DOCSLIB.ORG

A Special Report on the European Union March 17Th 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Special Report on the European Union March 17Th 2007 Fit at 50? A special report on the European Union March 17th 2007 Republication, copying or redistribution by any means is expressly prohibited without the prior written permission of The Economist The Economist March 17th 2007 A special report on the European Union 1 Fit at 50? Also in this section Are you sitting comfortably? A brief refresher course on the workings of the European Union. Page 2 The quest for prosperity Europe’s economy has been underperform- ing. But whose fault is that? Page 3 Constitutional conundrum Damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Page 5 The ins and outs The EU’s most eective foreign-policy instru- ment has been enlargement. But how far can it go? Page 8 Four Ds for Europe Dealing with the dreaded democratic decit. The European Union has been far more successful than anyone Page 11 expected when the Treaty of Rome was signed half a century ago. But, argues John Peet, it now has three big problems to solve The European Union at 100 N MARCH 25th 1957 a gaggle of lead- the project’s historyworse than the per- Is the best yet to come? Page 14 Oers from six European countries iod of Charles de Gaulle’s empty chair in (France, West Germany, Italy and the Be- 1965, or Margaret Thatcher’s persistent de- nelux trio) met in the great hall of the Hora- mands for our own money back be- tii and the Curiatii in Rome’s Capitoline tween 1979 and 1984. museum. Behind them two 17th-century Yet today’s diculties should not be al- frescoes depicted ancient Rome’s bloody lowed to obscure Europe’s achievements history: a suitable backdrop, since one of of the past 50 years. True federalists actu- their concerns was to prevent a recurrence ally saw the Treaty of Rome as a move of Europe’s internecine wars. They signed away from the building of a European su- a treaty to establish a European Economic perstate that they had hoped would de- Community (EEC), soon to become velop from the European Coal and Steel known as the common market. Next week- Community, set up in 1951. But in fact the end the present crop of European Union EEC grew out of two other events: the leaders will gather in Berlin (because Ger- French National Assembly’s rejection of many holds the rotating EU presidency) to the proposed European Defence Commu- Acknowledgments mark the 50th anniversary of this historic nity in 1954 and the Suez crisis of 1956. The The author wishes to thank those who gave time for inter- views, not all of whom are mentioned in the text. Special step towards European integration. rst pointed to a reassertion of nation- thanks are due to José Manuel Barroso and his fellow Euro- The German chancellor, Angela Mer- states at the heart of Europe; the second led pean commissioners; to Martin Schulz, Graham Watson, El- kel, wants the Berlin summit to issue a France to conclude that a European com- mar Brok, Alain Lamassoure, Bronislaw Geremek, Inigo Mendez de Vigo and James Elles at the European Parlia- ringing declaration about the values and munity was in its vital interest. ment; to the Danish foreign ministry; to François Heis- successes of the EU. She sees this as a way A bigger objection to the EEC was that it bourg, Charles Grant, Pavel Swieboda, Paul Hofheinz, Jean to relaunch the European project, which covered only a small part of Europe. So- Pisani-Ferry and André Sapir among think-tankers; and to Jacques Delors, Peter Sutherland, Chris Patten, John Kerr, many think has been in serious trouble viet-dominated eastern Europe was ex- Patrick Messerlin and Timothy Garton Ash. ever since French and Dutch voters re- cluded, as were fascist Spain and Portugal, jected the draft EU constitution in the sum- because they were not democracies. But A list of sources is at mer of 2005. Shortly afterwards Jean- Britain and others chose to stand aside, ei- www.economist.com/specialreports Claude Juncker, prime minister of Luxem- ther because they disliked the political bourg, which then held the EU’s integration implicit in the new grouping or An audio interview with the author is at presidency, declared solemnly that the because they wanted to preserve their www.economist.com/audio EU is not in crisis; it is in deep crisis. neutrality. Indeed, two years after the Jacques Delors, who was president of the Treaty of Rome came into force, seven A brieng on the EU is at European Commission from 1985 to 1994, countries (Austria, Britain, Denmark, Nor- www.economist.com/europeanunion says that the present crisis is the worst in way, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland)1 2 A special report on the