The Interagency Weed Sentry Project PROJECT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Interagency Weed Sentry Project PROJECT The Interagency Weed Sentry Project PROJECT REPORT 2008-2009 for Clark County, Nevada and the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Agency/Organization: National Park Service-Lake Mead National Recreation Area Project Number: 2005-NPS-537-P Project Contact Name and Information: Alice Newton, Vegetation Mgt. Spec. Lake Mead National Recreation Area 601 Nevada Way Boulder City, NV 89005 Program Manager, Scott R. Abella Ph.D. Prepared by Jill E. Craig, Weed Sentry Coordinator Public Lands Institute University of Nevada Las Vegas 4505 South Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89154 - 2040 RAJ / 280 M/S 2040 Phone: 702-895-4678 Fax: 702-895-5166 http://publiclands.unlv.edu/ TABLE OF CONTENTS PG. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS AND MATERIALS 5 RESULTS AND EVIDENCE OF RESULTS 17 Trends of exotic species distributions 26 Special projects Assessing an exotic plant surveying program in the Mojave Desert, Clark County, 58 Nevada, USA NPS Lake Mead National Recreation Area: Rana onca (rare frog) habitat surveys 59 A condition assessment of spring and seep vegetation on the Desert National 61 Wildlife Refuge, southern Nevada Effects of water and disturbance on establishment of Brassica and native annuals 63 Brassica tournefortii competition with native annuals 64 Factors affecting exotic annual plant cover and richness along roadsides in the 66 eastern Mojave Desert, USA Vegetation of grassy remnants in the Las Vegas Valley, southern Nevada 68 CONCLUSION 70 RECOMMENDATIONS 72 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 73 LITERATURE CITED 74 FIGURES Figure 1. Steps for “checking out” data from the Weed Sentry database onto GPS 7 units to be taken into the field. Figure 2. Settings for the Symbol MC-7094. 8 Figure 3. How to download data from the GPS unit onto the computer after a survey 14 has been completed. Figure 4. How to add a place name to the Geodatabase when a new area has been 16 surveyed. Figure 5. Map of surveys conducted during FY2008 & FY2009 within each federal 19 land management agency. Figure 6. Map of surveys conducted during FY2008 & FY2009 within Clark County 23 management categories as determined by the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Figure 7. Map of surveys conducted during FY2008 & FY2009 within generalized 25 Clark County ecosystems as designated by the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Figure 8. Distribution of ecosystems within Clark County, Nevada, USA. 30 Figure 9. Distribution of four species of Bromus within the Poaceae Family; Bromus 31 diandrus, Bromus inermis, Bromus tectorum and Bromus trinii. Figure 10. Map of occurrence of top invaders of Family Brassicaceae; Brassica 32 tourneforii, Descurainia sophia, Malcolmia africana and Sisymbrium irio. Figure 11. Map of occurrences of less frequently recorded species within the 33 Brassicaceae family. Figure 12. Distribution of select Fabaceae families throughout Clark County. 34 Figure 13. Distribution of Phoenix dactylifera and Washingtonia filifera. 35 Figure 14. Locations of the fourteen species that were only recorded a single time. 36 Figure 15. Locations of the twelve species that were recorded 2, 3, or 4 times. 37 Figure 16. Map of survey lines (by fiscal year) indicating areas which were surveyed 38 on each management agency’s land. NPS 537 D-10 Final Project Report 01152010 II Figure 17. Distribution of infestation points on BLM lands in the northwestern survey 41 area. Figure 18. Distribution of infestation points on BLM lands in the northeastern survey 42 area. Figure 19. Distribution of infestation points on BLM lands in the southwestern survey 43 area. Figure 20. Distribution of infestation points on BLM lands in the southeastern survey 44 area. Figure 21. Distribution of infestation points on NPS lands in the northeastern survey 47 area. Figure 22. Distribution of infestation points on NPS lands in the western survey area. 48 Figure 23. Distribution of infestation points on NPS lands in the southern survey area. 49 Figure 24. Distribution of infestation points on USFS lands. 52 Figure 25. Distribution of infestation points at USFWS Desert National Wildlife Refuge. 55 Figure 26. Distribution of infestation points on USFWS land (Corn Creek Visitor 56 Center). Figure 27. Distribution of 42 recorded Malcolmia africana infestation points at Desert 57 National Wildlife Refuge. Figure 28. Diagram of changes in species richness at each spring over a gradient of 62 20 m. Figure 29. The relationship between the abundance of Brassica tournefortii and 65 Phacelia fremontii. Figure 30. The relationship between abundance of Brassica tournefortii and Encelia 65 farinosa. Figure 31. Plant species richness of exotic species and by growth form for native 69 species for four sites in the Las Vegas Valley, southern Nevada. NPS 537 D-10 Final Project Report 01152010 III TABLES Table 1. List of agency contacts. 6 Table 2. Form for recording weed occurrences manually when the mapping-quality 10 GPS unit malfunctions. Table 3. Form to record weed herbicide treatments manually. 