Curriculum Vitae of J. Bruce Jacobs (29 December 2015)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Communiqué No. 151), and Photo: Taiwan Communiqué Kept Building Her Momentum in the Successive Months with Solid Work at the Grassroots and Policy Level
Taiwan Communiqué Published by: Formosan Association for Public Affairs 552 7th St. SE, Washington, D.C. 20003 Tel. (202) 547-3686 International edition, September / October 2015 Published 5 times a year ISSN number: 1027-3999 152 Election campaign in full swing Tsai Ing-wen maintains strong lead During the past three months, Taiwan’s presidential and legislative election campaign has intensified, and also taken some fascinating turns. The decision by the Kuomintang to formally make Ms. Hung Hsiu-chu its presidential candidate was unexpected, while the entry of old-timer James Soong of the People First Party also significantly changed the equation. More on those developments below. But the most constant factor was the steady, and even increasing, lead by DPP candidate, Dr. Tsai Ing-wen. After her nomination in mid-April 2015 she was already the clear favorite. She solidified her lead with a highly successful visit to Washington DC in early June 2015 (see Taiwan Communiqué no. 151), and Photo: Taiwan Communiqué kept building her momentum in the successive months with solid work at the grassroots and policy level. While in most opinion polls in late June 2015, Dr. Tsai received between 27 and 40% in a hypothetical three way race (at that point James Soong had not declared his candidacy yet), in late September 2015, most polls Dr. Tsai Ing-wen being welcomed by Taiwanese- gave her a healthy 44-45%. If Americans in Washington on 1 June 2015 Taiwan Communiqué -2- September / October 2015 one would normalize that to account for the people not responding, this would mean a support rate of some 56-58% in the actual elections. -
Torn Between Two Worlds: Rev. Shoki Coe, Domesticity and the Taiwanese Self-Determination Movement
Torn Between Two Worlds: Rev. Shoki Coe, Domesticity and the Taiwanese Self-Determination Movement I am now living on “borrowed time”. It is in “borrowed time” that I am now trying to write a memoir of “my” existence, which began in 1914 and may end any time. Is there a point in my trying to do this? It all depends on the philosophical and, for me, especially, the theological question “Is there any meaning at all in time and history? Shoki Coe (1988).1 Unborn generations will think it strange that the vastness, the completeness, the pervasive force of missionary enterprise, made so small an impression on the public mind [...] Like leaven, [the Christians] are hid among the people. They are the scattered lights of a country-side. In this village, where we stand, there is but one Christian. Yonder, half a mile to the north, live thirty worshippers; in a village two miles south, about a dozen; in that hamlet, half a mile to the east, are two Christian families.2 These words were written by Campbell Moody, a missionary of the Presbyterian Church of England (PCE), who arrived in Taiwan on 18 December 1895.3 His arrival coincided with a moment of great change not only for the mission enterprise but also for the island and its peoples. Only two months prior to his arrival had the Japanese formally declared the island pacified following its incorporation into the Japanese Empire as a condition of the Treaty of Shimonoseki.4 The growth and future influence of the Presbyterian Mission were largely underestimated by Moody. -
Taiwan's Presidential Elections Referendum Versus China's Missiles
Published by: International Committee for Human Rights in Taiwan Taiwan : 4Fl., 5 Ching-tao East Rd., TAIPEI, Taiwan Europe : Saffierhorst 21, 2592 GJ THE HAGUE, The Netherlands Canada : 420 Horner Ave., TORONTO, ONT M8W 2A4 U.S.A. : P.O. Box 15182, CHEVY CHASE, MD 20825-5182 Special International edition, January 2004 Published 6 times a year Issue ISSN number: 1027-3999 106 Taiwan’s Presidential elections Referendum versus China's missiles Presidential elections are coming up again in Taiwan on 20 March 2004. This will be only the third time in history that such elections are held on the island: Until the mid-1980s, Taiwan suffered under the harsh one-party rule of the Kuomintang. In 1992, the people on the island voted for the first time for a fully democratically-elected parliament, the Legislative Yuan, while the first presidential elections were held only in 1996. In the second presidential elections, in March 2000, President Chen Shui-bian was elected as the first president from the Taiwanese democratic opposition of the DPP — in spite of strong threats and intimidation by China. Now he is up for reelection, and is running with vice- Photo: Taipei Times President Annette Lu against a combined ticket of the KMT’s Lien Chan and the PFP’s James Soong. In 2000, these two ran separately — a split which helped make it possible for Chen Shui- bian to get elected. The present election cam- paign is enlivened by a heated international de- bate about Taiwan’s Pan-green Presidential and vice-Presidential incumbents Chen Shui-bian and Annette Lu Taiwan Communiqué -2- January 2004 brand-new referendum law, passed by the Legislative Yuan on 27 November 2003, and signed into law by the President on 31 December. -
