DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado Tribal Contacts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Colorado Tribal Contacts COLORADO TRI BAL CONTACTS January 14, 2019 The "Colorado Tribal Contacts List" has been developed with assistance from the National Park Service NAGPRA Grants program, and is produced through an interagency partnership between the Colorado Commission of Indian Affairs and History Colorado. The directory is designed for cultural resource managers and others wishing to contact tribes with a legacy of occupation in Colorado. Per executive memorandum “Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments” (59 FR 22951), federal agencies are required to consult with Indian nations on a government-to-government basis. Accordingly, the names and addresses of tribal leaders and, if provided, NAGPRA Representatives and Tribal Historic Preservation Officers are listed below as conveyed by tribal headquarters. As always, those using this list are advised to confirm each tribe's consultation protocol and contact information for each project. Please report corrections and modifications to (303) 866-4531. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Phone: 605-964-4155 Fax: 605-964-4151 Chairman Bobby Komardley Email: [email protected] Apache Tribe of Oklahoma P.O. Box 1330 Steve Vance Anadarko, OK 73005 THPO Phone: 405-247-9493 Fax: 405-247-2942 Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Email: [email protected] Cultural Preservation Office P.O. Box 590 98 S. Willow St. The Chairman is the NAGPRA contact. Eagle Butte, SD 57625-0590 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Phone: 605-964-7554 Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma [email protected] Governor Reggie Wassana ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Cheyenne & Arapaho Business Committee Comanche Nation, Oklahoma Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma Chairman William Nelson P.O. Box 38 Comanche Nation Concho, OK 73022 P.O. Box 908 Phone: 405-422-7720 Fax: 405-422-7417 Lawton, OK 73502 Email: [email protected] Phone: 580-492-3240 Fax: 580-492-3796 Email: [email protected] Max Bear, THPO Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma Margaret Murrow 200 Wolf Robe Circle NAGPRA Director P.O. Box 145 #10 SW D Avenue Concho, OK 73022 Lawton, OK 73502 Phone: 405-422-7714 Fax: 405-422-8267 Phone: 580-595-9350 Fax: 580-595-9733 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Arapaho representative for NAGPRA Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Federico (Fred) Mosqueda, Sr. Chairman Lester Thompson Jr. Arapaho Coordinator Crow Creek Sioux Tribe P.O. Box 145 P.O. Box 50 Concho, OK 73022 Fort Thompson, SD 57339 Phone: (o) 580-623-7325 (c) 405-687-1023 Phone: 605-245-2221 Fax: 605-245-2470 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Cheyenne representative for NAGPRA Merle Marks Chester Whiteman THPO Language and Culture Crow Creek Sioux Tribe PO Box 145 P.O. Box 50 Concho, OK 73022 Fort Thompson, SD 57339 Phone: (o) 405-422-7522 (c) 405-693-4822 Phone: (o) 605-245-2221 Fax: 605-245-2470 Fax: 405-422-8267 (c) 605-680-4966 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] [email protected] ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Crow Tribe Eugene Blackbear Chairman Alvin Not Afraid, Jr. ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Crow Tribe Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe P.O. Box 159 Chairman Harold Frazier Crow Agency, MT 59022 Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Phone: 406-679-1974 P.O. Box 590 Email: N/A Eagle Butte, SD 57625 Crow Tribe, continued 1 William Big Day President Levi Pesata THPO Jicarilla Apache Tribal Council Crow Tribe P.O. Box 507 P.O. Box 159 Dulce, NM 87528 Crow Agency, MT 59022 Phone: 575-759-3242 Fax: 575-759-3005 Phone: (c) 406-638-1010 Email: c/o Administrative Assistant: Email: [email protected] ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Eastern Shoshone Tribe (Wind River Reservation) Dr. Jeffrey Blythe Chairman Vernon Hill THPO, Office of Cultural Affairs Shoshone Business Council Jicarilla Apache Nation Shoshone Tribe P.O. Box 1367 P.O.Box 538 Dulce, NM 87528 Fort Washakie, WY 82514 Phone: 575-759-1343 Fax: 575-759-1342 Phone: 307-332-3532 Fax: 307-332-3055 Alternative Phone: 575-756-0062 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Joshua Mann Kewa Pueblo (formerly the Pueblo of Santo Domingo) THPO Governor Joe M. Aquilar P.O. Box 538 Kewa Pueblo Fort Washakie, WY 82514 P.O. Box 99 Phone: (o) 307-335-2081 Fax: 307-332-3055 Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM 87052 Email: [email protected] Phone: 505-465-2214 Fax: 505-465-2688 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Email: [email protected] Fort Sill Apache Tribe Chairman Jeff Haozous Position Vacant Fort Sill Apache Business Committee NAGPRA Contact Fort Sill Apache Tribe Kewa Pueblo Rt. 2, Box 121 P.O. Box 99 Apache, OK 73006 Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM 87052 Phone: 580-588-2298 Fax: 580-588-3133 Phone: 505-465-2214 Fax: 505-465-2688 Email: [email protected] Email: ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Leland Michael Darrow Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma Tribal Historian Chairman Mathew Komalty Fort Sill Apache Tribe Kiowa Business Committee 43187 US Hwy 281 Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma Apache, OK 73006 P.O. Box 369 Phone: 580-588-2298 Fax: 580-588-3133 Carnegie, OK 73015 Email: [email protected] Phone: 580-654-2300 Fax: 580-654-8714 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Email: [email protected] The Hopi Tribe Chairman Timothy L. Nuvangyaoma Kellie J. Lewis The Hopi Tribe THPO P.O. Box 123 P.O. Box 50 Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039 Carnegie, OK 73105 Phone: 928-734-3102 Fax: 928-734-6665 Phone: (405) 203-2874 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Stewart Koyiyumptewa Ivy Smith Director, Hopi Cultural Preservation Office Assistant THPO P.O. Box 123 P.O. Box 50 Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039 Carnegie, OK 73105 Phone: 928-734-3611 Fax: 928-734-3629 Phone: (405) 203-2874 Fax: n/a Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Lee Wayne Lomayestewa Mescalero Apache Tribe Research Assistant President Arthur Blazer Hopi Cultural Preservation Office Mescalero Apache Tribe P.O. Box 123 P.O. Box 227 Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039 Mescalero, NM 88340 Phone: 928-734-3613 Fax: 928-734-3629 Phone: 575-464-4494 Fax: 575-464-9191 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Jicarilla Apache Nation Mescalero Apache Tribe, continued 2 Holly Houghten Oglala Sioux Tribe, continued THPO Temporary Contact: Michael Catches Enemy P.O. Box 227 Cultural Liaison Mescalero, NM 88340 Oglala Sioux Tribe Phone: 575-464-3005 Fax: 575-464-3005 P.O. Box 2070 Email: [email protected] Pine Ridge, SD 57770 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Phone: (o) 605-867-2098 Fax: n/a Navajo Nation Email: [email protected] President Jonathan Nez ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Navajo Nation Ohkay Owingeh (Pueblo of San Juan) P.O. Box 7440 Governor Ron Lovato Window Rock, AZ 86515 Ohkay Owingeh Phone: 928-871-7000 Fax: 928-871-4025 P.O. Box 1099 Email: [email protected] San Juan, NM 87566 Phone: 505-852-4400 Fax: 505-852-4820 Richard M. Begay Email: [email protected] Department Manager III P.O. Box 4950 Michael Montoya Window Rock, AZ 86515 Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Phone: 928-871-7198 Fax: 928-871-7886 P.O. Box 1532 Email: [email protected] San Juan, NM 87566 Phone: (o) 505-852-4400 x 227 Fax: n/a Timothy Begay (c) 501-927-0731 Navajo Cultural Specialist Email: [email protected] Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department P.O. Box 4950 Larry Phillips Window Rock, AZ 86515 Natural Resources Director Phone: 928-871-7198 Fax: 928-871-7886 P.O. Box 1532 Email: [email protected] San Juan, NM ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Phone: 505-852-4211 Fax: n/a Northern Arapaho Tribe Email: [email protected] Chairman Lee Spoonhunter ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Northern Arapaho Business Council Osage Nation P.O. Box 396 Principal Chief Geoffrey Standingbear Fort Washakie, WY 82514 Osage Nation Phone: 307-332-6120 Fax: 307-332-7543 P.O. Box 779 or 627 Grandview Avenue Email: [email protected] Pawhuska, OK 74056 Phone: 918-287-5555 Fax: 918-287-5562 Devon Oldman Email: [email protected] NATHPO, Director P.O. Box 396, Fort Washakie, WY 82514 Dr. Andrea Hunter Phone: 307-438-5318 Fax: 307-332-7543 THPO Email: [email protected] Osage Nation ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ 627 Grandview Avenue Northern Cheyenne Tribe Pawhuska, OK 74056 President Rynalea Whiteman Pena Phone: 918-287-5328 Fax: 918-287-5376 Northern Cheyenne Tribal Council Email: [email protected] P.O. Box 128 Interested in: Baca, Bent, Kiowa & Prowers Counties Lame Deer, MT 59043 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Phone: 406-477-6284 Fax: 406-477-6210 Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Email: [email protected] Chairwoman Tamara Borchardt Slayton Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Teanna Limpy, Director 440 North Paiute Dr. THPO Cedar City, UT 84721 P.O. Box 128 Phone: 435-586-1112 Fax: 435-586-7388 Lame Deer, MT 59043 Email: [email protected] Phone: 406-477-4839/4838 Fax: 406-477-6210 Email: [email protected] Dorena Martineau ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Cultural Resource Director Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Oglala Sioux Tribe 440 North Paiute Dr. President Julian Bear Runner Cedar City, UT 84721 Oglala Sioux Tribal Council Phone: 435-586-1112 x 107 Fax: 435-586-7388 P.O. Box 2070 Email: [email protected] Pine Ridge, SD 57770 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Phone: 605-867-8420 Fax: 605-867-6076 Email: Executive Secretary