Bootstrapping Scattering Amplitudes in Effective Field Theories

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bootstrapping Scattering Amplitudes in Effective Field Theories Bootstrapping Scattering Amplitudes in Effective Field Theories by Shruti Paranjape A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Physics) in the University of Michigan 2021 Doctoral Committee: Professor Henriette Elvang, Chair Professor Ratindranath Akhoury Professor Finn Larsen Professor Jianming Qian Professor David Speyer Shruti Paranjape [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2613-718X © Shruti Paranjape 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without the mentorship, support, friendship and care I have received from many wonderful people. At the top of that list is Henriette Elvang, my PhD advisor who gave me time and room to grow and learn. I am grateful to her for her unwavering support, impeccable guidance and great textbook. I am indebted to my brilliant collaborators: Henriette Elvang, Callum Jones, Marios Hadjiantonis, Laura Johnson, Finn Larsen, Aidan Herderschee and Huan-Hang Chi. Through them, I have been introduced to new ideas and new physics. They kept my interests piqued and knowledge fresh. The Leinweber Center for Theoretical Physics has provided an amazing environment. I am grateful for the many opportunities, visitors and courses that it has hosted. I am particularly grateful to the faculty and fellow graduate students for stimulating journal clubs and discussions. I am grateful to my masters thesis advisor Gautam Mandal who was my gateway into research in quantum field theory and spent time teaching me a lot of physics. I would like to take a moment to acknowledge all the incredible women physicists I have known: Henriette Elvang, Suneeta Vardarajan, Nabamita Banerjee and my mother, Sudeshna Sinha, who were inspirational to say the least. Thanks to my friends, near and far: Kalyanee, Josh, Callum, Brian, Noah and Marina. You have been a constant source of happiness. To Ashish, my biggest cheerleader, your love and support mean more than I can express. To Ma and Pa, who taught me to do what I love, gave me everything and asked for nothing. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................... ii List of Figures ....................................... vii List of Tables ........................................ viii List of Appendices ..................................... x Abstract ........................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................... 1 1.1 On-Shell Methods in Quantum Field Theory..................7 1.2 Effective Field Theory of Goldstone Modes..................9 1.3 D-Brane Effective Actions: Galileons and Born-Infeld Photons........ 12 1.4 Loop Techniques and Anomalous Symmetries................. 15 1.5 The Double Copy................................ 16 2 Soft Bootstrap and Supersymmetry ......................... 19 2.1 Introducing Exceptional EFTs......................... 19 2.2 Exceptional EFTs Studied........................... 22 2.3 Structure of the Effective Action........................ 24 2.4 Subtracted Recursion Relations......................... 26 2.4.1 Holomorphic Soft Limits and Low-Energy Theorems......... 27 2.4.2 Review of Soft Subtracted Recursion Relations............ 27 iii 2.4.3 Validity Criterion............................ 29 2.4.4 Non-Constructibility = Triviality.................... 32 2.4.5 Implementation of the Subtracted Recursion Relations........ 34 2.5 Soft Bootstrap.................................. 37 2.5.1 Pure Scalar EFTs............................ 37 2.5.2 Pure Fermion EFTs........................... 40 2.5.3 Pure Vector EFTs............................ 41 2.6 Soft Limits and Supersymmetry........................ 43 2.6.1 N = 1 Supersymmetry Ward Identities................ 43 2.6.2 Soft Limits and Supermultiplets.................... 44 2.6.3 Application to Superconformal Symmetry Breaking......... 47 2.6.4 Application to Supergravity...................... 48 2.6.5 MHV Classification and Examples of Supersymmetry Ward Identities 49 2.7 Supersymmetric Non-linear Sigma Model................... 51 1 2.7.1 N = 1 CP NLSM........................... 52 1 2.7.2 N = 2 CP NLSM........................... 55 2.8 Super Dirac-Born-Infeld and Super Born-Infeld................ 62 2.9 Galileons.................................... 62 2.9.1 Galileons and Supersymmetry..................... 