DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Bible Journey, Fall 2020 Week 1: the Synoptic Gospels (Red Font

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Bible Journey, Fall 2020 Week 1: the Synoptic Gospels (Red Font Bible Journey, Fall 2020 Week 1: The Synoptic Gospels (Red font represents notes added to outline) Introduction and Overview for Fall 2020 Using Zoom: stay muted if background noise, raise hands to speak, use chat, contact me to troubleshoot, give each other lots of grace Picking up Deuteronomy (didn’t finish spring or winter; do Deut in Jan; others in summer?) Check out the website for notes and resources: https://www.smlcfamily.org/BJ-Synoptics-Acts Schedule (next class Oct 4, Mark); both Sunday and Monday, every other week, but break at Thanksgiving Reading the Gospels Together and Apart Two ways to read: as part of that Gospel, and in comparison with the other Gospels Each Gospel is its own literary work, with its own emphasis and themes, and so each needs to be read from front to back on its own However, all four Gospels tell the story of Jesus, and all four have overlapping stories, and they also have differences, so it would be impossible not to compare them in some way Our focus in the coming classes will be each Gospel independently, so here we will focus on the comparison of them (I’m not talking about Acts today; we’ll look at an overview of Acts during the first week on that) The Synoptic Gospels Matthew, Mark, and Luke are referred to as the “Synoptic Gospels.” synopsis = “seeing together” There are many parallels among these three Gospels, so it is common to lay out these three in parallel columns and compare them. Often John is included in this type of synopsis too, but John has far less overlap. This title is acknowledging that there is a lot of similarity among these three Gospels and looks especially at the relationship among the three. So, even though there are four Gospels, they really present only two traditions, or two unique/distinct perspectives: John and the Synoptics. Inspiration, Composition, and Editing of the Gospels (For more on inspiration and composition, see What Is the Bible) The inspiration of Scripture is not referring to a single moment (such as an angel whispering the text into the ear of the writer) but refers to the inspiration of entire process, from researching sources through the final editing, and even the copying and translation of the text. The Word of God is the message communicated through the individual words of the text. When we read the Gospels especially, we should be focusing on the overall message about the life and ministry of Jesus, not the exact wording, or even exact historical timeline. Luke’s Prologue (Luke 1:1-4) Since many have undertaken to set down an orderly account of the events that have been fulfilled among us, 2 just as they were handed on to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and 1 servants of the word, 3 I too decided, after investigating everything carefully from the very first, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4 so that you may know the truth concerning the things about which you have been instructed. What is Luke telling us about his process and his sources? From “What Is the Bible”: How the Bible Was Written & Edited into Canonical Form *Oral tradition and written sources (see Luke 1:1-4): various books have preexisting material in them: stories and oral traditions, sayings of Jesus, psalms and hymns, annals of kings *Composition of the text (oral and written): writing materials were expensive, and culture depended more on oral than written information; writers took notes on wax tablets and sometimes composed the text orally or by memory before writing it down *Dictation or writing of the text (see Jer. 36:1-6, 21-23, 32; Rom. 16:22; Gal. 6:11): it was a normal practice to compose a text by dictating it to a scribe *Editing of the text: some biblical texts went through a process of editing (e.g., beginning and end of Job; Psalms collected into five books; John 21 may have been added on after the fact); the authoritative version of a book is the final version, not a hypothetical early edition The Synoptic Problem We know that Matthew, Mark, and Luke have a lot of overlap, including verbal overlap. It is clear that there is a literary relationship among the three; the question is, what is that relationship? What order were they written in? Had they read each other’s Gospels? Did they use each other Gospels as a source for their own? If so, why did they write a new Gospel when others existed? How did they use or modify each other’s text? What other sources did they use? Why is it a “problem”? Think of problem as in a math problem, or a puzzle to solve. There are many theories, and we will look at a couple of dominant theories, but there are many, many more and no single consensus. (For the following topics, see https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/synoptic-gospels and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synoptic_Gospels, as well as other links under “Resources,” below.) Markan Priority “Markan Priority” is the theory that Mark’s Gospel was written first among the Synoptics (and was used as a source for Matthew and Luke). Two-Source Hypothesis The “two sources” are Mark and Q (see below). This theory argues that Matthew and Luke both, independently, relied on Mark and Q as written sources for their own