DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Full Text

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Full Text REINSURING HEALTH REINSURING HEALTH Why More Middle-Class People Are Uninsured and What Government Can Do Katherine Swartz Russell Sage Foundation • New York The Russell Sage Foundation The Russell Sage Foundation, one of the oldest of America’s general purpose foundations, was established in 1907 by Mrs. Margaret Olivia Sage for “the improvement of social and living conditions in the United States.” The Foundation seeks to fulfill this mandate by fostering the development and dissemination of knowledge about the country’s political, social, and economic problems. While the Foundation endeavors to assure the accuracy and objectivity of each book it publishes, the conclusions and interpretations in Russell Sage Foundation publications are those of the authors and not of the Foundation, its Trustees, or its staff. Publication by Russell Sage, therefore, does not imply Foundation endorsement. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Thomas D. Cook, Chair Alan S. Blinder John A. Ferejohn Alan B. Krueger Kenneth D. Brody Larry V. Hedges Cora B. Marrett Christine K. Cassel Jennifer L. Hochschild Eric Wanner Robert E. Denham Kathleen Hall Jamieson Mary C. Waters Christopher Edley Jr. Melvin J. Konner Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Swartz, Katherine. Reinsuring health : why more middle-class people are uninsured and what government can do / Katherine Swartz. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN (cloth) 978-0-87154-787-3 ISBN (paper) 978-0-87154-788-0 1. Insurance, Health—Government policy—United States. 2. Medically uninsured persons—Government policy—United States. I. Title. HG9396.S93 2006 368.38′200973—dc22 2006040505 Copyright © 2006 by Russell Sage Foundation. First paper cover edition 2007. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Reproduction by the United States Government in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48–1992. Text design by Suzanne Nichols. RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION 112 East 64th Street, New York, New York 10021 10987654321 For Frank Contents About the Author ix Preface xi Acknowledgments xiii Chapter 1 A Health Insurance System in Crisis? 1 PART I Why People Lack Health Insurance Chapter 2 The Growing Ranks of the Insured: Who Lacks Health Insurance? 15 Chapter 3 Why Employer-Group Health Insurance Is Cheaper—and Why Those Who Have It Are Lucky 44 Chapter 4 How Health Insurance Markets Work 60 PART II Public Policies to Make Private Insurance More Available Chapter 5 Two Approaches: High-Risk Pools and Assessments to Cover High-Risk People 85 Chapter 6 A Third Approach: The Government as Reinsurer for Small-Group and Individual Markets 101 PART III Getting from Here to There Chapter 7 The Need for a New Health Insurance Structure 125 Appendix Precedents for Government Assuming Responsibility for the Worst Risks 137 Notes 149 References 181 Index 193 About the Author KATHERINE SWARTZ is an economist and professor of health policy and economics at the Harvard School of Public Health. Preface Since the mid-1970s, the federal government has conducted nationally representative surveys of the U.S. population to learn more about those who do not have health insurance. Twenty-five years ago two-thirds of the uninsured lived in poverty or had incomes just above the poverty level, and two-fifths were children. For policymakers determined to re- duce the number of uninsured, the message was clear: expand Medicaid and create programs aimed at children. The country made progress in both of these directions—but to the consternation of many, the number of uninsured continued to rise. As of January 2006, the U.S. had 45.5 million uninsured people. Among these are almost 14 million middle- class people; being uninsured is an increasingly common problem for middle-class adults. The growth in the number of middle-class people among the unin- sured requires us to take a new look at the reasons why people are unin- sured. It also requires that, in addition to programs targeted at the poor and near-poor, we develop new policies to provide incentives for insur- ers to make health insurance more widely available. These are the sub- jects of this book. Acknowledgments As my family and friends know all too well, Reinsuring Health has been a long time coming. I wrote this book with the hope that it would con- tribute to the public’s understanding of why so many Americans are uninsured and what might be done to remedy the situation. I would dearly like to see this great country develop a policy that would guaran- tee health insurance for all Americans. The first version of the book was almost completed while I was on leave and in residence at the Russell Sage Foundation during the 2000– 2001 academic year as a visiting scholar. I am most appreciative of that opportunity and for the generous support of the people at the founda- tion. Eric Wanner deserves special thanks for his support of the project. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation also provided generous financial support, including funding for the initial project that ultimately led to this book. I am grateful to David Colby for his many expressions of encouragement for the writing of the book. The Harvard School of Public Health also provided financial support during the last year when I sub- stantially revised the book. Thanks also go to Arnie Epstein, chair of my department, for encouraging my efforts to address a wider audience than my academic colleagues. While I was writing the first draft of the book, I was fortunate to spend a month at the Rockefeller Foundation Conference and Study Center in Bellagio, Italy, when my husband was a fellow in residence there. I wrote more in that one month than I have ever been able to write anywhere else, and I thank the people there for that. I owe enormous debts to the many people who read all or parts of the working drafts of the book. They were generous in giving their time, and their constructive comments, questions, and suggestions greatly im- proved the book. Joe Newhouse read both of the working drafts and provided insightful comments and suggestions. I appreciated his con- stant reminders to be precise, even when trying to simplify explanations. My father, Clifford Swartz, also read both working drafts. He also asked good questions that made me rework explanations. I am not sure whether both are gluttons for punishment, but I am enormously grateful to them for the detailed comments and suggestions they made. Linda Blumberg, Judy Feder, Deborah Garnick, Alan Monheit, and Steve Zuckerman all provided extremely thoughtful and detailed com- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ments on the first working draft. I hope they will see where their atten- tion to details and suggestions for reorganizing the book’s themes re- shaped the book. Each deserves special thanks. I also am grateful to Bruce Abbe of Communicating for Agriculture for his many comments and suggestions relating to chapter 5 and state high-risk pools. His com- ments made me rethink and rework my discussion of these pools. Ed Pasterick of the Federal Emergency Management Agency also provided details and comments that greatly improved my understanding of the federal government’s role in flood insurance (see the appendix). Janet Rosenbaum, a student in the Harvard Ph.D. program in health policy, gave me very useful feedback on four of the chapters of the first working draft. Particularly helpful were my discussions with Karen Pollitz about the differences between the uninsured people I interviewed and those she has written about who lack health coverage. Finally, two anonymous reviewers provided very useful comments and suggestions for ways to improve the book, and I am grateful to them. Despite their extensive input, all these people may not agree with everything I say, and they certainly are not to blame for errors that may remain. I do not want to name the uninsured people I spoke with, but I am very grateful for their willingness to spend time talking candidly about their circumstances and experiences. I only hope that this book helps get them health insurance soon. Other people talked with me about reinsur- ance and those industries and parts of the economy where there has been a marked increase in the use of nonpermanent employees. I am grateful especially to Ari Wolfe, Meghan McGuire, Lee Koromvokis, Steve Gunther, Steve Barley, Michael Hartman, Harry Shuford, Barbara Helfgott Hyett, Elise Peterson, Susan Houseman, Paul Osterman, Thomas Kochan, Oscar Reyes, Frank Ellero, Franklin Shaffer, Peter Buer- haus, Susan Garfield, Tamara Swartz, Beth Cooper Lawrence, Nanci Healy, Susan Walker, Cathy Perron, Nick Lemann, Jaci Coleman, An- drew Cooper, Nancy Hallberg, Deborah Jackson Weiss, and Judith Mol- dover. I am indebted to a number of friends and colleagues who provided me with information or explanations that were otherwise hard to find; Laurie Pascal, Julian Pettingil, Patricia Swolak, Randy Ellis, Michelle Mello, and David Autor were particularly generous in this regard. Jim Mayhew of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Jim Rice of the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages were more than generous in helping me find data I could not find myself in libraries or on the Web, in some cases because it is now considered “old.” I could not have described the uninsured and the changes in their characteristics over the last twenty-five years without the help of three xiv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS outstanding graduate students in economics at MIT: Cynthia Perry, Eliz- abeth Oltman Ananat, and Jessica Cohen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Applying Wage Insurance to the 1099 Economy, Applies Economy, to the 1099 Insurance Wage Applying Section, Fourth The
