Download the Opal Card Guide
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Victoria's Level Crossing Removal Project Uses
VICTORIA’S LEVEL CROSSING REMOVAL PROJECT USES INEIGHT TECHNOLOGY TO BETTER MANAGE AND CONTROL PROJECT DOCUMENTS Red-faced and white-knuckled – common symptoms of rush-hour commuters in Melbourne as they waited at one of the many level crossings (or rail crossings as they’re called in the U.S.). Looking to unclog some of the city’s busiest roads, the Victorian state government has taken the bold move of eliminating 75 of these dangerous and congested level crossings, including nine between the suburbs of Caulfield and Dandenong. The Level Crossing Removal Project (LXRP) and Lendlease, a leading international property and infrastructure group that is part of an alliance responsible for level crossing removals, wanted to transform the way they approached the project. Because the project was highly complex with so many stakeholders involved, LXRP needed to develop a cutting-edge technological approach that would help increase efficiency and collaboration. It selected a collaborative document management software solution from InEight, a leading developer of capital project management software. LXRP mandated that Lendlease use the document management solution, InEight® Document, to manage, protect and control project documents throughout the Caulfield to Dandenong (CTD) project. With InEight Document, CTD project teams now have an online document repository for capturing, controlling, versioning and distributing project documents, while tracking the complete history of every project document. This includes project documents, workflows, photos, emails and their attachments. The ability to track the complete history of every project document led to improved communication and collaboration on this monumental project. This resulted in greater efficiency throughout the project. -
High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing
High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing Project #: RES2016-05 Final Report Submitted to Tennessee Department of Transportation Principal Investigator (PI) Deo Chimba, PhD., P.E., PTOE. Tennessee State University Phone: 615-963-5430 Email: [email protected] Co-Principal Investigator (Co-PI) Janey Camp, PhD., P.E., GISP, CFM Vanderbilt University Phone: 615-322-6013 Email: [email protected] July 10, 2018 DISCLAIMER This research was funded through the State Research and Planning (SPR) Program by the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration under RES2016-05: High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the United States Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The State of Tennessee and the United States Government assume no liability of its contents or use thereof. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who are solely responsible for the facts and accuracy of the material presented. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Tennessee Department of Transportation or the United States Department of Transportation. ii Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. RES2016-05 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date: March 2018 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Detection System Testing 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Deo Chimba and Janey Camp TDOT PROJECT # RES2016-05 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering; Tennessee State University 11. -
Transport in the Cumberland Community Research Report June 2020
Transport in the Cumberland Community Research Report June 2020 Document Set ID: 8005199 Version: 9, Version Date: 13/08/2020 Report prepared by the Social Research and Planning Team, Community and Place, Cumberland City Council 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY Cumberland City Council acknowledges the Darug Nation and People as the traditional custodians of the land on which the Cumberland Local Government Area is situated and pays respect to Aboriginal Elders past, present and emerging. We acknowledge the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples as the First Peoples of Australia. Cumberland City Council also acknowledges other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples living and working in the Cumberland Local Government Area. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PARTICIPANTS Cumberland City Council would like to acknowledge and thank everyone who participated in this research. This report would not have been possible without your time and willingness to share your stories and experiences. Document Set ID: 8005199 Version: 9, Version Date: 13/08/2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents findings from research into key transport and mobility challenges for the Cumberland community. This research was conducted between August 2019 and April 2020 and is grounded in empirical data sourced from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and Transport for NSW, amongst other sources, and extensive community engagement. Quality transport options are fundamental to accessing many essential services, education, employment and social and recreational activities. Although three train lines run through the Cumberland LGA, in addition to the T80 high frequency bus route, many Cumberland residents still have difficulties getting around. Major barriers raised by the community relate to reliability, frequency and coverage of services. -
