Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Unalakleet, Alaska
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Open-File Report 95-347
Prepared in cooperation with the
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Unalakleet, Alaska
By Joseph M. Dorava
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Open-File Report 95-347
Prepared in cooperation with the
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Anchorage, Alaska 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director
For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from:
U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Chief Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Box25286, MS 517 4230 University Drive, Suite 201 Federal Center Anchorage, AK 99508-4664 Denver, CO 80225-0425 CONTENTS
Abstract ...... 1 Introduction...... 1 Background ...... 1 Location...... 1 History...... 3 Physical setting ...... 3 Climate ...... 3 Vegetation...... 4 Geology...... 4 Hydrology ...... 4 Surface water ...... 4 Floods ...... 5 Ground water...... 5 Drinking water...... 6 Summary ...... 7 References cited...... 7 Appendix l.Well drillers' logs ...... A-l Appendix 2. Ground-water data...... A-2 Appendix 3. Drinking-water sources ...... A-3
FIGURES
1. Map showing location of Unalakleet, Alaska, and Federal Aviation Administration facilities...... 2
TABLES
1. Mean monthly and annual temperature, precipitation and snowfall, Unalakleet, Alaska, 1941-87 ...... 3
Contents III CONVERSION FACTORS
Multiply By To obtain millimeter (mm) 0.03937 inch meter (m) 3.281 foot kilometer (km) 0.6214 mile square kilometer (km2) 0.3861 square mile cubic meter per second (m3/s) 35.3107 cubic foot per second cubic meter per second per 91.49 cubic foot per second per square kilometer [(m3/s)/km2] square mile liter (L) 0.2642 gallon liters per second (L/s) 15.85 gallon per minute liter per day (L/d) 0.2642 gallon per day
In this report, temperature is reported in degrees Celsius (°C), which can be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) by the following equation: °F=1.8(°C)
VERTICAL DATUM
Sea level: In this report, "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 A geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of the United States and Canada, formerly called Sea Level Datum of 1929.
IV Contents Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Unalakleet, Alaska
By Joseph M. Dorava
Abstract
The remote village of Unalakleet is on the alluvial plain of the Unalakleet River in northwest ern Alaska. The Federal Aviation Administration has operated airway-support facilities at Unala kleet since 1942 and wishes to consider the severity of contamination, the environmental setting, and hydrogeologic conditions when evaluating options for compliance with environmental regula tions. The transitional climatic conditions near Unalakleet provide a mean annual temperature of -3.2 degrees Celsius and a mean annual precipitation of about 360 millimeters. Wet tundra vegeta tion surrounds the abundant surface-water bodies near Unalakleet and barren beaches extend along the coast. Unalakleet obtains its drinking water from an infiltration gallery near Powers Creek about 7 kilometers north of the village. Surface spills and disposal of hazardous materials com bined with storm-surge flooding in Unalakleet may affect the quality of the drinking water. Alter native drinking-water sources are not locally available. More distant surface-water sources may provide drinking-water alternatives for Unalakleet; however, their quantity and quality are unknown.
INTRODUCTION
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) owns and (or) operates airway-support and nav igational facilities throughout Alaska. At many of these sites, fuels and potentially hazardous mate rials such as solvents, polychlorinated biphenyls, and pesticides may have been used and (or) disposed of. To determine if environmentally hazardous materials have been spilled or disposed of at the sites, the FAA is conducting environmental studies mandated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. To complete these more comprehensive environmental studies, the FAA requires information on the hydrology and geology of areas surrounding the sites. This report, the product of compilation, review, and summary of existing hydrologic and geologic data by the U.S. Geolog ical Survey, in cooperation with the FAA, provides such supplemental information for the FAA facility and nearby areas at Unalakleet, Alaska. Also presented in this report is a description of the environmental setting of the Unalakleet area.
BACKGROUND
Location
Unalakleet is in northwestern Alaska (fig. 1) at about lat 63°52' N, long 160°47' W., 240 km southeast of Nome and 650 km west of Fairbanks. Unalakleet is a small remote village on the east ern shore of Norton Sound near the mouth of the Unalakleet River, and is accessible only by air or sea. In 1990, the population of Unalakleet was 714 (U.S. Bureau of Census, 1991). The village, an
INTRODUCTION 1 160° 30'
0 1 2 3 MILES 1 1 1 1 1 I _j 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 3 KILOMETERS
Base from U.S. Geological Survey, Unalakleet. Alaska, 1:250.000,1952
Figure 1. Location of Unalakleet, Alaska, and Federal Aviation Administration facilities. Light shaded areas represent uplands with elevations greater than 61 m.
2 Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Unalakleet, Alaska airport runway, and many of the FAA facilities are about 8 m above sea level on a narrow spit of land between Kouwegok Slough and Norton Sound (fig. 1). Additional FAA airway-support facil ities include navigation aids identified by radio towers east and north of the runway (fig. 1).
History The FAA or its predecessors have had facilities in Unalakleet since 1942 when the military used the site to ferry aircraft to Siberia. Former Department of Defense facilities in Unalakleet include a radar site and a radio-communications site (fig. 1). A detailed account of FAA-owned, leased, or transferred properties in Unalakleet and a listing of suspected sources of contamination near these facilities can be found in an Environmental Compliance Investigation Report (ECIR) of the FAA facilities in Unalakleet (Ecology and Environment, Inc., 1992).
PHYSICAL SETTING
Climate
Unalakleet lies in the transitional climatic zone where the maritime influence of Norton Sound and the continental climate of interior Alaska combine to produce pronounced temperature variations, low precipitation, and light surface winds (Hartman and Johnson, 1984). The mean annual temperature in Unalakleet for 1941-87 was -3.2 °C; however, temperatures range from a July mean maximum of 16.2 °C to a December mean minimum of -20.6 °C (Leslie, 1989). Mean annual precipitation is about 360 mm and includes about 950 mm of snowfall. The months of great est rainfall are July and August and the month of highest snowfall is November. Mean monthly and annual temperature, precipitation, and snowfall are summarized in table 1.
Table 1. Mean monthly and annual temperature, precipitation, and snowfall for the period 1941 to 1987, Unalakleet, Alaska [Modified from Leslie (1989); °C, degree Celsius; mm, millimeter]
Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Annual
Temperature (°C)
Mean maximum1 -12.1 -11.9 -8.4 -1.3 7.6 12.7 16.2 15.0 10.5 0.8 -7.4 -13.2 0.7
Mean minimum -19.8 -20.2 -18.1 -10.4 -0.9 5.3 8.8 7.7 2.5 -6.0 -14.1 -20.6 -7.2
Mean -16.0 -16.1 -13.4 -5.9 3.3 9.0 12.5 11.3 6.5 -2.6 -10.8 -16.8 -3.2 Precipitation (mm) Total
12.2 11.2 14.2 12.2 16.3 29.7 59.9 90.9 57.4 25.7 13.7 12.2 355.6 Snowfall (mm) Total
124.5 127.0 139.7 88.9 22.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.8 124.5 170.2 132.1 947.4
Maximum, for period of record, 30.6, July 1972. 2Minimum for period of record, -46.7, December 1974.
PHYSICAL SETTING 3 Vegetation Vegetation in the Unalakleet area consists of a closed spruce-hardwood forest inland along the Unalakleet River, wet tundra near sloughs and along the coast, and alpine tundra on the dry upland slopes of the Nulato Hills north and west of the village (Viereck and Little, 1972). The for ested riparian areas have widely spaced, mature white spruce, black spruce, tamarack, white birch, poplar, and cottonwood. Undergrowth consists of willow and young cottonwood (Sloan and others, 1986; Viereck and Little, 1972). The wet tundra areas adjacent to Kouwegok Slough, the mouth of Unalakleet River, and Norton Sound consists predominantly of sedges and grasses. The alpine tun dra areas inland from Unalakleet are covered with lichens, mosses, sedges, dwarf birch, lingon- berry, crowberry, Labrador tea, and other low-growing shrubs (Viereck and Little, 1972).
Geology The geology of the Unalakleet area has been described at a reconnaissance level by Cass (1959) and in more detail by Patton and Moll (1985). Bedrock exposures are not at the FAA facil ities in Unalakleet. Volcanic graywacke and mudstone are exposed along the coastline north and south of Unalakleet and in steep banks along the Unalakleet River. Sandstone and shale are exposed in the Nulato Hills across the North River. The village of Unalakleet and the FAA facilities are situated on sand-and-gravel flood-plain deposits of the Unalakleet River (Patton and Moll, 1985). Drillers' logs indicate that the depth to bedrock is about 12m near Powers Creek, 7 km north of Unalakleet (appendix 1). Permafrost generally lies under the coastal areas along Norton Sound and polygonal ice wedges are along the coast; however, a test boring near Unalakleet did not reach permafrost within about 10 m below land surface (Ferrians, 1965). Drillers' logs from wells near Powers Creek indi cate that the top of frozen ground occurs at depths ranging from 4.6 to 15.2 m (appendix 1). Areas adjacent to and beneath streams and lakes are typically thawed by the heat from these water bodies and generally are unfrozen (Ferrians, 1965). Organic-rich soils in the Unalakleet area are characterized by a thick peaty surface mat and a maximum active layer thickness of about 0.5 m where permafrost is present (Rieger and others, 1979). Because of the seasonal variations in temperature and precipitation, the soils are alternately wet and dry as indicated by their characteristic mottled, dark-gray appearance (Rieger and others, 1979). The predominant silt loam soils are developed on alluvium and colluvium (Rieger and oth ers, 1979).
