DOCSLIB.ORG

Stick It in Your Ear! How Not to Do Science Ear Acupuncture Claims to Relieve Sore Throats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stick It in Your Ear! How Not to Do Science Ear Acupuncture Claims to Relieve Sore Throats Stick It In Your Ear! How Not To Do Science Ear acupuncture claims to relieve sore throats. A new study seeming to support that idea is so poorly done that it provides a textbook example of how to distinguish between good and bad science. HARRIET HALL ave a sore throat? No worries! No need for lozenges, doesn’t matter whether you use needles at all. In one study, simply touching the medicines, or home remedies. All you need to do is skin surface with a toothpick worked Hlet someone stick needles in your ear! According to just as well as penetrating the skin with a needle (Cherkin et al. 2009). There a recent study, ear acupuncture relieves sore throats. Do was even a study where subjects were you believe that? I don’t. That’s one of those extraordi- given a “phantom limb” illusion that a nary claims that would require extraordinary evidence, but rubber hand was their own hand, and they got similar results from acupunc- the researchers didn’t even provide ordinary evidence. The turing the rubber hand! (Chae et al. study is a great example of how not to do science. 2015). The main thing that seems to matter is whether the patients believe Acupuncture theory is based on a acupuncture will work. If they get a prescientific vitalistic concept: an un- sham procedure but think they got the measurable, undetectable energy called real thing, they will think it worked. If “qi” supposedly flows through meridi- they get the real thing but think they ans and can be accessed at acupoints, got a sham procedure, they will think where needle stimulation is supposed to it didn’t work. It has been pretty well somehow unblock the flow of qi, which established that acupuncture is nothing is somehow supposed to relieve pain more than a theatrical placebo (Col- and improve health. Qi, meridians, quhoun and Novella 2013). and acupoints are imaginary, but that The Center for Inquiry issued a po- doesn’t necessarily mean acupuncture sition paper on acupuncture that con- can’t possibly work. It’s not implausi- cludes: ble that sticking needles into the skin It is becoming increasingly clear might have some physiologic effects, that the placebo effect accounts for so it is reasonable to do scientific stud- much of the optimistic research on ies—and thousands of studies have acupuncture published between the been done, some better than others. 1970s and 1990s. With the devel- The results have been disappointing. opment of sham needles during the past decade—needles which retract It is not reasonable to conclude from like stage knives—researchers have the existing published studies that acu- tion and the surrounding rituals, and since been able to more accurately puncture works. the effects are too small in magnitude assess the therapeutic effects of Some people believe acupuncture to have any clinical importance. The acupuncture. The result has been is an effective way to relieve pain, but most rigorous studies have shown that a complete unraveling of nearly all acupuncture claims. The bulk the evidence from scientific studies and sham acupuncture works just as well as of recent research strongly tends systematic reviews is mixed. Any posi- “real” acupuncture. It doesn’t matter towards the hypothesis that acu- tive effects can be attributed to sugges- where you put the needles, and in fact it puncture’s positive effects are mainly Skeptical Inquirer | May/June 2016 51 due to a built-in expectation. anatomy. They transposed human dia- five short needles that are left in place (Slack 2010) grams onto animals without any testing to eventually fall out on their own; the When The Medical Letter reviewed for validity; the acupuncture diagram method is taught to non-acupuncturists acupuncture in 2006, it concluded for horses, for example, shows gallblad- in a four-hour workshop. The authors “Acupuncture alone has not been shown der meridians. Horses don’t have gall- claim that there is research supporting bladders. ear acupuncture, but they admit that in rigorous, duplicated studies to bene- There are many different systems of there is only “limited data” regarding fit any defined medical condition.” Our acupuncture, some involving needles the modified technique. You’d think own CSI fellow, Steven Novella, coau- and some involving various kinds of that before they forged ahead to use it thored the paper that concluded acu- stimulation of acupoints through in- on wounded soldiers on the battlefield, puncture was nothing more than a the- tact skin (with electricity, light, heat, they’d want convincing evidence that it atrical placebo (Colquhoun and Novella and other modalities). The number of worked. There isn’t any. 2013). Medical ethicists unanimously meridians and acupoints varies among Ear acupuncture isn’t as silly as