DOCSLIB.ORG

Implementation of the Ramsar Convention in General and of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Implementation of the Ramsar Convention in general and of the Ramsar Strategic Plan 1997- 2002 in particular during the period since the National Report prepared in 1995 for Ramsar COP6 and 30 June 1998 Contracting Party: Ireland Designated Ramsar Administrative Authority Full name of the institution: National Parks & Wildlife, Dúchas The Heritage Service. Name and title of the head of the institution: Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht & Islands. Mailing address for the head of the institution: Dún Aimhirgin. 43 -49 Mespil Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Telephone: 353 1 6670788 Fax: 353 1 6670825 Email: [email protected] Name and title of the designated contact officer for Ramsar Convention matters: Mr. James Ryan. National Parks & Wildlife Service, 51 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2. Telephone: 353 1 6616111 Fax; 353 1 6620283 Email: [email protected] Ramsar Strategic Plan - General Objective 1 To progress towards universal membership of the Convention. 1.1 Ireland, to date has not taken any actions to encourage others to join the Convention. Ramsar Strategic Plan _ General Objective 2 To achieve the wise use of wetlands by implementing and further developing the Ramsar Wise Use Guidelines. 2.1(a) There has been is no specific wetland policy developed in Ireland. However Ireland aims to be actively involved in the development and implementation of the EU Commission's strategic framework for a policy of wise use and conservation of wetland. It is envisaged that wise use will be achieved within the context of the National Sustainable Development Strategy published by the Irish Government in 1997. Environmental policy in Ireland is now based on the internationally recognised principles of sustainability, the precautionary principle the integration of environmental considerations into all policy area, the polluter-pays principle and the principle of shared responsibility for environmental protection by public bodies, private enterprises and the general public. A priority for the strategy is to maintain the quality, quantity and diversity of our natural endowments which include wetlands. (b. ) The National Sustainable Development Strategy is a government initiative with the Department of Environment as the lead Department. The nature conservation elements of that strategy, including wetland conservation are the responsibility of the Department of Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht and the Islands ( D.A.H.G.I.) which is thus responsible for Ramsar matters. ( c.) D.A.H.G.I. is the lead Department in the production of the National Biodiversity Plan which will deal specifically with wetland conservation issues including those requiring cross-sector initiatives. It is also producing a National Heritage Plan which will focus more on the contribution to be made by the Dúchas, The Heritage Service to conservation of the natural and man made heritage. The implementation of these plans in relation to wetlands conservation will initially be via national regulations associated with the Birds and Habitat Directives for internationally important sites and the amended Wildlife Act for all other sites. Progress towards implementation. Implementation of those aspects of the national sustainable development strategy to wetland protection are as follows; (a) Climate Change. It is considered that climate change could have major implications for Ireland's wetlands because of its effect on hydrology and on carbon storage in peatlands, our most extensive terrestrial wetland type. There are some indications already that rainfall amounts and intensity are increasing, possibly due to global climate change, leading to increased flooding and consequently to increased pressure for drainage to alleviate those impacts. Ireland has now signed the Kyoto Protocol and, as part of the overall EU commitment, has agreed to limit its growth in greenhouse gas emissions to 13% above 1990 levels in comparison to a conservative business as usual projection for 2010 of a 25-28.35% rise. The Department of Public Enterprise published a study on the ' Limitation and Reduction of CO2 ' and other Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Ireland, in June, 1998 to assist in the preparation of a comprehensive national strategy to meet our commitments. Following submissions from the public and a Discussion Forum in October 1998 the Minister for Environment and Local Government is developing the national Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategy for Government approval. It is considered that the current very high rates of economic growth will present significant challenges to the achievement of Ireland objectives for greenhouses gas emission control. (b) Water Quality. Between 1971 and 1994 there has been an decrease in the length of seriously polluted rivers, however, there has also been a significant decrease of unpolluted river length and an major increase in the slight to moderately polluted length. Levels in 1994 are 71.2% unpolluted. 