HYDROLOGY
Surface Water The village of Unalakleet is nearly surrounded by water. The Unalakleet River flows from west to east along the southern edge of the village. Kouwegok Slough extends from the north along the western edge of the village, and Norton Sound is to the east (fig. 1). Many abandoned channels along Kouwegok Slough and the Unalakleet River drain to the south and west. The Unalakleet River is part of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (Sloan and others, 1986; U.S. Bureau of Land Management, 1983)
4 Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Unalakleet, Alaska Snowmelt and rainfall runoff supply most of the water in the streams of the region. Discharge in local streams typically increases in late May or early June and increases again during heavy rain fall in late summer or early fall. Minimum discharge will occur following extended periods of reduced runoff in late winter or early spring. The drainage basin of the Unalakleet River has an area of about 5,300 km2 upstream from the mouth at Unalakleet (Sloan and others, 1986). During a hydrologic reconnaissance study in 1983, Sloan and others, (1986) found that the river and its major tributaries contributed between 0.1 and 0.26 (mQ /s)/kmf) of water in August, and between 0.0 and 0.003 (m*i /s)/kmO of water during March. These values are almost the extremes for unit discharge in the river because the August measure ments were made after heavy rains when the river was about 0.3 m higher than normal, and the March measurements were made after an extended period of reduced runoff.
Floods
The flood hazard in Unalakleet is considered to be high (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1993). The primary sources of flooding in this coastal village are high tides and storm-driven waves. Major flooding occurred in 1965, 1968, 1971, and 1974 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1993). Data from the files of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Plain Management Section indicate that in 1965, the largest recorded flood in Unalakleet was caused by storm-driven waves. The flood inundated the entire village and had a peak stage of about 6.6 m above sea level (Harlan Legare, hydrologist, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, oral commun., 1995). The Corps of Engineers plans to use the recorded occurrence of floods in Unalakleet to produce a refined approximation of the probability of storm-surge tide flooding (Harlan Legare, hydrologist, U.S. Army Corps of Engi neers, oral commun., 1995). This refinement is required because the 100-year storm-surge tide is currently estimated to be about 23 m high in the marine area near Unalakleet (Brower and others, 1977). Storm surges usually occur during the fall when Norton Sound is free of ice. Strong, persis tent, onshore winds blowing across vast open stretches of Norton Sound generate high waves and may cause coastal flooding especially during high tide. Normal tide range for the Norton Sound area is less than 1 m (Brower and others, 1977; Hartman and Johnson, 1984). Although not the primary source of flooding in Unalakleet, overbank flooding on the Unala kleet River also is possible and may affect the village and the FAA facilities along the river. During August 1983, Sloan and others (1986) found evidence for a flood with a peak stage of about 1.5 m above the normal water surface. No evidence of ice-jam flooding was observed, which suggests that the springtime flood heights were not augmented by backwater from ice (Sloan and others, 1986). Because river floods have not been a significant problem in Unalakleet, no new flood- frequency calculations were made. On the basis of regional-flood characteristics (Lamke, 1979), estimates of the 2-year flood and the 50-year flood for the Unalakleet River at the mouth are 600 and 1,240 m3/s respectively (Sloan and others, 1986). The potential for flooding at specific loca tions along the river, however, is difficult to evaluate without detailed investigations of flood heights and local topography.
Ground Water
Because of permafrost and the low permeability of bedrock in most of the area, ground water is recharged and discharged principally in the alluvium along stream courses (Sloan and others, 1986). Surface-water drainage from the Nulato Hills north and east of Unalakleet enters the North
HYDROLOGY 5 River, Powers Creek, and Unalakleet River, which flow to the southwest and west respectively. An alluvial aquifer in this setting probably would be confined to the area between these hills and the coast. Environmental remediation at former Defense Department facilities, located between the Nulato Hills and the coast northeast of Unalakleet, is planned (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1990a, b and 1991a, b; Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1985). Although few details pf aquifer characteristics are available, Selkregg (1976) states that the alluvial plain of the Unalakleet River can provide as much as 0.6 L/s of ground water. Furthermore, Williams (1970) states that ground water is available in a similar environmental setting in an unfro zen alluvial aquifer under the Koyukuk River about 150 km northeast of Unalakleet. Marine gravel and sand in spits, barrier bars, raised beaches, and some deltas near Unalakleet may contain small quantities of fresh-water. These features are known to contain ground water in the Nome area; how ever, heavy pumping or seasonal storm surges may result in saltwater intrusion into these coastal aquifers. Ground-water investigations at the nearby villages of Koyuk, about 120 km north of Unalakleet, and Shaktolik, about 50 km north, which are in a similar climatologic, hydrologic, and geologic setting as Unalakleet, indicate that adequate sources of drinking water could be obtained by installing shallow horizontal infiltration pipes or drilling shallow vertical wells in inland areas away from the coast (Waller, 1958). Information about several wells near the FAA facilities in Unalakleet including depth, yield, water-surface elevation measurements, and miscellaneous water-quality properties is given in appendix 2. A 8.5-meter-deep well that supplies water to the quarters area had a reported yield of about 1 L/s. Another 13-meter-deep well reported to be inside a garage also yielded about 1 L/s. A third well at the Control Building was 9.4 m deep and yielded about 1.3 L/s of brackish water from an aquifer that was 4.6 m below land surface. The 16.8-meter-deep fire well is reported to contain saltwater, but its potential yield and exact location are unknown. On November 24,1958, a 5.1-meter-deep well at the Unalakleet school had a water level of 2.44 m below land surface. Water-quality constituents and properties measured in water samples from these wells include con centrations of major ions silica, aluminum, magnesium, chlorine, fluorine, and dissolved sol ids and measurements of alkalinity, specific conductance, pH, and color (appendix 2). The U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) provided records describing 16 wells in the Unala kleet area (appendix 1). The USPHS records include wells that range from 6 to 33 m below land surface. These wells were developed in aquifer materials ranging from sandy gravel to clay and rock. Several wells were contaminated with saltwater, and others had an inadequate quantity of water. The 10.4-meter-deep well near Powers Creek is identified as an excellent source of water and yielded 2.5 L/s (appendix 1).
DRINKING WATER
Drinking water is provided by a public water system that collects water from an infiltration gallery near Powers Creek (Environmental Services, Ltd., 1980). The village water is stored in a 3.8-million-liter tank and is treated before distribution. The quality of public water supplies is mon itored regularly, and the water supply must meet current regulations (U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, 1995; Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, 1995).
6 Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Unalakleet, Alaska Water-use withdrawals of about 190 L/d per person were estimated for Unalakleet on the basis of the 1990 population of 714. The water use compares with an average water use per person of 1,960 L/d estimated for all uses for the entire State of Alaska in 1990 (Solley and others, 1993). In 1977, alternative sources of drinking water for Unalakleet were investigated by the Indian Health Services (A.D. Ronimus, hydrologist, Indian Health Service, written commun., 1977; appendix 3, this report). Ground-water and surface-water alternatives were evaluated for their potential to supply Unalakleet with acceptable drinking water. All local drinking-water sources that were investigated (except for a single 10.4-meter-deep well near Powers Creek) were discounted because they produced salty water or because they had significant accessibility problems (appendix 3). These results indicate that Unalakleet's present source of drinking water may not have a rea sonable alternative as defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1987). A more dis tant alternative source of drinking water may be expensive to develop, but may be available from the South River or perhaps from the Ryan and Coral Lakes (fig. 1) if they are deep enough so that they do not freeze completely in the winter. However, data are not adequate to characterize the quantity and quality of waters from these more distant alternative sources.
SUMMARY
The remote location of Unalakleet makes the village dependent on the air or sea for transpor tation. The transitional climatic conditions of the area provide long cold winters and short cool summers. These climatic conditions also influence streamflow in the Unalakleet area, which is greatly reduced in the winter and dominated by snowmelt and rainfall runoff during other times. The potential for flooding generated by storm-driven waves is high, especially for the village and the FAA facilities, which are on the narrow spit of land between Norton Sound and Kouwegok Slough. Drinking water in Unalakleet is provided by a public system that collects water from an infiltration gallery near Powers Creek. Local alternative sources of drinking water may not be available because they are difficult to access, have an inadequate quantity, or are affected by salt water. More distant alternatives may be available from the South River or perhaps from Coral or Ryan Lakes if they are deep enough. Data, however, are not adequate to determine if these alterna tive sources provide enough water to meet the needs of Unalakleet or if they meet current drinking- water regulations.
REFERENCES CITED
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, 1995, Alaska water-quality standards 18 AAC 70: Juneau, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Water-Quality Management Section, 47 p. Brower, W.A. Jr., Diaz, H.F., Prechtel, A.S. Searby, H.W. and Wise, J.L., 1977, Climatic atlas of the outer continental shelf waters and coastal regions of Alaska Volume II, Bering Sea: University of Alaska, Anchorage, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center, Publication B-77,443 p. Cass, J.T., 1959, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Unalakleet quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Miscel laneous Geologic Investigations Map 1-288, scale 1:250,000. Ecology and Environment, Inc., 1992, Environmental compliance investigation report, Unalakleet FAA Station, Unalakleet Alaska: Anchorage [Copy available through the Environmental Compliance Section AAL-465, Fed eral Aviation Administration, Alaskan Region], variously paged. Environmental Services, Ltd., 1980, Bering Straits Region community profiles A background for planning: Anchor age, Alaska Department of Regional and Community Affairs, 18 sheets.
