Ground-Water Potential of the Leadville Limestone on the White River Uplift in Garfi Eld and Rio Blanco Counties, Colorado

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ground-Water Potential of the Leadville Limestone on the White River Uplift in Garfi Eld and Rio Blanco Counties, Colorado GROUND-WATER POTENTIAL OF THE LEADVILLE LIMESTONE ON THE WHITE RIVER UPLIFT IN GARFIELD AND RIO BLANCO COUNTIES, COLORADO By Ralph W. Teller and Frank A. Welder U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 83-^036 Lakewood, Colorado 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Of THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information For sale by: write to: Open-File Services Section District Chief Western Distribution Branch U.S. Geological Survey, MS U.S. Geological Survey, MS 306 Box 25046, Denver Federal Center Box 25^25, Federal Center Lakewood, CO 80225 Denver, CO 80225 Telephone: (303) 23^-5888 CONTENTS Page Abstract--------------- ---- ----- ______________ __ ____ ____ -j Introduction----- ---------------- ___________ __ ____ __________ -j Purpose and scope-------------------------------------------------- 2 Location and size of study area------------------------------------ 2 Previous invest 5 gat ions-------------------------------------------- 2 Geology----------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Stratigraphy----- ------------------------ ____________ __ __ 2 Precambrian rocks--------------------------------------------- 5 Paleozoic rocks----------------------------------------------- 5 Mesozoic rocks------------------ -------- ---- ________ 5 Cenozoi c rocks------------------------------------------------ 8 Structure---------------------------------------------------------- 8 Hydrogeologic characteristics of the Leadville Limestone---------------- 8 Porosi ty----------------------------------------------------------- 8 Permeabi1jty------------------------------------------------------- 10 Flow pattern----------------------------------- -- ------ ---- 12 Springs------------ ---------------- - ---- __________________ 12 Water qualfty---------------------------------------------------- 12 Numbering system----------------------------------------------- -- 18 Need for future investigations-------------------- -------------------- 18 Seepage-run analysis----------------------------------------------- 18 Isotope studies---------------------------------------------------- 20 Exploratory drill ing---------------------------------------------------- 21 Cone 1 us ions------------------------------------------------------------- 22 Selected references---- --------------------------------------------- 22 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate 1. Measured strat{graphic section at Rifle Falls, Garfield County, Colorado--- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --- In pocket 2. Map showing location of springs on the White River Uplift, Garfield and Rio Blanco Counties, Colorado---- In pocket Figure 1. Map showing location of study area------------------------- 3 2. Generalized east-west geologic section----------------------- 6 3. Map showing extent and thickness of the Eagle Valley Evapo- rite in northwestern Colorado------------------------------ 7 k. Map showing structure contours on top of the Leadville Limestone-------------------------------------------------- 9 5. Diagram showing system of spring location used in Colorado--- 19 6. Map showing potential areas for exploratory drilling sites--- 21 i i i TABLES Page Table 1. Generalized geohydrologic section-­ ri_ tfi,. L 10 Art9 » Springs inventoried in the study an ^ "" ~~~ -- - - |J} 3. Chemical quality of water from sele ;ted springs, September 5, i oQ 1 _ _ _ i -7 METRIC CONVERSI0N The inch-pound units used in this repbrt may be converted to nterna- tional System of Units (Si) by the following bonversion factors: Multiply By To obtain acre 0.40^7 hectare acre-foot ,233 cubic meter cubic foot per second 0.02832 cubic meter per second foot 0.3048 meter gal Ion per minute 6.309x10' 5 cubic meter per second i nch 25.