    FRESH PERSPECTIVE SERIES Wage insurance in an era of non-traditional work By Susan R. Holmberg and Felicia Wong, The Roosevelt Institute THE FUTURE OF WORK INITIATIVE is a nonpartisan effort to identify concrete ways to strengthen the social contract in the midst of sweeping changes in the workplace and workforce. The Initiative is focused on two key objectives: first, to advance and protect the economic interests of Americans in the independent workforce, including those in the rapidly growing on-demand economy; and second, to inspire a 21st-century capital- ism which rewards work, fuels innovation, and promises a brighter future for business- es and workers alike. The Initiative is driven by the leadership of Honorary Co-Chairs WAGE INSURANCE IN AN ERA OF NON-TRADITIONAL WORK NON-TRADITIONAL OF ERA AN IN INSURANCE WAGE Senator Mark Warner and Purdue University President Mitch Daniels with Co-Chairs John Bridgeland and Bruce Reed. For more information visit as.pn/futureofwork. The Future of Work Initiative is made possible through the generous philanthropic support of a broad range of foundations, individuals, and corporate partners, including: Emanu- el J. Friedman Philanthropies, The Hitachi Foundation, The Ford Foundation, The Kresge Foundation, The Markle Foundation, The Peter G. Peterson Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, The Rockefeller Foundation, Brian Sheth, Sean Parker, Apple, BlackRock, and others. Copyright © 2016 by the Aspen Institute PAGE 1 PAGE ABOUT THE FRESH PERSPECTIVE SERIES THE FRESH PERSPECTIVE SERIES is a collection of independent works from expert authors across the ideological spectrum, each presenting new ideas for how various aspects of the social safety net could be updated to better meet the needs of our 21st century workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits While on Leave
    Benefits at a Glance If payment is not received Benefit Billing by due date Health Insurance Billed on 1st pay day of each month to home address for next month's coverage. Payment is due 2 weeks from date Cancellation of bill. Life Insurance Billed on 1st pay day of each month to home address for current month's coverage. Payment is due 2 weeks from Cancellation date of bill. Dental Insurance Billed on 2nd pay day of each month to home address for next month's coverage. Payment is due 2 weeks from date Cancellation of bill. Flexible Spending No Bill. Lump sum deduction of missed contributions is Employee must contact HR or (Health and/or Dependent) taken upon return to work or from any available pay. City Payroll if not returning to work within calendar year Income Continuation No billing while collecting benefit. No coverage if leave is (Wage Insurance) not medical. N/A Benefits in Detail Health Insurance: You will receive a monthly bill sent to your home address from Central Payroll. You will be billed the employee portion while on a qualified medical leave. If your leave of absence is not medically related, you may be responsible for the entire premium. Premiums are due two weeks from the date of the bill for the following month’s coverage. Bills are usually sent out on the first pay date of each month. Please contact HR at 608-266-4615 or Coleen (Central Payroll) at 608-266-9090 with any questions or if you do not intend to retain coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Wage Insurance for the Working Poor
    PPB No.28 2/17/99 4:32 PM Page a1 The Jerome Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Public Policy Brief Making Work Pay Wage Insurance for the Working Poor Barry Bluestone and Teresa Ghilarducci No. 28/1996 PPB No.28 2/17/99 4:32 PM Page 2 The Jerome Levy Economics Institute of Bard Co l l e g e , founded in 1986, is an autonomous, inde- pendently endowed re s e a rch organization. It is n o n p a rtisan, open to the examination of diverse points of view, and dedicated to public servi c e . The Jerome Levy Economics Institute is publish - ing this proposal with the conviction that it rep r e - sents a constructive and positive contribution to the discussions and debates on the relevant policy issues. Neither the Institute’s Board of Governo r s nor its Advisory Board necessarily endorses the pr oposal in this issue. The Levy Institute believes in the potential for the study of economics to improve the human condi- tion. Through scholarship and economic forecast- ing it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. The present res e a r ch agenda includes such issues as financial instability, povert y, employment, pro b- lems associated with the distribution of income and wealth, and international trade and competitive- ness. In all its endeavors, the Levy Institute places heavy emphasis on the values of personal free d o m and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Insurance: Connecting Theory to Data