tong agree that doctors should not prescribe the different systems. In traditional ren, but it’s still pretty silly. It was in- placebos. So why are some doctors still acupuncture, there were originally 365 vented by a Frenchman, Dr. Paul No- recommending acupuncture? acupoints to symbolically correspond to gier, in 1957. He invented it all by him- the days of the year; now there are over self—not through science but through 2,000. In Korean acupuncture, there are intuition and epiphany. He looked at 300 acupoints, all on the hand. In other the external ear, the pinna, and imag- systems, they are found only on the ear, ined that it looked sort of like a fetus scalp, tongue, or foot. With all those curled up in its mother’s womb. I can different acupoints in all those different tell you he had a much better imagina- systems, is there any spot on the body tion than I do; I can’t see the resem- The Air Force doctors that isn’t an acupoint in some system? blance. He arbitrarily assigned a spot on clearly have drunk the Yes, there is: no system uses points the ear to correspond to the part of the on the male genitalia. Draw your own imagined fetus, tried inserting needles Kool-Aid, because they conclusions! A variant called “tong ren” in ears, and confirmation bias kicked allege that points on the doesn’t use acupoints at all; the patient in to convince him that it worked on rhythmically taps an acupuncture doll the corresponding part of the body. He ear correspond to areas with a metal hammer. The online video originally used thirty points; now ear on the body and stimu- of tong ren (https://www.youtube. acupuncturists claim to have identified com/watch?v=_I4r3FrzFBc) has to be 120. The ear is pretty small to accom- lating them “balances seen to be believed: Is there no limit to modate 120 acupoints, and anyway human gullibility? As far as I know, no there are no connections between the the flow of the body’s one has ever thought to try testing one ear and those other parts of the body. energy or qi.” system of acupuncture against another The study, “Ear Acupuncture for to find out which one is superior. For Acute Sore Throat: A Randomized that matter, no one has ever thought Controlled Trial,” (Moss and Craw- to test homeopathy, chiropractic, acu- ford 2015) was published in the Journal puncture, and Reiki against each other. of the American Board of Family Medi- Alternative medicine simply doesn’t cine. The fact that the editors did not think that way. Anything goes. reject the study is both surprising and The sore throat study didn’t use tra- disappointing. ditional acupuncture. It used ear acu- Moss and Crawford studied fif- puncture—and not even standard ear ty-four patients who presented to an Air Unfortunately, there are many doc- acupuncture but a simplified version. Force family medicine clinic with pain tors who lack critical thinking skills and Why? Because the researchers were from sore throat. They were random- don’t really understand science or the Air Force doctors, and the Air Force ized into two groups: one got standard psychology of cognitive errors. They has been teaching ear acupuncture as treatment (ibuprofen, plus antibiotics don’t all read SKEPTICAL INQUIRER or “battlefield acupuncture” to its doctors when indicated); the other got standard the Science-Based Medicine blog. They under the guidance of Col. Richard treatment plus ear acupuncture. There should. Niemtzow. They clearly have drunk was no blinding and no sham acupunc- The history of acupuncture research the Kool-Aid, because they allege that ture control group. They didn’t even is revealing. There were never any con- points on the ear correspond to areas standardize the treatment: they placed trolled studies to verify the alleged loca- on the body and stimulating them “bal- “up to 10” needles. Unblinded research tion of meridians and acupoints or their ances the flow of the body’s energy or associates assessed the results by phone alleged connections to other parts of the qi.” Their modified procedure involves interview. Patients in the acupuncture 52 Volume 40 Issue 3 | Skeptical Inquirer group reported significantly less pain at and produce analgesia too, so sham boost their spirits? We can predict that fifteen minutes and twenty-four hours acupuncture wouldn’t be a placebo, it those would have “worked” too, maybe after the procedure, although at for- would actually be a treatment! If that equally well or better. That’s why prag- ty-eight hours there was no difference were true, it would mean that acu- matic studies such as this are useless. from the control group. Acupuncture puncture’s whole treatment rigmarole It’s an ill wind that blows nobody patients reported taking fewer ibupro- is unnecessary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    NO. 17-_____ In the Supreme Court of the United States EDWARD LEWIS TOBINICK, MD, a Medical Corporation d/b/a INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL RECOVERY, INR PLLC, d/b/a INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL RECOVERY, EDWARD TOBINICK, M.D., Petitioners, –v– STEVEN NOVELLA, M.D., Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI CULLIN A. O’BRIEN, ESQ. COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS CULLIN O’BRIEN LAW, P.A. 6541 NE 21ST WAY FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33308 (561) 676-6370 [email protected] SEPTEMBER 1, 2017 SUPREME COURT PRESS ♦ (888) 958-5705 ♦ BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS i QUESTIONS PRESENTED In our age of the Internet, false disparagement against individuals and businesses can be lucrative. An Internet entrepreneur can funnel web-traffic for profit, through sophisticated uses of disparaging “click baiting,” “Internet trolling,” hyperlinks, hypertext, clickable banner ads, podcasts, Facebook, Instagram, email listservs and other systems. Individuals seeking legal redress from false Internet defamation can confront state court anti-SLAPP procedures that accelerate adjudication of the defendant’s “actual malice.” In contrast, businesses seeking federal court protection from false Internet disparagement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(1)(B), are entitled to the summary adjudication safeguards of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The questions presented to this Court are: 1. When a defendant is sued for both common law defamation and business disparagement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B), does the application of state civil court anti-SLAPP procedure irreconcilably conflict with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • CFI-Annual-Report-2018.Pdf
    Message from the President and CEO Last year was another banner year for the Center the interests of people who embrace reason, for Inquiry. We worked our secular magic in a science, and humanism—the principles of the vast variety of ways: from saving lives of secular Enlightenment. activists around the world who are threatened It is no secret that these powerful ideas like with violence and persecution to taking the no others have advanced humankind by nation’s largest drugstore chain, CVS, to court unlocking human potential, promoting goodness, for marketing homeopathic snake oil as if it’s real and exposing the true nature of reality. If you medicine. are looking for humanity’s true salvation, CFI stands up for reason and science in a way no look no further. other organization in the country does, because This past year we sought to export those ideas to we promote secular and humanist values as well places where they have yet to penetrate. as scientific skepticism and critical thinking. The Translations Project has taken the influential But you likely already know that if you are reading evolutionary biology and atheism books of this report, as it is designed with our supporters in Richard Dawkins and translated them into four mind. We want you not only to be informed about languages dominant in the Muslim world: Arabic, where your investment is going; we want you to Urdu, Indonesian, and Farsi. They are available for take pride in what we have achieved together. free download on a special website. It is just one When I meet people who are not familiar with CFI, of many such projects aimed at educating people they often ask what it is we do.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Isagenix a Case Study in Flawed Thinking
    SI Jan Feb 11 from home_SI new design masters 11/12/10 11:56 AM Page 41 Defending Isagenix A Case Study in Flawed Thinking Do those who comment on blogs even read the articles they are responding to? Here is a case study in emotional thinking, ad hominem arguments, logical fallacies, irrationality, and misinformation. HARRIET HALL he Internet is a wonderful medium for communicat- To illustrate, let’s look at some re- sponses to a piece I wrote about a ing ideas and information in a rapid, interactive way. weight-loss product called Isagenix, TMany online articles are followed by a section for which is sold through a multilevel mar- comments. Like so many things in this imperfect world, keting (MLM) scheme. To quote its website verbatim, “The Isagenix cleanse comments are a mixed blessing. They can enhance the ar- is unique because it not only removes ticle by correcting errors, adding further information, or impurities at the cellular level, it builds contributing useful thoughts to a productive discussion. the body up with incredible nutrition. Besides detoxing the body, Isagenix But all too often the comments section consists of emo- teaches people a wonderful lesson that tional outbursts, unwarranted personal attacks on the au- they don’t need to eat as much as they thor, logical fallacies, and misinformation. It provides are accustom [sic] to and eating healthy choices are really important and also a irrational and ignorant people with a soapbox from which lot of the food we are eating is nutri- to promote prejudices and false information.