28.2% slight to moderate pollution and 0.67% seriously polluted. Equivalent figures for a sample of 135 lakes show 23% now showing eutrophication problems. The underlying trend of deterioration has continued into this reporting period. It is thought that this pattern is due to the improved water treatment of point source discharges of sewage and industrial wastes reducing the area affected by serious pollution being offset by eutrophication due to small point source and diffuse discharges. To counteract this trend a major catchment based initiative the detailed aims of which was set out in 'Managing Ireland Rivers and Lakes' was launched by the Department of Environment and Local Government in 1997. This initiative is being co-funded through the EU Cohesion fund and now involves 5 water catchments in addition to the Shannon Catchment, which is by far the largest catchment in Ireland. These schemes will cost in the region of £120 million primarily on investment on wastewater infrastructure including phosphorous removal. The minimum aims of the initiative are briefly within 10 years. (a) To avoid any further disimprovement in surface water quality. (b) To improve all seriously polluted river stretches to at least moderately polluted status. (c) To improve rivers channels suffering from slight or moderate pollution by one increment on the Biological Quality Rating Index. (d) To improve all eutrophic or hypertrophic lakes to mesotrophic or eutrophicic status respectively. The long term objective is to return all lakes and rivers to a non-polluted status i.e. at least mesotrophic status or to oligotrophic status if that was their original condition. The main indicators for assessing achievement of there objections are the Biological Quality Rating Index ( based on invertebrates ) for rivers, Trophic Status Index for lakes and associated specified phosphorus concentrations. The target levels for both lakes and rivers have been formally adapted under Regulation (S.I. No. 258 of 1998 Local Government ( Water Pollution )) Act 1997 (Water Quality Standards for Phosphorus) ( Regulations 1998 ). In general unless local conditions dictate otherwise the fishery objective use category adopted will be at for salmonid water quality. A discussion document on the establishment of environmental quality objectives for the aquatic environment has been published by the EPA and they are also carrying out work on environmental indicators. Acidification of waters due to air pollution is generally not a problem in Ireland except in some upland areas on the east coast. However, there is concern that conifer afforestation on poorly buffered soils and peats can give rise to lowered pH. and increase aluminium levels which impact adversely on fish and invertebrate populations. In addition inappropriate or poorly planned afforestation, associated drainage and clear felling can give rise to increased erosion and sedimentation. These problems have lead to the production of guidelines on forestry in relation to fisheries and landscape and the identification of acid sensitive areas for fisheries. These guidelines are currently being reviewed. Grant aid for private afforestation is contingent on adherence to the guidelines. The EPA has established a working group to review research on the impact of afforestation on water quality and the effectiveness of existing guidelines in protecting sensitive surface waters against acidification and enrichment. This work will be considered in revised guidelines for afforestation. The protection of water quality is an important consideration in the development of '' Codes of Best Forest Practice'' associated with the proposed national sustainable forestry plan which is now being developed. In estuarine, and coastal and marine areas of Ireland pollution and eutrophication are usually localised and often of short duration. These problems usually arise from land based discharges, mainly of sewage or industrial origin, dumping from ships or, on a very localised basis, from aquacultural activities. Ireland ratified the convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North East Atlantic ( the OSPAR convention) in 1998. This requires contracting parties to take all possible steps to prevent and eliminate pollution of the marine environment. As required under the Convention a Quality Status Report for the Irish and Celtic seas and the seas west of Scotland and Ireland is being prepared in co-operation with the U.K.. The Dumping at Sea Act 1996 is now regulating all dumping at sea and sewage sludge disposal at sea is being discontinued. Under the Harbours Act 1996
Recommended publications
  • The Pond Manifesto

