36. Because the BSA Related Parties are either additional or named insureds on certain of the BSA primary, umbrella, and excess insurance coverage and thus “share” insurance coverage, any judgment or liability resulting from the continuation of the Pending Abuse Actions

11

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 13 of 95

against the BSA Related Parties threatens to deplete estate assets that are essential to the BSA’s

reorganization and the equitable treatment of all abuse victims.

37. The claims against the non-debtor BSA Related Parties are based on conduct substantially related to, and inextricably intertwined with, that alleged to have been engaged in by the BSA, such that the BSA faces substantial risks of collateral estoppel, record taint, and evidentiary prejudice unless the Pending Abuse Actions are stayed.

38. Continuation of the Pending Abuse Actions will divert critical resources away from the BSA’s reorganization efforts. Irrespective of the risks of collateral estoppel or the protection of the automatic stay, the BSA would be required to actively participate in the

Pending Abuse Actions due to their lead role in the defense of each of the Pending Abuse

Actions, as well as the fact that the BSA is in possession of much of the discovery materials requested and produced therein.

39. The balance of harms in this case strongly favors the issuance of preliminary injunctive relief. As described above, absent an injunction of the Pending Abuse Actions, the

BSA faces distinct, imminent, and irreparable harm that would immediately cast serious doubt on its ability to successfully reorganize. Furthermore, any prejudice involved in asking victims to seek relief in a managed chapter 11 process rather than in the civil tort system can be mitigated—if not offset—by the speedy development of a plan that provides a mechanism to equitably compensate all victims.

40. The BSA seeks to ensure that victims of abuse are equitably compensated. As outlined above, it has taken concrete steps toward this outcome: it has proposed a reasonable plan of reorganization and requested the appointment of a judicial mediator to facilitate the consensual resolution of the chapter 11 cases. However, the entire process would be jeopardized

12

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 14 of 95

if the hundreds of Pending Abuse Actions are allowed to proceed in various state and federal courts across the country while the BSA attempts to seek a global resolution in these chapter 11 cases.

41. Finally, staying the claims against BSA Related Parties is in the public interest.

In any bankruptcy case, there is strong public policy in favor of allowing a debtor to reorganize and resolve its liabilities through a centralized and rational restructuring, as well as a public interest in achieving such a reorganization through the consensual process the Debtors propose to implement in these cases. The public interest in a successful reorganization is particularly acute in this case. The BSA is a non-profit, federally chartered, charitable entity that has a vibrant, century-old history of serving youth, families, and local communities. The BSA is an important

American cultural institution that exists to serve the public interest through the Scouting program. Absent a preliminary injunction over the Pending Abuse Actions, the BSA’s ability to reorganize, and therefore its ability to continue serving the public, will be cast into serious doubt.

As such, the public interest is undoubtedly best served by granting the requested relief and extending the stay to enjoin prosecution of the Pending Abuse Actions.

42. An injunction staying claims against the BSA Related Parties for a period of 180 days from the issuance of an order extending the stay is therefore appropriate.

43. No prior application for the relief requested herein has been made to this Court or any other court.

13

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 15 of 95

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court enter judgment in their favor and request relief as follows:

(a) extend the stay to enjoin the Defendants in this adversary proceeding from

commencement or continuation of the Pending Abuse Actions against the BSA and the

BSA Related Parties, if not otherwise subject to the automatic stay imposed by section

362 of the Bankruptcy Code, for a period of 180 days; and

(b) all such other relief as the Court finds just and equitable.

14

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 16 of 95

Dated: February 18, 2020 MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP Wilmington, Delaware /s/ Derek C. Abbott Derek C. Abbott (No. 3376) Andrew R. Remming (No. 5120) Joseph C. Barsalona II (No. 6102) Paige N. Topper (No. 6470) Eric Moats (No. 6441) 1201 North Market Street, 16th Floor P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1347 Telephone: (302) 658-9200 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

– and –

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP James F. Conlan (pro hac vice pending) Thomas A. Labuda (pro hac vice pending) Michael C. Andolina (pro hac vice pending) William A. Evanoff Matthew E. Linder (pro hac vice pending) One South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Telephone: (312) 853-7000 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

– and –

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Jessica C. K. Boelter (pro hac vice pending) 787 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 839-5300 Email: [email protected]

PROPOSED COUNSEL TO THE DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION

15 Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 17 of 95

VERIFICATION

The undersigned, Brian Whittman, herein states that he is authorized to make this verification on behalf of the BSA, he has read the complaint and is familiar with its contents, and the matters stated herein are true to the best of his knowledge, information and/or belief.

