DOCSLIB.ORG

Global: Whose Reflation? Martin Enlund Nordea Research, 31 January 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global: Whose Reflation? Martin Enlund Nordea Research, 31 January 2017 Global: whose reflation? Martin Enlund Nordea Research, 31 January 2017 It’s not all about Trump. “Reflation” has been in vogue for a few months – helped by higher headline inflation. But the jury is still out on whether it’s a global story or a local/US story. The FX conclusions differ markedly; keep an eye on EA core. This is a strategy piece not necessarily consistent with Nordea’s forecasts. • Higher headline inflation welcome for the ECB, but core inflation holds the key • Reflation story mostly American (& USD-positive), unless EA/ROW core inflation picks up • Core inflation well in excess of 1.1% likely needed to sound the all clear Our view: low conviction on the trajectory of the USD. Like other market participants we await fiscal & trade clarity from Team Trump. Substantial fiscal easing or clear momentum towards moves such as border-adjusted taxes would be USD-positive, as would hawkish balance sheet rhetoric from the Fed. In the absence of such signs, the pair wants to go higher for positioning reasons. As for upward risks; (unilateral) moves by Trump towards import tariffs would be EUR/USD-positive for de-risking / yield spread reasons. Clear signs of higher core inflation could also provide EUR-positive ammunition... It’s not all about Trump… The ECB has surprised FX markets recently, with Draghi not being as hawkish as some had hoped at the January press conference, and Nowotny this week dashing new speculation of a near-term taper (“The discussion about our overall economic assessment will probably (take place) in June”). To provide a short answer why this has been a surprise; too much focus on headline inflation! (This applies especially for German media). We "knew" that inflation was going to come close or reach the ECB's inflation target already six months ago. Oil prices were going to provide a huge boost to the numbers globally (see e.g. Global: are FI markets too complacent? from August. Indeed, only a severe drop in oil prices would have prevented this). nexus.nordea.com/research Chart 1: Oil prices giving a big boost to headline inflation globally, but not for long Higher headline inflation is welcome for most developed market central banks at this juncture, and reduces the risks of deanchoring of inflation expectations and as such it is modestly net hawkish for the ECB. However, the surge in Euro Area headline inflation may largely be a temporary effect. Unless energy prices keep trending higher, headline inflation (currently 1.8%) will fall towards core inflation (currently 0.9%) likely starting in March 2017. Core inflation at 0.9% is well below its 1.5% average since 1999. US headline inflation will also start to drop soon, but in contrast to the EA it will drop towards relatively high US core inflation at 2.2% (core CPI) or 1.7% (the core PCE deflator – in line with its average since 1999). In short, US inflation trends are so far much more benign than those in the Euro Area. nexus.nordea.com/research Chart 2: Core inflation trends quite different so far It is true that given recent robust developments in EA labour markets, OECD’s measure of the Euro Area output gap (unemployment vs the natural rate of unemployment) will have closed with a year. This should help core inflation pick up from today’s low levels. Chart 3: Output gap, schmoutput gap? It is also true that such measures of the output gap are highly uncertain. For instance, In January 2012, the Fed believed in a longer-run unemployment rate of 5.2%-6.0%, compared to 4.7%-5.0% today. The Fed has lowered its NAIRU estimates as a result of a lack of inflation and wage pressures. nexus.nordea.com/research To further illustrate the uncertainty with such estimates, have a look at G10 output gaps. Given OECD’s estimates, we are supposed to see overheated labour markets and price pressures in both Sweden and Switzerland – incidentally the two countries in the world with the lowest policy rates… Chart 4: G10 unemployment gaps The seasonal pattern of EA core inflation implies that core inflation will be range-bound between 0.7% and 1.1% this year (chart 5). For the ECB and the market to sound the all clear on inflation, we are likely to need core inflation numbers well in excess of 1.1%. If we get that, then the reflationary story is truly global in nature – which large implications for ECB policy, German bond yield, and more (EUR-positive). nexus.nordea.com/research Chart 5: European core inflation – will it break out of its range? If core inflation instead stays range-bound, the NIRP & QE world as we know it will persist for a while yet. This would also imply that the USD-positive policy divergence theme remains intact, and that the Fed is likely to remain quite alone in the camp of hawkish central banks for now. In short; go on keeping an eye on Trump's tireless tweeting, but don't forget the potentially game-changing macro drivers such as EA core inflation... nexus.nordea.com/research Disclaimer and legal disclosures Origin of the publication or report The perception of opinions or recommendations such as Buy or Sell or This publication or report originates