DOCSLIB.ORG

Permit to Work (PTW)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Permit to Work (PTW) Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Permit To Work (PTW) BP WIND ENERGY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PERMIT TO WORK (PTW) Document Control Details Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Print Date: 9/17/2011 Paper copies are uncontrolled. This copy valid only at the time of printing. The controlled version of this document can be found on the BP Wind Energy Sharepoint site. Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Permit To Work (PTW) 1.0 Purpose Permit to Work (PTW) is a key part of managing work activities that have inherently higher risks or unique aspects that could lead to a higher level of risk than routine or daily work activities. It is supported by other management policies, procedures, and processes to regulate all work activities and manage risk. The purpose of this PTW document is to provide guidance in confirming: Completion of all defined work activities, notation of the hazards involved, and precautions to be taken prior to the execution of the work (e.g., use of JSEAs, Safe Work Plan [SWP], etc.). Coordination of all activities to provide a safe working environment for all personnel at the site (e.g., conducting Simultaneous Operations [SIMOPS] meetings). 2.0 Reference 2.1 BP Group CoW - GDP_4_5 2.2 HSSE 14.20.01 - BPWE JSEA Procedure 2.3 HSSE 13.40.01 - BPWE Confined Space Procedure 2.4 HSSE 13.50.01 - BPWE Hot Work Procedure 2.5 HSSE 13.30.01 - BPWE Lockout/Tagout Procedure 2.6 HSSE 13.60.01 - BPWE Ground Disturbance Procedure 3.0 Scope 3.1 This procedure is applicable to all BP Wind Energy employees and contractors that intend to perform work on BP Wind Energy premises. 3.2 Permanent on-site contractors may utilize their own PTW procedures as long as the procedures meet or exceed the requirements outlined in this procedure and have been approved by BP Wind Energy. 3.3 This procedure does not apply to “Non-Operational” Construction sites. These sites may utilize the PTW procedures of the General Contractor as long as those procedures meet or exceed the requirements outlined in this procedure and have been approved by BP Wind Energy. Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Print Date: 9/17/2011 Paper copies are uncontrolled. This copy valid only at the time of printing. The controlled version of this document can be found on the BP Wind Energy Sharepoint site. Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Permit To Work (PTW) 4.0 Responsibilities 4.1 Permit Authority - This role is carried out by the Facility/Site/Project Manager and has the following responsibilities: Overall operation of the Permit to Work Procedure in their physical area of responsibility. Ensuring that the Permit to Work procedure is subject to regular monitoring and auditing, action upon the results of these audits to maintain the integrity of the system and proposing any recommendations for system improvement. Authorizing the Area Authority, Performing Authority, and Issuing Authority to carry out their duties, as described in this procedure. Ensuring that the training and competency standards, as defined in this procedure are followed and to satisfy himself/herself that the AA is competent. Authorization of all categories of Work Permits. Approval of Lessons Learned and audits. 4.2 Area Authority (AA) - are responsible for the day-to-day management of the Permit to Work process within their defined area. The Area Authority is normally the FM, DFM, Project Manager, site manager, or equivalent, although any individual can be assigned this role. There can be more than one Area Authority at the site or premises. Have overall responsibility for the safe control of non-routine work activities within their defined area in accordance with the Permit to Work system, including the issue of all Work Permits and associated Certificates. Ensure the appropriate level of risk assessment has been carried out for the task. Liaise closely with the Performing Authority when planning Permits, to ensure that appropriate controls are identified for each identified hazard. Ensure all the agreed control measures are in place, confirm that the Performing Authority fully understands the scope of the task and that other members of the work party have been fully briefed via a safety Toolbox Talk or equivalent means of communication. Provide the culture to “STOP the Job” if anyone feels unsafe or uncertain about any aspect of the task. Approve isolation design, control isolation implementation and ensure the agreed isolations are in place prior to allowing an associated permit to be issued. Ensure that the isolations are properly removed after completion of the work and cancellation of the permit. Ensure that worksite inspections are carried out before, during and after the performance of each task (some of this task may be delegated to a competent direct report). Ensure that adequate handovers take place at shift change, crew change or other change out/over of Area Authorities, Performing Authorities and Isolation Authorities. Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Print Date: 9/17/2011 Paper copies are uncontrolled. This copy valid only at the time of printing. The controlled version of this document can be found on the BP Wind Energy Sharepoint site. Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Permit To Work (PTW) 4.3 Issuing Authority (IA) - The IA may be the Lead Technician or Supervisor responsible for normal operations within a particular discipline. The IA shall be an individual with additional training and understanding of safe practices. The IA may be the AA. If not the AA, the IA will support the AA in the safe control of work activities. This position is responsible to the AA for the management and safety of all activities within the designated area, including the issue of a PTW. Must be onsite for the duration of the Permitted task and confirm the job is performed per the requirements of the Permit, JSEA, Safe Work Plan and/or Level 2 risk assessment, whichever is applicable to the Permit. Issue Permits in accordance with the procedures within their area. Work closely with the PA when planning Permits to confirm that the appropriate hazards and controls have been identified for that task. THE SAME PERSON CANNOT ACT AS IA AND PA FOR THE SAME TASK. Confirm that all appropriate control measures are put in place prior to allowing a Permit to go live. Confirm that the PA fully understands the scope of the task and that other members of the work party are fully briefed. Authorize continuation of work where additional hazards are identified at the work site. Monitor work time limits specified on individual Permits. Restrict the number of Permits an individual PA manages at any one time. Confirm all personnel working within PTW are appropriately trained. 4.4 Performing Authority (PA) - The PA’s main duties are to: Initiate the Permit and identify the hazards and control measures for the task being planned. Participate in any Risk Assessment where required. Hold tool box meetings as necessary to ensure that all other persons involved in the task fully understand the scope of the work, the identified hazards and associated controls (and ensure that all participating in the task sign off the worksite hard copy of the Permit). Provide the culture to “STOP the Job” if anyone feels unsafe or uncertain about any aspect of the task. Ensure that only personnel authorized by the Permit participate in the work and no unauthorized interference takes place. Ensure that if there are any changes to the initial Permit conditions the work is stopped and reassessed (Note: these include both changes in the work scope and conditions at the work site). Report and interact regularly with the AA and IA on any issues, to ensure risks Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Print Date: 9/17/2011 Paper copies are uncontrolled. This copy valid only at the time of printing. The controlled version of this document can be found on the BP Wind Energy Sharepoint site. Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Permit To Work (PTW) from all hazards continue to be mitigated by controls to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). Ensure that any agreed supplementary controls are recorded on the Permit and applied. Ensure that only work covered within the Permit scope takes place. Ensure that lessons learned from the job are captured. Ensure that the worksite is kept in a clean and safe condition both during and upon completion of the job. Ensure adequate handovers take place at shift and crew change periods with the oncoming Performing and Area Authorities. 4.5 Authorized Gas Tester Shall minimally test for the presence of flammable vapors, toxic gases, and oxygen prior to and during work covered by a Hot Work or Confined Space Entry Permit. When it is determined that Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) or other toxic agents may be present, the PA or AGT shall notify the IA and AA and consultation with the HSSE Advisor shall be initiated. AGTs shall be trained on the specific monitor in use and must understand the limitations of the devices that they are using. 4.6 Fire Watch - The Fire Watch is responsible for confirming that: Flammable materials have been cleared away from the work area. Sparks and welding spatter are contained by the use of fire blankets. Firefighting equipment is available and ready for immediate use. The alarm is sounded immediately and work suspended when a fire or gas release occurs in the area. The work site is monitored for 30 minutes after Hot Work stops. Document Number HSSE 13.20.01 Print Date: 9/17/2011 Paper copies are uncontrolled. This copy valid only at the time of printing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tag out a Shipyard Hazard Prevention Course