    [Show full text]
  • FDA, FTC, and the Regulation of Pseudoscience
    In Pursuit of Science-based Regulation: FDA, FTC, and the Regulation of Pseudoscience What does “natural” mean? The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has posed this seemingly innocuous question to the public in a recent request for information.1 Aside from it being a truly interesting, if overly philosophical question to ask the public, the move is emblematic of a recent trend, both from the (“FDA”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), to regulate based on some articulable scientific premise, rather than allowing various actors to make wide-ranging claims about their products without repercussion. 2 In particular, the agencies have begun targeting dietary supplement manufacturers, homeopathic remedies, and most recently, Lumosity. Lumosity and the FTC Lumosity advertises copiously on networks and websites that include “CNN, Fox News, the History Channel, National Public Radio, Pandora, Sirius XM, and Spotify.” 3 Created by “Lumos Labs,” Lumosity is a web-based product consisting of 40 games, which Lumosity claimed that, when played “10 to 15 minutes three or four times a week could help users achieve their ‘full potential in every aspect of life.’”4 The FTC got involved because Lumos Labs claimed playing Lumosity’s games would 1) improve performance on everyday tasks, in school, at work, and in athletics; 2) delay age- related cognitive decline and protect against mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease; and 3) reduce cognitive impairment associated with health conditions, including stroke, traumatic brain
    [Show full text]
  • Neurologica Blog » Why Are We Conscious?
    NeuroLogica Blog » Why Are We Conscious? http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/why-are-we-conscious/ Home About The Author – Steven Novella, MD Topic Suggestions Feb 06 2017 Why Are We Conscious? Published by Steven Novella under Neuroscience Comments: 26 In Daniel Dennett’s latest book,From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds, Dennett explores a number of issues surrounding consciousness. I have not yet completed the book and so may come back to it again, but wanted to discuss one topic that Dennett covers – why are we conscious in the first place? Dennett makes a distinction between competence and comprehension. Competence is the ability to perform some task, while comprehension is understanding the task and the process. The former is unconscious, while the latter is conscious. This touches on Chalmers’ “P-zombie” problem – if we can imagine an organism that can do everything a human does without experiencing its own existence (a philosophical zombie), then why did consciousness evolve at all? There are several possible solutions to this problem. The first is that humans were “designed” to be conscious by whatever agent made us. This introduces unnecessary elements and contradicts established science, so I think we can set that aside. The second solution is that consciousness is an epiphenomenon. We don’t need to be conscious, but we evolved consciousness as an evolutionary accident. This may be true, but is unsatisfying as it just side-steps the question of what use is consciousness. The third solution, which I find compatible with the evidence and compelling, is that consciousness is inherent to the functioning of our brains and brings with it specific advantages.
    [Show full text]
  • Debunking Detox Diets
    6NHSWLFLVP6FLHQFH6RFLHW\ 9ROXPH1R0DUFK AN INTRODUCTION TO PARAPSYCHOLOGY A REMOTE VIEWING EXPERIMENT SCIENTOLOGY AND THE TRAVOLTA TRAGEDY ENVIRONMENTAL DEBATES AND LOGICAL FALLACIES PSYCHIATRY BASHING DEBUNKING DETOX DIETS ZZZVNHSWLFVFRPDX Skeptics Around Australia New South Wales PO Box 438 Collaroy Beach NSW 2097 Connect with the next generation! Tel: 0432 713 195 Fax: (02) 8088 4735 Scientists in Schools is a national program [email protected] that creates long-term professional Hunter Skeptics partnerships between scientists and Ph: (02) 4959 6286 [email protected] teachers. It’s completely fl exible to [email protected] suit your interests and availability. Victoria Australian Skeptics (Vic) Inc GPO Box 5166AA, Melbourne VIC 3001 Find out more at Tel: 1 800 666 996 www.scientistsinschools.edu.au [email protected] Borderline Skeptics Scientists in Schools PO Box 17 , Mitta Mitta VIC 3701 Tel: (02) 6072 3632 is an Australian [email protected] Government initiative. Queensland Queensland Skeptics Assn Inc PO Box 6454 , Fairfi eld Gardens QLD 4103 Tel: (07) 3255 0499 [email protected] Gold Coast Skeptics PO Box 8348, GCMC Bundall QLD 9726 Tel: (07) 5593 1882 Fax: (07) 5593 2776 [email protected] ACT Canberra Skeptics PO Box 555, Civic Square ACT 2608 Tel: (02) 6121 4483 [email protected] South Australia Skeptics SA 52B Miller St Unley SA 5061 Tel: (08) 8272 5881 [email protected] Western Australia WA Skeptics PO Box 466, Subiaco WA 6904 Tel: (08) 9448 8458 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editor Skep Ti Cal Inq Uir E R™ the MAG a ZINE for SCI ENCE and REA SON