from: Nordea Bank AB (publ), including similar expressions may vary and the definition is therefore shown in the its branches Nordea Danmark, filial af Nordea Bank AB (publ), Sverige, research material or on the website of each named source. Nordea Bank AB (publ), filial i Finland and Nordea Bank AB (publ), filial i Norge (together “Nordea”) acting through their unit Nordea Markets. Limitation of liability Nordea or other associated and affiliated companies assume no liability as Nordea Bank AB (publ) is supervised by the Swedish Financial Supervisory regards to any investment, divestment or retention decision taken by the Authority and the branches are supervised by the Swedish Financial investor on the basis of this publication or report. In no event will Nordea or Supervisory Authority and the Financial Supervisory Authorities in their other associated and affiliated companies be liable for direct, indirect or respective countries. incidental, special or consequential damages resulting from the information in this publication or report. Content of the publication or report This publication or report has been prepared solely by Nordea Markets. Risk information The risk of investing in certain financial instruments, including those Opinions or suggestions from Nordea Markets may deviate from mentioned in this document, is generally high, as their market value is recommendations or opinions presented by other departments in Nordea. exposed to a lot of different factors such as the operational and financial The reason may typically be the result of differing time horizons, conditions of the relevant company, growth prospects, change in interest methodologies, contexts or other factors. rates, the economic and political environment, foreign exchange rates, shifts in market sentiments etc. Where an investment or security is denominated in Opinions and price targets are based on one or more methods of valuation, a different currency to the investor’s currency of reference, changes in rates for instance cash flow analysis, use of multiples, behavioural technical of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of or analyses of underlying market movements in combination with from that investment to the investor. Past performance is not a guide to considerations of the market situation and the time horizon. Key future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions of forecasts, price targets and projections in research cited or assumptions that may not be realized. When investing in individual shares, reproduced appear in the research material from the named sources. The the investor may lose all or part of the investments. date of publication appears from the research material cited or reproduced. Opinions and estimates may be updated in subsequent versions of the Conflicts of interest publication or report, provided that the relevant company/issuer is treated Nordea, affiliates or staff in Nordea, may perform services for, solicit anew in such later versions of the publication or report. business from, hold long or short positions in, or otherwise be interested in the investments (including derivatives) of any company mentioned in the Validity of the publication or report publication or report. All opinions and estimates in this publication or report are, regardless of source, given in good faith, and may only be valid as of the stated date of To limit possible conflicts of interest and counter the abuse of inside this publication or report and are subject to change without notice. knowledge, the analysts of Nordea Markets are subject to internal rules on sound ethical conduct, the management of inside information, handling of No individual investment or tax advice unpublished research material, contact with other units of Nordea and The publication or report is intended only to provide general and preliminary personal account dealing. The internal rules have been prepared in information to investors and shall not be construed as the basis for any accordance with applicable legislation and relevant industry standards. The investment decision. This publication or report has been prepared by Nordea object of the internal rules is for example to ensure that no analyst will Markets as general information for private use of investors to whom the abuse or cause others to abuse confidential information. It is the policy of publication or report has been distributed, but it is not intended as a Nordea Markets that no link exists between revenues from capital markets personal recommendation of particular financial instruments or strategies activities and individual analyst remuneration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neoliberalism and the Discontented