    The Pond Manifesto

    The Pond Manifesto Contents 1 About this document . 5 2 Why protect ponds? . .6 2.1 Overview . .6 2.2 The pond resource . .6 2.3 Pond biodiversity value . .8 2.4 Pond cultural and social value . .10 2.5 Pond economic value and ecosystem services . .12 3 Threats to Ponds . .14 4 Strategy for the conservation of ponds in Europe . .16 4.1 Policy and legislation . .17 4.2 Research and monitoring . .17 4.3 Communication and awareness raising . .18 4.4 Conservation of the pond resource . .19 5 Conclusion: pond conservation is an opportunity . .19 This document sets out the case for the conservation of ponds in a straightforward and convincing manner Acknowledgements Thank you to the very many people who have contributed to the Pond Manifesto, and to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and the MAVA Foundation for their support. Thank you also to all the photographers for the use of their images (a list of photographers is available on the EPCN website: www.europeanponds.org) © European Pond Conservation Network 2008 2 Foreword The importance of maintaining global freshwater biodiversity and ensuring its sustainable use cannot be over-emphasised. Wetland ecosystems, including the associated waterbodies, come in all shapes and sizes and all have a role to play. The larger ones, perhaps inevitably, have enjoyed the most attention – it is easy to overlook the many small waterbodies scattered across the landscape. Fortunately, over the last decade, our knowledge and attitude towards small wetlands like ponds has begun to change. We know now that they are crucial for biodiversity This and can also provide a whole range of ecosystem services.
  • Global Peatland Restoration Manual

    Global Peatland Restoration Manual

    Global Peatland Restoration Manual Martin Schumann & Hans Joosten Version April 18, 2008 Comments, additions, and ideas are very welcome to: [email protected] [email protected] Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Germany Introduction The following document presents a science based and practical guide to peatland restoration for policy makers and site managers. The work has relevance to all peatlands of the world but focuses on the four core regions of the UNEP-GEF project “Integrated Management of Peatlands for Biodiversity and Climate Change”: Indonesia, China, Western Siberia, and Europe. Chapter 1 “Characteristics, distribution, and types of peatlands” provides basic information on the characteristics, the distribution, and the most important types of mires and peatlands. Chapter 2 “Functions & impacts of damage” explains peatland functions and values. The impact of different forms of damage on these functions is explained and the possibilities of their restoration are reviewed. Chapter 3 “Planning for restoration” guides users through the process of objective setting. It gives assistance in questions of strategic and site management planning. Chapter 4 “Standard management approaches” describes techniques for practical peatland restoration that suit individual needs. Unless otherwise indicated, all statements are referenced in the IPS/IMCG book on Wise Use of Mires and Peatlands (Joosten & Clarke 2002), that is available under http://www.imcg.net/docum/wise.htm Contents 1 Characteristics,
  • The Virginia Wetlands Report Vol. 12, No. 2

    The Virginia Wetlands Report Vol. 12, No. 2

    W&M ScholarWorks Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia Wetlands Reports (CCRM) Summer 7-1-1997 The Virginia Wetlands Report Vol. 12, No. 2 Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccrmvawetlandreport Part of the Environmental Education Commons Recommended Citation Virginia Institute of Marine Science, "The Virginia Wetlands Report Vol. 12, No. 2" (1997). Virginia Wetlands Reports. 28. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/ccrmvawetlandreport/28 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Coastal Resources Management (CCRM) at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Virginia Wetlands Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Summer 1997 TheThe VirginiaVirginia Vol. 12, No. 2 WetlandsWetlands ReportReport Wetlands Mitigation Banks: Creating Big Wetlands to Compensate for Many Small Losses Carl Hershner etlands mitigation banking is a acres each year. When you realize that wetland if at all possible. Relocating relatively new tool for wetlands new tidal wetlands are not appearing development on a parcel of land, or managers.W It is finding increasing naturally at a rate anywhere close to redesigning a project can often pre- application in the struggle to achieve a the rate of loss caused by man and serve the existing resource. When “no net loss” goal for our remaining nature, this “preventable” loss becomes avoidance is not possible, minimizing wetland resources. The concept of a concern. the area of impact is always the second creating wetlands and thus establish- The problem confronting resource objective.
  • Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention

    Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention

    Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity edited by A. J. Hails Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest, India 1996 [1997] Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, with the support of: • the General Directorate of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Belgium • the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark • the National Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Denmark • the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India • the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Sweden Copyright © Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997. Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior perinission from the copyright holder, providing that full acknowledgement is given. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The views of the authors expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of the Ramsar Convention Bureau or of the Ministry of the Environment of India. Note: the designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ranasar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation: Halls, A.J. (ed.), 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity.
  • The Ramsar Convention and National Laws and Policies for Wetlands in India