63 2.9.2 Vector-Scalar Special Galileon..................... 65 2.9.3 Higher Derivative Corrections to the Special Galileon........ 67 2.9.4 Comparison with the Field Theory KLT Relations.......... 69 3 All-Multiplicity One-Loop Amplitudes in Born-Infeld Electrodynamics from Gen- eralized Unitarity ................................... 73 3.1 Special Features of Born-Infeld Theory.................... 73 3.2 Overview of Method.............................. 76 3.2.1 Generalized Unitarity and Supersymmetric Decomposition...... 77 3.2.2 Massive Scalar Extension of Born-Infeld............... 82 3.3 Calculating mDBI4 Tree Amplitudes...................... 86 3.3.1 General Structure............................ 86 3.3.2 T-Duality and Low-Energy Theorems................. 89 3.4 All Multiplicity Rational One-Loop Amplitudes................ 94 3.4.1 Diagrammatic Rules for Constructing Loop Integrands........ 94 iv 3.4.2 Self-Dual Sector............................ 95 3.4.3 Next-to-Self-Dual Sector........................ 99 3.5 Discussion.................................... 106 4 Electromagnetic Duality and D3-Brane Scattering Amplitudes Beyond Leading Order .......................................... 110 4.1 Electromagnetic Duality in Born-Infeld Theory................ 110 4.1.1 Review of D3-Brane Worldvolume EFTs............... 112 4.2 Dimensional Oxidation: the D3-brane and M2-Brane............. 115 4.2.1 World-Volume Analysis........................ 115 4.2.2 3d ! 4d Oxidation: Contact Terms.................. 118 4.2.3 3d ! 4d Oxidation: Subtracted Recursion Relations......... 120 4.2.4 Higher Derivative Corrections..................... 122 4.3 Loop Amplitudes from BCJ Double-Copy................... 125 4.3.1 Tree-level BCJ Double-Copy of BI.................. 126 4.3.2 1-loop 4-point Self-Dual Amplitude as a Double-Copy........ 127 4.4 1-loop SD and NSD Amplitudes from Unitarity................ 131 4.4.1 4-point and Counterterm........................ 131 4.4.2 n-point................................. 132 4.5 Supersymmetric (D)BI and MHV Amplitudes at 1-loop............ 134 4.5.1 Supersymmetric Born-Infeld...................... 134 4.5.2 All-Multiplicity 1-loop MHV Amplitudes in N = 4 DBI....... 135 4.5.3 1-loop MHV in BI with N -Fold SUSY and Counterterms...... 137 4.6 Rational Loop Amplitudes and Finite Counterterms.............. 139 4.7 Higher Derivative Corrections as a Double-Copy............... 145 4.7.1 KLT Double-Copy........................... 145 4.7.2 Higher-Derivative Corrections to Born-Infeld............. 146 4.7.3 Comparison with the String Theory Effective Action......... 149 4.8 Discussion.................................... 150 4.8.1 Open Questions............................. 150 4.8.2 Supergravity: Double-Copy and Symmetry Oxidation........ 153 5 Constraints on a Massive Double-Copy and Applications to Massive Gravity .. 157 5.1 A Massive BCJ Double Copy.......................... 157 5.2 Massive KLT Formula............................. 163 v 5.2.1 Equivalence of Massive BCJ and Massive KLT............ 163 5.2.2 Spurious Singularities......................... 168 5.3 Massive Gravity and (Massive Yang-Mills)2 .................. 171 5.3.1 Physical Motivation.......................... 171 5.3.2 3-point Amplitudes and Asymptotic States.............. 174 5.3.3 4-point Amplitudes and High Energy Behavior............ 176 5.3.4 5-point Amplitudes and Non-Physical Singularities.......... 180 5.4 Locality and the Spectral Condition...................... 182 5.4.1 4-point Spectral Condition....................... 183 5.4.2 5-point Spectral Conditions...................... 189 5.4.3 Non-minimal Rank........................... 192 5.5 Discussion.................................... 192 Appendices ......................................... 195 Bibliography ........................................ 272 vi LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 3.1 Some key-properties of BI amplitudes at tree-level, in particular the double-copy construction and 4d electromagnetic duality. The idea behind the T-duality constraint [1] is that when dimensionally reduced along one direction, a linear combination of the photon polarizations become a scalar modulus of the compactified direction,. i.e. it is the Goldstone mode of the spontaneously broken translational symmetry and as such it must have enhanced O(p2) soft behavior.................. 75 3.2 Dimensional reduction commutes with the KLT product. This provides us with two alternative approaches to mDBI4........................... 