    1 NEOLIBERALISM AND THE DISCONTENTED GREGORY ALBO hen neoliberalism made its debut as a political project at the end of Wthe 1970s, it was taken for granted in most quarters of the Left that it was neither politically nor economically sustainable. The emerging New Right regimes of Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Helmut Kohl and Bri- an Mulroney could intensify class conflict and spread the ideology of market populism, it was suggested, but they would leave no enduring institutional or political legacy. The monetarist and free market policies trumpeted by these governments – and incorporated into the policy arsenal of the international financial institutions – could only magnify the economic problems that had ended the postwar boom. The increasing complexity of post-Fordist tech- nologies and organization demanded far greater institutional capacities than capitalist markets and firms could supply on their own. Growing civil society movements were, moreover, beginning to forge a political accord with tradi- tional working-class unions and parties: a new egalitarian politics was being fashioned for the ‘new times’ to accommodate previously oppressed social identities. The political question of the day was, as Eric Hobsbawm was one of the foremost in arguing, the voting and programmatic agenda of such a ‘rational left’. The prospect of a ‘popular front’ government, built on a coalition of disciplined unions, new social movements, and social democratic parties sup- ported by communists, would serve as the foundation from which to bridge the neoliberal interlude. In 1986, two decades ago, Hobsbawm, speaking with respect to Britain, had already concluded that the neoliberals’ performance ‘utterly discredited, in the minds of most people, the privatizing “free mar- ket” ideology of the suburban crusaders who dressed up the right of the rich to get richer among the ruins as a way of solving the world’s and Britain’s problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Koizumi-Era Financial Services Sector Reforms Naomi Fink
    Lessons from Koizumi-Era Financial Services Sector Reforms Naomi Fink Discussion Paper No. 80 Naomi Fink Founder and CEO, Europacifica Consulting Discussion Paper Series APEC Study Center Columbia University November 2016 Case Study: Financial Services Sector Reform in Japan APEC Policy Support Unit 27th July 2016 Prepared by: Naomi Fink, Europacifica Consulting & RMIT University Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Policy Support Unit Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Tel: (65) 6891-9600 Fax: (65) 6891-9690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org Produced for: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation APEC Policy Support Unit APEC#[APEC publication number] This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 Singapore License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/sg/. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of APEC Member Economies. Table of Contents LESSONS FROM KOIZUMI-ERA FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR REFORMS ........................... 1 FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR REFORM IN JAPAN .......................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1. The need for structural reform in Japan .............................................................................. 2 1.1. Political economy of the Japanese financial sector: .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism and the Discontented
    NEOLIBERALISM AND THE DISCONTENTED GREGORY ALBO hen neoliberalism made its debut as a political project at the end of Wthe 1970s, it was taken for granted in most quarters of the Left that it was neither politically nor economically sustainable. The emerging New Right regimes of Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Helmut Kohl and Brian Mulroney could intensify class conflict and spread the ideology of market populism, it was suggested, but they would leave no enduring insti- tutional or political legacy. The monetarist and free market policies trum- peted by these governments – and incorporated into the policy arsenal of the international financial institutions – could only magnify the economic problems that had ended the postwar boom. The increasing complexity of post-Fordist technologies and organization demanded far greater institu- tional capacities than capitalist markets and firms could supply on their own. Growing civil society movements were, moreover, beginning to forge a political accord with traditional working-class unions and parties: a new egalitarian politics was being fashioned for the ‘new times’ to accommodate previously oppressed social identities. The political question of the day was, as Eric Hobsbawm was one of the foremost in arguing, the voting and programmatic agenda of such a ‘rational left’. The prospect of a ‘popular front’ government, built on a coalition of disciplined unions, new social movements, and social democratic par- ties supported by communists, would serve as the foundation from which to bridge the neoliberal interlude. In 1986, two decades ago, Hobsbawm, speaking with respect to Britain, had already concluded that the neoliber- als’ performance was ‘utterly discredited, in the minds of most people, the privatizing “free market” ideology of the suburban crusaders who dressed up the right of the rich to get richer among the ruins as a way of solving the world’s and Britain’s problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy in the Great Depression: What the Fed Did, and Why