11 Table 4. Checklist of equipment to be kept in vehicles. 12 Table 5. Miles and acres surveyed within each federal land management agency 18 during 2008 and 2009. Table 6. Number of individuals of each exotic species that were controlled on BLM 20 lands during 2008 and 2009. Table 7. Number of individuals of each exotic species that were controlled on Lake 20 Mead NRA lands during 2008 and 2009. Table 8. Number of individuals of each exotic species that were controlled on USFS 21 lands during 2008 and 2009. Table 9. Number of individuals of each species controlled within the USFWS 21 boundaries during 2008 and 2009. Table 10. Miles and acres surveyed within each MSHCP management category during 22 2008 and 2009. Table 11. Miles and acres surveyed by Weed Sentry within each Clark County 24 ecosystem during 2008 and 2009, along with the total acres each ecosystem occupies. Table 12. Number of infestation points recorded for each exotic species. 28 Table 13. Number of exotic species within each plant family. 29 Table 14. Species identity and number of infestation points recorded on BLM lands 40 from 2004-2009. Table 15. Species identity and number of infestation points recorded on NPS lands 46 from 2004-2009. Table 16. Species identity and number of recorded infestations on USFS lands from 51 2004-2009. NPS 537 D-10 Final Project Report 01152010 IV Table 17. Recorded infestations at Willow Beach Fish Hatchery. 53 Table 18. Infestations recorded at Moapa restoration area. 54 Table 19. The identity and number of infestations recorded at Desert National Wildlife 54 Refuge from 2004-2009. APPENDICES APPENDIX 1. Weed Sentry early warning documents APPENDIX 2: FY2008 – FY2009 raw data APPENDIX 3. Supporting personnel for Weed Sentry APPENDIX 4. Assessing an exotic plant surveying program in the Mojave Desert, Clark County, Nevada, USA (manuscript) APPENDIX 5. Special project: A detailed explanation of NPS Lake Mead National Recreation Area Rana onca (rare frog) habitat surveys APPENDIX 6. Special project: A presentation about vegetation manipulations promoting suitable Rana onca habitat (oral presentation) APPENDIX 7. Special project: A condition assessment of spring and seep vegetation on the Desert National Wildlife Refuge, southern Nevada APPENDIX 8. Response of Sahara mustard (Brassica tournefortii) to soil disturbance and water addition in the eastern Mojave Desert (poster presentation) APPENDIX 9. Factors affecting exotic annual plant cover and richness along roadsides in the eastern Mojave Desert, USA (manuscript) APPENDIX 10. Vegetation of grassy remnants in the Las Vegas Valley, southern Nevada (manuscript) NPS 537 D-10 Final Project Report 01152010 V NPS 537 D-10 Final Project Report 01152010 VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The goal of the Interagency Weed Sentry Project was to proactively detect incipient invasive plant populations so they could be controlled or eradicated before they negatively impacted ecosystems and species of concern. The major objectives of the Interagency Weed Sentry Project were to: (1) identify and document the presence of new exotic invasive plant species; (2) document targeted incipient populations of weeds in Clark County or vectors outside of Clark County and determine their distribution; and (3) control incipient weed populations when feasible and prioritize areas for more extensive control efforts. The measurable objectives of the Interagency Weed Sentry Project were to survey for and document the locations of invasive plant populations, treat incipient populations, and record negative weed data. Data supplied by the Interagency Weed Sentry Project could provide land managers with a valuable tool to guide their management decisions. Knowing where new infestations were, how extensive they were and receiving recommendations on how to treat them enabled land managers to make informed decisions and control invasive plants before they became major problems. During the biennium, members of the Public Lands Institute at the UNLV and NPS personnel have accomplished the following: . Surveyed BLM (357 miles/2,788 acres), NPS (290 miles/2,257 acres), USFS (37 miles/243 acres) and USFWS (123 miles/861 acres) lands for weed infestations. Recorded 3,559 weed infestation points (each point represents a weed population which can range in size from one individual to >100,000 individuals). Treated invasive plant species on BLM (5,095 individuals of 14 species), NPS (44,790 individuals of 14 species), USFS (14,272 individuals of 7 species) and USFWS (1225 individuals of 8 species) lands. Produced trip reports and offered recommendations for weed control to BLM, NPS, USFS and USFWS land managers. Conducted seven special research projects, which produced presentations and publications. NPS 537 D-10 Final Project Report 01152010 1 INTRODUCTION The Interagency Weed Sentry Project (henceforth Weed Sentry), was designed in 2003 to act as an early detection, rapid response program for invasive weeds on Clark County public land; specifically: National Park Service (NPS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands.