SUMMARY 7 Ferrians, O.J., Jr., 1965, Permafrost map of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map 1-445,1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Hartman, C.W., and Johnson, P.R., 1984, Environmental atlas of Alaska: University of Alaska Fairbanks, Institute of Water Resources/Engineering Experiment Station, 95 p. Lamke, R.D., 1979, Flood characteristics of Alaskan streams: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 78-129, 61 p. Leslie, L.D., 1989, Alaska climate summaries (2d ed.): University of Alaska Anchorage, Arctic Environmental Infor mation and Data Center, Climate Center Technical Note 5. Patton, W.W.J., and Moll, E.J., 1985, Geologic map of northern and central parts of Unalakleet quadrangle, Alaska.: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1749, scale 1:250,000. Rieger, Samuel, Schoephorster, D.B., and Furbush, C.E., 1979, Exploratory soil survey of Alaska: Soil Conservation Service report, 213 p. Selkregg, L.L., 1976, Alaska regional profiles Northwest Region: University of Alaska Fairbanks, Arctic Environ mental and Data Center, 265 p. Sloan, C.E., Kernodle, D.R., and Huntsinger, R., 1986, Hydrologic reconnaissance of the Unalakleet River basin, Alaska, 1982-83: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4089,18 p. Solley, W.B., Pierce, R.R., and Perlman, H.A., 1993, Estimated use of water in the United States in 1990: U.S. Geo logical Survey Circular 1081,76 p. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1990a, Environmental assessment Department of Defense Environmental Restora tion Program Unalakleet Aircraft and warning site, Alaska: Anchorage, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, 54 p. 1990b, Environmental assessment Department of Defense Environmental Restoration Program, Unalakleet- North River White Alice communication site, Alaska: Anchorage, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska Dis trict, variously paged. 1991a, Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact Department of Defense Environmen tal Restoration Program, aircraft and warning site, Unalakleet, Alaska: Anchorage, U.S. Army Corps of Engi neers, Alaska District, variously paged. 1991b, Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact Department of Defense Environmen tal Restoration Program, North River White Alice communication site, Unalakleet, Alaska: Anchorage, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, 1 v., variously paged. -1993, Alaskan communities flood hazard data: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District, Flood Plain Management Services report, 335 p. U.S. Bureau of Census, 1991, Percent distribution Alaska population by sex, race and Hispanic origin 1990 census: U.S. Bureau of Census report compiled by Alaska Department of Labor, Research and Analysis, 3 p. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, 1983, River management plan for the Unalakleet National Wild River: U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Anchorage District Office, 34 p. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, 1987, Sole source aquifer designation Petitioner guidance: U.S. Environ mental Protection Agency report, 30 p. 1995, Drinking water regulations and health advisories: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency report, May 1995, 11 p. Viereck, L.A., and Little, E.L. Jr., 1972, Alaska trees and shrubs: U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 410, 265 p. Waller, R.M., 1958, Ground-water reconnaissance of Koyuk and Shaktolik villages, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Data Report 7,10 p. Williams, J.R. 1970, Ground water in permafrost regions of Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 696, 83 p. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1985, Field inspection report Defense environmental restoration account, Unalakleet Alaska sites: Anchorage, Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 92 p.
8 Overview of Environmental and Hydrogeologic Conditions at Unalakleet, Alaska APPENDIX 1
WELL-DRILLERS' LOGS
(Data from the files of the U.S. Public Health Service)
APPENDIX A-1
WELL LOG
U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH
1 -OCATION DATE STARTED /- 3 DATE COMPLETED /' DRILLER /77/7/Vf f" fir-lT) f A r/
TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL ^.? FT CASING INSTALLED. DIAMETER
GROUT_____/!/ /? SCREEN SI7F >3//7______MFG. . LENGTH.^
STATIC WATER LEVEI ~7 FT* HRS. PUMPED GPM DRAWDOWN FT. --« I? HOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. FEET THAWED_3_ BOTTOM OF FROST & MATERIAL^? SEASONAL OR PERMA FROST ''"*
WATER DATA FIELD TEST TASTE ______APPEARANCE FRESH jrrf AFTER 24 HOURS___ /'// I IRON ______/ CH LOR I D ES, TDS
PUMP TEST _^ - STATIC LEVEL
PUMPING LEVEL /J/# GPM AFTER ///y HRS.
HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE WITH ^ TIDES . x/7 QR FROST/LZL
DEVELOP PROCEDURE _:
ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING. HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB
CREW WELL LOG
U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE. DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH
jCATION DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED. DRILLER TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL. id. .FT. CASING INSTALLED DIAMETER GROUT .SCREEN SI7F /l/>7______MFG. .LENGTH
STATIC WATER LEVEL HRS. PUMPED GPM DRAWDOWN FT.
HOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. -. ^ JFEET THAWED * ° * * BOTTOM OF FROST & MATERIAL _~_ SEASONAL OR PERMA FROST /°<
WATER DATA FIELD TEST TASTE ______APPEARANCE FRESH AFTER 24 HOURS IRON CHLORIDES, TDS ____
PUMP TEST STATIC LEVEL
PUMPING LEVEL. @______GPM AFTER _____L_HRS.
HIGHEST RECOMMEND WILL STATIC LEVEL TIDES______Oft F
DEVELOP PROCEDURE
:STIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING. HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB
CREW WELL LOG
U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH .3 :-'.- JCATION - ^ -77 DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED. DRILLER FT. CASING INSTALLED *T 5 DIAMETER SCREEN SIZE MFG.MA. . LENGTH > STATIC WATER LEVEL HRS. PUMPED GPM DRAWDOWN/* FT.
HOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. x / FEET THAWED O 3 M <. k'fi ^ BOTTOM OF FROST & MATERIAL/^* \s SEASONAL OR PERMA FROST 3-7' £tt c "' WATER DATA FIELD TEST ~*> *" TASTE . 0^^aWMMW*** 1 " ' Vfllotd ' APPEARANCE FrVpf 11
/^ f> rt\ AFTER 24 HOURS/ 1 / Lf ' I * IRON j /" 7 / __ , r.",:: CHLORIDES y 1 -. . Q THS * /I *J- - SET PUMP TEST i . Fl*1 - STATIC LEVEI ^ -^ i / fT 3 B^& PUMPINfi 1 FVFI /]'/ ® GPM c~/^y AFTER /MRS - HIGHEST RECOMMEI^ED^JMP RATE WILL STATIC LEVE4jcH^N E WITH TIDES /OR FROST / '
DEVELOP PROCEDURE ( ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING. HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB
CREW WELL LOG
U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE. DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH
JCATION DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED. -/o-77 DRILLER TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL ___ FT. CASING INSTALLED DIAMETER
GROUT SCREEN SIZE //>?______MFfi LENGTH
STATIC WATER LEVEL HRS. PUMPED .@ GPM DRAWDOWN FT.
HOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FEET THAWED */4 Sfa ^ BOTTOM OF FROST IT MATERIAL S SEASONAL OR PERMA FROST 3'-'7"
WATER DATA FIELD TEST TASTE ______APPEARANCE FRESH AFTER 24 HOURS L IRON CHLORIDES, TDS
PUMP TEST - STATIC LEVEL PUMPING LEVEJ @______GPM AFTER ff ' HRS.
HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE WITH TIDES______OR FROST__
DEVELOP PROCEDURE
ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING. HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB
CREW WELL LOG
U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH
h * DATE STARTED ~ / ' DATE COMPLETED. - / £7 - 7 7 DRILLER TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL 3 & FT. CASING INSTALLED DIAMETER GROUT______/>»//S£REEN SIZE . LENGTH __
STATIC WATER LEV HRS. PUMPE DRAW DO FT.
HOLE DIAMETER DEPTH Wr^VOI \\ \J L/IAMVIt. 1 I-H FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. y' - f ' FEET THAWED 4. ^ 1 *t/ ' X ( RfYTTnM DF FROST & MATERIAL gVT^^^ Stint? ^ ' r- ' / f SEASONAL OR PERMA FROST . 7 ^ \^ -4*/ / ' -* ^T/P^*?. -^ ^/trF CM/ ^« ' J?' ^T^S^c) v/fW/T X77- /£' < zo' y*//**J C/^v t WATER DATA FIELD TEST -/ - 32 S//7> S/^/^^Y^ TASTE £/M t/< / APPEARANCE FRESH T/fa/ft k/*-ftt ~j/!/Ttt ' IY) ) 1~7'/ Jyi/7" / /1//r /J S AFTER 94 HfHJRS >j IRON £ //^/ "7%; */ ' /<*S*. > -/^^^' lJ#f*/{ PHI nRirtcc , r^7\? c^ gL^* C/A/ /^ THS ^ f> t3 /? PUMP TEST - STATIC LEVEL PUMPINR 1 FVF| © GPM AFTER HRS. HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE WITH TIDES OR FROST DEVELOP PROCEDURE -\ ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB CREW WELL LOG U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH -? .^CATION £W/?/ #%Lil7-foW$ftS C/?< *K M*//A?& ^DATE STARTED _2_ DATE COMPLETED ? 2> / 12* H ~l______HRIU PR /7?/?/?tf J^Sf/l/tPM .,' TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL FT. CASING INSTALLED^ DIAMETER GROUT SCREEN SIZE MFG. LENGTH STATIC WATER LEVEL HRS. PUMPED .@ GPM DRAWDOWN FT. HOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. FEET THAWED___ BOTTOM OF FROST & MATERIAL SEASONAL OR PERMA EROST WATER DATA FIELD TEST TASTE ______APPEARANCE FRESH. AFTER 24 HOURS___ IRON ______CHLORIDES. TDS ____ PUMP TEST - STATIC LEVEL PUMPING LEVEL ______GPM AFTER ______HRS. HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE WITH TIDES______OR FROST_____ DEVELOP PROCEDURE ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING. HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB CREW WELL LOG U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE. DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH S-/4-77 C fiHL ET-/oU>£*S. rtf STARTED DATE C OMPLETED 3-X/-7 7 DRILLER S?7/?#l< /9/i/oc/rsos/ ' TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL / # FT. CASING INSTALLED ft,//*!? niAMFTFR -to GROUT 4 / £CREEN SIZE MFC /V j LENGTH ;/? / /7 /X/7 A// /y//7 STATIC WATER LEVEl/*V/ K1RS PUMPEn '' © GPM DRAWDOWN x FT. HOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. FEET THAWED BOTTOM OF FROST & MATERIAL SEASONAL OR PERMA EROST_±L WATER DATA FIELD TEST TASTE APPEARANCE FRESH .A AFTER 24 HOURS ///// .RHM ////7 CHLORIDES:______ PUMP TEST /?/ // - STATIC LEVEL PUMPING LEVEL @______GPM AFTER HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE TIDES OR FROST DEVELOP PROCEDURE ,-y'J^ '^ ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING. HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB CREW I WELL LOG U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH )oCATION DATE COMPLETED 3^/7- 77 ______DRILLER TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL FT CASING INSTALLED DIAMETER GROUT SCREEN SIZE MFC LENGTH f^'-f STATIC WATER LEVEL HRS. PUMPED. GPM DRAWDOWN FT. HOLE DIAMETEl CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION tf'-a 1 SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. FEET THAWED ___ BOTTOM OF FROST & MATERIAL &KM*> -S'«=>*si«$ti SEASONAL OR PERMA FROST $<* 5 * ^/,^/y $ WATER DATA FIELD TEST ' TASTE APPEARANCE FRESH AFTER 24 HOURS___ IRON ______CHLORIDES: TDS ____ PUMP TEST __ - STATIC LEVEL PUMPING LEVEL ___ ;T HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE - WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE TIDES______OR FROS DEVELOP PROCEDURE JTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB CREW WELL LOG U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE. DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH //? -t?r»ATC>ATE STARTEDCTADTCr\ ^) " / / " /I DATE COMPLETED. - / Ci ' 7 7 DRILLER >?/S/,? /? TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL. FT. CASING INSTALLER /> DIAMETER T GROUT______.SCREEN SIZE MFG.. . LENGTH __ STATIC WATER LEVEL HRS. PUMPED. GPM DRAWDOWN FT. HOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. FEET THAWED___ BOTTOM OF FROST & MATERIAL SEASONAL OR PERMA FROST WATER DATA FIELD TEST TASTE ______APPEARANCE FRESH. AFTER 24 HOURS___ IRON ______CHLORIDES,. TDS ____ PUMP TEST - STATIC LEVEL PUMPING LEVEL ____ >______GPM AFTER ______HRS. HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE WITH TIDES______OR FROST_____ DEVELOP PROCEDURE ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING. HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB CREW WELL LOG U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH - C /?*<% »U/*~H &2 < 7 DATE STARTED ./// i>#0#w c/c^y RnTTOM OF FROST & MATERIAL ^^ ^T X ^ / / f ^/3,/fJ mj /"/?<" t/t/ / SEASONAL OR-PERMA FROST V'- -/i^ L « »>St f?fC /* X >7 r7 - /£ y*-i/ci*) £ Axy . ** * 3 - tf Si***, c /*y-T>* WATER DATA FIELD TEST ~« ^ ^ \ / C^* * A//**y £A/ f TASTE o -» ' . c //?/ s^r c^iTTy* / - N HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE 'V y^fl 3 /L o,' .7 < -/:« A/,^ /^/r WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE WITH . TIDES OR FROST ». DEVELOP PROCEDURE _^ ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB CREW WELL LOG U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE. DIVISION OF INDIAN HEALTH -77 JcATION DATE COMPLETED TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL FT. CASING INSTALLED DIAMETER s-> x> GROUT SCREEN SIZE MFG. .LENGTH r STATIC WATER LEVEL HRS. PUMPED. GPM DRAWDOWN FT. HOLE DIAMETER CASING DIAMETER DEPTH FORMATION SOIL DATA TO 15 FT. FEET THAWED___ FROST & MATERIAL SEASONAL OR PER MA RROST WATER DATA FIELD TEST TASTE APPEARANCE FRESH AFTER 24 HOURS___ IRON ______CHLORIDES,. TDS ____ PUMP TEST - STATIC LEVEL PUMPING LEVE ______GPM AFTER HIGHEST RECOMMENDED PUMP RATE WILL STATIC LEVEL CHANGE WITI TIDES______OR 7~& DEVELOP PROCEDURE / ESTIMATED MAN HOURS FOR DRILLING HOURS FOR TOTAL JOB CREW APPENDIX 2 GROUND WATER (Data from the files of the U.S. Geological Survey) APPENDIX A-2 9-185 UNITED STATES ^~" 9-185 UNITED STATES (October 1950) (October 1950) DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION WATER RESOURCES DIVISION WELL SCHEDULE WELL SCHEDULE Field No. Date ..t Record by Office No Record by . Office No.._. Source of data ...Gfeh=fe>.'_ ^...?..._...... j. 1. Location: State . .... County. _ .... 1. Location: State--_-_££__4.--Ij-i--_-_-_----- County. w Map. Map __.__...... __.... _ N E rp N E -H_ _ M_- - Q .____ S_f sec. _. -» JL -r-n-i-Tii---____-r- Q W ,_>/ ° 2. 2. Owner: jJ^..&£.._.^.