    David C. Wheelock David C. Wheelock, assistant professor of economics at the University of Texas-Austin, is a visiting scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. David H. Kelly provided research assistance. Monetary Policy in the Great Depression: What the Fed Did, and Why SIXTY YEARS AGO the United States— role of monetary policy in causing the Depression indeed; most of the world—was in the midst of and the possibility that different policies might the Great Depression. Today, interest in the have made it less severe. Depression's causes and the failure of govern- ment policies to prevent it continues, peaking Much of the debate centers on whether mone- whenever the stock market crashes or the econ- tary conditions were "easy" or "tight" during the omy enters a recession. In the 1930s, dissatisfac- Depression—that is, whether money and credit tion with the failure of monetary policy to pre- were plentiful and inexpensive, or scarce and vent the Depression, or to revive the economy, expensive. During the 1930s, many Fed officials led to sweeping changes in the structure of the argued that money was abundant and "cheap," Federal Reserve System. One of the most impor- even "sloppy," because market interest rates tant changes was the creation of the Federal were low and few banks borrowed from the dis- Open Market Committee (FOMC) to direct open count window. Modern researchers who agree market policy. Recently Congress has again con- generally believe neither that monetary forces sidered possible changes in the Federal Reserve were responsible for the Depression nor that System.1 different policies could have alleviated it.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflation Trade” and Through an Eventual Tightening Policy Environment
    Relative value beyond the “reflation trade” and through an eventual tightening policy environment FEBRUARY 2021 Monetary Policy Drives Asset Inflation But the Fed seems almost defensive about The November announcements by its role in asset price inflation. In his Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna regarding January 27 press conference, Fed Chair highly encouraging vaccine efficacy data Powell flatly rejected this very suggestion: represented the first true bright spot for “If you look at what’s really been driving the near-term economic outlook since the asset prices in the last couple of months, beginning of the pandemic almost a year it isn’t monetary policy… It’s been ago. Credit and equity markets had already expectations about vaccines, and it’s also been on a virtually uninterrupted charge fiscal policy.” higher since March, buoyed by fiscal and This is true, to be sure. However, with monetary policy and more recently by an the Fed’s new policy of average inflation election result that seemed likely to deliver targeting (allowing inflation to overshoot its more calm, less uncertainty and more long-term 2% goal due to years of lagging) stimulus. The vaccine rollout seemed a and a palpable fear of triggering a repeat justification, if not an outright catalyst, for of the “taper tantrum” in 2013 by another leg higher, as a return to normalcy committing to telegraph an end to asset seemed closer than ever. purchases far in advance, it’s hard not to However, the vaccine rollout has been view the monetary policy environment fraught, new variants continue to emerge as a catalyst for increasingly aggressive and business restrictions come and go.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro and Macroeconomics: an Introduction
    Micro and Macroeconomics: An Introduction MICROECONOMICS AND MACROECONOMICS Dr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, Assistant Professor of Economics, Women’s College, Samastipur, L.N.Mithila University, Darbhanga(Bihar) Microeconomics and macroeconomics are two approaches to economic problems and economic analysis. These terms were first coined and used by Ragnar Frisch in 1933 and have now been adopted by economists the entire world over. “Microeconomics studies the economic action of a particular individual and well defined group of individuals, i.e., household, firms industries, etc. and macroeconomics studies the broad aggregate, such as total employment, total consumption, and all industries, particular commodities.” Meaning of Microeconomics According to Boulding, “Microeconomics is the study of particular firms, particular households, individual prices, wages, incomes, individual industries, particular commodities. According to Prof. Gardener Ackley, “Microeconomics deals with the division of total output among industries, products and firms and the allocation of resources among competing groups. It considers problems of income distribution. Its interest is in relative prices of particulars goods and services,” Content Writer: Vijay Kumar Gupta Micro and Macroeconomics: An Introduction According to Prof. Lerner, “Microeconomics consists of looking at the economy through a microscope, as it were, to see how the millions of cells in the body economic- the individuals or households as consumers, and the individuals or firms as producers-play their part in the working of the whole economic organism.’ From the above definitions, it is clear that under the microeconomics we study particular economic organism; for instance, individual prices, wages or incomes; economic behaviour of individual consumers and producers, etc. Under the microeconomics, following theories are studied: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of Reflation: Time to Move?