Academic Apologists for the KMT’S Authoritarian Rule: Ramon H
1 Academic Apologists for the KMT’s Authoritarian Rule: Ramon H. Myers and Thomas A. Metzger By Linda Gail Arrigo, Ph.D. Sociology Post-Doctoral Scholar, Academia Sinica, Institute of Sociology Contacts: [email protected], Taipei (02) 2234-9680, 0928-899-931 Prepared for the North American Taiwan Studies Association Conference June 17-20, 2004, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu First Draft, June 15, 2004 Introduction This analysis of the writings of Ramon H. Myers, and secondarily Thomas A. Metzger, concerning Taiwan from 1980 to the present places them in the context of the political developments of this period. Basically Myers closely follows the themes of Chinese Nationalist Party (Kuomintang, KMT) propaganda in various periods, from the suppression of the 1978-79 democratic movement in the name of KMT-defined social stability and anti-communism, through downplaying human rights issues in China for the sake of rapprochement, to decrying the rise of Taiwan nationalism accompanying the democratic election of Chen Shui-bian in 2000. The putative values of democracy and human rights that have been put forth in these writings are attenuated by the priority given to regime stability, economic growth and U.S. interests. The underlying assumptions of these writings are that elections and manifestations of intellectual expression in civil society are due to the benevolence of rulers, and martial law controls on speech and publication can be justified under the regime’s subjective need for legitimization. That is, human and civil rights are not an inalienable property of the people; in this respect, this author profoundly subverts commonly accepted standards of democracy. -
A Beautiful View from the Brink: Linda Gail Arrigo and the Taiwan Democratic Movement
How This Book Was Written I have witnessed nearly a half-century of Taiwan’s history. And I am blessed by having many friends who have been willing to help in my project of writing my biography. Of course it is not just my individual biography that they have feeling for, but the great hopes of the 1970-80s democratic movement of Taiwan. Chen Chu, now in her second term as mayor of Kaohsiung, pulled me into the fray in 1975. After Lynn Miles and I finished our anthology on foreigners in human rights work, A Borrowed Voice: Taiwan Human Rights Through International Networks, 1960-1980, our Taiwanese friends asked why there wasn’t a Chinese version they could read. By luck, Sue L. Yang, a Taiwanese-American in New Jersey who was involved in the overseas rescue campaign of 1980, agreed to translate Chapters 5 and 6 covering the 1978-79 movement and the subsequent trial. However, this account might be a rather dry read, except to those who remembered the times of state-sponsored terror. Fortunately, I met Rose Chia-yin Lin, young in age but experienced in several ways. Her undergraduate degree is in political science, so she understands radical sociology; and she worked with the Democratic Progressive Party in Tainan elections. She also interviewed former political prisoners for an oral history workshop and completed her master’s degree in public health. But it is Rose’s own bubbly zest for candid engagement which made her the right author for my biography. She said we should write a story the younger generation would read for fun while learning history on the way. -
Taiwan Communiqué Published By: Formosan Association for Public Affairs 552 7Th St
Taiwan Communiqué Published by: Formosan Association for Public Affairs 552 7th St. SE, Washington, D.C. 20003 Tel. (202) 547-3686 International edition, September/October 2008 Published 5 times a year 120 ISSN number: 1027-3999 Taiwan’s new political landscape As we have described in the previous two issues of Taiwan Communiqué, the political landscape in Taiwan has changed considerably during the past few months. The policies initiated by the new Ma Ying-jeou administration – and particularly his precipitous slide towards China — are worrying many Taiwanese. This became apparent when more than 150,000 Taiwanese rallied in Taipei on 30 August 2008. Below we present a brief summary of the event. We also present an analysis of the implications for US policy by Julian Baum, a veteran reporter on developments in Taiwan and China. August 30th rally in Taipei The rally was called on the occasion of the 100th day in office of President Ma Ying- jeou, and was coordinated by a group of civic organizations led by the Taiwan Society, formed by a group of promi- Photo: CNA nent scholars. The organiz- ers stated that they had called for the event because the economy has deteriorated significantly since Ma’s in- auguration on May 20th, while the new administra- tion has sacrificed Taiwan’s sovereignty in favor of closer ties with China. The rally started at 2:30 PM, when protesters braving the Crowd at August 30th rally in Taipei Taiwan Communiqué -2- September / October 2008 afternoon heat, and started walking from two points – Long-shan Temple and Chunghsiao East Rd – converging on the broad Ketagalan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office. -
Jimmy Carter╎s Human Rights Diplomacy and the Democratization