Executed on February 18, 2020

Brian Whittman

16 Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 18 of 95

EXHIBIT A

Pending Abuse Actions

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 19 of 95

Exhibit A Pending Abuse Actions

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 1 [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Boy Scouts of America, and 60CV-18-3729 Circuit Court of Incorporated of the Boy Quapaw Area Council Incorporated of the Pulaski County, Scouts of America Boy Scouts of America Arkansas, Second Division 2 Quapaw Area Council [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Boy Scouts of America, and 72CV-19-3209 Circuit Court of Incorporated of the Boy Quapaw Area Council Incorporated of the Washington Scouts of America Boy Scouts of America County, Arkansas Division 3 Grand Canyon Council, Inc.; [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF CV2019-015045 State of Arizona Troop #7354; Jeffrey AMERICA, a domestic corporation, Maricopa County Leonard; Kaylene Kendall GRAND CANYON COUNCIL, INC., a Superior Court and Christopher Kendall, a domestic corporation, TROOP #7354, married couple on behalf of unknown entity JEFFERY LEONARD, an their minor son Xavier individual, KAYLENE KENDALL and Kendall CHRISTOPHER KENDALL, a married couple on behalf of their minor son XAVIER KENDALL 4 Greater Los Angeles Area John Doe 1 JOHN DOE 1, an individual v. BOY 19STCV08531 Superior Court of Council; Does 1 through 100 SCOUTS OF AMERICA; BOY SCOUTS the State of OF AMERICA GREATER LOS California, County ANGELES AREA COUNCIL, and DOES of Los Angeles - 1 through 100 Central District 5 DOE DEFENDANT 1; DOE [Redacted] [Redacted] v. DOE DEFENDANT 1; 30-2020-01122410- Superior Court of DEFENDANT 2; DOES 3 DOE DEFENDANT 2; DOES 3 CU-PO-CJC the State of THROUGH 10 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE California, County of Orange 6 DOE DEFENDANT 1; DOE [Redacted] [Redacted] v. DOE DEFENDANT 1; 37-2020-00000007- Superior Court of DEFENDANT 2; DOES 3 DOE DEFENDANT 2; DOES 3 CU-PO-CTL the State of THROUGH 10 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE California, County Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 20 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency of San Diego, Central District 7 California Inland Empire John Doe; [Redacted]. JOHN DOE, a minor, an individually and CIV DS 1937879 Superior Court of Council; Does 1 through 100 by his Guardian Ad Litem, [Redacted] v. the State of BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; BOY California, County SCOUTS OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA of San Bernardino INLAND EMPIRE COUNCIL, and DOES 1 through 100 8 Silicon Valley Monterey Bay [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Boy Scouts of America; CU-17-00186 Superior Court of Council, Inc.; Learning for Silicon Valley Monterey Bay Council; California for the Life, Inc.; Does 7-100 Learning for Life, Inc.; Joseph Alvarado; County of San and Does 7-100 Benito 9 Town of Trumbull; Learning Jane Doe JANE DOE v. TOWN OF TRUMBULL; FBT-CV-19- Superior Court J.D. for Life, Inc.; William LEARNING FOR LIFE INC.; BOY 5039311-S of Fairfield at Ruscoe; Thomas Kiely; SCOUTS OF AMERICA Bridgeport Timothy Fedor CORPORATION; WILLIAM RUSCOE; THOMAS KIELY; TIMOTHY FEDOR 10 Fairfield County Council of John Doe #1; John Doe JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN FST-CV18- Superior Court J.D. Boy Scouts of America, Inc.; #2; John Doe #3; John DOE #3; JOHN DOE #4 v. BOY 5019749-S of Connecticut Yankee Doe #4 SCOUTS OF AMERICA Stamford/Norwalk Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of CORPORATION; FAIRFIELD COUNTY at Stamford America COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC.; CONNECTICUT YANKEE COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 11 Fairfield County Council of [Redacted] [Redacted] v. FAIRFIELD COUNTY FST-CV-18- Superior Court J.D. Boy Scouts of America, Inc.; COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF 6038524-S of Stamford at Connecticut Yankee AMERICA, INC., CONNECTICUT Stamford Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of YANKEE COUNCIL, INC., BOY America SCOUTS OF AMERICA and BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CORPORATION Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 21 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 12 Connecticut Rivers Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. CONNECTICUT RIVERS HHD-CV19- Superior Court J.D. Inc., Boy Scouts of America COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF 6110062-S of Hartford at AMERICA, and BOY SCOUTS OF Hartford AMERICA CORPORATION 13 Connecticut Rivers Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. CONNECTICUT RIVERS HHD-CV19- Superior Court J.D. Inc., Boy Scouts of America COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF 6110064-S of Hartford at AMERICA, and BOY SCOUTS OF Hartford AMERICA CORPORATION 14 Darwyn Azzinaro [Redacted] [Redacted] v. DARWYN AZZINARO and SC 20309 Supreme Court BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CORP. State of Connecticut 15 , Inc., [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF 14-CA-272-O Circuit Court of the Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, a corporation authorized to do Ninth Judicial , business in Florida, the NORTH Circuit in and for Inc., Boy Scouts of America FLORIDA COUNCIL, INC., BOY Orange County, SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a corporation Florida authorized to do business in Florida, and the CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a corporation authorized to do business in Florida 16 North Florida Council, Inc., [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF 2016-CA-000167 Circuit Court of the Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, a corporation authorized to do Fifth Judicial Silver Springs Shores business in Florida, the NORTH Circuit in and for Presbyterian Church, Inc. FLORIDA COUNCIL, INC., BOY Marion County, SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a corporation Florida authorized to do business in Florida, and SILVER SPRINGS SHORES PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, INC, a corporation authorized to do business in Florida 17 Stephen Zanetti; Linda [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF CACE-18-026919 Circuit Court of the Jensen; Aaron Moore AMERICA, a foreign non-profit (Div. 25) Seventeenth corporation, MARK KERN, individually, Judicial Circuit in Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 22 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency STEPHEN ZANETTI, individually, and for Broward LINDA JENSEN, individually and County, Florida AARON MOORE individually 18 Coastal Georgia Council, John Doe JOHN DOE, a pseudonym v. BOY STCV1601734 In the State Court Inc. (f/k/a) Coastal Empire SCOUTS OF AMERICA (CORP), of Chatham Council, Inc.; City of COASTAL GEORGIA COUNCIL, INC. County, State of Bloomingdale f/k/a COASTAL EMPIRE COUNCIL, Georgia, Civil INC., and CITY OF BLOOMINGALE Division 19 Northeast Georgia Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF SU18CV0721 In the Superior Inc.; Green Acres Baptist AMERICA, INC.; NORTHEAST Court of Athens- Church; First Baptist Church GEORGIA COUNCIL, INC., GREEN Clarke County, of Athens; Betty Boland, as ACRES BAPTIST CHURCH; FIRST State of Georgia the Administrator of the BAPTIST CHURCH OF ATHENS and Estate of Ernest Boland BETTY BOLAND, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ERNEST BOLAND 20 Northeast Georgia Council, Dennis Doe DENNIS DOE, individually and on behalf SU18CV0722 In the Superior Inc.; Green Acres Baptist of the General Public of the State of Court of Athens- Church; Beech Haven Georgia v. BOY SCOUTS OF Clarke County, Baptist Church; First Baptist AMERICA, INC.; NORTHEAST State of Georgia Church of Athens; Betty GEORGIA COUNCIL, INC., GREEN Boland, as the Administrator ACRES BAPTIST CHURCH; BEECH of the Estate of Ernest HAVEN BAPTIST CHURCH; FIRST Boland BAPTIST CHURCH OF ATHENS and BETTY BOLAND, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ERNEST BOLAND 21 Northeast Georgia Council, William Doe WILLIAM DOE, individually and on SU18CV0723 In the Superior Inc.; Green Acres Baptist behalf of the General Public of the State of Court of Athens- Church; Beech Haven Georgia v. BOY SCOUTS OF Clarke County, Baptist Church; First Baptist AMERICA, INC.; NORTHEAST State of Georgia Church of Athens; Betty GEORGIA COUNCIL, INC., GREEN Boland, as the Administrator ACRES BAPTIST CHURCH; BEECH HAVEN BAPTIST CHURCH; FIRST Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 23 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency of the Estate of Ernest BAPTIST CHURCH OF ATHENS and Boland BETTY BOLAND, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ERNEST BOLAND 22 Northeast Georgia Council, Timothy Doe TIMOTHY DOE, individually and on SU18CV0724 In the Superior Inc.; Green Acres Baptist behalf of the General Public of the State of Court of Athens- Church; Beech Haven Georgia v. BOY SCOUTS OF Clarke County, Baptist Church; First Baptist AMERICA, INC.; NORTHEAST State of Georgia Church of Athens; Betty GEORGIA COUNCIL, INC., GREEN Boland, as the Administrator ACRES BAPTIST CHURCH; BEECH of the Estate of Ernest HAVEN BAPTIST CHURCH; FIRST Boland BAPTIST CHURCH OF ATHENS and BETTY BOLAND, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ERNEST BOLAND 23 Northeast Georgia Council, John Doe JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of SU18CV0725 In the Superior Inc.; Green Acres Baptist the General Public of the State of Georgia Court of Athens- Church; Beech Haven v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC.; Clarke County, Baptist Church; First Baptist NORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL, State of Georgia Church of Athens; Betty INC., GREEN ACRES BAPTIST Boland, as the Administrator CHURCH; BEECH HAVEN BAPTIST of the Estate of Ernest CHURCH; FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH Boland OF ATHENS and BETTY BOLAND, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ERNEST BOLAND 24 Northeast Georgia Council, Robert Doe ROBERT DOE, individually and on SU19CV0378 In the Superior Inc.; Green Acres Baptist behalf of the General Public of the State of Court of Athens- Church; Beech Haven Georgia v. BOY SCOUTS OF Clarke County, Baptist Church; First Baptist AMERICA, INC.; NORTHEAST State of Georgia Church of Athens; Betty GEORGIA COUNCIL, INC., GREEN Boland, as the Administrator ACRES BAPTIST CHURCH; BEECH of the Estate of Ernest HAVEN BAPTIST CHURCH; FIRST Boland; R. Fleming Weaver, BAPTIST CHURCH OF ATHENS; Jr BETTY BOLAND, AS THE Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 24 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ERNEST BOLAND, and R. FLEMING WEAVER, JR. 25 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF CV0009-20 In the Superior Aloha Counsel Chamorro AMERICA, A CONGRESSIONALLY Court of Guam District; Capuchin CHARTERED CORPORATION, Franciscans; Capuchin AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN Franciscans Province of St. GUAM; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Mary; Capuchin Franciscans ALOHA COUNSEL CHAMORRO Custody of Star of the Sea; DISTRICT; CAPUCHIN Doe Entities 1-5; And Doe- FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN Individuals 6-47, Inclusive FRANCISCANS PROVINCE OF ST. MARY; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; AND DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-47, INCLUSIVE 26 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF CV0873-19 In the Superior Aloha Council Chamorro AMERICA; BOY SCOUTS OF Court of Guam District; The School Sisters AMERICA, ALOHA COUNCIL of Notre Dame, Milwaukee CHAMORRO DISTRICT; THE Province, Inc.; School SCHOOL SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME, Sisters of Notre Dame MILWAUKEE PROVINCE, INC.; Central Pacific Province, SCHOOL SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME Inc.; School Sisters of Notre CENTRAL PACIFIC PROVINCE, INC.; Dame, Region of Guam; SCHOOL SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME, John Does 1-20 REGION OF GUAM; and JOHN DOES 1-20 27 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF CV0958-19 In the Superior Aloha Council Chamorro AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Court of Guam District; Capuchin corporation, authorized to do business in Franciscans; Capuchin Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Franciscans Province of St. ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Mary; Capuchin Franciscans DISTRICT; CAPUCHIN Custody of Star of the Sea; FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 25 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- FRANCISCANS PROVINCE OF ST. Individuals 6-47, Inclusive MARY; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-47, inclusive 28 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF CV1004-19 In the Superior Aloha Council Chamorro AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Court of Guam District; Capuchin corporation, authorized to do business in Franciscans; Capuchin Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Franciscans Province of St. ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Mary; Capuchin Franciscans DISTRICT; CAPUCHIN Custody of Star of the Sea; FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- FRANCISCANS PROVINCE OF ST. Individuals 6-47, Inclusive MARY; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS CUSTODY OF STAY OF THE SEA; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-47, inclusive 29 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. CAPUCHIN CV1139-19 In the Superior Aloha Council Chamorro FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN Court of Guam District; Capuchin FRANCISCANS, PROVINCE OF ST. Franciscans; Capuchin MARY; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Franciscans, Province of St. congressionally chartered corporation Mary; Doe-Entities 1-5; and authorized to do business in Guam; BOY Doe-Individuals 6-10, SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALOHA Inclusive COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; DOE-ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-10, inclusive 30 Boy Scouts of America, John Doe No. 120 JOHN DROE NO. 120 v. BOY SCOUTS 19-1-1467-09 Circuit Court of the Aloha Council; Gary L. OF AMERICA; BOY SCOUTS OF GWBC First Circuit, State Strain; Jane Does 1-10; Doe AMERICA, ALOHA COUNCIL; GARY of Hawaii Corporations 1-10; Doe L. STRAIN; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE Partnerships 1-10; Doe Non- CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE Profit Entities 1-10; and Doe PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE NON- Governmental Entities 1-10 Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 26 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency PROFIT ENTITIES 1-10; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10 31 Hawkeye Area Council, Boy John Doe JOHN DOE v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF LACV091453 Iowa District Court Scouts of America AMERICA, a congressionally chartered for Linn County corporation, authorized to do business in Iowa and HAWKEYE AREA COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Iowa corporation 32 Chicago Area Council, Inc., [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 2019L009552 Circuit Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Cook County, Pathway to Adventure corporation, authorized to do business in Illinois County Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of Illinois, CHICAGO AREA COUNCIL, Department, Law America INC. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Division CHICAGO AREA COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC., and PATHWAY TO ADVENTURE COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 33 , [Redacted] [Redacted] v. TIMOTHY FLEMING 16-CI-001517 Jefferson Circuit Inc., Boy Scouts of America; AND THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Court Division Ten Audubon Baptist Church; AND AUDUBON BAPTIST CHURCH Timothy Fleming AND LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 34 Robert Bulens [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 19-1995 Commonwealth of AMERICA, CORP.; and ROBERT Massachusetts, BULENS Middlesex Superior Court 35 Gamehaven Council, Inc., Doe 386 Doe 386 v. The Boy Scouts of America, 55-CV-19-4378 Third Judicial Boy Scouts of America; St. Gamehaven Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of District Court, Pius X Catholic Church of America and St. Pius X Catholic Church County of Almsted Rochester, Minnesota of Rochester, Minnesota 36 Gamehaven Council, Inc., Doe 384 Doe 384 v. The Boy Scouts of America, 55-CV-19-4381 Third Judicial Boy Scouts of America; St. Gamehaven Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of District Court, County of Almsted Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 27 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Pius X Catholic Church of America; and St. Pius X Catholic Church Rochester, Minnesota of Rochester, Minnesota 37 Gamehaven Council, Inc., Doe 383 Doe 383 v. The Boy Scouts of America, 55-CV-19-4387 Third Judicial Boy Scouts of America; St. Gamehaven Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of District Court, Pius X Catholic Church of America; and St. Pius X Catholic Church County of Almsted Rochester, Minnesota of Rochester, Minnesota 38 Gamehaven Council, Inc., Doe 583 Doe 583 v. The Boy Scouts of America, 55-CV-19-4388 Third Judicial Boy Scouts of America; St. Gamehaven Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of District Court, Pius X Catholic Church of America; and St. Pius X Catholic Church County of Almsted Rochester, Minnesota of Rochester, Minnesota 39 Gamehaven Council, Inc., Doe 382 Doe 382 v. The Boy Scouts of America, 55-CV-19-4389 Third Judicial Boy Scouts of America; St. Gamehaven Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of District Court, Pius X Catholic Church of America and St. Pius X Catholic Church County of Almsted Rochester, Minnesota of Rochester, Minnesota 40 Gamehaven Council, Inc., Doe 385 Doe 385 v. The Boy Scouts of America, 55-CV-19-4390 Third Judicial Boy Scouts of America; St. Gamehaven Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of District Court, Pius X Catholic Church of America; and St. Pius X Catholic Church County of Almsted Rochester, Minnesota of Rochester, Minnesota 41 Gamehaven Council, Inc., Doe 555 Doe 555 v. The Boy Scouts of America, 55-CV-19-4464 Third Judicial Boy Scouts of America; St. Gamehaven Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of District Court, Pius X Catholic Church of America; and St. Pius X Catholic Church County of Almsted Rochester, Minnesota of Rochester, Minnesota 42 Greater St. Louis Area John Doe JOHN DOE by and through his Next 19SF-CC00053 Circuit Court of Council, Boy Scouts of Friend LINDA HOUSEKNECHT v. St. Francois America, Inc.; Samuel GREATER ST. LOUIS AREA County, Missouri, Christian Carleton COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF Division No. 1 AMERICA, INC., and BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, and SAMUEL CHRISTIAN CARLETON 43 St. Louis County, Missouri; Minor John Doe, by MINOR JOHN DOE by [Redacted]as next 19SL-CC01761 In the Saint Louis Steve Stenger; Chief Of [Redacted]as next friend friend v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, County Circuit Police Jon Belmar; Eric R. MISSOURI; STEVE STENGER; CHIEF Court 21st Judicial Parks OF POLICE JON BELMAR; BOY Circuit of Missouri Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 28 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency SCOUTS OF AMERICA; AND ERIC R. PARKS 44 Heat of America Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. TERRY WRIGHT and 19SR-CC00028 Circuit Court of St. Boy Scouts of America; HEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL, BOY Clair County, Terry Wright SCOUTS OF AMERICA and BOY Missouri, Division SCOUTS OF AMERICA Number: (n/a) 45 Montana Council, Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF ADV-19-0700 Montana Eighth Scouts of America AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Judicial District corporation, authorized to do business in Court, Cascade Montana; and MONTANA COUNCIL, County BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Montana non-profit corporation 46 Montana Council, Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF BDV-19-0750 Montana Eighth Scouts of America; John AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Judicial District Does I and II corporation, authorized to do business in Court, Cascade Montana; and MONTANA COUNCIL, County BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Montana non-profit corporation, and JOHN DOES I and II 47 Montana Council, Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF DDV-19-0701 Montana Eighth Scouts of America AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Judicial District corporation, authorized to do business in Court, Cascade Montana; and MONTANA COUNCIL, County BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Montana non-profit corporation 48 , John Doe AM, John Doe JOHN DOE AM, JOHN DOE DS, JOHN 218-2019-cv-00602 New Hampshire Boy Scouts of America DS, John Doe DZ, John DOE DZ, JOHN DOE DN, JOHN DOE Superior Court, Doe DN, John Doe PJ, PJ, and JOHN DOE PT v. BOY SCOUTS Rockingham and John Doe PT OF AMERICA, AND DANIEL County WEBSTER COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 49 , Inc., [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE NATIONAL BOY ATL-L-003267-19 Superior Court of Boy Scouts of America, f/k/a SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION New Jersey, Atlantic Area Council, Inc., d/b/a THE BOY SCOUTS OF Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 29 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Boy Scouts of America, AMERICA; JERSEY SHORE COUNCIL, Atlantic County a/k/a Atlantic Area Council INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Law Division No. 331; ABC Entity, its f/k/a ATLANTIC AREA COUNCIL, directors, officers, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, employees, agents, servants, a/k/a ATLANTIC AREA COUNCIL NO. representatives and/or 331; ABC ENTITY, its directors, officers, volunteers, is a fictitious employees, agents, servants, name of an entity believed to representatives and/or volunteers, is a have employed and/or fictitious name of an entity believed to supervised Angelo "Skip" have employed and/or supervised Angelo Dellomo; and John Does 1-5, "Skip" Dellomo; and JOHN DOES 