86 O.1 Color-dressed tree-level 5-point amplitude organized using graphs with only cubic vertices........................................ 258 vii LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.1 The table shows the tree-level double-copy A ⊗ B of a selection of different choices for the A and B single-color models. BAS is the cubic bi-adjoint scalar model. The other single-color models are χPT = chiral perturbation theory (NLSM), YM = Yang-Mills theory, and N = 4 super Yang Mills theory (sYM). For the results of the double-copy, sGal stands for the special Galileon, BI is Born-Infeld theory, gravity+ is Einstein gravity with a dilaton and antisymmetric 2-form, and SG stands for supergravity.................................... 18
Recommended publications
  • Beyond Feynman Diagrams Lecture 2
    Beyond Feynman Diagrams Lecture 2 Lance Dixon Academic Training Lectures CERN April 24-26, 2013 Modern methods for trees 1. Color organization (briefly) 2. Spinor variables 3. Simple examples 4. Factorization properties 5. BCFW (on-shell) recursion relations Beyond Feynman Diagrams Lecture 2 April 25, 2013 2 How to organize gauge theory amplitudes • Avoid tangled algebra of color and Lorentz indices generated by Feynman rules structure constants • Take advantage of physical properties of amplitudes • Basic tools: - dual (trace-based) color decompositions - spinor helicity formalism Beyond Feynman Diagrams Lecture 2 April 25, 2013 3 Color Standard color factor for a QCD graph has lots of structure constants contracted in various orders; for example: Write every n-gluon tree graph color factor as a sum of traces of matrices T a in the fundamental (defining) representation of SU(Nc): + all non-cyclic permutations Use definition: + normalization: Beyond Feynman Diagrams Lecture 2 April 25, 2013 4 Double-line picture (’t Hooft) • In limit of large number of colors Nc, a gluon is always a combination of a color and a different anti-color. • Gluon tree amplitudes dressed by lines carrying color indices, 1,2,3,…,Nc. • Leads to color ordering of the external gluons. • Cross section, summed over colors of all external gluons = S |color-ordered amplitudes|2 • Can still use this picture at Nc=3. • Color-ordered amplitudes are still the building blocks. • Corrections to the color-summed cross section, can be handled 2 exactly, but are suppressed by 1/ Nc Beyond Feynman Diagrams Lecture 2 April 25, 2013 5 Trace-based (dual) color decomposition For n-gluon tree amplitudes, the color decomposition is momenta helicities color color-ordered subamplitude only depends on momenta.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximally Helicity Violating Amplitudes
    Maximally Helicity Violating amplitudes Andrew Lifson ID:22635416 Supervised by Assoc. Prof. Peter Skands School of Physics & Astronomy A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Bachelor of Science Advanced with Honours November 13, 2015 Abstract An important aspect in making quantum chromodynamics (QCD) predictions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the speed of the Monte Carlo (MC) event generators which are used to calculate them. MC event generators simulate a pure QCD collision at the LHC by first using fixed-order perturbation theory to calculate the hard (i.e. energetic) 2 ! n scatter, and then adding radiative corrections to this with a parton shower approximation. The 2 ! n scatter is traditionally calculated by summing Feynman diagrams, however the number of Feynman diagrams has a stronger than factorial growth with the number of final-state particles, hence this method quickly becomes infeasible. We can simplify this calculation by considering helicity amplitudes, in which each particle has its spin either aligned or anti-aligned with its direction of motion i.e. each particle has a specific helicity. In particular, it is well-known that the helicity amplitude for the maximally helicity violating (MHV) configuration is remarkably simple to calculate. In this thesis we describe the physics of the MHV amplitude, how we could use it within a MC event generator, and describe a program we wrote called VinciaMHV which calculates the MHV amplitude for the process qg ! q + ng for n = 1; 2; 3; 4. We tested the speed of VinciaMHV against MadGraph4 and found that VinciaMHV calculates the MHV amplitude significantly faster, especially for high particle multiplicities.