^0 mi 11imeter mi le 1.609 kilometer square mi 1e 2.590 square kilometer National Geodetic Vert-Loal Datum of 1929: A geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called mean sea level. IV GROUND-WATER POTENTIAL OF THE LEADVILLE LIMESTONE ON THE WHITE RIVER UPLIFT IN GARFI ELD AND RIO BLANCO COUNTIES, COLORADO By Ralph W. Teller and Frank A. Welder ABSTRACT The Leadville Limestone of Mississippian age crops out in a large area in the western part of the White River Uplift in northwestern Colorado. Preliminary studies indicate that the Leadville is extensively fractured, cavernous, and water bearing and is recharged by precipitation, snowmelt, and streamflow. Water from 100 springs flowing from the Leadville is chemically suitable for most uses; specific conductance ranges from 45 to 1,950 micro- mhos per centimeter at 25° Celsius. The water is of the calcium carbonate type and is successfully used in the raising of game fish. On the flanks of the White River Uplift, where the Leadville dips into the subsurface, the formation probably is permeable and water bearing. Exploratory drilling and testing are needed to determine more exactly the water-bearing potential of the Leadville Limestone and its potential as a water supply for expanding energy development in the area. INTRODUCTION Expanded development of energy resources in northwestern Colorado is creating additional demands on the limited surface-water resources of the region. Along with the water demands for energy development is the threat of ecological deterioration as the natural flow of streams is decreased. Tradi­ tional surface-water impoundment for streamflow regulation is being chal­ lenged from both environmental and economic standpoints. Before irreversible management decisions are made to undertake the costly development of surface- water supplies, the potential of the ground-water resources needs to be defined and considered. During the 1960's investigations by the U.S. Geological Survey deter­ mined that large quantities of ground water, perhaps 25 million acre-feet or more, occur above, within, and below oil-shale deposits in the Green River and Uinta Formations of Eocene age in the Piceance Basin of northwestern Col­ orado. Recent studies indicate that another major source of ground water may be the Leadville Limestone of Mississippian age. The Leadville is exposed throughout a large area on the White River Uplift and is directly recharged by precipitation, snowmelt, and streamflow. Hydrogeologic evidence indicates that the Leadville Limestone is a major aquifer and that large quantities of ground water have entered and are moving through the formation into the subsurface toward the south, west, and north­ west away from the White River Uplift. The Leadville Limestone on the flanks of the White River Uplift at relatively shallow depths of about 1 ,000 feet may constitute a major underground reservoir [aquifer) containing water that is chemically suitable for most uses, The drilling of several exploratory test holes could confirm this hypothesis. Purpose and Scofre This report describes a preliminary reconnaissance of the water-bearing properties of the Mississippian Leadville Limestone in the western part of the White River Uplift (synonymous with the White River Plateau). The purpose of this preliminary investigation is to determine areas of the Leadville Limestone suitable for exploratory drilling aihd testing at relatively shallow depths to confirm the quantity and quality of:water in storage. Location and Size of SjLudy Area The study area, approximately 420 square miles, is i n Rio Blanco and Garfield Counties (fig. l) in northwestern Colorado on the west flank of the White River Plateau, which is the physiograph c expression of the White River Uplift. The Plateau is bounded by the White River on the north, the volcanic Flat Tops on the east, and the Grand Hogback monocline on the south and west. The southern part of the study area is drained by tributaries of the Colorado River; the northern part is drained by the Wh ite River and its tributaries, Land-surface altitudes range from about 6,500 feet in the southern valleys to more than 10,000 feet on Burro Mountain. Previous Investiga t ions Some of the most detailed geologic wo rk on the White River Uplift was done by Bass and Northrup (1963). The study! by MaHory and others (1966) of the geology of the Flat Tops Primitive Area w^s followed by Mallory's (1971) detailed work on the Eagle Valley Evaporite of Pennsylvanian age. GEOLOGY Stratigraphy Rocks in the study area range in age from Precambrian through Quaternary (see table 1). This investigation is concerned primarily with the Leadville Limestone of Mississippian age. ______ ________I 40° BOUND ARYXOF STUDY__>£/ AREA Glenwood Canyon Base from U. S. Geological Survey State base map, 1969 10 15 MILES i 0 5 10 15 KILOMETERS Figure 1. Location of study area. Ta b 1 e 1 . Geneva lized geohyd?ologic eee 'ion of the White River Uplift :ra- them System Series St rat igraphic unit Physical characteristics Hydrologic characteristics Quater­ Holocene Glacial, landslide, Gravel, Sand, loess, and clay, undif- Some shallow wells yield less than and and alluvial de­ ferentiated; travertine deposits. 50 gallons per minute. Cenozolc nary Pleistocene posits ? Terti- Pliocene(T) Basalt flows and Dense resistant alkali basalt in lava Shallow fracture systems draining in ary(?) and intrusives flows, interbedded tuffs and volcanic springs and seeps. Miocene(?) conglomerates. | Mesa Verde Group Sandstones, shale, and coal. No data col lected. Creta­ Upper Mancos Shale Sandstone and gray to dark gray marine No data collected. ceous shale. Lower Dakota Sandstone or quart: ite; some