1-5, individually, and in their individually, and in their capacity as a capacity as a former and/or former and/or current director, officer, current director, officer, employee, agent, servant, representative employee, agent, servant, and/or volunteer of the defendants, are representative and/or persons whose identities are unknown to volunteer of the defendants, Plaintiff are persons whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 50 Essex County Council of the [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF ESX-L-000063-20 Superior Court of Boy Scout of America; AMERICA; ESSEX COUNTY New Jersey, Essex Northern New Jersey COUNCIL OF THE BOYS SCOUTS OF County Law Council of the Boy Scouts of AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY Division America; Boy Scout Troop COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF #64; XYZ Entities 1-100 AMERICA; BOY SCOUT TROOP #64; (fictitious designations); and XYZ ENTITIES 1-100 (fictitious JOHN Does 1-200 (fictitious designations); and JOHN DOES 1-200 designations) (fictitious designations) 51 Essex County Counsel of the [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF ESX-L-001082-18 Superior Court of Boy Scouts of America; Xyz AMERICA, a Congressionally Chartered New Jersey, Essex Corporation 1-100 Corporation, ESSEX COUNTY County Law COUNSEL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF Division AMERICA and XYZ CORPORATION 1- 100 Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 30 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 52 Northern New Jersey Jack Doe JACK DOE v. BOY SCOUTS OF ESX-L-008777-19 Superior Court of Council Boy Scouts of AMERICA, NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, Essex America, Inc. ; ABC COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF County Law Corporations 1-10, and John AMERICA, INC., ABC Division Does 1-10 CORPORATIONS 1-10, AND JOHN DOES 1-10 53 The Pingry School; Thad [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE PINGRY SCHOOL, ESX-L-1607-18 Superior Court of Alton, and John Does 1-50, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, THAD New Jersey, Essex and ABC Corporations 1-50 ALTON, and JOHN DOES 1-50, and County Law ABC CORPORATIONS 1-50 Division 54 John Does 1-10 [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-000274-20 Superior Court of AMERICA; JOHN DOES 1-10 New Jersey, Middlesex County Law Division 55 Northern New Jersey [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008048-19 Superior Court of Council; John Does 1-10 AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 56 Northern New Jersey [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008051-19 Superior Court of Council; John Does 1-10 AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 57 Monmouth Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008052-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; MONMOUTH COUNCIL; New Jersey, JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 58 Jersey Shore Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008053-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; JERSEY SHORE COUNCIL; New Jersey, JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 59 Monmouth Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008054-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; MONMOUTH COUNCIL; New Jersey, JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 31 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 60 Monmouth Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008055-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; MONMOUTH COUNCIL; New Jersey, JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 61 Monmouth Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008056-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; MONMOUTH COUNCIL; New Jersey, JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 62 Northern New Jersey [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008057-19 Superior Court of Council; John Does 1-10 AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 63 Patriots’ Path Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008058-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; PATRIOTS' PATH New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 64 Northern New Jersey [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008059-19 Superior Court of Council; John Does 1-10 AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 65 Northern New Jersey [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008060-19 Superior Court of Council; John Does 1-10 AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 66 Northern New Jersey [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008061-19 Superior Court of Council; John Does 1-10 AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 67 Garden State Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008062-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; GARDEN STATE New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 32 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 68 Patriots’ Path Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008063-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; PATRIOTS' PATH New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 69 Jersey Shore Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008064-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; JERSEY SHORE COUNCIL; New Jersey, JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 70 Garden State Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008065-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; GARDEN STATE New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 71 Northern New Jersey [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008066-19 Superior Court of Council; John Does 1-10 AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 72 Monmouth Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008067-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; MONMOUTH COUNCIL; New Jersey, JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 73 Patriots Path Council [Redacted] [Redacted] v. PATRIOTS PATH MRS-L-000123-20 Superior Court of COUNCIL; BOY SCOUTS OF New Jersey, Morris AMERICA, INC. County Law Division 74 Patriots’ Path Council, Inc. [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF SSX-L-000027-20 Superior Court of Boy Scouts of America, AMERICA, a Congressionally Chartered New Jersey, Sussex District Boy Scouts Corporation, PATRIOTS' PATH Sussex County of America d/b/a Stillwater COUNCIL, INC. BOY SCOUTS OF Law Division Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, SUSSEX DISTRICT BOY and/or Group 83 Stillwater, SCOUTS OF AMERICA d/b/a Stillwater and XYZ Corporation 1-100 Boy Scouts of America and/or Group 83 Stillwater, and XYZ CORPORATION 1- 100 Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 33 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 75 Country Farm Supply; John Doe JOHN DOE v. [Redacted], COUNTRY D-101-CV-2019- First Judicial Sacred Heart – Espanola; FARM SUPPLY, BOY SCOUTS OF 02807 District Court, Monastery of Christ in the AMERICA, SACRED HEART - County of Santa Fe Desert; Richard Lucero ESPANOLA, and MONASTERY OF CHRIST IN THE DESERT 76 Great Southwest Council, John Doe JOHN DOE v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF D-202-CV-2018- Second Judicial Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, a Congressionally Chartered 08922 District, County of Corporation, and GREAT SOUTHWEST Bernalillo COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a New Mexico non-profit corporation 77 Richard L. Lucero [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Richard L. Lucero, and Boy D-202-CV-2019- Second Judicial Scouts of America 05558 District, County of Bernalillo 78 Longhouse Council, Inc., [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE NATIONAL BOY 000543/2020 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION the State of New d/b/a THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA, and LONGHOUSE New York COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 79 Hiawatha Council; The [Redacted] [Redacted] v. DONALD J. HERBERT; 003542/2019 Supreme Court of Roman Catholic Diocese of BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC.; the State of New Syracuse; Saint John the BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - York, County of Baptist Church; Donald J. HIAWATHA COUNCIL; THE ROMAN Onondaga Herbert; Does 1-100 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE; SAINT JOHN THE BAPTIST CHURCH; and DOES 1-100 80 Longhouse Council [Redacted] [Redacted] and R.E.M. v. BOY SCOUTS 007370/2019 Supreme Court of OF AMERICA and LONGHOUSE the State of New COUNCIL York, County of Onondaga 81 Boy Scout Troop 95; Our Anonymous #1, An ANONYMOUS #1, An Infant, by his 2017-50699 Supreme Court of Savior Lutheran Church; Infant, by his Parent and Parent and Natural Guardians, and his the State of New Hudson Valley Council, Inc., Natural Guardians, and Parents and Natural Guardians Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 34 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Boy Scouts of America; his Parents and Natural Individually v. MICHAEL KELSEY, York, County of Michael Kelsey; Richard Guardians Individually RICHARD ROBBINS, BOY SCOUT Dutchess Robbins TROOP 95, OUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH, HUDSON VALLEY COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, and BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. 82 Boy Scout Troop 95; Our Anonymous #2, An ANONYMOUS #2, An Infant, by his 2017-50700 Supreme Court of Savior Lutheran Church; Infant, by his Parent and Parent and Natural Guardians, and his the State of New Hudson Valley Council, Inc., Natural Guardians, and Parents and Natural Guardians York, County of Boy Scouts of America; his Parents and Natural Individually v. MICHAEL KELSEY, Dutchess Michael Kelsey; Richard Guardians Individually RICHARD ROBBINS, BOY SCOUT Robbins TROOP 95, OUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH, HUDSON VALLEY COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, and BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. 83 Five Rivers Council, Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 2019-5295 Supreme Court of Scouts of America AMERICA, and FIVE RIVERS the State of New COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Chemung 84 Five Rivers Council [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 2020-5116 Supreme Court of AMERICA and FIVE RIVERS the State of New COUNCIL York, County of Chemung 85 Five Rivers Council [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 2020-5117 Supreme Court of AMERICA and FIVE RIVERS the State of New COUNCIL York, County of Chemung 86 Boy Scouts of America,- [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 500275/2020 Supreme Court of Pack 494 AMERICA and BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New AMERICA,-Pack 494 York, County of Kings Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 35 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 87 Diocese of Brooklyn; St. [Redacted] [Redacted] v. DIOCESE OF 500293/2020 Supreme Court of Francis Xavier Church; BROOKLYN, ST. FRANCIS XAVIER the State of New Greater New York Councils, CHURCH, NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS York, County of Inc., Boy Scouts of America; OF AMERICA FOUNDATION a/k/a Kings Brooklyn Council, Boy THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Scouts of America GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA and BROOKLYN COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a New York Corporation 88 Boy Scouts of America,- [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 500432/2020 Supreme Court of Pack 494 AMERICA and BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New AMERICA,-Pack 494 York, County of Kings 89 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 50972/2020 Supreme Court of Westchester Putnam AMERICA, INC., and BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New Council, Inc. AMERICA WESTCHESTER-PUTNAM York, County of COUNCIL, INC. Westchester 90 Boy Scouts of America,- [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 517930/2019 Supreme Court of Pack 494 AMERICA and BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New AMERICA,-Pack 494 York, County of Kings 91 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 517996/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, INC., a Congressionally the State of New Brooklyn Council, Boy Chartered Corporation authorized to do York, County of Scouts of America business in New York, GREATER NEW Kings YORK COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a New York Corporation, and BROOKLYN COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a New York Corporation 92 Diocese of Brooklyn; [Redacted] [Redacted] v. DIOCESE OF 518178/2019 Supreme Court of Church of the Holy BROOKLYN, CHURCH OF THE HOLY the State of New Innocents; Greater New INNOCENTS, GREATER NEW YORK York, County of York Council of the Boy COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF Kings Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 36 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Scouts of America; Alpine AMERICA, ALPINE SCOUT CAMP, and Scout Camp; Frank Pedone FRANK PEDONE 93 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 520203/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Kings 94 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 522910/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA; NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS the State of New Greater New York Councils; OF AMERICA FOUNDATION; York, County of Queens Council, Boy Scouts SCOUTS BSA; GREATER NEW YORK Kings of America; Diocese of COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF Brooklyn; St. Benedict AMERICA; GREATER NEW YORK Joseph Labre Church; St. COUNCILS; QUEENS COUNCIL, BOY Benedict Joseph Labre SCOUTS OF AMERICA; DIOCESE OF School ; James T. Grace Jr. BROOKLYN; ST. BENEDICT JOSEPH LABRE CHURCH; ST. BENEDICT JOSEPH LABRE SCHOOL; and JAMES T. GRACE JR. 95 Greater New York Councils; [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 523726/2019 Supreme Court of Brooklyn Council; John B. AMERICA, GREATER NEW YORK the State of New Lowell COUNCILS, BROOKLYN COUNCIL York, County of and JOHN B. LOWELL Kings 96 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 525290/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA; NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS the State of New Greater New York Councils; OF AMERICA FOUNDATION; York, County of Brooklyn Council, Boy SCOUTS BSA; GREATER NEW YORK Kings Scouts of America COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; AND GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS, BROOKLYN COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 97 Boy Scouts OF America,- [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 527328/2019 Supreme Court of Pack 494 AMERICA and BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New AMERICA,-Pack 494 Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 37 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency York, County of Kings 98 Boy Scouts OF America,- [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 527330/2019 Supreme Court of Pack 494 AMERICA and BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New AMERICA,-Pack 494 York, County of Kings 99 Westchester-Putnam Council [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 62283/2019 Supreme Court of AMERICA and WESTCHESTER- the State of New PUTNAM COUNCIL York, County of Westchester 100 Suffolk County Council of [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 623589/2019 Supreme Court of the Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and SUFFOLK COUNTY the State of New COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Suffolk 101 Theodore Roosevelt Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 63377/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and THEODORE the State of New ROOSEVELT COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS York, County of OF AMERICA Westchester 102 Westchester-Putnam [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 63379/2019 Supreme Court of Council, Boy Scouts of AMERICA, and WESTCHESTER- the State of New America PUTNAM COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Westchester 103 Westchester-Putnam [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 63385/2019 Supreme Court of Council, Boy Scouts of AMERICA, and WESTCHESTER- the State of New America PUTNAM COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Westchester 104 Westchester-Putnam [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 63386/2019 Supreme Court of Council, Boy Scouts of AMERICA, and WESTCHESTER- the State of New America PUTNAM COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Westchester 105 Westchester-Putnam [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 64149/2019 Supreme Court of Council, Boy Scouts of AMERICA, and WESTCHESTER the State of New America PUTNAM COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Westchester Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 38 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 106 Westchester-Putnam [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 66932/2019 Supreme Court of Council, Boy Scouts of AMERICA, and WESTCHESTER- the State of New America PUTNAM COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Westchester 107 Bronx Council Boy Scouts Anonymous BR ANONYMOUS BR v. THE BOY 70012/2019E Supreme Court of of America, Inc.; St. Helena SCOUTS OF AMERICA, BRONX the State of New Parish COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA, INC., and ST. HELENA the Bronx PARISH 108 St. Demetrios Greek [Redacted] [Redacted] v. LAWRENCE SVRCEK, 717381/2019 Supreme Court of Orthodox Church; Greek ST. DEMETRIOS GREEK ORTHODOX the State of New Orthodox Archdiocese of CHURCH, GREEK ORTHODOX York, County of America; The Boy Scouts of ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERICA, THE Queens America Greater New York BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, and THE Councils; Lawrence Svrcek BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS 109 Greater Niagara Frontier [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 801175/2020 Supreme Court of Council of the Boy Scouts of AMERICA, GREATER NIAGARA the State of New America; Diocese of FRONTIER COUNCIL OF THE BOY York, County of Buffalo; St. Ambrose SCOUTS OF AMERICA, DIOCESE OF Erie Church BUFFALO, AND ST. AMBROSE CHURCH 110 Greater Niagara Frontier [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 810199/2019 Supreme Court of Council AMERICA and GREATER NIAGARA the State of New FRONTIER COUNCIL York, County of Erie 111 Greater Niagara Frontier [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 810485/2019 Supreme Court of Council, Boy Scouts of AMERICA, and GREATER NIAGARA the State of New America FRONTIER COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS York, County of OF AMERICA Erie 112 Greater Niagara Frontier [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 811022/2019 Supreme Court of Council, Boy Scouts of AMERICA, and GREATER NIAGARA the State of New America FRONTIER COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS York, County of OF AMERICA Erie Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 39 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 113 Greater Niagara Frontier [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 814696/2019 Supreme Court of Council AMERICA and GREATER NIAGARA the State of New FRONTIER COUNCIL York, County of Erie 114 Greater Niagara Frontier [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 814708/2019 Supreme Court of Council AMERICA and GREATER NIAGARA the State of New FRONTIER COUNCIL York, County of Erie 115 Greater Niagara Frontier [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 814709/2019 Supreme Court of Council AMERICA and GREATER NIAGARA the State of New FRONTIER COUNCIL York, County of Erie 116 Greater Niagara Frontier [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 814710/2019 Supreme Court of Council AMERICA and GREATER NIAGARA the State of New FRONTIER COUNCIL York, County of Erie 117 Greater Niagara Frontier John Doe JOHN DOE v. BOY SCOUTS OF 815068/2019 Supreme Court of Council #380 AMERICA and GREATER NIAGARA the State of New FRONTIER COUNCIL #380 York, County of Erie 118 Greater Niagara Frontier KS-Doe-1, KS-Doe-1a; KS-Doe-1; KS-Doe-1a; KS-Doe-2; KS- 815447/2019 Supreme Court of Council #380 of the Boy KS-Doe-2; KS-Doe-2a; Doe-2a; KS-Doe-3; KS-Doe-3a; KS-Doe- the State of New Scouts of America; Holy KS-Doe-3; KS-Doe-3a; 4; KS-Doe-4a; KS-Doe-5; KS-Doe-6; KS- York, County of See, State of Vatican City - KS-Doe-4; KS-Doe-4a; Doe-7; KS-Doe-7a; KS-Doe-8; KS-Doe-9; Erie The Vatican; Pope Francis - KS-Doe-5; KS-Doe-6; KS-Doe-9a; KS-Doe-10; KS-Doe-10a; The Pontiff, Bishop of KS-Doe-7; KS-Doe-7a; KS-Doe-11; KS-Doe-11a; KS-Doe-12; Rome, Supreme Leader and KS-Doe-8; KS-Doe-9; KS-Doe-12a; KS-Doe-13; KS-Doe-14; Supervisor of the Roman KS-Doe-9a; KS-Doe-10; KS-Doe-15; KS-Doe-16; KS-Doe-16a; Catholic Church, a/k/a Jorge KS-Doe-10a; KS-Doe- KS-Doe-17; KS-Doe-21; KS-Doe-21a; Mario Bergoglio; 11; KS-Doe-11a; KS- KS-Doe-22; and KS-Doe v. Holy See, Archbishop Timothy Dolan, Doe-12; KS-Doe-12a; State of Vatican City - The Vatican; Pope Archbishop of New York; KS-Doe-13; KS-Doe-14; Francis - The Pontiff, Bishop of Rome, Archbishop Christopher KS-Doe-15; KS-Doe-16; Supreme Leader and Supervisor of the Pierre, Apostolic Nuncio of KS-Doe-16a; KS-Doe- Roman Catholic Church, a/k/a Jorge Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 40 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency the Holy See for the United 17; KS-Doe-21; KS-Doe- Mario Bergoglio; Archbishop Timothy States; The Foundation of 21a; KS-Doe-22; and KS- Dolan, Archbishop of New York; the Roman Catholic Diocese Doe Archbishop Christopher Pierre, Apostolic of Buffalo N.Y., Inc; Most Nuncio of the Holy See for the United Reverend Richard J. Malone, States; The Foundation of the Roman a/k/a Bishop Richard J. Catholic Diocese of Buffalo N.Y., Inc; Malone; Most Reverend Most Reverend Richard J. Malone, a/k/a Edward U. Kmiec, a/k/a Bishop Richard J. Malone; Most Reverend Bishop Edward U. Kmiec; Edward U. Kmiec, a/k/a Bishop Edward Most Reverend Henry J. U. Kmiec; Most Reverend Henry J. Mansell, a/k/a Bishop Henry Mansell, a/k/a Bishop Henry J. Mansell; J. Mansell; St. Joseph St. Joseph Investment Fund, Inc.; George Investment