    [Show full text]
  • MHV Amplitudes in N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills Theory and Quantum Geometry of the Momentum Space
    Outline Introduction and tree MHV amplitudes BDS conjecture and amplitude - Wilson loop correspondence c=1 string example and fermionic representation of amplitudes Quantization of the moduli space On the fermionic representation of the loop MHV amplitudes Towards the stringy interpretation of the loop MHV amplitudes. MHV amplitudes in N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills theory and quantum geometry of the momentum space Alexander Gorsky ITEP GGI, Florence - 2008 (to appear) Alexander Gorsky MHV amplitudes in N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills theory and quantum geometry of the momentum space Outline Introduction and tree MHV amplitudes BDS conjecture and amplitude - Wilson loop correspondence c=1 string example and fermionic representation of amplitudes Quantization of the moduli space On the fermionic representation of the loop MHV amplitudes Towards the stringy interpretation of the loop MHV amplitudes. Introduction and tree MHV amplitudes BDS conjecture and amplitude - Wilson loop correspondence c=1 string example and fermionic representation of amplitudes Quantization of the moduli space On the fermionic representation of the loop MHV amplitudes Towards the stringy interpretation of the loop MHV amplitudes. Alexander Gorsky MHV amplitudes in N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills theory and quantum geometry of the momentum space Outline Introduction and tree MHV amplitudes BDS conjecture and amplitude - Wilson loop correspondence c=1 string example and fermionic representation of amplitudes Quantization of the moduli space On the fermionic representation of the loop MHV amplitudes
    [Show full text]
  • Explorations of Non-Supersymmetric Black Holes in Supergravity
    Explorations of Non-Supersymmetric Black Holes in Supergravity by Anthony M. Charles A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Physics) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Finn Larsen, Chair Associate Professor Lydia Bieri Professor Henriette Elvang Professor James Liu Associate Professor Jeff McMahon Anthony M. Charles [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1851-458X c Anthony M. Charles 2018 Dedication To my wife, my love, and my everything, Emily. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Finn Larsen, for his incredibly thoughtful guidance and collaboration throughout the course of my graduate career. I am also grateful to the wonder- ful faculty at the University of Michigan. In particular, I would like to thank Ratindranath Akhoury, Henriette Elvang, and Jim Liu for their unending support and advice over the last five years. I owe a lot to the incredibly talented students and postdocs in the high energy theory group at the University of Michigan. Special thanks goes to Sebastian Ellis, John Golden, Gino Knodel, Pedro Lisbao, Daniel Mayerson, Tim Olson, and Vimal Rathee for being some of the most brilliant and engaging people I've ever known. I would be remiss if I didn't thank all of my wonderful friends for making my time in Michigan an absolute joy. In particular, I would like to thank Alec, Ansel, Emily Y., Glenn, Hannah, Jessie, Joe, John, Meryl, Midhat, Natasha, and Peter. You are the best friends I've ever had, and I wouldn't be where I am today without you.