Gospels. Four-Source Hypothesis Building on the two-source hypothesis, this theory argues that in addition to the two sources Mark and Q, Matthew and Luke had access to two additional sources: M (representing material unique to Matthew’s Gospel) and L (representing material unique to Luke’s Gospel). Thus, in total there were 2 four sources available for composition of the Gospels: Mark, Q, M, L. (However, Matthew and Luke each used only three of these sources.) Q Quelle (German) = “source” Scholars use the abbreviation Q to refer to a written source in Greek that was used by both Matthew and Luke. The content of Q therefore consists of material that Matthew and Luke have in common that is not present in the other Gospels. Is there such a document as Q? Maybe. There is no manuscript evidence of Q, but we do have manuscripts of sayings collections, which may be a similar genre. Some scholars are convinced that Q was a real document, and some have even written commentaries on Q and its community. Other scholars think it is an unnecessary hypothesis; such scholars typically explain the overlap between Matthew and Luke by arguing that one of these was dependent on the other (most commonly, that Luke used Matthew as a source). The best approach is to accept Q as a hypothesis and as a way of describing the common material between Matthew and Luke, whether it was an actual document or simply is shorthand for this grouping of common material. The Bottom Line Bottom line: Why does it matter whether we know any of this? If you are reading Bible notes or a commentary, it helps to know what Q is, and possibly also M and L. Most modern commentaries or study Bibles will assume that Mark was written first and that Matthew and Luke were dependent on Mark. If we want to understand the differences between the Gospels and the editorial choices they made to tell their story, it is helpful (or even necessary) to know which Gospel came first (for example, did Matthew expand on Mark, or did Mark abbreviate Matthew?). In our life application, comparing the different Gospels helps us to recognize which aspects of the Jesus tradition are more established (John the Baptist and baptism of Jesus, words of Jesus, the fact that Jesus healed and did miracles, the crucifixion and resurrection, etc.) and which aspects of each Gospel are shaped to convey the message of that Gospel. 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Synoptic Gospels, Revised and Expanded an Introduction 2Nd Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS, REVISED AND EXPANDED AN INTRODUCTION 2ND EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Keith F Nickle | 9780664223496 | | | | | The Synoptic Gospels, Revised and Expanded An Introduction 2nd edition PDF Book See details for additional description. About this product. Jesus Under Fire. In a clear and concise manner, Nickles explores the major issues of faith that influenced the writers of the Gospels. Ask a Question What would you like to know about this product? The Story of Romans. Be the first to write a review About this product. Privacy Policy Terms of Use. Write a Review. Bible Sale of the Season. Sign in or create an account. Enter email address. Jesus and the First Three Gospels. By: Robert H. The Synoptic Gospels. You can unsubscribe at any time. An Introduction to The Gospels. Jesus, Justice and the Reign of God. Be the first to write a review. Wishlist Wishlist. Toggle navigation. Judaism When Christianity Began. Studying the Synoptic Gospels, Second Edition. Keith Nickle provides a revised and updated edition of a well-respected resource that fills the gap between cursory treatments of the Synoptic Gospels by New Testament introductions and exhaustive treatments in commentaries. We believe this work is culturally important, and. The Targum Onquelos to the Torah: Genesis. Barry Rubin. Will be clean, not soiled or stained. Literary Forms in the New Testament. The Synoptic Gospels, Revised and Expanded An Introduction 2nd edition Writer Paperback Books Revised Edition. The Synoptic Gospels is helpful for classroom or personal use. Sign in or create an account. Best Selling in Nonfiction See all. No ratings or reviews yet No ratings or reviews yet.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORY, JESUS, and the SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Resources for Biblical Study
    MEMORY, JESUS, AND THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Resources for Biblical Study Tom Th atcher, New Testament Editor Number 59 MEMORY, JESUS, AND THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS MEMORY, JESUS, AND THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS By Robert K. McIver Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta MEMORY, JESUS, AND THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Copyright © 2011 by the Society of Biblical Literature All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Offi ce, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McIver, Robert K. (Robert Kerry), 1953– Memory, Jesus, and the Synoptic Gospels / by Robert K. McIver. p. cm. — (Society of Biblical Literature resources for biblical study ; no. 59) Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and indexes. ISBN 978-1-58983-560-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-1-58983-561-0 (electronic format) 1. Bible. N.T. Gospels—Criticism, interpretation, etc. 2. Memory—Religious aspects— Christianity. 3. Jesus Christ—Historicity. I. Title. BS2555.52.M35 2011 232.9'08—dc22 2011014983 Printed on acid-free, recycled paper conforming to ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R1997) and ISO 9706:1994 standards for paper permanence. Contents List of Tables