European Union The Economist March 17th 2007 A brief refresher course on the Are you sitting comfortably? workings of the European Union HE nuts and bolts of the European tates every six months, so each country aairs, the parliament has no say. The TUnion are hardly riveting, but a basic now gets to be in the chair once every 13½ parliament has to approve the choice of knowledge of its institutions is essential years. The council often makes decisions commission president and can dismiss to understanding how it works, so here is by qualied majority, a weighted system the entire commission, but not individual a quick reminder. of national votes, but on some issues (eg, commissioners. At the heart of the EU, as envisaged by taxation) it has to be unanimous. The European Court of Justice, based its French founding father, Jean Monnet, As part of the council, the high repre- in Luxembourg, acts as the EU’s supreme is the European Commission, to which sentative for foreign policy reports to na- court in areas for which the union is each national government appoints one tional governments and may (or may not) responsible (which does not include commissioner for a ve-year term. The work closely with the commissioner for criminal law, for example). There is one college of 27 commissioners sits atop a external aairs. The common foreign and judge per country. A court of rst instance 20,000-strong bureaucracy that consti- security policy he runs is not part of the helps with the caseload. Cases are de- tutes the EU’s executive. The commission classic Monnet machinery (sometimes cided by simple majority. Luxembourg also has the sole right of initiating legisla- known as the community method), but also hosts the Court of Auditors, which tion, administers the budget and has is formulated by the member govern- checks EU spendingand qualies the ac- other independent powers including de- ments. The same is true for most policies counts every year. ciding competition cases and represent- on justice and home aairs. The EU has a plethora of other agen- ing the union in trade negotiations. The other law- and budget-making cies, as well as the Luxembourg-based The commission takes its political cue body is the European Parliament. It has European Investment Bank, the world’s from the European Council, made up of 785 members, directly elected in rough biggest multilateral borrower. Among the the 27 heads of government, which meets proportion to each country’s population. more puzzling are two Brussels-based ad- four times a year and also nominates the Like the commission, the parliament visory bodies: the Economic and Social commission president. The European serves for ve years; unlike the commis- Committee, which brings together the Council is, in practice, the highest incar- sion, which is in Brussels, it holds its ple- social partners, and the eponymous nation of the Council of Ministers, the nary meetings mostly in Strasbourg, Committee of the Regions. Between them main law- and budget-making body, though committees meet in Brussels. they cost some 150m ($200m) a year to which brings together national ministers Most EU laws are subject to co-decision run, and nobody can remember what (eg, of nance, foreign aairs or agricul- by the council and parliament, but in they are for. But this being the EU, nobody ture). The presidency of the council ro- some areas, including justice and home dares to scrap them either. 2 set up the rival European Free-Trade Asso- they would instantly qualify for member- change. It has sent troops as far aeld as ciation (EFTA). Seven and Six was how ship are Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. Aceh and Congo and co-ordinated big na- this newspaper greeted the news. The European Union has also moved tional deployments in Lebanon. It has Fifty years later the European Econ- far beyond the economic sphere. The com- started membership negotiations with omic Community has changed out of all pletion of the single market was set in train Croatia and, most momentously, with Tur- recognition, having metamorphosed into only in the 1980s and remains a work in key. Claims that this club has been unable the European Union and grown far be- progress. But just as the American govern- to function since 2005 seem overblown. yond the original six members. Despite ment used the constitution’s interstate the EFTA experiment, Britain applied for commerce clause to expand its powers, so The 50-year itch membership only four years after the the European institutions have exploited Yet the EU does face three huge, related pro- Treaty of Rome, but was blocked by de single-market rules to extend their respon- blems. The rst is what to do about its draft Gaulle’s veto and did not join until 1973, sibilities into such areas as social policy, constitution, which was signed in October along with Denmark and Ireland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Success Story Or a Failure? : Representing the European Integration in the Curricula and Textbooks of Five Countries