    The Ramsar Convention and National Laws and Policies for Wetlands in India

    THE RAMSAR CONVENTION AND NATIONAL LAWS AND POLICIES FOR WETLANDS IN INDIA Devaki Panini Case Study prepared for the Technical Consultation on Designing Methodologies to Review Laws and Institutions Relevant to Wetlands Gland, Switzerland 3-4 July 1998 The Ramsar Convention is a historical Convention in many respects particularly as it is one of the oldest ecosystem specific Conventions that speaks of wise use of wetlands and not conservation alone. It also enjoins the Parties to the Convention to formulate and implement their planning so as to promote the conservation of listed wetlands and as far as possible, the wise use of wetlands in their territory (Art 3.1). The review of legal and institutional issues related to wise use of wetlands is mandated further by the Additional Guidance for the implementation of the wise use concept (I-2 of the Additional Guidance). However, at least in the case of India, it would be accurate to say that the review of legal and institutional issues has received little attention by the decision makers in the country. On the other hand, India joined the Convention in 1981 and has six listed sites (Keoladeo National Park, Chilika Lake, Loktak Lake, Wular Lake, Harike Lake and Sambhar Lake). Three sites are already on the Montreux record (Keoladeo National Park. Chilika Lake and Loktak Lake) thus making it imperative to examine the legal and institutional aspects of wetlands management in the country. There are several underlying reasons for this lack of effort by the concerned Government agency to review the legal systems concerning wise use of wetlands.
  • The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: Its History and Development by G

    The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: Its History and Development by G

    The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: its History and Development by G. V. T. Matthews Re-issued Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2013 The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: its History and Development by G. V. T. Matthews (Ramsar, 1993) Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland. © Copyright: 1993 Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. ISBN No. 2-940073-00-7 Edited by: Erika Luthi, Ramsar Printed by: Imprimerie Dupuis SA, CH-1348 Le Brassus, Switzerland. Cover and centre part: Apple Fields, CH-1147 Montricher, Switzerland. Available from: Ramsar Bureau, 28 rue Mauverney, CH-l 196 Gland, Switzerland. The designations of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ramsar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. For this 2013 re-issue of the 1993 edition, no alterations have been made to the original text. Prof Matthews’ figures and descriptions concerning the state of the Convention in 1993 may be updated by reference to the Ramsar website, http://www.ramsar.org. The Ramsar Convention
  • The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

    The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

    NATIONAL WETLANDS NEWSLETTER, vol. 29, no. 2. Copyright © 2007 Environmental Law Institute.® Washington D.C., USA.Reprinted by permission of the National Wetlands Newsletter. To subscribe, call 800-433-5120, write [email protected], or visit http://www.eli.org/nww. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: Assessment of International Designations Within the United States The Ramsar Convention is an international framework used to protect wetlands. At this time, the United States has 22 designated sites listed as wetlands of international importance. In this Article, the authors analyze survey data collected from each of these 22 sites to determine whether and how Ramsar designation benefits these wetland areas. BY ROYAL C. GARDNER AND KIM DIANA CONNOLLY ssues related to wetlands and wetland protection often involve engage in international cooperation.6 Its nonregulatory approach boundaries. Sometimes the lines are drawn on the ground, has led some to ask what benefits are associated with Ramsar des- delineating between so-called “jurisdictional” wetlands and ignation. For example, the United States has a maze of federal, uplands. Sometimes the boundaries are conceptual: trying state, and local laws that protect wetlands, so does the international Ito determine the proper relationship between the federal and state recognition of a site provide any additional returns? To answer governments with respect to wetland permits, or trying to balance this question, we surveyed all 22 U.S. Ramsar sites.7 Although the the need to protect the aquatic environment without inappropri- results varied from site to site, we found that Ramsar designation ately limiting activities on private property. Other times interna- adds some value to all sites.
  • Turbary Restoration Meets Variable Success: Does Landscape Structure Force Colonization Success of Wetland Plants?

    Turbary Restoration Meets Variable Success: Does Landscape Structure Force Colonization Success of Wetland Plants?