    CHAPTER 3 Social Insurance: Connecting Theory to Data Raj Chetty*,† and Amy Finkelstein†,‡ *Harvard University †NBER ‡MIT Contents 1. Introduction 112 2. Motivations for Social Insurance 114 2.1. Adverse Selection: Review of the Basic Theory 115 2.1.1. A Stylized Model 116 2.1.2. The Textbook Case 118 2.1.3. Departures from the Textbook Environment: Loads and Preference Heterogeneity 123 2.2. Empirical Evidence on Selection 127 2.2.1. Testing for Selection 128 2.2.2. Evidence on Selection 131 2.2.3. Welfare Consequences 134 2.2.4. Directions for Future Work 139 2.3. Other Motivations 140 3. Design of Public Insurance Programs 143 3.1. Optimal Benefit Level in a Static Model 145 3.2. Sufficient Statistics Implementation 148 3.2.1. Consumption Smoothing 148 3.2.2. Liquidity vs. Moral Hazard 157 3.2.3. Reservation Wages 159 3.3. Generalizing the Static Model 163 3.3.1. Dynamics: Endogenous Savings and Borrowing Constraints 163 3.3.2. Externalities on Private Insurers 168 3.3.3. Externalities on Government Budgets 170 3.3.4. Other Externalities 172 3.3.5. Imperfect Optimization 174 3.4. Other Dimensions of Policy 176 3.4.1. Liquidity Provision and Mandated Savings Accounts 176 3.4.2. Imperfect Takeup 178 3.4.3. Path of Benefits 180 4. Challenges for Future Work 182 Acknowledgments 186 References 186 Handbook of Public Economics, Volume 5 © 2013 Elsevier B.V. ISSN 1573-4420, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00003-0 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefit Plans Overview
    BENEFIT PLANS OVERVIEW Benefit Plan Overview (Effective thru 12/31/2011) Page 1 Table of Contents Contact Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Enrollment .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Eligibility ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Medical Benefits* ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Continuation of Group Coverage after Qualifying Event (COBRA) ................................................................. 8 Vision Benefits ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Dental Benefits .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Life Insurance and Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) Insurance Benefits* ............................. 11 Long Term Disability Insurance (LTD)* ........................................................................................................ 13 University Disability Benefits ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Unemployment Insurance? a More Modest Approach in the Short Term, More Ambition in the Long Term
    No. 20 / May 2019 European Unemployment Insurance? A more modest approach in the short term, more ambition in the long term Günther Schmid © European Social Observatory European Unemployment Insurance? A more modest approach in the short term, more ambition in the long term Günther Schmid (1) The ‘OSE Paper Series’ takes the form of three different publications available in English or French. The ‘Research Papers’ are intended to disseminate results of research by the OSE, associated researchers or colleagues from the OSE network. The ‘Briefing Papers’ contain readily accessible and regular information on a variety of topics. The ‘Opinion Papers’ consist of concise policy-oriented opinions. ISSN 1994-2893 1. Günther Schmid is a retired Professor of Political Economy at the Free University of Berlin and Director Emeritus at WZB Berlin Social Science Centre. Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; homepage: www.guentherschmid.eu OSE Opinion Paper No. 20 – May 2019 2 © European Social Observatory Table of contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 1. State of the debate on European unemployment insurance ................................................. 7 2. Towards a system of European employment insurance ...................................................... 13 3. Features of the
    [Show full text]
  • Nionism Benefits D.C. Bank and Its Employees
    Employees AAR IITEOffice and Professional COLInternational Union, AFL-CIO and CLC No. 384 FEBRUARY 1979 (1*- 3 nionism Benefits D.C. Bank and Its Employees Customer Deposits, Net Profits and Staff Pay Soar at The National Bank of Washington By JANE PEDEN arbitration machinery to settle any disputes that may This remarkable but solid growth has been due to arise between management and employees. Strange the joint efforts of enterprising and innovative bank When bank employees unionize they not only bene- as it may seem, grievances are now few and far be- management, together with the loyal cooperation of fit themselves but also stimulate management innova- tween, amounting to less than 10 a year, all being our unit members who act as personal sales people in tive skills when they both work together in an at- resolved fairly in a mutual spirit of "give and take." attracting more deposits to their bank. mosphere of mutual respect and harmony. Technological changes have been numerous also Needless to say, from time to time we run into some As an example, I can cite my own experience in since we unionized but they, too, surprisingly have jittery employees who see doom in some new innova- The Washington where I work in National Bank of created new opportunities for career advancement by tion in bank services or a rumor floats about. But the Review In my capacity as unit Loan Department. the employees. Our contract calls for retraining in when the union informs its membership that it cannot & Employees Chief Steward of the Office Professional event of automation, and this solution has proved inhibit management's ability to offer cost-competitive Union, Local 2, our bargaining repre- International mutually beneficial for both the bank and its em- services with other banks, its assurance is met with a I have had a unique opportunity to observe sentative, ployees.