-__.._...._____ Address Z62& Tenant... . ______,._ Address _....._____ Tenant _. Address ...... ___.... Driller._.._._.. _.______..__ Address ....______Driller ______.__...__ Address ... 3. Topography... 3. Topography . 4. Elevation ______1 ..,., 4. Elevation.....xx ______...s ft.^ £Telow _. 5. Type: Vw----"^^(Dug^driUed^driveji,bored, **y ""sc "" jetted.__.19_. 5. Tj/pe.UDu.gj drilledt^riv6^, bored, jetted ___19.__ 6. Depth: Rept. ~*3..Q...... ft. Meas...... __.____ft. 6. Depth: Rept. ._j_2____?____... ft. Meas. ______ft. __i...... 7. Casing: Diam. in., to ___ in., Type ___ 7. Casing: Diam. _.. in., to ___ in., Type ._ j Depth ____ ft., Finish ______Depth.. ft., Finish i 8. Chief Aquifer __._..______. From _ .ft. to...... ft. 8. Chief Aquifer .__ ...... ___ From ft. to ft. Others ______above 9. Water level _ _£_.___.___ ft. ______19. " below 9. Water level ...J_-.._ _. ft. meP£ .______19._. J^JJ______. ______.______which is _._ ft. ®DOVe surface 10. Pump: Type _ . __..__;___'_ Capacity ______. G. M..__.__.... 10. Pump: Type _ _.___.....______Capacity ______G. M. _.._.. . Power: Kind ...... __...... Horsepower ___.. .____ Power: Kind ..._.. _.___..._____ Horsepower 11. Yield: Flow _..._...... G. M., Pump __/__6 ._ G. M., Meas., Rept. Est..__._._._. 11. Yield: Flow...._...._._ G. M.t Pump _____ G.M.,Meas.,Rept.Est.____ Drawdown ______!_ ft. after...____ hours pumping ______.___ G. M. Drawdown ____ ft. after ______hours pumping. ...._ G. M. 12. Use: Dom., Stock, PS., RR., Ind., Irr., Obs. _____.____...... _.__. 12. Use: Dom., Stock, PS., RR., Ind., Irr., Obs. ______..._ Adequacy, permanence ______...__.______Adequacy, permanence ______...._._.____...... ____ ._____ 13. Quality.______Temp______°F. 13. Quality...... ______Temp ______°F. Taste, odor, color ______Sample YesXT ______Taste, odor, color ______Sample Unfit for.....__...... Unfit for.__... __..._...... _...._._.__._.______.. 14. Remarks: (Log, Analyses, etc.) ______14. Remarks: (Log, Analyses, etc.) ______,_ U. *. GOVERNMENT NINTINa OfFICI 16 63891-1 U. ». 60VIRNMCNT NINTINfl OFFICE 1ft 62801-1 r (oJbfiwo) UNITED STATES (Octot^wso) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY . GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION WATER RESOURCES DIVISION WELL SCHEDULE . WELL SCHEDULE ^^ ^j TiAfA JF ^'^ /* £' & 10 MaMNV* *' Date ~.^.*js£,S~J'-'? - ... .,..,- ,._ .- ,10 W«MW_i_ ..,, ft** * hy ._0,JfcdPM<0 Offi««*r« Record \* jfL&tfi'*'* - ... . Office No. Source of data ,L lj Location: State C<*<&!!L&&S./i/i / _. County __ .'IJ.&\ E/ : 1: Location: State ,,..,.. ir^f^^^.^-r' .. bounty ...... Jill...... Map ...... Map, E _____ }£ _____ ^ Bec. _____ T ______q R ______E Tenant ... ___ . Address ... . Tenant L£JI££. *f, ^r^-Tf 'rlfAL. Address ...... Driller .. ^~^ ^ « .. -~ ... ^ -. Addr*«« Driller . ______. Address __ ___ ..... W* * Vffvy * **tslmy !1 3; TopographyIT * IT a ...... _ ...... A 777~,^^v« M above 4. Elevation... _ _ft.?bove __ _ -- below 5. Type: Dug, drilled, driven, bored, jetted ...... 19. . 5. Type: Dug, drilled, driven, bored, jetted... 19 _ . ft, TfeyrfV Rppt. _..££/£ _._. , , ft. M«"A«, , -' - -«- | 6. Depth: Rept. c-^Z ___ ft. Meas. ._. __ . _ ft. 7. Casing: Diam.__£2;__.in.,to--- in., Type ...... !. 7^ Casing: Diam. ...jl:.. in., to ._.._. in., Type __ ' " """"" _|_ i ' Depth. _ -_ ft.. Finish- ______«. CM^AyA^. V ...... ft. to_ _ft. 8. Chief Aquifer. .From ft. to ft, ftf.T,PPS ' Others . _ 0 nr/rf^ZtMZ ft rept. 10 above 9. Water Iwl .. .. ,...tt.*fP*- 10 above m-TiirtTi f« w nrfo<"A ...... ---...... _ which in ....___. ft. t_ i surface 10: Pump: Type ...... ,.,.,.. ,,, Capacity,, .,.....-._.. G. M...... 10; Pump: Type .Capacity G.M.. T>nwA«> TT*«/i TTr>T«£.Tv->TrroT Power: Kind ...... _ . ... _. Horsepower _ _ ..__ .. _._ . 11. Yield: Flow _____ G. M., Pump . _____ . G. M., Meas., Rep t.Est. 11- Yield: Flow. .. _G.M.,Pump__ .. . G.M., Meas., Rept. Est. ... Drawdown. ft. after hours pumping . ____ QP j^ Drawdown ____ ft. after ______hours pumping ______G. M. 12. Use: igmjstock, PS., RR., Ind., Irr., Obs...... - __ - 12. Z7ae{^onu/Btock, PS., RR., Ind., Irr., Obs. . ____ . ^-*..i-**^ Adequacy, permanence ____ .... ____ . .______Adequacy, permanence ______13. Quality ______.. ______Temp _^»~._ op 13. Quality ______. _ _ Temp ... __ ...°F. fxe Taste, odor, color ______.. Sample ^ ^^/f'j? j . .. '/.... ';, - '' Taste, odor, color ...... _...... SampleA IE?JNC*^^f' TTnfit. fnr n , _.._,. ,^ T ^^'(H^-^S. £> o 4 ^ Unfit for * f^zf",?>-ft /In 14. Remark*: (Log, Analyses, etc.) __ _ 14. Remark*: (Log, Analyra, «te.) ,.T__^._~ _,_ .r .u._, ,__ ,_r i i U. *. GOVERNMENT PHINTINa OFFICE 1ft 02801-1 U. *. OVUNMCNT MINTIMO OFFICI 1ft 03801-1 /iV WRD EX?. (GwjT^rfi rwCe Mawe*, Well. No. U^dJ?**^ April 1966 WELL SCHEDULE U. S. DEPT. OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION r*^V*/ &/**& f MASTER CARD fi Sourc e ^ Record by of da ta Date **rAvT^/^y^ » ° ^ f'c. State ( ! | (or town) f^f\s t &JLSJ*~^ti^g 4.ji Latitude: [ | .{. | Nq Longitude: 1| !| , ! 1 ! 1 number: | | dec 7 mm 9 sec " 12 degrees i 5 min sec U 19 Lat-long 1 H N ' E accuracy; L70J T. S. R u. Sec . i, II |i well number: I 3| ! ! ! ! 3J ! 1 1 1 Uao-l I 1 i 1 number: (" - ,. . i j i i 1 Owner C r- r ^ "N 1 /) lA Local use: 1 i i ' mL J i L 43 J I I I L,,J o rname:Vr^>J>/ | ft TTT >* Owner or name: |_ i , I i ! i 1 Address: S2 56 61 «« / (C) (F) (M) (N) (P) (S) (W) 1 I A Ownership; County, Fed Gov't, City, Corp or Co, Private, State Agency, Water Dist *'| | <. (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (H) (I) (M) (N) (P) (R) Use of Air cond, Bottling, Comm, Dewa ter, Power, Fire, Dom, Irr, Med, Ind, P s i Rcc f ^^^- (S) (T) (D) (V) (W) ' (X) (Y) Stock, Instit, Unused, Repressilire, Recharge, Desal-P S, Desal-other . ^ «n Use of (A) (D) (G) (H) (*) (P) (R) (T) (U) (W) (X) (2) 1 I well: Anode. Drain. Seismic. Heat Re 9, Obs, Oil-gas, Recharge, Test, Unused, Withdraw, Waste, Destroyed 1 1 DATA AVAILABLE: Well data! 1 Freq. W/L meas.: 1 ___1 Field aquifer char. 1___ 1 70 Hyd. lab. data; -n Qual. water data; type: A 1 yes Frecj. sampling: a Pumpage inventory: no , period: y*l 1 75 yes ^1 | Aperture cards: Log data: WELL-DESCRIPTION CARD Meas. 24| IsAME AS ON MASTER CARD ] Depth well: ft 1 ; i i Depth cased: [ J J Caslna (first perf.} ft 1 ! ! , type: ; Diam. ir ' 1 25 (C) (F> (G) (H) (4>) (P) (S) (T) (W) (X) (2) I I ir-; n4ok. porous gravel w. gravel w. horiz. open perf., screen, sd. p t., shored, open ( ^ j^j Finish: concrete, (perf.) , fscreen) , gallery, end, Method (A) (B) (C) (D) (H) (J) (P) (R) (T) (V) (W) (2) I I Drilled- air bored, cable, dug, hyd jetted, air reverse trenching , driven, drive 1 1 percussion, rotary, uuuu, other Date 1 1 Drilled: 1 ! ! Pump intake setting:. £f l i : 1 33 35 36 31 Driller: it f,. name f,\ ^.v address _ , ijllL /A\ /u\ fr>\ /t\ ' \nJ fW\ fV\ fH\ fC ) (T) (8) DeeP "7(type); N air,* ' Lbucket, '?' cent,(C' jet,*J' multiple,(cent ) multiple.(turbT) nooe* "' » Pi'ton,iFJ rot,l ' subnif erg, turb, other | 1 Shallow 1 1 39 40 Power nfll- LP irans. or (type); diesel, elec, gas, gasoline, h and, gas, wind; H.P. n meter no. , above j Descrip. MP ft ^1^f.LSD '. Alt. MP ! I'jj Accuracy; Alt. LSD: ! i ! i 1 (source) -a Water above " above III! Level ft HOI , MP; F t belowu-i_. LSD I___l1 1 L__l_Ac curacy: S2 1 Date 1 i : J meas: 5311 'i 1" Yield: gpmj__ ! ! ! ! 