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Turbary Restoration Meets Variable Success: Does Landscape Structure Force Colonization Success of Wetland Plants? Boudewijn Beltman,1,2 NancyQ.A.Omtzigt,3 and Jan E. Vermaat3 Abstract of ponds in the complex, the SW orientation of ditches in these complexes and pH, and transparency of the water. Peat ponds have been restored widely in the Netherlands Age of the ponds (1–9 years), area of open water (8–42%), to enhance the available habitat for species-rich plant and shoreline density (13–43 km/km2 in the complex) did communities that characterize the early succession stages not contribute significantly to colonization success. Separa- toward land. Colonization success of 33 target aquatic tion of the effect of a species-rich surrounding landscape, species has been quantified in eight complexes of new the possibility to disperse through that landscape, the spa- ponds. It has been related to the lay-out of these ponds, the tial lay-out of the complex and transparency of the water structure of the surrounding landscape, (historic) preva- were precluded by the strong covariance along the first PC. lence of source populations within the complex and within a Probably all three are independently important. It is spec- perimeter of 10 km, and pond water quality. Colonization ulated that diel migration by waterfowl may be responsible success was variable: between 6 and 26 target species had for the dispersal of plant propagules to the pond complex, reached the complexes in 1998. This success was coupled whereas within-complex dispersal to establishment sites is to the first principal component (PC) in a principal compo- enhanced by wind and water movement.
  • National Peatlands Strategy

    National Peatlands Strategy

    NATIONAL PEATLANDS STRATEGY 2015 National Parks & Wildlife Service 7 Ely Place, Dublin 2, D02 TW98, Ireland t: +353-1-888 3242 e: [email protected] w: www.npws.ie Main Cover photograph: Derrinea Bog, Co. Roscommon Photographs courtesy of: NPWS, Bord na Móna, Coillte, RPS, Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, National Library of Ireland, Friends of the Irish Environment and the IPCC. MANAGING IRELAND’S PEATLANDS A National Peatlands Strategy 2015 Roundstone Bog, Co. Galway CONTENTS PART 1 PART 3 1 INTRODUCTION 004 6 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING 060 1.1 Peatlands in Ireland 005 1.2 Protected Peatlands in Ireland 007 APPENDICES 2 THE CHANGING VIEW APPENDIX 1 OF IRISH PEATLANDS 008 SUMMARY OF PRINCIPLES 2.1 A New Understanding 009 AND ACTIONS 062 2.2 Seeking Balance between Traditional and Hidden Values 009 2.3 Turf cutting controversy – APPENDIX 2 a catalyst for change 011 GLOSSARY 070 2.4 The Way Forward 013 APPENDIX 3 PART 2 EU DIRECTIVES REFERRED TO IN THE STRATEGY 076 3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE STRATEGY 014 APPENDIX 4 4 VISION AND VALUES 018 LINKS & FURTHER INFORMATION 080 5 MANAGING OUR PEATLANDS: PRINCIPLES, POLICIES AND ACTIONS 024 5.1 Overview 024 5.2 Existing Uses 025 5.3 Peatlands and Climate Change 034 5.4 Air Quality 036 5.5 Protected Peatlands Sites 037 5.6 Peatlands outside Protected Sites 045 5.7 Responsible Exploitation 048 5.8 Restoration & Rehabilitation of Non-Designated Sites 050 5.9 Water Quality, Water Framework Directive and Flooding 050 5.10 Public Awareness & Education 055 5.11 Tourism & Recreational Use 058 5.12 Unauthorised Dumping 059 5.13 Research 059 PART 1 004 1.
  • Peat Places Peat Today

    Peat Places Peat Today

    Rathlin Island Peat places Tievebulliagh Carrick-a-rede The Glens of Antrim contain Garron Plateau many places where peat can The Garron Plateau is the biggest area of This upland area contains shallow peat. be found. The map highlights Knocklayde Ballintoy intact blanket bog on the east coast of Ireland. A rare rock known as porcellanite was peat places to explore. The site is rich with varieties of plants and wildlife. harvested here during the stone age and exported throughout Europe. Garron Plateau has undergone an extensive restoration project. Ballycastle Fairhead Special peat places Access from Cargan village, 10 miles north of Moyle Way Areas of Outstanding Ballymena on the Glenravel Road (A43) and eight Natural Beauty (AONB) miles south of Cushendall. Car parking is available at Dungonnell Dam, near Cargan village. Tow River Carey River Areas of Special Scientific Interest (ASSI) Glentasie Ballycastle Ramsar Wetland Sites of international importance Forest Special Protection Areas (SPA) Glenmakeeran River Glenshesk River Glenshesk Slieveanorra & Croaghan Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) Ballypatrick Moyle Way Forest National Nature Reserves (NNR) View from Glenaan Slieveanorra and Croaghan is an important Glenshesk Cregagh area of largely intact blanket bog. Slieveanorra Peat Areas Mountain shows the different stages in the Wood View from Tievebulliagh Armoy Non Peat Areas formation, erosion and regeneration of peat. Breen Cushendun Garron Plateau Ronan's Way AONB boundary line A variety of plants and upland birds can be Wood spotted, as can the common lizard. Main Roads Croaghan Breen Mountain Slieveanorra was the site of the Battle Glendun Forest Walk Glencorp Walking Routes Through Peatland of Orra in 1583.
  • SC54-Com.16 (21.13) Draft Resolution on Promoting the Conservation And