W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2017 Jimmy Carter’s Human Rights Diplomacy and the Democratization of Taiwan Cody A. Grogan College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Asian History Commons, Diplomatic History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Grogan, Cody A., "Jimmy Carter’s Human Rights Diplomacy and the Democratization of Taiwan" (2017). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1106. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1106 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Grogan 1 Jimmy Carter’s Human Rights Diplomacy and the Democratization of Taiwan Cody Grogan 5/1/2017 Table of Contents Introduction: A Brief History of Taiwan and Defining Human Rights ............................................. 2 Chapter 1: American Foreign Policy in the Republic of China ........................................................ 12 Chapter 2: Human Rights, China, and Arms Sales to Taiwan ........................................................... 26 Chapter 3: Repercussions of Normalization on Human Rights in Taiwan ...................................... 37 Chapter 4: Embassy Initiatives and Successes in Promoting Human Rights ................................... 48 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 62 Grogan 2 Introduction We can no longer separate the traditional issues of war and peace from the new global questions of justice, equity, and human rights. It is a new world, but America should not fear it. It is a new world, and we should help to shape it. -
Life Patterns Among Taiwanese-Americans
1 Patterns of Personal and Political Life Among Taiwanese-Americans Linda Gail Arrigo Post-Doc, Inst. of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 2002-04 Green Party Taiwan International Affairs Officer, 1997-present Tel: (886-2) 2662-3677 Fax: 2662-6897 Mobile: 0928-889-931 E-mail: [email protected] Mail: No. 38, 6F, Tsui-Gu Street, Shen Keng Township, Taipei County 222, TAIWAN 2006 submitted to Taiwan Inquiry , a journal of the North American Taiwanese Professors’ Association (earlier version was presented at the Asian-American Literature Conference May 7, 2005, Chinese College of Culture, Taipei, Taiwan) ABSTRACT Taiwanese migrated to the United States first as graduate students in science fields in the late 1960s and 1970s, and later also as investors and businessmen in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Although within the United States they were classified within the broad ethnic category “Chinese American”, among the migrants the sharp political and cultural divide between native Taiwanese and Chinese “mainlanders” within Taiwan of the early period was reproduced and in fact exaggerated overseas, where the migrants could opt for separate social circles and language usage in private life. Moreover, in the mid-1970’s Hokkien-speaking Taiwanese-Americans took up a strident and relatively unified community position in support of Taiwan’s democratization and independence that deeply affected their personal lives and their relations with their homeland, given the Taiwan government’s overseas network of spies and the blacklisting that denied them the right to return. With the rising clout of the native Taiwanese middle class in Taiwan and then political opening in the late 1980’s, tensions decreased, and the businessmen migrants contributed to the growth of enclaves dubbed “Little Taipei” such as in Flushing, New York and Monterey Park, California, where the native Taiwanese vs. -
Contesting the Past in the Present a Critique of Transitional Justice Scheme in Taiwan
Contesting the Past in the Present A critique of transitional justice scheme in Taiwan Ling-Yu Hsiao Newnham College Department of Sociology University of Cambridge This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2018 Contesting the Past in the Present— A critique of transitional justice scheme in Taiwan Ling-Yu Hsiao Abstract The White Terror in Taiwan was a 43-year period during which the Kuomintang (KMT) regime, with significant support from the United States during the Cold War era, persecuted its political opponents, imprisoning tens of thousands of people and executing some 1200. In the wake of democratisation since the 1980s, Taiwan has instituted a scheme of transitional justice to acknowledge and atone for the past political oppression and to promote national reconciliation. As this initiative was undertaken by the same regime that perpetrated the White Terror, questions of objectivity and transparency arise. Accordingly, this thesis aims to assess the progress of transitional justice in Taiwan by examining the official discourse on the subject and also analysing the non-official discourses amongst survivors of the White Terror in present-day Taiwan. Tensions between the different discourses are identified. This thesis focuses on the construction of the past in the present, which refers to contestation of the past in the context of present-day society in Taiwan. Drawing on discursive analysis of Taiwan’s transitional justice initiatives since the late 1990s, as well as in-depth interviews with 24 former political prisoners, it discerns how the official transitional justice discourse is circumscribed and limits our knowledge of the White Terror.