    SI Sept/Oct pgs_SI MJ 2010 7/23/10 12:41 PM Page 4 From the Editor Skep ti cal In quir e r™ THE MAG A ZINE FOR SCI ENCE AND REA SON ED I TOR Kend rick Fra zi er ED I TO RI AL BOARD James E. Al cock Martin Gardner and the Skeptical Movement Today Thom as Cas ten Ray Hy man Joe Nick ell Am ar deo Sar ma artin Gardner’s passing and the latest successful skeptic’s conference are both causes for Benjamin Wolozin Mreflection on where the skeptical movement Gardner helped found stands now. CON SULT ING ED I TORS I begin these comments as I depart The Amazing Meeting 8 (TAM8), the James Randi Sus an J. Black more Ken neth L. Fed er Educational Foundation’s big skeptics conference in Las Vegas. Martin Gardner’s legacy was much Barry Karr in evidence, and indeed Gardner received a moving tribute from Randi at the beginning of a late- E. C. Krupp Scott O. Lil i en feld afternoon panel on the origin of the skeptics movement. Randi, Ray Hyman, and Paul Kurtz— Da vid F. Marks three giants who, with Gardner, were present at the beginning—and I talked about the events that Jay M. Pasachoff Eu ge nie Scott led to the creation of CSICOP (now our Committee for Skeptical Inquiry) in 1976. Ray’s, Randi’s, Rich ard Wis e man and Paul’s reminiscences also lead off this special Martin Gardner Tribute Issue of the SKEPTICAL CON TRIB UT ING ED I TORS INQUIRER , pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Jennifer Forester, Faculty Mentor
    Pics or It Didn’t Happen: Sexist Hyperskepticism in the Modern Skeptical Movement Author: Jennifer Forester, Faculty Mentor: Clark Pomerleau, Ph.D., Department of English, College of Arts and Sciences Department and College Affiliation: Department of English, College of Arts and Sciences Pics or It Didn’t Happen 2 Bio: Jennifer Forester graduated summa cum laude from the University of North Texas with a bachelor’s degree in English with a specialization in writing and rhetoric. Jennifer was a member of the Honors College. She presented her research at University Scholars Day in April 19, 2013. She is proud of her service in the United States Marine Corps where she was a Corporal (Bandsman, Armorer) in Cherry Point, North Carolina. She is a mother of two brilliant, if often unruly, children. Her current plan is to find gainful employment, but promises that she will eventually return to college and obtain her doctorate in rhetoric with a particular focus on the ways that rhetorical studies can be applied to social justice. Pics or It Didn’t Happen 3 Abstract: In the skeptical community, there is an ongoing conflict over what—if any—actions are necessary to make the movement more welcoming to the growing numbers of women in its ranks. This conflict has brought a great deal of antifeminist sentiment to the surface, to include rape and death threats against prominent women who speak affirmatively on feminist issues within organized skepticism. The origins of this problem can be found in the grounding of skeptical dialogue on the superiority of a traditionally masculinized ideal of science and reason, which excludes the feminized personal narratives that serve as evidence for mistreatment of women within the community.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Alternative' Medicines 20 August 2014
    Experts denounce clinical trials of unscientific, 'alternative' medicines 20 August 2014 Experts writing in the Cell Press journal Trends in science-based medicine rather than evidence-based Molecular Medicine on August 20th call for an end medicine. Biologically plausible treatments should to clinical trials of "highly implausible treatments" advance to randomized clinical trials only when such as homeopathy and reiki. Over the last two there is sufficient preclinical evidence to justify the decades, such complementary and alternative effort, time, and expense, as well as the use of medicine (CAM) treatments have been embraced human subjects. in medical academia despite budget constraints and the fact that they rest on dubious science, they "Somehow this idea has sprung up that to be a say. 'holistic' doctor you have to embrace pseudoscience like homeopathy, reiki, traditional The writers, David Gorski of Wayne State Chinese medicine, and the like, but that's a false University School of Medicine and Steven Novella dichotomy," Gorski said. "If the medical system is of Yale University, argue that, in these cases, the currently too impersonal and patients are rushed medical establishment is essentially testing through office visits because a doctor has to see whether magic works. Gorski and Novella are both more and more patients to cover his salary and editors for Science-Based Medicine, an expenses, then the answer is to find a way to fix organization and blog dedicated to exploring the those problems, not to embrace quackery. complicated relationship between science and 'Integrating' pseudoscience with science-based medicine. medicine isn't going to make science-based medicine better.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Closes Tobinick Suit Against Dr. Steven Novella