Joni Morrisette [email protected] Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma 3 President Bruce Pratt Pueblo of Jemez Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma Governor David M. Toledo 881 Little Dee Drive Pueblo of Jemez Pawnee, OK 74058 P.O. Box 100 Phone: 918-762-3621 Fax: 918-762-6446 Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 Email: Asst: [email protected] Phone: 575-834-7359 Fax: 575-834-7331 Email: Assistant Lynn Toledo [email protected] Matt Reed Repatriation Committee Mr. Christopher Toya Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma THPO P.O. Box 470 Pueblo of Jemez Pawnee, OK 74058 P.O. Box 100 Phone: 918-762-2180 Jemez Pueblo, NM 87024 Phone: (o) 575-834-7696 x 104 Fax: 575-834-7697 Email: [email protected] (c) 505-269-0927 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Email: [email protected] Pueblo of Acoma ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Governor Brian Vallo Pueblo of Laguna Pueblo of Acoma Governor Wilford Herrera Jr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot
    Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Archeological Studies Branch, Cultural Resources Management (CRM) Section, Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) Vision for Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT The Texas Department of Transportation is a best-in-class agency that goes above and beyond the spirit of consultation to work collaboratively with federally recognized Native American tribes toward mutually beneficial outcomes during all levels of the transportation process. Mission of the Tribal Relations and Consultation Program: Build relationships and purposefully collaborate with tribal nations in the planning and implementation of TxDOT projects and programs. In working with tribal nations, TxDOT: . Recognizes the inherent sovereign status and reserved rights of tribes; . Practices and promotes cultural sensitivity when working with tribes; . Honors the spirit of various federal requirements and orders to consult with tribes; . Aims to go above and beyond current practices to foster trust and productivity; . Commits to providing meaningful and substantive consultation with tribes on transportation projects; and . Promotes collaborative consultation opportunities during planning and review processes within TXDOT. 2 Draft Tribal Relations and Consultation Strategic Plan 2016 Foreword Texas’ long and rich cultural history is rooted in the indigenous people who once inhabited the land. Tribal nations continue to have an inherent interest in the state’s natural and cultural resources. Today, the federal government recognizes tribes’ inherent sovereign status, a unique relationship that is embodied in the U.S. Constitution, treaties, court decisions, federal statutes and executive orders. As TxDOT builds a safe and reliable transportation system, the agency (on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration) consults with tribes on statewide transportation plans and projects with federal funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Indian Warfare
    Native American Indian warfare 1840 – 1895 1. Raids / reasons for raids 2. Time of year for fighting & reasons 3. Changes to reasons for fighting later in the period / attitude to land 4. Why individuals fought 5. Scalping 6. Counting coup 7. Weapons 8. Signs & symbols of warfare 9. Value of horses How Warlike were the Sioux? Native Americans fought other tribes to gain horses (a sign of wealth) and to gain a wife (through impressing the girls with their success and reputation). Women and children would be captured War was about gaining and expected to contribute to their new tribe. glory, feathers and scalps were symbols of Linked closely to their spiritual a warrior’s beliefs e.g. body painting, Conclusions achievements. thought the spirits would Scalping your enemy about their protect them. Eagle feathers meant he would not culture are a marker of success in be there in the afterlife battle. to fight you again. Warfare was about showing bravery not killing your enemy e.g. getting so close to him and running away (not dying as you were needed by your family to hunt, etc) – ultimate act of bravery. Although when the Indians fought the U.S cavalry, the American soldiers saw this as cowardly behaviour. How Warlike were the Sioux? 1. What is a raiding party? 2. How often did the Sioux carry out raids? 3. What were the main reasons why the Sioux carried out raids? 4. Why did the Sioux only carry out raids in the summer? 5. How did the Sioux way of fighting change once the settlers arrived? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, Transmitting an Agreement with the Jiearilla Apache and Certain Ute Indians in the Territory of New Mexico