1 determined Lf,J 1 ] Pumping 1 j J 1 j Drawdown: ft J_ [ ! J Accuracy: 1 1 period hr»!_. j. 1 In * i QUALITY OF r^- I *4 1 1 *S WATER DATA: Iron 1 Jsulfate 1 1 Chloride L-JHard. L^J Sp. Conduct K x 10 1 1 Temp. *FI I i 1 sampled | | , , 1 ' 73 74 76 77 7V Taste, color, etc. Well No. N Latitude-longitude i S , i d m s d m s HYDROGEOLOGIC CARD SAME AS ON MASTER CARDJ Province- 1 1 Section: 1 '" ' zo 2I 1 1 Drainage 1 I i 1 1 ' 1 Easin- 1 i i J Subbasin: 171 22 ?3 .25 (D) (C) (E) (F) (H) (K) (L) Topo of dep cession, stream channel, dunes, flat, hilltop, sink, swamp, well site: ( ) (P) (S) (T) (0) 00 off >a MAJOR AQUIFER: 1 : 1 system series 2* 2» aquifer, formtit ion, group 1 so 's31 uifer Lithology: 1 ,, ! . , 1 Origin: | | Tllickness: ft 32 3J 34 1 i i well open to: f t | M ! i JOJ top of: «IJ i«l 35 37 MINOR AQUIFER: 1 i 1 i i i 8ys tem series 44 4S aquifer, formal:ion, .group 4* * 7 uifer Lithology: L jr Orl«ln: 1 1 »lickness-: ft Length of (ill Dei>Ll' L° 1 ''i ''1_ well open to: f t 1 i i 1 top of: . «l i : 51 53 57 59 Intervals Screened: "1 1 Depth to consolidated rock- ft 1 . J ', ~] Source of data: Depth to basement: f t 1 ! ! 1 Source of data: "d 65 «8 Surficial J 1 Infiltration material: L jo-i-71 J characteristics: -a Coefficient " j " -'! Coefficient Trans: i i __J Storage: . .__ I "» !.. 0 L-T.-J- ______l__ '"..J Coefficient 2 1 f Perm: Rpd/ft ; Spec cap: gpm/ft; Number of geologic cards:. 1 1 79 . . *^ A t* G> f i ^'.V * 0jf t / *A> , / Y c c &/*/\ /**y T - 1 _ _ .. *y^ GPO 857-700 1GW ANALYTICAL NOTES Location 71^"tll A. ^ » ^ W SCI^ » ^ County Source T>pop "W^IT : ' Depth (ft) Diam (in.) C<,,^ t" (f 0 Date drilled Point" of coll. Pumt) HOUS6 #1 f - - -- .- . -- - 4- -Owner 71 8th A. C . &W. Sqd. (USAF) "< Tr«fltment < ; " * Use Domestic WBF WL 17« Yield i ; Temp (° F) Appear, w.c. r^fl^f* ., , ; C0H^-J ll-lQ-<7 ' - -; By I S/Sgt. Steele ^ Remarks "; » . . _.. . , J .._...... ,. . .L / « -' " ""' '' ' ^DDPiy^ epm , ,li: . . i oom/ epm -./ cm" x- ;/ ^ ^^r Ljf aiO2- ' 3 ml " .Hco.j ^ - ~ :&&> mi .-» /^.*-/ 5^ ^ 1 -- - - /? »« y a" 4 ' AV ^ ml \ Abs.(AUFe> ^fctf^ir _ _, mi ^^ y jf Abs.(Fe) " / #s**^c*> ''\ Fe, ------^5" ml - 6~cr& - Abs. ^?*^;. - «^?O UnrtU -- ml t - Mtstd //^yw , /^i" ^y^'*' "3^0 F^ /^-^ 2-^ i 0^'* ' ' - _ - 'if "- - Ahf. -Sw*?/> ' «^«» ) Ml «* Mn ml *' Cf Abs. Ml std / - .. V , ..,..-* . --^. -...-.. .. . ^ ml Cl ^,/j . I*) ml 2,<5 -. s . .- . - . . . S^-/ . ,...... / r ml F /^ ml £> t> >£rt> ..... Ml .td V-^7 .. .- , . . _.. . . , - / ^ V /./& ml ...... ,,...... - ^ V Ma . 5^> ml /..^ ml 'l^7 .- '.-,'/::.:- J ...... ^ V .**' NO, 2.6 m | ^0 x w - Ml std ml ; '' ----, , , ml Lbb. No. Col- 4343 Field No. R No. H r 7$ Z o 0 a Hardness as CaCO. Dissolved Solids tf 0* C/l er n I2. ya 0 o o 9 * 1 M * M M n o a. S. a. a. o 51 3 a- $ M ?* S^ o .3 O °\ 1° o »*i a.O !T 5'a. 3' Oo oa to «a o o o o < < \ to to 3 \ ^ ^ ^ f o \f\ o OK ' 3 *s V k X. o . o V. °\ 3 \ N \ V V o 73 70 n n "ff X a 3 o X o 1 . - o O_ IT o n 05;" 2. s. X o .- \ gchecked checked 2. \ V o'3 3 M o £; a TJ O a. 5: 09 3_ X L L o o 3 V? O - a N! N o R: 3 I \ \ \J \ s 4 N] 1GW ANALYTICAL Lnentinn 71 8th A? -G - &W. .County. Source___Storage Tank Depth (ft)._____Diom (in.). Cosed to (ft). .Dote drilled. Pointof coll. Owner Treatment. Use__ WBF___ WLT Yield Temp (° F). __ Appear. w.c. Clear~"T Collected- .19,57 " : -By. Remarks -WU em 7 Si02 mi .J. Abs. Al Abi.(AUFe) ^> Abi.(Fe) OH -ml Ml std Fe,. Abi._ ^ / Ml «td. sov ^r Mn, Oi** +*w /r? Ab«._ Ml std ml Cl ml ml 0cO Ml «td Ca 0 ml -23 ml Ifa / Mg TO ml ml '.&*-J£* / .ml ,£*> Ml c»d -ml .ml Lob. No. CoU V3 Field No. R No. Lab: No. Col- ppm epm y ppm epm N« ...... ?-?': ^?* / 6 _ .._ -...... m| Reading Avg ! . ' , ' ' «td 100 Samole 4 2" C _____ std ______> ^ / .*** K ^/ m( Readfng Avg ...... ___ «»d 100 - ^ " SampU ^' $~ ____ std ____ . .____ . _____ | i .- ml ml _.-. .:.- ...... ,. _ ...... \ .,.-1 / Total cations /.JT7 x Total anions J.X7 ^ / Total ions, epm f ' Difference, epm. Percent difference J. 0. O ppm Specific Conductance (micromhos at 25 C) ,-,*/ P If Cl 3^^ R ««» pH 7* ^ ' / Color 2. £~ Sum to-^' ~o ^ Residue on evap. at 180° C «/> ml Dissolved ...... , . -- By Date M 8o Analyzed /i'/>'6'7 U ___ , />72. :.#* M O /"% sS fa Cak. checked (_*» & >O /Z.- /F-_? M ^fgft / IA / /y o -A s1 Reviewed / t^/^/%^ /J~J0-J~? 0 X" Noncarbonate 6 Reviewed Typed fifa^< ,^^f : Typing checked ^$f%^ J***^ ^?*^ ) J^ 1GW ANALYTICAL NOTES - ft- ft J__County. Source ____TM fipftngqT*y Depth (ft). Diam (in.). Cased to (ft). Date drilled Point of coll.. Owner Treatment. Use WBF___ WL Yield Temp(° F). Collected _ By S/Sgt. Pasbbig Remark s -WU ppm eom / HCO Si0 2 ml to Abs. 1r4* Al Abs.(AUP«) ml Ab«.(Fe) 1 Ab«._ OH -ml' Ml std Abs.. Ml std. Mn, ml + '°fff Abs._ .cz* Ml std ml Cl 0-°). / . ml ml 0,0 MI / Ca m| ml ml -A ml Ml std -ml .ml Lab. No. Col- Field No. R No. Lab. No. Col- ppm , epm ; ppm epm J ^ No 33" , Reading Avg - -; std 100 ; Sample *H*O ' s x- K & ( ¥ / «» Reading Avg std ^100 ...... . ml ml ...... -...... \ i m| .... Tola (cations 23* / Total onions A 12.' Total ions, epm. 78 Difference, epm. Percent difference - X ppm Specific Conductance (micromhos at.25 C) nf s p *n 3?^P p ^ pH 7.*" y Color 2^0 ,/ Sum J&3 /O^ oIft ^ Residue on evap. at 180° C «/> ml Dissolvec * By Date CO 8 Analyzed J ml /,72^ ..!&*. yj /z -a" 7 M o jz.-te-*. M ^ -^J^6 ^ Cak. checked C*t/3 ft / // 8}& QO o Reviewed ^^^.^ X^jl//?^ /<£ ^jd^fj X Noncorbonate t> * Reviewed Typed X^v, / ^-^^6!" ; Typing checked Lornfirm Jl fit. h A. C. & W. Sqd . .- County Source * Depth (ft) Diom (in.) Cti^Mft) Dote drilled Point of coll. Kitchen Owner . Treatment ' ': Use WB.F : WL Yield Temp (° F) Appear, wx. ' "'eVeST11'" : " " * Colhi-t-'i 11-1Q-*? - v By S'/Sgt. Pasbrlp . > Remarks I/ t ...... 1.. ..,_. , _ ,...,.... __ i... . " ppw/ epm ' * »«' ' ft - -? oom- > ep m / Sib 2 - - - ~- -f ml II *\ HCO . -.. - i^.^.'ml-.. ___ ._//l-.^j.> IrVO ^ Abs. 4 /*7^ Kf?T*-"lf* jl. --Jk » -ji^^-W.- Vi^--1I*»;:\JS*»iaS»M«St»ftxi^!«VSri*«PI|«»Ii«»«» ~~T~ - 2. ^ V^i^ *s f " AlA 1 ~ . *^l Abs.(Al+FeV T^Q^j ,ml ^l «-^ i Abi.(Fe) ; / Fe, 2-i*" ml O.ll i Abs. t C ~* $ rtU - ~| ,- --- »- > Ml std i P. m| - : . -.. . - Abt. Ml >td SO 2^ ml ^^ , 6 y ml ^ d/ Abs. . .«. .*T : Ml std -s ml Cl «/j ^,5 ml *2.«0 ' n M5,^ ml F A* ml ^'^> Ml «td S.^5" / / Ca $ & ml ^ ' ml s^^ - - ..'"-.. Mq fTO ml 7-r' ,t>l r ml ^ ______/ V -ml NO^ 2-6^^1 ^, Ml std .. ml , ..... H Lob. No. Col- V3^/ Field No. R No. Lab. No. Col- ppmy epm /r- ppm epm *./'/'' Na .:. ... - .- - 3r3 ...... - m| . . Reading Avg .«td 100 Samp l« 49.0 - ' flj __ y - . .. / y K ^O^ ,trO ' m» Readi'ng Avg : : «td loo . .. Sample *** & . ' ______.-.--. w...... -,.-,.-. - . . - -...-. ,. i ' ' . - m 1 ml - - - - ... .,,.-.. mf "~"'s s r Total cations l.to Total onions I.XI f i Percent difference____ & 3 ppm Specific Conductance (micromho* at. 25° C) JS*0 no PH 7.y Color "2^O / *s Sum -oI/I TJ Residue on evop. at 180° C «/> oil Dissolvec ...... y Date r» 8o Analyzed ,*-/*-; 6-7 U ______ml / fm If 7^ i/i o Cak. checked (ZcStf J* - /-?- ^ M /, . .