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Experience What Are the Synoptic Gospels? (25 Minutes)
    Learning Experience What Are the Synoptic Gospels? (25 minutes) Activity Plan 1. You will want to have read the Catechist Background information prior to beginning this part of the lesson. 2. Introduce the learning experience with these, or similar, words: Have you ever noticed that some passages, sayings of Jesus, even stories in one gospel are nearly identical to that found in one or more of the other gospels? Let me show you what I mean. Would someone please read aloud Matthew 3:13-17? . Now, would someone please read aloud Mark 1:9-11? . And lastly, would someone please read aloud Luke 3:21-22? It’s uncanny how similar are these passages. You would think the authors were copying from the same source! And if that is what you are thinking then, YOU ARE RIGHT! The Synoptic Gospels are the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. They are called synoptic (which means “seen together”) (like synonym) because they can be compared column by column with each other. The three Synoptic Gospels have many parables and accounts in common, as well as a general consensus on the order of events, suggesting a common source for all three. As we will see, the writers of these gospels were indeed using some of the same sources. You may be asking why each Gospel writer would retell story based on the same source of information. Studying each of the Synoptic writers in more detail will reveal that each wrote to a different audience and for different reasons. For example, the writer of the Gospel of Luke (who may have been a physician) wrote to, and on behalf of the widow, the poor, orphaned and marginalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Christ in the Synoptic Gospels
    Christ in the Synoptic Gospels REGULAR BAPTIST PRESS 1300 North Meacham Road Schaumburg, Illinois 60173-4806 Executive Director: David M. Gower Director of Educational Resources: Valerie A. Wilson Assistant Editors: Jonita Barram; Melissa Meyer Art Director: Steve Kerr Cover Design: Jim Johnson Production: Deb Wright ONE SOLITARY LIFE: CHRIST IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Adult Bible Study Leader’s Guide Vol. 53 • No. 1 © 2004 • Regular Baptist Press 1-800-727-4440 • www.regularbaptistpress.org RBP1626 • ISBN: 1-59402-143-0 Contents How to Use Life Design . 5 Preface . 6 Introduction . 7 Comparative Chart of the Gospels . 10 LESSON 1 Begotten Alone: Incarnation . 11 LESSON 2 He Fought Alone: Temptation . 19 LESSON 3 He Cared Alone: Compassion . 26 LESSON 4 He Sought Them Alone: Evangelization. 31 LESSON 5 He Taught Alone: Education . 37 LESSON 6 He Was Glorified Alone: Transfiguration . 42 LESSON 7 He Was Rejected Alone: Opposition . 48 LESSON 8 He Offered Alone: Presentation . 54 LESSON 9 He Prayed Alone: Intercession . 61 LESSON 10 He Stood Alone: Accusation. 67 LESSON 11 He Died Alone: Crucifixion . 74 LESSON 12 He Arose Alone: Resurrection . 80 LESSON 13 One Solitary Life: A Review . 88 Answers to Bible Study Questions . 95 How to Use Life Design LIFE DESIGN: Bible rial in the Bible study than you can cover in one class Study Designed for the session. Ask God to help you as you tailor the lesson Life You Live. These for your learners. Bible study materials are The Study Book designed to engage adult This leader’s guide is designed to accompany the learners in inductive Bible study book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Synoptic Gospels by Felix Just, S.J., Ph.D
    The Synoptic Gospels by Felix Just, S.J., Ph.D. The "Synoptic Gospels"- The Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, and Luke are so similar to each other that, in a sense, they view Jesus "with the same eye" (syn-optic), in contrast to the very different picture of Jesus presented in the Fourth Gospel (John). Yet there are also many significant differences among the three Synoptic Gospels. The "Synoptic Problem" - The similarities between Matthew, Mark, and Luke are so numerous and so close, not just in the order of the material presented but also in the exact wording of long stretches of text, that it is not sufficient to explain these similarities on the basis of common oral tradition alone. Rather, some type of literary dependence must be assumed as well. That is, someone copied from someone else's previously written text; several of the evangelists must have used one or more of the earlier Gospels as sources for their own compositions. The situation is complicated because some of the material is common to all three Synoptics, while other material is found in only two out of these three Gospels.. Moreover, the common material is not always presented in the same order in the various Gospels. So, the question remains, who wrote first, and who copied from whom? The Four-Source Theory (the solution accepted by most scholars today) Mark = the oldest written Gospel, which provided the narrative framework for both Matt and Luke Q = "Quelle" = a hypothetical written "Source" of some sayings / teachings of Jesus (now lost?). By definition Q consists of materials found in Matthew and Luke and not in Mark M = various other materials (mostly oral, some maybe written) found only in Matthew L = various other materials (mostly oral, others probably written) found only in Luke Note: the arrows indicate direction of influence; older materials are above, later Gospels below Markan Priority - For most of Christian history, people thought that Matthew was the first and oldest Gospel, and that Mark was a later, shorter version of the same basic message.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia Theological Quarterly