Recommended publications
  • Tectonic Influences on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Walker Lane: an Incipient Transform Fault Along the Evolving Pacific – North American Plate Boundary
    Arizona Geological Society Digest 22 2008 Tectonic influences on the spatial and temporal evolution of the Walker Lane: An incipient transform fault along the evolving Pacific – North American plate boundary James E. Faulds and Christopher D. Henry Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA ABSTRACT Since ~30 Ma, western North America has been evolving from an Andean type mar- gin to a dextral transform boundary. Transform growth has been marked by retreat of magmatic arcs, gravitational collapse of orogenic highlands, and periodic inland steps of the San Andreas fault system. In the western Great Basin, a system of dextral faults, known as the Walker Lane (WL) in the north and eastern California shear zone (ECSZ) in the south, currently accommodates ~20% of the Pacific – North America dextral motion. In contrast to the continuous 1100-km-long San Andreas system, discontinuous dextral faults with relatively short lengths (<10-250 km) characterize the WL-ECSZ. Cumulative dextral displacement across the WL-ECSZ generally decreases northward from ≥60 km in southern and east-central California, to ~25 km in northwest Nevada, to negligible in northeast California. GPS geodetic strain rates average ~10 mm/yr across the WL-ECSZ in the western Great Basin but are much less in the eastern WL near Las Vegas (<2 mm/ yr) and along the northwest terminus in northeast California (~2.5 mm/yr). The spatial and temporal evolution of the WL-ECSZ is closely linked to major plate boundary events along the San Andreas fault system. For example, the early Miocene elimination of microplates along the southern California coast, southward steps in the Rivera triple junction at 19-16 Ma and 13 Ma, and an increase in relative plate motions ~12 Ma collectively induced the first major episode of deformation in the WL-ECSZ, which began ~13 Ma along the N60°W-trending Las Vegas Valley shear zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead National Recreation Area Lake Meadsummer 2013 National Recreation Area
    National Park Service Park Newspaper U.S. Department of the Interior Lake Mead National Recreation Area Lake MeadSummer 2013 National Recreation Area Borrow a Lifejacket insure the proper size. The loaner lifejackets including education, warnings and citations. The point of the rule isn't to ticket boaters, but to Drowning is the number one cause of fatalities at must be returned before dusk to allow ensure that the most polluting engines are kept Lake Mead National Recreation Area. This loss rangers to inspect and properly store them. off the lake. As time passes, the number of non- of life can be prevented by wearing a lifejacket. Please remember to never leave children compliant PWCs will decline through attrition. unattended. Drowning is preventable if you put on a lifejacket. Wear One for Life! PWCs that meet the standards through the use of direct-injection two-stroke or New Personal Watercraft four-stroke engines are not subject to this prohibition and are still allowed on the lakes. Regulation in Effect Engines that meet the regulations should have an In an effort to safeguard the waters within Lake emission control information label that clearly Mead National Recreation Area, personal water- states that they conform to clean emissions stan- craft (PWC) must now meet 2006 Environmental dards. Boats are not impacted by this regulation. Protection Agency emission standards in order to operate within the park. This includes the waters of A list of frequently asked questions and PWC Lake Mead, Lake Mohave and the Colorado River. models that meet the emissions standards can be This year there are new Lifejacket Loaner found online at: Stations at Boulder Beach and Cottonwood “Lake Mead supplies drinking water for millions www.nps.gov/lake/parkmgmt/twostroke.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas Wash and Lake Mead
    Publications (WR) Water Resources 1996 Synthetic organic compounds: Las Vegas Wash and Lake Mead National Water Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA): Nevada Basin and Range Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/water_pubs Part of the Biogeochemistry Commons, Desert Ecology Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Repository Citation National Water Quality Assessment Program (NAWQA): Nevada Basin and Range (1996). Synthetic organic compounds: Las Vegas Wash and Lake Mead. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/water_pubs/79 This Technical Report is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Technical Report in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Technical Report has been accepted for inclusion in Publications (WR) by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION and industrial compounds), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's), phthalales, and phenols were detected at one or both The Nevada Basin and Range (NVBR) study unit of the of these sites. Many of these compounds are persistent in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead National Recreation Area Cycle 5 Report