-. -CTo^? -, y lA / A^ U ** ^2^7 »~2st £ o Reviewed . / * O'' Typed $2^. / " (y ~^ o Typing checked x^^ /-^-T? 02- 1GW NALYJJCAL^OTES- ^ 1 j Abjua c :..i".r-roq .County;. Source f?r* *i fft o s. /y & '. j/V J*L s. ±* . Depth iam (in.) .Date drilled. Poin-tof- coll.-- Owner v-,-- ' -i' - Treatment, --- i- WBJ=I wi._. Yield Temp (° F). .Appear. w.c.. Collected. -By Remarks ~fa/e,,^ Sfe/iccv rJt -"» 1 V J>s. A«! ml .A& C0 . ....i/ ml jS&LJS't \ Ml std ** -& ,3-90 . Ml .td 4 W\ Wn,- //in ml Abi. &.Q Ml std O* c " ml Ca ml /, ml -r^.:^ /y.y ml .ml '3 Ai Ml std. Lab. No. CoI- Field No. R No. epm epm N< Reading Avg 100 Sample 73PT" .* ^Ayg £?&_£. *--f - »- * -- * Sample ___ V- std l^f ml Total cations Total onions i r _.. ,._ Percent difference . "...... ppm - - r. . . . Specific Conductance / (mieromhos at 25° C) . £4^> ^e/ - ... pH -7.X .. f> , : .. Color £&=& /&& - .... ,. . - , ,.j. Sum ...... - o «/>-T Residue on evap. at 180° C o.. ml ...... 5 o M 0 - f. By Date 'CO - ~ 1 . - -. ' - _ -. ' " ; 4.-. - 8-O v Analyzed «' ' U - x C ^OV^? *7* /L/£~S?s ^ '"' "9-'tt .;- - ' ; ---^St Cak. checked M J^^".- 7^/%/& ::* =~ ' //? X? -^ *? Typing cheeked GROUND WATER . NO. County ^& -&jpj£/0rt Locy^*^; WELL DATA ("S Sample No. Region; &/ +s /+ Use : /$//? /^/7C &~ Owner ; &##£ Sanp. Ft. ; **"-*' Remarks CAI riUM'.^o ml MAGNESIUM *ipnptime ; Disch. ; ?emp» : /£ Co epm TH /*,^7^,1 - ^v^^^ ffflOV ' Igency ; " PST '&.f& eom f^n X, /^ ternaries : /^r- ^ ^ cpiu wiy , ry a \f t SI LIC A. XP ml IRON (die;) _<££ ml IRONttotc n ml A // £> rr\c^^2.0J A Cn ppm l«^*J Mg ppm \&4- Fnrtnr 0.&&S Pnrtnr ^>- £>^4£ Factor _ ALKALINITY Asnmplp *40.£ Asnrnple /?ri?" Asample. HCO^I/y^r / ^Om, co,| SiOz pprr>[ ^^ Fe ppm \£>,0&. Fe ppm -f$* SODIUM dil POTASSIUM dii ^.&-£ Sample -^-^, i5* %T Snmpl S04 ppm ^^ Cl ppm|^.^» F ppm j^^. NO^ ppm | ^,c? B ppm | m epm SUM 7/ ^ %Na ^ ^ PH e P JCn C03 T/A ft SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE *&* £ ' &.£4.' MgKl^> * ?.// 1 ' 1 1 1 1 I Palmer 1958 opo 07*283 DATE STARTED DATE ALUMINUM ____ ml COPPER ____ ml A mg ., . _. App<>r Al A mg Aanmpl* F* X IP A*nmp!* . Fo^tnr Factor Mr. X H4- F X.05 -» Acorr. _.,,,. . Cu ppm LEAD ____ ml A mg ,.._,. Al ppm Asomple MANGANESE (qual.) / ml Factor . . pb ppm A m g ZINC ml Asomple A . mg Factor .Mn ppm c.oo L. cnm pie . Fnrtor , ...... _ Z n PP m CHROMIUM ml ARSENIC ml A mg , A mg Acampl*. ., A <;nmplft , Factor fr ppm Factor ,,,,-., As Ppm _____ ml _____ ml A m g _ A mg . A sample ...... ,,..,. F«,tn, ppm Factor ppm GROUND WATER LAB. NO. County : /^ Loc.No: WE ul|TT/' SlTAl^t-H _~/f-_ ^/ /y Sample No.: Region: /t/^y^r/ £jrg _^7" ~7*^" ^ Drilled: S?0~r/? &*./£- ' Depth : Ft. Di'a. : In. CTlNo. : Cased : Ft. Telrf. : JW "Basin : ^/r^ Grave3jpacked: ^* * -ff&y Loc. : .f , taH« f/f\f rt _^"X j*9 / Y ^ ^ Owner : "*^ epm TH /. & & . .gency : £/s^y / ppm Co /«,«£?£?. _ teraarks $ *»pm Mg *7- ^^ Sll ICA X/0 ml IROM(rii«;) ^S- ml IRON(total)--2^_ml ^ A <40*0 mg A/07 A XX ^ mg f>'0f A /yr ^ mg 0*01 Tn ppm 1 ^-/ J Mg ppm 1 &.£> Fnrtnr X7. /7^-*^ ALKALINITY Acnmplp /2^ Asample X/, ^ _ HCO, //^ | ^0 ^ C0? | | Si 0^ ppmj {^^ Fe ppm {3.()^*^ Fe Dpm &^0 ^' &*^ SODIUM rlil POTASSIUM dil Sample, -4QtQ %T c««.«i- *i x? «>/T,^,,«W TOTAL ALKALINITY as CO-, ^^^ Na ppm ^3.2. K PP m \ G*^ as HCO^I //y* | as CaCOa | 804 ppml ^?,0 \ Cl ppm ^.g F ppm 1 O.0 NOn ppm | J2.^$ B ppm | | pH epm epm SUM /7/ H A R D N E S S-js^e_ml %Na x^? as CaCOg X,**z-^7 os* *f*r £>.#/ K /).£>& F Total | ^ X?, <^-^ NO- HCO,(0-8?) fj^ %E ' 3 W Micromhos ^* X7 ^-? ^^^ ^ X^ D.S. ppm [ Non-Carb | at 25°C | /?£ - /*7 Sum Sum ^ -0.0-7 1\ Fi --<>"^='r y^ 1 1 1 1 Palmer 1958 DATE STARTED CHEMIST ^'P^^D DATE COMPLETED_2/_ CHECKED. /2 ALUMINUM ____ ml COPPER ____ ml A mg .. . App<"- A' A mg. ,.,,.,.. Afampl* F ff X |? A«f0nnpl* ., Fo^tor Factor Mn X < _ A color ,. ,. _ .... F X Of> + Acorr...... Cu ppm. LEAD *" A mg Al ppm Acnmple MANGANESE (qual.) / ml Factor .. . pfo ppm A mg. *~ ZINC ml Asnmple A . mg Factor Mn ppm o.oo Acnmplp F^i^-tor , , ..,_._ Zn ppm CHROMIUM ml ARSENIC ml A mg A mg AKampI* Afompl* Factor ,.._ ._ _ C r pp m Foc trtr , .... An ppm ____ ml ____ ml A mg . .,. A mg . , , A 5 0 m P 1 1 _ _.. Asomplf , FOC t o^ PP m Factor . . ppml GROUND WATER , / LAB. NO. 2T/3*< County ; ( ) Loc,No; WELL DA< ) Sample No.: Region; ^ E§ ; Drilled; Env. : DePtti ; Ft. Dia. ; In. SCT.No. ; (J M4*4A:£e-£r7~ cased ; Ft. Peirf. ; TWEasin : r? /^^f /fc:^^ J^A Gravel jpackedj Ixxs. : J T Use ; Owner : Remarks ; Samp. Ft. : g. A. /^^ ^f/^ CALCIUM ^^ ml MAGNESIUM . 'umptime ; Disch. : F. r CoUT ; <3£$~ p Pm c:n "'-£"£ Of/Q/G ^ /Q ¥ 0 & & i epm Mg (D '/ Jf SIIICA /0mi IRON(dis)_. *>C\j _ml A U>«7o>J mg 0*f A O» O ' ^ mn A *^ *\J I */ mn Co ppm \I *^/^^ Mg ppm 1! 5^0 * /^ Fnrtnr <£ £..// Fnrtnr O»*22/» Fnrfnr v/, *~^r* ALKALINITY A sample ft ,Yf ^^ Si 02 ppm[ // 1 A 0-J* Fe ppm &t 6~r\ /s-'Z SODIUM ft ^ riii POTA«;<;INM O H,-i 7,^ Sample *-*/ ~~~*j7<> %T q nmp |p ^ o/oT rurx/p £9 - /<9 TOTAL ALKALINITY as C03 ^f Na ppm c?. ^ K ppm £>./ as HC05 /OO as CaC0 3 1 ^^ SUi FATF /P ml rHi ORinF J~& m 1 Fl UORIOF /7 A mn (X0 J~ &* £T Fnrtor oC( t %3 Fnftnr -f s r C>.to r\. "7 Of 0 .6 4 ' «KLO QfH -" **O AcnmpIP Q.Q&'f A snmpfp 504 ppm [ V) «2 Cl ppm >? ^ F ppm | 0 ,0 | NO^ ppm 1 /. ^ B ppm | ^ pH epm epm SUM /0/ HARDNFSS ^ ml %No *7 as CaCOa T/Aft . O*// SPECIFIC /«t?(3 CONDUCTANCE ^ * 0 . "? J7 ». /- ^ /u J DISSOLVED sm IDA mi COLOR xi / 7 R /KPI\ >»r f f vT jPi X f r*t^' fxx f S °4 Rsomple . /d K ^^ Q F Total 1 ? 3 Wicromhos °/oE ^ ^ 3 /OJ Af/ /'^ D.S. ppm| Non-Carb | ^ | at 25 CC| /V | ,T* Sum Sum 1 ^ ^ T"! *7 ^^ / C^-^2^ f&-0 I z_i O *T / 1 Q Q 1 f " / " 4& So /^f^*t, 1 1 x / SJS Palmer 195 8 opo »7«283 DATES' TARTFP £//r/fr rHFMiRT /^r w L . Py^L/ DATE C OMPLFTPP P/^f/V^ rHFrKFp ^ ALUMINUM ____ ml COPPER ____ ml A mg , .. Appjir Al Afampl* F> X 1? AflarnplA Fnrtnr Factor Mn X O4- F X O5-K, , ,.. Acorr. .. .,. Cu ppm LEAD ____ ml A mg..,. _ . Al ppm A cr» m pi P MANGANESE (quol) /0-<9 ml Factor ,..._.... Pbppm A £^» *-* ' ^ m Q C'*^ * ZINC ml A<;omple O, ^ "^ A . mg Factor .Mn ppm O t(J A com pip . .,. _ Fnrtnr 7n ppm CHROMIUM ml ARSENIC ml A mg... , A mg Asampl* A S 0 rn p I fl .^ , ...... Factor Cr ppm Factor .... . As ppm ml ml A mg A ,mg . , . , Asomple Asomplf Factor ppm 1 j GRQUJh) WATER ^ ^AB. NO. /3~ A Co ppm 1 /v-5>^** Mg ppm ^7^ // Fnrtnr -y^2^-> F irtnr &''72,Z- Fnrfnr %tft/l-. ALKALINITY ) A finmplp Si. 4*<90 A sample ^^^^T HC0^I ^ 1 m | C0?l ^ i 1 Si Og PPm [ /£. F e ppm X/>& SODIUM -& - dil POTASSIUM 0 Hil ^^5 Snmplp ^ %T Qnmplp /1-S3 0/oT Curve . £> /& TOTAL ALKALINITY as CO^ ^, No ppm &r£T as HC03| ?g as CaCOg | ^^5 SUI FATF /^3 ml CHLORIDE ^ m FLUORJDE./^ ml 1 ml = 0-5mg Cl NITRATF /^ ml RORON ml ^ & ml AgpSO^ ..._ . ? A A <£>&&~ mg S04 ppm[ 9£/~ J Cl ppm £./ F ppm 1 &,&-/ J NO^ ppm 1 & / B ppm | , - SUM ^^ H^tVRDNESS 5& ml %Na ^ j CaCO-z 0! \j T/A ft . / ^ SPECIFIC n n ^ ^-G s o s> CONDUCTANCE /. Ls /*) . S x*5 u_ y^ Z* £/ uf*r\ DISSOLVED soi ins mi COLOR , s&r^* <*' *"* ZS3X, 0./2s Nn 4-0C* Cl 1 UKB '/? / K ^-^ / F T otal 1 /^ H ro-,(o-R?) ^ Vo L 3 xj Micromhos -/£ _ ? ' - ^ &- D.S. ppm [ N on-Carb | 6 at 25°C | /34 J Sum Sum ^= x^ # !i r, /^^" .. i i i i i Palmer 1958 DATE DATE COMPLETED. ALUMINUM ____ ml COPPER ____ ml A rnq An par Al A mg Atomple Fp X 1? ^_ \ Aftarnpl* Fartnr Factor , ,., Mn X 04 _ Arolnr F X.05 + Acorr ,.,,.. .,..,.,.,. Cu ppm LEAD ____ ml A mg ._,,._, Al ppm A cnmplp MANGANESE (juol.) ml Factor .._. Ph ppm A mg ZINC ml Atomple A . mg Factor .Mn ppm 'OIL, A S o m p 1 p Fflrtor Zn ppm r t-i R c\ M 1 1 1 ui ml ARSENIC ml A mg . A mo Atamnl* 1 Factor Cr ppm Fncfor ... A* ppm | _____ ml ____ ml A mg A mg A.nmpl. A sample . , .,,,..., ... Factor ..... PP m Foctor ., ..,,, ... ,, PP m LAB. NO. SURFACE WATER ( \ASTE S^ Source ; County / Si 02 ppmj Fe ppm Fe ppm SODIUM rfil POTASSIUM Hil 0/01 SfjmpIP %T C* nr \i A TOTAL ALKALINITY as C03 Na ppm K ppm as CaC0 3 | qm FATF ml CHLORIDE T~n n nl FI.UORIDF ml 1 ml= 0-5mg Cl NITRAT F ml RDRON ml /,£T/& ml Ag 2 S 04 Corr ml A mg A ma i Fnrtnr Factor f~ mg Std Asample 0 -O^O A simple V X4-//* £2, s ^?