    I Inari Sakki A Success Story or a Failure? Representing the European Integration in the Curricula and Textbooks of Five Countries II Social psychological studies 25 Publisher: Social Psychology, Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki Editorial Board: Klaus Helkama, Chair Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti, Editor Karmela Liebkind Anna-Maija Pirttilä-Backman Kari Mikko Vesala Maaret Wager Jukka Lipponen Copyright: Inari Sakki and Unit of Social Psychology University of Helsinki P.O. Box 4 FIN-00014 University of Helsinki I wish to thank the many publishers who have kindly given the permission to use visual material from their textbooks as illustrations of the analysis. All efforts were made to find the copyright holders, but sometimes without success. Thus, I want to apologise for any omissions. ISBN 978-952-10-6423-4 (Print) ISBN 978-952-10-6424-1 (PDF) ISSN 1457-0475 Cover design: Mari Soini Yliopistopaino, Helsinki, 2010 III ABSTRAKTI Euroopan yhdentymisprosessin edetessä ja syventyessä kasvavat myös vaatimukset sen oikeutuksesta. Tästä osoituksena ovat muun muassa viimeaikaiset mediassa käydyt keskustelut EU:n perustuslakiäänestysten seurauksista, kansalaisten EU:ta ja euroa kohtaan osoittamasta ja tuntemasta epäluottamuksesta ja Turkin EU-jäsenyydestä. Taloudelliset ja poliittiset argumentit tiiviimmän yhteistyön puolesta eivät aina riitä kansalaisten tuen saamiseen ja yhdeksi ratkaisuksi on esitetty yhteisen identiteetin etsimistä. Eurooppalaisen identiteetin sanotaan voivan parhaiten muodostua silloin, kun perheen, koulutuksen
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union in Transition: the Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; a Constitution in Doubt
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 2 2003 Article 1 The European Union in Transition: The Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; A Constitution in Doubt Roger J. Goebel∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The European Union in Transition: The Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; A Constitution in Doubt Roger J. Goebel Abstract This Article is intended to provide an overview of this transitional moment in the history of the European Union. Initially, the Article will briefly review the background of the Treaty of Nice, and the institutional structure modifications for which it provides, which paves the way for enlargement. Next it will describe the final stages of the enlargement process. Finally, the Article will set out the principal institutional innovations and certain other key aspects of the draft Constitution, the most important issues concerning them, and the current impasse. THE EUROPEAN UNION IN TRANSITION: THE TREATY OF NICE IN EFFECT; ENLARGEMENT IN SIGHT; A CONSTITUTION IN DOUBT Rogerj Goebel* INTRODUCTION Once again the European Union' (the "EU" or the "Union") is in a stage of radical evolution. Since the early 1990's, the EU has anticipated an extraordinary increase in its constituent Member States2 through the absorption of a large number of Central European and Mediterranean nations. Since the late 1990's, the Union has been negotiating the precise terms for their entry with a dozen applicant nations and has been providing cooperative assistance to them to prepare for their accession to the Union and in particular, its principal con- stituent part, the European Community.3 As this enlargement of the Union came more clearly in sight, the political leadership and the present Member States, joined by the Commission, con- * Professor and Director of the Center on European Union Law, Fordham Univer- sity School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolae Europaeae
    SYMBOLAE EUROPAEAE POLITECHNIKA KOSZALIŃSKA SYMBOLAE EUROPAEAE STUDIA HUMANISTYCZNE POLITECHNIKI KOSZALIŃSKIEJ nr 8 Filozofia, historia, język i literatura, nauki o polityce KOSZALIN 2015 ISSN 1896-8945 Komitet Redakcyjny Bolesław Andrzejewski (przewodniczący) Zbigniew Danielewicz Małgorzata Sikora-Gaca (sekretarz) Redaktor statystyczny Urszula Kosowska Przewodniczący Uczelnianej Rady Wydawniczej Mirosław Maliński Projekt okładki Agnieszka Bil Skład, łamanie Karolina Ziobro © Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Politechniki Koszalińskiej Koszalin 2015 WYDAWNICTWO UCZELNIANE POLITECHNIKI KOSZALIŃSKIEJ 75-620 Koszalin, ul. Racławicka 15-17 —————————————————————————————————— Koszalin 2015, wyd. I, ark. wyd. …, format B-5, nakład 100 egz. Druk Spis treści FILOZOFIA BOLESŁAW ANDRZEJEWSKI Komunikacyjne aspekty filozofii chrześcijańskiej w średniowieczu .................. 