    5RDG,QYHQWRU\DQG&RQGLWLRQ$VVHVVPHQW Lake Mead National Recreation Area LAKE Cycle 5 Report Prepared By: Federal Highway Administration Road Inventory Program (RIP) Data Collected: 05/2012 Report Date: 01/2013 Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada and Arizona ^_ ^_ Salt Lake City ^_ Carson City Cheyenne Denver^_ ! Colorado Springs Las Vegas ! !Long Beach ! ! Anaheim ! Lake MeadAlbuquerque^_ Santa Ana National Recreation! Area !San Diego Phoenix ^_! Mesa Tucson ! El Paso ! DCV = Data Collection Vehicle TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 1 2. PARK ROUTE INVENTORY 5RXWH,'V6XEFRPSRQHQWV &KDQJHV5HSRUW $V$SSOLFDEOH 2 – 1 3. PARK SUMMARY INFORMATION 3DYHG5RXWH0LOHVDQG3HUFHQWDJHVE\)XQFWLRQDO&ODVVDQG3&5 3 – 1 '&95RDG&RQGLWLRQ6XPPDU\ 3 – 3 4. PARK ROUTE LOCATION MAPS 5RXWH/RFDWLRQ.H\0DS 4 – 1 5RXWH/RFDWLRQ$UHD0DS 4 – 2 5RXWH&RQGLWLRQ.H\0DS±3&50LOHE\0LOH 4 – 12 5RXWH&RQGLWLRQ$UHD0DS±3&50LOHE\0LOH 4 – 13 5. PAVED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS &563DJHV 5 – 1 6. MANUALLY RATED PAVED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS 0553DJHV 6 – 1 7. PARKING AREA CONDITION RATING SHEETS 3DYHG3DUNLQJ$UHD3DJHV 7 – 1 8. ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES SUMMARIES '&95RXWH0DLQWHQDQFH)HDWXUHV6XPPDU\ 8 – 1 6WUXFWXUH/LVW 8 – 3 9. ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOGS 5RXWH0DLQWHQDQFH)HDWXUHV5RDG/RJV 9 – 1 10. APPENDIX ([SODQDWLRQRI&KDQJHVWRWKH5,3,QGH[(TXDWLRQVDQG'HWHUPLQDWLRQRI3&5 10 – 1 ([SODQDWLRQRIWKH([FHOOHQW*RRG)DLUDQG3RRU&RQGLWLRQ'HVFULSWLRQV 10 – 2 'HVFULSWLRQRI5DWLQJ6\VWHP 10 – 3 6XUIDFH'LVWUHVVHV 10 – 5 ,QGH[)RUPXODV 10 – 12 'DWD&ROOHFWLRQ9HKLFOH6XEV\VWHPV 10 – 16 *HRGDWDEDVH±%DFNJURXQGDQG0HWDGDWD 10 – 19 *ORVVDU\RI7HUPVDQG$EEUHYLDWLRQV 10 – 20 Section 1 Introduction Lake Mead National Recreation Area INTRODUCTION The Federal Highway Administration, (FHWA), in the mid 1970s, was charged with the task of identifying surface condition deficiencies and corrective priorities on National Park Service (NPS) roads and parkways.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub
    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead Detailed Information, Write to P.O
    Concession facilities. For Overton Beach Resort, Inc. Lake Mead detailed information, write to P.O. Box 714 or phone the following Overton, NV 89040 NATIONAL RECREATION AREA concessioners: (702) 397-2569 ARIZONA* NEVADA Callville Bay Marina Temple Bar Marina, Inc. 2103 Western Ave. Temple Bar, AZ 86443 Las Vegas, NV 89102 (602) 767-3400 (702) 565-8956 Willow Beach Resort, Inc. Cottonwood Cove P.O Box 187 Development Co. Boulder City, NV 89005 P.O. Box 11 54 (602)767-3311 Cottonwood Cove, NV 89046 Nearby services. Telephone (702) 297-1233 and telegraph services, Echo Bay Resort, Inc. churches, motels, cafes, P.O. Box 384 garages, service stations, Overton, NV 89040 photographic and curio shops, (702) 397-2661 and stores are in Boulder City Henderson, Las Vegas, North Lake Mead Ferry Service, Inc. Las Vegas, Searchlight, and 5030 Paradise Rd. Overton, Nev., and in Bullhead Las Vegas, NV89119 City and Kingman, Ariz. (702)736-6180 Transportation to the park. Las Vegas Boat Harbor Most visitors come here in P.O. Box 771 private vehicles. Others use Henderson, NV 8901 5 the nearest commercial airport (702) 565-9111 at Las Vegas. Airports for Lake Mead Lodge & Marina private planes are at Boulder (Boulder Beach) City and North Las Vegas. 2103 Western Ave. Additional landing strips are Las Vegas, NV 89102 at Overton and Echo Bay in (702) 293-3484, 293-2074 Nevada and at Temple Bar in Arizona. Mohave County Lake Mohave Resort, Inc. Airport in Bullhead City, (Katherine) Ariz., serves Katherine, and an Bullhead City, AZ 86430 unimproved airstrip is located (602) 754-3245 across Lake Mohave from Lakeshore Trailer Village Cottonwood Cove.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Mead National Recreation Area