Fund, Inc.; J. Eberl; Society of Jesus, USA-Northeast George J. Eberl; Society of Province a/k/a The Jesuits; Rev. Ronald Jesus, USA-Northeast Silverio; Rev. Basil Ormsby, S.J.; Rev. Province a/k/a The Jesuits; Florian Jasinski; Rev. Joseph Persich, S.J.; Rev. Ronald Silverio; Rev. Rev. David Bialakowski; Rev. Frederick Basil Ormsby, S.J.; Rev. Fingerle; Monsignor Michael Harrington; Florian Jasinski; Rev. Joseph Monsignor William Stanton; Rev. Persich, S.J.; Rev. David Theodore Podson; Rev. Nelson Kinmartin; Bialakowski; Rev. Frederick Rev. Gerald Jasinski; Rev. Ronald Sajdak; Fingerle; Monsignor Rev. Donald W. Becker; Rev. Norbert Michael Harrington; Orsolits; Rev. William White; Rev. John Monsignor William Stanton; P. Hajduk; St. Bridgets R.C. Church; All Rev. Theodore Podson; Rev. Saints R.C. Church; The Blessed Trinity Nelson Kinmartin; Rev. R.C. Church; Holy Family R.C. Church; Gerald Jasinski; Rev. Ronald St. Teresas R.C. Church; St. Josephats Sajdak; Rev. Donald W. R.C. Church; St. John Gualberts R.C. Becker; Rev. Norbert Church; St. John Vianney R.C. Church; St. Orsolits; Rev. William Pauls R.C. Church; Immaculate White; Rev. John P. Hajduk; Conception R.C. Church; Canisius High St. Bridgets R.C. Church; School of Buffalo; Calasanctius School of All Saints R.C. Church; The Buffalo; Bishop Turner High School; Blessed Trinity R.C. Church; Christ the King; Seminary; Queen of Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 41 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Holy Family R.C. Church; Peave R.C. Church; Priest-Doe(s); St. Teresas R.C. Church; St. Attorney(s) ABC and Accountant(s) XYZ; Josephats R.C. Church; St. The Fidelis Care as a Trademark for the John Gualberts R.C. Church; Centene Corporation; Catholic Health of St. John Vianney R.C. WNY and its subsidiaries; Catholic Church; St. Pauls R.C. Cemeteries of the Roman Catholic Church; Immaculate Diocese of Buffalo, Inc.; Christ the King Conception R.C. Church; Seminary Fund, Inc.; John Gruber, Canisius High School of individually; and The Boy Scouts of Buffalo; Calasanctius School America and the Greater Niagara Frontier of Buffalo; Bishop Turner Council #380 of the Boy Scouts of High School; Christ the America King; Seminary; Queen of Peave R.C. Church; Priest- Doe(s); Attorney(s) ABC and Accountant(s) XYZ; The Fidelis Care as a Trademark for the Centene Corporation; Catholic Health of WNY and its subsidiaries; Catholic Cemeteries of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Buffalo, Inc.; Christ the King Seminary Fund, Inc.; John Gruber, individually 119 Greater Niagara Frontier LG 37 Doe LG 37 DOE v. DOUGLAS NAIL, 816082/2019 Supreme Court of Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of GREATER NIAGARA FRONTIER the State of New America; Douglas Nail COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA, and BOY SCOUTS OF Erie AMERICA 120 Boy Scouts of America, PB-9 Doe PB-9 Doe v. BOY SCOUTS OF 816891/2019 Supreme Court of Iroquois Trail Council, Inc.; AMERICA, IROQUOIS TRAIL the State of New Boy Scouts of America, COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of Greater Niagara Frontier AMERICA, GREATER NIAGARA Erie Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 42 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Council, Inc.; Alleghany FRONTIER COUNCIL, INC., BOY Highlands Council, Inc. SCOUTS OF AMERICA, and ALLEGHANY HIGHLANDS COUNCIL, INC. 121 Theodore Roosevelt Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS 900001/2020 Supreme Court of Inc., Boy Scouts of America OF AMERICA FOUNDATION a/k/a the State of New f/k/a Nassau County Council THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a York, County of Boy Scouts of America, Inc. foreign not-for-profit corporation and Nassau THEODORE ROOSEVELT COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA f/k/a NASSAU COUNTY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC., a domestic not-for-profit corporation 122 N/A Anonymous ANONYMOUS v. BOY SCOUTS OF 900007/2020 Supreme Court of AMERICA the State of New York, County of Nassau 123 Theodore Roosevelt Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS 900034/2019 Supreme Court of Inc., Boy Scouts of America OF AMERICA FOUNDATION a/k/a the State of New f/k/a Nassau County Council THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; York, County of of Boy Scouts of America, THEODORE ROOSEVELT COUNCIL, Nassau Inc.; House of Hope INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA f/k/a Presbyterian Church; Does NASSAU COUNTY COUNCIL OF BOY 1-5 whose identities are SCOUTS OF AMERICA, unknown to Plaintiff INCORPORATED; HOUSE OF HOPE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH; and DOES 1-5 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 124 Theodore Roosevelt Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 900043/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and THEODORE the State of New ROOSEVELT COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS York, County of OF AMERICA Nassau 125 Theodore Roosevelt Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 900063/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and THEODORE the State of New Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 43 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency ROOSEVELT COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS York, County of OF AMERICA Nassau 126 Twin Rivers Council [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 905227-19 Supreme Court of AMERICA and TWIN RIVERS the State of New COUNCIL York, County of Albany 127 Boy Scouts of America Twin [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 905313-19 Supreme Court of Rivers Council; Vincent AMERICA (BSA), BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New Siecinski AMERICA TWIN RIVERS COUNCIL, York, County of VINCENT SIECINSKI Schenectady 128 Twin Rivers Council, Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 906641-19 Supreme Court of Scouts of America AMERICA, and TWIN RIVERS the State of New COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Albany 129 Twin Rivers Council, Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 906642-19 Supreme Court of Scouts of America AMERICA, and TWIN RIVERS the State of New COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Albany 130 Twin Rivers Council, Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 907033-19 Supreme Court of Scouts of America AMERICA, and TWIN RIVERS the State of New COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Albany 131 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS 950030/2020 Supreme Court of Inc., Boy Scouts of America; OF AMERICA FOUNDATION a/k/a the State of New Manhattan Council, Boy THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, York, County of Scouts of America; GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS, New York Archdiocese of New York; INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Our Lady of Lourdes MANHATTAN COUNCIL, BOY Catholic School SCOUTS OF AMERICA, ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK and OUR LADY OF LOURDES CATHOLIC SCHOOL 132 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950039/2020 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 44 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 133 Greater New York Council John Doe JOHN DOE v. GREATER NEW YORK 950078/2019 Supreme Court of of the Boy Scouts of COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New America; Ten Miles River AMERICA, TEN MILES RIVER SCOUT York, County of Scout Camp; Camp CAMP, CAMP AQUEHONGA and New York Aquehonga BRUCE DeSANDRE 134 Greater New York Council John Doe JOHN DOE v. GREATER NEW YORK 950088/2019 Supreme Court of of the Boy Scouts of COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New America; Big Cross AMERICA and BIG CROSS York, County of Elementary School ELEMENTARY SCHOOL New York 135 Greater New York Council John Doe JOHN DOE v. GREATER NEW YORK 950089/2019 Supreme Court of of the Boy Scouts of COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF the State of New America; Ten Mile River AMERICA, TEN MILE RIVER SCOUT York, County of Scout Camp; Gary CAMP and GARY ACKERMAN New York Ackerman 136 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS 950094/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America d/b/a OF AMERICA FOUNDATION a/k/a the State of New Queens Council; Greater THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; York, County of New York Councils, Boy GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS, New York Scouts of America; St. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA d/b/a Nicholas of Tolentine; QUEENS COUNCIL, GREATER NEW University Heights YORK COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF Presbyterian Church; Does AMERICA; ST. NICHOLAS OF 1-5 whose identities are TOLENTINE; UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS unknown to Plaintiff PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH; and DOES 1-5 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 137 Greater New York Councils, ARK85 Doe ARK85 Doe v. NATIONAL BOY 950095/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America a/b/a SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION the State of New Staten Island Council Boy a/k/a THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of Scouts of America, Inc.; St. AMERICA; GREATER NEW YORK New York Teresa Parish a/k/a Church COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF of St. Teresa of the Infant AMERICA d/b/a STATEN ISLAND Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 45 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Jesus; Does 1-5 whose COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF identities are unknown to AMERICA, INC.; ST. TERESA PARISH Plaintiff a/k/a CHURCH OF ST. TERESA OF THE INFANT JESUS; and DOES 1-5 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 138 Greater New York Councils, ARK99 Doe ARK99 DOE v. NATIONAL BOY 950096/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; St. SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION the State of New Pius V; Does 1-5 whose a/k/a THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of identities are unknown to AMERICA; GREATER NEW YORK New York Plaintiff COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; ST. PIUS V; and DOES 1-5 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 139 Greater New York Councils, ARK100 DOE ARK100 DOE v. NATIONAL BOY 950097/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION the State of New a/b/a/ Manhattan Council; a/k/a THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of Greater New York Councils, AMERICA; GREATER NEW YORK New York Boy Scouts of America; COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF Does 1-5 whose identities AMERICA d/b/a MANHATTAN are unknown to Plaintiff COUNCIL, GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; and DOES 1-5 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 140 Greater New York Councils, ARK102 Doe ARK102 DOE v. NATIONAL BOY 950098/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America a/b/a SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION the State of New Manhattan Council; Greater a/k/a THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of New York Councils, Boy AMERICA; GREATER NEW YORK New York Scouts of America; Big COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF Apple District; Greater New AMERICA d/b/a MANHATTAN York Councils, Boy Scouts COUNCIL, GREATER NEW YORK of America; Does 1-5 whose COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF identities are unknown to AMERICA; BIG APPLE DISTRICT, Plaintiff GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; and Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 46 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency DOES 1-5 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 141 Greater New York Councils, ARK103 Doe ARK103 DOE v. NATIONAL BOY 950099/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America a/b/a SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION the State of New Brooklyn Council, Boy a/k/a THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of Scouts of America; Holy AMERICA; GREATER NEW YORK New York Family Church; Does 1-5 COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF whose identities are AMERICA d/b/a BROOKLYN unknown to Plaintiff COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; HOLY FAMILY CHURCH; and DOES 1-5 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 142 Greater New York Councils, ARK104 Doe ARK104 DOE v. NATIONAL BOY 950100/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America a/k/a SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION the State of New Greater New York City a/k/a THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of Councils; Bronx Council AMERICA; GREATER NEW YORK New York a/k/a and d/b/a Bronx COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF Council, Boy Scouts of AMERICA a/k/a GREATER NEW America; Ten Mile River YORK CITY COUNCILS, BRONX Scout Camps, Boy Scouts of COUNCIL a/k/a and d/b/a BRONX America a/k/a Ten Mile COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF River Scout Camps; Alpine AMERICA; TEN MILE RIVER SCOUT Scout Camp a/k/a Alpine CAMPS, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Scout Camp, Boy Scouts of a/k/a TEN MILE RIVER SCOUT America; Patrick A. CAMPS; ALPINE SCOUT CAMP a/k/a Mancuso; Does 1-5 whose ALPINE SCOUT CAMP, BOY SCOUTS identities are unknown to OF AMERICA; PATRICK A. Plaintiff MANCUSO; and DOES 1-5 whose identities are unknown to Plaintiff 143 Greater New York Councils [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950102/2019 Supreme Court of AMERICA and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS York, County of New York Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 47 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 144 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950103/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, GREATER NEW YORK the State of New Manhattan Council, Boy COUNCILS, BOY SOUTS OF York, County of Scouts of America AMERICA, and MANHATTAN New York COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 145 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950110/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 146 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950112/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 147 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950115/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 148 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950116/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 149 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950117/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 150 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950118/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 151 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950125/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 48 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 152 N/A [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950151/2019 Supreme Court of AMERICA the State of New York, County of New York 153 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950162/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 154 Roman Catholic [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 950176/2019 Supreme Court of Archdiocese of New York; ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK, the State of New Archdiocese of New York; ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK, York, County of Regis High School; USA REGIS HIGH SCHOOL, USA New York Northeast Province of the NORTHEAST PROVINCE OF THE Society of Jesus; The Boy SOCIETY OF JESUS, THE BOY Scouts of America Greater SCOUTS OF AMERICA, THE BOY New York Councils; SCOUTS OF AMERICA GREATER Brooklyn Council; Ten Mile NEW YORK COUNCILS, BROOKLYN River Scout Camp COUNCIL AND TEN MILE RIVER SCOUT CAMP 155 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950179/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA New York 156 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS 950235/2019 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; Ten OF AMERICA FOUNDATION a/k/a the State of New Mile River Scout Camps THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; York, County of a/k/a Ten Mile River Scout GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS, New York Camps, Boy Scouts of BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; TEN America; Does 1-5 whose MILE RIVER SCOUT CAMPS a/k/a TEN identifies are unknown to MILE RIVER SCOUT CAMPS, BOY Plaintiff SCOUTS OF AMERICA; and DOES 1-5 whose identifies are unknown to Plaintiff 157 The Diocese of Rochester [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE DIOCESE OF E2019008550 Supreme Court of (a/k/a “Roman Catholic ROCHESTER (a/k/a "Roman Catholic the State of New Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 49 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Diocese of Rochester”); Diocese of Rochester"), a religious York, County of Roman Catholic Parish of St. corporation; ROMAN CATHOLIC Monroe Frances Xavier Cabrini, PARISH OF ST. FRANCES XAVIER Rochester NY (formerly CABRINI, ROCHESTER NY (formerly “Church of the Annunciation "Church of the Annunciation of Rochester, of Rochester, New York”); New York"), a religious corporation, THE The Seneca Waterways NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of AMERICA FOUNDATION d/b/a THE America BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; and THE , INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 158 Seneca Waterways Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF E2019009226 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and SENECA the State of New WATERWAYS COUNCIL, BOY York, County of SCOUTS OF AMERICA Monroe 159 Seneca Waterways Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF E2019009232 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and SENECA the State of New WATERWAYS COUNCIL, BOY York, County of SCOUTS OF AMERICA Monroe 160 Longhouse Council, Inc., [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF E2020-0067 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA; LONGHOUSE COUNCIL, the State of New Weedsport Central School INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; York, County of District; Weedsport Central WEEDSPORT CENTRAL SCHOOL Cayuga School District Board of DISTRICT; WEEDSPORT CENTRAL Education; Does 1-5 whose SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF identifies are unknown to EDUCATION; and DOES 1-5 whose Plaintiff identifies are unknown to Plaintiff 161 Twin Rivers Council, Inc., [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF EF2019-264964 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA; TWIN RIVERS COUNCIL, the State of New Governor Clinton Council, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; and York, County of Inc., Boy Scouts of America GOVERNOR CLINTON COUNCIL, Rensselaer INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 162 Twin Rivers Council, Inc., John Doe JOHN DOE v. BOY SCOUTS OF EF2020-67684 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, TWIN RIVERS COUNCIL, the State of New Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 50 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Glens Falls City School INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, and York, County of District GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL Warren DISTRICT 163 [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF EFCA2019-002218 Supreme Court of AMERICA and LEATHERSTOCKING the State of New COUNCIL York, County of Oneida 164 Baden-Powell Council, Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF EFCA2019002577 Supreme Court of Scouts of America AMERICA, and BADEN-POWELL the State of New COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Broome 165 Leatherstocking Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF EFCA2019-003382 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, and LEATHERSTOCKING the State of New COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of AMERICA Oneida 166 The Roman Catholic [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC EFCA2019003404 Supreme Court of Diocese of Syracuse, NY; St. DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE, NY; ST. the State of New Catherine’s Roman Catholic CATHERINE'S ROMAN CATHOLIC York, County of Church; St. Catherine’s CHURCH; ST. CATHERINE'S ROMAN Broome Roman Catholic Church CATHOLIC CHURCH SCHOOL; ST. School; St. Francis of Assisi FRANCIS OF ASSISI ROMAN Roman Catholic Church; CATHOLIC CHURCH; Susquenango Council, Boy SUSQUENANGO COUNCIL, BOY Scouts of America, Inc.; SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC; and Baden-Powell Council, Inc., BADEN-POWELL COUNCIL, INC., Boy Scouts of America BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 167 Susquenango Council, Boy SHC-MG-4 Doe SHC-MG-4 DOE v. DAVID A. DECLUE, EFCA2020000013 Supreme Court of Scouts of America, Inc.; a/k/a DAVID DECLUE; the State of New Baden-Powell Council, Inc., SUSQUENANGO COUNCIL, BOY York, County of Boy Scouts of America; SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC.; BADEN- Broome David A. Declue, a/k/a POWELL COUNCIL, INC., BOY David Declue SCOUTS OF AMERICA; AND BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a/k/a NATIONAL BOY SCOUTS OF Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 51 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency AMERICA FOUNDATION, a/k/a BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, CORP. 168 Allegheny Highlands [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Allegheny Highlands EK12019001390 Supreme Court of Council, Inc.; Donald C. Council, Inc., Donald C. Shriver, and Boy the State of New Shriver Scouts of America, Inc. York, County of Chautauqua 169 Leatherstocking Council of [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF Supreme Court of the Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, LEATHERSTOCKING the State of New Mohawk District of the COUNCIL OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of Northern New York Annual AMERICA, and MOHAWK DISTRICT Oneida Conference of the Methodist OF THE NORTHERN NEW YORK Episcopal Church of New ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE York METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF NEW YORK 170 Oregon Trail Council, Inc., [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF 16CV02494 In the Court of Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Appeals of the Learning for Life corporation; OREGON TRAIL State of Oregon COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Oregon non-profit corporation; and LEARNING FOR LIFE, a District of Columbia non-profit corporation 171 Cascade Pacific Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF 16CV07124 In the Circuit Court Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, a congressionally chartered of the State of corporation authorized to do business in Oregon, Oregon; and CASCADE PACIFIC Multnomah County COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Oregon nonprofit corporation 172 Cascade Pacific Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF 16CV07125 In the Court of Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Appeals of the corporation authorized to do business in State of Oregon Oregon; and CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 52 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency AMERICA, an Oregon nonprofit corporation 173 Cascade Pacific Council, Mark Doe MARK DOE, an individual proceeding 16CV37755 In the Circuit Court Boy Scouts of America under a fictitious name v. THE BOY of the State of SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Oregon, congressionally chartered corporation Multnomah County authorized to do business in Oregon; and CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Oregon nonprofit corporation 174 Cascade Pacific Council, Julie Doe, an adult JULIE DOE, an adult proceeding under a 18CV03080 In the Circuit Court Boy Scouts of America proceeding under a pseudonym, as Guardian Ad Litem for of the State of pseudonym, as Guardian TRAVIS DOE, a minor proceeding under Oregon, Ad Litem for Travis Doe, a pseudonym v. BOY SCOUTS OF Multnomah County a minor proceeding under AMERICA, a Congressionally Chartered a pseudonym Corporation, authorized to do business in Oregon; and CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation 175 Cascade Pacific Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. THE BOY SCOUTS OF 18CV10468 In the Circuit Court Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, a congressionally chartered of the State of corporation authorized to do business in Oregon, Oregon; and CASCADE PACIFIC Multnomah County COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Oregon nonprofit corporation 176 Cascade Pacific Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 18CV19898 In the Circuit Court Boy Scouts of America AMERICA, a Congressionally Chartered of the State of Corporation, authorized to do business in Oregon, Oregon; and CASCADE PACIFIC Multnomah County COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 53 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 177 Cascade Pacific Council, Andrew Doe, an adult ANDREW DOE, an adult proceeding 18CV22349 In the Circuit Court Boy Scouts of America proceeding under a under a pseudonym, as Guardian Ad Litem of the State of pseudonym, as Guardian for BRIAN DOE and CARL DOE, minors Oregon, Ad Litem for Brian Doe proceeding under pseudonyms v. BOY Multnomah County and Carl Doe, minors SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a proceeding under Congressionally Chartered Corporation, pseudonyms authorized to do business in Oregon; and CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Oregon Non- Profit Corporation 178 Oregon Trail Council, Boy Franklin Doe FRANKLIN DOE, proceeding under a 19CV48367 In the Circuit Court Scouts of America pseudonym v. BOY SCOUTS OF of the State of AMERICA, a Congressionally Chartered Oregon, Lane Corporation, authorized to do business in County Oregon; and OREGON TRAIL COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation 179 Penn Mountains Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 190800135 Court of Common Boy Scouts of America; Paul AMERICA and PENN MOUNTAINS Pleas, Philadelphia Antosh COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF County AMERICA and PAUL ANTOSH 180 Cradle of Liberty Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 190800955 Court of Common Inc., Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA, CRADLE OF LIBERTY Pleas, Philadelphia Michael Forbes; William COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF County Thomas Forbes AMERICA, MICHAEL FORBES, and WILLIAM THOMAS FORBES 181 , [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 19-16687 Court of Common Inc., Boy Scouts of America AMERICA; HAWK MOUNTAIN Pleas, Berks d/b/a Pack 0315; COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF County Reformation Lutheran AMERICA d/b/a PACK 0315; Church; C.P. REFORMATION LUTHERAN CHURCH; and C.P. Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 54 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 182 Corporation of the President John Doe C.J. JOHN DOE C.J. v. CORPORATION OF 190700977 Second District of the Church of Jesus Christ THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH of Court, Davis of Latter-Day Saints; Great JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY County Salt Lake Council, BSA; SAINTS; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Thomas M. Thackeray a federally-chartered nonprofit corporation; , BSA, a Utah nonprofit corporation; THOMAS M. THACKERAY, an individual 183 Heart of Virginia Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Heart of Virginia Council, 760CL17005659-00 In the Circuit Court Inc., Boy Scouts of America Inc., Boy Scouts of America and Boy of the City of Scouts of America Richmond 184 Blue Ridge Mountains [Redacted] [Redacted] v. SAMUEL ROCHE, CL19-3104-3 In the Circuit Court Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of MADISON OSBORNE, THOMAS of the City of America; First Baptist SCOTT, BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS Richmond Church of Danville d/b/a COUNCIL, INCORPORATED, BOY Boy Scouts Troop 354; SCOUTS OF AMERICA, and FIRST Samuel Roche; Madison BAPTIST CHURCH OF DANVILLE Osborne; Thomas Scott d/b/a BOY SCOUT TROOP 354 185 Evergreen Area Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 19-2-20669-1 SEA Superior Court of Boy Scouts of America, AMERICA, a congressionally chartered the State of n/k/a Mount Baker Council, corporation authorized to do business in Washington in and Boy Scouts of America the State of Washington; EVERGREEN for County of King AREA COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, n/k/a MOUNT BAKER COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 186 , Boy [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 19-2-25631-1 SEA Superior Court of Scouts of America AMERICA, a congressionally chartered the State of corporation authorized to do business in Washington in and the State of Washington; CHIEF for County of King SEATTLE COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Washington nonprofit corporation Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 55 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 187 Evergreen Area Council, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 19-2-25644-3 SEA Superior Court of Boy Scouts of America, AMERICA, a congressionally chartered the State of n/k/a Mount Baker Council, corporation authorized to do business in Washington in and Boy Scouts of America the State of Washington; EVERGREEN for County of King AREA COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, n/k/a MOUNT BAKER COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Washington nonprofit corporation 188 Quapaw Area Council [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Boy Scouts of America, and 4:19-cv-00847 United States Incorporated of the Boy Quapaw Area Council Incorporated of the District Court Scouts of America Boy Scouts of America Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock Division 189 N/A John Does 1-8. JOHN DOES 1-8 v. BOY SCOUTS OF 1:20-CV-00017 United States AMERICA, a congressionally chartered District Court for corporation domiciled in the District of the District of Columbia Columbia 190 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:19-cv-00010 United States Aloha Counsel Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Louis Brouillard, an Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of individual, Doe Entites 1-5; AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam and Doe Individuals 6-50, corporation, authorized to do business in inclusive Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALOHA COUNSEL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual, DOE ENTITES 1-5; and DOE INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 191 Roman Catholic Archbishop [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Roman Catholic Archbishop 1:19-cv-00083 United States Of Agana; Andrew Of Agana, A Corporation Sole; Boy District Court for Mannetta, An Individual; Scouts Of America, A Congressionally the District of Doe Entities 1-5; Doe Chartered Corporation Authorized To Do Guam Individuals 6-10, Inclusive Business In Guam; Andrew Mannetta, An Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 56 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Individual; Doe Entities 1-5; Doe Individuals 6-10, Inclusive 192 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Roman Catholic Archbishop 1:19-cv-00067 United States Aloha Council Chamorro Of Agana, A Corporation Sole; Boy District Court for District; Doe Entities 1-5; Scouts Of America, A Congressionally the District of Doe Individuals 6-50; Chartered Corporation Authorized To Do Guam Roman Catholic Archbishop Business In Guam; Boy Scouts Of Of Agana America Aloha Council Chamorro District; Doe Entities 1-5; Doe Individuals 6-50 193 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00088 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Concepcion; Roman ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Catholic Archbishop Of DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Agana; Louis Brouillard individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF Individuals 6-48, inclusive DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 194 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00036 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 57 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 195 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00004 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, and individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 196 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00042 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Concepcion; Roman ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Catholic Archbishop Of DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Agana; Louis Brouillard; individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF Individuals 6-48, inclusive DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 197 Capuchin Franciscans; [Redacted] [Redacted] v. CAPUCHIN 1:19-cv-00116 United States Capuchin Franciscans, FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN District Court for Province of St. Mary; FRANCISCANS, PROVINCE OF ST. the District of Capuchin Franciscans MARY; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS Guam Custody of Star of the Sea; CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; Boy Scouts of America BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Aloha Counsel Chamorro congressionally chartered corporation, District; Doe Entities 1-5; authorized to do business in Guam; BOY and Doe-Individuals 6-50, SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALOHA inclusive COUNSEL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 58 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 198 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00022 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 199 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00005 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 200 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00024 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Conception; Roman Catholic ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Archbishop Of Agana; Louis DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Brouillard, an individual; individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF Individuals 6-48, inclusive DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL OF THE IMMACULATE Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 59 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency CONCEPTION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 201 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00129 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 202 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00125 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 203 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00107 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, and individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 204 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00046 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 60 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, and individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 205 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00048 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Conception; Roman Catholic ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Archbishop Of Agana; Louis DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Brouillard, an individual; individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF Individuals 6-48, inclusive DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 206 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00035 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 207 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00006 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 61 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 208 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00020 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Tomas A. Camacho, an Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA individual; Doe Entities 1-5; ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO and Doe-Individuals 6-50, DISTRICT; TOMAS A. CAMACHO, an inclusive individual, LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 209 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00049 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 210 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00023 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 62 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 211 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-CV-00101 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual, DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 212 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00098 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOES ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 213 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00037 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 63 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 214 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00100 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 215 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00057 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 216 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00021 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 217 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00025 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 64 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 218 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00019 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 219 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00077 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 220 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00087 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 65 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Individuals 6-50, inclusive DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 221 Capuchin Franciscans; [Redacted] [Redacted] v. CAPUCHIN 1:19-cv-00118 United States Capuchin Franciscans, FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN District Court for Province of St. Mary; FRANCISCANS, PROVINCE OF ST. the District of Capuchin Franciscans MARY; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS Guam Custody of Star of the Sea; CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; Boy Scouts of America BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Aloha Counsel Chamorro congressionally chartered corporation, District ; Doe Entities 1-5; authorized to do business in Guam; BOY and Doe-Individuals 6-50, SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALOHA inclusive COUNSEL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 222 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:18-cv-00001 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 223 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00123 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Capuchin Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Franciscans; Capuchin AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Franciscans Province of St. corporation, authorized to do business in Mary; Capuchin Franciscans Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Custody of Star of the Sea; ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Roman Catholic Archbishop DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 66 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Of Agana; Louis Brouillard, individual; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS; an individual; Doe Entities CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS 1-5; and Doe-Individuals 6- PROVINCE OF ST. MARY; CAPUCHIN 47, inclusive FRANCISCANS CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-47, inclusive 224 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00061 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 225 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00034 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 226 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00026 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 67 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 227 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00121 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Concepcion; Roman ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Catholic Archbishop Of DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Agana; Louis Brouillard, an individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE individual; Doe Entities 1-5; NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF and Doe-Individuals 6-48, DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL inclusive OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 228 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00075 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 229 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00007 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 68 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 230 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00052 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 231 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00130 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 232 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00106 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 233 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:18-cv-00008 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 69 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 234 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00095 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 235 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00082 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 236 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00054 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 70 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Individuals 6-50, inclusive DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 237 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00067 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 238 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00122 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 239 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00063 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 71 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 240 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:18-cv-00004 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 241 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:18-cv-00018 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Capuchin Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Franciscans; Capuchin AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Franciscans Province of St. corporation, authorized to do business in Mary; Capuchin Franciscans Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Custody of Star of the Sea; ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Roman Catholic Archbishop DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Of Agana; Louis Brouillard, individual; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS; an individual; Doe Entities CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS 1-5; and Doe-Individuals 6- PROVINCE OF ST. MARY; CAPUCHIN 47, inclusive FRANCISCANS CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-47, inclusive 242 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00047 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 72 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 243 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00109 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District ; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 244 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00039 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 245 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00120 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Concepcion; Roman ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Catholic Archbishop Of DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Agana; Louis Brouillard, an individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE individual; Doe Entities 1-5; NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF and Doe-Individuals 6-48, DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL inclusive OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 73 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 246 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00015 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 247 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 1:19-cv-00133 United States Aloha Council Chamorro AMERICA, a congressionally chartered District Court for District; Capuchin corporation, authorized to do business in the District of Franciscans; Capuchin Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Guam Franciscans Province of St. ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Mary; Capuchin Franciscans DISTRICT; CAPUCHIN Custody of Star of the Sea; FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- FRANCISCANS PROVINCE OF ST. Individuals 6-47, inclusive MARY; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-47, inclusive 248 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00045 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 249 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:18-cv-00036 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 74 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency District; Capuchin Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Franciscans; Capuchin AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Franciscans Province of St. corporation, authorized to do business in Mary; Roman Catholic Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Archbishop Of Agana; Louis ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Brouillard, an individual; DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- individual; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS; Individuals 6-50, inclusive CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS PROVINCE OF ST. MARY; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 250 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00038 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 251 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 1:17-cv-00084 United States Aloha Council Chamorro AMERICA, a congressionally chartered District Court for District; Doe Entities 1-5; corporation, authorized to do business in the District of and Doe-Individuals 6-50, Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Guam inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 252 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00003 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District ; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 75 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Individuals 6-50, inclusive DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 253 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00008 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 254 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00066 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Concepcion; Roman ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Catholic Archbishop Of DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Agana; Louis Brouillard, an individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE individual; Doe Entities 1-5; NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF and Doe-Individuals 6-48, DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL inclusive OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 255 Capuchin Franciscans; [Redacted] [Redacted] v. CAPUCHIN 1:19-cv-00115 United States Capuchin Franciscans FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN District Court for Province of St. Mary; FRANCISCANS PROVINCE OF ST. the District of Capuchin Franciscans MARY; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS Guam Custody of Star of the Sea; CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; Boy Scouts of America BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 76 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Aloha Council Chamorro congressionally chartered corporation, District; Doe Entities 1-5; authorized to do business in Guam; BOY and Doe-Individuals 6-50, SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALOHA inclusive COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 256 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:19-cv-00039 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 257 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00055 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 258 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 1:18-cv-00023 United States Aloha Council Chamorro AMERICA, a congressionally chartered District Court for District; David Joseph corporation, authorized to do business in the District of Ellington, an individual; Doe Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Guam Entities 1-5; and Doe- ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Individuals 6-50, inclusive DISTRICT; DAVID JOSEPH ELLINGTON, an individual; DOE Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 77 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 259 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00080 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Concepcion; Roman ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Catholic Archbishop Of DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Agana; Louis Brouillard, an individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE individual; Doe Entities 1-5; NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF and Doe-Individuals 6-48, DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL inclusive OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 260 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00115 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Roman Catholic Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Archbishop Of Agana; Louis AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam Brouillard, an individual; corporation, authorized to do business in Doe Entities 1-5; and Doe- Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Individuals 6-50, inclusive ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an individual; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 261 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00081 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Concepcion; Roman ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Catholic Archbishop Of DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 78 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Agana; Louis Brouillard, an individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE individual; Doe Entities 1-5; NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF and Doe-Individuals 6-48, DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL inclusive OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 262 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. ROMAN CATHOLIC 1:17-cv-00047 United States Aloha Council Chamorro ARCHBISHOP OF AGANA, a District Court for District; Discalced Carmelite Corporation sole; BOY SCOUTS OF the District of Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Guam of Discalced Carmelites; corporation, authorized to do business in Carmel of the Immaculate Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Concepcion; Roman ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Catholic Archbishop Of DISTRICT; LOUIS BROUILLARD, an Agana; Louis Brouillard, an individual; DISCALCED CARMELITE individual; Doe Entities 1-5; NUNS (O.C.D.) a.k.a. ORDER OF and Doe-Individuals 6-48, DISCALCED CARMELITES; CARMEL inclusive OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPCION; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-48, inclusive 263 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 1:20-cv-00005 United States Aloha Counsel Chamorro AMERICA, a congressionally chartered District Court for District; Doe Entities 1-5; corporation, authorized to do business in the District of and Doe-Individuals 6-50, Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA Guam inclusive ALOHA COUNSEL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 264 Brandon Wood; Kenneth [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Brandon Wood; Kenneth 3:18-cv-00157 United States Betts; Curtis Flaherty; Betts; Curtis Flaherty; Louisville Metro District Court Louisville Metro Police Police Department, City of Louisville, Western District of Department, City of Jefferson County / Louisville Consolidated Kentucky Louisville, Jefferson County Government; Lincoln Heritage Council, Louisville Division / Louisville Consolidated Inc., Boy Scouts of America; The Boy Government; Lincoln Scouts of America; Unknown Officers of Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 79 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Heritage Council, Inc., Boy Louisville Metro Police Department; Scouts of America; Unknown Employees , Agents AND/OR Unknown Officers of Servants of City of Louisville/Jefferson Louisville Metro Police County/Louisville Consolidated Department; Unknown Government; Unknown Employees, Employees, Agents Agents AND/OR Servants of Lincoln AND/OR Servants of City of Heritage Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of Louisville/Jefferson America; Unknown Employees, Agents County/Louisville AND/OR Servants of The Boy Scouts of Consolidated Government; America; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning Unknown Employees, for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. Agents AND/OR Servants of Lincoln Heritage Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of The Boy Scouts of America; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. 265 Kenneth Betts; Brandon [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Kenneth Betts; Brandon 3:18-cv-00176 United States Wood; Casey Scott; Curtis Wood; Casey Scott; Curtis Flaherty; City District Court Flaherty; City of Louisville, of Louisville, Jefferson County / Western District of Jefferson County / Louisville Louisville Consolidated Government; Kentucky Consolidated Government; Lincoln Heritage Council, Inc., Boy Louisville Division Lincoln Heritage Council, Scouts of America; The Boy Scouts of Inc., Boy Scouts of America; America; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning Learning for Life, Inc.; for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc.; Unknown Learning for Life Lincoln Officers of Louisville Metro Police Chapter, Inc.; Unknown Department; Unknown Employees, Agents Officers of Louisville Metro AND/OR Servants of City of Police Department; Louisville/Jefferson County/Louisville Unknown Employees, Consolidated Government; Unknown Agents AND/OR Servants of Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 80 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency City of Louisville/Jefferson Lincoln Heritage Council, Inc., Boy County/Louisville Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Consolidated Government; Agents AND/OR Servants of The Boy Unknown Employees, Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Agents AND/OR Servants of Learning for Lincoln Heritage Council, Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. Inc., Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of The Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. 266 Kenneth Betts; Brandon [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Kenneth Betts; Brandon 3:18-cv-00306 United States Wood; Curtis Flaherty; Wood; Curtis Flaherty; Louisville Metro District Court Louisville Metro Police Police Department; City of Louisville, Western District of Department; City of Jefferson County / Louisville Consolidated Kentucky Louisville, Jefferson County Government; Unknown Officers of Louisville Division / Louisville Consolidated Louisville Metro Police Department; Government; Unknown Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Officers of Louisville Metro Servants of City of Louisville/Jefferson Police Department; County/Louisville Consolidated Unknown Employees, Government; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Agents AND/OR Servants of Lincoln City of Louisville/Jefferson Heritage Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of County/Louisville America; Unknown Employees, Agents Consolidated Government; AND/OR Servants of The Boy Scouts of Unknown Employees, America; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning Agents AND/OR Servants of for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. Lincoln Heritage Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 81 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency The Boy Scouts of America; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. 267 Bradley Schumann; Matthew [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Bradley Schumann; 3:18-cv-00151 United States Gelhausen; Kenneth Betts; Matthew Gelhausen; Kenneth Betts; District Court Brandon Wood; Curtis Brandon Wood; Curtis Flaherty; Julie Western District of Flaherty; Julie Schmidt; Schmidt; Louisville Metro Police Kentucky Louisville Metro Police Department; Lincoln Heritage Council, Louisville Division Department; Lincoln Inc. Boy Scouts of America; The Boy Heritage Council, Inc. Boy Scouts of America; Learning for Life, Inc.; Scouts of America; Learning Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc.; for Life, Inc.; Learning for City of Louisville, Jefferson County / Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc.; Louisville Consolidated Government; City of Louisville, Jefferson Unknown Officers of Louisville Metro County / Louisville Police Department; Unknown Employees, Consolidated Government; Agents AND/OR Servants of City of Unknown Officers of Louisville/Jefferson County/Louisville Louisville Metro Police Consolidated Government; Unknown Department; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Employees, Agents Lincoln Heritage Council, Inc., Boy AND/OR Servants of City of Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Louisville/Jefferson Agents AND/OR Servants of The Boy County/Louisville Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Consolidated Government; Agents AND/OR Servants of Learning for Unknown Employees, Life, Inc.; Unknown Employees, Agents Agents AND/OR Servants of AND/OR Servants of Learning for Life Lincoln Heritage Council, Lincoln Chapter, Inc. Inc., Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of The Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 82 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Learning for Life, Inc.; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. 268 Kenneth Betts; Curtis [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Kenneth Betts; Curtis 3:18-cv-00152 United States Flaherty; City of Louisville, Flaherty; City of Louisville, Jefferson District Court Jefferson County / Louisville County / Louisville Consolidated Western District of Consolidated Government; Government; Lincoln Heritage Council, Kentucky Lincoln Heritage Council, Inc. Boy Scouts of America; The Boy Louisville Division Inc. Boy Scouts of America; Scouts of America; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc.; Learning for Life Lincoln Unknown Officers; Unknown Employees, Chapter, Inc. Agents and/or Servants of 269 Kenneth Betts; Brandon [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Kenneth Betts; Brandon 3:18-cv-00153 United States Wood; Curtis Flaherty; Julie Wood; Curtis Flaherty; Julie Schmidt; District Court Schmidt; Louisville Metro Louisville Metro Police Department; Paul Western District of Police Department; Paul Brandon Paris; City of Louisville, Kentucky Brandon Paris; City of Jefferson County / Louisville Consolidated Louisville Division Louisville, Jefferson County Government; Lincoln Heritage Council, / Louisville Consolidated Inc. Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Government; Lincoln Officers of Louisville Metro Police Heritage Council, Inc. Boy Department; The Boy Scouts of America; Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Unknown Employees, Servants of Lincoln Heritage Council, Agents AND/OR Servants of Inc., Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Lincoln Heritage Council, Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Inc., Boy Scouts of America; City of Louisville/Jefferson Unknown Employees, County/Louisville Consolidated Agents AND/OR Servants of Government; Learning for Life, Inc.; City of Louisville/Jefferson Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. County/Louisville Consolidated Government; Learning for Life, Inc.; Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 83 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. 270 Kenneth Betts; Curtis [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Kenneth Betts; Curtis 3:18-cv-00158 United States Flaherty; City of Louisville, Flaherty; City of Louisville, Jefferson District Court Jefferson County / Louisville County / Louisville Consolidated Western District of Consolidated Government; Government; Lincoln Heritage Council, Kentucky Lincoln Heritage Council, Inc. Boy Scouts of America; The Boy Louisville Division Inc. Boy Scouts of America; Scouts of America; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning for Life, Inc.; Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc.; Learning for Life Lincoln Unknown Officers of Louisville Metro Chapter, Inc.; Unknown Police Department; Unknown Employees, Officers of Louisville Metro Agents AND/OR Servants of City of Police Department; Louisville/Jefferson County/Louisville Unknown Employees, Consolidated Government; Unknown Agents AND/OR Servants of Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of City of Louisville/Jefferson Lincoln Heritage Council, Inc., Boy County/Louisville Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Consolidated Government; Agents AND/OR Servants of The Boy Unknown Employees, Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Agents AND/OR Servants of Learning for Lincoln Heritage Council, Life, Inc.; Unknown Employees, Agents Inc., Boy Scouts of America; AND/OR Servants of Learning for Life Unknown Employees, Lincoln Chapter, Inc. Agents AND/OR Servants of The Boy Scouts of America; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Learning for Life, Inc.; Unknown Employees, Agents AND/OR Servants of Learning for Life Lincoln Chapter, Inc. 271 Cascade Charter Township; Jane Doe JANE DOE v. CASCADE CHARTER 1:18-cv-00988 United States Michigan Crossroads TOWNSHIP; BOY SCOUTS OF District Court for Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 84 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency Council, Inc. Boy Scouts of AMERICA; MICHIGAN CROSSROADS the Western America; Learning for Life COUNCIL, INC., BOY SCOUTS OF District of AMERICA; and LEARNING FOR LIFE Michigan 272 Town of Deerfield; Mark [Redacted] [Redacted] v. TOWN OF DEERFIELD; 1:19-00697-JL United States Tibbets, in his individual and MARK TIBBETTS, in his individual and District Court of official capacity; Daniel official capacity; BOY SCOUTS OF New Hampshire Webster Council, Inc.; AMERICA, DANIEL WEBSTER Learning for Life COUNCIL, INC.; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; AND LEARNING FOR LIFE 273 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 1:20-cv-00315 United States Boy Scouts of America; AMERICA; GREATER NEW YORK District Court Brooklyn Council, Boy COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF Eastern District of Scouts of America AMERICA; and BROOKLYN New York COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 274 Doe Defendant 1; Doe [Redacted] [Redacted] v. DOE DEFENDANT 1; 20STCV04460 Superior Court of Defendant 2; Does 3 DOE DEFENDANT 2; DOES 3 the State of Through 10, Inclusive THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE California, County of Los Angeles, Central District 275 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 1:20-cv-00008 United States Aloha Counsel Chamorro AMERICA, a congressionally chartered District Court of District; Doe Entities 1-5; corporation, authorized to do business in Guam Doe-Individuals 6-50, Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA inclusive ALOHA COUNSEL CHAMORRO DISTRICT; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 6-50, inclusive 276 Fairfield County Council of James Doe JAMES DOE v. FAIRFIELD COUNTY Superior Court of Boy Scouts of America, Inc.; COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF Stamford/Norwalk Connecticut Yankee AMERICA, INC.; CONNECTICUT at Stamford Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of YANKEE COUNCIL, INC., BOY America SCOUTS OF AMERICA 277 Westchester-Putnam John Doe JOHN DOE v. BOY SCOUTS OF Supreme Court of Council, Inc. AMERICA, and WESTCHESTER- the State of New Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 85 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency PUTNAM COUNCIL, INC., BOY York, County of SCOUTS OF AMERICA Westchester 278 Aloha Council Chamorro [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 1:20-cv-00009 In the District District; Capuchin AMERICA, a congressionally chartered Court of Guam Franciscans; Capuchin corporation, authorized to do business in Franciscans Province of St. Guam; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA May; Capuchin Franciscans ALOHA COUNCIL CHAMORRO Custody of Star of the Sea; DISTRICT; CAPUCHIN DOE ENTITIES 1-5; DOE- FRANCISCANS; CAPUCHIN INDIVIDUALS 6-47, FRANCISCANS PROVINCE OF ST. inclusive MARY; CAPUCHIN FRANCISCANS CUSTODY OF STAR OF THE SEA; DOE ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE- INDIVIDUALS 6-47, inclusive 279 Garden State Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008047-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA; GARDEN STATE New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 280 Jersey Shore Council; John [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF MID-L-008049-19 Superior Court of Does 1-10 AMERICA, JERSEY SHORE COUNCIL, New Jersey, AND JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 281 Greater New York Councils, [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOY SCOUTS OF 950041/2020 Supreme Court of Boy Scouts of America; The AMERICA and GREATER NEW YORK the State of New Roman Catholic COUNCILS, BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of Archdiocese of New York; AMERICA, THE ROMAN CATHOLIC New York The Apostles of the Sacred ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK, THE Heart of Jesus a/k/a The APOSTLES OF THE SACRED HEART Apostles of the Sacred Heart OF JESUS a/k/a THE APOSTLES OF of Jesus, of New York, Inc. THE SACRED HEART OF JESUS, OF f/k/a Missionary Zelatrices NEW YORK, INC. f/k/a MISSIONARY of the Sacred Heart, Inc. ZELATRICES OF THE SACRED HEART, INC. Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 86 of 95