    Workshop Objectives At the completion of this workshop it is expected that all trainees will pass a quiz, have the ability to identify energy hazards and follow both OSHA and NAVSEA safety procedures associated with: Electrical Hazards Non-Electrical Energy Hazards Lockout - Tag out 11 OSHA 1915.89 SUBPART F Control of Hazardous Energy -Lock-out/ Tags Plus This CFR allows specific exemptions for shipboard tag-outs when Navy Ship’s Force personnel serve as the lockout/tags-plus coordinator and maintain control of the machinery per the Navy’s Tag Out User Manual (TUM). Note to paragraph (c)(4) of this section: When the Navy ship's force maintains control of the machinery, equipment, or systems on a vessel and has implemented such additional measures it determines are necessary, the provisions of paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of this section shall not apply, provided that the employer complies with the verification procedures in paragraph (g) of this section. Note to paragraph (c)(7) of this section: When the Navy ship's force serves as the lockout/tags-plus coordinator and maintains control of the lockout/tags-plus log, the employer will be in compliance with the requirements in paragraph (c)(7) of this section when coordination between the ship's force and the employer occurs to ensure that applicable lockout/tags-plus procedures are followed and documented. 2 Note to paragraph (e) of this section: When the Navy ship's force shuts down any machinery, equipment, or system, and relieves, disconnects, restrains, or otherwise renders safe all potentially hazardous energy that is connected to the machinery, equipment, or system, the employer will be in compliance with the requirements in paragraph (e) of this section when the employer's authorized employee verifies that the machinery, equipment, or system being serviced has been properly shut down, isolated, and deenergized.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Identification
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Issuing Date: 13-Aug-2020 Revision date 13-Aug-2020 Revision Number 1 1. IDENTIFICATION Product Name Tide PODS Spring Meadow Product Identifier 91943772_RET_NG Product Type: Finished Product - Retail Recommended use Detergent. Restrictions on use Use only as directed on label. Synonyms C-91943772-005 Details of the supplier of the safety PROCTER & GAMBLE - Fabric and Home Care Division data sheet Ivorydale Technical Centre 5289 Spring Grove Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45217-1087 USA Procter & Gamble Inc. P.O. Box 355, Station A Toronto, ON M5W 1C5 1-800-331-3774 E-mail Address [email protected] Emergency Telephone Transportation (24 HR) CHEMTREC - 1-800-424-9300 (U.S./ Canada) or 1-703-527-3887 Mexico toll free in country: 800-681-9531 2. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION "Consumer Products", as defined by the US Consumer Product Safety Act and which are used as intended (typical consumer duration and frequency), are exempt from the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). This SDS is being provided as a courtesy to help assist in the safe handling and proper use of the product. This product is classified under 29CFR 1910.1200(d) and the Canadian Hazardous Products Regulation as follows:. Hazard Category Acute toxicity - Oral Category 4 Eye Damage / Irritation Category 2B Signal word Warning Hazard statements Harmful if swallowed Causes eye irritation Hazard pictograms 91943772_RET_NG - Tide PODS Spring Meadow Revision date 13-Aug-2020 Precautionary Statements Keep container tightly closed Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces. — No smoking Wash hands thoroughly after handling Precautionary Statements - In case of fire: Use water, CO2, dry chemical, or foam for extinction Response IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Incidents During Anaesthesia a Small Percentage of Apparently Routine Anaesthetics Will End in an Anticipated Or Unforeseen Acute Incident
    Acute incidents during anaesthesia A small percentage of apparently routine anaesthetics will end in an anticipated or unforeseen acute incident. Edwin W Turton, MB ChB, Dip Pec (SA), DA (SA), MMed Anes, FCA (SA) Head of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Bloemfontein Hospitals Complex, Department of Anaesthesiology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein Dr Edwin Turton worked as a clinical fellow in cardiac anaesthesia at Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK, in 2009. His current fields of interest are adult and paediatric cardiac anaesthesia and peri-operative echocardiography, and focussed assessment through echocardiography in emergency care. Correspondence to: E W Turton ([email protected]) Anaesthesia is uneventful in the majority Although anaesthesia is a very well- • Antibiotics (2.6%) of cases but in a small percentage of controlled and governed discipline, acute • Benzodiazepines (2%) routine and emergency cases there will incidents do occur. Incidents can occur • Opioids (1.7%) be an anticipated or an unforeseen acute during induction, maintenance and • Other agents (e.g. radio contrast media) incident. These incidents need immediate emergence from anaesthesia. (2.5%). theoretical knowledge and clinical skills to be managed effectively and to The following acute critical incidents are Treatment and management prevent further morbidity and mortality. discussed in this article: • Stop administration of all suspected Therefore all providers of anaesthesia, • Anaphylaxis agents. at different levels of experience, should • Aspiration • Call for help. be able to provide basic and advanced • Laryngospasm • Airway must be secured and 100% cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).1 • High or total (complete) spinal blocks in oxygen given, and ensure adequate obstetric anaesthesia. ventilation. The first death associated with an anaesthetic • Intravenous or intramuscular adrenaline was reported in 1848 in the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment
    WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment Oregon OSHA Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment About this guide “Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment” is an Oregon OSHA Standards and Technical Resources Section publication. Piracy notice Reprinting, excerpting, or plagiarizing this publication is fine with us as long as it’s not for profit! Please inform Oregon OSHA of your intention as a courtesy. Table of contents What is a PPE hazard assessment ............................................... 2 Why should you do a PPE hazard assessment? .................................. 2 What are Oregon OSHA’s requirements for PPE hazard assessments? ........... 3 Oregon OSHA’s hazard assessment rules ....................................... 3 When is PPE necessary? ........................................................ 4 What types of PPE may be necessary? .......................................... 5 Table 1: Types of PPE ........................................................... 5 How to do a PPE hazard assessment ............................................ 8 Do a baseline survey to identify workplace hazards. 8 Evaluate your employees’ exposures to each hazard identified in the baseline survey ...............................................9 Document your hazard assessment ...................................................10 Do regular workplace inspections ....................................................11 What is a PPE hazard assessment A personal protective equipment (PPE) hazard assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
    Risk Assessment Guidance The assessor can assign values for the hazard severity (a) and likelihood of occurrence (b) (taking into account the frequency and duration of exposure) on a scale of 1 to 5, then multiply them together to give the rating band: Hazard Severity (a) Likelihood of Occurrence (b) 1 – Trivial (eg discomfort, slight bruising, self-help recovery) 1 – Remote (almost never) 2 – Minor (eg small cut, abrasion, basic first aid need) 2 – Unlikely (occurs rarely) 3 – Moderate (eg strain, sprain, incapacitation > 3 days) 3 – Possible (could occur, but uncommon) 4 – Serious (eg fracture, hospitalisation >24 hrs, incapacitation >4 4 – Likely (recurrent but not frequent) weeks) 5 – Very likely (occurs frequently) 5 – Fatal (single or multiple) The risk rating (high, medium or low) indicates the level of response required to be taken when designing the action plan. Trivial Minor Moderate Serious Fatal Rating Bands (a x b) Remote 1 2 3 4 5 LOW RISK MEDIUM RISK HIGH RISK (1 – 8) (9 - 12) (15 - 25) Unlikely 2 4 6 8 10 Continue, but Continue, but -STOP THE Possible review implement ACTIVITY- 3 6 9 12 15 periodically to additional Identify new ensure controls reasonably controls. Activity Likely remain effective practicable must not controls where 4 8 12 16 20 proceed until possible and risks are Very monitor regularly reduced to a low likely 5 10 15 20 25 or medium level 1 Risk Assessments There are a number of explanations needed in order to understand the process and the form used in this example: HAZARD: Anything that has the potential to cause harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Permits-To-Work in the Process Industries
    SYMPOSIUM SERIES NO. 151 # 2006 IChemE PERMITS-TO-WORK IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES John Gould Environmental Resources Management, Suite 8.01, 8 Exchange Quay, Manchester M5 3EJ; [email protected] The paper presents the collective results from a number of Safety Management System audits. The audit protocol is based on the Health and Safety Executive pub- lication ‘Successful health and safety management’ and takes into account formal (written) and informal procedures as well as their implementation. Focused on permit-to-work systems, these have shown a number of common failings. The most common failure in implementing a permit-to-work system is the issue of too many permits. However, the audit protocol considers the whole risk control system. The failure to ‘close’ the management loop with an effective regular review process is the largest obstacle to an effective permit system. INTRODUCTION ‘Permits save lives – give them proper attention’. This is a startling statement made by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in its free leaflet IND(G) 98 (Rev 3) PTW systems. The leaflet goes on to state that two thirds of all accidents in the chemical industry are main- tenance related, with the permit-to-work (PTW) failures being the largest single cause. Given these facts, it comes as no surprise that PTW systems are a key part in the provision of a safe working environment. Over the past four years Environmental Resources Management (ERM) has been auditing PTW systems as part of its key risk control systems audits. Numerous systems have been evaluated from a wide rage of industries, covering personal care products man- ufacturing to refinery operations.