Recommended publications
  • Town of Rangely Source Water Protection Plan
    Town of Rangely Source Water Protection Plan Rio Blanco County, Colorado January 2010 Written by Colleen Williams Source Water Specialist Colorado Rural Water Association For the community water provider: Town of Rangely: ID # CO015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………………………………………. 3 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Purpose of a Source Water Protection Plan ………………………… 4 Public Participation in the Planning Process ……………………….. 5 Protection Plan Development ………………………………………………. 6 Steering Committee Members ……………………………………………… 7 WATER SUPPLY SETTING ………………………..……………….………..…………… 8 Location ………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Geology ……..…………………………………….………………………………….. 9 Soils ………..……………………………………………………………………………. 9 Vegetation ……………………………………………………………………………. 9 Climate …………………………………………………………………………………. 10 Land Ownership and Use ……………………………………………………… 11 Population and Growth …………………………………………………………. 13 Economics …………………………………………………………………………….. 14 WATER QUALITY SETTING ……………………………………………………………..… 15 Hydrology ……………………………………………………………………………… 15 Water Quality Standards ……………………………………………………… 17 Water Quality Monitoring …………………………………………………….. 18 Drinking Water Supply Operations ……………………………………….. 23 OVERVIEW OF COLORADO’S SWAP PROGRAM ………………………………… 24 SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT RESULTS …………………………………………. 26 Source Water Assessment Area Delineation ………..…..…………. 26 Contaminant Source Inventory ………………..…………………………… 28 Contaminant Health Concerns ………………………………………………. 29 Susceptibility Analysis ……………………….………………………………….. 30 Potential Contaminant
    [Show full text]
  • User's Manual
    White River Basin Water Resources Planning Model User’s Manual White River - District 43 k Wo e lf C MOFFAT e re r ek ROUTT C UTAH f ol W COLORADO DINOSAUR !O ut40 4 09306290 Y e r l Rive !> l White o 09306224 w !> C r e k e e k RANGELY e Co r al Creek !Ok C 09306222 e s e Rio Blanc o Lake i !> t r Cr er v u i R 9306395 s ite C h a k W !> l 09304500 For g h ort M 09304800MEEKER N U u !> a o !O 09304200 t Skinny Fish Lake !> r e D v !> 09303000 C i S n r h e D 09304000 e h !> e e N k c C o Big Beaver R eservoir Trappers Lake e l k RIO BLANCO e !> u o r u p e e r g r 09306200 G e k C t e l h k F e a C r Wa l l L ak e r h !> 09303500 s e l c E C e a t e E p C c l g a e k a k !> e n e r k s D GARFIELD C a V e e t C e e r e M D r k c e r e i e i r 09303400 C l e k y P l k B r e 09306007 le r C !> u l k k i C r c e !> e e k e r e M e e C r r Picean t k C k ce Cree s e r k e k GARF IELD k C e e e r e e e u r W n k r k h o p s e C l C r e s u w r e S t a o l l t C k a g c il C s u a P a l W o o 139l B w 13 «¬g D ¬ « u t GARFIELD C s o r a e D E GARFIELD e Legend t COLORADO k s e GARFIELD W County !O Cities Highways Rivers Basin Boundary Lakes BOYLE AECOM 03 6 12 18 24 !> Miles Flow Gauges October 2009 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • USGS-Streamgage-Data-Final.Pdf
    Paleoflood Investigations to Improve Peak-Streamflow Regional-Regression Equations for Natural Streamflow in Eastern Colorado, 2015 By Michael S. Kohn, Michael R. Stevens, Tessa M. Harden, Jeanne E. Godaire, Ralph E. Klinger, and Amanullah Mommandi Prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Transportation Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5099 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 6 Table 1. Summary of the streamgages used in the regression analysis of natural streams in eastern Colorado, 2015. Paleoflood InvestigationstoImprovePeak-StreamflowRegional-RegressionEquations,EasternColorado,2015 [USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; CDWR, Colorado Division of Water Resources; NDNR, Nebraska Department of Natural Resources; A, drainage area; mi2, square miles; C, amount of soil consisting of clay in basin; %, percent; Eout, elevation of basin outlet; ft, feet; 6P100, mean basin 6-hour, 100-year precipitation; in., inches; S, mean basin slope; Wyo., Wyoming; Nebr., Nebraska; Colo., Colorado; Kans., Kansas; Okla., Oklahoma; N. Mex., New Mexico; Tex., Texas; NA, not applicable] USGS Latitude Longitude Paleo- USGS CDWR NDNR A C E P S streamgage Streamgage name (decimal (decimal flood out 6 100 peaks peaks peaks (mi2) (%) (ft) (in.) (%) number degrees) degrees) data 06655000 Cottonwood Creek at Wendover, Wyo. 42.3258 –104.8764 24 NA NA No 1,960 17.3 4,450 2.59 13.6 06668040 Rabbit Creek near Wheatland, Wyo. 42.2158 –105.2291 20 NA NA No 1.30 20.6 5,650 2.45 14.9 06675300 Horse Creek Tributary near Little Bear, Wyo. 41.4558 –104.8839 21 NA NA No 8.16 12.2 6,240 2.81 7.78 06687000 Blue Creek near Lewellen, Nebr.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow Statistics in Colorado