Underlying Plaintiff(s) Non-Debtor Defendants(s) (last, first) Case Caption Case Number Court or Agency 282 Boy Scouts of America [Redacted] [Redacted] v. Boy Scouts of America, 50972/2020 Supreme Court of Westchester-Putnam Inc., and Boy Scouts of America the State of New Council, Inc. Westchester-Putnam Council, Inc. York, County of Westchester 283 Maryvale Union Free School Anonymous ANONYMOUS v. MARYVALE UNION 802143/2020 Supreme Court of District; Greater Niagara FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT; BOY the State of New Frontier Council SCOUTS OF AMERICA and GREATER York, County of NIAGARA FRONTIER COUNCIL Erie 284 Northern New Jersey [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOYS SCOUTS OF MID-L-008050-19 Superior Court of Council; John Does 1-10 AMERICA; NORTHERN NEW JERSEY New Jersey, COUNCIL; JOHN DOES 1-10 Middlesex County Law Division 285 Greater New York Councils [Redacted] [Redacted] v. BOYS SCOUTS OF 950042/2020 Supreme Court of of the Boy Scouts of AMERICA, GREATER NEW YORK the State of New America; Fordham COUNCILS of the BOY SCOUTS OF York, County of University; John and Jane AMERICA; FORDHAM UNIVERSITY; New York Doe 1-30; members of the JOHN and JANE DOE 1-30; members of Board of Trustees of the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF Fordham University, in their FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, in their official and individual official and individual capacities, whose capacities, whose identities identities are presently unknown to are presently unknown to Plaintiff, ROMAN CATHOLIC ORDER Plaintiff, Roman Catholic OF JESUITS USA PROVINCE Order of Jesuits USA NORTHEAST a/k/a THE USA Province Northeast a/k/a The NORTHEAST PROVINCE OF THE USA Northeast Province of SOCIETY OF JESUS, INC.; ROMAN the Society of Jesus, Inc.; CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW Roman Catholic YORK; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE; Archdiocese of New York; RICHARD ROE; JANE ROE, priests, John Doe; Jane Doe; Richard clergy, and administrators whose names Roe; Jane Roe, priests, are unknown to the Plaintiff clergy, and administrators whose names are unknown to the Plaintiff