    Concordia Theological Quarterly Volume 79:3–4 July/October 2015 Table of Contents The Lutheran Hymnal after Seventy-Five Years: Its Role in the Shaping of Lutheran Service Book Paul J. Grime ..................................................................................... 195 Ascending to God: The Cosmology of Worship in the Old Testament Jeffrey H. Pulse ................................................................................. 221 Matthew as the Foundation for the New Testament Canon David P. Scaer ................................................................................... 233 Luke’s Canonical Criterion Arthur A. Just Jr. ............................................................................... 245 The Role of the Book of Acts in the Recognition of the New Testament Canon Peter J. Scaer ...................................................................................... 261 The Relevance of the Homologoumena and Antilegomena Distinction for the New Testament Canon Today: Revelation as a Test Case Charles A. Gieschen ......................................................................... 279 Taking War Captive: A Recommendation of Daniel Bell’s Just War as Christian Discipleship Joel P. Meyer ...................................................................................... 301 Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage: The Triumph of Culture? Gifford A. Grobien ............................................................................ 315 Pastoral Care and Sex Harold L. Senkbeil .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel of Matthew 101
    GOSPEL OF MATTHEW 101 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Most books of the Bible don’t come with standard bylines, and the Gospel of Matthew is no exception. While early Christian tradition attributes authorship of this gospel to Matthew, one of Jesus’ disciples, many modern scholars dispute the notion. Instead, scholars contend the author of Matthew was likely a Jewish man writing around 80 CE who drew upon the Gospel of Mark (including 600 of Mark’s 661 verses) but also expanded the narrative. Even if the Apostle Matthew is not the writer of the gospel, his story gives us insight into the life and ministry of Jesus. Matthew, also known as Levi, is a tax collector, a role viewed with disdain. By selecting Matthew as a disciple, Jesus shows again by example that all people are beloved children of God, that all are worthy of love, forgiveness, and redemption. While Matthew appears in all four gospels and in the Book of Acts, we know very little about the rest of his life or how he died, only that he was a faithful companion and disciple of Jesus. ABOUT THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW The Gospel of Matthew is one of the three synoptic gospels, along with Mark and Luke. These three gospels share many of the same stories and sometimes the same words. Despite some similarities, Matthew expands on key teachings of Jesus and features a number of parables and stories not found in the other gospels. For instance, it’s only in Matthew that we hear about the Magi making their trek across the desert with gifts for baby Jesus.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 79:3–4 July/October 2015
    Concordia Theological Quarterly Volume 79:3–4 July/October 2015 Table of Contents The Lutheran Hymnal after Seventy-Five Years: Its Role in the Shaping of Lutheran Service Book Paul J. Grime ..................................................................................... 195 Ascending to God: The Cosmology of Worship in the Old Testament Jeffrey H. Pulse ................................................................................. 221 Matthew as the Foundation for the New Testament Canon David P. Scaer ................................................................................... 233 Luke’s Canonical Criterion Arthur A. Just Jr. ............................................................................... 245 The Role of the Book of Acts in the Recognition of the New Testament Canon Peter J. Scaer ...................................................................................... 261 The Relevance of the Homologoumena and Antilegomena Distinction for the New Testament Canon Today: Revelation as a Test Case Charles A. Gieschen ......................................................................... 279 Taking War Captive: A Recommendation of Daniel Bell’s Just War as Christian Discipleship Joel P. Meyer ...................................................................................... 301 Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage: The Triumph of Culture? Gifford A. Grobien ............................................................................ 315 Pastoral Care and Sex Harold L. Senkbeil .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Synoptic Gospels Moving Literature Or Apostolic Texts?