    [Show full text]
  • (BSL-1) Inspection Checklist Agents
    PI: Lab Contact: Room(s): Inspected by: Research and Occupational Safety Date: Biological Safety Level 1 (BSL-1) Inspection Checklist Agents: References: CDC/NIH Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules UW Biosafety Manual Hazard Communication Notes Exposure Response Poster is in lab; lab staff is aware of proper procedures. yes no NA Facility Access to the lab is limited or restricted at the discretion of the PI when experiments are in progress. yes no NA The lab is designed so that it can be easily cleaned. Lab furniture is sturdy. Spaces between benches, cabinets, yes no NA and equipment are accessible for cleaning. Benchtops are impervious to water; chairs are covered with non-fabric material; no rugs or carpet are present. yes no NA Each lab contains a sink for hand washing. yes no NA Personnel wash their hands after handling biohazardous materials or animals and before exiting the yes no NA laboratory. Hand soap and paper towels are available at the sink. If the lab has windows that open, they are fitted with fly screens. yes no NA Exposure Control Smoking, chewing gum, handling contacts, applying cosmetics is not allowed in lab. No food or drinks yes no NA consumed or stored in the lab. Personnel wear clothing that covers the skin on legs (long pants or skirts) and closed-toe shoes. yes no NA Appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) is readily available. yes no NA Work surfaces are decontaminated once a day (following work) and after any spill of viable material.
    [Show full text]
  • Data and Information
    Exposure Data and Information NOAA Office for Coastal Management coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/tools/flood-exposure.html The following data were used in the Coastal Flood Exposure Mapper and in map services available for use in ArcGIS Online or other online mapping platforms. See ESRI’s ArcGIS Online Tutorial for instructions on using map services. Hazards Exposure Authoritative Name Description Map Service Significance Source Spatial extents of multiple flood hazard data sets combined. Flood hazard data sets include high tide flooding, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood Provides a quick data (V zones, A zones, and 500- Coastal Coastal Flood visual Coastal Flood year zones treated as individual Flood Hazard Exposure assessment of Hazard layers), storm surge inundation for Composite Mapper areas most Composite category 1, 2, and 3 hurricanes Map Service prone to flood (from FEMA Hurricane Evacuation hazard events. Studies), sea level rise scenarios for 1, 2, and 3 feet above mean higher high water (MHHW), and tsunami run-up zones where available. Page 1 of 7 Authoritative Name Description Map Service Significance Source Areas that flood when coastal flood warning thresholds are exceeded. Derived from the flood frequency layer within the Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Impacts Viewer. High Tide Sea Level Rise Areas subject to High Tide Flooding Viewer high tide Flooding For islands in the Caribbean and Map Service flooding. Pacific, the high tide flooding zones were mapped based on statistical analysis of water level observations at tidal stations in those areas. Digital FEMA flood data. The data represent the digital riverine and coastal flood zones available as of FEMA Flood FEMA’s Map FEMA Flood Areas at risk October 2017 and are a Zones Map Service Center Zones from flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Risk Management Guide
    OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE 2020 Last Updated 02/26/2020 RISK MANAGEMENT COUNCIL IN COOPERATION WITH THE OFFICE OF SAFETY & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH and THE NATIONAL AVIATION SAFETY COUNCIL Contents Contents ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. i Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 What is Operational Risk Management? ................................................................................................................... 1 The Terminology of ORM ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Principles of ORM Application ........................................................................................................................................... 6 The Five-Step ORM Process ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Step 1: Identify Hazards ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Developing the Safety Risk Management Component of a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan
    Guide to Developing the Safety Risk Management Component of a Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Overview The Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) regulation (49 C.F.R. Part 673) requires certain operators of public transportation systems that are recipients or subrecipients of FTA grant funds to develop Agency Safety Plans (ASP) including the processes and procedures necessary for implementing Safety Management Systems (SMS). Safety Risk Management (SRM) is one of the four SMS components. Each eligible transit operator must have an approved ASP meeting the regulation requirements by July 20, 2020. Safety Risk Management The SRM process requires understanding the differences between hazards, events, and potential consequences. SRM is an essential process within a transit The Sample SRM Definitions Checklist can support agencies agency’s SMS for identifying hazards and analyzing, as- with understanding and distinguishing between these sessing, and mitigating safety risk. Key terms, as de- terms when considering safety concerns and to help ad- fined in Part 673, include: dress Part 673 requirements while developing the SRM • Event–any accident, incident, or occurrence. section of their ASP. • Hazard–any real or potential condition that can cause injury, illness, or death; damage to or loss of the facilities, equipment, rolling stock, or infra- structure of a public transportation system; or damage to the environment. • Risk–composite of predicted severity and likeli- hood of the potential effect of a hazard. • Risk Mitigation–method(s) to eliminate or re- duce the effects of hazards. Sample SRM Definitions Checklist The following is not defined in Part 673. However, transit Part 673 requires transit agencies to develop and imple- agencies may choose to derive a definition from other text ment an SRM process for all elements of its public provided in Part 673, such as: transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • UKRIO Code of Practice for Research
    UK Research Integrity Office Code of Practice For Research Promoting good practice and preventing misconduct Code of Practice for Research © 2009 and 2021 UK Research Integrity Office Recommended Checklist for Researchers The Checklist lists the key points of good practice for a research project and is applicable to all subject areas. More detailed guidance is available in Section 3. A PDF version is available from our website. Code of Practice for Research © 2009 and 2021 UK Research Integrity Office Contents RECOMMENDED CHECKLIST FOR RESEARCHERS .............................. inside front cover 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 2. PRINCIPLES ....................................................................................................................... 4 3. STANDARDS FOR ORGANISATIONS AND RESEARCHERS ......................................... 6 3.1 General guidance on good practice in research ........................................................ 6 3.2 Leadership and supervision ........................................................................................ 7 3.3 Training and mentoring ................................................................................................ 7 3.4 Research design ........................................................................................................... 8 3.5 Collaborative working .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT Name(S) Or Person(S) Testing
    CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT Confined Space Location/Description/ID Number Date: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Purpose of Entry _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ Time In: ______________ Permit Canceled Time: _____________________________________ Time Out: ____________ Reason Permit Canceled: ___________________________________ Supervisor: ___________________________________________________________________________ Rescue and Emergency Services- Hazards of Confined Yes No Special Requirements Yes No Space Oxygen deficiency Hot Work Permit Required Combustible gas/vapor Lockout/Tagout Combustible dust Lines broken, capped, or blanked Carbon Monoxide Purge-flush and vent Hydrogen Sulfide Secure Area-Post and Flag Toxic gas/vapor Ventilation Toxic fumes Other- List: Skin- chemical hazards Special Equipment Electrical hazard Breathing apparatus- respirator Mechanical hazard Escape harness required Engulfment hazard Tripod emergency escape unit Entrapment hazard Lifelines Thermal hazard Lighting (explosive proof/low voltage) Slip or fall hazard PPE- goggles, gloves, clothing, etc. Fire Extinguisher Communication Procedures: DO NOT ENTER IF PERMISSABLE ENTRY Test Start and Stop Time: LEVELS ARE EXCEEDED Start Stop Permissable Entry Level % of Oxygen 19.5 % to 23.5 % % of LEL Less than 10% Carbon Monoxide 35 PPM (8 hr.) Hydrogen Sulfide 10 PPM (8 hr.)
    [Show full text]