* ^*" N »~J S04 ppm| Cl ppm |67 | F ppm | NMjnftK* » ^\ B n m rn 1 6/? B ppm | epm epm SUM HARDNESS ____ ml %Na PH as CaCO-x j Cn T/Aft SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE HCO\-ir*f\3 DISSOLVED Mg . sni in?; mi COLOR R(KCI) ^^T so4 A. »^\ R sample . X^-41. 3 . n ci Cl TURB K Total | $tf ^W/tv?/, ^ a o i Mn_^ HCOatO-fl?) % O Micromhos D.S. ppm| Non-Cart) 1 at 25°C \J?J/ Sum Sum £k r, ^/^^^/^ £3 /9y/*'> i X F-.(Ca-tMg) epm Na SAR Palmar 1958 GPO 970288 DATE S TARTFD CHFMIST, _ _ DATE C OMPI FTFO .. - CHECKED ALUMINUM ____ ml COPPER _ __ ml A mg ..._., _ Appnr Al A mg. ..,.,.. Aiflmplo F f y 1? A^nrnpl* F Factor Mn ppm Acnmplp Fnftnr 7n ppm CHROMIUM ml ARSENIC ml A mg ' A mg Asampl* A<;nmplfl Factor Cr ppm Factor As ppm ,,, , , ____ ml _____ ml A mg A mg _...__... A*0«ipl* . , Asomplr , Factor . ppm Factor PP m z>und \fater Analysis ' Lab 'No ~<» \**^ * t""T 1 o i rL HS *L o .1 ai^r -^^ state I I County 9?"\&\\ ^^ : ) /r ')< 73 ?8 Ifi ** 1 1|O 3/. 1 gpf, MT 1 ' ' " * * /7T ** " Data Card 0X1 = 50 .' teigneslum ' fl /N O r -i *7* O . J?7 50 53 /A\ ' ; P I Ix " '- ' ^ 53 ' -j.' ^^^^b " ^3^^^^^ =r / f^"0 26 28 Sodium ^ Ha ,J Zn 11 55 £\L 5^ 58 3-1 ^ // 1 ly/rf) t/ ^/^7 *72Q ^^"^2 Dissolved Solids 5Q ^esidue Potassium ~TT * « rr POlj. t-4 i ' 0.*5-^) ® 6l 61i Calc 1 13 i )- 62. 65, as BC03 , 7^ ' " R (Kd) ^?« '' R Sample |^6CJ r ^ ^i t/.#e/ as OaCO^.^ o^ ^1 ^ CO, - as COo ': ^^ 666? 36 H Temp °P 39 Al .ilfca ua .06 ft ialciuu TH 2.7- 116 JSI Cu Data Card fc&gnesiom Source Q 50 53 Ha 28 S Zn 58 55 .2-3 32 Dissolved Solids Residue Potassivim f 59 61 .fft) 6k Calc 33 Hardness O Total Non-Garb / I Color Card R epm epm cations anions of Error E i UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . 2SW GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER ANALYSIS Location County Source Point of coll. Owner __ Treatment Use .Gage height (ft) Discharge (cfs) TempCF) Appear, when coll. Collected By Remarks -an ppm epm ppm epm Silica (SiOa ) M Bicarbonate (HCO3 ) J| i 1« T1^" Aluminum (Al) Carbonate (CO 3) * '- w»-A JhA Iron (Fe) n Sulfate (SO4) *,0 OilS Chloride (CD ..« ".tt*y d«t$- Fluor ide (F) 0»f - 0*03U- Calcium (Ca) M 0.4ft Magnesium (Mg) Nitrate (NO3 ) 2.5 &f$i 0«f 0,01 Sodium (Na) *.o Ota^ Potassium (K) i.f O,(l> Total Total v$4. .94 .«& ppm Specific conductance (micromhos at 25° C) 3S& Dissolved solids: ipwir Calculated pH W 4^- Residue on evaporation at 180°C i >« tliiii m» ColorfJS1^^?^ «? JJWPV llpll ._ Hardness as CaCO3 *l. . Noncarbonate ^ Lab. No. Field No. Project fiftfc* APPENDIX 3 DRINKING-WATER SOURCES (Data from the files of the Indian Health Service) APPENDIX A-3 WATER SOURCE INVESTIGATION UNALAKLEET, ALASKA '*« . -. MAY 1977 PREPARED BY Arthur D. Ronimus Office of Environmental Health Indian Health Service 3350 Commercial Drive Anchorage,.Alaska DEPTH WELLS DRILLED BY YEAR DRILLED LOCATION: DIAMETER: SOIL: WATER; QUANTITY: COMMENTS; PHS UNLESS NOTED 1962, January Downtown, Armory 4", 24' Sandy Good Low, 3 GPM Draws from perched water table, Inadequate for system, BIA drilled 1962, January Dovjftown, Armory 4", 24' Sandy Salt, Adequate Saline, BIA drilled v gravel, Iron clay 1963, June Airport 4", 20-30' Sandy Sufficient Draws water from perched gravel Saline quality from water table, subject to three wells salt water Intrusion, 15 GPM, Avg 1963, June Airport 4", 20-30' II Good 1963, June Airport 4", 20-30' II Good 1963, June A1 rport 4", 20-30' II Observation only # 1963, June .Airport 4", 20-30 II ii 1975, May Infiltration 6", 73' Sandy Good 1!15 GPM Not sufficient In volume as gallery gravel, source,.Corp of Engineers silts drilled -,.. 1975, December Pumphouse, 6", 109' Sandy Salt Adequate Salt water, for'use as emer gravel, 30 + GPM gency source frozen soils 1975, December Infiltration 6", 34' ; ": Sands & Saline 40 GPM Saline, not suitable as gallery gravel potable water source DEPTH -J _.. HELLS DRILLED BY YEAR DRILLED LOCATION DIAMETER: SOIL: WATER: QUANTITY; COl^EHTST^PHSnJNCESS NOTED 1977, January Powers Creek 6", 40' Sandy, Low NA 1-2 GPM maximum silts, water frozen 1977, January Spring source, 6", 50' Silt, No water NA Dry Hole A. F. H111 Clay frozen 1977, February Bluff region 6"", 50' Clay, No water NA Dry Hole FAA site rock 1977, February Unalakleet 6", 49' Clays, None NA Dry Hole River sand, gravel 1977, February Powers Creek 6", 34' Silt, Fresh, Good , Appears to be excellent sand & Clear 40 + GPM source gravel 1977, March Powers Creek 6", 35' S1lt, Good Low Not adequate as source- sand, water 3-4 GPM Potential Damage to Access Access Transmission Potential 4 to Gallery to Gallery Line Potential of Flood Damage ! Potential Potential Site for Site for During Onshore Power ' Damage to During Spring .V Contamination Water Water Quality, Maintenance Maintenance Floods with Reliability Availability" Tn^e^Duemg" Breakup Intake . , Sources of Source Supply w/F1ltrat1on During Summer During Winter Block Ice of Source & Rel ability Onshore FToocT"~or-MpeMne_ * ' Watershed - Existing Not adequate Poor (Iron Poor: slough . Good: snow High damage Poor Good (uses Washing out Yes, '''Yes, Musk Ox Trail 1n winter and color In crossing machine Potential ' FAA stand of existing Building .Farm Creek months. Less winter) #5 required by) line 1s has flooded than 20 gpm possible 1n winter r . Power 80 gpm Good Good Good Low damage Good Good, None None * Minimal Creek can be (road access) (road) potential . would use Increased stand by 4* with more generator site develop with power ment line from #.' ' ' ' pumphouse Unalakleet Yes Potential Poor Will Good high damage Marginal Good, FAA . Washing out bank erosion '.Minimal River Unlimited . salt water require a potential (salty at stand by of existing may Interfere Jf' Supply Intrusion boat or times line 1s with the during high- slough crossing possible collection i" tide system North Yes Good Poor will Poor: snow High Good Would require Washing out Bank erostaf Minimal River Unlimited require 4 . machine damage overhead power of existing may interfere Supply wheel drive steep hills potential line line 1s with the vehicle 8 possible collection ; miles system :: r'. ' Dam on Yes Poor , Poor Good: snow High damage Poor: high - Good FAA Washing out None "Yes, Musk Ox Trail 40 + gpm machine potential Iron and stand by of existing Farm . Creek color l.1ne 1s possible