    Case 9:14-cv-80781-RLR Document 288 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/02/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 9:14-CV-80781 ROSENBERG/BRANNON EDWARD LEWIS TOBINICK, M.D., et al, Plaintiffs, v. STEVEN NOVELLA, M.D., Defendant. / ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DR. STEVEN NOVELLA M.D.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Dr. Steven Novella M.D.’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 251]. The Court has reviewed the motion, the response [DE 272], the reply [DE 277], and the attached exhibits. The Court has also reviewed the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion [DE 251] is GRANTED. The speech at issue is not actionable under the Lanham Act because it is not commercial speech, and Plaintiffs’ unfair competition claims fail as well because they rely on a similar theory of liability. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, filed on August 1, 2014, brought five counts against four defendants. See DE 55. Many claims and defendants have been disposed of earlier in this litigation. The only remaining claims are: Count I for violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 Case 9:14-cv-80781-RLR Document 288 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/02/2015 Page 2 of 10 1125(a), and Count II for unfair competition.1 The only remaining Defendant is Dr. Steven Novella, M.D.2 Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint are based on two articles written by Defendant Novella and published online at sciencebasedmedicine.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Exuberant Champion of the New Enlightenment
    Jan Feb 13 2_SI new design masters 11/29/12 11:26 AM Page 14 Exuberant Champion of the New Enlightenment KENDRICK FRAZIER countries around the globe. From the beginning he was deeply knowledgeable about, and directly in- volved in, scientific-based skeptical in- quiry. This energized our committee and SI as well. He had more energy and enthusiasm than three people. His output of writing was prodigious. He was overwhelmingly positive and optimistic. And courageous. And something else—exuberant. It was such a pleasure to be his colleague. Paul was my mentor and my friend. He brought me into CSICOP (now CSI). He strongly supported me and SI. A young CSICOP chairman Paul Kurtz, lower right, watches a younger Ken Frazier, then still editor ofScience He granted us editorial autonomy, pub- News but about to become editor of SI, speak at first CSICOP meeting in August 1977 in New York City. licly. When controversy came, as it often did, he always encouraged me. He felt Paul Kurtz had a broad and clear vision aggressive. He always emphasized the that if you are not creating some contro- for a return to Enlightenment values— positive. versy, you are not doing things right. And reason, scientific thinking, and reliance on By his own example of thoughtful he practiced his own humanist values. human thought, not authority or super- philosophical discourse and open- He was kind to me and my family in naturalism, for our ethical values and re- minded critical inquiry and by the caliber ways no one will ever know. sponsibilities to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Skepticism? STEVEN NOVELLA
    ISSUES IN SCIENCE & SKEPTICISM: 40th Anniversary Celebration Why Skepticism? STEVEN NOVELLA wenty years ago, I became actively involved in the hand-in-hand with logic and skeptical movement when I and several others founded philosophy, and therefore skep- T tics also promote understanding a humble local skeptical group. We were inspired by of these fields and the promotion CSICOP (now CSI) and SKEPTICAL INQUIRER to add of critical thinking skills. what we could to efforts to make the world a more skep- Science vs. Pseudoscience: Skep- tical place. tics seek to identify and elucidate Over the past two decades, as possible in our beliefs and the borders between legitimate the skeptical landscape has opinions. This means subjecting science and pseudoscience, to changed quite a bit, but one all claims to a valid process of expose pseudoscience for what it constant has been the endless evaluation. is, and to promote knowledge of question: What is skepticism? Methodological Naturalism: how to tell the difference. What exactly do we do and why? Skeptics believe that the world Ideological Freedom/Free In- As the movement has grown and is knowable because it follows quiry: Science and reason can diversified, the question has be- certain rules or laws of nature. flourish only in a secular society come only more complex. The only legitimate methods in which no ideology (religious for knowing anything empirical or otherwise) is imposed upon individuals or the process of sci- What Is the Mission of the about the universe follows this ence or free inquiry. Skeptical Movement? naturalistic assumption. In other words, within the realm of the Neuropsychological Humility: I have come to understand that empirical you don’t get to invoke Being a functional skeptic re- scientific skepticism is a weird magic or the supernatural.
    [Show full text]