    [Show full text]
  • Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance and Worker Productivity
    ZHENG, MAOZHAO, Ph.D., Employer-sponsored Health Insurance and Worker Productivity. (2017) Directed by Dr. Ken Snowden and Dr. Martin Andersen. 191 pp. Health insurance for the working population of the United States is largely provided through employers primarily because of favorable income tax treatments and employment laws that encourage employers, large or small, to provide health insurance to their employees. In fact, a recent survey shows that employer-sponsored insurance covers over 50% of the non-elderly population of the United States, 57% of firms offered health benefits to employees, and 63% of workers accepted the coverage. This dissertation addresses several interesting questions raised by this situation. First, why do some firms offer health insurance to their employees whereas others do not? Second, what determines the number of health insurance plans offered among employers who do offer health insurance? Third, how do employers’ decisions concerning how many health insurance plans to offer influence the take-up decisions by employees and, therefore, variations in the extent and quality of health insurance coverage across industries and occupations? To provide at least a partial answer to these questions, this dissertation hypothesizes that employer-sponsored health insurance may affect worker productivity and, as a result, the different types of health insurance policies offered by employers and taken up by their workers. It then empirically investigates whether and how it does so. The first part of the dissertation addresses this issue from a theoretical perspective by investigating how employers decide the types and costs of the health insurance plans they offer, and their workers decisions whether to take up those plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Plan Summary Plan Description
    AMERICAN MARITIME OFFICERS MEDICAL PLAN Summary Plan Description January 1, 2018 AMERICAN MARITIME OFFICERS PLANS MEDICAL – PENSION – MONEY PURCHASE BENEFIT – VACATION – SAFETY & EDUCATION – 401(K) 2 West Dixie Highway, Dania Beach, FL 33004 – 4312 Telephone: (954) 920-4247 or (800) 348-6515 www.amoplans.com Dear Plan Participant: We are pleased to provide you with this Summary Plan Description (“SPD”) booklet that explains the benefits of your American Maritime Officers Medical Plan (the “Plan”) as in effect January 1, 2018. Please note that the SPD is broken down into four parts: Part 1 - Medical Benefits/Eligibility - explains your medical benefits that are processed through American Benefit Corporation, the Plan’s third party administrator utilizing the PPO Network of Blue Cross Blue Shield . Part 2 - Addendum - covers direct member reimbursed benefits that are administered and paid by the Plan office. These benefits consist of optical, dental, death, dismemberment, scholarship, and wage insurance. Part 3 - EnvisionRx Options - relates to pharmaceutical benefits for Active participants and Pensioners not eligible for Medicare. Part 4 - EnvisionRx Plus - relates to pharmaceutical benefits for Pensioners eligible for Medicare. The SPD explains the Plan in effect as of January 1, 2018. If the determination of a particular benefit must be considered prior to January 1, 2018, the provisions of the Plan in effect at the relevant date must be applied. Those provisions may be different from the current Plan as contained in this SPD. You can call, fax, write, or email the Plan office for answers to any questions you may have about the Plan and how any rule affects you and/or your eligible dependents.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Restructuring of Unemployment Insurance: Wage-Loss Insurance and Temporary Earnings Replacement Accounts
    THE Advancing Opportunity, HAMILTON Prosperity and Growth PROJECT DISCUSSION PAPER 2006-05 SEPTEMBER 2006 Jeffrey R. Kling Fundamental Restructuring of Unemployment Insurance: Wage-Loss Insurance and Temporary Earnings Replacement Accounts The Brookings Institution The Hamilton Project seeks to advance America’s promise of opportunity, prosperity, and growth. The Project’s economic strategy reflects a judgment that long-term prosperity is best achieved by making economic growth broad-based, by enhancing individual economic security, and by embracing a role for effective government in making needed public investments. Our strategy—strikingly different from the theories driving current economic policy—calls for fiscal discipline