    [Show full text]
  • Loop Amplitudes from MHV Diagrams - Part 1
    Loop Amplitudes from MHV Diagrams - part 1 - Gabriele Travaglini Queen Mary, University of London Brandhuber, Spence, GT hep-th/0407214, hep-th/0510253 Bedford, Brandhuber, Spence, GT hep-th/0410280, hep-th/0412108 Brandhuber, McNamara, Spence, GT in progress 2 HP Workshop, Zürich, September 2006 Outline • Motivations and basic formalism • MHV diagrams (Cachazo, Svrcek,ˇ Witten) - Loop MHV diagrams (Brandhuber, Spence, GT) - Applications: One-loop MHV amplitudes in N=4, N=1 & non-supersymmetric Yang-Mills • Proof at one-loop: Andreas’s talk on Friday Motivations • Simplicity of scattering amplitudes unexplained by textbook Feynman diagrams - Parke-Taylor formula for Maximally Helicity Violating amplitude of gluons (helicities are a permutation of −−++ ....+) • New methods account for this simplicity, and allow for much more efficient calculations • LHC is coming ! Towards simplicity • Colour decomposition (Berends, Giele; Mangano, Parke, Xu; Mangano; Bern, Kosower) • Spinor helicity formalism (Berends, Kleiss, De Causmaecker, Gastmans, Wu; De Causmaecker, Gastmans, Troost, Wu; Kleiss, Stirling; Xu, Zhang, Chang; Gunion, Kunszt) Colour decomposition • Main idea: disentangle colour • At tree level, Yang-Mills interactions are planar tree a a A ( p ,ε ) = Tr(T σ1 T σn) A(σ(p ,ε ),...,σ(p ,ε )) { i i} ∑ ··· 1 1 n n σ Colour-ordered partial amplitude - Include only diagrams with fixed cyclic ordering of gluons - Analytic structure is simpler • At loop level: multi-trace contributions - subleading in 1/N Spinor helicity formalism • Consider a null vector p µ µ µ = ( ,! ) • Define p a a ˙ = p µ σ a a ˙ where σ 1 σ • If p 2 = 0 then det p = 0 ˜ ˜ Hence p aa˙ = λaλa˙ · λ (λ) positive (negative) helicity • spinors a b a˙ b˙ Inner products 12 : = ε ab λ λ , [12] := ε ˙λ˜ λ˜ • ! " 1 2 a˙b 1 2 Parke-Taylor formula 4 + + i j A (1 ...i− ..
    [Show full text]
  • Unitarity Methods for Scattering Amplitudes in Perturbative Gauge Theories
    Unitarity Methods for Scattering Amplitudes in Perturbative Gauge Theories by MASSIMILIANO VINCON A report presented for the examination for the transfer of status to the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London Thesis Supervisor DR ANDREAS BRANDHUBER Centre for Research in String Theory Department of Physics Queen Mary University of London Mile End Road London E1 4NS United Kingdom The strong do what they want and the weak suffer as they must.1 1Thucydides. Declaration I hereby declare that the material presented in this thesis is a representation of my own personal work unless otherwise stated and is a result of collaborations with Andreas Brandhuber and Gabriele Travaglini. Massimiliano Vincon Abstract In this thesis, we discuss novel techniques used to compute perturbative scattering am- plitudes in gauge theories. In particular, we focus on the use of complex momenta and generalised unitarity as efficient and elegant tools, as opposed to standard textbook Feynman rules, to compute one-loop amplitudes in gauge theories. We consider scatter- ing amplitudes in non-supersymmetric and supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories (SYM). After introducing some of the required mathematical machinery, we give concrete exam- ples as to how generalised unitarity works in practice and we correctly reproduce the n- gluon one-loop MHV amplitude in non-supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory with a scalar running in the loop, thus confirming an earlier result obtained using MHV diagrams: no independent check of this result had been carried out yet. Non-supersymmetric scat- tering amplitudes are the most difficult to compute and are of great importance as they are part of background processes at the LHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    Durham E-Theses Hadronic productions of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at next-to-leading order WILLIAMS, CIARAN How to cite: WILLIAMS, CIARAN (2010) Hadronic productions of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at next-to-leading order , Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/414/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at next-to-leading order Ciaran Williams A Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Department of Physics University of Durham England August 2010 Dedicated to My Parents Hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at next-to-leading order Ciaran Williams Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2010 Abstract We present the calculation of hadronic production of a Higgs boson in association with two jets at next-to-leading order in perturbation theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Field Theories: Mhv Vertices, Twistor Space, Recursion Relations and Chiral Rings
    STUDIES IN FIELD THEORIES: MHV VERTICES, TWISTOR SPACE, RECURSION RELATIONS AND CHIRAL RINGS Peter Svr·cek Advisor: Edward Witten A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS April 2005 Copyright °c 2005 by Peter Svr·cek All rights reserved. ii Abstract In this thesis we study di®erent aspects of four dimensional ¯eld theories. In the ¯rst chapter we give introduction and overview of the thesis. In the second chapter we review the connection between perturbative Yang-Mills and twistor string the- ory. Inspired by this, we propose a new way of constructing Yang-Mills scattering amplitudes from Feynman graphs in which the vertices are o®-shell continuations of the tree level MHV amplitudes. The MHV diagrams lead to simple formulas for tree-level amplitudes. We then give a heuristic derivation of the diagrams from twistor string theory. In the third chapter, we explore the twistor structure of scattering amplitudes in theories for which a twistor string theory analogous to the one for N = 4 gauge theory has not yet been proposed. We study the di®erential equations of one-loop amplitudes of gluons in gauge theories with reduced supersymmetry and of tree level and one-loop amplitudes of gravitons in general relativity and supergravity. We ¯nd that the scattering amplitudes localize in twistor space on algebraic curves that are surprisingly similar to the N = 4 Yang-Mills case. In the next chapter we propose tree-level recursion relations for scattering am- plitudes of gravitons.