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 2-3-1874 Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, transmitting an agreement with the Jiearilla Apache and certain Ute Indians in the Territory of New Mexico. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Exec. Doc. No. 130, 43d Cong., 1st Sess. (1874) This House Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 43n CoNGRESS, } IIOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. { Ex. Doc. ---lst Session. -= ____ -~ o. ~30. ~ JIOARILLA APACHE AND UTE INDIANS OF ~EW MEXICO. LETTER FF.OM 'THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, TRANSMITTING An agreement 'With tlte Jicarilla Apache and certain Ute Indians in tlte . 'Territory of New Mexico. FEnRUAHY 5, 1874.-Referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. FEBRUARY 13, 1874.-0rdered to be printed. DEPAR1'1\1:EN1' OP THE INTERIOR, Wa.shington, D. 0., Februa1•y 0, 1874. SIR: I have the honor to present herewith, for the action of Congress, :an agreement concluded on the lOth of December, 1873, with the Jica­ rilla Apache and certain Ute Indians in the Territory of New Mexico, which provides for their location upon a reservation therein described, and for their relinquishment of all other lands heretofore claimed by them.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Settlers on the Osage Diminished Reserve: a Study Of
    KANSAS SETTLERS ON THE OSAGE DIMINISHED RESERVE 168 KANSAS HISTORY A Study of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House on the Prairie by Penny T. Linsenmayer aura Ingalls Wilder’s widely acclaimed “Little the Sturges Treaty in the context of public land policy. Each House” series of children’s novels traces her life side committed acts of violence and property destruction with her parents and sisters from the late 1860s against the other, but historical evidence supports the until her marriage to Almanzo Wilder in 1885. proposition that the majority of both Osages and settlers LThe primary focus of Wilder’s third novel, Little House on favored and actively promoted peaceful relations. Howev- the Prairie, was the interaction between the pioneer settlers er, the overall relationship between the parties was marked of Kansas and the Osage Indians. Wilder’s family settled in by an unavoidable degree of tension. The settlers who pro- Montgomery County, Kansas, in 1869–1870, approximate- moted peaceful relations desired that the land be opened ly one year before the final removal of the Osages to Indi- up to them for settlement, and even the Osages who fa- an Territory. The novel depicts some of the pivotal events vored a speedy removal to Indian Territory merely tolerat- in the relations between the Osages and the intruding set- ed the intruders. tlers during that time period.1 The Ingalls family arrived in Kansas with a large tide The Osages ceded much of their Great Plains territory of other squatters in the summer and fall of 1869, a point at to the United States in the first half of the nineteenth cen- which relations between settlers and Osages were most tury and finally were left in 1865 with one remaining tract strained.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands of the Lakota: Policy, Culture and Land Use on the Pine Ridge
    1 Lands of the Lakota: Policy, Culture and Land Use on the Pine Ridge Reservation Joseph Stromberg Senior Honors Thesis Environmental Studies and Anthropology Washington University in St. Louis 2 Abstract Land is invested with tremendous historical and cultural significance for the Oglala Lakota Nation of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Widespread alienation from direct land use among tribal members also makes land a key element in exploring the roots of present-day problems—over two thirds of the reservation’s agricultural income goes to non-Natives, while the majority of households live below the poverty line. In order to understand how current patterns in land use are linked with federal policy and tribal culture, this study draws on three sources: (1) archival research on tribal history, especially in terms of territory loss, political transformation, ethnic division, economic coercion, and land use; (2) an account of contemporary problems on the reservation, with an analysis of current land policy and use pattern; and (3) primary qualitative ethnographic research conducted on the reservation with tribal members. Findings indicate that federal land policies act to effectively block direct land use. Tribal members have responded to policy in ways relative to the expression of cultural values, and the intent of policy has been undermined by a failure to fully understand the cultural context of the reservation. The discussion interprets land use through the themes of policy obstacles, forced incorporation into the world-system, and resistance via cultural sovereignty over land use decisions. Acknowledgements I would like to sincerely thank the Buder Center for American Indian Studies of the George Warren Brown School of Social Work as well as the Environmental Studies Program, for support in conducting research.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance
    Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Information Sources and Gaps.................................................................................................................. 2 Existing Forest Plan Direction for Tribal Resources ................................................................................ 3 Scale of Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 3 Intertribal and Interagency Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Memorandum of Understanding ................................................................................................................................... 4 Existing Tribal Rights ............................................................................................................................... 4 Previous Treaties with Ute Bands ......................................................................................................... 4 Hunting Rights: The Brunot Treaty ...................................................................................................... 5 Spiritual Rights ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical
    Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical Ethnography ______________________________________________________ 3.1 Introduction The Arapaho believe they were the first people created on earth. The Arapaho called themselves, the Hinanae'inan, "Our Own Kind of People.”1 After their creation, Arapaho tradition places them at the earth's center. The belief in the centrality of their location is no accident. Sociologically, the Arapaho occupied the geographical center among the five ethnic distinct tribal-nations that existed prior to the direct European contact.2 3.2 Culture History and Territory Similar to many other societies, the ethnic formation of the Arapaho on the Great Plains into a tribal-nation was a complex sociological process. The original homeland for the tribe, according to evidence, was the region of the Red River and the Saskatchewan River in settled horticultural communities. From this original homeland various Arapaho divisions gradually migrated southwest, adapting to living on the Great Plains.3 One of the sacred objects, symbolic of their life as horticulturalists, that they carried with them onto the Northern Plains is a stone resembling an ear of corn. According to their oral traditions, the Arapaho were composed originally of five distinct tribes. 4 Arapaho elders remember the Black Hills country, and claim that they once owned that region, before moving south and west into the heart of the Great Plains. By the early nineteenth century, the Arapaho positioned themselves geographically from the two forks of the Cheyenne River, west of the Black Hills southward to the eastern front 87 of the central Rocky Mountains at the headwaters of the Arkansas River.5 By 1806 the Arapaho formed an alliance with the Cheyenne to resist against further intrusion west by the Sioux beyond the Missouri River.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment for the Jicarilla Apache Nation Water Subcontract
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE JICARILLA APACHE NATION WATER SUBCONTRACT (FORMERLY CALLED THE USBR/PNM WATER CONTRACT RENEWAL AND EXTENSION) US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, WESTERN COLORADO AREA OFFICE SEPTEMBER 2001 nited Stat~-s---Departmentor-theInterior BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Upper Colorado Region WesternColondo AreaOffice 2764 CompassDrive, Suitc 106 rrn 835E 2'" Avcnuc, Suitc 300 GrandJunction CO 81506-8785 ~ 20 2001 DurangoCO 81301-5475 WCD-EJensen ENV-6.00 To: Interested Agencies, Indian Tribes, Organizations, and Individuals Subject: Finding of No Significant Impact: Jicarilla Apache Nation Water Subcontract (formally called the USBR/PNM Water Contract Renewal and Extension) Enclosed for your information is a copy of the subject Finding of No Significant Impact (FaNS I). The FONSI represents final compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act on thc approval of an agrecmcnt between the Public Service Company of Ncw Mexico (PNM) and the Jicarilla Apachc Nation. This significs that the agreement is clcared from an cnvironmental compliance perspective for future approval by the Secretaryof the Interior through Burcau of Reclamation. Thc agrecment will allow the Jicarilla Apache Nation to supply and c deliver 16.200 acre-feet (AF) of water per ycar to PNM for use in thc operation of the San Juan available to them through the Jicarilla Nation Water Rights Settlcment Act. A Draft Environmental Assessmentwas released to the public on July 31,2001, for public review and comment. Only minor comments were received on the Draft Environmental Assessment; therefore, no Final Environmental Assessmentwill be printed and distributed. An addendum showing where changes were made to the Draft Environmental Assessment is enclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • For the Osage Nation