7 ZBIGNIEW DANIELEWICZ Leszka Kołakowskiego apologia Jezusa w kulturze Europy ............................ 19 MAGDALENA FILIPIAK Status konsensualnej koncepcji prawdy w komunikacyjnym projekcie filozofii Karla-Otto Apla ............................................................................................... 33 HISTORIA BOGUSŁAW POLAK Biskup Józef Gawlina wobec powstań śląskich i wielkopolskiego 1918-1921 ....................................................................................................... 45 MICHAŁ POLAK, KATARZYNA POLAK Działalność Polskiego Komitetu Ruchu Europejskiego na rzecz sprawy polskiej w latach 1964-1978 ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions*
    Journal of Common Market Studies Vol. 37, No. 1 March 1999 pp. 59–85 Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions* ANDREW MORAVCSIK and KALYPSO NICOLAÏDIS Harvard University Abstract This article offers a basic explanation of the process and outcome of negotiat- ing the Treaty of Amsterdam. We pose three questions: What explains the national preferences of the major governments? Given those substantive national preferences, what explains bargaining outcomes among them? Given those substantive bargains, what explains the choice of international institu- tions to implement them? We argue in favour of an explanation based on three elements. Issue-specific interdependence explains national preferences. Inter- state bargaining based on asymmetrical interdependence explains the out- comes of substantive negotiation. The need for credible commitments explains institutional choices to pool and delegate sovereignty. Other oft-cited factors – European ideology, supranational entrepreneurship, technocratic consider- ations, or the random flux and non-rational processes of ‘garbage can’ decision-making – play secondary roles. Remaining areas of ambiguity are flagged for future research. * We would like to thank Simon Bulmer, Noreen Burrows, Stanley Crossick, Richard Corbett, Franklin Dehousse, Youri Devuyst, Geoffrey Edwards, Nigel Evans, Stephen George, Simon Hix, Karl Johansson, Nikos Kotzias, Sonia Mazey, John Peterson, Constantino Papadopoulos, Michel Petite, Eric Philippart, Jeremy Richardson, Brendon Smith, Alexander Stubb, Helen Wallace, William Wallace, Alison Weston and Neil Winn for assistance and conversations. In the current version we have cited only essential sources, for example those underlying direct quotations. An extended version can be found in Moravcsik and Nicolaïdis (forthcoming). © Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1999, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA 60 ANDREW MORAVCSIK AND KALYPSO NICOLAÏDIS I.
    [Show full text]
  • 60Th Anniversary of the Treaty of Rome
    60 YEARS OF THE ROME TREATY AND ITS ETERNAL LEGACY FOR THE EUROPEAN PROJECT “The Community shall have as its task, by establishing a common market and progressively approximating the economic policies of Member States, to promote throughout the Community a harmonious development of economic activities, a continuous and balanced expansion, an increase in stability, an accelerated raising of the standard of living and closer relations between the States belonging to it.” Article 2, Part 1 titled “Principles” of the Treaty of Rome The Treaty of Rome was signed in the so- called Eternal City of Rome exactly sixty years ago, on 25 March 1957. Together with the Treaty of Paris of 1951, the Rome Treaty is the most important legal basis for the modern-day European Union. This epoch-making document laid down the key foundations of the greatest integration of peoples and nations in European history that made Europe one of the most peaceful, prosperous, stable and advanced regions of the world. The 60th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty is an important opportunity to remind ourselves of the original goals of European integration and the Treaty of Rome Ceremony Source: European Commission achievements the idea of united Europe has brought to our continent over the past six decades. The fundamental legacy of the Rome Treaty needs to serve the EU Member States as a recipe how to resolve the serious crises the EU is facing nowadays and re- unite all Europeans for a common path towards an “ever closer union”. A LESSON OF WAR sixty million human lives and devastated CATASTROPHE AND THE Europe beyond recognition in all aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Development of European Integration