Explaining MBTA Commuter Rail Ridership METHODS RIDERSHIP
TAKING THE TRAIN? Explaining MBTA Commuter Rail Ridership INTRODUCTION RIDERSHIP BY STATION RESULTS The MBTA Commuter Rail provides service from suburbs in the Boston Metro Area to Boston area stations, with terminal Commuter Rail Variables stations at North Station and South Station. While using commuter rail may be faster, particularly at rush hour, than using a Distance to Boston, distance to rapid transit, price of commuter rail, commuter rail time, transit time, and drive time are all personal vehicle or other transit alternatives, people still choose not to use the Commuter Rail, as can be demonstrated by the highly correlated. This makes sense as they all essentially measure distance to Boston in dollars, minutes and miles. high volume of people driving at rush hour. For the commuter rail variables analysis, trains per weekday (standardized beta=.536, p=.000), drive time at 8AM This study seeks to understand the personal vehicle and public transit alternatives to the MBTA Commuter Rail at each stop (standardized beta=.385, p=.000), peak on time performance (standardized beta=-.206, p=.009) and the terminal station to understand what options people have when deciding to use the Commuter Rail over another mode and what characteristics (p=.001) were found to be significant. Interestingly, all variables calculated for the area a half mile from commuter rail sta- tions (population, jobs and median income) were not significant. of the alternatives may inspire people to choose them over Commuter Rail. Understanding what transit and driving alterna- tives are like at each Commuter Rail stop may offer insight into why people are choosing or not choosing Commuter Rail for Transit Variables their trips to Boston, and how to encourage ridership. -
Stanwell Park to Wollongong
Stanwell Park to 2 Wollongong Bus Timetable via Wombarra, Coledale, Austinmer, Thirroul, Corrimal & Fairy Meadow Includes accessible services Effective from 29 January 2013 What’s inside Opal. Your ticket to public transport. Your Bus timetable ........................................................... 1 Opal is the easy way of travelling on public transport in Ticketing .......................................................................... 1 Sydney, the Blue Mountains, Central Coast, Hunter, Illawarra and Southern Highlands. Accessible services ............................................................ 1 An Opal card is a smartcard you keep and reuse. You load How to use this timetable ................................................. 2 value onto the card to pay for your travel on any mode of Other general information ................................................. 2 public transport, including trains, buses, ferries and light rail. Bus contacts ..................................................................... 3 Opal card benefits Timetables • Fares capped daily, weekly and on Sundays* From Stanwell Park towards Wollongong • Discounted travel after eight paid journeys each week Monday to Friday ............................................................. 4 • $2 discount for every transfer between modes (train, bus, ferry, light rail) as part of one journey within 60 minutes.† Saturday .......................................................................... 6 • Off-peak train fare savings of 30% From Wollongong towards -
Opal Refund and Balance Transfer Policy Electronic Ticketing System Version 4.8
Opal Refund and Balance Transfer Policy Electronic Ticketing System Version 4.8 Opal Refund and Balance Transfer Policy Contents 1. Introduction 2. Definitions 3. Reloadable Opal Cards A. Refunds B. Balance Transfers C. Adjustments 4. Single Trip Tickets A. Refunds B. Transfers 5. Opal Top Up and Single Trip Ticket Machine Transactional Errors A. Reimbursements B. Transfers 6. Approved Payment Device (Contactless Payments) A. Reimbursements 7. Opal Digital Cards A. Refunds B. Reimbursements 8. Forms 2 1. Introduction This Opal Refund and Balance Transfer Policy: I. sets out the terms upon which we will provide refunds under the Opal Ticketing System for reloadable Opal Cards and Single Trip Tickets; II. describes the terms upon which we will transfer the balance of a reloadable Opal Card and the cost of a Faulty Single Trip Ticket to another Opal Card; III. describes the terms upon which we will issue adjustments to the Opal Balance of a reloadable Opal Card; IV. describes the terms upon which we will issue a reimbursement for a transactional error when an Opal Top Up and Single Trip Ticket machine is faulty or malfunctions; and V. describes the terms upon which we will issue a reimbursement for an error when a fare using the Opal Ticketing System is purchased using a Device for the Designated Services; VI. describes the terms upon which we will issue a reimbursement of the Reimbursable Amount for a Device Transactional Error for Approved Payment Devices and Opal Digital Cards; VII. describes the terms upon which we will provide refunds under the Opal Ticketing System for Opal Digital Cards; 2. -