    Applied Research and Innovation Branch Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow Statistics in Colorado Joseph P. Capesius and Verlin C. Stephens Report No. CDOT-2009-14 October 2009 The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is(are) responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Colorado Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. CDOT-2009-14 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Regional Regression Equations for Estimation of Natural Streamflow October 2009 Statistics in Colorado 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Joseph P. Capesius and Verlin C. Stephens Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5136 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Colorado Water Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 11. Contract or Grant No. Box 25046, Mail Stop 415 Denver, CO 80225 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Colorado Department of Transportation - Research 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, CO 80222 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey. 16. Abstract The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the Colorado Department of Transportation, developed regional regression equations for estimation of various streamflow statistics that are representative of natural streamflow conditions at ungaged sites in Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Finding of No Significant Impact
    Environmental Assessment Finding of No Significant Impact United States Department of Agriculture Buford New Castle Project Forest Service Rifle and Blanco Ranger Districts February, 2017 White River National Forest Garfield and Rio Blanco Counties Colorado Portions of sections 29 and 32, Township 1S, Range 91W Portions of sections 5, 8, 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 26, 27, 34, 35; Township 2S, Range 91W Portions of sections 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 30, 31; Township 3S, Range 91W Portions of sections 24, 25, 36; Township 3S, Range 92W Portions of sections 6 and 7; Township 4S, Range 91W 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield and Rio Blanco Counties, Colorado For More Information Contact Brett Crary, Silviculturist Rifle Ranger District White River National Forest Service 0094 CR244, Rifle, CO 81650 [email protected] 970-328-5899 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Ccr 1002-37 Regulation No. 37
    COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION 5 CCR 1002-37 REGULATION NO. 37 CLASSIFICATIONS AND NUMERIC STANDARDS FOR LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN APPENDIX 37-1 Stream Classifications and Water Quality Standards Tables Effective 06/30/2020 Abbreviations and Acroynms Aq = Aquatic °C = degrees Celsius CL = cold lake temperature tier CLL = cold large lake temperature tier CS-I = cold stream temperature tier one CS-II = cold stream temperature tier two D.O. = dissolved oxygen DM = daily maximum temperature DUWS = direct use water supply E. coli = Escherichia coli mg/L = milligrams per liter mg/m2 = milligrams per square meter mL = milliliter MWAT = maximum weekly average temperature OW = outstanding waters sc = sculpin SSE = site-specific equation T = total recoverable t = total tr = trout TVS = table value standard µg/L = micrograms per liter UP = use-protected WS = water supply WS-I = warm stream temperature tier one WS-II = warm stream temperature tier two WS-III = warm stream temperature tier three WL = warm lake temperature tier REGULATION #37 STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS and WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Lower Yampa/Green River 1. Deleted. COLCLY01 Classifications Physical and Biological Metals (ug/L) Designation DM MWAT acute chronic Qualifiers: acute chronic Other: Inorganic (mg/L) acute chronic 2. Mainstem of the Yampa River from a point immediately below the confluence with Elkhead Creek to the confluence with the Green River. COLCLY02 Classifications Physical and Biological Metals (ug/L) Designation Agriculture DM MWAT acute chronic Reviewable Aq Life Warm 1 Temperature °C WS-II WS-II Arsenic 340 --- Recreation E acute chronic Arsenic(T) --- 0.02 Water Supply D.O.
    [Show full text]