    Lake Mead National Recreation Area William K. Dickinson, Superintendent April 2010 • First & largest national recreation area •5th most visited national park – visitation equal to Grand Canyon and Yosemite National Parks combined. Significance • 900 plant species • 500 animal species • Convergence of three of the four North American Deserts • 25 threatened or endangered species • Nine wilderness areas (185,000 acres) • 1.8 million years of geological occurrences • 10,000 years of human presence • Nevada’s first Traditional Cultural Property Supporting a wide variety of active recreation A half day’s drive for 25-30 million people Los Angeles 15 - 20 million population Phoenix (Metropolitan Area) 3 million population Salt Lake City 1 million population Las Vegas 4,000-6,000 new residents/month 2 million population 40 million annual visitors Annual visitation to Lake Mead NRA is 8 million 180,000-210,000 visitors over Memorial Day weekend - more than 40% of the NPS units visitation for an entire year Who depends on the Park? Economic Benefits • 9 major business contracts • $45 million gross annually • Fisheries - NDOW - $97 million • Lake Mead NRA contributes $500 million to $1 billion directly to the local and regional economy Lake Mead NRA • 8 water and wastewater systems • 340 buildings (seven fire stations) responsible for • 240 miles of paved roads 7 small cities • 850 miles of gravel and dirt roads • 7 campgrounds with 955 sites • 7 major marinas • $1 billion in infrastructure Lake Levels Overton Beach April 2000 Elev. 1208 ft Echo Bay Government CallvilleBay 5 miles Wash C S Pearce Las Vegas Bay Ferry South Cove BoulderHarbor Te m p l e B a r Hemenway Harbor Lake Levels Overton Beach April 2010 Echo Bay Elev.
    [Show full text]
  • Boathouse Cove Wilderness
    Boathouse Cove Road National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Jimbilnan & Pinto Valley Wilderness Lake Mead National Recreation Area Explore! Directions Boathouse Cove Road is a 9.1-mile backcountry Lake Mead National Recreation Area is located road that runs from Northshore Road south to east of Las Vegas, Nevada. At the Recreation the Virgin Basin of Lake Mead. The first couple Area drive north on Northshore Road towards of miles of the backcountry road is fairly flat Overton, Nevada. Turn right a few yards past then the road gets a little more difficult. A 4X4 mile marker 30 in between Callville Bay and is recommended. Echo Bay onto approved backcountry road 97. “A wilderness is hereby recognized as an The road winds it way through the Black area where the earth and its community of Mountains to Boathouse Cove at the mouth of life are untrammeled by man, where man the narrows in Virgin Basin. himself is a visitor who does not remain.” The backcountry road runs between the Jimbilnan Wilderness Area and the Pinto Valley Wilderness Area. The road itself is not designated as wilderness but all the surrounding land is wilderness. This area is very remote. Please be prepared before you decide to explore. Beautiful mountains and washes provide excellent scenery and pristine hiking. Watch for hawks and eagles.There are two primitive backcountry campgrounds; one with a spectacular view of the Overton Arm in the distance. Flora The two wilderness areas have a variety of Mojave Desert plants. One of the more common is the creosote.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Affected Environment
    Chapter Three Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 describes environmental resources (e.g., hydrologic, biologic, and socioeconomic) of the Colorado River Basin that could be affected by the proposed federal action and the range of alternatives for implementing the proposed federal action described in Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, respectively. The extent to which each specific resource may be impacted is discussed in Chapter 4. Section 3.2 presents a general discussion of the geographic scope within which potential effects of the alternatives are analyzed, and describes each of the potentially affected Colorado River reaches and water service areas. Subsequent sections in this chapter describe specific resources that may be potentially affected, such as water deliveries, recreation and biologic resources. Each resource section contains a discussion of one or more specific issues identified for consideration through scoping, public review and comment, and internal review (Chapter 1, Table 1.5-1). Final EIS – Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for 3-1 October 2007 Lake Powell and Lake Mead Affected Environment Chapter 3 This page intentionally left blank. Final EIS – Colorado River Interim Guidelines for October 2007 3-2 Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.2 Geographic Scope The proposed federal action considers modified operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead over a wide range of reservoir elevations as addressed by the four operational elements discussed in Section 1.2, i.e., shortage conditions, coordinated operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead, storage and delivery of Colorado River system and non-system water, and the modified ISG.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrologic Reconnaissance of Lake Mead National Recreation Area Las Vegas Wash to Virgin River, Nevada by R.L