    FACT SHEETS ON THE EUROPEAN UNION The historical development of European integration PE 618.969 1. The First Treaties.....................................................................................................3 2. Developments up to the Single European Act.........................................................6 3. The Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties...............................................................10 4. The Treaty of Nice and the Convention on the Future of Europe..........................14 5. The Treaty of Lisbon..............................................................................................18 EN - 18/06/2018 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This leaflet contains a compilation of Fact Sheets provided by Parliament’s Policy Departments and Economic Governance Support Unit on the relevant policy area. The Fact Sheets are updated regularly and published on the website of the European Parliament: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets ABOUT THE PUBLISHER Author of the publication: European Parliament Department responsible: Unit for Coordination of Editorial and Communication Activities E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in June, 2018 © European Union, 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice
    [Show full text]
  • OCR GCE Government and Politics
    Government and Politics GCE Government and Politics Delivery Guide The European Union www.ocr.org.uk Oxford Cambridge and RSA GCE Government and Politics Delivery Guide CONTENTS Introduction Page 3 Curriculum Content Page 4 Thinking Conceptually Page 5 Thinking Contextually Page 7 2 Introduction Delivery guides are designed to represent a body of knowledge about teaching a particular topic and contain: KEY • Content: A clear outline of the content covered by the Click to view associated resources delivery guide; within this document. • Thinking Conceptually: Expert guidance on the key concepts involved, common difficulties students may have, approaches to teaching that can help students Click to view external resources understand these concepts and how this topic links conceptually to other areas of the subject; • Thinking Contextually: A range of suggested teaching activities using a variety of themes so that different activities can be selected which best suit particular classes, learning styles or teaching approaches. If you have any feedback on this Delivery Guide or suggestions for other resources you would like OCR to develop, please email [email protected] 3 Curriculum Content The European Union Concepts: federalism; devolution; subsidiarity; sovereignty The EU Nature; origins; aims and objectives. The structure of the EU The Council; the Council of Ministers; the Commission; the European Parliament; the European Court of Justice; the decision-making process. How decisions are made Policy-making processes; role and power of major EU bodies and member states. The impact of membership of the EU on the British Impact on British government and politics; issues such as government, politics and constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Joerg Neuheiser Time
    HIEU 171/271: The Two Germanies since 1945 Winter 2018 Instructor: Joerg Neuheiser Time: Tuesdays, 3.30 – 6.20 pm Place: John Marino Room, 6th floor (H&SS 6008) Office Hours: HSS 6071, Thursdays, 10am-12noon, and by appointment Email: [email protected] Course Description Demilitarization, Democratization, Denazification and Decentralization: These were the four “Ds” that the allied victors set as their goals for Germany’s future in 1945. The story of the two German states that quickly emerged under the conditions of the Cold War can be understood as a constant struggle to achieve these goals. What is true democracy? How could the perpetrators of the Holocaust be turned into trustworthy democrats, and how could a democratic Germany contribute to a peaceful post-war international order? This seminar seeks to explore the different paths that the capitalist West and the communist East took after 1945, emphasizing the extent to which policies in both states were always dependent on one another. In particular, it will take a look at calls for democratization in both German states since the 1960s, including the 1968 student revolution in the West and the East German civil rights movement that evolved in the late 1980s. Finally, the course will analyze how the legacies of both German states continue to shape Germany after reunification and how today’s Germany deals with challenges to democracy in light of its totalitarian past Course Requirements: This seminar class can only succeed if everybody attends regularly and participates in class discussions. Each student will introduce the readings for one week in a brief presentation (10 min).