    [Show full text]
  • Unitarity and On-Shell Recursion Methods for Scattering Amplitudes
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN PhD thesis Kasper Risager Larsen Unitarity and On-Shell Recursion Methods for Scattering Amplitudes Academic advisor: Poul Henrik Damgaard Submitted: 23/11/07 Unitarity and On-Shell Recursion Methods for Scattering Amplitudes by Kasper Risager Submitted for the degree of Ph.D. in Physics from the Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen. November 2007 Abstract This thesis describes some of the recent (and some less recent) developments in calculational techniques for scattering amplitudes in quantum field theory. The focus is on on-shell recursion relations in complex momenta and on the use of unitarity methods for loop calculations. In particular, on-shell recursion is related to the MHV rules for computing tree-level gauge amplitudes and used to extend the MHV rules to graviton scattering. Combinations of unitarity cut techniques and recursion is used to argue for the “No-Triangle Hypothesis” in N = 8 supergravity which is related to its UV behaviour. Finally, combinations of unitarity and recursion is used to demonstrate the full calculation of a one- loop amplitude involving a Higgs particle and four gluons in the limit of large top mass. Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1ScatteringAmplitudesinTheoryandExperiment.......... 5 1.1.1 BackgroundProcessesattheLHC.............. 6 1.1.2 ApproachingQuantumGravity?............... 7 1.2ScatteringAmplitudesintheComplexPlane............ 7 1.2.1 The Unitary and Analytic S-Matrix............. 8 1.2.2 GeneralizingfromLoopstoTrees............... 10 1.2.3 FullAmplitudesfromTrees.................. 11 1.3AboutThisThesis........................... 12 1.3.1 Omissions............................ 12 1.3.2 Outline............................. 12 1.4ConclusionandOutlook........................ 13 1.4.1 ACompetitorintheCalculationRace............ 13 1.4.2 UnderstandingQuantumFieldTheories........... 14 2 Preliminaries 15 2.1ColourOrdering...........................