    The Return of Reflation: Time to Move? JANUARY 2021 By Portfolio Strategies Group Snapshot Recent chatter about “reflation” may have some investors wondering just › SEI does not generally believe investors what reflation means. In economic terms, reflation refers to inflation rising should try to broadly tailor a strategic from a below-average level back toward its long-term trend. At SEI, we (long-term) portfolio to any specific typically view reflationary periods as economic regimes where both growth growth/inflation environment. and inflation are accelerating. Exhibit 1 provides a model framework that › Yet, there are times it might be prudent to highlights expected asset performance during various environments, with tilt portfolio allocations toward assets that a reflationary environment shown in the top right quadrant. In such na are expected to do well given a compelling environment, we would expect real assets like commodities and real estate view of the economic outlook. to perform well. There are some important nuances to consider, however. › SEI believes we are now at a point where Exhibit 1: Economic Regimes Tend to Favor Certain Assets such a tilt makes sense, given our view that the U.S. is likely to see stronger growth and higher inflation once the world Rising Growth / Falling Inflation Rising Growth / Rising Inflation economy is able to move beyond the Risk Premiums Real Assets Equity Commodities COVID-19 pandemic. Riskier credit Real estate Growth Falling Growth / Falling Inflation Falling Growth / Rising Inflation Duration Hedges Government Bonds Inflation-linked bonds High-quality credit High-quality short duration Inflation For illustrative purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Market Outlook: What's Pulling the 10-Year Lower?
    WEEKLY MARKET What’s Pulling the 10-Year Lower? OUTLOOK JULY 8, 2021 Technical factors are pulling the U.S. 10- year Treasury yield lower recently. They Table of Contents Lead Author include the dearth of Treasury issuance Ryan Sweet and short coverings. More fundamental Top of Mind ...................................... 3 Senior Director-Economic Research factors pushing rates lower are the [email protected] fading reflation trade and peak U.S. Week Ahead in Global Economy ... 6 growth. Asia-Pacific Geopolitical Risks ............................ 7 Katrina Ell Economist On the technical factors, the Treasury The Long View Christina Zhu has drawn down its General Account at U.S. ................................................................. 8 Economist the Federal Reserve faster than Europe .......................................................... 11 expected. The Treasury’s General Europe Asia-Pacific .................................................. 12 Ross Cioffi Account at the Fed has fallen by more Economist than $1 trillion since mid-September. Ratings Roundup ........................... 13 This has reduced the need for the Katrina Pirner Economist Treasury to issue additional Treasury Market Data ................................... 16 notes and bonds to finance past rounds U.S. of fiscal support. Less Treasury supply, CDS Movers .................................... 17 all else being equal, pushes Treasury Mark Zandi Issuance .......................................... 19 Chief Economist prices higher and yields lower. Its account remains double that seen pre- Steven Shields pandemic, so it still has some cash it can Economist tap into. This week there is also little Treasury issuance, and what is scheduled to be Ryan Kelly issued is mostly bills. This dearth of bill supply is also putting downward pressure on rates Data Specialist this week. There also appears to be another wave of short coverings as traders are ditch losing positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflation Trade Looks Back on Track
    For UBS marketing purposes Meanwhile, the reflation trade could still be challenged by setbacks in combating the COVID-19 pandemic, especially by the spread of the delta variant or the emergence of more transmissible or virulent variants. (ddp) Markets Reflation trade looks back on track 09 August 2021, 1:20 pm CEST, written by UBS Editorial Team Employment data on Friday helped allay fears that the US economy is losing momentum, with job creation for July beating expectations at 943,000. Unemployment—while still above pre-pandemic levels—declined to 5.4% from 5.9%. The data beneath the headline figures were also encouraging. A 380,000 rise in employment in the leisure and hospitality sectors indicates that economic reopening is on track and businesses are having less trouble finding workers than earlier in the recovery. The U6 measure of underemployment, which measures people who are working part-time for economic reasons, declined to 9.2% from 9.8%. So, we believe the reflation trade, which had recently gone into reverse, will come back into focus on a more sustained basis: 1. US yields are being driven more by positive growth data than by worries over inflation. It is notable that US 10-year yields have not increased significantly after the past two US consumer price index releases, which have shown the largest increases in more than a decade. However, the 10-year yield did rise around 7 basis points following the stronger- than-expected employment data on Friday. This suggests that markets have taken on board the Federal Reserve’s recent message that they view inflation pressures as transient, and that the timing of monetary tightening is more likely to be determined by the pace of employment gains.