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Treaty of Rome
    European Parliament Treaty Of Rome Paling and untranquil Raj often derrick some exams estimably or cribbles blankly. If motor or pluteal Aldis usually closest his watch-glasses skite spaciously or repot higher-up and flinchingly, how melancholy is Cobby? Paddie methodised slack. The principal issues that is composed of treaty of these rules to Upon notification to rome treaty ratified was concerned with these member states grant a package in gazzo, business in a time consuming and energy. Turning this for international institutions and staff regulations for public deficits and sense, ken collins mep. Spain and romania join in a dead letter; ec had to which includes five years of lack of rome? Treaties reveal a european treaty. Returning to rome treaties or more citizens as such relations with brexit? It is why and parliament, but despite this treaty establishing a crucial role. Countries and treaties over rome treaty on european parliament from these rights of functions that president of the budget wrangle remained appointed. Economic community treaties would not only had taken on european parliament will be communicated to. Treaty of rome for european parliament. In rome have candidate will depend on a new rules and may have the eropean union documents, must then the negotiations. Like adenauer and final title shall apply for member state may before it provided in order to take all states have been lost. Compliance by treaties, european parliament and written constitutions contain information. The ecsc would be better, the proposal from member state or international organisation, foreign ministers and west germany, services between france and opposing economic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • CDL(1993)001</A>Rev
    CDL(1993)001e-rev-restr Strasbourg, 15 February 1993 DECENTRALISATION OF THE STATE IN THE PROCESS OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION OPINION The adoption of the Maastricht treaty offers an opportunity for a fresh look at this issue. The treaty explicitly affirms the subsidiarity principle, first in general[1], and then with specific reference to relations between the Community and its member states[2]. The general statement of the principle is very vague, simply stipulating that "decisions are taken as closely as possible to the citizen"[3]. The legal implications of this are difficult to ascertain, but they do go beyond relations between the Community and its member states, and so affect the distribution of powers within states. It is clear, however, that state structures will not be directly modified or harmonised by this principle. Instead, it should be regarded as a programme provision which is not truly binding, and which governments are largely left to interpret. It should certainly pose no special problems for Italy, which devolves certain powers to the regions without being a federal state, and is therefore an extreme example neither of centralism nor of federalism. A few remarks on the subsidiarity principle in general may nonetheless be useful. Under this principle, central authorities should have a subsidiary function, performing only those tasks which cannot be performed effectively at a more immediate or local level[4]. Obviously, opinions regarding the possibility of taking effective action at a lower level are determined by standpoint. While a federalist will assume that most questions can be dealt at a lower level, and give central government only those powers which it really requires, a centralist will regard local authorities as essentially ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Research BOSTON COLLEGE LAW LIBRARY
    LEGAL RESEARCH GUIDE #9 European Union Research BOSTON COLLEGE LAW LIBRARY INTRODUCTION Post-World War II Europe The European Union has its origins in the period following the end of World War II in 1945. Faced with political and economic uncertainty, many nations in western Europe began to consider the possibilities of increased cooperation as a means of improving economic performance and providing increased security. The Organization for European Economic Cooperation was created in 1948 as a multinational agency to assist in the administration of the Marshall Plan for the reconstruction of western Europe. Further multinational cooperation was fostered by the Council of Europe, a consultative organization established in 1949 to promote common action in economic, social, cultural, scientific, legal and administrative matters. Beginnings of a Common Market The evolution of the European Union itself began in 1951 with the Treaty Establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (“ECSC”), 261 UNTS 140 (1951). This treaty provided a “common market” for the coal and steel industries of France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, with regulations for pricing, transportation, competition, employment, and the abolition of subsidies. When the ECSC proved successful, attention focused on the creation of a “common market” for other sectors of the economy and for further economic integration. Ministers of the six ECSC countries negotiated and concluded two treaties, signed at Rome in March, 1957. The Treaty of Rome, 298 UNTS 11 (1957), established the European Economic Community and the EURATOM Treaty, 298 UNTS 167 (1957), created the European Atomic Energy Community. Both of these organizations officially came into existence on January 1, 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • NWICO from a Vision of International Regulation to a Reality of Multilevel Governance
    The Rise and Fall of NWICO From a Vision of International Regulation to a Reality of Multilevel Governance ULLA CARLSSON Global flows of news and information were the sub- industrialized countries. “Development”, the process ject of intense debate in international fora in the of evolution toward a modern society, occupied 1970s. News gathering and reporting has been con- center stage. Scholars and development experts as- troversial, both within nations and between nations, signed mass communications a central role in the de- as long as mass media have existed, but never – nei- velopment process. ther before nor since – have information flows been In the Cold War era the newly independent debated with such passion as in the 1970s. The countries of the third world were of strategic im- United Nations, and UNESCO in particular, were the portance to both East and West. Development aid prime arenas where these issues were thrashed out. was an important factor for “winning the hearts and In the decades immediately following the second minds” of developing countries. New patron-client world war, the media debate was mainly a protracted relationships emerged; old, established ones evolv- trench battle in the Cold War, where the West rallied ed. The successes achieved by the oil-producing around the principle of “free flow of information” countries in OPEC in the 1970s strengthened the and the Eastern bloc iterated the need for state con- position of the third world as a bargaining partner trol. Although this East-West dispute was by no (albeit rising fuel prices had serious impacts on means resolved in the 1960s, the situation changed some developing countries).
    [Show full text]