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 87 of 95

EXHIBIT B

BSA RELATED PARTIES

Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 88 of 95

I. BSA Affiliated Organizations

Learning for Life

II. Local Councils

Katahdin Area Council Longhouse Council

Pine Tree Council Five Rivers Council

Cape Cod and Islands Council Iroquois Trail Council

Spirit of Adventure Council Greater Niagara Frontier Council

Heart of New England Council Seneca Waterways Council

Mayflower Council Leatherstocking Council

Daniel Webster Council Green Mountain Council

Narragansett Council Allegheny Highlands Council

Connecticut Rivers Council Juniata Valley Council

Greenwich Council Moraine Trails Council

Housatonic Council Columbia-Montour Council

Connective Yankee Council Bucktail Council

Western Massachusetts Council Westmoreland-Fayette Council

Hudson Valley Council Laurel Highlands Council

Theodore Roosevelt Council

Westchester-Putnam Council Susquehanna Council

Suffolk County Council Chief Cornplanter Council

Rip Van Winkle Council Northern New Jersey Council

Greater New York Council Jersey Shore Council

Twin Rivers Council Monmouth Council

Baden-Powell Council Patriot’s Path Council Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 89 of 95

Northeastern Pennsylvania Council

Minsi Trail Council

Cradle of Liberty Council Norwela Council

Puerto Rico Council Texas Trails Council

Garden State Council

Washington Crossing Council

Transatlantic Council Caddo Area Council

Del-Mar-Va Council East Texas Area Council

National Capital Area Council Northwest Texas Council

Baltimore Area Council Longhorn Council

Mason-Dixon Council

Pennsylvania Dutch Council Capitol Area Council

Hawk Mountain Council Buffalo Trail Council

Chester County Council Bay Area Council

New Birth of Freedom Council Sam Houston Area Council

Alabama-Florida Council South Texas Council

Mobile Area Council Three Rivers Council

Calcasieu Area Council Alamo Area Council

Istrouma Area Council Texas Southwest Council

Evangeline Area Council Rio Grande Council

Louisiana Purchase Council Central Florida Council

Southeast Louisiana Council

Choctaw Area Council

Andrew Jackson Council North Florida Council

Pine Burr Area Council Southwest Florida Council Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 90 of 95

Greater Tampa Bay Area Council East Carolina Council

Suwannee River Area Council Old Hickory Council

Georgia-Carolina Council Colonial Virginia Council

Daniel Boone Council

Mecklenburg County Council Shenandoah Area Council

Central North Carolina Council Blue Ridge Mountains Council

Piedmont Council Heart of Virginia Council

Palmetto Council Stonewall Jackson Area Council

Coastal Carolina Council De Soto Area Council

Blue Ridge Council Westark Area Council

Pee Dee Area Council Quapaw Area Council

Indian Waters Council Arbuckle Area Council

Blue Grass Council Cherokee Area Council

Lincoln Heritage Council Cimarron Council

Cherokee Area Council Last Frontier Council

Great Smoky Mountain Council Indian Nations Council

Chickasaw Council Greater Alabama Council

West Tennessee Area Council Tukabatchee Area Council

Middle Tennessee Council Black Warrior Council

Sequoyah Council Chattahoochee Council

Yocona Area Council

Old North State Council

Occoneechee Council

Tuscarora Council

Cape Fear Council Coastal Georgia Council Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 91 of 95

Northwest Georgia Council

Northeast Georgia Council

Northern Star Council Greater St. Louis Area Council

Twin Valley Council Great Trail Council

Voyageurs Area Council

Central Minnesota Council Lake Erie Council

Gamehaven Council

Northern Lights Council Muskigum Valley Council

Gateway Area Council Mountaineer Area Council

Samoset Council

Bay-Lakes Council Ohio River Valley Council

Chippewa Valley Council Mid-Iowa Council

Black Hills Area Council

Sioux Council Santa Fe Trail Council

Michigan Crossroads Council Jayhawk Area Council

President Ford FSC Council Quivira Council

Water and Woods FSC Council Ozark Trails Council

Southern Shores FSC Council Heart of America Council

Great Lakes FSC Council Pony Express Council

Prairielands Council Overland Trails Council

Illowa Council Cornhusker Council

W.D. Boyce Council Mid-America Council

Mississippi Valley Council Great Rivers Council

Abraham Lincoln Council Hoosier Trails Council

Hawkeye Area Council Buffalo Trace Council Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 92 of 95

Anthony Wayne Area Council Pacific Harbors Council

Crossroads of America Council Grand Columbia Council

Sagamore Council Midnight Sun Council

La Salle Council Oregon Trail Council

Dan Beard Council Pikes Peak Council

Tecumseh Council Denver Area Council

Miami Valley Council Longs Peak Council

Black Swamp Area Council Rocky Mountain Council

Erie Shores Council Grand Teton Council

Three Fires Council Snake River Council

Northeast Illinois Council Montana Council

Pathway to Adventure Council

Glacier’s Edge Council Great Salt Lake Council

Three Harbors Council Utah National Parks Council

Potawatomi Area Council Greater Wyoming Council

Blackhawk Area Council

Rainbow Council Mount Diablo Silverado Council

Ore-Ida Council

Crater Lake Council San Francisco Bay Area Council

Cascade Pacific Council

Blue Mountain Council

Mount Baker Council

Chief Seattle Council Piedmon Council

Great Alaska Council

Inland Northwest Council Silicon Valley Monterey Bay Council Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 93 of 95

Greater Yosemite Council Grand Canyon Council

Nevada Area Council Catalina Council

Southern Sierra Council San Diego-Imperial Council

Long Beach Area Council Aloha Council

Greater Las Vegas Area Council

Orange County Council Great Southwest Council

California Inland Empire Council Conquistador Council

Western Los Angeles County Council Yucca Council

Los Padres Council Far East Council

Venture County Council

Verdugo Hills Council Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 94 of 95

III. Named Chartered Organizations

All Saints R.C. Church First Baptist Church of Danville d/b/a Boy Scout Troop 354 Archdiocese of New York First Baptist Church of Gainesville Audubon Baptist Church Glens Falls City School District Beech Haven Baptist Church Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America Big Cross Elementary School Green Acres Baptist Church Bishop Turner High School Holy Family Church Calasanctius School of Buffalo Holy Family R.C. Church Canisius High School of Buffalo House of Hope Presbyterian Church Capuchin Franciscans Immaculate Conception R.C. Church Capuchin Franciscans Custody of Star of the Sea Louisville Metro Police Department, City of Louisville, Jefferson County / Louisville Capuchin Franciscans Province of St. Mary Consolidated Government

Carmel of the Immaculate Concepcion Mohawk District of the Northern New York

Cascade Charter Township Annual Conference of the Methodist

Church of the Holy Innocents Episcopal Church of New York

City of Bloomingdale, Georgia Monastery of Christ in the Desert

Corporation of the President of the Church Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic School of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Our Savior Lutheran Church Country Farm Supply Queen of Peace R.C. Church Diocese of Brooklyn Reformation Lutheran Church Diocese of Buffalo Regis High School Discalced Carmelite Nuns (O.C.D.) a.k.a. Order of Discalced Carmelites Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York, Archdiocese of New York First Baptist Church of Athens Case 20-50527 Doc 14-1 Filed 02/26/20 Page 95 of 95

Roman Catholic Parish of St. Frances St. Josephat’s R.C. Church Xavier Cabrini, Rochester NY (formerly "Church of the Annunciation of Rochester, St. Nicholas of Tolentine New York"), a religious corporation St. Pauls R.C. Church Sacred Heart - Espanola St. Pius V Saint John the Baptist Church St. Pius X Catholic Church of Rochester, School Sisters of Notre Dame Central Minnesota Pacific Province, Inc. St. Teresa Parish a/k/a Church of St. Teresa School Sisters of Notre Dame, Region of of the Infant Jesus Guam St. Teresa’s R.C. Church Silver Springs Shores Presbyterian Church, The Blessed Trinity R.C. Church Inc.

The Diocese of Rochester (a/k/a "Roman Society of Jesus, USA-Northeast Province Catholic Diocese of Rochester"), a religious a/k/a the Jesuits corporation

St. Ambrose Church The Foundation of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Buffalo N.Y., Inc. St. Benedict Joseph Labre Church

The Pingry School St. Benedict Joseph Labre School

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Syracuse St. Bridget’s R.C. Church

The School Sisters of Notre Dame, St. Catherine's Roman Catholic Church Milwaukee Province, Inc.

St. Catherine's Roman Catholic Church Town Of Deerfield School

Town Of Trumbull St. Demetrios Greek Orthodox Church

University Heights Presbyterian Church St. Francis of Assisi Roman Catholic

Church USA Northeast Province of the Society of

Jesus St. Francis Xavier Church

Weedsport Central School District St. Helena Parish

Weedsport Central School District Board of St. John Gualbert’s R.C. Church Education

St. John Vianney R.C. Church