    Geohydrologic Reconnaissance of Lake Mead National Recreation Area Las Vegas Wash to Virgin River, Nevada By R.L. LANEY and J.T. BALES U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96 4033 Prepared in cooperation with the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Tucson, Arizona 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 375 South Euclid Avenue Denver Federal Center Tucson, AZ 85719-6644 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................... Introduction................................................................................................................................................... l Acknowledgments....................................... .. ....................................................................................... 3 Rock units and their water-bearing characteristics .... .. .... ........ .... ........ .... .. .... .. .... .. .... .. ...... .... .. .... .. .. ... .. .... .. .. 3 Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, undifferentiated .. .. ...... .. .... .. .. .. .. ......... ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. 5 Horse Spring Formation......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biota of Lake Mead: Annotated Checklist and Bibliography
    Publications (WR) Water Resources 3-1977 Biota of Lake Mead: Annotated checklist and bibliography Wesley E. Niles University of Nevada, Las Vegas Charles L. Douglas University of Nevada, Las Vegas National Park Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/water_pubs Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Repository Citation Niles, W. E., Douglas, C. L., National Park Service (1977). Biota of Lake Mead: Annotated checklist and bibliography. Lake Mead Report Series, Project report NO.1 Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/water_pubs/7 This Technical Report is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Technical Report in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Technical Report has been accepted for inclusion in Publications (WR) by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Biota of Lake Mead National Recreation Area NEVADA - ARIZONA Lake Mead Report Series UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DELAMQSt COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA/LAS VEGAS Department of Biological Sciences Las Vegas, Nevada 89153 Charles L. Douglas, Unit Leader Senior Research Scientist National Park Service BIOTA OF LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA PROJECT REPORT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado River Miles Chart
    FOREWORD This river mile index for the Lower Colorado River lists river mileages that were determined from measurements made on Bureau of Reclamation aerial orthophotographs and U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangles. The Geological Survey and Bureau of Reclamation furnished information on stream gage locations, drainage areas and water surface elevation. River mile distances were measured upstream to the nearest tenth of a mile. The starting point for the Lower Colorado River mile index is at the southerly international boundary with Mexico. In cases where tributary washes did not have a well defined channel from the Colorado River to where they met the valley floor, the starting point was located at a latitude and longitude where the channel was well defined. Tributaries are shown as entering from the right or left from a position facing downstream. Elevation of water surface is shown at the average elevations in impoundments. The discharge pattern of the Colorado River between Davis Dam and Imperial Dam is influenced by daily power demands and seasonal irrigation and municipal and industrial requirements. The water surface elevations shown for this reach represent typical daily highs occurring during the summer period. This index was prepared by the Boulder Canyon Operations Office, Lower Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation. August 2001 RIVER MILE INDEX LOWER COLORADO RIVER River M ile Description Drainage Water Elev. Location Area Miles Sq. Miles Feet 0.0 Southerly International Boundary (L) 0.2 Stream gage, IBWC- 09522200, Colorado River at Southerly International Boundary near SAN LUIS, Arizona (R) 243,000 75.7 2.4 Outlet of Hunter=s Hole and Twenty-One Mile Mile Wasteway (L) 6.1 GADSDEN, Arizona (L) 18.8 Eleven Mile Wasteway (L) 21.6 Cooper Wasteway (old location) (L) 22.0 Main Outlet Drain-M.O.D.E.
    [Show full text]