    SC54-Com.16 (21.13) Draft Resolution on Promoting the Conservation And

    THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS 54th Meeting of the Standing Committee Gland, Switzerland, 23–27 April 2018 SC54-Com.16 (21.13) Draft resolution on promoting the conservation and wise-use of intertidal wetlands and ecologically-associated habitats Submitted by the Philippines Action requested: • The Standing Committee is invited to review the attached Draft Resolution for consideration by the 13th meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Draft Resolution XIII.xx Promoting the conservation and wise-use of intertidal wetlands and ecologically-associated habitats Mandate 1. RECALLING that the Conference of Parties has repeatedly addressed, inter alia through Resolutions listed in Annex 1, the pressing need to better promote the conservation and wiseuse of coastal wetlands, in particular intertidal wetlands1 which are areas of special importance yet highly vulnerable; 2. NOTING that Target 6 of Ramsar’s Strategic Plan 2016-21 seeks a significant increase in the areal extent of the Ramsar Site network in particular the inclusion of under-represented types of wetlands; and NOTING ALSO that both shellfish reefs and seagrass beds are under-represented wetlands; 3. AWARE that [all but one coastal country is] Parties[y] to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) [and thus] have adopted the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, of which Targets 5, 6, 11, 12, 14 and 15 are particularly relevant; 1 Intertidal wetlands and ecologically associated habitats include inter-tidal flats, seagrass beds, mangroves, bivalve (shellfish) reefs, and associated coastal habitats ecologically linked to these areas, for example saltpans/salinas, fishponds, area used for aquaculture and mariculture, sewage works, and other habitats used by coastal waterbirds for feeding and roosting.
  • The Ramsar Site Network and Biodiversity Conservation

    The Ramsar Site Network and Biodiversity Conservation

    The Ramsar Site Network and Biodiversity Conservation Biodiversity has globally come HE LIST OF WETLANDS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE AS A under increasing pressure NETWORK OF SIGNIFICANT BIODIVERSITY AREAS. The Ramsar from a range of factors such Convention is the only multilateral environment agreement focused as habitat fragmentation, T on wetlands. The Convention provides a framework for national action and development imperatives and international cooperation for the conservation and wise use of wetlands and global warming. Populations their resources. Entered into force in 1975, the Convention predates the three of several wetland-dependent Rio Conventions - the Convention on Biological Diversity, the United Nations species are declining. The Framework Convention on Climate Change and the United Nations Convention Ramsar Convention on to Combat Desertification, and thus is amongst the oldest multilateral Wetlands introduced the environmental agreement. Ramsar List as a mechanism for creating an international Ramsar List is one of the three Convention pillars. The vision for creating this network of wetlands, which List is to ‘develop and maintain an international network of wetlands which are when sustainably managed, important for the conservation of global biological diversity and for sustaining lead to the conservation of human life through the maintenance of their ecosystem components, processes global biodiversity and support and benefits/services’. The Secretariat works with Contracting Parties, human well-being. International Organization Partners (IOPs) and other stakeholders towards As India prepares to add more establishing a national network of Ramsar Sites which represent the diversity of wetlands to the Ramsar List, wetlands and their key hydrological and ecological functions, and contribute to Dr Ritesh Kumar (Director, maintaining global biological diversity through the designation and management Wetlands International South of appropriate wetland sites.