    The Synoptic Gospels Moving Literature or Apostolic Texts? TORSTEN LÖFSTEDT Torsten Löfstedt is associate professor of religious studies at Linnæus University. [email protected] Introduction Ever since the Diet of Worms in 1521, Evangelical Protestants have claimed that Scripture is the foundation of their faith; church traditions and papal decrees are fallible, but Scripture is trustworthy 1. The Vulgate, the Latin translation of Martin Luther’s (1483–1546) day, was not reliable, however; Luther sought to base his theology on Erasmus of Rotterdam’s (1466–1536) reconstruction of the original Greek text instead .2 But Erasmus’ reconstruction was not perfect either . Since Erasmus’s day, ever more New Testament manuscripts have been disco- vered, and the reconstruction has to be continually revised; the Nestle-Aland text is currently in its twenty-eighth revised edition . What text is it that serves as firm foundation for Protestants? The answer given by fundamentalists of the Princeton school was the original “autographs ”. 3 Individual copies of the texts evidently contain errors, but the original autographs are infallible . These manuscripts are of course not extant, but fundamentalists were persuaded that reconstructions of the original text were so accurate that their absence did not 1 . The term “Evangelical” has been used in various ways since the Reformation . As is discus- sed below, I use it in reference to Protestants that seek to grant Scripture the highest authority in matters of faith . 2 . See Mark D . Thompson, A Sure Ground on Which to Stand: The Relation of Authority and Interpretive Method in Luther’s Approach to Scripture, Milton Keynes 2004, 143–144 and references there .
    [Show full text]
  • THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Class 1 the CRITICAL STUDY of the SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Outline
    Graduate Program in Pastoral Ministries THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Class 1 THE CRITICAL STUDY OF THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Outline § Orientation to the Course ú Syllabus, website, workbook, readings, library § The Bible ú What it is and where it comes from ú How scholars build the Bible ú The New Testament • How Our Texts Circulated • The Fluidity of the Canon • A Timeline of the Christian Gospels § Principles of Catholic Biblical Interpretation § The Lives of Mark The Synoptic Gospels ORIENTATION TO THE COURSE Syllabus Website Synoptic Workbook Books Camino Library Workbook, pp. 34-35 CATHOLIC BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION Impact of the Protestant Reformation (1517–1648) § Reformers in Europe protested the teachings, rituals and structures of the Catholic Church § They sought to base all three on scripture alone; they considered subsequent developments aberrations § Since everyone needed access to scripture, and since the Catholic Church and its Latin translation were suspect, Protestants ² translated the Bible into the vernacular(s) ² encouraged everyone to read it, not just the clergy ² resulting in diverging interpretations of scripture The Catholic Response (1517–1948) § Some reforms of teachings, rituals and structures were undertaken, but scripture reforms were resisted until the 20th century § Catholics asserted that scripture was not the only locus of revelation, but that God continued to guide the Church through its tradition § With regard to the Bible, the Catholic Church ² Retained the Bible in Latin; the first translations into the vernacular
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence and Use of Daniel in the Synoptic Gospels
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2011 The Influence and Use of Daniel in the Synoptic Gospels Reimar Vetne Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Vetne, Reimar, "The Influence and Use of Daniel in the Synoptic Gospels" (2011). Dissertations. 160. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/160 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. ABSTRACT THE INFLUENCE AND USE OF DANIEL IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS by Reimar Vetne Adviser: Jon Paulien ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE INFLUENCE AND USE OF DANIEL IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS Name of researcher: Reimar Vetne Name and degree of faculty adviser: Jon Paulien, Ph.D. Date completed: July 2011 Scholars have always been aware of influence from the book of Daniel in the Synoptic Gospels. Various allusions to Daniel have been discussed in numerous articles, monographs and commentaries. Now we have for the first time a comprehensive look at all the possible allusions to Daniel in one study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourfold Gospel in the Writings of Ephrem the Syrian
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 18.1, 9-51 © 2015 by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press THE FOURFOLD GOSPEL IN THE WRITINGS OF EPHREM THE SYRIAN MATTHEW R. CRAWFORD DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY AND RELIGION DURHAM UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT: Ephrem of Nisibis is unique among patristic authors for having authored a commentary on Tatian’s gospel commonly known as the “Diatessaron.” In this article I examine Ephrem’s corpus to determine what evidence exists for his knowledge and use of gospel versions beyond that of Tatian, most especially the fourfold, or separated gospel. I point out that Ephrem, in keeping with Greek and Latin authors, occasionally used poetic imagery for the fourfold gospel, and, moreover, that he knew at least the Synoptic genealogies and the Johannine prologue as distinct texts. It is undeniable, therefore, that he knew of and to some degree used the separated, fourfold gospel, even if this remained slight in comparison with his reliance upon Tatian’s version. Furthermore, on six occasions Ephrem refers to an unspecified “Greek” gospel version. Previous scholarship has almost universally interpreted these passages as references to a separated gospel in Syriac, but I argue that these are best taken as references to an actual Greek version, and may well be allusions to a Greek edition of Tatian’s work. Ephrem’s usage of multiple gospel versions suggests that at this point in the Syriac tradition, the concept of ‘gospel’ was fluid and more undefined than would be the case in the fifth century when attempts were made to restrict its sense to the fourfold gospel.
    [Show full text]