Federal Highway Administration Wasikg!N3gtq[S!;, D.C
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION WASIKG!N3GTQ[S!;, D.C. 20590 REMARKS OF FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR F. C. TURNER FOR DELIVERY AT THE MID-YEAR CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAN TRANSIT ASSOCIATION AT MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, MARCH 30, 1971 "LET US FORM AN ALLIANCE" The winds of change are sweeping the Nation more powerfully today than they have in many a decade. Change is everywhere. Values have changed. Priorities have changed. Our concerns have changed. I think it is safe to say that, consciously or subconsciously, most of us have changed to some degree in the past few years. This is natural, for change is inevitable. While the effects of change often are temporarily painful and sometimes difficult to adjust to -- change in itself is desirable. It prevents stagnation and atrophy it generates new ideas, new philosophies. As with other aspects of our national life, the highway program, -more - too, has changed. We are doing things differently -- and better -- than we used to do. We have new goals, and new philosophies as to the best way of attaining them. One of these new philosophies is the emphasis we are placing now on moving people over urban freeways, rather than merely vehicle We feel it is essential that the greatest productivity be realized from our investment in urban freeways. It is from this standpoint that I come here today to urge, as it were, a "grand alliance" between those of you who provide and operate the Nation's transit facilities and those of us who are concerned with development of the Nation's highway plant. -
Rush Hour, New York
National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS American Paintings, 1900–1945 Max Weber American, born Poland, 1881 - 1961 Rush Hour, New York 1915 oil on canvas overall: 92 x 76.9 cm (36 1/4 x 30 1/4 in.) framed: 111.7 x 95.9 cm (44 x 37 3/4 in.) Inscription: lower right: MAX WEBER 1915 Gift of the Avalon Foundation 1970.6.1 ENTRY Aptly described by Alfred Barr, the scholar and first director of the Museum of Modern Art, as a "kinetograph of the flickering shutters of speed through subways and under skyscrapers," [1] Rush Hour, New York is arguably the most important of Max Weber’s early modernist works. The painting combines the shallow, fragmented spaces of cubism with the rhythmic, rapid-fire forms of futurism to capture New York City's frenetic pace and dynamism. [2] New York’s new mass transit systems, the elevated railways (or “els”) and subways, were among the most visible products of the new urban age. Such a subject was ideally suited to the new visual languages of modernism that Weber learned about during his earlier encounters with Pablo Picasso (Spanish, 1881 - 1973) and the circle of artists who gathered around Gertrude Stein in Paris in the first decade of the 20th century. Weber had previously dealt with the theme of urban transportation in New York [fig. 1], in which he employed undulating serpentine forms to indicate the paths of elevated trains through lower Manhattan's skyscrapers and over the Brooklyn Bridge. In 1915, in addition to Rush Hour, he also painted Grand Central Terminal [fig. -
270 L70 271 273 274
270 L70 271 273 274 Terrey Hills, Belrose & Davidson to City servicing Frenchs Forest & Forestville How to use this timetable Fares This timetable provides a snap shot of service information in 24-hour To travel on public transport in Sydney and surrounding regions, an time (e.g. 5am = 05:00, 5pm = 17:00). Information contained in Opal card is the cheapest and easiest ticket option. this timetable is subject to change without notice. Please note that An Opal card is a smartcard you keep and reuse. You put credit onto timetables do not include minor stops, additional trips for special the card then tap on and tap off to pay your fares throughout Sydney, events, short term changes, holiday timetable changes, real-time the Blue Mountains, Central Coast, Hunter and Illawarra, along with information or any disruption alerts. Intercity Trains in the Southern Highlands and South Coast. For the most up-to-date times, use the Trip Planner or Departures on Fares are based on: transportnsw.info • the type of Opal card you use Real-time trip planning • the distance you travel from tap on to tap off You can plan your trip with real-time information using the Trip • the mode of transport you choose Planner or Departures on transportnsw.info or by downloading travel • any Opal benefits such as discounts and capped fares that apply. apps on your smartphone or tablet. Find out about Opal fares and benefits at transportnsw.info/opal The Trip Planner, Departures and travel apps offer various features: • favourite your regular trips Which Opal card is right for you? • see where your service is on the route Adult – For customers 16 years and over who are not entitled to any concessions. -