    [Show full text]
  • A Simpler Prescription for MHV Graviton Tree Amplitudes in Superstring Theory
    A simpler prescription for MHV graviton tree amplitudes in superstring theory Tiago Ursulino [email protected] Instituto de F´ısica Te´orica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (IFT-Unesp) S~aoPaulo, SP, Brazil September 2013 Abstract We extend the Berkovits-Maldacena prescription for MHV amplitudes of the open superstring to the closed superstring, showing that in the α0 = 0 limit it reduces to the result of supergravity found recently by Hodges. We also verify that this prescription calculates the correct superstring tree level MHV amplitude for 4 gravitons including α0 corrections. arXiv:1308.6456v2 [hep-th] 5 Nov 2013 Keywords: Scattering amplitudes, superstrings and heterotic strings, extended su- persymmetry Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 MHV amplitudes in super-Yang-Mills and supergravity 3 2.1 Helicity spinors . 3 2.2 Supersymmetric extensions of YM and gravity . 6 2.3 MHV amplitudes for gluons . 8 2.4 MHV amplitudes for gravitons . 9 2.4.1 An overview of the formulas so far; symmetry and efficiency . 9 3 MHV amplitudes in superstring theory 14 3.1 Berkovits-Maldacena prescription . 14 3.2 The analogous prescription for closed strings . 16 3.2.1 Scattering with n=4 gravitons . 17 3.2.2 The α0=0 limit, for arbitrary n . 19 4 Conclusions 26 A Comparing our MHV scattering amplitude for n=4 gravitons with usual superstring theory 27 1 Introduction Berkovits and Maldacena [1] have proposed 5 years ago a prescription to calculate MHV amplitudes for gluons at tree level inside the context of string theory, in a 4 dimensional spacetime. Their
    [Show full text]
  • R4 Counterterm and E7(7) Symmetry in Maximal Supergravity
    SLAC–PUB–13848 AEI-2009-110 ITP-UH-18/09 arXiv:0911.5704 4 counterterm and E symmetry in maximal supergravity R 7(7) Johannes Br¨odela,b and Lance J. Dixonc a Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Gravitationsphysik Albert-Einstein-Institut, Golm, Germany b Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik Leibniz Universit¨at Hannover, Germany c SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Stanford University Stanford, CA 94309, USA Abstract The coefficient of a potential 4 counterterm in = 8 supergravity has been shown previously R N to vanish in an explicit three-loop calculation. The 4 term respects = 8 supersymmetry; R N hence this result poses the question of whether another symmetry could be responsible for the cancellation of the three-loop divergence. In this article we investigate possible restrictions from the coset symmetry E7(7)/SU(8), exploring the limits as a single scalar becomes soft, as well as a double-soft scalar limit relation derived recently by Arkani-Hamed et al. We implement these relations for the matrix elements of the 4 term that occurs in the low-energy expansion of closed- R string tree-level amplitudes. We find that the matrix elements of 4 that we investigated all obey R the double-soft scalar limit relation, including certain non-maximally-helicity-violating six-point amplitudes. However, the single-soft limit does not vanish for this latter set of amplitudes, which suggests that the E symmetry is broken by the 4 term. 7(7) R Work supported in part by US Department of Energy contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Coset structure, hidden symmetry and double-soft limit 6 3 String theory corrections to field theory amplitudes 8 3.1 Tree-level amplitudes in = 4 SYM and =8Supergravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Renormalization Theorems Without Supersymmetry
    CALT-2015-024 Non-renormalization Theorems without Supersymmetry Clifford Cheung and Chia-Hsien Shen Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125∗ (Dated: May 11, 2015) We derive a new class of one-loop non-renormalization theorems that strongly constrain the running of higher dimension operators in a general four-dimensional quantum field theory. Our logic follows from unitarity: cuts of one-loop amplitudes are products of tree amplitudes, so if the latter vanish then so too will the associated divergences. Finiteness is then ensured by simple selection rules that zero out tree amplitudes for certain helicity configurations. For each operator we define holomorphic and anti-holomorphic weights, (w, w) = (n − h, n + h), where n and h are the number and sum over helicities of the particles created by that operator. We argue that an operator Oi can only be renormalized by an operator Oj if wi ≥ wj and wi ≥ wj , absent non-holomorphic Yukawa couplings. These results explain and generalize the surprising cancellations discovered in the renormalization of dimension six operators in the standard model. Since our claims rely on unitarity and helicity rather than an explicit symmetry, they apply quite generally. INTRODUCTION where n(A) and h(A) are the number and sum over helic- ities of the external states. Since A is physical, its weight Technical naturalness dictates that all operators not is field reparameterization and gauge independent. The forbidden by symmetry are compulsory—and thus gen- weights of an operator O are then invariantly defined by erated by renormalization. Softened ultraviolet diver- minimizing over all amplitudes involving that operator: gences are in turn a telltale sign of underlying symmetry.
    [Show full text]