and for increased public investment in key growth- enhancing areas. The Project will put forward innovative policy ideas from leading economic thinkers throughout the United States—ideas based on experience and evidence, not ideology and doctrine—to introduce new, sometimes controversial, policy options into the national debate with the goal of improving our country’s economic policy. The Project is named after Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first treasury secretary, who laid the foundation for the modern American economy. Consistent with the guiding principles of the Project, Hamilton stood for sound fiscal policy, believed that broad-based opportunity for advancement would drive American economic growth, and recognized that “prudent aids and encouragements on the part of government” are necessary to enhance and guide market forces. THE Advancing Opportunity, HAMILTON Prosperity and Growth PROJECT THE HAMILTON PROJECT Fundamental Restructuring of Unemployment Insurance Wage-Loss Insurance and Temporary Earnings Replacement Accounts Jeffrey R. Kling This discussion paper is a proposal from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Treatment of Employee Pension and Wage
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Marquette University Law School Marquette University Law School Marquette Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2014 An Analysis of the Treatment of Employee Pension and Wage Claims in Insolvency and Under Guarantee Schemes in OECD Countries: Comparative Law Lessons for Detroit and the United States Paul M. Secunda Marquette University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/facpub Part of the Law Commons Publication Information Paul M. Secunda, An Analysis of the Treatment of Employee Pension and Wage Claims in Insolvency and Under Guarantee Schemes in OECD Countries: Comparative Law Lessons for Detroit and the United States, 41 Fordham Urb. L.J. 867 (2014) Repository Citation Secunda, Paul M., "An Analysis of the Treatment of Employee Pension and Wage Claims in Insolvency and Under Guarantee Schemes in OECD Countries: Comparative Law Lessons for Detroit and the United States" (2014). Faculty Publications. Paper 651. http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/facpub/651 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ANALYSIS OF THE TREATMENT OF EMPLOYEE PENSION AND WAGE CLAIMS IN INSOLVENCY AND UNDER GUARANTEE SCHEMES IN OECD COUNTRIES: COMPARATIVE LAW LESSONS FOR DETROIT AND THE UNITED STATES Paul M. Secunda* Introduction ............................................................................................. 869 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Jobs for the Heartland: Place-Based Policies in 21St-Century America
    BENJAMIN AUSTIN Harvard University EDWARD GLAESER Harvard University LAWRENCE SUMMERS Harvard University Jobs for the Heartland: Place-Based Policies in 21st-Century America ABSTRACT The economic convergence of U.S. regions has slowed greatly, and rates of long-term nonemployment have even been diverging. Simultane- ously, the rate of nonemployment for working age men has nearly tripled over the last 50 years, generating a social problem that is disproportionately centered in the eastern parts of the American heartland. Should more permanent eco- nomic divisions across space lead U.S. economists to rethink their traditional skepticism about place-based policies? We document that increases in labor demand appear to have greater effects on employment in areas where not work- ing has been historically high, suggesting that subsidizing employment in such places could reduce the rate of not working. Proemployment policies, such as a ramped-up Earned Income Tax Credit, that are targeted toward regions with more elastic employment responses, however financed, could plausibly reduce suffering and materially improve economic performance. o America’s profound spatial economic disparities require spatially Dtargeted policies? Traditionally, economists have been skeptical about these policies because of a conviction that relief is best targeted toward poor people rather than poor places, because incomes in poor areas were Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The authors received financial support for this work from the Smith Richardson Foundation. With the exception of the aforementioned, they did not receive financial support from any firm or person for this paper or from any firm or person with a financial or political interest in this paper.
    [Show full text]