Public Understanding of State Hwy Access Management Issues
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT ISSUES Prepared by: Market Research Unit - M.S. 150 Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55155 Prepared for: Office of Access Management - M.S. 125 Minnesota Department of Transportation 555 Park Street St. Paul, MN 55103 Prepared with Cook Research & Consulting, Inc. assistance from: Minneapolis, MN Project M-344 JUNE 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTION A. Background ............................................... 1 B. Study Objectives ........................................... 2 C. Methodology .............................................. 4 II. DETAILED FINDINGS ......................................... 7 A. Duluth -- U S Highway 53/State Highway 194 ..................... 7 1. Description of Study Area .................................. 7 2. General Attitudes/Behavior ................................ 7 a. Respondents' Use of Roadway ........................... 8 b. Roadway Purpose ..................................... 8 c. Traffic Flow vs. Access to Businesses ..................... 9 3. Perceived Changes in Study Area .......................... 10 a. Changes to Roadway ................................. 10 b. Changes in Land Use ................................. 11 c. Land Use/Roadway Relationship ........................ 11 4. Roadway Usefulness .................................... 11 a. How Well Does the Road Work? ........................ 11 b. Have You Changed How You Drive the Road? ............. 12 c. Safety/Risks of -
Appendix A: Charge to the Special Transit Advisory Commission Page
Appendix A: Charge to the Special Transit Advisory Commission Joint MPO STAC Charge to the Commission The Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) and the N.C. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) have concluded that providing well- planned and timely major regional transit investments is a very important part of maintaining the Triangle region’s current levels of transportation mobility, high quality of life and economic prosperity. Therefore, the MPOs have agreed to pursue the joint development of a Regional Transit Vision Plan for a regional transit system to serve as the foundation for making comprehensive, cooperative, and well- coordinated decisions on future major transit investments. The development of this plan should include a robust public outreach/community engagement effort and a process for establishing priorities for regional transit investments. The two MPOs have also agreed to appoint a Joint MPO Special Transit Advisory Commission to assist them in the development of the Regional Transit Vision Plan (RTVP). This commission will deliver to the region’s two MPOs a set of recommended major transit investments to serve the Triangle based on: Guiding principles for transit investments The Transit Infrastructure Blueprint Project analysis Priorities for transit investments A community engagement process Tasks To accomplish its overall mission, the commission may engage in any and all of the following focus areas. MPO and other staff will provide technical assistance to the commission for these tasks. 1. Review existing transit plans and relevant sections of the 2030 Long Range Transportation Plans, including the goals and objectives stated in those plans. -
Bus Rapid Transit for New York City
Bus Rapid Transit For New York City Prepared for Transportation Alternatives NYPIRG Straphangers Campaign June 2002 Schaller Consulting 94 Windsor Place, Brooklyn, NY (718) 768-3487 [email protected] www.schallerconsult.com Summary New York City has the slowest bus service in America. NYC Transit buses travel at an average speed of 7.5 mph. On bus routes such as the M96, M23, M15, Q32, BX35 and B63, the average speed is 6 mph or less. That buses are traveling in slow motion is obvious to everyone, especially riders, who rank it the most serious problem with bus service. Slow bus service discourages people from taking buses, especially for work trips where travel time is critical. Slow bus service contributes to very long travel times to work in New York City, as shown by the latest census. Bus service is slow for many reasons. Traffic congestion is clearly a major factor. But other problems are just as important: • Buses spend as much as 30% of their time waiting for passengers to board and exit. • Increased crowding on buses due to ridership growth has lengthened delays from boarding and exiting. • Traffic signals are not synchronized with bus speeds, so buses are delayed by red lights between bus stops. • Drivers often have to slow down to stay on schedule even when traffic is light. • Bus field supervisors lack the tools to prevent bus bunching. SCHALLER CONSULTING 1 Summary (cont.) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is a promising strategy for improving bus service. By applying features used in rail service to bus service, BRT can make buses faster, more reliable and more attractive.