    [Show full text]
  • Sticking with the Reflation Trade #75
    INVESTMENT INSIGHTS MONTHLY ISSUE #75 | 1st April 2021 ANYONE FOR A MEATLESS BURGER? EDITORIAL VIEW Page 2 • Eating too much meat is bad for the health, the environment and the conscience • The market for plant-based substitutes is transitioning from niche to mainstream • Sensory experience, price and availability: the three hurdles to mass adoption GLOBAL STRATEGY Page 3 • Recovery ahead, led by a roaring US economy • Consensus sees rising inflation as transitory: we agree • Equity roller coaster not over yet, but upward trajectory intact ASSET ALLOCATION Page 4 • Allocation – Reinforcing pro-cyclical bias within bonds, commodities and FX • Equities – Constructive stance, with barbell of reflation and quality plays • Forex – Favouring cyclical currencies at the expense of defensive ones 2 EDITORIAL VIEW | 1st April 2021 April | 1st Anyone for a meatless burger? #75 • Eating too much meat is bad for the health, the environment and the conscience • The market for plant-based substitutes is transitioning from niche to mainstream • Sensory experience, price and availability: the three hurdles to mass adoption By now, most of us are aware that the standard offerings, with egg or gelatine as potential omnivore diet is unsustainable. Not only is it additional ingredients. Insect-based solutions are fundamentally unhealthy, but it is also placing a another option, with a superior conversion of huge strain on the environment – as well as raising energy/protein relative to meat – but again an ethical issues. The way forward? Flexitarian diets, unattractive sensory profile to the average western INSIGHTS INVESTMENTS emphasising plant-based intake but allowing for end-consumer. At this point in time, the most occasional meat consumption, are fast gaining promising segment is novel vegan meat traction, particularly among millennials.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy: the Case for Reflation
    Investment Research — General Market Conditions 18 November 2016 Strategy The case for reflation – what it means and what to watch Following the election of Donald Trump as US president, the reflation theme has gained extra fuel. Industrial commodity prices soared adding to the gains already seen this Key points year. In addition, US market inflation expectations got a big lift. We – and others – have cried wolf over the past couple of years in terms of rising inflation but it did not happen. We see a case for reflation in the However, one day it will, and the question is whether that time is now. Based on commodity US but less so in the euro area. prices it is almost certain that so-called base effects will push up inflation over the next six We expect US reflation to lead to a months. However, this will only be temporary unless commodity prices continue to trend further rise in equities, higher higher in coming years. Real reflation is a sustained rise in inflation in which the bond yields and a stronger USD economy is running hot, pushing wage inflation higher as well. over the next six months. Below, we have made a small checklist of factors in order to judge whether the rise in inflation is the real thing – or just a temporary lift. Here, we focus mainly on the US and the euro area. Based on the checklist, we see a good case for reflation in the US whereas it will take more time for the euro area to join. The euro area has more slack left, still many growth headwinds and no signs of wage inflation picking up.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary-Of-Economics-2.Pdf
    Dictionary of Economics A & C Black ț London First published in Great Britain in 2003 Reprinted 2006 A & C Black Publishers Ltd 38 Soho Square, London W1D 3HB © P. H. Collin 2003 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission of the publishers A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library eISBN-13: 978-1-4081-0221-3 Text Production and Proofreading Heather Bateman, Katy McAdam A & C Black uses paper produced with elemental chlorine-free pulp, harvested from managed sustainable forests. Text typeset by A & C Black Printed in Italy by Legoprint Preface Economics is the basis of our daily lives, even if we do not always realise it. Whether it is an explanation of how firms work, or people vote, or customers buy, or governments subsidise, economists have examined evidence and produced theories which can be checked against practice. This book aims to cover the main aspects of the study of economics which students will need to learn when studying for examinations at various levels. The book will also be useful for the general reader who comes across these terms in the financial pages of newspapers as well as in specialist magazines. The dictionary gives succinct explanations of the 3,000 most frequently found terms. It also covers the many abbreviations which are often used in writing on economic subjects. Entries are also given for prominent economists, from Jeremy Bentham to John Rawls, with short biographies and references to their theoretical works.
    [Show full text]