    AGENDA ITEM REPORT Meeting Date: May 11, 2021 Staff Contact: Carol Lahman, City Attorney Department: Legal Subject: Approve the Execution of the Forbearance Agreement entered into by The Osage Nation, the City of Enid and the Enid Municipal Authority, and authorize payment in the amount of $1,000,000.00. Background: To allow the Kaw Lake Water Supply Project to proceed, the City of Enid has been in negotiations with The Osage Nation to find an accommodation for the City project that would not affect The Osage Nation’s or the State of Oklahoma’s interest, rights or position as to natural resources, property, or water. The Forbearance Agreement, if approved, would resolve the issues between the City of Enid and The Osage Nation without either party resorting to lengthy and expensive litigation that would delay the start of the construction of the Kaw Lake pipeline. The negotiations have taken place over the last four years. If approved, the Enid Municipal Authority will pay $1,000,000.00 to The Nation within 30 days, as part of the consideration for the agreement. The City will also reserve a certain amount of the capacity in the pipeline for the Nation. This does not compromise the ability of the City to carry the full OWRB permit amount of water from Kaw Lake to Enid. The agreement provides that if the Nation, at some point, decides to make use of the capacity, that the Nation will construct and pay for the improvements necessary, and will pay for the cost of maintenance and operation attributable to this use.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Western Slope
    JOURNAL OF THE WESTERN SLOPE VO LUME II. NUMBER 1 WINTER 1996 ~,. ~. I "Queen" Chipeta-page I Audre Lucile Ball : Her Life in the Grand Valley From World War 1I Through Ihe Fifties-page 23 JOURNAL OF THE WESTERN SLOPE is published quarterly by two student organizations at Mesa State College: the Mesa State College Historical Society and the Alpha-Gamma-Epsilon Chapter of Phi Alpha Theta. Annual subscriptions are $14. (Single copies are available by contacting the editors of the Journal.) Retailers are en­ couraged to write for prices. Address subscriptions and orders for back issues to: Mesa State College Journal of the Western Slope P.O. Box 2647 Grand Junction, CO 81502 GUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS: The pu'pOSfI 01 THE X>URNAl OF THE WESTERN SlOf'E is 10 I!flCOUrIIge tdloIarly sl\l(!y 01 CoIorIIdD'$ Western Slope. The primary goat is to pre5erve !loci leeonl its hislory; IIowewI. IttideS on anlhlopology', economics, govemmelli. naltJfal histOtY. arod SOCiology will be considered. Author$hlP is open 10 anyomt who wishel to svbmiI original and 5dloIarly malerialliboullhe WMteln Slope. The ed~OtS encourage teners oIlnq~ .rom prOSp8CIlYG authors. 5eI'Id matMiahs lind IellafS 10 THE JOURNAL Of THE WESTERN SLOPE, MeS<! State College. P.O. Box 26<&7. Grand June­ tion,C081502, I ) ConlrlbulOfS are requasled 10 senCIltleir mallUscript on an IBM-compalibla disk. DO NOT SEND THE ORIGINAL. Editol1l will not retlJm disl\s, Matarial snoold be tootnoted. The editors will give preien,.... ce to submissions at about IMrnly·live pages. 2) AlkJw thtlll(!itol1l sixty days to review mar.uscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frontiers of American Grand Strategy: Settlers, Elites, and the Standing Army in America’S Indian Wars
    THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 11, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Andrew Alden Szarejko All Rights Reserved ii THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrew O. Bennett, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Much work on U.S. grand strategy focuses on the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. If the United States did have a grand strategy before that, IR scholars often pay little attention to it, and when they do, they rarely agree on how best to characterize it. I show that federal political elites generally wanted to expand the territorial reach of the United States and its relative power, but they sought to expand while avoiding war with European powers and Native nations alike. I focus on U.S. wars with Native nations to show how domestic conditions created a disjuncture between the principles and practice of this grand strategy. Indeed, in many of America’s so- called Indian Wars, U.S. settlers were the ones to initiate conflict, and they eventually brought federal officials into wars that the elites would have preferred to avoid. I develop an explanation for settler success and failure in doing so. I focus on the ways that settlers’ two faits accomplis— the act of settling on disputed territory without authorization and the act of initiating violent conflict with Native nations—affected federal decision-making by putting pressure on speculators and local elites to lobby federal officials for military intervention, by causing federal officials to fear that settlers would create their own states or ally with foreign powers, and by eroding the credibility of U.S.
    [Show full text]